Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 vs EF 16-35mm f/4 vs RF 16mm f/2.8 | Video Test Comparison
Ғылым және технология
Canon R5: amzn.to/34Ni2xT
Canon R7: amzn.to/3WPmsx4
Canon RF14-35mm F4: amzn.to/3VOsexy
Canon RF16mm F2.8 STM: amzn.to/3PoPZt8
Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS Lens: amzn.to/38itm7b
Canon EF-EOS R Adapter: amzn.to/3aLZrWD
Sigma 18-35mm: amzn.to/3OChD72
Freewell (Mist Edition) 82mm Threaded Variable ND Filter Standard Day 2 to 5 Stop: amzn.to/3vt4eU2
Canon R7 with EF to RF Drop-in VariND and Sigma 18-35mm | Video Test: • Canon R7 with EF to RF...
Canon R7 IBIS Test with Sigma 18-35mm | Not Great, Use a lens with IS: • Canon R7 IBIS Test wit...
___________________________________________________
SUBSCRIBE: / @videogizmology
FOLLOW
Twitter: / videogizmology
Instagram: / video_gizmology
Blog: videogizmology.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMERS: Some of my links have an affiliate code, allowing me to make a small commission at no additional cost to you. It helps my channel if you buy from those links.
The opinions expressed in this video were not influenced by or paid for by any outside individual or company. I only use and test products I buy myself with my own money unless otherwise noted.
Пікірлер: 6
I hate how wide Rf lenses are. Sony lenses look so much better
I wouldn't use EF lenses on R bodies - EF lenses on R bodies producing soft images compare to native RF lenses.
@jcloiseau
Жыл бұрын
this is non sense
@serglesnikov
Жыл бұрын
Where did u get that bullshit? Tons of comparisons and no one submit this issue))
@fernandojimenez503
Жыл бұрын
totally incorrect, EF lenses are plenty sharp on mirror less RF bodies.
@bodinian
6 ай бұрын
@@jcloiseau yeah, the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 version 3 worked great on my R6. I only sold it to get the RF version so it would fit in my camera bag better.