"How many mines does it take to make a minefield?" "None. Just put up a sign." I got a good laugh out of that. Never heard it before.

@SonsOfLorgar

6 ай бұрын

It's completely true though, because it has to be searched to call the bluff.

@infernosgaming8942

6 ай бұрын

@@SonsOfLorgaror better yet, bring forward mine clearing equipment, which can be targeted.

@tbeller80

6 ай бұрын

I think Guderian mentioned in his memoir that they realized they could split mines 50/50 with fakes because the effect on US mine clearing was the same.

@johnfisk811

6 ай бұрын

The hessian screen across the road also makes them halt and deploy. Like any obstacle even a false one benefits from being covered by fire. Even a little. If infantry is deployed to check then a single machine gun with occasional effective bursts will delay the infantry reporting. If some poor sod in a vehicle is volunteered to drive forwards a single hit on it will delay deployment further. The purpose is not to stop or draw down the advancing enemy but to delay them and briefly pin them in place for indirect attack or ambush.

@shaider1982

6 ай бұрын

From the old non-fiction book by Tom Clancy, the naval version would be a press-release.

Thank you for the shout out! The books are on the way :)

I would 100% be ok with sponsorships so long as they are time stamped in the video. It need not be said be careful with who you accept sponsorships from but otherwise take that bag you deserve it for the great content you put out.

@lostalone9320

6 ай бұрын

The Chieftain - Brought to you by the M256 120mm tank gun. If you can find a smoother bore main gun, you buy it.

@john_in_phoenix

5 ай бұрын

It would be ideal if he could get a beer sponsorship!

@ssgadamjunemann

2 ай бұрын

Just as long as not Bud Light

Regarding meetings - a Consultant (Surgeon) I used to work with used to say "Any meeting that takes more than 20 minutes isn't a meeting, it's a group therapy session. She had a good point! Her other method was to say on arrival "I have to be somewhere by X", and if things were dragging on, stand up at X and say "I have to go". After a few times, the message got across...

@alanwatts5445

6 ай бұрын

I had a commander who removed all the chairs from the conference room. Staff meetings started moving very fast after that.

@cmck472

6 ай бұрын

@@alanwatts5445 one ITU I knew of many years ago used to see how fast one could hand over a patient while giving all relevant information. The practice was discontinued after a chap sat down and gave a handover of “John Doe, 67, head injury, cream-crackered”, stood up and walked off. It was generally reckoned a two-word handover was unbeatable.

Strange tank battle: that time an American AA unit came accross Tigers being loaded onto flatcars (yes, it is _that_ engagement, mentioned in _that_ video). They started raking the Tigers with the 37mm and .50 guns, thus preventing the Tiger crews from entering and firing back. Ref: Steve Zaloga, "Pershing v. Tiger: Germany 1945" , chapter "Tigers in the west"

"...more interesting video editing...' No offense, sir, but I appreciate the simplicity and straightforwardness of your self-editing.

Strangest tank on tank encounter - surely the first one, as it had never happened before and no one knew just what to do based on experience.

@KartarNighthawk

6 ай бұрын

Villers-Bretonneuax was pretty epic

Timestamps: 0:00 Admin 3:23 Opinion on Boxer vs Stryker 7:12 Strangest/weirdest tank battle in history 7:37 Tank damage, repair or write-off 10:05 MBT classification 11:26 Which is more realistic, Girls und Panzer or World of Tanks? 11:45 Best and worst filming location for the Chieftain 12:31 M10 and the fate of the M1128 MGS 13:54 Tank and anti-tank deception 15:42 Brigades giving way to the division once again? 17:07 Favorite NA diesel locomotive 18:04 Why were tank destroyers used in urban combat? 19:24 Causes for Ukrainian losses to mines? 21:01 Lack of training for new equipment 22:55 The Schofield tank 25:00 Ideas from foreign militaries for the US to consider 26:43 Amphibious capabilities for a Bradley replacement? 29:39 Are 200 Zeroes A Lot? 29:59 Sherman Calliope 30:50 Solid side skirts 32:11 The tactical zig-zag 33:17 Tank turrets on US naval vessels 34:19 Commonalities in vehicle design 34:46 "Borrowing" vehicle designs 35:07 Autoloader out of ammo 35:22 Crewman height limit 36:00 Ajax vs Boxer 36:36 Good tank simulator games 37:31 Lack of dedicated tank engines 40:51 Soviet/Russian correlation of forces and means 41:22 Drone swarm defenses for a battalion 42:09 Why no ACAV for Europe? 42:40 Salvage or destroy an M1 43:16 Status of Stryker Dragoon 45:13 MPF and M1A3 conflicting niches? 46:48 Most overrated WW2 tank 47:03 Ukrainian airborne T-80 47:30 French vs Russian autoloader 47:40 Why only M48 in Vietnam? 48:02 Pros and cons of HESH 49:01 Soviet opinion of Valentine 49:53 Initial omission of muzzle brake on 76mm 52:03 ARSV program 56:29 Designing a future US recon vehicle 58:19 Aberdeen Soviet test reports 58:46 Rarity of infrared countermeasures 59:34 Belleville washer suspension 1:01:22 Soviet rear-facing MG 1:02:05 US Army equivalent to Constant Peg 1:03:13 Autoloader types and unmanned turrets

@G_Flash84625

6 ай бұрын

Thank you for doing god's work ^.^

@jackbiliny2435

6 ай бұрын

Thanks bro 🙂🙂

@Paciat

6 ай бұрын

Thank you Donald Duck.

@matthayward7889

6 ай бұрын

Doing gods work 👌

@cm275

6 ай бұрын

Good man right here.

It says something about TV documentaries that I've enjoyed just watching a man at a desk talk straight to camera for over an hour and enjoyed it more than most stuff on TV. Thank you Nick.

@washingtonradio

6 ай бұрын

I would add, a man at a desk who knows what he is talking about rather than some talking head who is only reading a script.

@cmck472

6 ай бұрын

Nick is an exceptional storyteller. If he had an extra few hours in his day, he should be narrating audiobooks - but I guess he has to sleep sometimes!

Scottish units in the desert war often used valentine as a battle taxi or external IFV.. as a full section could clamber onto it and be transported to the next debus point.. this proved a very satisfactory arrangement for both infantry and tankers

@lostalone9320

6 ай бұрын

Yes, I too prefer a combat role where I don't get shot at.

@thequeensowncameronhighlan7883

6 ай бұрын

Any references for that please ? Curiosity on my part.

@redstar96gr57

6 ай бұрын

@@thequeensowncameronhighlan7883 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Valentine_tank_Mk3_desert.jpg

@WanderlustZero

6 ай бұрын

@@thequeensowncameronhighlan7883 This photo would appear to corroborate that... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentine_tank#/media/File:Valentine_tank_Mk3_desert.jpg

@cmck472

6 ай бұрын

@@thequeensowncameronhighlan7883 George McDonald Frasier, Quartered Safe Out Here talks about being carried towards an action on a Sherman in Burma.

The Kelly's Heros Reference was Gold.

@tacomas9602

6 ай бұрын

Time stamp sir?

Well, the nice thing about being an Abrams tanker when it comes to flying, is that you already have plenty of turbine time. 🤣Unfortunately, the FAA won't let you log any of that. 😁 Getting my rotary license was a lot more fun than my fixed wing, but you do have to pay attention more depending on the environment. High tension power lines are not your friend, and neither are the towers they are suspended from. Settling with power, or vortex ring state is correctable - you have to get out of the rough patch of air you generated. Realizing you are in this condition is key. Reading about it in the NTSB report after the crash is too late. 😮🙃 Happy flying! ✈

The funniest tank engagement has got to be HMS Rodney vs a Tiger.

@seriousmaran9414

5 ай бұрын

There were several instances of tanks being taken out by a battleship

I'd recommend looking into sending Cobi an email, the polish company producing "quasi Lego" kits of basically every tank under the sun, many aircraft, ships, etc. They did sponsorships with Wargaming and with the Tank Museum, i'm sure they'd be all too happy to work with you, and the fans would be all too happy to have a 1/32 scale Chieftain lookalike as a minifigure :P

For one of the strangest tank engagements , the cleanup operation around the bosnian border on october 9th 1995. During one of these operations an american WW2 TD either an M18 or more likely an M36 in croatian service knocked out several mode "modern" serbian tanks T55, 60 series or 72 in rapid succession in basically extreme close range combat reminiscent of kelly's heroes... it then proceeded to nearly wipe out the command staff of its own guards brigade while shooting an friendly officer who tried to "requisition" an abandoned vehicle to serve as an ambulance. It did however kill the commanding officer of the brigade who was effectively in retirement but stayed in just to oversee the final cleanup the unit was to be involved in. There is bunch of extra stuff that followed but that would be too political so i will avoid that.

@commando4481

6 ай бұрын

where can i read more about this?

@wurzel9671

6 ай бұрын

​@@commando4481also intrigued

@jackdbur

5 ай бұрын

I'm guessing that there was Vodka involved?

We need to see an "Inside the Engines Cab" show now. Whats the steam locomotives version of Tensioning the Track? Oiling the running gear. "This 4-8-4 was build by Lima in 1942 for the XXX Railroad, she was in service for....."

@mbr5742

6 ай бұрын

Oh yes. Send the Chieftain to "Back to Yesterday 2024" in Beekbergen/Netherlands. Lots of 1930-50 steam engines in operation during the event.

@TheOdst219

6 ай бұрын

I think Hyce is a better option for that

@jimmydesouza4375

6 ай бұрын

There are some equivalents of that, the National Railway Museum in the UK does narrated video walkarounds of trains in their collection for instance. I beleive there's a channel called Hyce who is an employee at a US railway museum who does a similar thing.

@mbr5742

6 ай бұрын

@@jimmydesouza4375 Yes. But "my god, the boiler is not on fire" or "Can the Chieftain stoke a BR 52" would be nice...

The M4 Sherman had a stabilizer for the gun. My dad loved it. Many didn't understand how to use it

‘The Sheep is not a creature of the air’ refers to the limits of ovine aviation. I refer you to Monty Python Dear Chieftain.

@TheChieftainsHatch

6 ай бұрын

Yeah, my NorthWest Country Accent isn't all that great. I tried...

@CthulhuInc

6 ай бұрын

@@TheChieftainsHatch it wasn't a somerset accent? 😊

@johnfisk811

6 ай бұрын

Caprine mountain mobility is a weak substitute.

@driftertank

6 ай бұрын

"Bonsoir - ici nous avons les diagrammes modernes d'un mouton anglo-français."

@TheChieftainsHatch

6 ай бұрын

@@driftertank Et maintenant, une demonstratione fantastique....

Odd tank battle, Salerno, where the Royal Navy destroyer Nubian repulsed one German tank attack almost single-handedly.

@tarjei99

6 ай бұрын

Well, there were some US Navy light cruisers there. That was the second time the US Navy bailed the US Army out of serious trouble in Italy. I seem to remember that the British Army was better organized.

@lostalone9320

6 ай бұрын

Situations like that remind us all how big a difference there is between the weakest ships and the strongest land units. The "fearsome" 88mm anti tank gun fires 10kg shells. The "wimpy" 4.7" QF guns on a British Tribal class fire a 22kg shell, and fire them faster and further. Oh and the Destroyer has 8 of them.

@joebrennan2086

6 ай бұрын

I believe some German tanks once fought a Russian light cruiser in Southern Russia

@piritskenyer

6 ай бұрын

Boulogne-sur-mer, 1940, evacuation. A Pz IV of the 7th Panzer decided it would be a good idea to engage a RN destroyer evacuating troops from the pier. In fairness, they did set a fire on the stern, however destroyers seldom travel alone. And so it was that another RN destroyer started shooting at the tank using her 4.7" (120mm) naval guns. The tank was described as "cartwheeling" upon being direct impacted by a naval shell.

@adodgygeeza

6 ай бұрын

​@@lostalone9320 it's mostly a factor of range, a ship generally struggles to hit a point target like a tank and can't go hull down or similar. Whereas a tank if it finds a ship in range can target specific parts of the vessel. In the practice ships very rarely get into the range of direct fire weapons. In 1982, some RMs beat off a corvette with a Charles Gustaf.

For the question at 33:17, there was the experimental mounting of a modifed M551 Sheridan turret on the USS Flagstaff (PGH-1). There are photos on the Navsource website.

@ZaphodHarkonnen

6 ай бұрын

The Germans also prototyped a 155mm artillery piece on a naval vessel. One of the biggest problems is that army vehicles aren’t really designed to handle the oceanic environment. All that salt water is not good for steel. :P So they need to tweak things to minimise unprotected steel.

@AtomicBabel

6 ай бұрын

The 30mm turret from the USMC Advanced Amphibious Assault vehicle is currently also employed on San Antonio Class LPDs, LCS's and some Military Sea Lift Command Ships.

Bill Mauldin's Willie :" I'd ruther walk. A movin' foxhole attracks th' eye." Boxer: " Hold my pint, lad.."

Regarding 2:00, If youre looking for a nice casual DCS server, Tactical DCS is a great spot. The name is a bit misleading. Its pretty laid-back, with a focus on learning. There are a few courses run there every now and then too. Basic flight, basic rotary, specific airframe courses, etc. Bunch of casual events too. Links can be found online, but I can share one if needed. Its a great group, cant recommend it enough.

On the topic of kit not trained for and therefore not used, some Marine Corps units were issued AN/PEQ-2's in 2002 and carried them in their bags for months because they had no idea what they were or how to use them. In the anecdote I saw online, it wasn't until one sergeant returned to the unit from Ranger school who knew what they were and how they worked that they came out of their pouches. He showed them how to use them and they zeroed them shipboard on the way to Iraq with no other training or instruction.

@high633

6 ай бұрын

I was gonna mention the same story actually. Found it rather funny and slightly sad when i first heard it.

@just_one_opinion

14 күн бұрын

@@high633 why? usmc has been shit on since birth, being unwanted dept of navy. only thing we have are some bullshit stories of being best and toughest ra ra ra. I used the shit equipment in the 90s, we spend 8 hours erecting a lego bridge when army would run up a bridging tank and deploy same gap in 3 minutes. pathetic lack of equipment and ego bull stories make next generation so much more fodder.

Regarding the mounting tank turrets on ships, the german navy tested the feasibility of equiping frigates with the turret of the Panzerhaubitze 2000 in a study called MONARC. The mounting was capable of absorbing the recoil but it was deemed to costly to proof the turret against salt water.

@builder396

6 ай бұрын

Theyre late. Russians were putting T-34 turrets on all kinds of river craft back in WWII.

@jackdbur

5 ай бұрын

That was to give modern surface Combatant ships a gun which is useful for shore bombardment. The guns on modern ships other than the American 5" are not useful for shore bombardment. 😊

Reference use of Soviet/Warsaw Pact vehicles as OPFOR: I was an O/C at the Joint Readiness Training Center at Ft Chaffee/Little Rock AFB, AR from 90-93. Our OPFOR (at the time, 1-509 PIB, later 2d Cav Rgt when moved to Polk in 93) used VISMOD M551 Sheridans and other ground vehicles to replicate T72s and BRDMs, but the REAL thing was the use of an Mi8 Hip helicopter for OPFOR airmobile insertions. I vaguely recall that there was also an AN-something single- or twin-engine prop plane used, again by the OPFOR, for aerial resupply and POSSIBLY small scale airborne drops. Good Q&A today Chieftain! RLTW

@bharn253

20 күн бұрын

The airplane was a soviet cub. I served with the OPFOR at Ft Polk and Irwin. Fun Times and Good Training!

@bharn253

20 күн бұрын

They also had a Hind which was entertaining at observe also.

On the subject of tank(ish) turrets on ships, in the 1970s, Vickers designed a thing called the Autonomous Patrol Gun, which was essentially a Centurion tank turret, complete with it's 105mm L7 gun, fire-control system and three crew, adapted for use on naval vessels. The idea was to provide a self-contained, highly accurate gun that could be used for shore-bombardment or anti-ship work, that wouldn't demand much from the parent ship in terms of power, fire-control or other external support. I've never seen a picture of it or seen more than a paragraph of text about it (nobody bought it), so I don't know if it had the stabiliser upgraded (probably) or used the Centurion's actualy armoured turret shell (probably not). It may have been insired by earlier RN work from the 1950s on guns for Coastal Forces called CFS-1 and CFS-2, at least one of which used the 20 pounder gun originally developed for Centurion. I do know there was a study of available guns in the 1960s that showed the 105mm L7 was the best way to get a kill on a torpedo boat at 6000 yards. More recently, there was a study to use the PzH2000 turret as the basis of a 155mm naval gun, and there have also been projects to mount the Swedish AMOS twin 120mm mortar on smallish boats for inshore/riverine warfare. IIRC both of these got at least as far as hardware tests on ships, though how far that went I don't know.

Strangest/weirdest battle: it is a mechanized battle, not tank on tank. During the Great Emu War of 1932, the Australians were in wheeled vehicles and the commander stated if Australian armor could absorb as much munitions as emus, they'd be unstoppable. I suppose the emus were considered tracked since they leave tracks?

On "Decoys and Fakery"--My dad was US Army in late 70s. During desert warfare training, acting as OPFOR, they chained bus hulks from the target range sideways between 2 M113s to make a big dust cloud whilst the actual attack circled around and managed to enter the "good guys" rear unchallenged. The opening attack was grenade simulators into the command tent. The graders were merciless.

When I was in the British Army on 80s and early 90s withdrawal in contact was one of the favourite problems set for Lieutenant to Captains exam. The absolute favourite was reserve demolition for I believe both practical and historic reasons.

Equipment issued but not used because commanders weren't aware of it? The Canal Defense Light in WW2 is a good example. Two battalions were issued them and trained to use them, and then they turned in their CDL tanks for real tanks without using the CDL in mass.

I saw some pictures of russians taking a ww2 valentine of a bog/marsh couple of years ago, was totally surprised at the huge amount of ammo they took out of it, looks like it was almost fully loaded for combat.

Sadly budget cuts mean that each French division now has one guy who has to bake bread, sell garlic and perform mime all at the same time. The role of regimental Gauloises smoker is now only ceremonial, and is taken up by the senior NCO for parades and so on.

Always awesome when a new Chieftain video comes out!

I hear you about the extra cost-and greater expertise-of a professional camera man-and editor. It was also a bonus to see him trying out your ‘new worst drivers position’. I have become an S4 Patron. Keep up the good work. Cheers from NZ🇳🇿.

I was in 2nd Stryker Cavalry. I lived in one of those damned uncomfortable things for a year on the front lines of Afghanistan.

for the record, I totally support you taking on sponsorships. most youtube channels have sponsors and i see no reason why you shoudnt as well. channels like Drach and Forgotton Weapons do it fairly well in my opinion without impacting the content or sometimes even adding to it

What a tour deforce this time. Thank you for all the answers to questions I never knew I wanted answered.

Piggybacking off of your deception discussion around the 15:00 mark. In World of Tanks, one of the best strategies to utilize when you find yourself outnumbered without support is to find a defensible position or chokepoint and fight as though you have more tanks behind you, even though you actually do not. Fear of what is not known with certainty is a very powerful demotivator in combat, both in-game and in real life.

@jintsuubest9331

6 ай бұрын

Afawk, Fear of the unknown is the natural instincts of all life form with at least some intelligence.

I’m sure you’ve been contacted a million times since Ian launched it, but the Weapons & War app that he started would benefit massively from your content. I know of none of the behind the scene details, but selfishness demands I put it forward as I’ve been immensely enjoying the lack of YT ads.

@TheChieftainsHatch

6 ай бұрын

Honestly, I’m not familiar with it…

Thanks for your insights Chieftain.

Oh, and great to have you back!

Great Q&A Chieftain . Great way to spend a Saturday morning. Thank you!

@kiwiruna9077

6 ай бұрын

Or as in New Zealand Sunday morning

Strange tank ingagement, three Cromwells was able to leap a 20 ft (6.1 m) wide canal when surprised by enemy forces. WW2

Another great Q&A! And thank you for the quote! I'm sure you did Graham proud.

Thanks, Colonel. Agree or disagree your Q&A videos are always time well spent.

Haven’t figured out a thesis topic. That hits too close to home

I was a Stryker MEV (M1133) Commander in Iraq 06-08 (with 1-14 Cav, 3rd SBCT, 2nd ID) and I won't hear a word spoken against the platform. It's fast af, modular, roomy, and...most importantly...QUIET. We earned the moniker "Ghost Soldiers" for a reason.

Good video. Take care sir and to you and your family Merry Christmas. Be safe.

About Poles and their amphibious capabilities requirements, as far as I can tell, they stem from the fact, that the entire Poland-Krolewiec, and a big chunk of the polish-belarussian border runs alongside Masuria, which is effectively wetlands pockmarked by a huge amount of lakes. So the idea is to have vehicles there that wouldn't need to go around every puddle that proved too deep to wade through.

I always enjoy these, Keep them coming

Great Q and A. Few good historical facts i didn’t know. Workhorse!!!

glad to hear from you again

Re: Armour fighting vehicle turrets on ships. The 30mm turret from the USMC Advanced Amphibious Expeditionary fighting vehicle is currently employed on USN San Antonio Class LPDs, Littoral Combat Ships (Surface warfare mission package), and some Military Sea Lift ships.

We need to see more of your trains!

I would say that the most wierd engagement would be between a Dominican L/60L and a US Marine M50 Ontos during the Dominican Civil War. A M48 Patton also engaged a L/60L. But at least I figure that the L/60L's Madsen 20mm would be able to penetrate the Ontos 13mm amour. (the Ontos is just so wierd. Imagine the safty distance behind its 6 105mm recoilless rifles ?? I know that your main task as a 84mm Carl Gustav loader is to check behind to ensure that nobody get KFC'ed :) )

@TexasSpectre

6 ай бұрын

You'd think that, then you'd see the steep angles of the Ontos' armor. The upper front 13mm plate is sloped at 71 degrees back from vertical! Gives it an effective almost 40mm thickness from a dead on shot from the front. A modern M53 20mm API round fired from an M61 Vulcan can only penetrate 6.3mm of vertical armor. M56A3 HEI rounds can only blast through 12.5mm. Even allowing for the older cannon to have better performance for various reasons, it was going to struggle to get through that level of armor and it was likely to ricochet when hitting such an angled plate anyway. You're right, Ontos is a really weird and deceptive little beast with a monster alpha strike on tap.

@larsmathiesen8999

6 ай бұрын

​@@TexasSpectre You are probably right about this. And because the Ontos is a small sneaky TD the L/60L wound probaly not have seen the weird thing before the significant emotional event occurred ;)

@TexasSpectre

6 ай бұрын

@@larsmathiesen8999 To be fair to the L/60L crew, even if they'd seen it they likely had no clue what the heck that strange looking thing with the weird pipe racks on each side was.

I think the modular ability of boxer might come in handy as needs for militaries change. Look at how we're now sticking 30 mm turrets on the top of Stryker as an example. If that upgrade process is made simpler with their construction that might be handy.

About that Irish locomotive shipped from London Ontario to Ireland, I had just moved to London that year and was among the many spectators who gathered to watch the locomotive be transported to the airport. Cool memories.

Thank you for the Kelly's hero's reference. Brilliant!

Thanks Colonel, good one as always.

Boxer modularity: Maintenance is made much easier when you can separate components. As you said it's easier to keep desired modules online, but it also simplifies shipping damaged modules back to your logistics base or even the factory. With tight budgets armies don't like to buy stuff that's sitting around, but once you deploy a small portion of your fleet to some far away land they'll start saving on the logistics bill by only shipping what's necessary to keep the mission running. Loading only the chassis saves a lot on the cost of airlift, and for non time critical stuff you can send mission modules around the globe as (oversized) containers.

Now that was just a ton of information. I do feel smarter. Thanks Chief.

On a carousel cooking off, your auto turret would probably be fine, just no longer in the same postcode as the tank it came from…

@alexandermonro6768

6 ай бұрын

As has been clearly demonstrated by many such incidents with T72s in Ukraine.

@morat242

6 ай бұрын

The big downside with a bustle autoloader for a remote turret is size and weight. The TTB turret is tiny compared to the AbramsX, for example. And doesn't need armor to protect the ammo. If you use the weight saving to fit more side armor and a better APS, I suspect you're better off.

@fabiogalletti8616

6 ай бұрын

@@morat242 reasonable assumption. It's one of those dilemma of is worth having X at risks of Y? A small turret with a carousel in the hull may be a smaller target, thus less hits - but if it's hit, the tank is a write-off. A bigger bustle turret may be hit more but saving the hull? Where is the balance?

Really appreciate these videos thanks

I didn't know that the Q&A could be so interesting! I have a lot to catch up

Wait, the British figured out how to make briefings brief? Someone figure out how they've done this, we need this technology.

For weird tank battles...I came across a random reference to a purported encounter in which a US Marine LVT destroyed an IJN Ka-Mi during the fighting off Leyte. No idea if it's true or not, but if it is it would be the only known example of two amphibious tanks engaging one another at sea.

@just_one_opinion

14 күн бұрын

jap tank had more armor, but not much more.

With regards to tank turrets on US Navy vessels, a variation of the Navy's river monitors used in Vietnam had a 105mm howitzer in a T172 turret. This was the same turret used on the LVTH-6 tracked, armored landing vehicle. Not sure if that qualifies as a "tank" but it's close.

In regard to the modular capability of the Boxer, it was my understanding that the principal perceived operational benefit was the ability to transfer an urgently needed module from an unserviceable chassis to a serviceable chassis, as you mentioned with your ambulance example. Such a practice would also enable base and mobile workshops to more effectively utilise their personnel and equipment in real world conditions. There is nothing more annoying than having a specialised vehicle out of service, because: either it has been run into the ground OR more likely, reported vehicle faults have been ignored, due to the vehicle being parked out the back, straight after every exercise. You will know exactly what I am talking about😁. Cheers from NZ🇳🇿. The option to have spare modules seemed to be more of a sales manager’s wet dream than a realistic purchasing option. The marketing presentations that I watched, seemed to be focused on the ability to keep urgently needed modules in use.

Almost forgot that our host was a railfan as well! Now I need to ask, what are your favorite North American STEAM locomotives?

Great intro and video. Don't worry about the sponsor thing if it's needed.

there are some isses with the boxer, eg in terms of the modularity, they should have doubled the connection pins as they are at max capacity with the current weight limits of the pins meaning as we go on in time less moduals can actually be used without having to go back for further modification or downgrading some of the capability for being able to be used in the pins

I completely feel you on the DCS VRS issue ahaha. For a casual server experience that still has some solid action, I'd recommend trying out the Flashpoint Levant server. Its 80's themed PvE on the Syria Map, so air threats are ai MiG-21's, MiG-19's, MiG-23's, and MiG-29's (only when the campaign gets late-game). Its got quite a bit of Anti-Ship missions available for the Viggen, and Strike missions when anti-shipping runs out!

Thanks for the GHPC shoutout!

Grafenwoher had a bunch of Warsaw Pact equipment to check out. Remember climbing around a PT-76 and BRDM.

IIRC, Donn Stary’s Armored Combat in Vietnam claimed there was one M60 battalion deployed to Vietnam. He did not identify which unit it was and seemed to indicate it was in the Saigon area.

Just to add something about the boxer, the modularity part weight 2 to 2.5 tonnes of dead weight. Dead weight that did not exist in others 8x8s. I learned about it discussing with engineers during Eurosatory a few years back and it was a big critic of the concept. Also the armor was deemed to be poor (lot of weight being used for modularity instead of armor), they "plugged the holes" regarding armor by adding some, but this made the boxer the heaviest 8x8 and drastically decreased performances. But the modularity seem to be selling well with politicians, so i guess it has its use (even if they never buy complementary modules for it).

ef-em-er-al and yes :-) on visits - I've been to a lot in my time - and when I get to one where I'm even slightly well informed I find the staff fantastic and engaging - tank museums must absolutely love you (no sarcasm) showing up - you represent a "long lost friend met for the first time" and a stack of free publicity - the boss likely picks the biggest tank nerds to meet you and tells them to be nice - best day at work ever :-D

Yea! It's time for Land Drac and his Killer Boxes 📦! 😂 Seriously thou. I love this content and look forward to ever video

The main benefit of the modular bay is that it is easier to build custom variants that use the same engine/control/drive train and therefore share most spare parts. The germans used a similar approach in their cross country MAN trucks (that share a lot of parts between 5/7/10 to. Basically the military equivalent to a 20ft container

On dealing with drone swarms: I wouldn't be surprised if something along the lines of (miniaturized) Flak cannons were to make a comeback. Cant really fly a small drone through a cloud of metal fragment too easily.

I would also note that amphibious vehicles necessarily need a lot more maintenance support than regular ones. I will leave it to you to decide whether or not it is worse to have to rapidly exit the vehicle because it is on fire than to have to rapidly exit the vehicle because it is sinking due to various seals not having been properly serviced.

Regarding your train issue...I have no idea but... You could always vocalize the sounds until some other solution makes itself apparent. "WOO WOO! CHCHCHCHCH...PSSSHHHHHH...." Just make sure the wife isn't around, unless your trying to get some private time by slightly creeping her out. You do you, sir. Your numero uno dirty old Irishman fan here! Good to see you back!!! WOO WOO!!!! PS: I agree that the Panther was the 1st MBT.

I found it interesting and informative. I always do.

For your master’s thesis, would it be better to pick a topic you already know well, or choose a topic that would require you to do more background research? Potentially giving you a reason to study something you wouldn’t put much priority in?

@bobo-cc1xw

6 ай бұрын

Do you want the grade or to learn? Normally the grade will do you better long term

@TheChieftainsHatch

6 ай бұрын

I'm going for 'easiest'. It's as much a box to check on the way up. I've plenty of time to learn, but only so much time to do the thesis this year

like those videos, keep up a good work

EW against drone swarms may be quite effective against off the shelf drones and probably even the current generation stuff but we have the tech to install enough image rec etc in the drones to let them find a target even if they lose comms (not to mention that if you use directional antennas and control them from satellite it gets much harder to jam since you are further from satellite than drone on top of inherent adv of avoiding jamming...and you never fully block comms if properly designed just drop bit rate so u could still issue very short messages)

@jackdbur

5 ай бұрын

Hint Starlink is bringing out a smaller "personal" antenna! 😊

Love these vids 😊 thanks 😊

Because the Boxer modules are completely separated from the chassis/cab by bulkheads, you can kill the "vehicle" but the folks in the module are OK. And you could pull a damaged module off a chassis, pull an intact module of off a damaged chassis, and have one working unit while the damaged bits go back to the repair depot.

Love the Kelly’s Heroes call out.

Regarding Navel Vessels using tank turrets: (Sort Of). LVT-A1 used a Stuart turret with the 37mm for fire support, (Bunker Busting). When this proved inadequate, M8 turrets with the 75mm gun were used with varying results.

47:25 Hey! 2/11 is a fully airborne brigade! Granted 1/11 is a bunch of legs but they are getting around to becoming air assault one of these days. Also we have this fancy arctic tab which is genuinely the only organization in the active army explicitly trained and equipped for arctic operations.

@high633

6 ай бұрын

Glad I'm not the only who was indignant/incensed at that statement. Sincerely local populous to 2/11. Still wish they kept binky the bear as the mascot though.

1:02:05 -- I have also seen claims -- more with regard to Japanese tanks in WWII than to Soviet tanks -- that the purpose of the rear turret MG was so that the tank commander, when in a situation supporting infantry where the main gun would be overkill, could spin the turret around and use the rear MG on enemy troops, although given the ~19,000 awards of the Heer tank destruction badge, having German infantry engaging Soviet tanks in close combat would seem to be a more significant threat than the limited utility of a flexible MG mount in the turret.

Heyo, For the Boxer it can fit inside a C-130J-30 but you're absolutely at the upper limits and it would need to be in 2 pieces like the A-400. I don't believe we (Australia) ever actually did the testing for that during the LAND 400 Phase 2 Program when the Boxer was competing against the Patria 35. The air transportability trials we did were around Canberra using C-17s so far as I understand it. But the RAAF has just recently ordered enough C-130J-30s to double it's fleet, and we're pushing hard on Amphibious transport power as well. So it might be the case that the Boxer is theoretically transportable with a C-130, but not desirable. As such the ADF is making sure it has enough other Transport options, by freeing up C-17 and using amphibious transport where possible. You also mentioned Motorbikes being proposed for the Bradley. I've seen that the Australian Army was testing E-bikes alongside out new Boxers.

There was an incident in the Ardennes Offensive WWII when an M8 Greyhound engaged a Tiger I and won.

"36:36 Good tank simulator games", for whoever asked this, "Steel Fury Kharkov 1942" is also a great game. You might want to mod it, but the mods that are around (and surprisingly updated for such an old game) are pretty damn good.

Hoggit GAW is the classic laid back server PvE, relatively welcoming, not too larp'ie. Just load up and start running some low level pop up attacks on SAM installations

On tank autoloaders. Would it be possible to combine the two types of stowage, with the projectiles in a carousel and the propellant in the bustle with blowout panels?

@jintsuubest9331

6 ай бұрын

While yes, unless you are using 2 part liquid propellant, you achieved what? Also there are many ways to design hull stowage with blowout panel.

Fun fact: The Australian army said that they only changed the module s on the ASLAV a handful of times just to prove the concept. So while they think the module thing on the boxer as fun, they concede it’s unlikely to be used in practise.

Curious as to where I can read more about the British vehicle checkpoints seen in Northern Ireland, like how they were set up, and why they had advantages.

On the subject of recce vehicles, a 1984 Jane's that I have lists a number of CVR(T)-derived vehicle concepts submitted by Alvis to two American studies: Mobile Protected Weapon System (MPWS) and Mobile Protected Gun System (MPGS). Originally MPWS was USMC and MPGS was US Army, but the two services agreed to merge the two programmes. These are all based on the stretched CVR(T) chassis, which had six road wheels compared to five for the mainstreal CVR(T) series, and did go into limited production as the Stormer APC variant. The variant with a lower, Scorpion-style hull and a two-man turret was called "Sagitar": 1. Sagitar chassis with a Scorpion 90 turret, fitted with a Cockerill 90mm Mk.III gun. 2. Sagitar chassis fitted with a new turret similar to Scorpion but with a square planform and vertical sides. This was armed with the Scorpion's 76mm L23A1 gun, and an external twin TOW launcher on one side. My impression is that you could probably fit another one on the other side if you wanted to. 3. Sagitar chassis fitted with a different new turret armed with the ARES 75mm automatic gun. 4. Sagitar chassis fitted with a different new turret armed with a 105mm low pressure gun, either from Royal Ordnance or Rheinmetall.