Check out Hoymiles for your Solar Micro-Inverters Today! geni.us/Inverters

@jarallah11

11 ай бұрын

Challenging the topic 😒 !!!? With whom "you" you take summaries from white and brown people, and then you raise your nose to the camera for all of us to see what in inside them , talking down. what do you really add to science invention or something ? N

@stevenhansen5560

11 ай бұрын

Amen! Love your content, but adds a spectacle that is not necessary.

@lii1Il

11 ай бұрын

Would LOVE 💕 to hear more on hydrogen compression tech you spoke of. I've been looking for that for a long time now. Ty! Great vid!

@djmccullough9233

11 ай бұрын

Calling this thing anything other than an inefficient science experiment is disingenuous. The amount of power required to electrolyze any useful amount of hydrogen is massive (especially considering the output of a solar array). The tiny solar cell and limited efficiency of it means there is not a chance in hell this device creates enough hydrogen to usefully do ANYTHING productive. Fact: people have been making these since Radio shack was still around, hooking up their solar panels to a transformer then dipping electodes in water. This, isnt remotely a new invention nor is it anything that will ever be useful to adults. Children might learn something about physics from it, but this kind of tech wont be powering anything soon. Solar is already too inefficient, and electrolysis loses the vast majority of that energy just to break the atomic bonds and give you the hydrogen. the sad truth is if you wanted to drive an electric motor, you'd get more usable energy just hooking the solar cell straight to your battery pack than adding the step of electrolysis.

@Obscurai

11 ай бұрын

No matter how you store the H2, the danger for local storage at home is problematic regardless of the pressure since H2 is more explosive than natural gas. Even storing gasoline in a fuel can is generally not recommended let alone H2 in a compressed tank that is prone to H2 embrittlement. H2 is just a tough gas to use safely especially in a domestic household setting.

You swivel between two cameras so much in your videos now. It's kinda distracting.

@warmon6

11 ай бұрын

Agree. if he had a 2nd person that was also talking in the videos, i could understand the frequent switching to focus on the talking person. For a single person, it is very distracting.

@henrybailey6111

11 ай бұрын

Yup Agreed. Focus on just one camera and you can use the second camera from a 45 degree angle, if you like, but don't look at it. But TBH there are so many different images added that interest is maintained and it is not necessary to use the second camera. Keep up the good work. Excellent videos otherwise!!! 😊

@MM-sf3rl

11 ай бұрын

Agree. Very cheesy.

@brettrq

11 ай бұрын

​@@henrybailey6111😢

@paulodonoghue5078

11 ай бұрын

I agree, the swivelling is distracting me from what is great informative content

Long and short, this is what the world needs a hell of a lot more R&D on everything. And this is what I think this channel promotes the idea of being able to look at the pros and cons, subjectively and accurately and deeply. I love this channel. Scientific breakthroughs with the world needs.

@millanferende6723

8 ай бұрын

It would be great to see heating in homes and factories using hydrogen. That alone bypasses the whole "40% fuel cell efficiency." And if you think about it, how much of that energy do we need as heat?

@SeaJay_Oceans

6 ай бұрын

Everyone seems to just gloss over the dangers to Life and danger to Earth in destroying Water for energy... The system will create loss of water on Earth... That is insanely a horrible bad idea... unless they send out space probes to grab comets and slam them into the pacific ocean for a refill, all technology destroying water for energy should be banned.

When comparing a fuel cell vehicle to a battery electric vehicle, please remember: fuel cells produce DC current just like a battery. So you will need an inverter for either of them, to power your home or your EV's AC induction motor (lightest, most efficient and most flexible type so commonly used in EVs). Most batteries can return 85 - 90% of the energy you put in. If you can get the hydrolyzer up to 71% efficiency, and the fuel cell up to a similar level of efficiency, you will get about ½ of your energy input back out (√½ ≈ 0.71). If they can get the hydrolyzer and the fuel cell, each, up to 90% efficiency, you'll get about 81% of your energy input back out again (0.9 × 0.9 = 0.81). That's getting competitive with a battery. 95% efficiency on each would make it fully competitive. Solhyd is claiming they can hit that with their hydrolyzer. But fuel cells ... not there. There are high-efficiency fuel cells but they use a lot of platinum, which makes them hideously expensive (figure about $250k for 25 kW output; 25 kW is about 33⅓ horsepower). There are cheaper ones, based on nickel, which are nowhere near their level of efficiency (~40%). 0.9 × 0.4 = 0.36 or 36% round-trip efficiency, which is still less than half of a battery. WRT storing hydrogen: there are carbon-wrapped tanks which can take 700 bar (over 10k psi) but you will need to expend a LOT of energy on the pumps to put it in there. And it will still take a larger volume, compared to gasoline. Metal hydrides typically only need about 500 psi (lower pumping losses) but fueling is exothermic and expelling the fuel is endothermic. Rodger Billings drove a hydrogen-fueled Cadillac in Jimmy Carter's inauguration parade, with the hydrogen stored in metal hydrides. The fuel tanks had tubes running through them; engine exhaust went through the tubes when the engine was running (providing heat for the endothermic release) and cool air was pumped through the tubes when fueling (providing cooling during the exothermic fueling). The big problem is that metal hydride powders are very heavy; you're lucky if 5% of your total stored mass is hydrogen. 1 kg of hydrogen has about the same energy content as 1 gallon of gasoline. That's 20 kg / 44 pounds of mass to carry the equivalent of 1 gallon of gasoline. Gasoline weighs about 6.5 pounds / gallon and you don't need a 500 psi-rated tank to hold it. You talk about a Solhyd panel making 250 liters of H₂ / day. I'm assuming you mean 250 liters at STP; you did mention it was low pressure. 1 kg of H₂ is about 12k liters at STP. You would need about 48 such panels to make the hydrogen energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gasoline per day. If they can do that for 30 years ... the per-kg cost might be reasonable. Hydrogen makes sense in only 2 cases: 1 - You need to store the energy for weeks or months at a time. Batteries are good for a few days, maybe a week, but not for longer timespans. The Apollo capsules used hydrogen / oxygen fuel cells to carry energy for an 11-12 day mission, providing heat and potable water as byproducts. Battery tech of the time was nowhere close to that storage capacity and the byproducts were useful. Artemis will use a lot of solar panels and some batteries; they won't be hauling all of their energy when they blast off the pad. Apollo had no choice; solar tech wasn't ready, back then, either. 2 - You need to transfer the energy much faster. If you are refueling a vehicle and need to refuel in a handful of minutes, rather than having a hour, hydrogen makes some sense. An Over-The-Road semi can store liquid hydrogen (LH2) for 500 miles and you can refuel it in minutes. A battery-electric semi ... good luck getting the charging time for 500 miles down under an hour. A driver is going to want to spend as much of their time as possible in motion (they get paid by the mile, not by the hour) so many heavy-truck manufacturers are actively working on hydrogen fuel cell rigs, running on LH2. Ditto for electric airplanes. They're hoping that, if they build the demand, the supply / infrastructure will come. There are three "miracles" needed before we can transition to a hydrogen economy: the cost of production needs to come down, the cost of storage needs to come down and the cost of usage needs to come down. The Solhyd panel appears to be working on the first one. All three are making evolutionary gains but ... I think we're still decades away from a hydrogen economy being realistic.

@coffeeisgood102

11 ай бұрын

Concerning semi-tractor trailer trucks…remember there are laws in the USA limiting the time a driver can spend behind the wheel. So recharging the batteries in under a hour is not an issue. After 6 hours of sleep the driver will awaken to a fully charged vehicle and be back on his or her route again.

@HeyChickens

10 ай бұрын

I think battery charging time issues could be totally resolved by having a system of battery swap-outs. Each vehicle would have a yearly subscription to a battery swap-out service. The battery packs would be charged up by the swap-out service, and the driver would simply switch out battery packs. This could be done much faster than even standard fuel fill-ups! The swap-out service would not have to worry about their batteries being stolen any more than a gas station would worry about their barbecue propane tanks getting stolen. The customer would only have one battery pack at any moment anyways.

@casperyourfriendlyghost7552

2 ай бұрын

Thank you for such great data. I believe Bob Lazar was using Uranium Hydride in his corvette which had a greater range than stock all stored in three scuba tanks.

It makes more sense to just store the electricity given how much it takes to create it and then use a fuel cell to get it back, IF it’s for an EV or home use. Only makes sense when there is huge over production that the batteries would be very large or expensive, or for uses like air travel where battery weight is a limiting factor

@anydaynow01

11 ай бұрын

Yep that is what will be needed for seasonal storage. A large array that powers the house, charges the batteries to run the house and charge the vehicles at night, and provides seasonal storage for the higher latitude countries when there is plenty of sun in the summer. The H2 would be best stored as ammonia for use in the winter when solar is very weak or nonexistent for months at a time. A home would size their NH3 storage tanks based on how long and severe their winters are. Also with a freezing point of -70 C the tanks won't need very much insulation. Or they can just run their home off of RNG in the winter 😅. These also have the huge benefit of not using ground water to make H2 to preserve our fresh water resources.

@Real_MisterSir

8 ай бұрын

It makes sense to develop for heavy freight industries like rail, but especially shipping - and also notably lightweight air transport too such as ultralight planes and drones. Having on-harbor production facilities to utilize wave, wind, and solar energy to not just power the grid, but to also use excess energy to directly produce store the energy as hydrogen, and then fuel cargo ships directly as they dock and load/unload. You also have a vast abundance of hydro right on location, and pretty much all freight harbors of the future will become energy hubs through direct grid link, as well as hydrogen production. There is already a multi-billion investment in Power-to-X in Nordic countries to become the main European supplier of green hydrogen in the coming decade, specifically utilizing these methods - even going as far as building a massive artificial island in the north sea with the exclusive purpose of creating this infrastructure at a multinational grid level.

@costamarques3900

7 ай бұрын

s NOT the future. It is pushed by the elite because its function similarities to regular fossil fuel setups. Similar maintenance similar distribution and profits. The catch is that you need electricity to produce. You need to produce 50-55 kWh of electricity. to have 40 kWh hydrogen energy. Be careful with science that approach subjects with a preconception and then they impose it on the evidence.

Thanks for talking about this technology! But just as some others have commented: in your comparison you leave out the problem with the fuel cells, that they require a worse kind of mining than the battery materials, which by the way are shifting now already to a broader mix with less hard to produce elements like sodium, Sulphur, Iron... and as much as I liked the idea of Hydrogen in the past the more I learn about the problems with storage, round-trip efficiency the less I like it! And particularly not for home use! I don't want to live in a building, where you always have to fear it blows up, because some vibration or aging of material has let to a leak! This technology would be really useful to make fertilisers in countries that have a lot of sun! And of course make steel and concrete and all the other good stuff you can do with it, but not for space heating or transportation!

EV : Solar to electric ready to use. Hydrogen Solar : Solar to electric to hydrogen to fuel cell TBDV : GENIUS!!

@rogerstarkey5390

11 ай бұрын

You mean EV: Solar to electro ready to use 85% . Solar to hydrogen (95%) Compression -20% (76%) To fool cell -? To BATTERY -40% reconversion (45%) Or fool cell to combustion -70% (23%) . At best about half the efficiency at much greater cost. . At worst 24% efficiency. IF the claims stack up. . But those against solar are quick to say "what if it's cloudy??" In that case, no hydrogen and not alternative energy. . KISS applies. More variables More points of failure. More cost.

@GantryG

11 ай бұрын

Eh, for a hydrogen-based storage system to make sense, one has to have an application where it is ok to lose 50% of the energy put into it; generally home and ground transportation applications are not it, as more efficient tech is available for that at this time (batteries), etc. 🧐

@markmuir7338

11 ай бұрын

@@RobC1999 Have you seen the weight of pressurized tanks in hydrogen fuel cell cars? The tank weighs much more than the hydrogen it contains. Plus all the onboard venting and filling equipment. Hydrogen becomes beneficial from an energy to weight basis only over a certain size of vehicle - e.g. big rigs and above. Unless some amazing new storage method comes along.

@markmuir7338

11 ай бұрын

@@GantryG This makes sense for seasonal storage of renewable energy. The cost of storing hydrogen scales well with size - that's probably the only thing in hydrogen's favor.

@mnomadvfx

11 ай бұрын

The ideal would be a direct solar to hydrogen photosynthesis process. The problem is that it's only ideal if you only want to create hydrogen and not have a daytime power supply also.

I was a big fan of hydrogen fuel cells for cars and transportation. But the more I learned about it, the challenges just seem way to big for a national scale, especially with battery technology improving. Now, for trailers, shipping and planes, I would like to see hydrogen come through for them.

@rogerstarkey5390

11 ай бұрын

If you read the Tesla impact report, you'll see that shipping and aviation each account for 2-3% of the global CO2 footprint, it's LOT of infrastructure for surprisingly little reward.

@Israel_Two_Bit

11 ай бұрын

@@rogerstarkey5390 I dissagree, Roger. Becasue it's not just for transportation. In fact, most hydrogen is used by industry and it's a way to decarbonize steel. It's a much bigger impact than just 2-3%

@filonin2

11 ай бұрын

I see hydrogen powered cars driving around literally every day but I'm in California.

@artboymoy

11 ай бұрын

@@filonin2 it still seems like cars are at a standstill and how long would it take to create that hydrogen infrastructure? Meanwhile, a 1/4 mile from my house, there 8 or 10 Tesla chargers going in by my local grocery store. Seems a bit like VHS vs Beta to me or HDDVD vs BluRay now.

@MrKillerno1

9 ай бұрын

We just have to invest time, money and knowledge into this problem, it is far better than ev's. When a converter makes the energy and the hydrogen combines with the air, there is no pollution, when a 'tesla-like' vehicle is empty, charging on the net, takes more time than filling a hydrogen tank. Now I have also doubts about the recycling of EV's, which is not done yet, while a total H2 vehicle can be recycled totally. Of course, the storage etc is a problem now still, and the energy that comes from it is less, but it is so much around us, we just have to tackle that one tiny problem, only if every scientist and engineer that worked around the clock on EV's took 6 hours of their time to search and come up with ideas on how to make H2 more efficiently, then there were no scary stories around of people who have combustible fluids at home and the chance of it to explode. LPG tanks are here e very long time, hardly any accident happens and when H2 does escape, it makes no big bang, whereas LPG stays in it form very dangerous, think about that for a while. Just saying...

I don't like the moving between two camera shots it's unnecessary and annoying

@symonchester

11 ай бұрын

I agree... Also the 'more on that later' KZreadrs seem to be big on to keep you watching

@sidney001

11 ай бұрын

@@symonchester Yes, it would be nice if they just cut the time wasting waffle out and got to the point, in the end I just get bored and hit the back button

@GordonMullan

11 ай бұрын

Totally agree

Wow! That sounds so safe. Not combustible at all in your or your neighbors house.

Amazing video bro.. i love your vids

To drive 1 mile with a hydrogen fuel cell car, you need about 20 grammes of hydrogen. This costs at least 1 kWh to make. To store the generated hydrogen in the tank, costs another 20% energy, so that makes 1,2 kWh per mile. A solar panel with 400 Wp takes 3-4 hours to make this amount of energy around noon. On a full day the panel will be making about 2,5 kWh. Suppose you have 20 of these panels and it's sunny summer day. Then you can generate 50 kWh - which enough for 40 miles - for a big roof with 20 panels. Just barely 2 miles per panel, per sunny summer's day. Btw. a BEV will do with 1/5 th of the energy, much more feasible, and safe. When you would burn hydrogen in a combustion engine, you'll need 3 times more than for a fuel cell car. No way that you can provide your own hydrogen for that.

@solarcabin

11 ай бұрын

When your solar panels are producing excess it can be used to make green hydrogen for many uses. Heat your home, cooking and fueling a car or generator when the sun isn't shining. Hydrogen vehicles are EVs. These will be used at highway fueling stations along highways for refueling semi trucks that can not sit for hours waiting to be charged from solar or grid power.

@maxvandenberk7506

11 ай бұрын

And! Hydrogen is a greenhouse gas that will warm the world just like co2 would do

@waywardgeologist2520

11 ай бұрын

@@solarcabin or you just store in batteries

@solarcabin

11 ай бұрын

@@waywardgeologist2520 I live off grid with solar and batteries every day. Batteries weigh a lot and take up lots of room.

@junkerzn7312

11 ай бұрын

@@solarcabin I don't understand how you can say batteries take up a lot of room. And who cares about weight when they are sitting in the garage? 50kWh worth of LiFepO4 batteries take about the same volume as a modest chest freezer. Not much at all, and they can be put anywhere.

hydrogen is very hard to store and leaks out of steel containers

@wolfgangpreier9160

11 ай бұрын

And tubes and valves etc. pp.

@b1rdp3rson67

11 ай бұрын

I suggest you Watch Bob lazar explain how it's actually quite easy to store hydrogen and with the money put into one war, we'd easily have access to hydrogen storage.

Thank you, I can’t wait for it to get on the market

It is amazing the pace of development Ricki by the time you have produced a video a new development has advanced. I love this Hoymiles concept. However there is another way to store hydrogen. Hamstrung by the US government it was not allowed patents till 2017 due to its disruptive nature. That company is Plasma Kinetics. Please review their process in a future video and how its storage method could mesh with low pressure in residence production. Thanks for all your efforts.

@educateorstagnate9183

11 ай бұрын

Shhhhh! Binding hydrogen as an!hydrate is a good idea. But a suitcase size can ma ke a really big mess!

The obvious use case is higher latitudes. If you don’t get any or very low output in the winter, it’s interesting to store in the summer in H2 and use heat and electricity in the winter!

Fascinating... thank you...

My answer to your question, "Would I use..." That is a huge YES!!!

Oh. Looks like you are now talking about those very issues. Very nice.

Im glad they finalky got their website working again.

You could always rent a car for long trips. If you combine this with a hydrogen Fuel Cell and battery packs for the home. This could be the quickest way to 80-90% green energy.

@anothermike4825

11 ай бұрын

Plasma Kinetics has a unique hydrogen storage technique that allows you to store hydrogen on a film. You don't have to compress hydrogen with this system so you cut out the major cost with normal hydrogen storage. There won't be one source of green energy, we will need batteries along with everything else.

@heywoodyablowme2022

11 ай бұрын

could you use a sharing app so users could sell each other hydrogen from their homes? Availability sounds like a big problem.

I started my hydrogen conversion Solar Panel almost 20 years ago an got flack from fosil feul suplyers .thermoelectric converters and micro stadged compressors with multy gas stayges {9 defferint gasses} and a lot of regelations . hydrogen and oxygin from my setup .

direct air electrolyzer is great technology that I don't really see making sense in a home setting but it would work wonders to store energy and stabilize the grid or just to create cheap hydrogen for industries like steel where there's still no alternative to fossil fuels

@wolfgangpreier9160

11 ай бұрын

Do you know how much such electrolyzers cost and how much maintenance they require and how much energy they need and which type of energy?

@xiaoka

11 ай бұрын

it doesn't make sense to also waste energy on condensing water out of the air unless you're somewhere like the top of a mountain or something. Any place with access to water or sea water could skip that step and save some energy.

@HeyChickens

10 ай бұрын

​@@xiaokaThis technology apparently doesn't condense the water first. It splits the water vapor itself. Which is really cool!

First, thank you for continuing to produce good videos about new hydrogen technology, and for exploring the potential for using hydrogen as an energy source in the future. Everybody else, for some reason, seems to want to just put it down and ignore it. You say that hydrogen is very energy dense, then you say it has very low energy density. Of course you mean that it has high mass energy density, but low volumetric energy density. You should use those more specific terms because people need to start understanding energy density in both ways, since both are important. Also, you give the mass energy density without the storage container included, but since it requires heavy storage tanks, you should point that out immediately and give the adjusted mass energy density, including storage tanks. And then you talk about the amount of energy required to produce hydrogen as if that’s a problem, but in fact, it is exactly that reason why it does indeed have a high mass energy density. Put a lot of energy in to it to get a lot of energy out, energy is conserved. We would like to have to put even more energy in to produce it. The important factor is the efficiency of producing it, and the efficiency of extracting the energy back out again. Compare that to the efficiency of charging a battery and the efficiency of draining a battery. And compare the total volume of batteries required to store enough energy to power 1 million homes for three weeks, to the volume of hydrogen storage tanks required for the same thing. And, of course, compare the cost of the two systems also. Your focus is on residential and automobile use of hydrogen. But it’s pretty clear that hydrogen will definitely be used for applications involving heavy machinery that uses a tremendous amount of power, such as large long-distance trucks, mining vehicles, trains, maybe airplanes, perhaps involved in various industrial processes, like steel manufacturing. To that end, this hydrogen panel may make a great deal of sense for producing the needed hydrogen using large hydrogen solar farms, rather than using grid electricity along with traditional electrolyzers. I’m wondering about residential small scale infrastructure. Why not share hydrogen collection and concentration facilities among an entire block or two of houses? It’s not unheard of to have such neighborhood infrastructure. I have a box down the street that contains stuff for my neighborhood’s fiber optic cable system. Also down the street is a large transformer that steps down electricity for use in the neighborhood. Up the street is a large water storage tank. Under the street is a large sewage collection system, and a friend has a sewage pump station down the street from him.

For your question, I'm more willing. Our family typically doesn't go on long road trips. I've started watching more vlogs on themeparks to help subside those wants and it actually helps... I see people in long lines and it turns me off. Also one of my family members is involved in the airlines, so we get free flights (non-rev). Will say that I'm on the waiting game though. I want to see more done in the hydrogen sector before I consider buying alike solar panels like the ones you discussed here in this video.

they have talked of hydrogen cars for decades -- 6 fill up stations in the whole of uk -- like 3 pounds per kilo to buy

@filonin2

11 ай бұрын

Yeah, and I see them driving around every day. It's awesome to see them dump hot water out the tail pipe. The Toyota Mirai has been out since 2014 and if you're in California they are everywhere, so your points are clearly moot. You just live in a rundown country.

@margarita8442

11 ай бұрын

@@filonin2 I prefer my model Y

SUPER IDEA . POZDRAWIAM .

KISS = keep it super simple. Solar panel directly charging car EV battery. Done. Could not be simpler or cheaper, and the technology is already here, installed in our garages.

You swivel between two cameras so much in your videos now. Thats awesome so much better then others

I envision solar thermal energy and thermal batteries becoming a strong player towards solving the intermittency problem of renewable energy. A large insulated tank of sand would make a decent thermal battery for cheap. You could also use a phase change material to store more energy without a huge swing in temperature. A Stirling engine can convert a temperature difference to electricity (and also the reverse) but using heat for heating is more efficient. It might make sense to have a mix of PV panels and thermal solar panels and use both thermal and electric batteries combined with the Stirling engine for conversion. A computer program could intake all relevant information and manage the system in a smart way converting if and when it makes sense to do so. One example could be more heat becomes electricity in the summer months.

You briefly mentioned ammonia. Ammonia is used extensively in farming. So maybe it could be used to produce “green ammonia” for farmers. Perhaps in collaboration with agrovoltaics?

@wolfgangpreier9160

11 ай бұрын

The production of Ammonia from hydrogen and hydrogen from water is very straighforward, but costly. Do you want to give your farmers in your country the billions of Dollars/Euros every year they would need as incentives so they could buy the fertilizer made from solar and wind via Ammonia?

@adus123

11 ай бұрын

​@@wolfgangpreier9160we could just pass on the bill of cleaning up the mess we are in to the farmers as they are partly to blame. Tho whole industry needs to change.

@wolfgangpreier9160

11 ай бұрын

@@adus123 The farmers are to blame to try to survive under the pressure of Rewe, Unilever and many others? I don't think so. WE - yes WE CONSUMERS are to blame that we always buy the cheapest and most convenient products and not the most valuable and sustainable and healthy ones. There is no industry to change when not WE - YES WE CONSUMERS - change. And i don't see that one happening. Everybody is just much too lazy and complacent. Let the climate and mother nature show us all the errors of our ways.

@adus123

11 ай бұрын

@@wolfgangpreier9160 yes let mother nature kill us all the poor will go first then maybe the rich will start to think when they dont have anyone to do their crap for them. I did say partly to blame ie not fully to blame

Thanks a lot for sharing. I am trying to learn more about GH2, what other startups have you seen building amazing stuff in this field?

I'd love to see a fully integrated home power system that uses solar and wind to charge a battery and compress/store hydrogen, instead of cobbling it together between multiple systems. Would be good for going completely off grid, or moving toward a decentralized grid, and having multiple types of backup system.

@wolfgangpreier9160

11 ай бұрын

I'd love to see my home grown vaccum energy power generator aka Zero-Point module.

Sorry Ricki, H2 is just too hard to handle, density, even liquefied is too low, and by the time you've added sufficient safety and monitoring tech the costs are simply too high. However, in space, an elecctrolizer to remove water vapor from the atmosphere, return O2 to breathe, or store with the H2 for propellent. Combined with Sabotiere process to break down CO2, you now have an atmosphere scrubbing system, returning usable raw materials for further use.

Can see a lot of home insurance companies having issues with this.

Definitely would love to switch to a hydrogen combustion engine car. I would bet on it for the future for sure. Once we start getting more efficient at creating the compressed hydrogen then we can start worrying about making the combustion part of it more efficient.

Mr Hindenburg approves! This is the bomb! ;)

@rob6850

11 ай бұрын

Nothing could possibly go worng!

@TedToal_TedToal

11 ай бұрын

No more dangerous than gasoline tanks in our cars and natural gas lines running to our ovens, water heaters, and dryers.

@TedToal_TedToal

11 ай бұрын

@@rob6850 it was pretty funny when he said that. And of course we know that something can always go wrong. But then again, it’s pretty much the same thing as piping natural gas to our houses which we already do.

@ecoideazventures6417

11 ай бұрын

Hope you have heard of the contemporary Hindenburg in news these days!

@TedToal_TedToal

11 ай бұрын

@@ecoideazventures6417 Not sure what you’re referring to. Gas line explosions? Like the PGE one in the Bay Area or the one that happened in Guadalajara??

One situation where the hydrogen panel might be better is for example a house with a well issue, or areas where water is a more valuable or protected resource.

I have a question: can these panels collect and store the water itself rather than splitting off the H2 and O2? I'm convinced that solar is an answer for most things, tho rhere is plenty of room to improvement. If so, how much water can be collected from various humidities? Not ready to invest in H2 just yet. Very informative video, though,. Keep it up

I believe H2 is more suited at grid level, coupled with long term storage to make up for low solar during winter months. At residential level solar + battery is sufficient and efficient. Also, you provided the advertize efficiency or lab result, real world should be slightly less. H2 leaks, corrode metal pipes. You can't change physics which is on the side of Li batteries.

@Israel_Two_Bit

11 ай бұрын

It's a good point, but the future of fossil-fuel-free energy requires input from all technologies. I think it's iomportant that companies like these push researhc forward. If the people who invented the solar panel got dispirited because of the high cost and low efficiency of the first lab-level PV cells, we wouldn't have dirt cheap solar power today. The same goes for lithium batteries. If get the same level of research and development for H2, things could evolve faster and challenge batteries, because, as you say, you can't change the physics and the inherent limitation of batteries in terms of energy density. Wouldn't you agree?

@souravjaiswal-jr4bj

11 ай бұрын

@@Israel_Two_Bit Yes it might happen but improbable. The problem is h2 is a light gas, takes a lot of volume, very low liquidfying temperature, explosive, less efficient as fuel is always < batteries for most chemistry. The sheer number of breakthrough required in many fields makes it more unlikely than 3000 wh/kg LiS Solid State batteries.

My wife and I would do that in a second. Hydrogen car filled at home would work perfectly for us, no problem.

@TwoBitDaVinci

11 ай бұрын

that's good feedback... is production at home the key?

In cold climates, like here in Norway, the efficiency by using hydrogen in a fuel cell is higher. We can use the waste heat for heating 1/2 of the year. Storing H2 for winter use could be interesting if the prices on fuel cells and storage goes down. Most norwegian homes are heated by heat pumps, so about 150-300kg H2 would meet demand for charging cars and running the house in the middle of the winter, 2-3 months. We pay most for electricity in the winter.

I tried to find out more about this, "High Differential pressure water electrolysis," but came up short. Can you make video about that technology so that people like me whom haven't heard of the technology can learn more about?

I would be impressed if they did anything other than electrolysis. When you start with a 20% efficient panel then you're already doing poorly. I'll admit that 95% efficient electrolysis is damned impressive. If hydrogen gets anywhere it will need some kind of catalyst that can use sunlight or heat.

@konradcomrade4845

11 ай бұрын

Japan is going for it with a high-temp reactor, that will power some iodine-hydrogen chemical redox reactions.

If I could refuel at home, you can bet businesses would find a way to monetize the same tech and refueling stations would pop up. I dont like batteries so yes, i would switch over. Great video. You channel is awesome.

You said That most of the other 50% efficiency is lost in heat. Could it be partly used for home usage?

this is very neat I wonder if this same idea could be applied to solar panels in space to harvest 3he

@AmiGivati

11 ай бұрын

Need air as a source of water (as a source for H2)

Great explanation (as always), just one minor criticism about the video if I may, the continual switching back and forth between cameras was quite distracting.

Hello, interesting ! About this pannels, would it be interesting to use hydrogen to at least low pressure heating and cooking part of the house, like with small methaniser, but without the need to have minimum 20c° temp to work ? It also doesn't look that hard (in the case if it is interesting..) to connect solar pannel to a diy hydrogen catalyser...?

@Israel_Two_Bit

11 ай бұрын

Exactly! It makes much more sense. You can even generate it right next to where you'll store it, so there are no transmission losses along the way from the Solhyd panel to the compressor or other system.

I say Lavo system with direct electrolysis of the air like the panel..Neat there is a way we can make high pressure H2 through the electrolysis process...

Thanks for your quality videos. Couple of things though : - hydrogen is no energy source, just as a battery is no energy source; both are just storage methods. - comparison is incomplete: the whole system should be considered, fuel cells require mining too, although a lot less I guess. - comparison should include complexity: solar => electricity => hydrogen => (compression =>) storage => fuel-cell => electricity, compared to solar => electriciy => storage (battery) => electricity - Complexity again but on car level: a hydrogen car is essentially a complete BEV with a very small battery + the hydrogen-tank / fuel-cell system on top of it => very complex I'm really not convinced hydrogen will ever really make sense in cars, or even if so, it's too late, BEVs have won. So the solution for these solar panels should rather focus on storage, mainly seasonal storage, but flow-batteries are probably the better solution for this use-case. And from a global energy production versus need perspective, in the context of the transition to clean energy, efficiency is top priority over comfort which in most cases range is. Range is mostly a psychological problem => the rational solution still is BEVs.

wondering how much everything else to pipe and store the hydrogen would be and what it would be made of because of the issue of hydrogen embrittlement, this is something i have found many groups forget about prior to getting ready to produce non test scale

One of these units connected to a low pressure storage system then the can can be used for cooking and home heating. This keeps it simple and cheap. As hydrogen burns hotter than natural gas, a lot less is required. Mixed with air, the BTUs produced could be the same as natural gas, therefore no need to change boilers or cooker tops.

@Israel_Two_Bit

11 ай бұрын

One thing I did read was that burning hydrogen itself only generates water, but the high temperature of the flame makes the nitrogen and oxygen in the air react and form polluting NOx gases, so it's apparently not too safe for indoor use. But I guess it's the same with natural gas and butane, propane, etc. What do you think? Frankly, I'd love to have people over and brag about my new hydrogen cooktop. Can you image a dual or hybrid cooktop that has a burner in one side and a fuel cell that converts hydrogen to electricity and runs an induction cooktop on the other? I'd be the best of both worlds.

@Israel_Two_Bit

11 ай бұрын

Or, now that I think of it, it would be better to just have a norma panel and an electrolyzer under the burner to generate the hydrogen in situ only when you need it. That way you won't need to store it 🙂

Almost every time I see someone calculate the cost of a system amortized over a long time span, they neglect the "opportunity cost" of the initial investment. If you spend, for example, $16,000 putting 20 of these panels on your roof, and expect to use then for 30 years, you should add to the cost over that lifetime the money the $16,000 could have earned if invested somewhere. It's not unreasonable to say the $16,000 could be invested somewhere that earned 6% per year. That's close to $1,000 per year in lost returns that you could have earned if you passed on installing the panels. To make the math simpler, let's call that $50/year per panel. Each panel makes 250 liters per day, they say. 91,250 liters per year. At standard atmospheric pressure and temperature, hydrogen gas is about 0.083 g/L. That works out to about 7.5 kg per panel per year. Divide the $800 cost of the panel by a 30 year life, and the cost per year is $27. Add the $50 in opportunity cost, and the total cost is $77/year. Hmmm. That means the hydrogen is actually costing 0ver $10 per kg. And that neglect the cost of the compressors and tanks that would be needed in a practical set up. The math doesn't work.

Have you done a report on the status of HOD (Hydrogen on Demand) recently?

read an article about Hybrid photothermal-photocatalyst sheets for solar-driven overall water splitting coupled to water purification, if that is the case then I expect there to be a new revolution in the solar world.

Excellent Ricki

How do each panel fit into the recycling system. They will not last forever. Right now I am hearing problems with solar pannel recycling.

@TwoBitDaVinci

11 ай бұрын

solar panels last 20-30 years quite easily, after that yeah we'll need to make sure we have a good circular lifecycle

I may have this all wrong, but at 11:00 you show a house with 22 panels on it. Assuming 250l/panel per day, that would be creating a little less than 500g/day of hydrogen. Hardly 'industrial scale' and arguably, not enough to make this worthwhile at least for small scale operations. What am I missing?

does teslas' step-up voltage work for electrolysis? fine mesh of this thing should work in dense water vapor set up.. best storage form for hydrogen is water itself.

So can the panel be attached onto the hydrogen fueled car’s roof for unlimited range?

Hydrogen is small & can get through normal seals. You really should dig into the details of the cooling, compression & storage issues in an up front way. Purity is the issue with a fuel cell membrane. Until there is a method to cycle a cleaning of the membrane, they have a very short life in the presence of minerals & other sediment.

Hiydrogen has high energy per unit weight, but a very low energy density by volume at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. So the only way to pack enough hydrogen in a vehicle to get a reasonable range means either extremely high pressures or ultracold temperatures, both of which use up more energy. Storing electricity via water electrolysis, compressiion for storage, and fuel cell has an overall efficiency of about 27%. Storing electricity via charger and batteries is 85% efficient. So, it needs 3x more solar panels, and with the cost of the electrolyzer and hydrogen storage, it will cost more than the equivalent grid tied solar system with battery storage.

I have a question; all I have seen so far entail STORING hydrogen, but why bother with storage if you just generate it as needed and to fulfill demand. In other words a generate on demand system, and scale up or down the volume as required?

I have a neighbor whose house burned down bc he was charging his Tesla and it overheated. Evidently those battery fires are insanely hot. Both his neighbors on either side also had serious damage. Evidently Lithum fires are more common than we are being told.

I always liked this idea and also nuclear fusion both great ideas how about using ground energy the earth to help power in addition to solar/wind?

What if u take the solar panel system & directly have it apart of the car. Then directly route the hydrogen into storing it in your car? It could auto detect when it's full & maybe utilize or transfer energy to other aspects to the car once the tank is full? Just a thought? Probably can't work

I actually see an economy of Green Hydrogen/Fuel cell and EV's existing in parallel in the coming years. Also if these cells can double as a drinking water generator, that will increase its utility for self sufficient off grid systems. I would definitely consider one.

@VenomInMahEyes

11 ай бұрын

Water is generated when the hydrogen is spent when driving a hydrogen car, not while generating hydrogen itself. You see, you are splitting atmospheric water vapor into hydrogen and oxygen gas, so you don't get water during the generation process.

@Israel_Two_Bit

11 ай бұрын

@@VenomInMahEyes Yeah, but it's regenerated when you use it in the fuel cell or burn it. So Kon's idea makes total sense. It would be a double-use system: PV-energy conversion and storage unit/atmospheric water vapor collector. It's genius!!!

@TedToal_TedToal

11 ай бұрын

@@Israel_Two_Bit yeah, people that live in the desert might have water bottles on the side of their hydrogen cars for collecting the water that it produces.

@wolfgangpreier9160

11 ай бұрын

Sure if you want to pay the premium. Even E-Fuel from Porsche is cheaper.

@Soothsayer210

11 ай бұрын

@@VenomInMahEyes my understanding is, it is the condensed water vapour that is split to produce Hydrogen. The Chilian army is currently using fog nets to capture water this way. Here in this system I believe they are using the power from Solar PV to run generators to condense water vapour. So it is the water they are splitting.

A good and balanced video and I think that the choice of energy storage should be on the use case rather than politics but that's not the world we live in. I'm not liking the twin-camera style you've been using in more recent videos. The disconcerting bit is when you turn from the camera while still delivering your lines and before transitioning to the other camera shot. Some of your transitions were cut so that you'd finished one sentence on the side camera then clean cut to the main camera and was much earlier viewing.

Being that it's pretty explosive, I vote for using most of the green hydrogen we can produce to power freight ships, locomotives and backup/peaker power plants. If there's enough left over then perhaps in homes.

@wolfgangpreier9160

11 ай бұрын

1.: How do you propose to produce hydrogen? 2.: How do you propose to store the hydrogen? 3.: How do you propose to transport the hydrogen? 4.: How do you propose it should be converted in "freight ships, locomotives and backup/peaker power plants"? By burning it? Via fuel cells?

@waywardgeologist2520

11 ай бұрын

Or just combine with carbon dioxide out of the air and create methane and methanol.

Hi, at the moment I fuel our AGA cooker on natural gas from the mains here in the Uk - Hydrogen is the only possible alternative fuel for the future. I truly want someone to succeed in separating hydrogen from water or air - and soon please.

Solhyde panels are to solar panels with third party electrolyzers what a sealed beam headlight is to a headlamp with separate bulb, reflector, and lens. 🙂

What about the recycling of Solar Panels and Batteries? That cost also needs to be factored in, especially in the long run...

Why couldn't we add electrolyzers to vehicles powered by the regenerative braking?

The thing is, he longer we wait the longer it’ll take. Just like battery technology in the last 100 stunted by a cheaper option (on the surface) that’s lead if nothing else to terrible pollution issues, that initself has significantly reduced over its years of production, I’m pro hydrogen as well. Right now, just like solar, was 30 years ago, and to this day, still is less than 25% efficient, but it’s overall earth benefit is significant.

Plasma kinetics has a working ambient temperature and pressure hydrogen storage system. But its discharge qty is limited.

Hybrid parabolic/photovoltaic would be much better for this. It would use the high temperature wasted heat to produce hydogen from water and the photovoltaic cell would have increased efficiency due to high light intensity.

high pressure storage direct to a fuel cell maybe. but all the extra hardware to create a fueling station? they scent methane and propane to be aware of leaks. how are you going to detect leaks before the boom point? directly to storage with a fuel cell would even out spikes in good and bad solar days though with a fuel cell and batteries for storage. ut for the cost of the hydrogen system, you could just get more batteries and be safer.

if you can further miniturize the thing to be able to be strapped to my car roof, all I gotta do is fill the device with water for roadtrips and literally just go to gas stations with water and air stations to fill up.

never let it be known that given the same research and development in this industry that was used to perfect the ice car, the electric car is here to stay

i kinda also wanna be able to generate electricity from excess hydrogen made. maybe use it in a stove burner? IDK. the best part about having liquid hydrogen stored is that you can use it whenever. I seen people make hydrogen powered generators work just the same as gas ones.

Current fuel cells require platinum for the anode construction - how scalable is this ?

How does this approach compare to using state of the art solar panels fed into EnerVenue's nickel hydrogen battery?

this was my thinking idea 10 years ago

When we get to home H2 production and storage solutions, this will really be a game changer. There will be so much excess solar capacity in the near future, any inefficiency associated with electrolysis and H2 storage will be be moot. Stored H2 is going to be much more convenient than a big heavy battery storage.

I made a solar powered hydrogen cell around 15 years ago. People have been doing this for a long time. That's how I got the idea to make one.

I have 89% humidity, we have it in abundance and yes I would get one immediately if I could afford one. My attic get to 150 F it would be mice to not run AC to cool the house down from the frying pan above my head.

Good vid Bats will win out. Simpler, more efficient and in the minds of people-safer! And with Bat energy capacity increasing... Cheers

I mentioned on one of your other videos about the hydrogen sponge material that could be made out of sugar and uretha explain buy a man named Robert Murray on KZread. And there's another man on KZread, who killed the hydrogen car. Runs a Corvette on for hydrogen sponge filled tanks at normal atmosphere for 300 miles. Thank you for this video I'll add it to my likes. But what do I know

Don't forget the old steam workhorse... now also with sunlight via lens

All the BLEVE's will look fantastic.

I've been saying for years to keep an eye on these guys, thanks for giving them attention !

Correction, current fuel cells are something like 70-80% efficient. The DoE's numbers are for the entire round trip efficiencies (Even bEVs are something like 60-70% efficient according to the same metrics). BEVs are still far better in my opinion (a 20% gap is massive especially when you consider it's closer to 80-90% efficient when you get the power directly from your own solar systems) but hydrogen isn't a "dead option." In addition, the weight aspect (there's currently something like a 8:1 ratio for storage of hydrogen) is kinda glossed over. That still makes it "better" weight to energy compared to a bEV, but it's not as simple as taking the raw weight of hydrogen. That being said, I doubt these panels will be "coming to your home." Fuel cells are kinda expensive enough where I'm pretty sure for the average home a 5-10kWh sodium ion power wall will be cheaper. This seems more likely to be used at scale in places where there's a lot of land and a lot of sunlight on an industrial scale. These would likely go to the consumer hydrogen market for bigger vehicles (long haul trucks, aeroplanes etc which need the energy density) rather than the consumer market which will do just fine with BEVs.

@Israel_Two_Bit

11 ай бұрын

Peru rings a bell. And Australia

@CHIEF_420

11 ай бұрын

🧂

I never see the efficiency data of batteries take into consideration the energy required to mine and produce them. I’d like to know how that energy input would offset the total efficiency of a battery over its typical lifetime.

It sounds fantastic that it will soon be the cheapest way to produce hydrogen. But until all the inefficiencies of storing it are met, it still does not make sense as an automobile fuel. Also in the process from solar to power at the wheels. How does the efficiency compare to solar to power at the wheels in a BEV.?

Ricki, have you ever heard of Dr. James Tour, a chemist, from Rice University. He has stated that he and his phd students have been able to produce H2 for negative dollars! There are some catches to this number hope you can bring down to understandable English what he is saying. He is a person to keep an eye on in this regard and other endeavors that he is involved with. Pax et Bonum!

Finally a presentation from you where you chose not to blow smoke [censored]

Plasma Kinetics has a unique hydrogen storage technique that allows you to store hydrogen on a film. You don't have to compress hydrogen with this system so you cut out the major cost with normal hydrogen storage.

@chrisheath2637

11 ай бұрын

I looked at this from a technical standpoint - it is a lab party-trick, with very little practical use. Some people jump on the funding bandwagon with essentially nice-sounding but impractical ideas...

@anothermike4825

11 ай бұрын

@@chrisheath2637 do you have any examples of what you mean?

Excellent subject!

hmmm, i wonder what effect it would have to dehumidify the air en masse. It would definitely make it cooler, but what else.