Calculus 6.08g - An Intuitive Proof of l`Hopital`s Rule
An intuitive, graphical proof of l'Hopital's Rule, and some pertinent comments.
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 121
@Miguel_anitezАй бұрын
Learned about this rule in my Ap Calc AB class a few months ago. I asked the teacher where it came from and why it works and she said to just use it and she didn’t fully know. Thanks for teaching me! I find calculus very fascinating to learn and it’s people like you who make the world a better place. Consider becoming a teacher, you are very skilled!
@mousaalsaeed94106 жыл бұрын
most intuitive explaining I've ever seen 😲
@serhatcoban6797
4 жыл бұрын
Then, you dont know 3 blue 1 brown😁
@mousaalsaeed9410
4 жыл бұрын
@@serhatcoban6797 That's a long time ago
@serhatcoban6797
4 жыл бұрын
@@mousaalsaeed9410 😂
@greenhat7618
3 жыл бұрын
@@serhatcoban6797 maybe I’m dumb but I find this explanation on lhopital more intuitive than the 3b1b vid. Ofc his vids are great i loved his vid on taylor series.
@willpugh-calotte2199Ай бұрын
What a great explanation! Sometimes a graphical demonstration like this, although not a rigorous proof to the academic standard, is sufficient for the student to "see" why some rule works. I had a similar problem when shown Descartes' Rule of Signs, but with no proof offered. When I tried to find a proof of Descartes' Rule, the offerings were too advanced for me. Eventually, I reasoned out a graphical justification for Descartes' Rule myself, and that was sufficient to put me "at peace" with the rule and move on.
@alkankondo896 жыл бұрын
This was an excellent intuitive proof! It was carefully explained and easy to understand. So worth the time to watch! Also, your handwriting is very clean and neat!
@Snillocad143
3 жыл бұрын
I think that the word "intuitive" is an error of application. You are providing a proof explicitly which looks more to have come from first principles and which is an axiomatic reproduction of what l'Hopital would have used himself. Your explanation is clear but there is no circuitous other argument which would avoid obfuscation. For example, for me an intuitive argument would appear to explain l'Hopital's rule without the ideas what you have shown here and thereby move almost to claim credit for the result. Not only would that be a fanciful doubletalk, namely bullshit, but I can't think of how one could connect such disconnected ideas to what we know as an elegant and simple rule.
@pianowhiz236 жыл бұрын
I loved this! Certainly one of the better KZreadrs I’ve seen in terms of ability to explain and not leave holes for the student
@johnholme7834 жыл бұрын
Beautiful! Thanks for taking the time to produce this video, everything is now Chrystal clear!
@KarlBonner19825 жыл бұрын
I figured this proof out on my own - and I didn't even remember that it was actually L'Hopital's rule!
@derekowens
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent! You are thinking the same thoughts as some of the greatest mathematicians!
@IanPryor3 жыл бұрын
I really like how you graphed each function independently! That is super helpful and offers a new ways to use L'Hopital's Rule
@Ed-yk5yh Жыл бұрын
This was an unbelievably helpful and clearly explained video, thank you Derek!
@bp567896 жыл бұрын
You know when you know why something is the case, but you can't really explain it, and then someone does it for you so elegantly that your own understanding improves? That's this video. Thanks.
@gustavotaucei9 ай бұрын
Congratulations for the video. Great work!
@DavidPauwelynTravelingbyfoot3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic. I am sharing this with all my students from now on. Thanks.
@TheEpicGod1115 жыл бұрын
Fantastic graph and method of explanation. This should be put into all textbooks
@MrCigarro505 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic explanation. Thank you very, very, much.
@locutus78555 жыл бұрын
This was beautiful! Thank you. You just got a new subscriber buddy!
@APaleDot3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful. Exactly the kind of proof I was looking for.
@satishnatarajan7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the intuitive explanation
@jeanlemoignan31304 жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT explanation, thanks!
@hasandogan35108 ай бұрын
Bro you just got that done! Excellent!
@FriedmanArt4 ай бұрын
Just wonderful! Many thanks.
@gregorywong79924 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation yet so simple to understand!
@lwendt13 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation. Thank you!
@loopz_attack1658 Жыл бұрын
i am starting to understand what df/dx means in my calc 1 class. It really helps visualize what i am solving for instead of just plugging in numbers and getting the answer. I feel closer to math every time i see a good explanation of a concept.
@xxMpEGxx
Жыл бұрын
you are calculating an infinitesimal difference in height divided by an infinitesimal difference in width = slope same goes for Integrals: that big integral sign stands for Summation and the term f(x) inside is the height times the infinitesimally small width dx which results in the infinitesimal area, which is then summed up for each infinitesimally small dx over the interval
@quest4knowledge-xh3eu
4 ай бұрын
the good news is that dx and dy , df etc are NOT infinitesimals. But that's a new discovery. Seek and you shall find.
@thomasni1237 жыл бұрын
Wonderful proof dereck. you may want to use Desmos to do your graphing in the future though, it looks a lot neater than the emulated calculator :D
@tonksonk9513 жыл бұрын
Hey, I finally understand Lhopital's rule! This tutorial rocks
@fredrikrenstroem1661Ай бұрын
Starting this video: "how the hell does l'hospital actually work?" Exiting: "yeah, that makes sense." Thanks🎉
@howareyoudoing30125 жыл бұрын
Very smart explanation, thank you!
@Rogeriopris6 жыл бұрын
Of all the explainations that i saw,it was the best
@m0rtale1954 жыл бұрын
omg this is the only tutorial that showed why assumption of f(a) = 0 is a valid assumption, thank you!
@derekowens
4 жыл бұрын
You get it, man! The function has to equal zero at that point or it's not valid.
@DarkBidhan8 ай бұрын
Thanks you help me clear my doubts.
@hansgulbranson95064 жыл бұрын
Bless you Derek Owens
@triton626744 жыл бұрын
WOW great intuitive video!!!
@agrajyadav29512 жыл бұрын
Intuitive and awesome!!!
@minhokim82635 жыл бұрын
Wonderful, but could you please provide me with more explanation for the case of infinite/infinite? It sounds like limit f(x)/g(x) = limit (1/g(x))/(1/f(x))=d(1/g(x))/d(1/f(x)), which is not equal to df(x)/dg(x)
@amiyancandol4499
3 жыл бұрын
After that (g'/f')(f²/g²)=f/g , so 2possibilities, either f/g=0 or f'/g'=f/g so there's that
@Lod5314 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video!
@Rocky-me5cw5 жыл бұрын
That's the best L'H♡SPITAL video.Even KHAN ACADEMY CAN'T beat IT.
@KarenWasherGrudzien
3 жыл бұрын
Yes, except for the very unnecessary part where he refers to some sort of "curvature"in the earth that does not exist in our reality. The earth is flat, we aint no globe!!!
@AhmedMahmoud-tv9vw
3 жыл бұрын
@@KarenWasherGrudzien OK Karen
@KarenWasherGrudzien
3 жыл бұрын
OK Muhammad
@mathlegendno12
3 жыл бұрын
@@KarenWasherGrudzien Were you joking
@KarenWasherGrudzien
3 жыл бұрын
@@mathlegendno12 No
@sergiolucas382 жыл бұрын
Great video, hope you get more views :)
@alphamega3306 Жыл бұрын
Excellent video! 10/10
@hqs95852 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@michaelmurdoch5 ай бұрын
Awsome! Thanks so much!!
@minuklee67353 жыл бұрын
it's awesome. thank you.
@akshayv28494 жыл бұрын
Smart thinking. Never really looked at it this way :D
@siyabongankosi9956 Жыл бұрын
beautiful...plain beautiful
@darkdelphin8343 жыл бұрын
So technically earth is indeed flat if you zoom in by a lot
@derekowens
3 жыл бұрын
Exactly! If you ignore the terrain. The earth is curved, but locally it is flat. And if it's not flat enough for you, just move in closer and zoom in a little more.
@jamalsinger94454 жыл бұрын
Very very helpful 😍😍 thank you
@tranthaptinh3 жыл бұрын
ONE OF THE MOST FAVOUR MY THEOREM OF CALCULUS ................
@TheJunken23 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@michaelkraher82075 жыл бұрын
what an amazing video .. love it :) can you please tell me what software you use to create these videos? thanks
@kathieharine5982 Жыл бұрын
Excellent
@adnansakeeb7394 ай бұрын
this was so good....
@firstofallbasics18352 ай бұрын
Well explained
@tunasayl29283 ай бұрын
Thank you
@zachrox93 жыл бұрын
thank you kind sir
@pablote3254 жыл бұрын
You are amazing
@roaahedaya17797 жыл бұрын
amazing 👌😍😍
@zaidrehman215 жыл бұрын
good explanation
@allanhenriques26943 жыл бұрын
you could also explain it as: if you find the derivative of f and the derivative of g using the definition of the derivative, then you divide them, you will be left with f(a+h)/g(a+h) where 'a' is the value that x is approaching and h is approaching 0. So essentially you are dividing a point on f thats infinitely close to 'a', by a point on g thats infinitely close to 'a'
@miacapaldi8227 жыл бұрын
I'm someone who has dyscalculia and honestly it blows my mind when this makes sense to me more than simple Maths???
@loopingdope
7 жыл бұрын
What is dyscalculia? Similiar to dyslexia but with math and numbers?
@miacapaldi822
7 жыл бұрын
loopingdope yeah pretty much. reading numbers is difficult, as well as counting, remembering facts, misunderstanding place value and anxiety surrounding the subject itself. It's really difficult
@loopingdope
7 жыл бұрын
You can understand maths from videos like these ones? And this is a rather "hard" subject compared to regular math. It's kind of strange, but best of luck to you and I hope that you'll end up fine.
@jitendra_9973
5 жыл бұрын
I'm an UG B.tech 1st year student. I've already realized this proof during studying the Thomas's calculus book. And many other proofs like this also have I realized by myself. I think I am a different. What is the best thing I should do ? Because I am confused what I should do. Can you tell me what is best for me ? (Currently I am an electrical engineering UG student) All my classmates are blindly learning coding just to get good job in companies like Google. Please help me !!!
@johnhugon67
5 жыл бұрын
@@jitendra_9973 "All my classmates are blindly learning coding" Listening to what a random person on the internet tells you to isn't the way to figure out what to do for the rest of your life and is just as blind as what you criticize your classmates for. Understanding a proof like this doesn't make you special in any way either. Do what you enjoy, and if there's nothing you enjoy noticeably more than other subjects, pick something you would be able to tolerate for a long time and pays decently (nothing you couldnt imagine yourself doing for 20yrs or longer). You can search for your passion while you work at a well paying job, but make sure you don't attempt to make anything you dislike your career, you'll hate your life.
@fraserpye9667 Жыл бұрын
thanks
@AhmedAdel-ij5bb5 ай бұрын
بحسها بتحكي عني انا واختي واخويا بعيد عننا 😭😭 انا شاء الله سيجمع شملنا ❤
@sevarchy3 жыл бұрын
My understanding of this is that limx-->c f(x)/g(x), is "rise_f over rise_g". While the ratio of derivatives is " (rise_f/run)/(rise_g/run) = rise_f over rise_g".
@bakdiabderrahmane80094 жыл бұрын
3blue1brown style of intuitive demonstration
@dadinggo4 жыл бұрын
cool
@emanuelradu41042 жыл бұрын
What if x -> infinity ? How would this type of graphical proof look like ? I ask this because I've tried every which way and i find it impossible ( my case is a 0/0 case as x -> ∞ where f(x)=1/(4x^2 -5x) and g(x)=1/(1-3x^2) ). Thank you for the video!
@DoofEvil
8 ай бұрын
be explains it in the end, where he shows how ♾️/♾️ = 0/0
@kanerashiki10465 жыл бұрын
@Derek Owens What I've learned from this video: zero/zero = infinity/infinity Just kidding amazing video which gave me a lot of insight Now you've just made me interested in the relationship I mentioned above I don't feel like the mathematical community is very comfortable with it
@kanerashiki1046
5 жыл бұрын
Nor that I can learn much about it from existing resources
@cpotisch
4 жыл бұрын
They’re both indeterminate forms, but they can’t really be equated.
@tranthaptinh3 жыл бұрын
PROBLEM WE DON'T HAVE TIME TO DERIVE FORMULA WHEN YOU DO THE EXAMS ........... THE EXAM QUESTION ONLY GIVE YOU ENOUGH TIME TO SOLVE EACH PROBLEM ............... LIMIT TIME FOR EACH QUESTION ................ IF YOU ARE LATE FOR ONE QUESTION THEN THE NEXT QUESTION YOU HAVE TO DO FASTER ...........................................................
@khalidelgazzar4 жыл бұрын
Hmmmm .. interesting
@grjesus99793 жыл бұрын
So basically you`re deriving a function respect to other?
@GSHAPIROY3 жыл бұрын
13:15 Not the case, because the derivative of 1/g(x) is not 1/g'(x).
@Kokurorokuko2 жыл бұрын
I wonder why L'hopital's rule doesn't work in an arbitrary point where y! = 0. The graphs would be the same but shifted, so it seems to me that the rule should be also applicable. Why is that false?
@catharsis7629
2 жыл бұрын
Remember these graphs are not straight, the slope would be different in that reference frame.
@APaleDot
Жыл бұрын
Remember, we are taking the limit as x -> c, which means we can approximate the functions as if they are linear functions f(c) + f'(c)dx and g(c) + g'(c)dx as shown in the video. It works out so nicely in the video because f(c) = g(c) = 0, which means the ratio between these two approximations becomes (0 + f'(c)dx) / (0 + g'(c)dx) = f'(c)dx / g'(c)dx = f'(c) / g'(c). But consider the case where f(c) = g(c) ≠ 0. Then our limit turns out very differently because as x -> c, dx -> 0 and the ratio of the approximations becomes (f(c) + 0) / (g(c) + 0) = f(c) / g(c)
@tranthaptinh3 жыл бұрын
ONE OF MY FRIEND SAID TO ME ...... IF YOU FORGET FORMULA YOU HAVE TO LEARN HOW TO DERIVE THE FORMULA HOW TO PROVE THEOREM IN A QUICK WAY ...........
@derekowens
3 жыл бұрын
Yes! And this one makes so much sense if you understand that little diagram of the two functions and their slopes.
@paulg4443 жыл бұрын
its might be easier just to use a Taylor series about x=c and L'Hospital falls off the page.
@bhujiamonster34715 жыл бұрын
u should use desmos
@tranthaptinh3 жыл бұрын
THE PROBLEM ME AND MY FRIEND MAKE AN ARGUMENTS WHICH WAY LEARN QUICKER ...... EVERYTIME GO TO EXAMS ....... I LOST AT LEAST 5 MINUTES TO WRITE DOWN ALL THE MAIN IMPORTANT FORMULA BECAUSE SOMETIMES I FORGET FORGET FORMULA WHEN THE QUESTION IS TOO EASY TO SOLVE ..... REALLY ANNOY ...............
@rekhakalsekar85174 жыл бұрын
Flat earth society disagrees
@J.B242 жыл бұрын
Use Desmos!
@davidseed29394 жыл бұрын
Very instructive but please use the correct word. A demonstration or explanation but not a proof.
@derekowens
4 жыл бұрын
Okay, I see your point, and thanks. I do think, though, that the approach shown here is logically compelling, and in that sense it would qualify as a proof.
@carsonholloway5 жыл бұрын
Um no ur actually wrong the earth is indeed flat.
@derekowens
5 жыл бұрын
Ah, that's good to know. Thanks for clearing that up for everyone. I'll tell my friend who is a pilot and I'm sure that will help him navigate over the north pole, if there even is such a thing. Oh, the silly delusions we would all believe if it weren't for the enlightenment provided here. I'm glad you've shared your wisdom for all of us to partake of.
@carsonholloway
5 жыл бұрын
@@derekowens I know, it sounds ridiculous at first, but believe me, I used to be as unaware as yourself. But one day, (a rainy Tuesday, to be specific), I had a realization that the government's notion of a spherical earth, and the moon landing, at that, are all dogmatic statements forced upon all the innocent, yet ignorant, members of society. Consider this for yourself; is it really worth the government to spend ~$21.5 billion /year on NASA, for them to make rockets and satellites, or for the supreme leaders of the world (including, but not limited to the members of the Illuminati) to have a spare ~$21 billion /year to continue and expand their operations (the other .5 billion /year is NASA's budget to fake the spherical earth "evidence"). Now, the first counterargument you may give is gravity forces the earth to collapse into itself and form a sphere. While it is true that gravity does exist, and it does keep the world from falling into pieces, (and this is the part where many of the "spherical" earth simpletons seem to get it wrong), a sphere is not the only way for a mass to be in equilibrium. If you have attended physics in modern day university, you will of course be taught that the earth is a sphere as the gravity pulls all the mass into some sort of stable structure, which is only sometimes a sphere; there are many other three dimensional shapes that can be in equilibrium, such as tori or discs. But, as you would have been aware if you weren't a believer of the false information fed to you by the authorities, the earth is obviously a disc. You may be familiar with Ockham's Razor, (originally "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem", or commonly translated to "The simplest explanation is usually the best" or more literally "More things should not be used than are necessary"), and indeed, in this instance the simplest explanation is that the earth is a disc. The earth looks flat to you as you walk around, you don't notice the curvature, which leads to the much simpler explanation of the earth actually being flat. But instead the government said the earth was spherical, with little to no evidence, and everybody else believed them. I'm genuinely sorry for you, that you're living under a metaphorical rock, unbeknownst to the truth.
@carsonholloway
5 жыл бұрын
@@davidbandy6268 I'm not a flat-earther, I was just trying to give the most ridiculous sounding argument I could think of.
@davidbandy6268
5 жыл бұрын
@@carsonholloway I guess I was wrong, it's really sad how much of the world is existing totally oblivious to the lies of our government... And then people like you come along, get so close to the truth, and then just make fun of it because you are too weak to admit that you have been deceived. Unbelievable.
@carsonholloway
5 жыл бұрын
@@davidbandy6268 Give me your best argument for why the earth is flat and maybe you can change my mind.
@vanessamichaels9512 Жыл бұрын
the way you say "over" is so bizarre. Are you like an oldschool so-cal surfer?
@derekowens
Жыл бұрын
Haha! That's pretty funny. I grew up on the east coast, and while I didn't do much surfing I did watch Fast Times at Ridgemont High...
@KarenWasherGrudzien3 жыл бұрын
2:40 The world is flat!! Get it right n do ur own research we aint no globe! 🙄
@derekowens
3 жыл бұрын
The earth is flat ...if you zoom in enough!
@jitendra_99735 жыл бұрын
I'm an UG B.tech 1st year student. I've already realized this proof during studying the Thomas's calculus book. And many other proofs like this also I have realized by myself. I think I am a different student. What is the best thing I should do? Because I am confused about my career. Can you tell me what is best for me ? (Currently I am an electrical engineering UG student)
@REL1C
5 жыл бұрын
Getting off KZread and finding a passion would be a good start.
Пікірлер: 121
Learned about this rule in my Ap Calc AB class a few months ago. I asked the teacher where it came from and why it works and she said to just use it and she didn’t fully know. Thanks for teaching me! I find calculus very fascinating to learn and it’s people like you who make the world a better place. Consider becoming a teacher, you are very skilled!
most intuitive explaining I've ever seen 😲
@serhatcoban6797
4 жыл бұрын
Then, you dont know 3 blue 1 brown😁
@mousaalsaeed9410
4 жыл бұрын
@@serhatcoban6797 That's a long time ago
@serhatcoban6797
4 жыл бұрын
@@mousaalsaeed9410 😂
@greenhat7618
3 жыл бұрын
@@serhatcoban6797 maybe I’m dumb but I find this explanation on lhopital more intuitive than the 3b1b vid. Ofc his vids are great i loved his vid on taylor series.
What a great explanation! Sometimes a graphical demonstration like this, although not a rigorous proof to the academic standard, is sufficient for the student to "see" why some rule works. I had a similar problem when shown Descartes' Rule of Signs, but with no proof offered. When I tried to find a proof of Descartes' Rule, the offerings were too advanced for me. Eventually, I reasoned out a graphical justification for Descartes' Rule myself, and that was sufficient to put me "at peace" with the rule and move on.
This was an excellent intuitive proof! It was carefully explained and easy to understand. So worth the time to watch! Also, your handwriting is very clean and neat!
@Snillocad143
3 жыл бұрын
I think that the word "intuitive" is an error of application. You are providing a proof explicitly which looks more to have come from first principles and which is an axiomatic reproduction of what l'Hopital would have used himself. Your explanation is clear but there is no circuitous other argument which would avoid obfuscation. For example, for me an intuitive argument would appear to explain l'Hopital's rule without the ideas what you have shown here and thereby move almost to claim credit for the result. Not only would that be a fanciful doubletalk, namely bullshit, but I can't think of how one could connect such disconnected ideas to what we know as an elegant and simple rule.
I loved this! Certainly one of the better KZreadrs I’ve seen in terms of ability to explain and not leave holes for the student
Beautiful! Thanks for taking the time to produce this video, everything is now Chrystal clear!
I figured this proof out on my own - and I didn't even remember that it was actually L'Hopital's rule!
@derekowens
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent! You are thinking the same thoughts as some of the greatest mathematicians!
I really like how you graphed each function independently! That is super helpful and offers a new ways to use L'Hopital's Rule
This was an unbelievably helpful and clearly explained video, thank you Derek!
You know when you know why something is the case, but you can't really explain it, and then someone does it for you so elegantly that your own understanding improves? That's this video. Thanks.
Congratulations for the video. Great work!
Fantastic. I am sharing this with all my students from now on. Thanks.
Fantastic graph and method of explanation. This should be put into all textbooks
What a fantastic explanation. Thank you very, very, much.
This was beautiful! Thank you. You just got a new subscriber buddy!
Beautiful. Exactly the kind of proof I was looking for.
Thanks for the intuitive explanation
EXCELLENT explanation, thanks!
Bro you just got that done! Excellent!
Just wonderful! Many thanks.
Excellent explanation yet so simple to understand!
Excellent explanation. Thank you!
i am starting to understand what df/dx means in my calc 1 class. It really helps visualize what i am solving for instead of just plugging in numbers and getting the answer. I feel closer to math every time i see a good explanation of a concept.
@xxMpEGxx
Жыл бұрын
you are calculating an infinitesimal difference in height divided by an infinitesimal difference in width = slope same goes for Integrals: that big integral sign stands for Summation and the term f(x) inside is the height times the infinitesimally small width dx which results in the infinitesimal area, which is then summed up for each infinitesimally small dx over the interval
@quest4knowledge-xh3eu
4 ай бұрын
the good news is that dx and dy , df etc are NOT infinitesimals. But that's a new discovery. Seek and you shall find.
Wonderful proof dereck. you may want to use Desmos to do your graphing in the future though, it looks a lot neater than the emulated calculator :D
Hey, I finally understand Lhopital's rule! This tutorial rocks
Starting this video: "how the hell does l'hospital actually work?" Exiting: "yeah, that makes sense." Thanks🎉
Very smart explanation, thank you!
Of all the explainations that i saw,it was the best
omg this is the only tutorial that showed why assumption of f(a) = 0 is a valid assumption, thank you!
@derekowens
4 жыл бұрын
You get it, man! The function has to equal zero at that point or it's not valid.
Thanks you help me clear my doubts.
Bless you Derek Owens
WOW great intuitive video!!!
Intuitive and awesome!!!
Wonderful, but could you please provide me with more explanation for the case of infinite/infinite? It sounds like limit f(x)/g(x) = limit (1/g(x))/(1/f(x))=d(1/g(x))/d(1/f(x)), which is not equal to df(x)/dg(x)
@amiyancandol4499
3 жыл бұрын
After that (g'/f')(f²/g²)=f/g , so 2possibilities, either f/g=0 or f'/g'=f/g so there's that
Brilliant video!
That's the best L'H♡SPITAL video.Even KHAN ACADEMY CAN'T beat IT.
@KarenWasherGrudzien
3 жыл бұрын
Yes, except for the very unnecessary part where he refers to some sort of "curvature"in the earth that does not exist in our reality. The earth is flat, we aint no globe!!!
@AhmedMahmoud-tv9vw
3 жыл бұрын
@@KarenWasherGrudzien OK Karen
@KarenWasherGrudzien
3 жыл бұрын
OK Muhammad
@mathlegendno12
3 жыл бұрын
@@KarenWasherGrudzien Were you joking
@KarenWasherGrudzien
3 жыл бұрын
@@mathlegendno12 No
Great video, hope you get more views :)
Excellent video! 10/10
Great video!
Awsome! Thanks so much!!
it's awesome. thank you.
Smart thinking. Never really looked at it this way :D
beautiful...plain beautiful
So technically earth is indeed flat if you zoom in by a lot
@derekowens
3 жыл бұрын
Exactly! If you ignore the terrain. The earth is curved, but locally it is flat. And if it's not flat enough for you, just move in closer and zoom in a little more.
Very very helpful 😍😍 thank you
ONE OF THE MOST FAVOUR MY THEOREM OF CALCULUS ................
Amazing!
what an amazing video .. love it :) can you please tell me what software you use to create these videos? thanks
Excellent
this was so good....
Well explained
Thank you
thank you kind sir
You are amazing
amazing 👌😍😍
good explanation
you could also explain it as: if you find the derivative of f and the derivative of g using the definition of the derivative, then you divide them, you will be left with f(a+h)/g(a+h) where 'a' is the value that x is approaching and h is approaching 0. So essentially you are dividing a point on f thats infinitely close to 'a', by a point on g thats infinitely close to 'a'
I'm someone who has dyscalculia and honestly it blows my mind when this makes sense to me more than simple Maths???
@loopingdope
7 жыл бұрын
What is dyscalculia? Similiar to dyslexia but with math and numbers?
@miacapaldi822
7 жыл бұрын
loopingdope yeah pretty much. reading numbers is difficult, as well as counting, remembering facts, misunderstanding place value and anxiety surrounding the subject itself. It's really difficult
@loopingdope
7 жыл бұрын
You can understand maths from videos like these ones? And this is a rather "hard" subject compared to regular math. It's kind of strange, but best of luck to you and I hope that you'll end up fine.
@jitendra_9973
5 жыл бұрын
I'm an UG B.tech 1st year student. I've already realized this proof during studying the Thomas's calculus book. And many other proofs like this also have I realized by myself. I think I am a different. What is the best thing I should do ? Because I am confused what I should do. Can you tell me what is best for me ? (Currently I am an electrical engineering UG student) All my classmates are blindly learning coding just to get good job in companies like Google. Please help me !!!
@johnhugon67
5 жыл бұрын
@@jitendra_9973 "All my classmates are blindly learning coding" Listening to what a random person on the internet tells you to isn't the way to figure out what to do for the rest of your life and is just as blind as what you criticize your classmates for. Understanding a proof like this doesn't make you special in any way either. Do what you enjoy, and if there's nothing you enjoy noticeably more than other subjects, pick something you would be able to tolerate for a long time and pays decently (nothing you couldnt imagine yourself doing for 20yrs or longer). You can search for your passion while you work at a well paying job, but make sure you don't attempt to make anything you dislike your career, you'll hate your life.
thanks
بحسها بتحكي عني انا واختي واخويا بعيد عننا 😭😭 انا شاء الله سيجمع شملنا ❤
My understanding of this is that limx-->c f(x)/g(x), is "rise_f over rise_g". While the ratio of derivatives is " (rise_f/run)/(rise_g/run) = rise_f over rise_g".
3blue1brown style of intuitive demonstration
cool
What if x -> infinity ? How would this type of graphical proof look like ? I ask this because I've tried every which way and i find it impossible ( my case is a 0/0 case as x -> ∞ where f(x)=1/(4x^2 -5x) and g(x)=1/(1-3x^2) ). Thank you for the video!
@DoofEvil
8 ай бұрын
be explains it in the end, where he shows how ♾️/♾️ = 0/0
@Derek Owens What I've learned from this video: zero/zero = infinity/infinity Just kidding amazing video which gave me a lot of insight Now you've just made me interested in the relationship I mentioned above I don't feel like the mathematical community is very comfortable with it
@kanerashiki1046
5 жыл бұрын
Nor that I can learn much about it from existing resources
@cpotisch
4 жыл бұрын
They’re both indeterminate forms, but they can’t really be equated.
PROBLEM WE DON'T HAVE TIME TO DERIVE FORMULA WHEN YOU DO THE EXAMS ........... THE EXAM QUESTION ONLY GIVE YOU ENOUGH TIME TO SOLVE EACH PROBLEM ............... LIMIT TIME FOR EACH QUESTION ................ IF YOU ARE LATE FOR ONE QUESTION THEN THE NEXT QUESTION YOU HAVE TO DO FASTER ...........................................................
Hmmmm .. interesting
So basically you`re deriving a function respect to other?
13:15 Not the case, because the derivative of 1/g(x) is not 1/g'(x).
I wonder why L'hopital's rule doesn't work in an arbitrary point where y! = 0. The graphs would be the same but shifted, so it seems to me that the rule should be also applicable. Why is that false?
@catharsis7629
2 жыл бұрын
Remember these graphs are not straight, the slope would be different in that reference frame.
@APaleDot
Жыл бұрын
Remember, we are taking the limit as x -> c, which means we can approximate the functions as if they are linear functions f(c) + f'(c)dx and g(c) + g'(c)dx as shown in the video. It works out so nicely in the video because f(c) = g(c) = 0, which means the ratio between these two approximations becomes (0 + f'(c)dx) / (0 + g'(c)dx) = f'(c)dx / g'(c)dx = f'(c) / g'(c). But consider the case where f(c) = g(c) ≠ 0. Then our limit turns out very differently because as x -> c, dx -> 0 and the ratio of the approximations becomes (f(c) + 0) / (g(c) + 0) = f(c) / g(c)
ONE OF MY FRIEND SAID TO ME ...... IF YOU FORGET FORMULA YOU HAVE TO LEARN HOW TO DERIVE THE FORMULA HOW TO PROVE THEOREM IN A QUICK WAY ...........
@derekowens
3 жыл бұрын
Yes! And this one makes so much sense if you understand that little diagram of the two functions and their slopes.
its might be easier just to use a Taylor series about x=c and L'Hospital falls off the page.
u should use desmos
THE PROBLEM ME AND MY FRIEND MAKE AN ARGUMENTS WHICH WAY LEARN QUICKER ...... EVERYTIME GO TO EXAMS ....... I LOST AT LEAST 5 MINUTES TO WRITE DOWN ALL THE MAIN IMPORTANT FORMULA BECAUSE SOMETIMES I FORGET FORGET FORMULA WHEN THE QUESTION IS TOO EASY TO SOLVE ..... REALLY ANNOY ...............
Flat earth society disagrees
Use Desmos!
Very instructive but please use the correct word. A demonstration or explanation but not a proof.
@derekowens
4 жыл бұрын
Okay, I see your point, and thanks. I do think, though, that the approach shown here is logically compelling, and in that sense it would qualify as a proof.
Um no ur actually wrong the earth is indeed flat.
@derekowens
5 жыл бұрын
Ah, that's good to know. Thanks for clearing that up for everyone. I'll tell my friend who is a pilot and I'm sure that will help him navigate over the north pole, if there even is such a thing. Oh, the silly delusions we would all believe if it weren't for the enlightenment provided here. I'm glad you've shared your wisdom for all of us to partake of.
@carsonholloway
5 жыл бұрын
@@derekowens I know, it sounds ridiculous at first, but believe me, I used to be as unaware as yourself. But one day, (a rainy Tuesday, to be specific), I had a realization that the government's notion of a spherical earth, and the moon landing, at that, are all dogmatic statements forced upon all the innocent, yet ignorant, members of society. Consider this for yourself; is it really worth the government to spend ~$21.5 billion /year on NASA, for them to make rockets and satellites, or for the supreme leaders of the world (including, but not limited to the members of the Illuminati) to have a spare ~$21 billion /year to continue and expand their operations (the other .5 billion /year is NASA's budget to fake the spherical earth "evidence"). Now, the first counterargument you may give is gravity forces the earth to collapse into itself and form a sphere. While it is true that gravity does exist, and it does keep the world from falling into pieces, (and this is the part where many of the "spherical" earth simpletons seem to get it wrong), a sphere is not the only way for a mass to be in equilibrium. If you have attended physics in modern day university, you will of course be taught that the earth is a sphere as the gravity pulls all the mass into some sort of stable structure, which is only sometimes a sphere; there are many other three dimensional shapes that can be in equilibrium, such as tori or discs. But, as you would have been aware if you weren't a believer of the false information fed to you by the authorities, the earth is obviously a disc. You may be familiar with Ockham's Razor, (originally "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem", or commonly translated to "The simplest explanation is usually the best" or more literally "More things should not be used than are necessary"), and indeed, in this instance the simplest explanation is that the earth is a disc. The earth looks flat to you as you walk around, you don't notice the curvature, which leads to the much simpler explanation of the earth actually being flat. But instead the government said the earth was spherical, with little to no evidence, and everybody else believed them. I'm genuinely sorry for you, that you're living under a metaphorical rock, unbeknownst to the truth.
@carsonholloway
5 жыл бұрын
@@davidbandy6268 I'm not a flat-earther, I was just trying to give the most ridiculous sounding argument I could think of.
@davidbandy6268
5 жыл бұрын
@@carsonholloway I guess I was wrong, it's really sad how much of the world is existing totally oblivious to the lies of our government... And then people like you come along, get so close to the truth, and then just make fun of it because you are too weak to admit that you have been deceived. Unbelievable.
@carsonholloway
5 жыл бұрын
@@davidbandy6268 Give me your best argument for why the earth is flat and maybe you can change my mind.
the way you say "over" is so bizarre. Are you like an oldschool so-cal surfer?
@derekowens
Жыл бұрын
Haha! That's pretty funny. I grew up on the east coast, and while I didn't do much surfing I did watch Fast Times at Ridgemont High...
2:40 The world is flat!! Get it right n do ur own research we aint no globe! 🙄
@derekowens
3 жыл бұрын
The earth is flat ...if you zoom in enough!
I'm an UG B.tech 1st year student. I've already realized this proof during studying the Thomas's calculus book. And many other proofs like this also I have realized by myself. I think I am a different student. What is the best thing I should do? Because I am confused about my career. Can you tell me what is best for me ? (Currently I am an electrical engineering UG student)
@REL1C
5 жыл бұрын
Getting off KZread and finding a passion would be a good start.
Thank you