Thank you! Hopefully viewers understand that these reviews are a challenge as the video revenue will not cover the costs of the item purchase. Great job!

@TechCornerTV

Ай бұрын

Hi, not even close, I bought the DSO2C10 for a review also, it took 2 years and something to be paid with the money of the views of that video review and it is one of my most seen videos. Is not for the money for sure, well at least with a channel of the size of mine. I'm glad the video was helpful. Thanks for watching and your encouraging comment! 💪

I'm glad that Owen/CDEK have decided to compete with the annoyingly popular Fnirsi 1014D, which has traditionally been overpriced for what it is. Fnirsi now makes many excellent products, but the 1014D is not one of them and they will hopefully upgrade or replace it soon with something that is a tool rather than a toy.

@TechCornerTV

Ай бұрын

Hi, I'm started to think that CDEK is just a brand of Liliput to send Owon devices to the market at a lower price. With this new updated hardware, this is really nice as oscilloscope, almost rigol level nice. Thanks for watching.

What is hilarious is that the stock photo on Ali shows an OWON logo top-left on the screen. That's as many words as needed to tie in the rebranding :)

@TechCornerTV

Ай бұрын

Hi, I bought this suspecting already that this will be a Owon product, to be honest, I think I kind of lost myself during the video establishing that trough comparations 😁 the bottom line is I really liked this for the price we can get it, if you analyze it, you can buy this complete and with quality oscilloscope almost for the price of portable one with 2 channels and 100Mhz. Thanks for watching!

The same product is also sold under the VEVOR brand

@InterestsAll

Ай бұрын

You are correct. I just bought the Vevor SDS1102 ...

@TechCornerTV

Ай бұрын

Hi, nice to know, thanks for watching and sharing the info!

Exact same software interface as the Hanmatek DOS1102, so assuming the same manufacturer. That split screen XY interface with no way to full-size the XY view is awful, and is the reason I sold it.

@TechCornerTV

Ай бұрын

Hi, considering the other entry level oscilloscopes available, 1104D, 2D10/15, etc, this has a better interface in my opinion, not including obviously Rigol, Siglent and so on, that have a much higher price and specs. Thanks for watching.

@anticapitalize

Ай бұрын

@@TechCornerTV It's not a bad scope, as long as you don't plan on using XY mode. I just can't understand why they didn't at least allow full-screen XY to be an option - it's such an easy and basic expected thing coming from any other scope. The best thing any of these low end scope companies could do is to just open source their firmware - the community would go absolutely wild.

Thanks for reviewing this instrument but since it has no existence on web then no need to advertise it and just refer to OEM version of OWON trustful brand name ....

@TechCornerTV

Ай бұрын

Hi, CDEK seems to have more products, so not sure if this a shadow brand of Owon of just a company rebranding products. Anyway, if Owon SDS1102 is like this, it's a very good oscilloscope. Thanks for watching.

@ahmedalshalchi

Ай бұрын

​@@TechCornerTV Ok , if you liked this product model then you can also do your OEM contracting with OWON to produce your own brand name with specific adjustments like CDEK did and sell to whole world and promote your own products , would you give a try ?!...

@yan7382

Ай бұрын

You have the aliexpress link in the description

Frankly, any digital oscilloscope that does not have intensity gradient is a toy and a waste of money. Yet they keep selling them. You really need intensity gradient to "see" complex waveforms. But if you just look at square waves and sine waves, like everyone uses to demo.... the cheapest turd can do that. If you ONLY work with digital logic, these scopes are fine. Just TRY to display something old, like an analog color pattern.... good luck!

@TechCornerTV

Ай бұрын

Hi, I understand what you say, but every case is a different case, not everyone repair old electronics, for me this should be more than enough, I have my channel for 3 years, give or take, and not once I needed that gradient on my projects. It's true, I'm a hobbyist, but hobbyist are a market also and don't need to spend more than 300€ on rigol or equivalent for something that they can have for half. I know that the quality is different, and so on, but all depends on your needs and more than that, your budget. I understand what you say, I reviewed a few oscilloscopes already, and while this is not the top of the chart, for 123€ beats everything I tested before, even the old Owon SDS1104 I have here. No need to say, that I'm referering to entry line oscilloscopes, not going to established brands, Keysight, Rigol, Siglent and so on. I appreciate your comment and I really do value the time you took to share, but I know from all the comments I see in here, that for example for countries like India, Pakistan and others that I see a lot of viewers here, for that price they will have a tool much better than the normal 100€ portable oscilloscope that they are *able to afford*. So again, in my point of view, I compare this device according the devices in it's price range. I will not even compare a Renault Clio with a Mercedes Benz SLK 500HP, I will compare a Clio with VW Polo, Peugeot 208, and so on. This is the position I take when reviewing an oscilloscope. What you're saying is that we should consider Dacia cars, one of the cheapest in europe, toy cars, they have the bare essential and when compared with VW they have a lot missing, but they're are enough for a lot of people, even for companies, and they're one of brands that grow and sold more cars in europe in the last years. Just an example, I hope that you get my point, I'm not saying that you're points aren't valid, they are, but there is always a lot of people that this will be enough. Thanks so much for watching and for sharing!

@Runco990

Ай бұрын

@@TechCornerTV Well, I use an HP 54624A. Can be had very cheap if you stay off eprey, and does all this beautifully. I get what you are saying and I DID mention that it's fine for people that only do basic and digital stuff. But a modern scope with intensity gradient can be had for just a little more from siglent or Rigol, so it's been my experience that buying TOO cheap will just force you to upgrade sooner or later, spending MORE money. I made this mistake myself and absolutely regretted it. Note, I started with TUBE scopes. Just my thoughts, as sometimes it IS better for a beginner to step up some on a scope, which is the most important tool on any bench. Better to grow into it than regret the purchase because it can't display certain things. I think my point is that the entry price point between a more capable scope and one that is not, is very minimal today.