Considering the amount of "research" O'Reilly does for his books, they should be called "Killing Trees".

I have to admit, George Will had big balls to take on Bill O'Reilly. He poked the papa bear and stood his ground.

@sandorebussolini

8 жыл бұрын

+philpot kentucky His thin lips got thinner, and he looked a bit bullied, but yeah, he's intellectually astute enough to not take a step backwards.

@jimmaculate5

8 жыл бұрын

+Sandore Bussolini He did speak up, even as Reilly talked/yelled over him, like the Bully he gets away with.

There's so much spin in that zone that it took off vertically and went on a 15 minute tour of New York City. No? Back to the drawing board.

@ptrinch

8 жыл бұрын

Yes.

@MRostendway

8 жыл бұрын

L

@jontobin5942

8 жыл бұрын

+stylz1 So much spin I'm surprised the camera crew at FOX doesn't have to deal with the Coriolis effect.

@theMosen

8 жыл бұрын

So much spin time got reversed and corrected like in Superman the movie.

@theMosen

8 жыл бұрын

Patrick Lilley Work on it a bit more.

Will should write a competing biography, and title it "Kissing Reagan."

O'Reilly: You used to call me on the cell phone...

"You didn't call me when you said you would!" sounds like a teenaged girl when she's pissed at her boyfriend XD

Fox on Fox crime is my favorite kind of crime.

A 15 minute long video uploaded 3 minutes ago already has dislikes... lol

@R0ckG1r7

8 жыл бұрын

Haw-Haw!

@ssj-rose4572

8 жыл бұрын

3 dislikes wow

@BrotherAlpha

8 жыл бұрын

+maxkeif4420 There are so many trolls that hate-watch TYT.

@SoulshineWavy

8 жыл бұрын

But the inclusion of Maher in the intro is pathetic and could potentially merit an early dislike.

@lizzybennet5726

8 жыл бұрын

+BrotherAlpha The trolls hate-masturbate to TYT. Then they bitch and whine about TYTs growing fanbase, ignorant to the fact that they contribute to it.

Bill call others hacks, he's despicable and shameless

"FOX on FOX crime" I'm dead !

GEEZ Bill O'Reilly sounds like a 17 year old girl "YOU DIDNT CALL ME" "I WAS TOLD YOU WOULD CALL ME" "YOU HAVE MY EXTENSION" "YOU SAID YOU WOULD CALL" GTFO this shit is pure comedy

Cenk, with all due respect.... You, of all people, have no standing to criticize anyone else's puns. No matter how bad they may be.

@themaypole

8 жыл бұрын

He kinda does cause he does his ironically, Bill thought his was funny and witty

Bill O'Reilly is such a baby.

"Bullet goes in, bullet goes out... You can't explain that." -- Bill O'Reilly

Two hacks fighting over who is more hacky.

Score 1 for George Will... seriously owned O'Reilly in that interview. And believe me, I'm not biased at all towards George Will.

WE don't talk to people when WE are writing OUR books, O'Reilly never wrote a book in his life.

So bill's 'killing' series has now moved on to people who weren't killed?

@themaypole

8 жыл бұрын

I hope his ghost writers write Killing Clinton next and the FBI investigate it thinking its a threat to the Pres

@deathislife1993

8 жыл бұрын

+Cornwall1888 Best comment I have ever read. Kudos.

@greenjelly01

8 жыл бұрын

+Cornwall1888 The reason for "Killing Reagan" is because Reagan is too liberal for today's conservatives. Cenk nailed it at 12:15

nothing is more entertaining than republicans going at each other- its win win situation for me lolololl

"You didn't call me when you said you would!" Bill O'Reilly sounds like he's been stood up at a second date...

I love how O'Reilly speaks of himself in the third-person.

Why is Bill Maher in that catfight intro with the other conservatives? Is TYT really that childish?! Making it look like he some how belongs to that crowd. Pathetic!

@MrPayloner

8 жыл бұрын

+Thytus Theyve had that cat fight intro for years because Bill Maher had been in some catfights before. Theyre not trying to make some subtle jab at Bill or anyone else on that intro.

@cp3shadow

8 жыл бұрын

+AntiThug PRO No you didn't....you just edited it.

@jonathanroberson122

8 жыл бұрын

Probably because they previously did a "cat fight" segment that had Bill Maher in it.

@6to1

8 жыл бұрын

+AntiThug PRO Remember "it's 'i' before 'e' except after 'c'!"... Except in neither... and weird...

@Flash9230

8 жыл бұрын

+AntiThug PRO Funny, considering Bill O'Reilly has said verbatim on his show that he identifies as a fiscal conservative.

At this point, I'm just waiting for "Killing O'Reilly" to come out.

@salaciousBastard

6 жыл бұрын

Holy $#!%! There's actually a book called "Killing O'Reilly"! I was just joking. lol.

Reilly's in way over his head per usual, the guy's a child with no love in his heart, ironically.

For the record, Bill O'Reilly never said in his book that the trauma that Ronald Reagan endured as a result of the assassination attempt caused an early onset of Alzheimer's for him while he was still in office. He did say that the president was often times distracted, and unable to follow conversations in meetings and fatigued. On his really bad days he would not even come down from the residence in the White House. The gun shoot wound that came within four inches from his hart did diminish him and it may have eventually contributed to his onset of Alzheimer's disease but that doesn't mean that he had it while he was in office. According to the book, some of the members of the White House staff and some members of Reagan's family tested him at one point to see if they felt he could still perform his duties. They concluded that he could.

anyone who takes a shot at papa bear like that has earned a beer in my book

This stuff needs to happen more often, I'd love to see Fox destroyed from within.

@sandorebussolini

8 жыл бұрын

+budred123 - Bernie Sanders FTW - There's a very close and symbiotic relationship between hate mongers and low IQs. You need to go back to your trailer and do some soul searching.

@xXbudred123Xx

8 жыл бұрын

Sandore Bussolini What are you on about? Who's hate mongering here? Fox News constantly lies to everyone who watches, I simply want them to either stop doing so or stop existing. Also, what trailer?

omg I get a strange pleasure watching old men fight like middle school girls.

I sat through all of this with an open mind until he started talking about all of the "liberal" things Reagan did. Yes, Reagan's name is invoked far too often by extremists on the right but he was also no liberal. I won't pick it apart piece by piece but will use Uygur's first claim, immigration amnesty, as an example. Reagan made a deal with the Democrats that controlled congress at the time that he would sign off on amnesty if border enforcement was stepped up and future illegals would be deported. Reagan kept up his end of the deal, the Dems did not. This, and many instances like this, are why the Democrats are no longer trusted and compromise deals are no longer made. Uygur is nothing but a leftist hack.

@josephsetorius3465

8 жыл бұрын

+Mark Bigelow I almost never respond on these pages, but I think...like the video... you initially hit the nail on the head. That he made sense until he started talking about the "liberal" things Reagan did. Not being a Democrat or Republican, and finding that my views do not easily fit comfortably into any current US political party-- including the Libertarian & Green parties, I find it easy to have an unbiased opinion in these kinds of debates. Where you start to lose me is when you talk about Reagan and his immigration policy, and the current environment of "no compromise". While I would not call any of the things Reagan did liberal, I am sure there are plenty of tea partiers, right wing Evangelicals, and ignorant people in the current GOP that would. Their religious or uneducated views...on just about anything...are rooted in emotion; not logic and reason. A Russell Train would not survive in today's GOP political climate...there would be no room for him. Republicans slowly began losing relevance the second they got in bed with the religious right, and those unwilling to compromise. Yet perhaps Barry Goldwater "deserves" the credit for this? It is like those idiotic bumper stickers I see that say "No compromise gun laws". Which is about the most un-American thing you can say...after all, without compromise, there would be no United States. Your argument about Democrats being no longer trusted, and hence the reason the Republicans have become the "do nothing" party, is juvenile and without solid basis; much like Bill O'Reilly's book. What we really have in this argument between Will & Bill, is the old rational conservative mature elements of the Republican party (Will), which are a necessary counterweight to the liberal Democrats; versus the whiney ignorant angry immature mob...feeding off its irrational emotion...(Bill). Which is obvious just watching the original clip. George is clearly more educated, articulate and knowledgeable; whereas Bill just looks like he is grasping at straws. Uygur may or may not be a leftist hack, but I would put him in the same camp...just on the left side of it...as O'Reilly. Whereas someone like Robert Reich would be more on par with George Will. I think, and hope, it is time for the Republicans to dump this weak tea overboard and into the harbor; much like the original patriots did on December 16, 1773. It is the only way the Republican Party will survive. I also hope, for your sake, you are on the side of reason, regardless of which side of the fence you feel more comfortable in.

who is bill O'Reilly to talk about slander or libel?

George Will, whatever else you want to say about him, is the last true conservative in the US system. This clip only proves what we've all known for some time.

One must at least respect the integrity of George Will, wrong though he is on many things including the history and accomplishments of Reagan, he at least is a reasonable person interested in rational argument who sticks to his guns.

@ChakkyCharizard

8 жыл бұрын

The commie has a point.

The irony here is that someone who doesn't even write his own books calls a Pulitzer Prize winner a hack!

@vcomp1960

8 жыл бұрын

+TraumaQueen65 You don't think O writes his own books. I suspected it. I would think guys like Hanity, Beck and those kinds of people don't even know how to write.

Evil vs Evil Always fun to watch.

George Will and his friends are trying to protect the last Republican anyone remotely liked.

This was the only time I actually cheered George Will on anything. Even when I was a conservative I didn't like him...BTW the main that changed me into a liberal thinker...turning 9 years old. Conservatives have the mentality I had when I was 8.

I like how George Will is totally stone-faced throughout the interview (and indeed, throughout life in general). A great contrast with the loud and ill-tempered Bill O'Reilly.

@jimmaculate5

8 жыл бұрын

+Kenneth Huang except for smiling and laffing.

@kjhuang

8 жыл бұрын

+JIm Buechler I don't think Will laughed once in the entire video. He might have smiled a little bit after O'Reilly called him a hack.

I lost all respect for you Bill O. George Will is alot SMARTER than you. You did say blacks who built the White House were well treated.

O'Reilly gets a taste of his own medicine. Love it.

I grew up in the 80's so I don't really remember Ronald Reagan's presidency, but from everything I hear about him, he would be a Democrat or Independent today. Dudes the most progressive Republican I've heard of in modern day.

OK, I was onboard until Cenk Uygur starts enumerating the reasons, make that alleged reasons, why O'Reilly wrote the book -- to explain all the un-conservative things Reagan did. The problem with this theory is that Uygur is presenting those actions in the contexts of today, not the existing contexts. Immigration was not only a far smaller problem then, Reagan's deal hinged on action by Democrats to close the border. That never happened because Reagan trusted politicians who are untrustworthy. Hence his subsequent use of the phrase 'trust but verify'. Dealing with 'terrorists' and Iran. Both of those were in the context of a greater goal, crushing the Soviets, and at a time when both Iran and terrorism were of minor importance to the Americans. When Reagan's actions were viewed in context, any reason for today's conservatives to distance themselves from them disappears, and so does Uygur's alleged reasons for O'Reilly writing what he did. This is no defence of O'Reilly or criticism of Will, nor an I taking sides in a dispute I don't know enough about, not having read Killing Reagan.

@typodhitzemann6851

8 жыл бұрын

+Brian Driscoll. It looks as though Reagan didn't 'verify'. When Obama deals with the same issues today(Thinking he has), then he catches all the fire in the world. As far as immigration being a smaller problem then - maybe wouldn't be as big of a problem now had it been dealt with properly then(?). We can easily say that today's immigration problems are small in 20 yrs time from now and excuse Obama/Bush and the rest whom throw it under the carpet. Dealing with terrorists is beyond the span of time. Terrorists were just as much a terrorist then, as they are now. Excuses for him dealing arms and deals w/ them are not excused. Then...or now. At root, you're correct in my opinion of your analysis. Yet cannot give Reps a pass for issues that are timeless. If this were the case, then we can excuse any or all of them in the future for what they do(or don't do) due to 'relevance' of the times. Some things can be that. But mostly, if any group is going to so harshly criticize and judge a sitting prez over such paramount issues....yet keep referring back to ppl like Reagan as the defining(and shining) example of how you do it right - Holds very little water. If he's not the right example, then don't mention him. They lose the argument overtime they invoke Reagan in these issues.

@briandriscoll1480

8 жыл бұрын

+TyPod Context counts. Pretending it doesn't and evaluating issues with no context leads nowhere. It doesn't do to simply say terrorists were just as much a terrorist then as they are now. Terrorism, not individual terrorists, is the issue, and it is a greater issue today than in the '80s.

@typodhitzemann6851

8 жыл бұрын

+Brian Driscoll Ok, context counts. But I believe if pundits are going to judge today's issues in regards to past presidents as fair game, then we can't always excuse they're actions(or lack thereof) because of its pertinence to 'the times'. Sometimes it is pertinent to the times, but there are far too many issues in relation to Reagan and the subsequent deference by conservatives to him - especially in how he dealt with those issues. Its then fair game. If they see fit to defer, then its fair game to compare. Also, its not necessarily about what era it was, or the level of the problem. Its how they dealt with it. Certain problems are dealt with in a certain manner that transcends time. Other Presidents are analyzed and judged for their actions(or lack of). So is Reagan. It wasn't that long ago. Every President is still deferred and criticized for yesterday by todays standards on both sides of the isle, so its important that it all stop, or Reagan et al are fair game. In 30 yrs, they'll be doing the same thing with Obama.

8:57 George Will silently works the audience while O'Reilly disintegrates

Well, tide goes in, tide goes out, you can't explain that!

O'Reilly is not an expert on anything let alone history

@rsmaczny9694

8 жыл бұрын

+Zeno Zarlengo O'Reilly is a sack of shit

@zuriepope2532

8 жыл бұрын

+Zeno Zarlengo Well he is an expert at manipulating people into blindly agreeing with him.

Ronald Reagan was by far one of the only Presidents in the 80's.

@elijahpickens

8 жыл бұрын

+Brandon DeFalco HAHAHAHA

I disagree with Will on various things but he's clearly very intelligent and learned. O'Reilly had never heard of John Maynard Keynes. He referred to him as John Maynard and thought he had lived in the 18th century (he lived in the 20th). George Will could probably name the twenty greatest economists from Adam Smith forward. "We do our own investigation which doesn't involve talking to the people actually involved in the event."

Will gave Reagan a Halo and O'Reilly gave Reagan PTSD, lol

Boy, those two sure like to puntificate.

FOX on FOX CRIME! I totally love it!! It's about damn time!

religious disputes are always comical

Implosion .... knew it would happen someday ... why does a journalist have to call anyone let alone O'Reilly before submitting a column? ... reminded me of a couple of 10 yr olds ... nice to see some truth come out. Peace to all ....

O'Reilly is trying to counteract the deification of Ronald Reagan by inventing Ronald Reagan apologetics? That is both ironic and adorable.

TYT, guys, its time to take Bill Maher off of that graphic. He is nothing like those other people on there. He is right most of the time.

@MRostendway

8 жыл бұрын

Cenk hates Maher

@GoldenPhil

8 жыл бұрын

+MRostendway Yes I heard that. I wonder why Cenk hates Maher

@MRostendway

8 жыл бұрын

Phil G I heard there is a long history of jealousy and butthurt.. not exaclty sure though.

@LadyJay114

8 жыл бұрын

I don't know why Cenk doesn't like Maher, but I've personally find myself taking whatever Maher says with a bit of skepticism because I find that Maher overgeneralizes a lot lately.

@richardtaylor3331

8 жыл бұрын

Brooklyn Babe Yep, me too. I probably disagree with about 10% of what he says. I still find him very funny though. My point is that the other people on that graphic are completely nuts and I almost never agree with them because their world view is so batshit crazy.

this and the break down of ben carson were incredibly entertaining, educational, hilarious, and made my day. thanks cenk.

Yay!! Haven't seen the catfight logo in quite a while!

4:10 Most awkward attempt at a date invitation ever

Let us remember one very pertinent fact regarding the belief systems and ideals of the political parties. They are fluid and have changed dramatically from Reagan's era till now, just as from Kennedy's era to Reagan's. Listen to any of Kennedy's speeches and then compare with popular Democratic ideology and practice of the 80's. Are they similar? Kennedy, I believe, would not associate himself with the Democratic party of today. Similarly, an examination of Reagan's speeches compared to current popular Republican ideology and practice are equally dissimilar. Both men rattled the respective party cages early in their administrations. So in the closing segment of an otherwise well presented unbiased summary, some bias enters negatively that would otherwise been neutral. That's just the way it was. However, Thanks for the insight to the cat fight, and keen analysis to the behind the words aspects and meaning. George Will has long been one of my favorite political writers/commentators since the late 70's. Partly due to his historical views and political stance (which also has changed over the years) but in great part for his eloquent command of language and nuance. Something Bill O'Reilly doesn't posses or perhaps even comprehend. To hear him call George Will a hack was akin to what Alice must've felt stepping through the looking glass...

George Will is equally crude and disrespectful. On several instances, he berates people in T.V. shows when they have no way of defending themselves: 1. In 2005 immediately after interviewing Luis Farahkan on ABC's "This Week", and immediately after Farakhan left the show, in the very next segment George Will declares that Farakhan is a "Mad man" and should not be taken seriously. 2. He constantly makes snide comments about Hiliary Clinton on Fox and ABC news. In the 2000 Senate campaign for New York, he said that Mrs. Clinton lacks credibility and intellectual heft to walk in the footsteps of retiring Daniel P. Monnihan (I paraphrase). The tone and emphasis he uses is quite similar to what you see in O'Reilly. What goes around comes around - George Will got what he deserved.

DAMN! That was fun!

Never ever side with O'Reilly.

I don't even like Bill 0'Reilly but you, the Turks, make him look like a honest and mature newsman.

George Will was not "massively wrong". He never said in that quarrel he had with Bill O'Reilly that Reagan never changed his positions. President Reagan did what he thought best under the circumstances. In Lebanon his decision to cut his losses and leave was the sensible one. Same with his decision to increase taxes when he needed to. Reagan remained popular even when he did what was unpopular. People trusted him.

@natch27

7 жыл бұрын

Starbuck2015 - Reagan's approval rating was 52.8% when he left office in January 1989. The Iran-Contra affair changed many people's view on how much he had left in the tank. Reagan's popularity has grown significantly with Republicans since he left office, especially when compared to Bush 41 and 43. Btw, Bush 41's approval rating was 61% when he left office, for what it's worth.

@1969JohnnyM

7 жыл бұрын

The whole world was in recession in the 1970's whilst Reagan was lucky to get elected as it ended yet despite that although he cut taxes aka trickle down economics the government was soon left with a massive debt to pay for everything Reagan was doing such as the military budget raising to 6% of GDP a rate usually only seen at a time of major war which is why although he dropped taxes mostly for the rich he also ended up raising taxes as well, 11 times in fact yo try and balance the books yet despite this shockingly Reagan took the US from being the world's largest creditor nation to being the word's largest debtor nation and he added more debt in his presidency than all 39 Presidents before him combined but you wont learn that from the romanticised history that has been created around Reagan. Prior to Reagan the US did great and even thru world recessions its economy still grew by at least 1% whilst the last time the USA economy went up the shitter was when Presidents Harding, Coolidge and Hoover did an earlier version of massive tax cuts which led to the Great Depression, the poverty rate increasing massively, social mobility levels getting worse. Just as Reagan like policies led to the Great Depression, George W Bush copied St Reagan and we got the 2007-08 Great Recession and now Trump plans the same and we can already see the Wall Street balloon being blown up again with the clock ticking until it to explodes in the near future for tax payers to bail out Trump's elitist friends again.

@parmarec2

7 жыл бұрын

This evil man brought ton's of dope to people of color fact or fiction double R is paying for his sin's

when o'rilley went why didn't you call me sounded like a crazy ex.

5:07 whaaaaat! where does it say that every time a "journalist" talks about another "journalist" they have to contact them?

@walterlevesque4879

7 жыл бұрын

quotes

I LOVE verbal cat fights. All the drama and no one gets physically hurt ;-D Keep um coming!

Hahah I loved the elbow on the desk and finger on the side of his face when O'Reilly started spewing insults at him. He's thinking "where does this guy get such a pickled watermelon for a brain?!"

This fight between those two was hilarious!!! X-D

Cenk looks happier than my cousin on Christmas day when he was 10, and his parents bought him a Sega Genesis.

@bobloblaw2568

8 жыл бұрын

Try hard much?

Bill O'Reilly is that kind of a guy who you wanna punch right in the face the moment you see him!

Heck, after listening to Cenk's analysis, I'm convinced that President Reagan was a liberal!

@00ghostcobra

8 жыл бұрын

+JeffGR4 That what I was thinking... Now I am trying to understand why conservatives worship Reagan so much?

George is right, of course!

the power move failed badly!! wish more hosts on tv attacked each other like this bring back hannity & colmes

To call each other a liberal or leftist is still a big insult in conservative circles.

If "butthurt" was listed in the dictionary, the definition would be a picture of Bill O'Reilly

Also, Reagan was the president who began the trend of shoving catastropic debt onto future generations -- running up our national debt hugely during his 8 yrs. But Will and O'Reilly won't mention this.

O'Reilly talking about journalistic obligations. Brilliant.

lmoa, "fox on fox crime".

is this what news is like in the states?

@franksvatek1873

6 жыл бұрын

dadada486, Yup; sure is . . .

@pawelkuczera

3 жыл бұрын

That, plus local weather and fires or flood report.

"Was that a pun within a pun?" WE NEED TO GO DEEPER!

5:19 "How hard is he?" Considering this is FoxNews, home of the serial harasser, he's probably hard as hell *right now.*

When choosing between the lesser of evils never forget that the lesser is still an evil.

Out of conservatives I find George Will a honest person. I have watched George Will and read his articles for years. He is a honest actor.

"It is a laudatory book or you can't read!" I can't

Even if George Will is wrong; the fact that he took down Bill O'Reilly makes me happy, lol.

When Cenk winces at your puns you need to go and have a word with yourself.

Oh, and personally, I can't stand either one of these overgrown preschoolers.

Damn!! they should have these fox on fox fights more often.

reagan was a nut in 1947

We were so close to getting a full "you used to call me on my cell phone..."

Oh, the irony of O'Reilly calling anyone a hack. He doesn't even write his books himself; all his tripe fests are ghostwritten by Martin Dugard. These books are filled with conspiracy theory, unsubstantiated claims, and historical inaccuracies. People may not agree with George Will politically, but he's an accomplished Pulitzer-winning writer with an impressive professional and academic resume (his articles on baseball are well written). He may be wrong on some subjects in my view, but at least he brings some intellectual rigor to his comments and writing.

Fox News is the reason political satire is so hard to do these days, they've really perfected the art of making politics comedic.

Do people really think O'Reilly writes anything much less 5 books or so? Of course not he had a ton of ghost writers doing the hard work and he just comes along after and puts his name on it.

Knowing my interest in history, a relative gave me a copy of O'Reilly's Killing Lincoln. It's not that I couldn't finish it; I couldn't even begin it. I opened it long enough to realize that for some reason O'Reilly wrote it (a history book) in the present tense and that he had nothing cited. It doesn't even pretend to be a serious work of history. Nope.

5:03 you can tell O'Reilly is scarred. He slightly stutters and he's shaking slightly.

Reagan's senility was probably due to the daily alcohol consumption, he and Nancy loved their evening cocktails. Turned out Nancy could handle her liquor better.

Reagan was a big government, liberal. He makes Obama look conservative!

@Deke1

8 жыл бұрын

+Rick DiGregorio you sir are a GRUBER!

@___-_____-

8 жыл бұрын

+Deke1 Gruber?

Oreilly is the most unprofessional person on the tube.

Reagan was a conservative in the time he was president. The fact that the current parties lean to such extremes does not have any impact on Reagan or any past president's record.

His title was Fox News Contributor at start of interview and Syndicated Columnist by the end.

he says he has no ill-will but he insults him at the beginning of his broadcast Bill O'Reilly so for crap