"...there is no conclusion." Brilliant. That's 20 minutes of my life I want back.

@TheSlantedLens

6 жыл бұрын

It's all relative and really depends on what you're looking for. In conclusion, there are many possible choices! You are the one to decide what is right for you

@gabangisvisuals378

4 жыл бұрын

Your conclusion is the conclusion.

Her expression on her face... "I have no clue what they are talking about, oh well I'll just sit here and smile" 😂

Basically even five year old camera can give you great images if you can't get good images with any of these cameras blame yourself.

@anil1svnit

6 жыл бұрын

Hi Tomas, its the story which makes an image camera actually is only 10 -15 % of final image.. But that said when we are buying a camera we should expect a camera manufacturer to give us their best as we will give our best to our clients, Now what I do want to point out is 6D2 which has royally pissed me off. Its jury rigged product which should not have been made and would/will give me poorer return for my hard earned money.. So to all I would really recommend to go for cheapest relevant camera and get the best lens.. I don't know why I wrote this..

@TomasRamoska

6 жыл бұрын

Anil Maurya I completely agree with you about Canon 6D Mark II. Unfortunately it's no good choice right now from Canon you have to go for 5D Mark IV if you want to good pro camera.

@truknayr23

6 жыл бұрын

@Anil: It's called business Anil. If Canon puts all the goods on the 6Dmk2 who the hell is crazy enough to buy the 5D4 and the 1Dx2 you get what i mean? Reason why the 6Dmk2 is a single SD camera as to the dual card slot of the 5D4 that is reason enough for pros to buy the 5D4... the 1Dx has the full 4k capability as to the cropped 4k of the 5D4 it's not that they're cheating it just business.

@anil1svnit

6 жыл бұрын

truknayr23 I know, and its the business with me.. So they lost me to A7R2 .. I am extremely happy with that camera.

@truknayr23

5 жыл бұрын

@@anil1svnit Fast forward to this year! hahaha 6Dmk2 is actually selling like crazy. Canon did not miss you one bit.

ooooh...good question!

it's a shame this video didn't discuss the IBIS that the SONY A7ii has. this is also the reason I as a 'young student starting out' chose for the A7ii because I can use my vintage Olympus Zuiko lenses with an adaptor and make use of the IBIS.

@trisv1974

5 жыл бұрын

Dont drop the camera by any means, sometimes your camera just takes some damage when you are working and the canon cameras are built like bricks, my assistant drop my 5dmk2 right of an open rucksack to the sideway and nothing happend just a little scratch, i rather use a rig, or a stabilizer but go for a camera built like a tank.

@sydbailey1320

4 жыл бұрын

@@trisv1974 my a7ii fell of a tripod then proceeded to roll down some stairs. Both lens and camera survived the fall (Nikon 50 1.4 ai). They may not be made as tanky as DSLRs but they aren't legos either.

@sydbailey1320

4 жыл бұрын

Like IS is image stabilization in a lens , IBIS stands for in body image stabilization. So basically stabilazation within the camera body

@adrianastro1

4 жыл бұрын

@R-77 I don't film often but for pictures, it makes images even sharper for hand-held shots. Without having to spend extra money on lenses with image stabilization it's really nice. It makes night-time or evening photoshoots even more doable if you don't have a tripod

a good comparison video. thank you all and keep it up.

A7ii is sharp

@fbmnl3466

4 жыл бұрын

Yes! ❤️

The A7II is moisture and dust resistant. Also, I think a "little" more people would choose the EVF over the GPS. Too bad you missed out the D750 from the comparison.

@RajSharma-zj2tt

2 жыл бұрын

Agree D750 is a workforce

This is why I just got a 5DII when I upgraded to full frame. Even with a camera that old, basically the same image quality as a 5DIII up to ISO 400 or so... more than good enough. Although the focusing situation does suck. Though, you really can't pull up the shadows as much as with a 5DIII. That's fine if you know lighting and how to get your exposure right.

I personally haven't had any issues with the focus on my 6D Mark ii. In fact I find it to be one of the standouts on the camera. It's true that it has a little more contrast, so I dial it back by one. Against the 5D mark iii it has more magenta, but in general I've found the colours to be great. I believe the 6D Mark ii is sharper, and I do believe it's a little better in noise performance. And for the record I have a 5D ii 2x 5D iii and the 6D ii. So definitely had a good look at the difference. 6D ii is with me every day, even in 2020 I'm not ready for mirrorless and none of these camera's are dead yet. (5D mark ii still rocks)

@TheSlantedLens

4 жыл бұрын

You definitely know your stuff. Thanks for sharing your views.

That's reassuring - I just bought the 6D2.

I would go for 6d mark1(even second hand) and some better lens or two for $2000...that will give you more options than just the body for that amount. It's all about the skill and lens anyway...every body produced since 5d mark 1 will make a very god photo if you know how to shoot.

I've come to realize I am so old school. I started with my Dad's Minolta SRT-201 and his Minolta X-9 SLR's in the late 90's. I am still used to focusing what I want to take a photo of using the center focus point. Then moving it slightly to the left or right to properly frame it. I end up just setting my foucid point on the center and being done with it. In fact I still use those old MD mount Minolta lenses on my Canon DSLR's using an adapter.

Still in love with my 6D

I honestly thought my 5D III was far from competition against the a7rii and the 6d2, so glad I watched this :) propably saved me a lot 👍

Nice video. 5D MkII in my opinión it's off the competition. ¿More expensive, heavier, and older processor? Next. Between this 3 options i'll go with the 6D MkII

Yep the A7 2 is my favourite . I also understand I can use canon lenses on the A7 and pretty much any lens I want FD Aswell as far batteries concerned bring extra? Thanks for this video very helpful

This was a helpful video, and I enjoyed watching it. However, contrary to a couple of tangential statements, the 7D Mark II has GPS built in. The 5D Mark IV has WiFi.

As many have said, there are lots of other options, Pentax K1, Nikon D750, Second hand D810 or D800. With the Pentax and Nikon both being new. I would also contend that the sensor in any of these cameras would be as good athe any of the camera, you have listed.

One thing to consider is the lens-choice and also the price of it! There are a LOT of great canon lenses that are quite affordable, especially used. Good Sony lenses are still rare and quite expensive. Of course you can use adapters, but most of the time with some compromises in usability/autofocus/reliability and such..

Don't forget the D750!

Im confused...a7r2 in the description and is a7ii in the title...

I really like your channel. You've provin to be non biased and gave a nice honest review of all three cameras. I already own the 5D3 But want something full frame that will auto focus on video. The 6D is my cheapest option. I just can't afford the EOS-R or the 5D4. I remember when some Indi Feature film makers where going wild ober using the 5D2 to make feauture films. Such as "The Silent House" and "Like Crazy" I prefer video production as well. That's why I bought the 5D3. But sometimes I just want to use my DSLR like a camcorder and let it do the focusing for me. Because it's not like I'm shooting a film and need to block a shot. Can't wait to see more of your videos.

Please do a comparison between the 6D Mark ii and the Nikon D750 for image quality mainly!!

I was looking for an upgrade from the original 7D, and was waiting for the 6D2, but the moment I heard it had 1 card slot, I ordered a 5d3 almost immediately because of the dual card slots, a widerish AF spread and I was not going to support Canon by buying the 5D4 and wait for the 5D5 (unless thats also a disappointment.)

I still shoot with the 5DIII, in fact because I have upper body difficulties that make me clumsy I use a 5DII for landscapes, and I can officially report that the 5DII bounces well. It also lets me concentrate on my photography rather than worrying about damaging my camera. I think that camera should have been another entrant as a first full frame camera. To me if the camera gives you pleasure, you get great prints out of them and you can afford it, without crippling debt, then it’s the right camera for you. However, if I was buying my first full frame camera I think I’d go for the 6DII purely because it’s the most up to date technology from Canon and the choices of lenses available, but I’d also watch out for firmware updates. If I was advising anyone though I can only say what I know which is the 5DIII, but I’d suggest looking at the reviews online but avoid the comments under the KZread videos as these can be very vitriolic and infantile. I would suggest listening to people like yourself, who has been a successful photographer for many years and knows what he is talking about. I would also suggest watching you series about light, but that is a total aside. I think when people are spending a couple of thousand pounds they shouldn’t rush with a first purchase into that arena. Another factor to consider, if this is their first full frame camera, is have they previously had a cropped sensor camera, have they invested in a lot of glass and do they intend keeping it. So if they previously had a 80D they want to keep then it would be better to stay with Canon rather than the Sony. I know my 7DII has GPS, but it really it really eats into the battery and I always forget to turn it on. Gosh your audio must be amazing, I hid under the table when I heard the sirens, I thought they were outside my home coming for me. Another fantastic video, with sound common sense.

I have had both- love the fully articulating screen and the menu system on the Canon.

@TheSlantedLens

2 жыл бұрын

Good to hear. Thanks for sharing!

Great video.. But I hope to enroll the Nikon too..

If you want to compare... Please compose same frames

All of these are great cameras, but I personally decided to pony up a bit more money, and go for the Sony A99 II. Fantastic camera, 42MP at 12FPS, and a lot of good native Sony and Minolta a-mount lenses.

Which one better for photo ???

Great video, I would love for you guys to do a prints video as part 2 of this series see how they would compare ultimately if we want to hang images on our walls instead of just keeping all this photos on our screens i.e. a glossy, luster, and a fine art paper (lead the way you choose the paper brand) some sizes for home display like 11x14, 16x20, and 20x30 something conservative that would look polished. Thank you and hope you can make this happen see you at Sammy's 😊

@TheSlantedLens

6 жыл бұрын

That's an interesting idea, Noel! Thanks! I'll see what I can come up with!

You should compare with their native 50 f1.8s.

can you please link us the raw files of the 3 cameras? thanks guys

Small correction: @9:36 5D mark4 has GPS and Wifi/NFC built in.

@multifayzer8130

5 жыл бұрын

The mark 4 wasnt in this vid because its 1000-1500 dollars over the other cameras

@gregoryluna535

4 жыл бұрын

His reference was to their comment that even the mark iv doesn't have gps or wifi.

Great comparison. With similar picture quality, battery life, flip screen and weather sealing are most important to me.

@TheSlantedLens

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely. Thanks for watching the camera comparison!

I have the 5d mark 3. Still going strong

I think the pink in 6D2 is a problem in Lightroom, in Photoshop with Raw 9.12.1 is this not exist (LR has 9.12).

we want a video about Nikon D750 , Please .

I have owned all 3 cameras, and I personally like the Canon 6d markii

@adhyantorokusumo7451

6 жыл бұрын

F G which one has the best picture?

@erickalfaro7998

6 жыл бұрын

Adhyantoro Kusumo that honestly depends on your style of photography. All cameras are exceptional in photo quality, but it's whatever you prefer.

@cesaremmanuel2393

5 жыл бұрын

F G me too! My favorite so far canon 6d mark ii

How does the Canon EOS RP compare to these cameras? Especially the Sony A7 ii since they are both mirrorless and will take Canon glass and have more spread out focus points.? I currently have an original Canon 6D. I take a lot of low light band shots and need ISO 6400 performance, fast auto focus, and good dynamic range.

do you make custom profiles with the color chart for every scenario and camera? and if not... why not? I always make color profiles the eliminate as much "lens/sensor" color bias.

Heard a lot about the 6d mark ii being bad with focus but I shoot portraits where the subject will be around the middle anyway, so the 6d mark ii is a steal for me. Only thing I'm still trying to figure out is if the eos rp is better than the 6d mark ii.

@TheSlantedLens

4 жыл бұрын

That decision is based on the lenses you have and the direction you want to go. If you want to move to RF lenses then the rp is the best choice. It's the best direction for the future. Good Luck. You can't go wrong.

You did not mention the IBIS in the Sony System

I’d absolutely go for the 5D mk III, it has more spread autofocus points, higher fps, similar price point and a heavy duty construction that can take anything

@jeffreymliss

6 жыл бұрын

I agree. I own one and am considering getting a second one.

@jeepjoseph9036

4 жыл бұрын

The a7ll I believe does

@sergioserramusic

4 жыл бұрын

Jeep Joseph in the end I went for the 6D2 because cheap and I’m not disappointed

Thank you

@TheSlantedLens

Жыл бұрын

You're welcome, thanks for watching!

sorry to disagree gentlemen, thank you for the video btw.. love all your videos. I have the 5d3 but the mk4- was such a disappoint that I decided instead to take that money and buy the a7ii instead of the mk4, to boot for the same money I also got a godox 4 speedlight wireless system and a strobe, two triggers one canon one Sony, then I got the 50mm art with the mc11 kit it was a steal I got it for about $50 more than the lens alone, throw in 4 extra batteries and the battery grip all for the price of the canon mk4 which came out with DR already in the mid teens of dxomark falling way behind 2+ year older cameras. the a7ii quickly became my main camera, and relegated the mk3 to back up. The 5axis, manual focus assist, focus peaking, zebras, WiFi, remote control, and so many more features including the ability to customize the buttons to my exact shooting style obliterated.. the canon.the dynamic range, i could never pull the shadows back or recover highlights on the canons without suffering severe banding and so many other artifacts. I use the Tamron trinity adapted with the mc11.. except for the 70-200mm in low light the others are bang on. and even then as soon as it starts to hunt, i just start turning the manual focus ring, and the focus peaking with the manual assist kicks on and bang I am there can even magnify at that point to confirm. I have never missed a shot yet. I was so impressed I went out and bought the a7rii. My other complaint with the video was if you are going to mention used prices than the Sony a7ii' s used price is extremely low, which doesn't make it even close. once you use an evf it is hard to go back to the meter even tho I was very good at judging the scene with the mk3. why guess? when you can nail it exactly the way you want the first time. When Canon releases the 6dii with lower DR and iso performance than its predecessor the 6d, it proves Canon is falling way behind in the sensor game. Wait till the next round of Sony a7's or a9's the gap will be gargantuan. I was a major canon fan when they wanted to be the best.. they no longer aim for that. Their last remaining areas of photography where they lead will be gone in the next few years, they are losing out on bodies, lenses, customers.. like the others I to would've liked to have seen the Nikons in there also, not to mention the Pentax k1 also fits the 2k range although I appreciate that would be a stretch... thanks again gentlemen, even tho I don't think the testing was scientific.. we did appreciate the effort.

@navpreetsingh8156

5 жыл бұрын

So you went from a 5d3 to a7ii and thought it was a upgrade? I don't think you had a 5d3

@Ruck.Norris

5 жыл бұрын

Lots of specs and gear. I find that specs don't line up with photo quality. If you really want to get your point across, you should make a similar video.

@CO8848_2

5 жыл бұрын

Don't own these 3, but the images in this video shows 6dii is crap actually. I think these guys eyes have problems; that pink ground in the last comparison should give you all kinds of alarms if you claim to be "professional". And I am not a Sony fanboy. I bought rx100iv on friend's advice and thought it was a piece of shit in color, always blue somehow, and sold it, and prefered the much cheaper Canon powershot s100, (that one's color is also fake but more pleasing).

@neovo903

5 жыл бұрын

@@CO8848_2 Akki Moto 1 year ago The pink in 6D2 is a problem with Lightroom. In Photoshop with RAW 9.12.1 is this no longer exist.

Which lens are used?

Why would you use the same lens?

Hey Jay, the 5D IV DOES have WiFi! :)

@multifayzer8130

5 жыл бұрын

And is double the price :)

Nice work guys

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks Alexandre! We post camera comparisons every month. Got any suggestions for the next months that you would be interested in seeing?

@Alexandre99995

5 жыл бұрын

i don´t know, i have 6dii, but i would like to see 1dx canon x others. thanks

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

We did one on the 1DX and some others! You can check it out here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pZyEuq-RhprKlJs.html

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

Let us know if this helps!

Just letting you know that in your description you put Sony A7r II its not an r. :)

Good comparison. I have made the switch to Sony and there are a lot more thing to consider when choosing between mirrorless and an old time camera with a mirror flopping around inside :). There are a lot of advantages to an EVF, but the dslr's still focus better in low light. I have an A7II for photography but I think that is because I have all sony lenses. And I mostly do video anyway. I would probably still have a dslr if I was doing a lot of photography. Probably the d750 though.

@TheSlantedLens

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching, Nate! Sonys really are fantastic cameras- keep shooting what you love!

How about the Nikon d750?

I'm looking at getting a camera to replace a failed 40D and I can buy a 2nd hand 5D MkIII for the equivalent of US$1K (I'm in NZ and they are around NZ$1.5K) with half a dozen examples showing right now on our equivalent of Ebay (Trademe). For the cost it looks like a really good FF camera. I want the camera for shooting sports, but would also use it for anything I want a 'good' camera for, everything else I own is using a tiny sensor. I can also pick up some nice glass 2nd hand, which helps keep the cost down.

just bought a 5Ds with battery grip for about the price of a 6D II. Sadly, no GPS or WiFi (unless I buy that card) or articulated screen. Or DPAF. I believe the 5D IV has GPS.

I think D750 would be easily the best choice for FF under 2k$ (and that's coming from Canon/Fuji shooter). Regarding these camera models up in the video, it's really hard to distinguish ISO differences with poor YT compression, but seems like 6D2 is a tiny bit ahead, but it's really close, so ISO shouldn't be main reason to decide about purchase. Regarding colors I see a little difference in skin tones hues between Canons with 5D3 being my favorite, 6D2 second and Sony after that, but I think Sony was constantly exposing better shots with more DR, while Canon (as always with any Canon DSLR camera) was burning highlights too easy. Regarding DR push at @11:00 mark, you can easily see in deep shadow details of her hair (her left shoulder) how much noise Canons have compared to Sony. One more thing I would like to see tested would be AF accuracy through viewfinder (with consistency of accuracy included) where I think Sony would come first (being mirrorless) and 5D3 would be second being known for reliable AF (if you account AFMA may needed for certain lenses ). Overall all 3 cameras has some advantages/disadvantages over other ones. 6D2 Pros: Dual Pixel AF, GPS, flip screen, lightweight, wifi+BT 6D2 Cons: Not really and improvement over (much cheaper) 6D1 in IQ and DR which makes it really expensive purchase, (still the same) soft 1080p video (from 5 years ago with even lower bitrate), no 4K, AF points in VF too narrow, no Spot AF point in VF, no dual slots for SD card, 1/4000 max shutter speed 5D3 Pros: Rugged and reliable DSLR with consistently accurate AF through VF, joystick for selecting AF points, dual card slots with fast CF card, optional Magic Lantern implementation, old (good) Canon colors look 5D3 Cons: old and expensive for 2017, no tilt/flip screen, heavy (but rugged), same soft 1080p video (but with Magic Lantern ability to shoot RAW should be considered, although it is really PITA for editing), low DR/ISO compared to Sony sensors in this price range. Sony A7II Pros: DR and more consistent and reliable exposure compared to other two cameras in this review, extended ISO 50 - 51200, eye AF works great through VF (good for portraits), single point AF very accurate, lightweight (but ergonomically not as fitting as Canon DSLRs), better 1080p with XAVC-S codec Sony A7II Cons: Sony color science is still lagging compared to Canon, Fuji, Olympus, Nikon (but easier to fix if shooting RAW), ergonomics not the best compared to other manufacturers (too much digging through menus), (good) Sony lenses are quite expensive and not smaller than Canon/Nikon counterparts with similar quality (but ability to use Canon lenses with AF over Metabones is certainly plus)

I got a used Nikon d810 for $1900 last year with 4k shutter

@Marrrrrrrcko

6 жыл бұрын

Kenric Martinez you can also get a Sony a7rii used for under 2000

@kenricmartinez4802

6 жыл бұрын

Lenses are cheaper for d810 (on average) but if you value portability I say definitely go for the ar7ii. As far as image quality, I feel as though the differences between the two cameras isn't big enough to pick a clear winner in that aspect. Bottom line both are fantastic cameras

@ahmadhusaini8420

6 жыл бұрын

it is all about lenses. these full frame line up is just sooooo good until lenses only makes them much difference

I’m halfway through this comparison and so far like the A72 . I’ll watch the rest

Not sure if it's my screen, but the Sony looks a tad green. Nothing that can't be dealt with in post, but just something I noticed :)

@jportrait1100

5 жыл бұрын

CyphDK greenish yellow. Their color sucks compared to canon

Getting the 6d mk2. I dont film but it is nice to have the option.

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

Great! Let us know what you think of it. Tag us in your photos @theslantedlens

What about the lens??

I had this doubt and well youre right. There's no clear conclusion unless you just really like one and want to stick to it. Sonys a bit cheaper but lenses may be more expensive. And the canons are a bit higher new but have good features too and cheap lenses. So... flaver of the day

Awesome video thanks 🙂 I am confused on which camera to buy, I am enthusiastic photographer, I have shot few times using Nikon d750 and canon 5d mark 3 Now to buy my 1st camera should I go to canon 80d or Sony Alpha 6400 Or a full frame canon 6D mark 2 or Nikon D750 I'm really confused .. with respect to buying one particular as the compatibility of lenses in future, Say if I wanna upgrade myself to mark 4 or Sony aR7iii Guys please help !! My priority is photography and less of video

Image stabilization?

2020 now and the a7II can be found for U$ 998 (with 28-70 lens, two batteries, 64 sandisk sd card, lens cleaning kit and a bag). Will it be a good choice for today' s standard?

@TheSlantedLens

3 жыл бұрын

It's a great camera that has great potential.

I came up with another problem concerning Canon equipping the 6D2 with outdated technology. I was setting up this camera for tethered shooting and was astounded that it has only the slow and antiquated USB 2.0 technology. Producing a camera in 2017 without at least USB 3.0 capability is simply inexcusable!

is the 6D2 LCD yellow and green? do lcd color look like 7d or 5D3 lcd? i know 5D4 LCD yellow and green, thanks

Thank you for the video. I was hoping to upgrade my 70D to full frame but the 6Dm2 wasn't quite what I was expecting so was also looking at Sony a7II and 5dm3, seeing that a 5Dm3 is close in price. I do video stuff too but seems that I would be better off carrying two cameras around now, one dedicated for video and one for stills. So with that in mind the 5Dm3 seems to still be a really great option, despite it's age.

@TheSlantedLens

6 жыл бұрын

I really do love the 5dm3- I use mine all the time!

@natekmusic2997

6 жыл бұрын

My 70d is still going strong but maybe end of 2018 will be a good time to try out some new cameras, considering the 7d mkiii is coming out and close to the $2000ish budget range.

@Immortal__

6 жыл бұрын

Stephen Gatley Better minute details? How does that happen when literally every ff lens pretty much halves in megapixels when used on apsc rather than ff

I hate the grains in my shadow on ISO 100 on the 6D2.

I believe the limited auto focusing points on the 6D 2 is a deal breaker . I'd like to see visually the limitations in a photo

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

We might have to delve a little deeper into the 6D2 for a future video, thanks for the suggestion!

very good

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

Did this help you decide which camera to get?

I keep wondering why everyone always seems to think that more focus points are automatically better than fewer. If you don't have efficient ways to move quickly from edge to edge, the vast amount of focus points can be a disadvantage (especially for wedding and event photography). I much prefer my 5DIII over my A7rii because it's more efficient. I just can't see why most circumstances would require more than 50 focus points. This is one of the areas where I think people just get caught up on the specs without considering their feasibility in action.

@TheSlantedLens

6 жыл бұрын

That's a good point, Otto! I think it's also important to remember that everyone is going to have different things they are looking for in a camera and will value different specs more or less than others.

@ottolindholm5047

6 жыл бұрын

Oh, for sure. But I was trying to make a point about the idea that you can't necessarily draw a linear correlation between the number of focus points and technical quality (specs) of the camera. If you can't efficiently move across your screen and still focus on accurate/small bits of your frame, I think you're skipping a factor. I think operability of the focus points is part of the specs too.

@Tzadeck

6 жыл бұрын

Having a full range of focus points is really really nice, though, if your camera can move between them quickly. I got really used to the OM-D series, where it's super easy to move between focus points and they cover the frame. So now when I'm using my Canon DSLRs I'm always frustrated. I'm not familiar with some of the newer Sonys, but I found their first mirrorless installments, including when they started doing full frame, annoying because you can't move between the focus points nearly as quickly as on the OM-D series, though. So I do know what you're talking about!

Guys can you do a deep to the bone, objective without mercy 6Dmkii review?

Why is GPS so cool? Flip screen... 🤔

I’ve had experience with all 3 of those cameras, and of the 3, the best one easily is the Nikon D750.

By the thumbnail I thought this was a star wars comparison on R2 units.

aaaaannnnddd the new Sony A73 blows them all out, not gonna ditch my 80D any time soon, but when I do I'll be taking a long look at the new Sony cameras for sure

@TheSlantedLens

6 жыл бұрын

Those Sony cameras are bringing the game to a whole new level.

Are you looking at the RAW files in Adobe Standard or the camera's Standard profile?

@TheSlantedLens

6 жыл бұрын

camera standard

Nice review, not all of us are buying brand new cameras....

There is only full frame. There is nothing else. Well ok I have an 80D as well. But growing up shooting 35mm film all my life. I find it hard to shoot anything less.

Lmao 4:25 "the Sony looks more yellow" 🤣 "you would expect"

@TheSlantedLens

2 жыл бұрын

Usually it is cooler. Thanks for watching!

thanks a looooot guys a needed this video

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

You're welcome Faisel, thanks for watching! Which camera are you leaning towards?

@faisalsalem2436

5 жыл бұрын

@@TheSlantedLens 6dii , its1200$ now and i think its really good value for money

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

Holiday deals are coming out, so it's a good time to buy as well!

@faisalsalem2436

5 жыл бұрын

@@TheSlantedLens yup thanks a lot bro

It is now 2018, and I got my first camera. I’ve upgraded from my iPhone X to a Sony A7II.

@TheSlantedLens

5 жыл бұрын

Woohoo! Let us know how you like it!

@Rafael-ly7hr

4 жыл бұрын

TYler_ SChecter how is it holding up so far?

guys - video - the 6D touch focus screen - one of the main things and you brushed over it - actually you didn't even mention that.

So you're saying it doesn't matter?

great!

I'm shocked to hear about the Sony battery life. I had a Sony HC-7 camcorder with a battery that lasted almost 10 hours.

You can use a power bank instead of all the batterys.

@sudeepadhananjaya6653

3 жыл бұрын

for 7 ii ?

On my screen. sony looks noisier (and darker) but seems to hold more detail in color. 5diii looks cleaner but with a magenta cast and the 6dii noisier than 5d and more magenta.

Rocking it with my 6d

@TheSlantedLens

4 жыл бұрын

Nice. Glad to hear it!

one very important thing is how strong is the body, how long before the first major repair... i had canons for years with no trouble, but my sony a7s started falling apart within a year... (never dropped, never mistreated, just crappy built...)

@TheSlantedLens

6 жыл бұрын

Good point, Silvio!

I'm using a Sony Alpha 7 ii with a Tamron 28-75 2.8, and i feel the autofocus is super slow in lowlight and the photos (without post production) are a bit flat. Does anyone know if the Canon Mark D ii in association with a Canon 24-70 2.8 would do a better job ?

@TheSlantedLens

4 жыл бұрын

Something to experiment with. Let us know how it goes.

On Sony a7 picture colour palette looks like placed with different angle...just have a look that gradient on black top and bottom corners and look at background camera placed not at same place 🤔 (sorry for my English) TEST IS FAIL

Multiple other good cameras are actually left out, PentaxK1 for 1800 new Nikon D750 Nikon D810 etc.. I know this was not a definitive comparison, but it still would be great if we can do that.. Also a more controlled light test would be better, and please recommend a starting lens too if possible..

@Janet_Airlines802

5 жыл бұрын

Anil Maurya most people can’t get their hands on 10 cameras to test, so they did the best they could with what they had is my guess.

@harshclimate

5 жыл бұрын

? Those cameras aren't in the description. Why on earth would they be in this review?

Where's the D750?

Actually with Sony cameras when I have to pop up the ISO I usually under expose and then I adjust the exposure in post, that way it will be the cleanest image compared to Canon and Nikon

her face expression in a7ii picture " what a small pocket, cheap and entry level camera is that"

I recently got a 2012 Canon 6D for 1375€ (you can easily find it at 1185€ now), and I find it pretty amazing. Previously I used a 100D, so yeah, but I'm not sure I would notice the difference in a 6D vs 5D m4 comparison. This video doesn't come close to the images like 100% so you can't spot the difference when it comes to noise, which makes this comparison pretty meh. To me, the 6D is just perfect at 6400 ISO for basically everything. If you need to go higher for something like a concert, 12800 is still pretty comfortable, 25600 being as far as you can go without compromising too much, more than that and you're better off with a faster glass (I use f4 lenses so...). But seriously, nowadays you can get good image quality pretty easily, it only takes a small part in the equation. Depending on your needs, lenses, video, autofocus (btw I'm ok with using only the cross type in the center and nothing else), controls and settings menu: those are, to me, far more important things when it comes to choosing a camera. You can surely have 12403 focus points, but if you can't change your exposure on the fly confidently, then you're just going to miss the shot. That's it.

Both Canons looked over exposed (highlights blown out) but performed better at high ISO.