Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 1: Complete Diversity Requirement)
📄 FREE CIVIL PROCEDURE OUTLINE
Download here: link coming soon.
📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
Community: studicata.com/groups/community
Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
📱 TECH
iOS app: studicata.com/ios
Android app: studicata.com/android
📣 ABOUT
Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
Email: info@studicata.com
Learn more: studicata.com
🎬 VIDEO INFO
Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 1: Complete Diversity Requirement)
00:00 Introduction
00:09 Requirements for a Court to Hear and Decide a Case
00:35 How a Federal Court Obtains Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
01:21 Diversity Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332
04:26 Practice Problem 1.0
10:47 Practice Problem 1.1
13:57 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)
15:55 Timing Issues in the Diversity Analysis
18:56 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1)
22:18 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2)
25:00 Practice Problem 2.0
27:23 Practice Problem 2.1
29:16 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(3)
30:20 Practice Problem 3.0
35:52 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(4)
36:59 Determining Citizenship of the Parties
38:20 Determining Citizenship: Individuals ("Natural Persons")
41:07 Determining Citizenship: Corporations
42:05 "Nerve Center" Test (Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010))
44:57 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 1)
47:56 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 2)
50:40 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 3)
53:01 Determining Citizenship: Unincorporated Associations
54:38 Determining Citizenship: Class Actions
55:47 Practice Problem 5.0
1:00:03 Conclusion
Primary sources of law for this video:
See U.S. Const. art. III, § 2; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1332, 1367.
See U.S. Const. amend. IV, § 1; International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945).
See 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
See Belleville Catering v. Champaign Market Place, 350 F.3d 691 (7th Cir. 2003); Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729 (7th Cir. 1998).
Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010).
Learn more: studicata.com
Пікірлер: 16
Thank you very much, you made this so easy for me.
It is broken down so well that I actually get it. Hopefully, it will click in order to write out essays.
Thank you for these!!!
Thank you so much!
Thank you❤
Thank you! Can you please add a Professional Responsibility course to Leap?
Suppose, P from NY for example, moved to a foreign state permanently, returns to visit family in NY and wishes to sue a NY resident, could diversity jurisdiction be applicable or would their most previous US domicile remain relevant as they are an American citizen? Does their foreign domicile mean they are treated as a foreign citizen for jurisdictional purposes? Would it be different if they still had a NY address or US bank account?
Who is the attorney in the video as I have a big judgement and I need to speak to him
Who is the attorney in the video
Y'all got that outline? Lol
At 22:02, this video conflicts with your video "How to Analyze Diversity Jurisdiction on a Civil Procedure Essay" at 8:30. Am I missing something?
@jeffh.2588
9 ай бұрын
22:02 also conflicts with 41:00 in the same video.
@alliescholten9238
7 ай бұрын
From everything I have learned and is outlined by Richard Freer there is no such thing as a dual citizen of states. You can only ever be domicile in one state at a time. Currently studying for my finals and I have looked in three different textbooks and the BARBRI resources to verify. I think there’s just an error in this video.
@studicata
7 ай бұрын
@@alliescholten9238 This is only true for individuals (i.e., an individual can only be a citizen of one state at a time for diversity purposes). However, a corporation holds dual citizenship for diversity purposes (its state of incorporation AND its principal place of business). See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). In the example at 22:02, it is explained that P3 is a corporation. Determining citizenship for diversity purposes is explained in comprehensive detail starting at 38:21 of this video. Thank you for bringing this up!
Who is the attorney in the video as I have a big judgement and I need to speak to him
Who is the attorney in the video as I have a big judgement and I need to speak to him