After all of the reading I have done in an attempt to understand this, you managed to make it all click in 10 minutes. Thank you!

Perfect explanation! It is always important the way how you teach the complex subject to the audience. Thank you!

So clever ! Now I understand why it doesn't need a big noisy fan ! Thank you so much, very instructive !

@gendaminoru3195

2 жыл бұрын

depends on how much air you want to accelerate and to what velocity. They can be extremely noisy in propulsion applications. I am here to study what we can do to make them quieter while still getting the exit velocity and volume required.

Like all these others, I have studied this, but never understood it until now. The Entrainment and its multiplying effect is the little KEY detail that it seemed was always left out. Thank you!!!

Thank you very much for this explanation. I understood it nicely. And I really like the way you explained it. This has helped me lot!

Excellent, simple explanation. Well done!

Absolutely the best explanation I have seen. Great vid mate!

Keep it simple, you did and now I under the basics of blade/less fan propulsion. Thank you

You Sir are a True RESEARCH & KNOWLEGE DISTILLER. Thank you. Please continue your work.

Excellent info & video, easy to understand, very well done, TY!

This is an awesome and very informative explanation! Bravo!

Great explanation for the coanda effect... Thank you 👍👍

Excellent explanation. Best one I have seen!!

Didn't expected such a wonderful explanation Wow 🔥

You really are great at giving explanations congrats! Keep it up

Verry clever way of using the wind for thrust.I understood everything 🙂

enjoyed your description of the inner workings. thank you.

I have the basic understanding of aerodynamics and this video explains it perfectly. Thanks for sharing 👌👍

Well done. A clear explanation of a little understood principle.

Thank you for your time and teach !!!

Wow. This the best explanation for the bladeless fan. This will help to design my hobby project to make bladeless fan in 3d printer. I would enjoy more such videos

@cristiansandor4435

3 жыл бұрын

Hi, I'm curiouse have you build a 3D fan yet?

Very good explanation, I learned something new.

beautifully made video, with clear explanation. Thank you ever so much

Great Explanation, simple and clear, Thank you !

finally an explanation that i understand. thank you.

Thank you. Well explained

Now that was Very Interesting and Well Explained

very educational. thank you sir.

Thank you. Perfectly explained.

Great for using as an office desk fan and when you're watching TV or reading

Thank you sir for the wonderful explanation

Great Video, I understood every part! Thank you!

great job! thanks for sharing this information

Fabulous vide3o and explanations! Thank you.

Very nice explanation.

Even I can understand your explanation, thank you.

So good, thank you really much

wow, i think i got it now, or at least neart got it. great job explaining .. wow, i think i have and addition or two for this level of propulsion. thank

Great explanation , thx

very nice simple and clear thanks

Awesome, thank you.

Phenomenal , thanks

Good explanation!

Excellent explanation

I really enjoyed this video and its content.

Great work sir

Well explained. Thanks

Beautiful

It is like in jet engines, now I know how they have so much power thanks to you !

Very cool video. I myself just got a 3d printer and just started on CAD and for the very first project wanted to build a bladeless fan. I'm at v4 and checked out this video to see if I did everything right to find I am spot on. The only difference with my fan, which I haven't tested yet, was to move the air intake to the very back and am wondering if that could help air flow at all? All fans I have seen air is taken in from the bottom.

VERY NICE VEDIO, NICE EXPLAINATIO, NICE VOICE QUALITY.

Thank you SO MUCH!

Thank you for explaining. This is by far the best explanation I have seen so far. Does the entrained airflow help with lowering the low pressure area? making the unducted airflow stronger?

Very interesting video. The bladeless fan multiplies the air quantity flow. For it to work well with an aircraft the air must be accelerated at the exit and not increased in pressure. although it would work ok with a slower flying aircraft. It would be interesting to see a comparison with a conventional electric ducted fan (EDF) showing power consumption and thrust between both bladeless and conventional fans.

@stalin200000

Жыл бұрын

if you are idiot, everything is "interesting", especially SF movies kzread.info/dash/bejne/lodk0aimqriWZso.html

Thank you

Excellent ...

The air entrainment add-in CFM effect is minimal at best with this Dyson design!

Thank you.

Thank you ❤️

Thank you SO MUCH for not adding the silly "R" to the end of Coanda Effect! The first video I watched about this was from an English guy who said "Coander" 100 times, was excruciating! Don't get me started on the silly extra syllable injected into aluminum.

You're an awesome teacher on this subject....is there something like this that's used to super change an engine? I think I saw something like this somewhere and used for supercharging .

what is the name of this phenomenon for combining the coanda effect to create the 15x air pressure

Very clear explanation, thank you! Using this principle, I saw a thing called "Joptera" that uses electric "bladeless reactors". I understand that between the primary air flow (from the column), the inducted air and the entrained air. However, I wonder how efficient the system is in terms of energy, as they (Joptera) claim a huge reduction in power consumption. Thus, for a same 1kW electricity consumed by a motor, how can I compare the thrust/power output between, say, a ducted fan and a bladeless fan (I suspect the size may need adjusting)? My suspicion is they're losing a lot of power in friction and the inducted+entrained air is proportional to the force/airspeed and the viscosity of the blown fluid but I'm not sure how to formulate the hypothesis (it probably has something to do with the laws of thermodynamics and the conservation of energy, I guess). Also, in the case of a wing, would it make sense (e.g. to reduce/deflect drag) to put blowing fins just behind the camber towards the trailing edge?

@cristiansandor4435

3 жыл бұрын

Hi, your comment is sound. I also have doubts about the real efficiency on Jetoptera. Anyway if you wish to compare thrust of any kind of two types of fans you can simply alow the fan to pull on a weighing scale. This is a kind of static thrust measurement.

@mrgreyman3358

2 жыл бұрын

I came here because of that video myself bro.

@johna.s.3847

Жыл бұрын

I think for now the bladeless fan is ok for ventilation where air multiplication is desired. Not so good for an aircraft where accelerated air at a lower pressure is needed, and not to mention the power consumption, complexity and weight. Everything has a price. When something is gained there is always a loss. Very interesting video.

Makes a nice fan, just seems that the only gain in actual propulsive force is the inducted air from the intake side. The entrained air on the exhaust side does nothing for thrust? Will need to see more

very good

What about the constant back pressure the compression fan has to fight to maintain and create, would that require a constant high amperage demand from the power supply? Wouldn't this be a major problem to overcome when trying to implement this into aircraft when weight is a major factor for battery system needed for sufficient flight time?

Thanks

? The entrained air is past the a/c so how does that help with propulsion or lift? Does it cause more to be inducted?

thank you. could one be designed than run from the convection off a tea light? i built one from tin cans and ran it on ethanol for some interesting results.

Thank you... :)

Yea I get that the flow from the gap generates more flow from the surrounding. But what really matters is how much flow you can get per unit energy, and whether it’s better than a normal fan.

@t_c5266

Жыл бұрын

I have been looking for tests like this. Have you seen any that make this comparison?

@chengong388

Жыл бұрын

@@t_c5266 no, but the fact that there's no airplanes doing this, tells me it isn't more efficient.

@1islam1

Жыл бұрын

@@t_c5266 🔴 What Is Islam? 🔴 Islam is not just another religion. 🔵 It is the same message preached by Moses, Jesus and Abraham. 🔴 Islam literally means ‘submission to God’ and it teaches us to have a direct relationship with God. 🔵 It reminds us that since God created us, no one should be worshipped except God alone. 🔴 It also teaches that God is nothing like a human being or like anything that we can imagine. 🌍 The concept of God is summarized in the Quran as: 📖 { “Say, He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He does not give birth, nor was He born, and there is nothing like Him.”} (Quran 112:1-4) 📚 🔴 Becoming a Muslim is not turning your back to Jesus. 🔵 Rather it’s going back to the original teachings of Jesus and obeying him. More ....

@t_c5266

Жыл бұрын

@@1islam1 it's the religion of terror

@warwickrobinson7086

7 ай бұрын

Or another way to look at it is that air multipliers are monumentally more expensive than regular fans... a full A.M fan may be able to move 15x more air than the internal fan which runs it, but if it costs $500 can it produce 10x the breeze that a $50 fan does? Not so sure...

Lo ví traducido al español Te agradezco haberme explicado dónde está el truco, al parecer éste tipo de turbina o complemento de turbina promete mucho para las aerolíneas, que sus aviones son de motores de rotores coaxiales osea el rotor del turbo reactor está por fuera y el rotor de los ventiladores enormes que vemos dentro de las cáscaras están por dentro del turbo reactor, y demasiado texto ya muchos se la saben pero algunos quienes me lean no entenderían… pero quienes entiendan ésto promete mucho reemplazando por completo esos ventiladores pesados y esos enormes cascarones osados por unos más funcionales y también reemplazando los turbo reactores por unos más pequeños ó por motores así como del que llevan en la cola del avión que no me acuerdo cómo se llama

do you think this design could be reverse teched and become a bladeless wind turbine?

This airflow induction, entrainment, produces 15x's times could be recycle into another air hoop with 15x's the power, to produce another inducement, and entrainment and so on, the possibilities are great I imagine this could be a multiplier of air force.

@cristiansandor4435

3 жыл бұрын

Do you know why this system is not used in aircraft propulsion yet?

What altitude ceiling do you think this technology might reach the? stratosphere?

If this structure were outside and swiveled towards the wind, could the lower mount fan plus inducted air and also the entrained air produce enough energy so that a ducted air generator makes more electricity than the mount fan? Thinking of this as a small to medium device. Home or RV solutions. I'm thinking about the camping angle. Too much is about solar panels but hybrid electrical input should equalize weather changes and power needs.

Shouldn’t the surface of the exit air be curved like a typical airfoil to increase lift?

Nice!

This design seems to highlight Induction and Entrainment in a circular wing in order to produce more thrust. I would think higher lift on a straight wing would benefit from the Colanda Effect rather than circular wing, A circular wing's lift would have the increased lift, if there is any, cancel each other out from opposing directions of the circle. Lift from the top part of the circular wing would cancel the lift from the bottom part of the circular wing. Side lift forces would be lost energy. A higher flow from the slot at the top of a fixed wing would increase the Colanda Effect lift. IMHO minimizing the drag forces inside the wing from the forced air flow as it's directed out the slot at the top would be the major problem to be solved.

Are they using compressed air to start it up or injecting fuel like a jet engine for added thrust?

can this method be used in an airplane wing?

i saw jetoptera and fell in love

Greetings ladies and gentlemen of this comment section. As a formula student racing car enthusiast. I was wondering if a blade less fan can effectively suck more air than a bladed fan ? We intend to use a fan on our upcoming competition car, but we’re not too sure whether the blade less far will work as well as a bladed fan. Thank you in advance

Could that idea be extended to water to say, propel a boat?

Perhaps an aircraft wing, which is more flat on the bottom and curved on top would aid understanding.

Verry well done! I was looking to do some tests for a RC plane propulsion system but after some reading it seems this system doesn't have so much potential for propulsion systems... It may be ok for a nice cooling fan in house but not for generating efficient thrust for a plane. Not sure anyone did any tests on RC?

@mumaac

3 жыл бұрын

jetoptera?

@cristiansandor4435

3 жыл бұрын

​ @Ranmacar Something like that. I'm not sure small Reynolds numbers will be advantage or disadvantage? Also not sure iduction how far from the surface is effective. This needs tests. And I'm thinking, for ease of build it will not be build circular (like a ring ) but linear like a biplane but the surfaces closer. That's the basic plan.

Is it possible to run fan in reverse and make it act as vacuum cleaner?

So would you say a "bladless" fan puts out air better that a normal one?

Is it possible to make such fan in large size? say square share 4x4 feet?

Actually it is not Inducted but rather Induced Inducted applies to a person being installed into an organization or function, while induced is to be lead by persuasion, compelled or influenced (like magnetic fields) Technically correct, the best kind of correct :P

So if you were building a bladeless airplane; Can you take a turbine engine, direct it towards an air foil then to a hollow air foil, will it be multiplied 30x instead of 15x?

This explanation is very good, thank you ! However, it needs some time to REALLY get it. Allthough the physic and mathematic is shown the mental image stays quite difficult.

@Slowly_Going_Mad

3 жыл бұрын

I have been wondering about a "bladeless drone" and have seen plenty of hypothetical designs but very few working prototypes using the same principles. Also such a drone could actually be made totally bladeless if it used a monopropellant like HTP. There are however lift assisted aircraft using similar concepts but none use a circular duct that I've seen.

so is this more efficient than a bladed fan..yes or no.. does it move more air per kw of power..yes or no

@Thomas_AAnderson

3 жыл бұрын

Maybe efficient (but the horizontal fan have a smaller diameter than a bladed fan), but not cost effective. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lodk0aimqriWZso.html

@anthis127

3 жыл бұрын

The basic concept of conservation of energy tells me that a traditional fan should be a lot more efficient because all the electric power is used to move the air without wasting any energy in the form of friction in the convoluted air path of the "bladeless" fan. I hope Dyson use better bearings/motors to compensate this lack of efficiency, but if you threw the same amount of money at a traditional fan, you'd get better efficiency

@kreynolds1123

2 жыл бұрын

@@anthis127 convolution in the path surely adds some resistance, but I suspect here it's lower than your expecting.

@over2seeyer

Жыл бұрын

my instinct says no, this requires compressed air to work and compressing air is a highly inefficient thing to do as allot of energy is wasted in heat

Why not show the flow using some enhancement, lasers with particulates, for example. Can you see the “tunnel” of low pressure or is it just too busy with the entrainment happening.

If it works In air, can I assume It will work in water? Basically a ram jet? Anybody ? Got any thoughts on that or how about applying it to a vertical windmill

What you get in volume, you lose in speed, right ? It's a cool mechanism though

Maybe,self propelled wind turbine blades , then you can combian centrificail force also

Your explanation was great. Now the big question is why isn't it being used in commercial aircraft if it has any advantage over standard airfoil designs? My guess is there is no advantage over any commercial design.

@wesbaumguardner8829

2 жыл бұрын

You may want to check out this video. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lISOq5iRn6vPYZM.html

@hifinsword

2 жыл бұрын

@@wesbaumguardner8829 I don't think the tests done so far use this system. All of the videos of the a/c inflight show the EDF, not the bladeless system. The BL system looks cool and probably cost a lot more. But unless it gets much better with thrust, it won't be used on full size a/c.

@wesbaumguardner8829

2 жыл бұрын

@@hifinsword You are correct. They are pretty sneaky.

@hifinsword

2 жыл бұрын

@@wesbaumguardner8829 I am a fairly new RC plane modeler. So far I've only built 2 aircraft from scratch. After watching that video and a few others, I'm wondering if I invert the cross section design so that the airflow goes to the top of the airfoil, it would give the wing better boundary layer control and improve the lift along the entire wing. Building such a plane would be time intensive. And I have a 6th gen fighter or SST model I want to build first. But this does interest me to see if a high lift, yet fast a/c can be built using a modification of this idea. Here's my pusher prop build of the XB-70. kzread.info/dash/bejne/aKOitLpwpMu0YLg.html and my SR-71 build. kzread.info/dash/bejne/goic1bVumbvdnqw.html

@wesbaumguardner8829

2 жыл бұрын

@@hifinsword I think the increased airflow over the top of the wing will increase both lift and drag, but I am no engineer and have never built anything. I am curious as to what would happen if a Tesla turbine was used to create the airflow instead of an impeller.

So if that be the case then, if I create a larger more powerful fan with better airflow INTO the tube - this would result in an even greater effect? - if this is the case, then I have a further suggestion based on physics. If the vertical tube starts off at say 250 mm - and the TOP of the tube is reduced to say 200 mm......this would mean that the air is being compressed just before it enters the chamber....resulting in an eve GREATER amount of low pressure and entrained air ( vortices ). thus with the calculation of 15x the increase in total air volume, the fan should become very powerful. More powerful than it would be if the up-lift tube were the same diameter at both ends - correct? because essentially, this is how a jet turbine works.

@juststeve7665

2 жыл бұрын

see Jetoptera

Flow rate increase by a factor of 15. Impressive. But this means the inductor flow propeller must provide all the power necessary for this big flow, while only acting on its own little flow. How is this power transfer computed? It doesn't click in.