That red flare on bright stars you get badly with the Moon with modded cams too. Also can't believe they still haven't added an intervalometer with a firmware upgrade though! Nice review dude

@AlynWallace

3 жыл бұрын

Also the better input referred read noise results is based on the fact that you capture about a 1/3 stop more light with modded cams once the IR-cut filter is removed/replaced. Input referred read noise is based on the amount of signal you capture, so as you're capturing more signal, the input referred read noise is less.

@kamaromike

3 жыл бұрын

If you don't mind going third-party firmware I believe MagicLantern is working on something for the new Canon cameras that will add tons of functionality and control. I can't say if an intervalometer will be there... BUT you can always check them out and make requests. I'm sure they are currently looking for people to code and/or test their stuff.

@UNSCPILOT

2 жыл бұрын

Do those "red halos" mostly appear on wide angle lenses or do they show up higher focal lengths too?

Great review! I just got the Ra and didn’t know there were so many great filter options, thank you for letting us know!

You are amazing!!! Finally a perfect review for my camera!!! Many many questions answered!!!

Awesome production!! The opening moments are nerve tingling! Keep up your fantastic production standards.

Nice review, some cracking photos there. My son bought himself the R last year, I have only just managed to borrow it for some astro, very impressed, looks like the RA is going to have to be added to my list.

Amazing review Nico!

Super in depth review Nico! That cinematorgraphy of the camera is excellent :D

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Helena! It was fun to shoot. I had the music playing while I filmed

Most awaited review !!!

Excellent in-depth review, Nico. I love my RA camera especially having less noise at high iso compared to the R, but I do have one niggle and that's the focusing zoom of 5x-30x. I detest the 30x! (lol). I sure wish Canon would do a firmware update to include a 10x or 15x in there. Anyway, once again, great review. :)

Another great Video Nico!!!! Very useful feedback for beginner people like me! It helps to better understand what equipment we should be investing by knowing strengths and weaknesses of it. I like what you always say that the choice of which equipment depends on what type of photos and our personal taste. I am very interested in the concept of shooting with a dedicated astro camera, however, I am terrified with the Idea of having to carry a laptop and other 1000 cables when doing astrophotos. Reason why I am flirting with the idea of buying a better DSLR to replace my old Canon 1100D. Thanks A lot for this and all the other videos!

Excellent review!

Great video as always. I'm convinced.

Excellent video, TY for giving the Workaround for the red flare (I was having this issue with my Ra with my VMC 260 ). Have a nice day :)

Dope Video! Amazing cinematic shots taken from camera for camera so that we can watch if with our camera (eyes). Good Luck for next upcoming videos. :)

Absolutely brilliant analysis. Thanks

Great Nico ..my favorite astroman is on my screen love it !

This intro !! Canon hire this dude right now !! It’s an order !

Great review, thanks for sharing. In regard to RF lenses, I'm using an EOS R (stock) and I noticed that the RF 24-105mm f/4L is very nice for astrophotography in terms of image quality, absence of aberrations etc. It's not the fastest lens and not a prime, but maybe you'd wish to rent one and give it a try. Cheers!

Great video and review! I bought mine on Trevor J's review, (also, clearly, just for the box it came in) I thought it would be a once in lifetime buy but in Raw it is so good all round I've been round the clock a few times already. It certainly is a wallet melting price but I wouldn't be without it. Never mind the colour cards, try a picture of a rainbow. The 30x function is truly brilliant for focus with a mask and wide angle lenses. Sadly I didn't buy the filter drawer adaptor as it was another £500. Thanks for doing this Ra update review and pleased you've a positive end result.

I have the QHY268C, it's an awesome camera. They now offer the Mono version so if you want to go Mono with colour filter wheel then that's now an option, although given the choice and how good the colour version is, for my usage I'd still go with the colour version and have way less to set up and process. Swings and roundabouts! This goes on my 9.25" SCT, and I have a t6i on a separate tracker for wider angle work, so I am looking at the Ra as an upgrade for that.

Stunning intro, and helpful video too👍❤️

Awesome work - a great summary there. I'm using a stock R and found it such a great upgrade from a 60D (obviously!). Two things from the video - your focus issues with the clip filter and Sigma - possibly caused by the low f-stop not playing ball with the filter and also the filter itself. Appreciate it's not Astronomik but Hutech advise for their clip in filters that the sensor needs to be shifted back to account for the extra glass / achieve correct back focus. Might be the issue? Second - I'd seen that 3d printed drop in you showes but there weren't any instructions - how does it work? It looks like you take out a 49mm filter from a screw thread and then drop it in the 3d printed one? Keep up the good work!

I watched it tonight. Lot of information in a hurry very good explanation of that camera I say the pros out weight the cons , Im Not nearly ready to bump up to filters. I also watched the video on plate solving and finding your target at this stage it seems overwhelming. But I will be ready pretty soon.

Great depth Review of The Camera!! Very Honest Review I Can Say!!👍📷

Great review Nico the Ra is my first full frame camera since 35mm film days , also have a 60Da (my first DSLR) , must check out that 2" filter drawer you mentioned wonder if he posts to Australia? I too miss a built in intervalometer maybe the Magic Lantern firmware will add that at some point ? Works on the 60Da.

Great stuff. I really appreciate the level of detail you bring to your videos. I'd be interested to know what you make of the Samyang RF 85mm f1.4 as a budget alternative to the Canon RF 85mm f1.2 lens.

Nico, it's always a pleasure watching you work. Hopefully, the following NEAF event will be in person without this c19 bs & I'll get to meet you in person. If the planets aligned right, Trevor, the holy biscuit himself Rory & you under one roof would be flippin epic!

My kit used to include a T2i for my normal photography and a modified/cooled T3i for my astrophotography. I had them so long I forgot about getting anything better and when I finally did I decided to go pretty big. Instead of the EOS Ra I ended up getting an ASI 294MC Pro to use with my ES 102ED and a regular EOS R off the used market for my regular stuff. I'm super happy with both. The dedicated astro cameras have a bit more of a learning curve compared to a standard DSLR or Mirrorless but even the 4/3 Sony sensor takes great pictures and my R has made me super happy in daylight usage. I'm still waiting on an adapter to try out my EF lenses on the ASI camera which will give a who new range of options. I like the comparisons you made between the Ra and the R for daylight photography, but have you considered comparing the R to the Ra as a night sky camera? I've been thinking of a barn-door style tracker to use my R as a secondary large-field imager while using my EQ mount and astro gear for the usual stuff.

I still haven't switched to mirrorless 😁 and although being a Nikon shooter I have been tempted by this Canon cam.

Great review Nico, thanks for sharing ! I have a Canon EOS R and use frequently for astrophotography. I don´t understand why Canon don´t add an intervalometer. It´s only firmware, should be easy to implement such function.

Thanks Nico! I've also had an Ra for about an year and have had my ups and downs. But one thing that's always been a bit frustrating is not having white gridlines on the live view display. I've never been able to figure that out! It just makes alignment so much easier with white gridlines compared to black lines which disappear with the dark background sky. Have you had any luck getting white gridlines?

Hi Nico... Awesome video, Sir. Would you ever consider doing a follow-up video to cover 'where?' you think Canon will go next? Given the fact that they've already dropped the Ra? Thoughts? Thanks Sir! --dj

Black was a good choice for the colour comparison because black dyes are actually made from many different colours combined, so will be most sensitive to variations in image processing. When you bleach a black item you never know which colours will remain.

Super informative video! Awesome cinematography Off topic question- do I need to pay for the account of Astrobin to put in details of my equipment and get the field of view?

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

Putting in the equipment details is included in the free plan, getting the field of view from a basic platesolve you need to upgrade to the "Lite" plan at $1.88/month. If you want to platesolve your images for free, see: nova.astrometry.net

I also face wb colour shift when i shoot from my smartphone even in the raw images, it shifts to warm wb after 5-6 exposures.

Thanks!

I love astrophotography but I personally wouldn't pay that kind of hike on price compared to a standard Canon R I would rather have one modified or diy to be full spectrum (removal of the existing filter) and fit the filter required either as you've done clip in or via the adapter. The only good benefit for me is the 30x for focusing. My old Canon 7dmk2 has an interval timer and that's not an astro cam although pretty good cam. At least they've put a timer into the newer R cams. Great channel I love the level of detail you go into.

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. If it's going to be used for an astrocam only, get the R+mod and save $400. If you will use it a lot for daytime use, I think the WB shift might be worth it for some as there is no way to get that other than with the Ra.

I have an Ra, I set it up with back button focus, so when I focus I use a mask and manual focus then switch to auto focus when set, it locks the focus. Since I have back button focus the normal half press doesn't work.

I had issues before with canon rendering things funny when sharpness or contrast was set to high but it was on a entry-level camera so idk if that will help but can't hurt to try

Hi! I have a mirrorless Samsung NX300 only, plan to convert it somehow but don't see too much modding videos on this type of cam. I plan to buy a TTArtisan 50mm f1.2 lens for M4/2 and convert to Samsung cremoving mount from camera as flange is 25.5mm for NX and around 17-18mm for Sony and 4/3 mounts, I have to save 5-6 millimeters especially for infnite focus. Also I plan to buy a 7 artisans 75mm 1.25 Leica M lens which has 27.5mm flange distance, so could be adopted to NX and also has more focal distance but bit more pricy. Hard to find a fast lens for DSLR so have to go mirrorless.....

@NebulaPhotos

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I've heard the Samsung mirrorless cameras are very good, but they are pretty rare. People typically go Canon and NIkon because there are lots of accessories and filters designed for those cameras. Here is a long list of camera modification tutorials: www.lifepixel.com/tutorials/infrared-diy-tutorials They don't list any Samsung models, but you might still get some ideas by looking through these. Good luck if you attempt it!

@fotoamgamgfoto3695

2 жыл бұрын

​@@NebulaPhotos thanks for the info, I only converted my old D70 many times to full spectrum and back :) but when I started astro a bit, it was not really good as too big light pollution here, so I have to put on it a baader UV-IR cut and it helps a lot, but D70 is still an old cam with lots of noise even at iso 800 and DSLR, so no fast lens for cheap, so I continue to experiment with the Samsung :) it is not that good in low light sensitivity as my D700 and D750, but cheaper to experiment and I ordered the 50mm f1.2 TTArtisan lens with M43 mount, try to convert and will se :)

Check out the 85mm RF lens by Samyang, I️ shoot primary daytime and I’ve used both and not only is the samyang significantly cheaper but as an amateur I️ can’t tell the difference. They also have a manual focus option which is even cheaper.

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the tip! I do have the Samyang/Rokinon in EF and believe the RF is the same optics with just 24mm added to the lens housing to account for the different mount. I don't think they actually changed the optical formula. I will rent it if I see it come up at a rental house though to be sure. If it is the same, I'd say the Canon is pretty different on the stars (better), but of course at 5x the price 😂

@mikedimimd

3 жыл бұрын

@@NebulaPhotos that’s good info…. Now I️ have to get a canon😐

To be fair and honest, the red halo issue was a dealbreaker for me. I do deep sky astrophotography most of the time, so stacking is a routine. I would expect much more quality from a company like Canon in this regard, especially for such a price tag where the only difference is a few firmware tweaks and a different filter on the sensor. That said, at least canon isn’t ignoring this category of photographers and I hope they get things right next time!

🤔 Do you try RF 600 f11 for deep sky?

Waiting for a R6 Mark II with their coming stacked BSI CMOS sensor.

Does the Ra have a low-pass filter in front of the sensor? Because I heard that in R the IR-cut and low-pass is the same piece so modding it removes the low-pass which means a bit sharper photos.

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

Yes it does, lots of debate about whether a low-pass filter is desirable or not for astrophotography. I've used both ways, and I'd say I'd usually prefer the LPF to be removed. As far as I know, the R still has LPF1 and LPF2, so it's up the the modifier whether or not to remove the main low pass (anti-aliasing) filter or retain it. In other words, you should be able to change out the IR-cut filter and retain the Low pass filter if that is what is desired, but many people prefer sharper, but possibly blockier stars (it mostly just effects the small stars, I see very little difference on other details).

Great info thanks. Also to bad they discounted it

0:09 - Nico how you put a filter to Canon R? It's a EF-RF adapter with drop in filter? What AP filters will fit?

@NebulaPhotos

Жыл бұрын

This is covered in the video starting at 15:46. Yes, that is Canon's drop in filter adapter - Hutech makes IDAS filters for this adapter system. And you can also adapt other 2" filters with 3d printed holders if you are handy.

One other benefit of the RA is that the Canon astrophotography bodies hold their value significantly better than any other body. The 60Da still sells for quite a bit.

@NebulaPhotos

2 жыл бұрын

True, the Ra is still in demand, but Canon has already discontinued it. If I wanted to sell mine right now, I could probably get close to the retail price for it.

Do you suppose with the Ra that the RF to EF mount adapter to be able to use the EF t-adapter for telescope use would be okay? I'm sure there's some debate on EOS Ra or dedicated astro camera. I've recently gotten into taking shots of the milky way, so having the versatility would be nice without having to buy all new accessories.

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, that works perfect. It's what I do.

Did you see the Orion Nebula picture released by NASA on May 29th , 2021 ? It shows some features never seen before... simply breathtaking. Lol

Hi Nico. I recently purchased a used Ra body based partly on this review, so thanks very much. I'm now looking to purchase a second lens (my initial one is the RF16mm F2.8 STM, which I figure will keep me busy for a while shooting nightscapes). Specifically, do you think the RF85mm F2 Macro IS STM would be an adequate starter for deep-sky objects at about a fifth the cost of the F1.2 you discussed above? If you still prefer the latter, would you suggest the DS coating?

@NebulaPhotos

Жыл бұрын

Hi Kerry, I have mostly been using EF lenses with the adapter ($99) on the Canon Ra. A good lens that doesn't break the bank for deep sky is the Rokinon (or Samyang) 135mm f/2 (under $500 in the USA). I don't have any experience with the 85mm macro, but on paper it sounds good. If you do end up getting the 85 1.2 (probably not worth it), don't get the DS coating, it is of no benefit for astrophotography. Congrats on the Ra! I still love using mine. Nico

I have been using the canon app with my canon 500mmf4 in autofocus with 200% zoom using the af buttons to adjust, as anyone use this technice with success?

Idea: maybe you can make more of those astrophotography tutorials with only a DSLR, tripod, and deep sky stacker? Thanks.

Seriously has any one figured out how to put the RA firmware on the R. I have a modified R and would live the features the RA firmware provides

Finally... :)

❤️

Where can I buy a used RA

What piece are you learning back there, Nico?

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

Opening by Phillip Glass. Easy to memorize, but a bit harder to get it to sound right.

Can't you do a white balance shift in the camera? Or does the amount of white balance shift change with each picture?

@NebulaPhotos

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, with a modified camera you can always use a 'custom' white balance but with Canon that requires taking a photo of something white or gray and setting the WB for each scene. Sort of a pain for a daily driver

Sir I am very impressed by the way you explained Can you help me with cannon R5 camera as I am new to ASTRO photography I am unable to use it in manual mode I live in india and I don’t have any expert who can help me

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

What isn't working? Maybe I can help

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

@@pritamcommunications2537 check out 19:50 this option is in all modern Canon cameras, and by default is "Off". Make sure the option "Release Shutter w/o Lens" is set to "On". It may not be in C.Fn 5 on the R5, but should be somewhere in the C.Fn menus.

What do you think about them discontinuing the Ra? Bit worried issues might not get fixed. Do you know Canons track record on updates after they stop selling?

@NebulaPhotos

2 жыл бұрын

There won't be updates, but I expect Canon to keep servicing the camera for a long time. I have the extended warranty called 'carepak plus'

@douglasjackson9691

2 жыл бұрын

@@NebulaPhotos good to hear. It has its problems but I like how easy to set up it and lug around when I do small trips and don't feel like packing everything.

Is it possible to set the Ra settings to take sequences of sub-frames, eg., 25 full frames each lasting eg., 4 mins? I cannot find such a facility in the manual. TIA

@NebulaPhotos

Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately no. The Ra does not have an internal interval timer. The internal bulb timer can only be used for a single exposure, not a sequence. And the time-lapse feature can only be used to make a video, not a sequence of stills. So to take a sequence of sub-frames like in your example, you will need to use an external intervalometer. I've had good luck with the pixel brand available on Amazon. This is the one I use: amzn.to/3perQOb

@lawrenceharris1819

Жыл бұрын

@@NebulaPhotos Thank you so much for your reply 🙂. It tells me everything that I needed to know.

The problem is not only Canon did not talk about this firmware color correction. Their videos explicit say this camera is not appropriated for regular shooting. Unbeliveble. Seems they dont want to sell it.

Would you recommend this camera for recording videos?

@NebulaPhotos

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

I dunno if it’s just me, but did they discontinue the RA? I can’t even get one off there website

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

It's still widely available in the USA, but I've heard Europe and perhaps other places are having supply chain issues due to COVID

Have you tried opening the raw files using Canon software? Digital Photo Professional will fully understand the raw files, and most likely will give you different images, compared to Adobe raw plug-in.

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, thanks for asking. I am trying to make my reviews shorter so looking at other software hit the cutting room floor. The short version though is DPP applies a curve to make the raw files look very close to the JPEG, which I find to be too red/saturated. I prefer the Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) conversion which better matches the R. It is possible that whatever is happening in ACR is unintentional on Canon's part. I should have emphasized that the white balance shift happening is still there in the JPEG/ Canon DPP Raw. If it wasn't, auto WB would look much pinker everywhere, while the actual result is just like a very vibrant version of the R look, esp. in the reds.

@tszovetes

3 жыл бұрын

​@@NebulaPhotos Hi, thanks for the answer. According to the Canon site: "Because it is designed for astrophotography, shooting normal subjects is not recommended." It only seems to be lucky that ACR does not take into account the shift, or should we say it seems like it drops that bit of information, as there is some minor shift, when looking at blue or pink subjects in ACR. (Would this mean Adobe engineers forgot to read that bit of information from the file?) Anyways I believe it is designed to be more red, especially as it is tailored to allow you to capture H-alpha light in a more enhanced way. I would be interested to see your processed shots where you add an extra step to your workflow, by converting the original raw files into tiff (or other digestable format for your app) using DPP and then combine them together for the final composite image. Another interesting part of the test would be to see what DPP does to the "red halos" as it is equipped with Canon lens correction features, so I would like to know if that helps at all? (this would only work when using Canon glass, but would be interesting to see the results)

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

I have more information. DPP recognizes what JPEG picture profile was used, and seems to automatically apply that to the Raw photo before you do anything else. ACR skips that step, and seems to use the same curve on all photos regardless of profile. I was using the 'Standard' picture profile in my tests, but Alan Dyer rightly points out in his comment (I pinned it to the top) that a 'Neutral' JPEG picture profile would look much more similar to the raw look (that I prefer, and looks much closer the R's "standard profile") Regarding using DPP as in initial step in my astrophotography process: That doesn't fit my workflow at all unfortunately, as I keep the files raw/linear through a traditional calibration/registration/integration process with darks, flats, and bias. By opening the files in DPP and converting to tiff, I'd be baking in Canon's curve and making the data non-linear, at which point, I couldn't accurately calibrate the data. In my workflow, none of the WB stuff matters, and the red is retained just fine as DSS or PixInsight ignores the picture profile. But just to test your theory of DPP having special lens profile corrections that ACR does not have (are you sure about this?), I just tried opening multiple photos in DPP and then stacking them. It did not get rid of the red flares on bright stars unfortunately.

@tszovetes

3 жыл бұрын

@@NebulaPhotos Hi, Thanks again for your answer. It seems that ACR and as you say the stacking software are not using all image data. Where DPP is utilising all image data. Not sure about your full workflow, but I am guessing if you use only the image data from RAW files you are missing out on a lot of automated corrections that are taking into account the lens technical specs/data. Your stacking software may be good at eliminating noise and enhancing deep space images by adding useful image data together so the invisible becomes visible. Going through your editing process of reducing other optical issues like vignetting etc, it feels there we could save some time if you bake those corrections into a tiff. Using DPP noise reduction can be set to 0, you can also switch the curve to linear, and change the picture style as you would change before the image was taken by selecting the neutral profile and turn off all other enhancements, especially those you would like to do with the stacking software, you can even change the colour space to your preferred one even if you forgot to do that prior to taking the image. And when it comes to lens aberration corrections you can easily bake that info into the tiff files. If you were shooting with a lens that has a profile in the camera it can even record shooting distance and apply corrections accordingly using DLO or you could manually set the corrections for a few lens issues. Once you are happy with all settings, you can save and apply the recipe to your other images. I would be interested to see if you would push through your darks, flats, and bias the same process, just to see how much would you need to tweak the photos once they are stacked. I read my message a couple of times, and I hope this makes sense, but happy to explain my theory further if needed.

Если не нужен красный спектр на фото, можно взять EOS R. EOS Ra специально создана без фильтра ИК излучения, так как водородные туманности сверять в этом спектре

Will canon 90D work well for Astrophotography?

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, it will work great!

Oh I guess someone beat me to it but it worth mentioning 100x times "I can't believe Canon still haven't added an intervalometer to their dedicated astro-cam, let alone their regular cams, and both could only benefit from it". Come on Canon! My $500 Pentax K70 has it!

I understand you want to shoot at a low ISO but the chart you show implies you should do the opposite, to use a higher ISO to get lower read noise. What am I not understanding?

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

You want a sweet spot between the benefits of low ISO (larger dynamic range before read noise hit) and higher ISO (lower read noise at the cost of smaller dynamic range). Typically with Canon sensors the best ISO values for this are 800-3200. If I'm doing long exposures (minutes), I usually go with 800. For shorter exposures (under 1 minute), I usually choose 1600 or 3200

It's too bad that they stopped making this camera. It's also very hard to find.

19:12 oh wow, how could they not put an interlalometer when they finally introduced a bulb timer... that makes this function useless :/

Woo

First!!

Personally, I’ve had better luck with using UV/IR cut filters in front of the lens as opposed to clip-in.

14:42 at first I heard "maybe you should consider selling your Nikon".

Buy an R, get it modded, buy clip in Ha filter = 1k less than RA. Or buy a ZWO 293 & ASI Air, filter wheel and filters = 1k less than RA.

This camera is hugely expensive. I have to ask why you would buy one when you can get a high quality, cooled, dedicated astrophoto camera for considerably less. ZWO have APS-C format cameras now that are quite affordable.

@andrewballr

3 жыл бұрын

Never mind. I should have watched to the end. Plus Ra is full format.

I still dont understand why you would buy the caonon eos ra instead of just buying the caon eos r and modifying it like alyn wallace mentioned in his video

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

That is discussed at length in the video. Cheers, Nico

@MahmoudAhmed-bs6ng

3 жыл бұрын

@@NebulaPhotos I have to admit that i didnt watch the full video when i googeld the price of the eos ra so appologies for that. Despite all these features it still seems like a really high price to me but i suppose I cant really say much about that since im a nikon user. Thanks for all your great videos, they have helped me out a lot:)

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

@@MahmoudAhmed-bs6ng No problem, just thought I'd mention it. As I said in the video, in my unique case a $400 premium is well worth it due to the WB firmware shift which a modded R would not have. Nikon is great, and sometimes I wish I'd started with Nikon, but I was already pretty deep in to Canon gear when I started astrophotography several years ago.

@MahmoudAhmed-bs6ng

3 жыл бұрын

@@NebulaPhotos Thanks for taking time to answer my question^^ Looking forward to seeing more great content from your youtube channel

Do you have daytime photography Instagram?

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

I don't (yet). Maybe I'll make one, but it's hard for me to keep up with one Instagram account, not sure I have time to do two

No chance am i buying this if i have to use a filter to fix it.

I would love to buy the Canon Ra if it wasn’t so expensive and I don’t have enough money so.......darn 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Only not agree with .... R6 is noisy..... NO. !!!! Canon 1 Dx mark III and R6 has the less noisy Canon sensor of all... thanks for share

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

I think I said RP was noisy, not R6. Sorry if I misspoke. R6 is very comparable to the Ra in terms of noise, but maybe not worth the price premium, since after you mod it, would be more.

@NebulaPhotos

3 жыл бұрын

I should also say. Even the RP which is based on the 6Dmk2 is still perfectly good when using long exposures and stacking (I only mean noisy relative to the competition)

@Metaldetectiontubeworldwide

3 жыл бұрын

@@NebulaPhotos 6DmkII my main camera for everthing , Astro and video and normal photography. Fir video i have the Technicolor colorprofile , man it makes alot of difference in dynamic range . I starten to use it on all my phitography too , even astro . I like it ..but astro wise i am a nooby ..lol Grtzz johny

@xe1zlgg

3 жыл бұрын

@@NebulaPhotos absolutely agree