Boeing HUGE Engine Plans on 747 is Coming…

Boeing HUGE Engine Plans on 747 is Coming…
===
#fligavia #boeing #airbus #boeing747 #aviations
===
00:00 Intro
00:26 The reason why Boeing has the plan to launch the 747 aircraft with two engines
01:25 How would the comeback of the ''Queen of the Skies'' change?
04:35 The challenges
07:08 Impact on the global aviation industry
09:41 Concluding
===
Boeing HUGE Engine Plans on 747 is Coming…
Could there be a Boeing 7 4 7 returning to the skies with just two engines? To replace the work that four or five engines used to do, Boeing has a bold plan to equip the 'Queen of the Skies' with two new engines, claiming that it will have airlines lining up to order when the 7 4 7 makes its comeback. It's truly something to look forward to. Let's explore how this project will transform our 'Queen'!
Boeing HUGE Engine Plans on 747 is Coming…
To begin, let’s find out the reason why Boeing has the plan to launch the 7 4 7 aircraft with two engines.
First of all, that is meeting the demand of the market. The current aviation industry prioritizes fuel-efficient and cost-effective aircraft. Developing a twin-engine version of the 7 4 7 could meet this demand and attract airlines.
Secondly, that is the advancement in engine technology. Modern engines are more powerful, efficient, lighter, and emit fewer emissions than older engines. This means that two engines today can perform the work that previously required four engines.
Thirdly, the 7 4 7 has never been a bad aircraft, and many passengers still enjoy the flying experience aboard it. The main issue is that its four engines are too financially burdened. However, this problem could be solved by redesigning the aircraft featuring two engines.
Boeing HUGE Engine Plans on 747 is Coming…
This change is primarily about the new engines. With two new engines, how would the comeback of the ''Queen of the Skies'' change?
Firstly, there is the advancement in engine technology and aircraft structure. The development of turbofan engines and composite materials has made twin-engine aircraft feasible, replacing traditional four-engine aircraft.

Пікірлер: 94

  • @tomdavis8757
    @tomdavis875719 күн бұрын

    So they can do this but cannot get the 777x certified? I think this is bogus propaganda

  • @deanwood1338
    @deanwood133819 күн бұрын

    That will never happen… will need new wings, fuselage reinforcements, probably landing gear too. Will cost more money than a clean sheet design and will take an age to get done. Will also cut in to 777x sales.

  • @t8polestarcyan22
    @t8polestarcyan2216 күн бұрын

    "Twin engined 747s" are on the way. It's called the 777x.

  • @AthosRac
    @AthosRac19 күн бұрын

    So they'll do the same mistake they did with the 737. Instead of making a NEW plane, they will refit the old project and call it a new plane.

  • @pvisit

    @pvisit

    19 күн бұрын

    and they will add MCAS of course.

  • @antoniosoares2903

    @antoniosoares2903

    19 күн бұрын

    Are you a dumb guy?

  • @drjojo4624

    @drjojo4624

    18 күн бұрын

    @@antoniosoares2903no - knowing Boeing management he’s bang on the money

  • @flamboone9727

    @flamboone9727

    17 күн бұрын

    Not the same. The 737 could not fit the new engines under it’s wings so they opted for changing the wing to allow the engines to be mounted higher which created the requirement for the MCAS system.

  • @lymancopps5957

    @lymancopps5957

    17 күн бұрын

    @@pvisit A 2 engine 747 would not need MCAS. The reason MCAS was added to the MAX was because the CFM Leap engines would no longer fit under the wings.

  • @Europeanfriends
    @Europeanfriends19 күн бұрын

    Let’s hope ! Best plane ever. Flew it over 150 times and want to fly it again 😊

  • @antoniosoares2903

    @antoniosoares2903

    19 күн бұрын

    Are you a dumb guy?

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    yep the queennn

  • @dewyakana1543
    @dewyakana15439 күн бұрын

    Good luck, Boeing.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    8 күн бұрын

    thanks ✈️

  • @rickwhite4137
    @rickwhite413719 күн бұрын

    I'm sure the 747 can fly with two engines. But can it fly with _one_ engine, which is necessary if one engine fails?

  • @antoniosoares2903

    @antoniosoares2903

    19 күн бұрын

    Are you a dumb guy?

  • @Linclad65
    @Linclad6519 күн бұрын

    Bring on a twin engined A380 instead. Far more sensible.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks for your comment

  • @Prodagist

    @Prodagist

    19 күн бұрын

    A twin engine A380 is far from possible with today's engines. The A380 is a fair amount heavier than the 747, and therefore requires more thrust. The A380 originally boasted 280,000 lbs of thrust across its 4 engines. The issue with that is, there's no engine powerful enough to match that in a twin engine configuration, The A380 already didn't have good take off and landing performance, so giving is less thrust is an absolute no, and the most powerful engine available, the GE9X, produces 115,000 lbs of thrust, so in a twin configuration it'd be 230,000 lbs, which is a 50,000 lbs loss from the A380s original amount of thrust. I don't disagree that a Twin A380 is more viable than a Twin 747, as boeing already has the 777, which functionally is already a twin 747, but a twin A380 is simply impossible with today's engines

  • @neilpickup237

    @neilpickup237

    19 күн бұрын

    ​@Prodagist Well short of what is required. Remember, a twin has to be able to take off and climb on a single engine, rather than three on a quad.

  • @JPB57

    @JPB57

    15 күн бұрын

    @@Prodagist no only that, the complete wing has to be replaced because the present wing is not designed for 115000 pounds of thrust (or more) at one point. In other words it is impossible to put only 2 engines on a wing designed for 4 even if you could have the good engines

  • @boballen4665
    @boballen466518 күн бұрын

    The new aircraft is called the 777X, made by Boeing. A redesigned 747 is not going to happen.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    18 күн бұрын

    thanks for your comment

  • @larkjones7432
    @larkjones743219 күн бұрын

    I think the main issue will be convincing the public that the twin engine 747 is just as reliable, efficient and SAFE as the old 747

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks for sharing your thoughts

  • @lymancopps5957
    @lymancopps595717 күн бұрын

    The 747 with 2 engines would be the first dual engine super jumbo. Long haul airlines like Emirates would line up to buy it. Also the 747 was the best cargo carrier plane ever designed, capable of flipping the entire front up to load large containers, something no other plane could do.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    17 күн бұрын

    thanks for your feedback

  • @user-jf9zd3nb5n
    @user-jf9zd3nb5n19 күн бұрын

    単純に双発の747見たい

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    yep surely people still want to see it

  • @debugstore
    @debugstore19 күн бұрын

    The 747 design is ancient. I think Boeing has learned its lesson with the 737; shoehorning new engines into a 1950s airframe is problematic, at the very least.

  • @Buciasda33

    @Buciasda33

    19 күн бұрын

    They haven't learned anything. Change my mind, LoL.

  • @antoniosoares2903

    @antoniosoares2903

    19 күн бұрын

    Are you a dumb guy?

  • @Prodagist
    @Prodagist19 күн бұрын

    Boeing definitely won't be making a twin 747, lol. The 777 is, functionally at least, already a twin engined 747. The 777 can carry just as many passengers, just as much cargo, all while being able to fly further, land at smaller airports, and be more fuel efficient. Boeing has no reason to invest money into making a twin engine 747 when they already have a plane that does exactly what a twin engined 747 would do, but better

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks for sharing your thoughts

  • @Jeffreykum
    @Jeffreykum15 күн бұрын

    Yes let them try it.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    15 күн бұрын

    thanks for your comment

  • @flamboone9727
    @flamboone972717 күн бұрын

    Two engine wings could be redesigned to increase efficiency requiring less fuel/thrust during cruising operations.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    17 күн бұрын

    yep thanks for comment bro

  • @howardtenenbaum3537
    @howardtenenbaum353719 күн бұрын

    As impressive as the A380 is, I still have great feelings of respect and nostalgia for the Queen of the Skies!

  • @Europeanfriends

    @Europeanfriends

    19 күн бұрын

    @@howardtenenbaum3537 flew recently to Hong Kong on the A380. Where the 747 is the queen of the skies, the A380 with its low noise levels and stability is a House in the sky. Fantastic airplane, rocksteady

  • @royhi1809
    @royhi180919 күн бұрын

    Why not. What do they have to lose?

  • @Recoverlerbotines
    @Recoverlerbotines18 күн бұрын

    GUYS SHUT UP WITH THE HATE OML I KNOW THIS IS PROPAGANDA BUT I ENJOY WATCHING IT ANYWAYS

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    18 күн бұрын

    ✈️✈️✈️thanks

  • @margarita8442
    @margarita844219 күн бұрын

    make a tri jet, they look good

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    yep thanks ✈️

  • @somnathchatterjee5081
    @somnathchatterjee508116 күн бұрын

    Boeing can try with 3 engines instead of proposed 2 engines.

  • @sengo2146

    @sengo2146

    16 күн бұрын

    2.5 engines

  • @peternichols7503
    @peternichols750319 күн бұрын

    Lucky Henry Ford didn’t have the same lack of ambition that Boeing seem to have!

  • @DAVIDGREGORYKERR
    @DAVIDGREGORYKERR19 күн бұрын

    RR Trent Engines.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    🛫

  • @zoldiur
    @zoldiur19 күн бұрын

    This is an excellent example of how to compress the LARGEST number of words into the SMALLEST thought... 🤣

  • @JanKowalski-vj9py
    @JanKowalski-vj9py19 күн бұрын

    This will be exactly the same disaster as in case of 737 MAX. Larger engines won't fit, they will be mounted higher so MCAS will be mounted on 747 leading to unevitable crash.

  • @antoniosoares2903

    @antoniosoares2903

    19 күн бұрын

    Are you a dumb guy?

  • @theelf152
    @theelf15219 күн бұрын

    I do not want to see a 2 engines 747 - there is absolutely No need for it. I'm all for bringing back an iconic plane if it's operationally and economically viable but then what's the problem with 4 modern smaller, yet same/more powerful and efficient engines instead. RR are redoing the B-52 engines and are basically fitting small commercial engines into a similar dual pods design to keep the planes structure and engineering exactly the same.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks for your feedback

  • @pierrew1532
    @pierrew153218 күн бұрын

    Probably quicker/easier to put a 747 hump and high sitting cockpit design on a 777 tbh 😂

  • @Recoverlerbotines

    @Recoverlerbotines

    18 күн бұрын

    😂😂😂

  • @Recoverlerbotines

    @Recoverlerbotines

    18 күн бұрын

    Just Photoshop that and look🤣🤣🤣

  • @Recoverlerbotines

    @Recoverlerbotines

    18 күн бұрын

    Looks so gay

  • @smeary10
    @smeary1019 күн бұрын

    Re-engining the 747 is the easy part. The problem with the jumbo now is that they're getting very old so the airframes are now coming to the end of their useful life, the avionics are old and there's only a handful of the last version, the 747-8. This is not going to happen in a million years.Boeing needs to concentrate on its 747 replacement, the 777-X. Not waste time fluffing about with unappealing and expensive upgrades that will make little to no difference in the long run.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    18 күн бұрын

    thanks for your comment

  • @ThomasCrowne
    @ThomasCrowne19 күн бұрын

    Boeing seven hundred and forty seven???? 4 or 5 engines???? Shmuck

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks for your feedback

  • @SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands
    @SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands19 күн бұрын

    Can I have a plane with wheels and doors please? Ah , and Airbus? Yes please...

  • @antoniosoares2903

    @antoniosoares2903

    19 күн бұрын

    Are you a dumb guy?

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    ✈️

  • @madusmaxamus8670
    @madusmaxamus867019 күн бұрын

    My fear is can Boeing of today build a 747 twin that will be as reliable as the 747 of yesterday? Boeing seems to be in a failure mode with their production of many things. Aircraft, space programs and other things seem to have problems that are insurmountable. I do not want to see something like this new 747 twin in the air till Boeing gets their head back on straight.

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks for sharing your thoughts

  • @ThindogRoryThomson
    @ThindogRoryThomson19 күн бұрын

    The following video was made 2 years ago I am so glad Boeing are finaly waking up... kzread.info/dash/bejne/paOCq7Gmg7nVe6Q.html

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks

  • @BrotherMichaeloftheCross
    @BrotherMichaeloftheCross19 күн бұрын

    Boeing has to get back to building a machine and away from profit. If they don't convince regulators, this may be dead on arrival.

  • @antoniosoares2903

    @antoniosoares2903

    19 күн бұрын

    Are you a dumb guy?

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks for your feedback

  • @JPB57
    @JPB5715 күн бұрын

    Fake news 😂

  • @Neeboopsh
    @Neeboopsh19 күн бұрын

    lol letting these new guys at boeing take a crack at the 747? here come the crashes and door plugs flying off, wheels being ejected or engine cowls blowing off in flight.

  • @antoniosoares2903

    @antoniosoares2903

    19 күн бұрын

    Are you a dumb guy?

  • @FLIGAVIA

    @FLIGAVIA

    19 күн бұрын

    thanks for your comment