I have waited 13.75 billion years to see this video.

@omarchavez804

5 ай бұрын

YOU, my friend, are the big bang!

@meddylad

5 ай бұрын

Just think..... if space, matter and time was able to be created within trillions of a second, whats to say it cant all collapse or change within a trillionth of a second. Life really is that short

@silveriver9

5 ай бұрын

Nobody told you time is an illusion?

@meddylad

5 ай бұрын

@@silveriver9 ask me again in 10 minutes

@brucemarcus7272

5 ай бұрын

@@silveriver9An illusion? The past, present, and future exist simultaneously, according to Einstein. And, time slows with motion and gravity.

Finding new videos with Brian Cox's name on them is joy...

@aegisgfx

5 ай бұрын

This isn't new, I've heard him say that bit about inflation in about 20 other videos

@lestersabados1306

5 ай бұрын

Brian Cox was a mediocre player for the 01patriots.

@maflones

4 ай бұрын

Brian Cox's name was clickbait.

@rxw5520

4 ай бұрын

They swiped the bit of Brian cox audio from another video. If I’m not mistaken it was a video of him answering questions from Australian school children. Really good video. A lot better than this one. And original. The rest of this is Brian Greene.

@xStarblazer

4 ай бұрын

Nah, I hate those ridiculous scammy AI bot videos that’s like THEYRE ALREADY HERE or thumbnails with Brian Cox looking sad like WE ARE SCARED or some clickbait shit, and it’s just stock or stolen footage with some AI voice and clips taken from other places

I’m a simple woman.. I see Brian Cox, I click.

@dreamthread

5 ай бұрын

Holly Finkle clicks on Cox

@goldentwilight1944

5 ай бұрын

you love him.

@jesterps2236

5 ай бұрын

what the hell is wrong with you both she just made a simple comment

@holly.fickle1607

5 ай бұрын

@@jesterps2236 thank you, I was thinking the same thing myself.

@goldentwilight1944

5 ай бұрын

@@jesterps2236 to the rescue!

Absolutly the best,content to listen to when I need to fall asleep.

Our brains are not sculpted to understand what this universe is.

@hello_world_0

4 ай бұрын

Tell that to humans 200 years ago

@ghostraider4312

4 ай бұрын

Even today it’s just out of our scope. The more answers, more questions arise.

@reidsimonson

4 ай бұрын

But we are of the universe created within it because of it. So our brains are more than sculpted by it, in fact they are a culmination of it.

@anthonyltllkyser5272

4 ай бұрын

We are designed to think start and end but maybe this whole thing is for eternity. No beginning no end we are just a pebble on the beach.

@secretamericayoutubechanne2961

3 ай бұрын

I came to the same conclusion trippin on LSD back in the 9os😅🎉❤

Very impressed with this video. I have always been interested in astronomy and physics. It was things like this that drove me to enter those professions. Thank you for feeding my insatiable curiosity about the universe and the wonders that we discove

@maflones

4 ай бұрын

Nah, it's misleading and clickbait. Brian Cox is hardly in this video and he doesn't answer the question posed in the title. None can.

@nuntana2

3 ай бұрын

The bit with Cox is at least a couple years old as he still talks about 350B galaxies, where the revised-up number is now 2-4 trillion.

thank you for an articulate, thoughtful and deliberate presentation of a very difficult topic

This was very well written, and executed. Thank you.

@miquelr2353

4 ай бұрын

Sure ignore the blatant clickbait

@itslong8

2 ай бұрын

most fantasy talk seems to be that way

Cryan Box is a cool dude and always a good listen.

I love all the discussion and hypothesis! I learn something reading all these everytime.

Nice video. Thank you for sharing.

One of the amazing things to me is that we’re not some sort of separate thing from the universe. We’re not an outside thing observing the universe around us. We are part of it all. So, especially the universe ponders itself. We ponder the universe and we are a little section of it. The universe is something that thinks about itself. I know that I’m not the first to think of it that way, but I never really hear anybody talk about it. Except by the woo people. But the woo people are correct, about that little part. The rest is, uh, woo.

As Brian pointed out, if time started with our universe, then it makes no sense to ask what happened before that occurrence, and if it doesn’t make sense to ask what happened before that occurrence, it also doesn’t make any sense to ask how it occurred. That’s because the “how” question always implies a temporal element and apparently there was no time before the big bang.

@EvicFiniteGen13

5 ай бұрын

God

@Cheese276Crackers

5 ай бұрын

​@EvicFiniteGen13 doesn't exist, but it's nice you have an imaginary friend

@Cybersawz

5 ай бұрын

IMO, nothing happened before the so-called, "Big Bang." The fabric of space and time came into existence from a black hole, and we're living within it.

@philthefluter1

5 ай бұрын

There has been many expansions

@iankelly8666

5 ай бұрын

That’s hilarious so we are not allowed to go beyond our understanding. Ok Einstein don’t ask any questions because we now have to stop thinking. Time is just a veneer. It can be manipulated so it’s like a cover. You can peer around it’s sides, through it and beneath it. What ever created it, or what came before, exist outside of time, and therefore is not governed by it. Now is not the time to stop thinking

Had a meal of baked beans & fosters beer some time ago ; that was my big bang ... Thought provoking video & thanks for that .

@user-jw9lq5ib6g

2 ай бұрын

hopefully... a planned and prepared .. ooeeh... exit.. beginning of something new.. 🤣🤣

I love your content. Could you share where you find those amazing scenes?

There was no start and no ending. This been going on for eternity it keeps repeating! We just evolved this time around.

@Matko722

2 ай бұрын

Is this just your opinion or whats your source? 🙄

@ballisticbomb

29 күн бұрын

I just love assuming things based on what I think is right and ignoring the facts laid out in front of me

There was nothing forever, and when theres nothing forever, something happens spontaneously in a blip, before it goes back to nothing forever. Basically, forever infinite...anything can happen and will.

What created the infinitesimal point that held all the matter in the universe? 🤯

@woodydroneson

5 ай бұрын

Maybe blackholes over many billions of years

@manoo422

5 ай бұрын

Most likely a big crunch...

@chrissmith6675

5 ай бұрын

And, where is that point?

@manoo422

5 ай бұрын

@@chrissmith6675 The center of the universe.

@sivi9741

5 ай бұрын

That infinitesimal point you speak of was just a big huge star that collapse (big bang) creating a black hole . We are in one . In other words our “big bang “ was a white hole . And space , like in a black hole expand faster then the speed of light (light can’t escape a black hole) . The event horizon is exactly the same of a black hole and our beginning of our universe , we can’t go beyond (CMB) . Etc etc . The numbers of similarities is high

My Model For The First Events in the Beginning of the Universe. (From left to right) 1. Singularity before the Big Bang was eternal photons. 2. Big Bang was a release of photon energy. 3. Photons through pair conversion, created space time; and both the fundamental particles and first atoms of hydrogen and helium. 4. The universe temperature continued to drop until the annihilation phase when all free electrons (e-) and positrons (e+) not in atoms, began to annihilate and turn into pure energy. 5. This massive universe wide conversion of mass to energy caused the inflation phase. This model suggests my answers to these physics questions. Q. What was the singularity that started the Big Bang? A. Eternal photons outside of space and time. Q. Where did the anti matter go? A. It went into the protons and neutrons. Protons have 2 positrons and one electron. Neutrons have 1 proton and one electron. Q. Why did inflation happen? A. When the temperature fell low enough, free electrons and positrons annihilated in a universal wide explosion of energy that created the inflation period.

Excellent lecture.

Well when you pull two quarks apart it creates two more. If accelerated expansion keeps going in our universe there may be a point where it expands fast enough to pull quarks apart. Then the expansion energy starts to pour into matter creation. Then gravity adds up and slows expansion down. Bang a bunch of matter and an extreme expansion rate.

@leonreynolds77

5 ай бұрын

I have thought that very thought. That will be how a universe will restart from a big rip.

@winkipinky

5 ай бұрын

Or perhaps God just farted and our universe is made up of the remaining fart matter. The repulsive gravity was literally repulsive.

@samtheweebo

5 ай бұрын

@@winkipinky wonder if we could expect a log to be following soon then...

@katehamilton7240

3 ай бұрын

Thanks! I did not know about the creation of two more quarks after a pair is pulled apart.

I am no physicist by any stretch of the imagination, but I love watching this stuff. For all the physicists out there, I have a question. Prior to the Big Bang, were there any "laws of physics"? Were the processes driving the creation of matter controlled by a "physics" that was extant prior to the Big Bang? Are the laws of physics a product of the "matter" formed during the Big Bang (or simultaneously)? If there were no laws of physics prior to the Big Bang, what would this mean? Could the Big Bang have happened spontaneously from nothing as there were no "laws" that made this impossible? My brain goes into melt down just thinking about this stuff!

@petyrkowalski9887

5 ай бұрын

I am a physicist and so far as we can work out, the laws of physics as we know them came into being at the moment of the singularity. There were clearly physics involved but the rules as such are unknown.

@MrPeterprinciple

5 ай бұрын

As a physicist, can you please explain what possible physics explain cosmic inflation where all matter, energy and the expansion of space was faster than the speed of light. As I recall, in the early 80's the Cosmic Inflation Theory was proposed to fix problems with the Big Bang theory that cosmologists saw in the observable universe. It seems Einstein's Theory of Reality where nothing can travel faster than the speed of light was definitely not part of the physics immediately after the Big Bang. Cosmic inflation lasted for a trillionth of a second. Thanks.

@richardrejmer8721

5 ай бұрын

@@MrPeterprincipleNothing with mass can travel THROUGH space faster than the speed of light. That's true. . BUT the 'big bang' was SPACE itself expanding and carrying the matter outwards with it. . . Imagine a ball of dough with raisins in it. . Raisns on the surface and within the dough cannot travel from place to place faster than the limit (let's call that limit 'the speed of light') BUT if the ball of dough expands as it's being cooked, all those raisins are moving away from one another in the dough. . . Each individual raisin is not moving *_through_* the dough, but is being carried along BY the dough as it expands (faster than the speed of light). Another analogy I've seen used is dots on the surface of a partly inflated balloon. Inflate the balloon quickly. . . All the dots rapidly move away from one another. NONE of the dots are moving across the surface of the balloon. . They remain fixed on the rubber exactly where they were, and yet without moving 'through space' (across the surface of the balloon) they are all moving away from one another at an impossible speed. the dots are moving outwards WITH space and not THROUGH space. Does that help explain?

@jesterlead

5 ай бұрын

I think a key point often overlooked is this video is only talking about 5% of the total matter and energy in the universe. Hardly worth a video, perhaps, once the smart folks figure out how dark energy / matter interact in all this which are by far the "drivers" of our universe. We just can't see it...

@TheSCPStudio

5 ай бұрын

No physicist can answer this. There are speculations but we barely understand the laws of physics as they are. Gravity being a perfect example. So we have virtually no way of actually knowing what physics were like at the Big Bang.

I did! Wow, that's a load off my mind. I feel so much better now!

What if it didn’t have everything in it but it was kinda like how 5 is in the middle but can be used to go down or up through the infinite numbers inside. So 5 could exist but it doesn’t have to be everything in one place at once.

With new discoverys, is it possible that there wasn't a big bang but a collision of two dimensions (one over full and one empty. Leaving one rapidly bleeding into the other? Giving the look of as if it was an explosion?

@dolaopposite

Ай бұрын

You guess is as good as anyone's because the scientists don't know either.

Awareness is known by awareness alone; is the sole irreducible axiom of reality. To put forth a syllable to the contrary is but to concede.

From the time of big bang, the universe and life has gone through a large series of random "accidents" that are producing marvelous designs ... amazing! I wish I can see at least one of such accidents in my life.

@livingweaponnightmare

2 ай бұрын

"Accidents"? Or God?

@FJB2020LGB

2 ай бұрын

Almost like those accidents are by design, oh wait they are. Thanks God for putting this is motion so we can have a chance to live

@ARKSURVIVOR879

7 күн бұрын

Do Christians seriously come on here just to judge us?

I love space 💜

I bet the big bang was nearly as loud as dropping the toilet seat in the middle of the night

The answer manifests itself in everything that happens. The universe forces everything to evolve in a spiral shape until the most outward parts are so spread they are forced back to the center that eventually will have stronger force/gravity. When the center is so tight it has no option but to evolve again, the process happens again, and again.

Don't worry. Be happy.😊

In another universe you wrote this comment

@hawksgoated3613

2 ай бұрын

no…the same nebula from two different times

Interesting that the James Webb telescope is now challenging all of this and is exposing how much guess work is going into it !!

@davidchapman3218

5 ай бұрын

They aren't happy about it, but history repeats its self. Alot of advancements missed because of peoples egos.

@keithnicholas

5 ай бұрын

no... it isn't. What it is doing is challenging our assumptions of the young universe.

@Feignlander

4 ай бұрын

lol no it’s not. How tf does this comment have 20 thumbs up.

@nuntana2

3 ай бұрын

It gets thumbs up from confirmation-bias numpties who don't really know what they're looking at and think of physicists as guessing and unknowing. The JWST observations have not challenged 'all of this' at all. All it suggests is that early galaxies might have formed more rapidly than we thought. Some people then naturally think we have it all wrong, there was no big bang, Einstein and Newton are wrong etc etc ad nauseam. Drivel. More likely that the early universe was super-dense and hot (we know that) with intense dark matter action allowing first-gen galaxies to accrete stars extremely rapidly.

Prof Brian Cox is the most clever and most beautiful man.,.

Where did the energy come from to produce the expansion?

Never mind the big bang, how did the singularity - every thing , get there in the first place? Are there any more of these hanging about?

@maflones

4 ай бұрын

Imagine that, the title was pure clickbait.

@dwinexboy77

4 ай бұрын

Penrose has an hypothesis for this in that, the big bang is the result of the collapse of a previous universe

@viktorstorelv

4 ай бұрын

​@@dwinexboy77I like this idea!

@LuckyFlesh

4 ай бұрын

​@dwinexboy77 but how did that universe come to be?

@theprinceof2004

4 ай бұрын

you will go in infinit regress , so the answer is god

But what about the new information regarding the potentially new galaxy discoveries made by the james-Webb telescope? Stating there are fully developed galaxies where there shouldn’t be? Or if he believe this may be something else? I’d love to know Brian cox’s take on this?

How does the 'eventuation' of space fit into current understanding / discussion?

Before and after big bang is heaven with the smarter people

NO. Einstein believed that the Universe is infinite (and therefore also infinitely old). That must mean he didn't believe in BigBang either. I certainly don't either.

@dougthompson1598

5 ай бұрын

Neither a finite universe or an infinite one make any sense to the human brain or mind. Ultimately it matters not what any of us believe, it will be revealed through mathematics to be one or the other, regardless of our feelings or beliefs.

@SF-UK-888

4 ай бұрын

Well, that’s that sorted!

@khosta6690

4 ай бұрын

I don’t think saying the universe is infinite means it didn’t start somewhere buddy

@LuckyFlesh

4 ай бұрын

​@@khosta6690If it's infinite, then it couldn't have a beginning. You can't traverse infinity, meaning, you couldn't go from the beginning to where the universe is now, because that's infinite...you could literally never get from the beginning to now.

The beauty about Science is, it's not afraid to say - we don't know (yet).

Thank you! Love this video! We all have to come to our own conclusions. I've been trying for years to figure out what mine is. I just can't figure out my own conclusion (and probably never will) what started everything, everywhere. In my mind, there has to be a beginning. Even if I believe the multi-verse theory, and our universe is a new bubble from other multi-verse bubbles, how did they start? It's mind boggling to even think about. I also am starting to think this has something to do with interaction and crossover between dimensions but that's pretty edgy stuff, even for me. Then there's the simulation theory which really makes me crazy so I can't even go there; thanks to whoever put that in my head, ugh! It all just makes me wish I went into this field, it is so very fascinating! I'm a huge fan of Brian......oh well, back to work.

I don't buy much about cosmology theories about the Big Bang. For example, the idea that the singularity was an infinitesimally small point presumes the existence of space in order for "infinitesimally small" to make sense, but what if space didn't even exist yet? Or time. Why even use the word "explosion"? Clearly it was not one.

@manoo422

5 ай бұрын

Who in the video used the word explosion...?

@TedToal_TedToal

5 ай бұрын

@@manoo422 it was used.

@manoo422

5 ай бұрын

@@TedToal_TedToal Not to describe the Big Bang, idiot.

@captainbryce1

2 ай бұрын

@@TedToal_TedToalThe narrator said "suddenly expanding in an explosive burst of creation". This is poorly worded (and misguided language) as it gives the wrong impression that there was an explosion. But cosmologists do not define the Big Bang as an explosion at all, only a rapid expansion of space and time. This video is not the best presentation for layman because it uses a lot of confusing language and even contradicts itself a few times. It conflates "theories" with "hypotheses" (which are two different things), it defines cosmic inflation as before the Big Bang, and then later says it came after the Big Bang. And it asserts that the "singularity" model is the primary model used by Big Bang cosmologists today, which is false. It does get a lot of things right, but the presentation is very poor, misleading, at times contradictory, and ultimately confusing. You are correct to be skeptical of the singularity theory because it has largely been debunked by the cosmological community. But your reasons for being skeptical of it makes no sense. If we assume that the universe did in fact originate as a singularity, then an "infinitesimally small point" would have no space because it is "infinitely" small. It would only represent a point of energy absent of all dimension (including space and time). So there would be no "space" in a singularity. Think of it as a negative dimension, existing nowhere in space, like the center of a black hole. The real problem with the singularity theory is that it doesn't allow for as many predictions as cosmic inflation prior to the Big Bang, which means it's superseded as the inferior theory. Under the cosmic inflation model, you never get to a singularity.

@enriquea.fonolla4495

2 ай бұрын

We have all grown up hearing that. But we now know it was always a bad choice of words. I beleive it arises because there was a sudden incredibly huge energy burst, acoompanied by an equally huge expanisonof spacetime.

My theory is that there was a universe before ours. Like our universe it had black holes, which keep growing and growing, eating everything in its path. Until a time one black hole gets so big that it swallowed everything else in the universe. With that black hole having nothing else to feed it it eventually exploded in a "big bang" and a new universe began.

@tanzilmuslehudd9403

5 ай бұрын

hmm do you think that onces we die we could come back at some point with a diffrent life then the one we have today ?

@stefanpolihronopoulos723

5 ай бұрын

I like the way you think. I've always thought something similar.

@patrickdodge916

5 ай бұрын

I think our universe formed much like a drop of water from a leaky faucet. Maybe a universe outside of ours, like you described, allowed for "larger" states of matter to exist. A massive amount of matter was possibly compressed by one of these black holes until a critical point was reached, which caused a white hole to burst into our universe, causing the inflation of our universe. Beyond that, I imagine dark matter might be what our universe is expanding into, and instead of rebounding our universe might just continue to disperse. My imagination is vast, lol. I think black holes are punctures in the fabric of our universe due to matter being too "heavy" for our universe to contain.

@Sam-lq2jh

5 ай бұрын

@@tanzilmuslehudd9403 I don't know about that, I suppose maybe but if so our memory of a previous life gets erased at death.

@seanhewitt603

5 ай бұрын

Two of three responses want to be included in the next universe... you wanna tell them, or should/could I?

Its just so insane our brains can not comprehend the absolute beginning of literal anything and everything. Its weird to try to think about on the "why?" And "but what about what caused that to cause that to cause that?" The smaller and further back you go

I just listened to a theory that gravity is caused by the warping of time. If the big bang was caused by negative gravity would this be the warping of negative time? I.e. the end of one univers's deflation causes the inflation of the next universe with the warping of negative time?

At one time, the entire universe occupied less space than a single atom. The universe was created by an invisible man in the sky. I don't know which story is more unbelievable.

@hawksgoated3613

2 ай бұрын

the latter because it allows for multiple different laws of reality based on a higher or lower dimensional playing field

@user-bw7se2zg7b

2 ай бұрын

Theology and cosmology are mutually exclusive; cosmology explains the how, the mechanics only. But it should be obvious that the universe was created by God - who is not a "man in the sky" but beyond our comprehension. God's mind is beyond our capacity to understand.

Who else has a fear of falling up to towards the sky? Gravity reversal... Scary 😳

@petyrkowalski9887

5 ай бұрын

Not me.

@mr.e7022

5 ай бұрын

I fear the the sudden loss of hydrogen oxygen bonding energy.

@winkipinky

5 ай бұрын

Seek help, that's not normal 😅

In what way this repulsive gravity could be related with dark energy? I'm assuming they are unrelated as I've never heard this gravity concept being mentioned on dark energy discussions.

@katehamilton7240

3 ай бұрын

I wondered that too, dark matter/energy and repulsive gravity must be linked closely, right?

To me, BigBang is like a Hearbeat, it was not the first nor the last, we had bigbangs before and we will have bigbangs in future

@petyrkowalski9887

5 ай бұрын

I have often thought that… and there could be many in many dimensions

@dougaltolan3017

5 ай бұрын

You'll be thinking of "big bounce" cosmology. Then there is the idea that our universe isn't the only one, there's a "sea" of universes all bubbling away. Then there is the idea that we don't bounce, we just expand to oblivion, but the sea of expanded universes is prone to clumping into new big bangs.

@Mlab923

4 ай бұрын

You have not any proof. İt is just your imagination.

One Big Bang doesn’t make any sense.

@redriver6541

Ай бұрын

Multiples do? Both seem absurd to me. This all had to have a beginning.....whether it's one or an infinite number.

@lx4118

Ай бұрын

@@redriver6541 what’s wrong with “we don’t know” ?

We are biologically incapable of comprehending the concept of "before the big bang", assuming it's not a meaningless concept entirely.

Something to consider is that running the clock backwards shows everything in the universe moving in the direction of convergence in a singularity, but it could be that all matter was confined to an unimaginable mass with finite and measurable dimensions, like an impossibly massive and bright and hot star but nevertheless with measurable properties. Think of it like if your house is on Main Street at the center of town (the singularity). Well, just because you show up at the grocery store at the edge of town (the modern era) one morning doesn't mean you left your house, maybe you had a sleepover at your friend's house who lives closer to the edge of town than you do. Just because you can point from the grocery store to the center of town doesn't mean all cars that arrive at the grocery store started at the center of town. Now, I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just saying it's a possibility that is overlooked, and we can be asking the question what caused this mass of matter with some measurable size to exist. Maybe it's a rant of an older universe which collapsed. Maybe quantum field converged at the point and caused each other to generate particles in unfathomable quantities. Overall the big bang is a fascinating field to study.

The difference between scientists and creationists is we ask 'Why?', 'How?' and 'Where's the proof?' And we admit we are wrong when proven so. We don't start with answers and twist evidence to fit them, inserting magic in the gaps.

@jorgenoriega9152

5 ай бұрын

Where were the proof???science fiction...now we know the universe probably has no beginning...dark matter and dark energy ( ghost 👻) created by science to fix they theory ( some of them has no evidence)they are so arrogant and still taking about the 13.5 billion years (LIES)they don't know yet if our universe has a beginning 😊

“Everything we see now was compressed smaller than an atom” this is where they lost me, if we can believe that, we can believe anything that doesn’t make any sense

@manoo422

5 ай бұрын

Just because its beyond you, isnt relevant.

@lx4118

5 ай бұрын

@@manoo422 you didn’t get my point, if you can believe everything can be compressed to less than an atom without any evidence, is not science, it is in the religion territory

How was the temperature of the singularity infinitely high? Singularity means when all matter is packed so densely that no particle is even able to move even so slightly. And temperature is the quantity which refers to how fast particles are moving in a thermodynamic system. So singularity should be at absolute zero temperature (-273.15 K). Please discuss 🙏🏻

@hari4406

2 ай бұрын

With very high pressures, very minute vibration can translate to very high temperature. If back pressure is removed particle vibration would be big. Absolute zero is not like that. Eg: apply a high pressure with hand and rub it. Contrast that with low pressure rub. High pressure rub needs only a small rub to generate heat. Although work done will be same if time taken is constant to achieve a particular level of temperature.

Whatever it is we are, we are entities which perceive whatever the universe is in a time based continuum. Perhaps time is a function of consciousness, a way of consciousness gaining some kind of perspective of itself, like the visual images in our minds are constructs of the brain

I love silly cartoons. 😌 Heck, science doesn’t even know what time is.

Listening to this, makes me support Sir Penrose's CCC even more

@dougthompson1598

5 ай бұрын

CCC still makes me feel profoundly uneasy. All hypotheses regarding the beginning of the universe, or lack of a true beginning, do as well. We're just not equipped to deal with infinity.

@enriquea.fonolla4495

2 ай бұрын

infinity is a bitch@@dougthompson1598

Another concept is that energy density as measured by the impedance of space is what governs what appears to be gravity. This new idea, The Z0 Code, allows for an open universe with no need for a singularity or big bang. This proposes that the development of the universe is ongoing. It explains what the the JWST sees and incorporates the observations of LIGO.

Only when mankind understands exactly what time is we won't get anywhere with science

I agree with the concept ask How not Why makes a lot more sense than the religious creation myth

How about this: the energy density "constant" wasn't a constant but a decreasing value. There came a point when this value dropped below a point where the energy condensed into matter!

I think the answer is right in the title.😮

Two universes scrapping together gave rise to a fresh explosion

Well, the big bang, and 9 months later, a star is born.

I' m just wondering if there was a singularity...where that singularity was placed exactly? Does anybody have an idea about this? Thanks

@harrywatleyjr6301

4 ай бұрын

It was everywhere.

@nuntana2

3 ай бұрын

Yes, everywhere. Greene or Cox would have mentioned it somewhere in this vid. There is no one point in the universe you can point to and say that is where the BB emanated from, since it was the creation and source of everything we now see, so, yes, everywhere and we were inside it. Detune your TV and some of the static you'll see is the Big Bang afterglow, the CMBR.

The Reason Why a lot could connect with each other. Because if inflation is correct. Perhaps I need to learn tell a lot scientist don’t think that inflation is right. But what started it all-I wonder if we are able to answer that question. I think quantum physics just needs time before it can create an universe

I can understand their explanation of the big bang. I've always wondered where the single atom he mentioned came from? What was before and where did it come from?

@michael-4k4000

5 ай бұрын

It didn't come from anywhere. It was always there wise guy.....

@patryk2535

5 ай бұрын

@@michael-4k4000 "It was always there" is a religious statement (philosophical at best), and has nothing to do with science or understanding the universe.

@danielbrewer6469

5 ай бұрын

Look into the Higgs field and boson particles. Also check out "Is nothing something?" I'm not going to pretend I have a mastery of this knowledge, so I'll let you research this on your own. What I can't wrap my head around now is that before the Higgs Field could exist, a *place* had to exist first that would allow the physics of a Higgs Field to exist. (Presumably) A lot had to happen before the singularity. (Also, Presumably) This is where you could venture into an "eternal chaotic inflation". But that would still require a place for this to exist. This is where I am personally. Maybe a real physicist can chime in and tell me how f'd up I am. Lol! Haha

@iankelly8666

4 ай бұрын

@@patryk2535 True scientist

@LuckyFlesh

4 ай бұрын

​@@michael-4k4000You have no idea if that's true or not.

Pretty sure it's just the wave function of the universe, like normal. As we collect more data about the relative motion of galactic clusters relative to each other as perceived from our local perspective, developing a best fit model to generate a wave function should be pretty straightforward. No idea why people in general seem to not get this.

My understanding is if I travelled to an area of super-high gravity (like a black hole), and came back to earth, thousands of years would have passed - effectively moving me forward in time. So, if an area of repulsive gravity existed, would that move me backward in time? Are time and gravity linked?

Two thoughts...... First ...If time and space were created at the moment of the big bang, then events preceding it are unavailable for observation and are therefore irrelevant. Two...If, at the moment of the big bang, the universe was a singularity with infinite density, the gravitational forces would have been so immense that it would have been impossible for it to explode.

Of course, we should all understand that this is just theory.

One explanation is that we caused the 'Big Bang' by having the thought that we could separate from our Source/Oneness/God. The material world/the universe is then an illusion or the dream that we and everything else are separate. This is based on 'A Course in Miracles.'✨✨😊😊✨✨

I am sure you are mistaken.How can we be expanding and yet colliding with Andromeda?

So dark energy as an anti gravity is everywhere regular matter/anti matter isn't pushing it both together in clusters and apart as a whole because whenever you have a net charge of some type then there is repulsion kinda thing?

13.75 billion years seems a very short time period when theres all eternity to go at. 2 branes collided? What made the branes?

At t=0, Admin typed RUN, and the memory was formatted and parameters input. The program did not immediately crash; Admin saw this was good and decided to let the program run.

Hello - Each Big Bang occurs of its own accord without prompting or ignition of any sort. Best wishes.

Random events.. in all the chaos they might looks like random events when we perceive with our human brains and eyes.. but in the end we know its an cycle that goes and lives thru. Thus making universe/multiverse infinite.

One of my favorite topics, as the singularity that held all the existing energy of the known universe, expanded to what it is right now, it blows my mind thinking of the unreal numbers of how dense and hot it was, as energy is converted, the amount we have now is the same as back then, so physics just dont exist at that time. Makes you think about the consept of time and space, maybe our understanding of time began with the big bang. Who knows what could have caused it. If we involve multiverse theory and our big bang is the result of a colision, then what created the other universes, what created the first universe. Maybe we had a big bang of the multiverse, but then, what created that? Honestely this just melts my brain and I love this feeling!

@valtrai439

4 ай бұрын

I think we see the universe from our own glass. And in consequence we think some laws are principles apply to everything when most likely they don't. Just like on the past we learned that Newton laws were only applicable in certain cases, I think the same happens with causality principle. Maybe we think everything has a cause because of what we're exposed to but maybe in the origin there wasn't a cause and effect law.

The idea of Big Bang itself is ridiculous. We may never know how the universe started, if it ever started.

i'm a simple man......i see Brian Cox and i start yawning.....then i fall asleep 🥱🥱

How can there be nothing. I cant see it, we are educated with a beginning and an end. But how about no beginning and no end

the repulsive gravity is caused by the vibrational shockwaves ie zero point energy created from explosive activity from stars...these shockwaves compress around solid objects and because photons use these waves to travel light will bend around those objects...areas where there are more stars these waves are compressed and push outward...and i believe the length from crest to crest either slows time or speeds it up

James Webb telescope findings had contradicted that no such thing as Bing bang and subsequent inflation had never occurred. But Here you’re explaining Bing bang 🤔

I had baked beans last night!

Is it possible that Inflation was able to happen with the speed that it did because at that point space was actually being created and without the prior existence of space there would have been no constraints of time?

@winkipinky

5 ай бұрын

See I think inflation theory is all wrong because without time, space or an observer, size meant nothing. Think about it, a circle is still a circle no matter what size it is, and it gets bigger, or smaller the bigger or smaller you, the observer are. Scale is meaningless without perception of time and space.

7:09 so if it might have been something smaller than an atom.... where was that thing that might have been smaller than an atom? Where did it reside or come to be? The more one thinks about all this, the more it drives you nuts.

I find it difficult to accept that the infinite universe or the infinite void could be infinite, but we have no other choice because if it was finite then we have to ask what is beyond the finite void which leaves us in an other expanse of infinite. The only other option is to accept that the void/universe exists and does not exist. The void beyond the universe is the most difficult to come to terms with :( Maybe the physical universe does not exist and there is nothing other than time starting and stopping, and time creates the illusion of a physical universe.

@RealityBoat

4 ай бұрын

yeah exactly you either have an infinite void or a finite border with an infinitely thick wall, both are infinite. Which logically you can think of it more like the opposite of infinite, the void is the absense of stuff so its not really infinite since what it is is nothing, its not a thing to be measured

@iankelly8666

4 ай бұрын

There’s nothing wrong with asking what was before. That’s science. Don’t sit in your comfort zone.

@axle.student

4 ай бұрын

@@RealityBoat Thank you, I like the way you have put it; "the void is the absense of stuff so its not really infinite since what it is is nothing, its not a thing to be measured" Like the number Zero, it does not exist or is the absense of any measurable stuff, but we conceptional the idea that in some sense makes zero exist as an abstract idea rather than something tangible. Time not being a tangible/material thing like zero does not have to exist in any physical realm to begin with. And for what ever reason time begins its expansion and the tension between it's beginning at zero and current place of progression leaves this illusion of empty 3D space (note material objects/energy still have to emerge out of that stretching of time somehow. it may be possible that energy emerges from the stretching of time.). What do you think? I know it is mostly philosophical thinking and although I am not an indentured physicist I have studied physics for most of my life even if I struggle a little at the extremes with some of the math knowledge. Is this a plausible pathway of thinking? I have arrived at this similar point from looking at it all from alternative perspectives. > Also, I am thinking maybe to stay in line with what I have said above the dimension of time should maybe be moved to dimension Zero instead of 4 as we now state it. If time does not exist materially and 3D space emerges from time (Zero), and if 3d space inherently emerges from time and is linked to time then time should be the Zeroth dimension to me. Time = D0 X = D1 Y = D2 Z = D3 :)

@axle.student

4 ай бұрын

@@RealityBoat Sorry Phone call lol I was attempting to capture parts of this idea visually in my Time Dilation clock. Using the circular clock face diagram allows me to visualize multiple points of zero and infinity in the same dynamic representation. It's only a first attempt and I need to bring additional physics into it to get a better representation :) But for now I can get the full spread of time dilation out to the speed of light, from 'c' to 'Zero' where time is stopped. The interesting part is the representation feels inverted with the event horizon at the outer most circumference, which is somewhat opposite to how black holes a typically represented. I am looking forward to progressing that in the new year when I have more time (pardon the pun lol).

@axle.student

4 ай бұрын

@@iankelly8666 Well, this is the point. After asking the question "what was before?" I repeatedly come to the conclusion that there was nothing, and still is nothing, and I feel that there doesn't actually have to be anything before. Or to put it another way, I feel that the universe does not exist in any medium to begin with as it can exist out of the absolute lack of anything. But I still have to ask if the non material concept of time itself is eternal, or if time began spontaneously. Does time need an event to make it begin? Possibly not. The very nature of time may be self initiating.

The hows and whys of the Universe and it's existence is probably a mystery that we'll probably never know despite of all of the cute little equations that try and fail to do so. But one thing is clear even though they won't admit it. Repulsive gravity = explosion. Inflation = explosion. Unimaginable forces, temperatures and expansion from an unimaginably small and dense object = explosion.

It's good question to think about, but I think we could have infinite time and still never know the answer. There maybe one way to find the answer and that would be from the A.I singularity, again if it is actually possible to create.

The answer is a very simple one - we do not know, and we will never know, we can only speculate.

YOU!

Sir Roger Penrose has some interesting things to say about all this. In short, an empty universe that is devoid of matter, forgets how big it is and the remaining photons from the previous universe all of a sudden looks like a singularity, which is the the precursor to the next big bang. He calls it conformal cyclic cosmology. Worth googling.

Tom's Theorem: When a black hole ingests everything in it's path, including light, that light and matter isn't "eliminated" from the universe, nor is it a portal to another universe. Black holes create dark matter through this combined "devouring" of light and matter, and spew it out of their centers, fueling the expansion of the universe. A black hole is never "dormant", it doesn't "burp out" energy when it's full, and it's working way harder to produce and emit dark matter than it does to shoot gamma rays. When it does emit gamma rays, it's actually a drop in activity from "dark matter production", at the same time giving us something we can see and analyze in the form of light beams.

Thanks "Science Time" for your very interesting video and topic! I don't want to play the know-it-all here, but after the latest discoveries of the JWST it is clear that our universe was not created with a big bang starting from a singularity. It´s impossible for mature galaxies and stars to exist that are significantly older than the assumed big bang theory back to almost 14 billion years ago! Something must have happened differently with the beginning of space and time. The renewal theory of the universe mentioned earlier in the video or the multiverse theory with the transition zones have now become much more logical and probable. It seems that we have to adapt our ideas about the beginning to new circumstances. So our universe is not 14 billion years old, it is probably eternal and constantly renewing itself, so there is no real beginning and end, it is an eternal cycle of existence... ​

@daveking1540

5 ай бұрын

I have trouble with the concept of 'eternal' in that it feels to me - like a failure of our understanding. We don't understand something, so we just say 'oh, it's eternal'. A bit like our lack of understanding of black holes, we just say 'there's a singularity'. Well, we don't actually know exactly what it is, so we just use 'singularity' as a descriptor. To me, the talk of things being 'eternal' feels like 'elephants all the way down' theory from centuries ago.

It’s crazy how one human being cannot perceive all the information in the entire world, but that information spread out across every human being is the only way it can exist

Very interesting video. We seem to rely on the concept of inflation but we must remember there is no evidence for it, it is just an assumption we have made to fit our observations

I find really fascinating how defenders of each theory, the strings theory, the simulation theory or the multiverse, no matter which one, will sometimes call people of faith stupid when their theory can not be proven and depend also only on faith. For the simulation one, it's even worse since their whole way of thinking depend of a creator...