I’m honestly really glad that this video included Lady Jane Grey, since I think people forget that she was a Queen, albeit it only for what 9 days? I’m also glad that clips from the Hollow Crown were included in this as well

@janefelix3821

3 жыл бұрын

She was never recognized by Parliament or the Privy Council. The law that Edward VI signed shortly before his death was the brainchild of his Regent, who really ruled the country, Lord Northlumberland (John Guilford), who by the way was Jane's father-in-law. One has to surmise that he named Jane successor conditional on her marrying his son Dudley, thus making his son King.

The Queens of England are the most interesting in history.

@Codie-el2di

6 жыл бұрын

EvanSol919 Perhaps but few of them could compare to Isabella of castile.

@VCYT

6 жыл бұрын

NO ones heard of her.

@abbe1029

6 жыл бұрын

VC YT then you need to get out of youtube and read more

@QDomar

5 жыл бұрын

Love the English Queens!!! Regards from Poland.

@rosanaconta3416

5 жыл бұрын

Catarine the great

I love how England is remembered with the queens on their own right

The Queen's are more interesting than their husbands!😁😶

Beautiful homage to women and their importance in politics and the destiny of the lands of the world

Mary of Scots was never queen of England

fantastic upload. thankyou so much and thank you for putting the Queens in chronological order in the clip and the description. I for one appreciated it a lot.

Hun this was epic and beautifully put together! I love the way it is going in order too. :) Wonderful job! XX

@Kait931

9 жыл бұрын

thanks so much!! I am very glad you like it!!!Of course there is no comparison with your own great videos!!!They are just adorable!!!

@MadamCameron

9 жыл бұрын

Kait931 Hey sorry for late reply! You are welcome, you deserve it, more people should vid all of these amazing people in one vid! Oh thank you very much hun!

It was better had the title been ' Queens of England and Scotland '

Thank you for putting them in chronological order.

I like Spanish royalty the most.

I was watching all these featured videos and started liking them all. Only to discover that they are done by the same person :) Wow! I'm in love with your work Kait931 !!!

@patriciagamboagutierrezhkj7156

6 жыл бұрын

GoldM90 ...

You get the wrong Mary, and you also should put a little bit more of Elisabeth of York, at the end we can say she was the mother of a dinasty (The Tudors)

@janefelix3821

3 жыл бұрын

And the Stuart and Hanover too, even leading to today's Windsor. James I of England was her great great-grandson and George I of England and Hanover was James I's great-grandson. Since George I every monarch was either a child or grandchild of a prior monarch. The only reason they are not Hanover is that Victoria's children took their father's family name and then during WW1 due to it being a German name it was changed to Windsor.

I loved it!

Great video!!!

Mary, Queen of Scots, wasn’t a Queen of England tho... *EDIT: If she were still alive, she would have been Queen-Mother but nothing more (As her son was King).*

@morriganjones4656

5 жыл бұрын

Nymph Lux she would have been queen after Elizabeth if she had our lived her

@idontgiveafaboutyou

5 жыл бұрын

Madison Jay if she didn’t have James, she would become queen

@morriganjones4656

5 жыл бұрын

Gabriella 69 even if she hadn’t had James she still would have been queen after Elizabeth because she was the nearest direct descendant of Henry VII through his oldest daughter Margaret(Mary was Margaret oldest living grandchild that was legitimate)

@MsRealitytvfan

5 жыл бұрын

Doesn't matter people, she was never ACTUALLY queen of England. What ifs dont count

@scottibrown3274

4 жыл бұрын

There is the argument that her claim to the English throne was stronger than Elizabeth’s, so maybe that’s why she was included?

All that went thro my mind was: divorced beheaded died divorced beheaded survived and tonight we are LIVEEEEEE

I like Margaret of Anjou and Katherine of Aragon the most. Both their husbands were weak, yet their strength shined through. Katherine Parr is another great one of course with Elizabeth Tudor.

Great video! But wtf is Mary of Scots doing in here? A claim yes but never crowned. If you recognise her as queen then you should not have included Elizabeth 1, whose part was so short

@izzieandavadanuggets9325

9 жыл бұрын

sailormoonserenity99 For some reason they always use somewhat unattractive actresses to play Elizabeth I. Mary, Queen of Scots was much attractive but the reality was that Queen Elizabeth I was pretty in her youth. She had a pretty face and fine nose. Her mouth was not wide. I suppse they are always looking for natural red heads so they ignore the features but Queen Elizabeth I was much better looking than that actress.

@melodyclark1944

8 жыл бұрын

+sailormoonserenity99 Both claimants can be included. It is history. The video also included Lady Jane Grey.

@olhasum4721

6 жыл бұрын

Kristin Harris I see your point. Though Cate Blanchett playing Elizabeth was gorgeous

@idontgiveafaboutyou

5 жыл бұрын

Kristin Harris I thought Cate Blanchett was pretty attractive for Elizabeth and looked like her.

Omg it was amazing were all movies or shows?

just for a sec, I thought you wouldn't have included Elizabeth I :P silly me! hey, what movies/tv shows you used footage from?

In this video there is Mary queen of Scots because she was queen of England for those who didn't recognize Elizabeth as queen but not just between nobles also for poors

the hell is Mary Stuart in there...she was the Queen of Scotland not England. She put a claim in but nothing happened other then her losing her head.

@tsevca

7 жыл бұрын

That´s relative. Elizabeth was without a doubt the Queen of England in practice, but whether she was usurper or she had a lawfull claim, that´s something for discussion certainly. On the other hand, Mary Stuart´s claim was nothing to question, that was a sure thing. From one point of view, she was Elizabeth´s heir, but from the other, she became English Queen by the death of Mary Tudor. The fact that she wasn´t crowned or that she didn´t actually get to rule it is another thing. She wouldn´t be the first and neither the last.

@bexie1992

7 жыл бұрын

tsevca Unless you are crowned, you cannot call yourself the monarch. People may do so, but they cannot legally be called so.

@tsevca

7 жыл бұрын

bexie1992 That´s complete nonsense. Edward VIII was never crowned either. And he was the King of GB. The last Czech king, who went through the coronation, was Leopold II and there were many kings after him, not to mention all the "never-crowned" kings before him, who were never crowned. If what you said was true, there would nations, who were hundreds of years without ruler.

@bexie1992

7 жыл бұрын

You mean England. Great Briton and England are two different things.England is one country where as Great Briton is four countries together. And the law is the law, if they are not crowned they are not legally the monarch. Just because they act like it doesn't make them the King/Queen. Jane Seymour for example was called Queen but was never crowned and this weakened Edwards claim to the throne when compared to his sisters whose mothers were both crowned.

@tsevca

7 жыл бұрын

bexie1992 I know the difference and I did mean Great Britain, but you obviously need to refresh the history of the 20th century. But please, tell the Habsburks that they weren´t legal rulers of most of their realm for hundreds of years. If what you say, was true, the period of a king´s rule would be counted from the day of his coronation, which never is. You´re right, the fact the his mother never got to be crowned weakened Edward´s claim, but it wasn´t enough to cost him the throne. Anne Boleyn´s marriage to Henry was annulled by the highest head of their church and that simply made Elizabeth a bastard. Henry just made a law giving his daughters right to succession after their brother. He wasn´t the first king, who tried to have his bastard follow him on the throne, but most of them failed, because that wasn´t legal. Those laws had a good reason, coronation is just symbolical act, that many rulers ignored for being practicly pointless.

Amazing edit!!😍😍 What is the name of the TV show that Eleanor of Aquitaine is in?

I'm related to empress Matilda through her son Henry II : )

Say what you want but these Queens were fighters. It was never kings that held power if was always their Queens.

the Eleonor of Aquitaine is from robin hood 2010.

Köszönöm hogy elolvastad sás 🦅❤️🐝 madár 🐦🐑 szív 💓 ló 🐎💓

Can someone PLEASE give me a list of these shows/or movies?! Please!!

@ralucamaria5311

5 жыл бұрын

The White Queen, The White Princess, The Tudors, Reign, and there are more, but i don't know all of them..

I love shows or movies about royalty but can someone plz tell me the names of those shows so I can watch them

What about Queen Victoria?

@morriganjones4656

5 жыл бұрын

Amelia Pendragon she was queen of Great Britain not England

@twinbulls1980

5 жыл бұрын

Plus, that would fast forward 200 years since Elizabeth I. This video would be so much longer! Lol

Hey, this awesome i love it, the music and the clips. But what are the movies or tv shows you used. I know the Margaret of Anjou, Elizabeth Woodville, Anne Neville and Elizabeth of York are all from the White Queen and Catherine of Aragon, Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour, Anne Von Cleves, Kathyrn Howard and Catherine Parr are all from the Tudors. But i was wondering about the earlier clips of Empress Matilda,Eleonor of Aquitaine,Isabella of Angouleme,Isabella of France,Isabella of Valois,Catherine of Valois.

@jocelynpettenato183

8 жыл бұрын

Empress Matilda is from the pillars of the earth, eleanor of aquitaine and isabella of angouleme is from robin hood with russel crowe, isabella of france is from world without end

@twinbulls1980

5 жыл бұрын

ferzy09 Her rule was brief, if not just disputed. It definitely was a progressive idea for King Henry I to acknowledge her as his heir and request it of his people, though.

hello what movies or series have u seen them

What show or movie is the second part from?

do you have the movies or tv show names?

0:19 Poe Dameron😊😊

May I ask from which movie/series the first scene is?

@QueenAnneBoleyn6

9 жыл бұрын

MissDatherinePierce I'm not 100% sure but I think it's from the Pillars of the Earth

I wonder if anyone can help me. Some series and movies that appear in the video I already know and have seen, but others do not. Aside from Pillars of the Earth, The White Queen and The Tudor, what are the series? Please help me. I love so much history and would love to learn a little more about each queen who appears here. Thanks.

@acdragonrider

8 жыл бұрын

+Vitória Mendonça Check out the Isabel and Carlos, Rey Emperor series from Spanish television. Their stuff is REALLY good and accurate.

@vitoriamendonca646

8 жыл бұрын

I will. Thanks. : )

@acdragonrider

8 жыл бұрын

+Vitória Mendonça No prob :) The series are available on their individual RTVE sites. But if you can't understand Spanish, the full Isabel series is available for free on Hulu. In any event watch Isabel first; it's technically the prequel and it is the best of the two imo.

@vitoriamendonca646

8 жыл бұрын

+Acdragonrider Videos Thanks. I can speak spanish fluently. You really help.

@tamaradimarco878

6 жыл бұрын

There is also Reign in there

Where did you get the clips of Mary I and Elizabeth I?

@MarinaKaFai

7 жыл бұрын

Mary I: Lady Jane Elizabeth I: The Virgin Queen

Part 2 = queens- mary stewart, anne, Victoria, Elizabeth II, camilia ??

@morriganjones4656

5 жыл бұрын

VC YT Camilla will never be queen she will instead be princess consort

@lilovs9952

4 жыл бұрын

Mary Stewart??

😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

What show is this?

Hey can someone tell me the names of the series used? I recognize The Tudors and Reign but not the others

@A.Olivetti

6 жыл бұрын

the white queen, the white princess

@gabrielas3796

6 жыл бұрын

Pillars of the earth,World without end,Robin Hood (2010),The hollow crown,The white queen,The Tudors,Lady Jane,Reign and The virgin queen.

the second clip looks out of place because it is a man not a woman, so why is he in this video when its about queens not kings?

0:04 whats a movie?

If youre gonna put mary queen of scots then you shouldve put Jane Grey

What show is empress Matilda from

5 жыл бұрын

faith bejin pillars of the earth (tv show)

Where is the scene at 1:38 seconds from?

@gabrielas3796

6 жыл бұрын

The white queen

0:35 and 1:06 whats a movie...?

@charlweb1

8 жыл бұрын

The first clip is taken from Robin Hood (2010). The second clip is taken from the BBC tv film Henry V (2012).

Mary I wasn´t Queen of England...

@introvert211

7 жыл бұрын

Elizabeth Tudor Mary Tudor? Or Mary Queen of Scots? Cause Mary I is Mary Tudor, and she was queen of England.

@I-m.Just.a.Girl_

5 жыл бұрын

OMG

@idontgiveafaboutyou

5 жыл бұрын

It would’ve been nice if she was☺️

@walahiimnotwhite385

4 жыл бұрын

She was

@scottibrown3274

4 жыл бұрын

If you are talking about Mary, Queen of Scots than yes you are right. But you said Mary I, which implies that you are talking about the eldest daughter of Henry VIII, who was a Queen of England

Too little for Mary Queen of Scots and Elizabeth I....

@michaeldehaviland6659

6 жыл бұрын

narcissusinmirror has

@idontgiveafaboutyou

5 жыл бұрын

We’ve enough of Elizabeth l and less of the previous queens

Who's the one at :35 and where is that clip from?

@charlweb1

8 жыл бұрын

:35 is Isabella of Angouleme, wife of King John of England. The clip is taken from Robin Hood (2010)

@EvanSol919

8 жыл бұрын

***** Thanks!

0:08 0:52 1:04 whats Show

Why does the singer sound as though she’s going to throw up ? Absolutely ghastly song.

Mary, Queen of Scots was the rightful Queen of England, if traditional inheritance rights were to be respected. Elizabeth I was a usurper by this same principle. First, start with the fact that Henry VIII declared his two daughters to be bastards. He rescinded this attribution later in life, when it was doubtful he would add to his brood. However, Mary and Elizabeth's half-brother Edward VI once again branded them bastards in his Device for the Succession. Leaving these facts aside, Henry annulled his marriage to Catherine of Aragon on the principle that his marriage to her was invalid. Neither the Catholic Church nor reformers like Martin Luther and Englishman William Tyndale accepted his argument. Moreover, if Mary I was queen by right, her parents' marriage, and Elizabeth's parents' marriage couldn't *both* have been valid because they would have been concurrent with each other. Either one or the other was the legitimate marriage. Finally, start with the simple definition that bastardy is the condition of being born out of wedlock or through adultery. Adultery is illicit sex. Sex between non-married people is illicit sex. Anne and Henry almost certainly started sleeping together after their visit to Calais on a diplomatic mission to the King of France. They were "officially" (but secretly) married on January 25, 1533. Less than four weeks later, Anne announced in open court of her desire to eat apples. This was clearly a pregnancy craving and intended to signify to the court that she was pregnant. This sign seems premature for a woman who should only have been pregnant since late January at the earliest. Elizabeth I was born on September 7, 1533. Do the math - that's less than eight months gestation time. In other words, Henry and Anne were engaged in extramarital sex before their official wedding date. Moreover, it wasn't until May 23rd that Henry and Katherine's marriage was declared invalid. Henry was a bigamist until that point in time. Elizabeth was a bastard in law and a bastard in fact and she had no right to the throne. Fitting, though, as the Tudor Dynasty was founded on bastardy. Henry Tudor's father's father was ostensibly Owen Tudor. Owen Tudor married the Dowager Queen of England. Queen Catherine de Valois was the daughter of a king (Charles VI of France), the wife of a king (Henry V of England), and the mother of a king (Henry VI of England). To suppose that she would settle down with a Welsh squire and her servant is a bit of a stretch. She had relations (personal but perhaps also sexual) with Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Duke of Somerset. The Beauforts were bastards and descended from John of Gaunt (as were both the Lancastrians and the Yorkists). The Tudors' blood claim to the throne came from this bastard filiation to John of Gaunt - although, it was via Henry Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort, that they claimed the throne. Notably, Henry IV, the legitimate son of John of Gaunt, barred his Beaufort half-siblings from the throne via decree. Margaret married Edmund Tudor (named for his true father?) to produce the future Henry VII. Henry VII's wife was Elizabeth of York, daughter of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville. Edward and Elizabeth's marriage was done in secret and not even announced until five months later; when marriage negotiations were already underway with a French princess. Additionally, Edward and Elizabeth's marriage was declared invalid because the Bishop of Bath and Wells (Edward's two-time Lord Chancellor) testified that he had secretly married Edward to another woman before his marriage to Elizabeth Woodville (making Edward a bigamist just like his grandson Henry VIII). On these grounds, the issue of Edward and Elizabeth's marriage were declared illegitimate and Richard III became king. The act that invalidated Edward and Elizabeth's children was called Titulus Regius and Henry VII had all copies destroyed to bury the notion that his wife was illegitimate (a copy was later discovered at the start of the 17th Century). So there you go, King Henry VII may have been the son of a bastard; his mother was only a contender for the throne via an invalidated bastard descent from the son of King Edward III; and the Queen Consort was also a bastard. Of course, if the Tudors were not legitimate rulers of England, neither would Mary, Queen of Scots have been (although her right to the throne of Scotland would still stand). Therefore, Margaret Pole (née Plantagenet), first cousin to Elizabeth of York and daughter of Edward IV and Richard III's brother George, Duke of Clarence, would have been the rightful Queen of England. Instead, she and most of her sons and a grandson were executed (very bloodily, in her case) during Henry VIII's reign on trumped-up charges. Power ultimately needs no justification.

@laraanne5133

4 жыл бұрын

Well henry legitimated elizabeth also she is until now the greatest monarch of england and all time for awoman

@renshiwu305

4 жыл бұрын

@@laraanne5133 Why is she the greatest monarch in English history? She didn't sink the Armada; the weather did that. She didn't write Shakespeare; the man himself did that. Her religious policy satisfied no one but herself and delayed conflict until the next century, when it helped lead to civil war in the time of Charles I. Elizabeth looms larger in the historical conscience than she ought because of the iconography of her reign: virgin queen, rises from a disgraced state to queenship, and the emblem of England's lone stance against the foreign threat of Spain and France. A lot of things happened in her time but, then, all of Europe was experiencing the Renaissance, the Age of Discovery, and the Wars of Religion. There is nothing particular to Elizabeth that accounts for the uniqueness of the times. The 16th Century was a pivotal moment for many states in Europe: Isabella and Ferdinand united the Crowns of Spain, to be taken over by their grandson and his heirs; Sweden broke away from the Union of Kalmar and became independent; the Low Countries came under Habsburg overlordship, and, eventually, the Dutch Revolt broke out; the wars of religion erupted in Germany and the Emperor's rule was threatened; France experienced its own wars of religion as the Valois Dynasty came to an end; the Grand Duchy of Muscovy turned into the Tsardom of Russia, and the ground was laid for the future empire spanning Eurasia. I will say that, as many of Shakespeare's greatest plays concerned royal succession (e.g. "Hamlet," "King Lear," "Macbeth," "Richard III," and the Henriad), and, as Elizabeth's actions or inactions affected the succession, she may have indirectly contributed to this artistic legacy. That said, Elizabeth was mostly concerned with securing her own rule, and that is merely the baseline requirement of a monarch. I would suggest that Elizabeth's grandfather, Henry VII, was a more consequential monarch and in a positive way. He united the country after the Wars of the Roses, he created the basis for future kingship, and he established a sound treasury and fiscal policy. William III, often overlooked, was also a superior monarch in my estimation. You could say that George I - not through his own initiative, but because of him nonetheless - established the primacy of Parliament, which was a welcome development. I view Elizabeth as a Bill Clinton character: an intelligent and skilled charmer, who had capabilities, but utilized them primarily to maintain her own political position and without creating a lasting legacy beyond her time in power. Like Bill Clinton, too, she was a "Third Way" compromiser, in religion, as already stated, and in her foreign policy - that primarily relied on feinting and dithering, to make other countries think she would marry this or that prince, and alter their calculations about geopolitics.

@laraanne5133

4 жыл бұрын

@@renshiwu305 firstly she saved england from death also the armada she took theire gold and make the first conolises in america also shakespear and many writers appeared because of her in her reign she madd emgland one of the most powerful economic power in the world go search your information you will know that you are wrong

@laraanne5133

4 жыл бұрын

@@renshiwu305 don t compare that silly bil clinton to elizabeth bill clinton only knows sex... elizabeth was very serious she married to her country she sacroficed her life for it

@laraanne5133

4 жыл бұрын

@@renshiwu305 wow uou are amary scott fan it is very clear why you are talking bad about elizabeth while still the votes of historicans she is the greatest monarch in all history also brit vote 2002 bbc she was the highest queen and monarch beeing in 7th place