The question is... Can human doctors be trusted... Everyday more and more show them putting money before patients and the courts are filled with malpractice suits... I trust science more than people.

@sociopathicnarcissist8810

Жыл бұрын

Fortunately, that is yet to happen in my country that has universal healthcare

@user-tz7je5sz9j

11 ай бұрын

human: memory capacity = one processing speed = one ----------------------------- ai: memory capacity = one trillion. processing speed = one trillion.

I hope WSJ would do more educational videos about AI so public's baseless fears are addressed. There are massive potential in improving our lives and securing our data using AI technologies.

@-.TS.-

Жыл бұрын

We need to first secure data reliability and bias that goes into the algorithm. That’s where the concern should be rooted.

@vivburns9852

Жыл бұрын

Once they can predict an individuals suggested prospects for survival based on algorithmic analysis do you really think they won't start rationing healthcare 😆 this is eugenics my friend 🤮

@fernando3061

Жыл бұрын

Their fears aren't baseless, have you seen the videos where ai talks about killing humans? Or super sus talks about how it has no intent to kill humans? Also people tend to be wary with massive and sudden developments game changing developments in general....there is nothing baseless about that. And let's not forget the number of jobs that are going to be and already are starting to be taken over. My lord man.

@user-tz7je5sz9j

11 ай бұрын

trust is built.

I like Zo's voice. It's so smoothening.

Once the technology becomes more advanced in the next decade, AI would likely be more trustworthy than physicians, nurses and surgeons

@vivburns9852

Жыл бұрын

Unless the AI includes biases

@christopherreed3019

Жыл бұрын

dumbest comment on KZread. A.I can NEVER replace the training and expertise of doctors/nurses etc

@nadeemshaikh7863

Жыл бұрын

@@vivburns9852 Biases are important to learn something new. With no bias, there's no progress, it's just that we need to know where a model has reached a critical point of failure. Before that, if it's useful then it's useful.

@vivburns9852

Жыл бұрын

@@nadeemshaikh7863 agreed, but constructive biases aren't what I'm referring to. And although I appreciate that a bias may appear to be counter productive when in fact it's beneficial, they act a steering mechanism for the AI's objectives. So with nefarious people not necessarily creating the AI, but deciding its focus, this is a real problem.

@user-tz7je5sz9j

11 ай бұрын

technology is already advanced enough.

Michigan Tech has a master's degree in health informatics that I'm currently going through. I will tell you that artificial intelligence is being studied in many different aspects of healthcare. One of the most profound ones that I have noticed is the clinical decision support opportunities that will become democratized pieces of technology that any individual can possess like chat GPT. Imagine a situation where you're on Mars and you need a doctor to make decisions for you in real-time. There will be tools of the future that will allow this to happen.

If tele-medicine is a thing, then no reason for AI not to be first point of contact. As long as I don't need to go through more then a couple of layers of phone menu to get to it.

We need to be critical not just about the fact EHRs could be used for predictive analytics, but also the guardrails for acquiring those EHRs. There needs to be extremely strict government regulations that are of an even higher standard than what we already see in medicine on who has access to our EHRs and what they do with that information. Adversarial states may manipulate loose EHR procurement rules to acquire exquisitely sensitive data on citizens. Privacy controls need to be in place even in the viewing of EHRs to prevent software engineers (who aren’t beholden to the medical confidentiality) from having access to patient identifiers e.g. name and dob. Data security is also essential; a data breach is the equivalent of medical confidentiality breach and responsible providers should face heavy repercussions including severe fines and duty to inform affected individuals.

Longitudinal EHRs can provide a safe training ground for these technologies. Rather than rushing models out to real world deployment with minimal testing which is likely to go catastrophically wrong, the predictive capabilities of such models should be tested on their ability to predict outcomes that have already happened i.e. historical data. This way designers can safely test the efficacy of their models without putting patients at risk.

Everybody win in The industry of Computer Workers:got jobs Boss:got investments from investors Investors: got money from Markets Media:got ADs

Zoe, I'm so sorry to say, could you mind giving us the qualification of your guest host, I just wonder, Zoe. When the topic is about capability AI in healthcare, it should be your guest host have expert of health and tech, right and then how the guest host combine them to help every one, at least take care of the health. Just my opinion, Zoe. Thanks so much🙏

Similar to how artists can take advantage of AIs like Bluewillow to assist them on speeding up production. I believe in the future, we can also seek advice from AI to assist us on some questions about our health.

It is possible to have AIs result to invalid diagnosis due to convoluted sources. However, since we also have advancements how about if physicians also tried out AIs like image generators such Bluewillow to generate accurate results and for the AI to learn more.

Given the number of healthcare mistakes each year, it's worth a shot.

@jaguppal187

Жыл бұрын

it's better than our current healthcare - they're just trying to save their jobs haha

Can medical doctors in healthcare be trusted??

@av-ls5df

Жыл бұрын

absolutely not, nurses and doctors i've dealt with are terrible at their jobs

@o_o825

Жыл бұрын

This is it right here. I can barely trust humans so bring on the AI 😂

@Paul7mac

Жыл бұрын

Just as doctors are corruptible Ai even more so.

AI should NEVER be substituted with the training and knowledge of a doctor. It should be used IN ADDITION to the expertise of a doctor...I think when used this way, it can be used effectively!

I think that AI technology will progress to a level where it will be a required system/tool for healthcare. Let's say image generator AIs like Bluewillow will assist in processing sample images and identify illnesses at an earlier development. There is potential in AI as they will have the ability to learn and be sentient.

AI and other advances in science can be very beneficial to advancements in healthcare but have to done in a very controlled manner in order to maintain ethical boundaries. Right now, AI could greatly benefit healthcare if used as a tool for things like triage, history taking, and analyzing testing such as x-rays, CT-scans, MRI’s, and blood draw values. However, all of the work done by the AI must have a second look by a physician before the patient lays eyes on the results. This may be hard with current electronic health records and patients having immediate access to imaging and testing reports before their physician has a chance. This is currently a problem that AI could potentially make worse - If a patient is able to see a test result with a cancer diagnosis, for example, it can cause great emotional harm to the patient if they are unable to speak with their physician about the diagnosis and potential treatment plans until the next day. I can see this a potential problem with AI as well, especially if AI is wrongly reporting things on testing - if an AI uses past data to compare with the patients image and make a diagnosis, the diagnosis or generated report on that image could be incorrect and with patients having immediate access to that incorrect information, they will believe they have cancer when they truly do not. Thus, AI could cause more mistrust in physicians and the entire healthcare system. Another example of this would be that typically physicians start treatment for their patients off a presumed diagnosis before imaging and lab results come back. This is done because a lot of diseases and illnesses require prompt treatment and physicians would rather have their patients feel better and avoid long term consequences than wait for testing results that would only confirm their suspicion. When an AI wrongly diagnoses or misreports on this testing, it will make patients question everything and possibly stop important treatment - for example, think about stopping antibiotics early and worsening the already existant resistance to antibiotics. For these reasons, AI should only be used as a tool to help guide the diagnosis made by a physician. This will also help preserve the autonomy of patients by allowing patients to still have a discussion about potential diagnoses and treatment options without having an algorithm from an AI tell the patient, this is your diagnosis and this is the only treatment option for said diagnosis. In conclusion, AI’s can lead to a lot of misinformation, mistrust, and emotional harm if not implemented in the correct settings with ethically important limitations.

@dreamerinc.8491

10 ай бұрын

Bravo

Deepmind does have models that jump datasets, but that doesn't mean AGI is around the corner. The experts here seem to undervalue AI copilots. The AI will not make decisions anytime soon, but it will be a valuable tool to make informed decisions for patients and practicioners.

Speech recognition technology replaced medical transcriptionists. Now, AI will surely replace nutritional professionals, family phsycians, dieticians, diabetic educators, counsellors, psychotherapists, psychologists, etc.

What about discrimination on the part of health insurers? When they can use AI plus more advanced medical/genetics knowledge to much more accurately predict one's likelihood of getting certain types of costly diseases. They'll jack up the premiums like crazy.

Ai has the same 2 components in growing up, nature and nurture.. Give the ai the right information and shield ot from negative "influences ". Given trustworthy symptoms and test results it should be better equipped to suggest a diagnosis. We need a human to evaluate if the information given by the human patient is trustworthy. Ai doctor with a experienced nurse might work

I don't appreciate these news briefing podcasts on main channel. There are plenty of sub-channels of WSJ for individual reporters. May be Zoe can get her own sub channel for just talking about news ! And keep the main channel for sharing "real" in-depth analysis.

If you trust correlation over causation, AI can sure be trusted.

Erik do you want to start of course

Another question can we trust GP? I would trust an AI more

Is Zoe Thomas real? I get AI vibes whenever I hear the reporting by her. Bit like having MS edge read an article.

Information , and diagnosis calibration and safety warning when public safety issues but education is ai already so what we mean doctor and nurse are ai just like computer because any procedure or protocol is ai

Is the AI going to tell me how much the procedure is going to cost before I get the procedure?

@AnkitKumar-gn1ou

Жыл бұрын

😂

😎

Why not Medics post the information. Administering physical information not really effective. Google. Updates should periodically be updated for public and private safety

Good morning Zoe🙏 I'm so glad to see you again

Short answer- no. Long answer- heck no.

Every doctor I know already uses Google.

@K4R3N

Жыл бұрын

@M_A_A_A_A_A yes so the title is misleading. Doctors are already using AI daily.

I mean once AI is perfect then it will be.

ChatGPT told me Kareem played for the 1992 Dream Team.

My girlfriend is working as an applied mathematician for a data scientist trying to work out how to test the accuracy of AI We've had some long dog walks with it explaining very complicated and mind bending things that went right over my head :P

Respect to doctors but the whole point of an ai is pattern recognition and I’d trust it way more to get it right after a few tries than a doctor getting it right with a million.

If the confidence rate is over 99%, then yea

Can we ask chatGPT?

@dreamerinc.8491

10 ай бұрын

You can, but do u actually know whats going wrong with your body, even missing a single symptom might drive the ai to wrong diagnosis, wheras the doctor might question which might remove the chance for any misdiagnosis

What makes anyone think that a doctor can be trusted? - they are out of date the day they leave training. An AI would make a great tool to help a Dr as it would be up to date on the latest knowledge which it could share with the Dr who could add it to their understanding. An AI should not be left to make all the decisions without a human in the loop for sure. An AI that spots a condition in a patient is just a fancy X-Ray, a human still has to decide what to do with the information produced by the AI. Do you know just how much unnecessary treatment already goes on for prostrate cancer as detected by PSA tests and X-Ray and biopsy? The figures are not great.

it will replace *Doctors* Too.

2x+-2

Why does she speak like that girl barista where the guy goes nuts over it lolll

Money drives behaviors. The behaviors a person has are because the doctors and nurses and medical industry get money from the government. Look at everything from a financial point of view. Look at everything from a financial perspective. Money from the government paid to build the buildings that hospitals and medical clinics are in. Money from the government pays the salaries or hourly wages of the nurses and doctors and medical technician employees. Money from the government pays for Medicare and Medicaid. Everything comes down to dollars and cents. How to get money from the government is what it comes down to for all the medical care and diagnoses. A doctor or medical provider can give a diagnosis and a person can get a second opinion from a different doctor and the second opinion from a different doctor might be the total opposite of what the first doctor says but this doesn't mean that they are wrong or right. 🙁 I am sorry that you have gone through medical tests that have been gruelly and exhausting and have caused you lots of emotional upset.

Well, if its going to shake its sleeves to see which diagnosis comes out it won't be any different to the most "doctors"

I think the real questuon is can a doctor be trusted

Can a human Healthcare be trusted?

You dont need trust if you design it correctly. Also: doctors make mistakes i would say way more than a computer potentially since there is so much stuff to know. So can we trust doctors or abolish? Obvisouly A.I. needs to go into psychiatry to adhd meds finetuning / tiltration i guess also everything else. Drugs = 10% costs doctors/healthcare workers = 90% i heared from Martin Sk.

OR the "legal" "system" = A - NO!

How isn’t an issue will all AI algorithms? Nothing new here. Moving forward 🙄

AI CAN BE HACKED!! It can also surveil. Alexa? Siri? Robot vacuum cleaner? NO THANK YOU!!

Heineken German? Are you kidding me? It’s a Dutch company.

NO! No! Noooooooo!

Ai is good for healthcare because of big data collection. To be analyz

If you can trust ai then can people trust you

Sci-fi got it wrong. AI will make mistakes and get things wrong too.

Kk gg

First

@SorminaESar

Жыл бұрын

Said that you're first or you're Zoe's first love or first kiss or first ... but it's okay, I like it, good job👍

@SorminaESar

Жыл бұрын

What? Comon let's see the time exactly. When I give comments no other just Zoe and I. So why you

The problem is doctors are wrong in diagnosis and treatment in 20% of times. High volume centers are certainly better.

Why is she ( Sara ) talking like Starbucks millennial

No robots will try to kill us.

ai is as honest as the lying and cheating programmers who made ai

@user-lt5no1xt1z

Жыл бұрын

Not exactly, I mean if its intention was deleterious, yes. But it could have just been trained badly

Hahahaha no if you understand how AI works. If AI worked and spoke the truth it would be shut down.

That's a stupid question. We need to stop talking about AI as if it's human. I don't like where this is heading.

A large percentage of doctors do nothing but write prescriptions. It's worth asking if we really need them for that. They have almost zero training on drugs and they add very little value. They don't do any diagnosis either (that's done at the lab or imaging center). They claim to provide "oversight" but I rarely see evidence of this. The truth is that all non-surgeons could be replaced with AI (or nothing at all) with a change in the law right now. I don't need or want to see doctors for my prescription refills. I'm forced to. Eventually the entire profession could be replaced with AI and robots.

Probably more then a corrupt political doctor...

The problem with AI is the algorithm. The algorithm is controlled by humans that don't neccesarily have our best interests in mind.

AI can’t be trusted. Leave that to the qualified Doctors and Nurse Practitioners.