Black Holes, Symmetries and Impossible Triangles - In Conversation with Roger Penrose

Ғылым және технология

Sir Roger Penrose is a mathematical physicist and Nobel Laureate whose work spans impossible triangles and tilings that bear his name to the mathematical underpinnings of black holes.
Watch the Q&A: • Q&A: Black Holes, Symm...
Sir Roger Penrose Kt OM FRS is Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor at Oxford. He won the Nobel Prize in Physics and the Wolf Prize in Physics and was appointed to the Order of Merit. His work spans general relativity, black holes, cosmology, tiling theory and the theory of mind.
Thomas Fink is the founding Director of the London Institute and Charge de Recherche in the French CNRS. He studied physics at Caltech, Cambridge and École Normale Supérieure. His work includes statistical physics, combinatorics and the mathematics of evolvable systems.
Yang-Hui He is a Fellow at the London Institute, Professor at City University, Chang-Jiang Chair at NanKai University and Lecturer at Merton College, Oxford. He studied at Princeton, Cambridge and MIT and works at the interface of string theory, geometry and machine learning.
This event was hosted in partnership with the London Institute for Mathematical Sciences - lims.ac.uk/
---
A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:
Supalak Foong, efkinel lo, Abdelkhalek Ayad, Martin Paull, Ben Wynne-Simmons, Ivo Danihelka, Hamza, Paulina Barren, Kevin Winoto, Jonathan Killin, János Fekete, Mehdi Razavi, Mark Barden, Taylor Hornby, Rasiel Suarez, Stephan Giersche, William 'Billy' Robillard, Scott Edwardsen, Jeffrey Schweitzer, Gou Ranon, Christina Baum, Frances Dunne, jonas.app, Tim Karr, Adam Leos, Michelle J. Zamarron, Fairleigh McGill, Alan Latteri, David Crowner, Matt Townsend, Anonymous, Robert Reinecke, Paul Brown, Lasse T. Stendan, David Schick, Joe Godenzi, Dave Ostler, Osian Gwyn Williams, David Lindo, Roger Baker, Greg Nagel, and Rebecca Pan.
---
Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
The Ri is on Patreon: / theroyalinstitution
and Twitter: / ri_science
and Facebook: / royalinstitution
and Tumblr: / ri-science
Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/home/editorial-po...
Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsletter
Product links on this page may be affiliate links which means it won't cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.

Пікірлер: 396

  • @mehridin
    @mehridin2 жыл бұрын

    I see Penrose, I click. This guy is a relief and a beacon of sanity and common sense in the popular science community.

  • @Robinson8491

    @Robinson8491

    2 жыл бұрын

    Let's make that the science community

  • @godfreypigott

    @godfreypigott

    2 жыл бұрын

    The only insanity is in the anti-science climate change denial community.

  • @fits4390

    @fits4390

    2 жыл бұрын

    I completely agree. He is so ready and happy to admit his own errors and his admiration of others’ cleverness. He displays humility way better than most others in his field.

  • @godfreypigott

    @godfreypigott

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@fits4390 Is your middle name "Sky"?

  • @theultimatereductionist7592

    @theultimatereductionist7592

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@godfreypigott Agreed!

  • @RyanK-100
    @RyanK-1002 жыл бұрын

    Thank you to the interviewers for not cutting him off every 30 seconds like interviews on the major TV networks.

  • @tomditto3972

    @tomditto3972

    2 жыл бұрын

    They stupidly did not put a floor monitor down so he could see what was being discussed, and this is not the first time this mistake was made in this setting with this speaker.

  • @rakinbinraihan

    @rakinbinraihan

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hi Ryan Kolar! where are you studying?

  • @jmanj3917
    @jmanj39172 жыл бұрын

    *Of all of Sir Roger's traits I find it the most endearing how he readily, even happily, admits to when, where and how he has been wrong. What a true genius!*

  • @yanair2091

    @yanair2091

    2 жыл бұрын

    I don't understand this. Why would he be happily wrong?

  • @peezieforestem5078

    @peezieforestem5078

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@yanair2091 Because it means he has learned something new.

  • @Intermernet

    @Intermernet

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@yanair2091 Real science is about disproving ideas, not proving them. If an idea is shown to be wrong, it's time to start looking for what's right. The best (and I would say the only) scientists are those who will admit when they were wrong in the face of overwhelming evidence (either theoretical, practical or both). This is currently being played out with quantum physics and relativistic physics. Both have been shown through observation to be the most accurate theories we've ever come up with. They can both be experimentally verified to a ludicrous degree of accuracy. Unfortunately, they disagree with each-other. Therefore, there's a mistake with one or both of the theories. Physicists understand this, and most modern physics research is aimed at trying to isolate this discrepancy.

  • @042Ghostmaker

    @042Ghostmaker

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Intermernet perhaps Geometric Unity is the answer

  • @lieuwestraatman3732

    @lieuwestraatman3732

    Жыл бұрын

    @@yanair2091 maybe he is happy he can keep himself humble

  • @bokchoiman
    @bokchoiman2 жыл бұрын

    Roger's ceaseless curiosity is inspirational. Even at 90, he's on the frontier of physics and hungry for more knowledge. Thank you Sir for your work.

  • @treatb09

    @treatb09

    2 жыл бұрын

    Since when is he 90

  • @infiltratious8195

    @infiltratious8195

    5 ай бұрын

    ​@@treatb09since he turned 90...?

  • @soultrick7474
    @soultrick74742 жыл бұрын

    Finally, dude gets standing applause, recognition and respect that he deserve years ago. Glad to see that, better late than never.

  • @krotenschemel8558
    @krotenschemel85582 жыл бұрын

    Last year I saw Penrose in the news. One of those articles about him. My immediate reaction: "Oh no, they posted his obituary" so I deaded reading the rest of the news. Yet I did only to find out, that he just go a nobel prize. Quite a relief.

  • @seancharles1595

    @seancharles1595

    2 жыл бұрын

    Me too! I actually emailed his office with congratulations when I realised :)

  • @jbrownjetmech-4783
    @jbrownjetmech-47832 жыл бұрын

    Sir Penrose speaking out a lifetime of study in only a few minutes. Magnificent.

  • @billTO

    @billTO

    2 жыл бұрын

    Sir Roger, please. With Sir or Dame (knighthood), you use either first name (Sir Roger) or both names (Sir Roger Penrose) but never with only the family name.

  • @jonathanjollimore4794

    @jonathanjollimore4794

    2 жыл бұрын

    It's no good having ideas if you can't explain them to anybody in a way people can understand

  • @5SMA
    @5SMA2 жыл бұрын

    I don't understand so much of what he says but it is still a bliss listening to him. Any crumbs that do get through my thick skull are gold!

  • @patemblen3644
    @patemblen36442 жыл бұрын

    Such an amazing man. The mind he has at his age is incredible. His form of thinking is just a step beyond. And he's so personable to boot!

  • @theultimatereductionist7592

    @theultimatereductionist7592

    2 жыл бұрын

    Dr Lawrence Krauss, Thunderf00t, every single worker at the IPCC has an incredible mind, and sacrifices themselves for our country, our world.

  • @bendavis2234
    @bendavis22342 жыл бұрын

    I just finished reading one of his books “Cycles of Time” and it covers his fascinating view on cosmology in detail. It was more challenging than any other layman books that I’ve read, but that made it even more fulfilling IMO. Penrose doesn’t shy away from equations and succeeds in keeping the book interesting and readable. Shout out to him for being such an inspiration to the scientific community!

  • @A_Casual_NPC

    @A_Casual_NPC

    2 жыл бұрын

    Man, I had actually been looking at getting that book for myself. Was kinda on the fence, since I find scientific literature often too hard to read, as English isn't my native language. This talk (and your comment) made me sure to want to read it, hopping onto amazon after this. watching the rest of the talk first.

  • @bendavis2234

    @bendavis2234

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@A_Casual_NPC Yeah you should definitely read it. He uses a lot of diagrams and pictures so it is really good for visual learners. Especially if you don't like incredibly 'wordy' books I'd say this one is for you. I'm reading his other book 'Road To Reality' right now, and that one goes through the equations and math of physics a little more compared to his other books. They're all good though

  • @zooperstar1996

    @zooperstar1996

    3 ай бұрын

    😅 op 15:05 i😅😊

  • @edwardlee2794
    @edwardlee27942 жыл бұрын

    A very well respected English scientists of classical caliber. Contributed so much to the understanding of the universe, stripping the underpants off the corners where sun don't shine. Wishing you health and all the best professor Roger. Thanks for all line up and keep up with the good work. From Hker worldwide

  • @kelly4187
    @kelly41872 жыл бұрын

    I love the shout-out for Birkbeck College, University of London :) Such a fantastic organisation with the goal of educating people beyond the traditional undergraduate age, who have families and careers to manage. Not many know that Birkbeck has such an esteemed list of alumni and colleagues.

  • @user-wu8yq1rb9t
    @user-wu8yq1rb9t2 жыл бұрын

    Wow ..... *Professor Roger Penrose* is here .... This program is just GREAT I'm sure! Thank you so much dear *Ri*

  • @alexeyshaposhnikov5770
    @alexeyshaposhnikov57702 жыл бұрын

    Outstanding mind. He has rare ability to have a fresh look at complicated things. Love to listening him

  • @Carfeu
    @Carfeu2 жыл бұрын

    Sir Roger is a gem, so good to see him talk and just effortlessly show his genius

  • @vatsalyavaibhavsrivastava2671
    @vatsalyavaibhavsrivastava26712 жыл бұрын

    Always a delight to listen to him!

  • @eskileriksson4457
    @eskileriksson44572 жыл бұрын

    In Sweden, we skipped all titles in the sixties, except for the royal family. Makes social interactions so much easier. But this man I would definitely address as Sir! So smart, well spoken, and a real joy to listen to.

  • @luminousfractal420

    @luminousfractal420

    2 жыл бұрын

    i moved to the usa a decade ago and still cant bring myself to use the terms sir or maam for a government worker, i absolutely hold it in reserve for the likes of gentleman like this. a good man worthy of a little admiration.

  • @eskileriksson4457

    @eskileriksson4457

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@luminousfractal420 Yeah, a social contract that depend on fake respect is unhealthy, in my view.

  • @Robocop-qe7le
    @Robocop-qe7le2 жыл бұрын

    Such a clear, razor sharp mind.

  • @stylis666
    @stylis6662 жыл бұрын

    This is so wonderful! Such a lovely interview with one of the greatest minds of our time. And I had no idea that the triangle was actually sir Penrose's idea. I thought it was all Escher. I remember drawing it over and over in highschool during math and science classes. Little did I know XD I played Diablo II for over 25 years now and the Arcane Sanctuary has versions of the perpetual staircase in it. My father had a book of Escher's. Well... in theory. In practice it was mine. I had never liked books much unless they were dictionaries or encyclopedias so when my dad put the book away I took it and put it with the dictionaries and encyclopedias and declared the case as my sacred shrine where I had my books I loved. And it may seem insignificant, but I never got to finish college or go to a university and I have a deep admiration not just for sir Penrose but for all physicists, mathematicians, and what have you. I love seeing and hearing them all do what I cannot and only once hoped of being a part of. For me the triangle was a symbol for my love for learning and beauty and now knowing it came not from the Dutch artist I adore, but from the great Penrose, inspired by Escher, I feel vindicated in my love for physics, Escher's and Penrose's drawings, and just fun stuff in general. Thanks to my brother, who did become a scientist, in chemistry, I do know some science nerds like my father, my brother, and myself, and if there's one thing I've learned about scientists, it's that they all seem to have this deep rooted enjoyment in life. I've met people from all walks of life and most people just live their lives and only few actually experience and enjoy it. With scientists I've never met one that didn't thoroughly enjoy experiencing life. Thank you, sir Penrose, for being such an amazing gentleman. And I should phone my brother. It's been a while since I've seen him, weeks if not months and I miss him.

  • @0.618-0
    @0.618-02 жыл бұрын

    Thankyou RI channel for bringing Sir Roger into my world. I am blessed to have watched Sir Roger tell us about his journey with mathematics to unravel the secrets of nature and what we are within it. What a brilliant mind.

  • @johnbuyers8095
    @johnbuyers80952 жыл бұрын

    Absolute proof that following only one course of subject will end in being wrong. Opening yourself to multiple subjects, wether mathematics, physics or art give you a much more developed sense of seeing the complete answer. (Or as complete as we can so far manage, we need more scientists like this)

  • @helmutzollner5496
    @helmutzollner5496 Жыл бұрын

    This is a great interview. Thank you for sharing.

  • @Robinson8491
    @Robinson84912 жыл бұрын

    Great talk. Happy about the focus on his tiling and Escher, where basically his genius started...and inspired others with it

  • @cinemaipswich4636
    @cinemaipswich46365 ай бұрын

    I am so glad to see Sir Rodger Penrose in this recent time. It has been a long time since we have seen him in the public space. I wait to hear the great man.

  • @michaelogden5958
    @michaelogden59582 жыл бұрын

    I have a print of Escher's "Relativity" in my den. I always liked it, but decided to purchase the print because it was a metaphor of where I was working at the time. Everyone apparently going somewhere, but extremely unlikely to ever merge into a coherent group. :-) This video is one of my favorite RI videos to date. Sir Roger is an international treasure.

  • @BakingScienceTraveller
    @BakingScienceTraveller2 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for uploading! He is such a brilliant mind! Best wishes from Germany, Becky

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas34772 жыл бұрын

    Roger is on a different level, Very few can grasp his intellect.

  • @EarlLedden

    @EarlLedden

    2 жыл бұрын

    So you are one of the very few that can grasp his intellect?

  • @eskileriksson4457

    @eskileriksson4457

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@EarlLedden :)

  • @teryarty177

    @teryarty177

    Жыл бұрын

    @@EarlLedden I'm one of the many that think they can, to some extent.

  • @riodasperolas
    @riodasperolas2 жыл бұрын

    Congratulations for having Roger Penrose tonight and giving RI subscribers the opportunity to enjoy his memories which are live History of Science.

  • @stevebarnes3108
    @stevebarnes31083 ай бұрын

    Wonderful insights and discussion, excellent watch, Thank you

  • @photographyandthecreativeyou
    @photographyandthecreativeyou2 жыл бұрын

    This was fabulous. Thank you!

  • @Odin412z
    @Odin412z2 жыл бұрын

    I love hearing from the great Sir Roger Penrose. He's a breath of fresh air in the world of physics and science in general. My only complaint is that the video was too short! How about creating three one-hour videos - one for each of the topics?

  • @apareek96

    @apareek96

    2 жыл бұрын

    Check his podcast with Joe Rogan or lex fridman.

  • @jameswyke8005
    @jameswyke8005 Жыл бұрын

    Incredible! Such a joy to listen.

  • @markberman6708
    @markberman67084 ай бұрын

    It's fascinating to hear Dr Penrose talk about 'coherence'... on and off for years I have been working on a book that describes the universe as being ordered by: chaos, simplicity, synchronicity, and is 'held' together by coherence... held together can be interpreted many ways.. but fundamentally it is a means of communication that also acts as a bond.

  • @nicklezetc
    @nicklezetc2 жыл бұрын

    yess!!! Finally back online!

  • @joshuamarais1481
    @joshuamarais14812 жыл бұрын

    "for those of you who don't know who Roger Penrose is, Martin has pointed out where the exits are""

  • @pavangaonkardonigadde
    @pavangaonkardonigadde2 жыл бұрын

    This is amazing thank you!

  • @MadderMel
    @MadderMel2 жыл бұрын

    Uncle Roger ! I was searching for something interesting to watch while having my supper ! I've found it right here !

  • @mikeisaacs335
    @mikeisaacs3352 жыл бұрын

    Wonderfully interesting!..Wish there was more time for the various topics but particularly towards the end on Schrodinger's equation/cat/ collapse of wave function, relation to consciousness, and the need for more than algorithms to enable us understand things..

  • @kagannasuhbeyoglu
    @kagannasuhbeyoglu2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you very much The Ri for sharing this "Giant Man" Great content 👍👏

  • @jeffreyhampton9130
    @jeffreyhampton91302 жыл бұрын

    I missed my dentist appointment. I couldn’t tear myself away.

  • @ej2863
    @ej28632 жыл бұрын

    More Penrose Plz! Longer, do a Penrose series. Thx

  • @dylansutton8898
    @dylansutton88982 жыл бұрын

    As a layperson that is always searching for more information, I find this completely fascinating.

  • @VerifyTheTruth
    @VerifyTheTruth2 жыл бұрын

    Thank You Mr. Penrose.

  • @utee72
    @utee72 Жыл бұрын

    Absolutely fascinating!!!!!!!

  • @peterchindove7146
    @peterchindove7146 Жыл бұрын

    That statement about 'understanding the objective' is profound. Because creativity does not necessarily follow an objective! I think that that was Sir RP's point.

  • @peterchindove7146
    @peterchindove71462 жыл бұрын

    The 'Road To Reality' is a modern classic and l hope will be available to all for many years to come. An excellent classic!

  • @rossg9361
    @rossg93612 жыл бұрын

    The sharpest 90 year old I’ve ever heard.

  • @JarredDavidson
    @JarredDavidson2 жыл бұрын

    He is 90! The clarity of mind with which he speaks astonishes my foggy 39 yo mind!

  • @IlicSorrentino
    @IlicSorrentino Жыл бұрын

    A timeless beatiful mind...!

  • @DiowE
    @DiowE2 жыл бұрын

    My favourite part from the lecture :- Proof procedures can only give you solutions but it cannot give you proofs of those solution. Only consciousness can provide proof of any solution. Consciousness > Computation.

  • @kartikeyyadav7259

    @kartikeyyadav7259

    2 жыл бұрын

    bro..same thoughts.

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla87112 жыл бұрын

    No wonder Penrose is full of praise of Alhambra, that held 400,000 books in the library that were translated and enlightened Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Fermat, Descartes, Leibniz,, Newton, Euler and many more, Penrose is only celebrating this great gift, along with the tiling, the work of Persian mathematicians. Penrose's biggest contribution is his conviction that 'mathematics is based on faith'. He deserve the Fields and a Nobel.

  • @isuruutube
    @isuruutube Жыл бұрын

    The epitome of humbleness in the whole scientific community!

  • @vblaas246
    @vblaas2462 жыл бұрын

    Loved the PBS Space Time Spinors and the Numberphile 3 gear axle. Seemingly impossible, yet possible.

  • @megamillionfreak

    @megamillionfreak

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@whirledpeas3477 Blah blah blah sHe3pLe blah blah blah.

  • @howardfernandes2657
    @howardfernandes2657 Жыл бұрын

    This man is eminently listenable to.

  • @helenbostock2350
    @helenbostock23502 жыл бұрын

    Well done for media work

  • @andreylebedenko1260
    @andreylebedenko12602 жыл бұрын

    The more I think about the double-slit experiment, the more it appears to me that paradoxes it creates can be solved by introducing pure information as an outcome of it. So we are not registering physical properties, but information about them. And what we see as paradoxes, are properties of pure information itself.

  • @luminousfractal420

    @luminousfractal420

    2 жыл бұрын

    it seems it is a misconception being pointed out, not a solution or a question. as mr. penrose suggested. theres a german lady who makes youtube physics vids and she helped clear that in my mind prior to roger saying it here. ive gone years missing the point entirely 😅

  • @das_it_mane

    @das_it_mane

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@luminousfractal420 Sabine Hossenfelder is her name

  • @rangerlinford7417
    @rangerlinford74172 жыл бұрын

    "If you dont know who he is, please leave quietly " what if I wanna learn?

  • @WebHackmd

    @WebHackmd

    2 жыл бұрын

    You're not so smart to get a simple joke, why would you think that you can learn something profound about reality?

  • @Plataani

    @Plataani

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@WebHackmd Why so touchy 🙁

  • @teryarty177

    @teryarty177

    Жыл бұрын

    Well, just ignore him, and stay.

  • @kris2k
    @kris2k Жыл бұрын

    thank you, the best thing - think on the internet

  • @seancharles1595
    @seancharles15952 жыл бұрын

    I just hope against hope that he has an army of students to carry on his work.

  • @Peter_Telling
    @Peter_Telling3 ай бұрын

    Thanks!

  • @charliekim2939
    @charliekim29392 жыл бұрын

    I have "The Road to Reality" on the left side of my favorite chair. For years (a decade?), now. After skimming through once, I had determined most of it is beyond me, and gave up reading it cover to cover. These days I read it like it is a book of wisdom or of that sort. I open a random page and read a few pages util I get a dose of intellectual stimulation. And, forget what I've just read. Same, next time. I hope that those bits and pieces are not forgotten but flushed away (from cache) to RAM or HDD portion of my brain. One day I might try reading it cover to cover. I hope that my CPU could put those randomly accumulated pieces in order for me to understand the road to reality better.

  • @ggc7318
    @ggc73182 жыл бұрын

    Amazing 👏

  • @andrelagerburg7817
    @andrelagerburg78172 жыл бұрын

    It's a delight to listen to Penrose. BTW, watch how the interviewers are drinking water all the time and Penrose is only talking.

  • @7grhpsyfuck272
    @7grhpsyfuck272 Жыл бұрын

    he really got the field no bell prize 3 years in a row. hes in his 70's

  • @infinity3119
    @infinity31196 ай бұрын

    Chalk addiction, brought to light by Einstein level scientists! Love this !

  • @gennas
    @gennas2 жыл бұрын

    Now I understand why Lee Smolin talks about Penrose that way

  • @douglaswilliams4389
    @douglaswilliams43892 жыл бұрын

    Chalk to board this... A bicycle aluminum wheel 12 pistons 12 accordion style airbags 12 weightlifter weight caps The airbags are all half-full of capacity The pistons allows fully open on one side and fully closed on the opposite side of the wheel. Synchronized movement. Put it on an Axl mount under water and what have you done ?

  • @JC-zw9vs
    @JC-zw9vs2 жыл бұрын

    Yang-Hui is really excited to be there talking to Roger, as I would be!

  • @TD05SSLegacy
    @TD05SSLegacy2 жыл бұрын

    National Treasure… World Treasure

  • @VideographerExperience
    @VideographerExperience2 жыл бұрын

    I loved the *Altair IV* colouing book.

  • @larryhernandez769
    @larryhernandez769 Жыл бұрын

    Sir Roger Penrose : Absolutely Interesting 🤔

  • @SpotterVideo
    @SpotterVideo2 жыл бұрын

    Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons. Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.

  • @7infernalphoenix
    @7infernalphoenix2 жыл бұрын

    People don't usually mind getting up in the morning for a Nobel prize - slight understatement

  • @cvdevol
    @cvdevol2 жыл бұрын

    One of the few open-minded, non-ideological people in the hard sciences. Refreshing.

  • @SamVekemans
    @SamVekemans2 жыл бұрын

    What date was this recorded? Please edit the video description. Thanks!

  • @wktodd
    @wktodd2 жыл бұрын

    Find time for this man!

  • @koonigallery2107
    @koonigallery2107Ай бұрын

    If a photon behaves as a wave and is pure energy, how can it travel in a wave 🌊 without having additional force or loosing some energy? Because the up down movement must take some force even if it doesn't have mass. Are the spacial/gravitational fields sandwiching the photons along there trajectories? Also If you do the double split experiment 100 times, do all the particles always get detected in the exact same places, or are they randomly detected? Thanks

  • @chew76
    @chew762 жыл бұрын

    I would have like the chance to see the q&a at the end

  • @kazimierzmarkiel5400
    @kazimierzmarkiel54002 жыл бұрын

    Are the photos of black holes indicating of any flattening of the poles and increasing the equatorial radius? Due to rotation of the matter on entering the black hole- which shall cause the existence of centrifugal force inside. Stary

  • @joeimbesi99
    @joeimbesi998 ай бұрын

    Penrose is my Science Hero

  • @243david7
    @243david72 жыл бұрын

    The amazing thing is that he's 90 but probably wouldn't think of retiring. not when the brain is still continually looking for new connexions, exercising that grey matter seems to be the secret, or maybe it's the microtubules

  • @gmshadowtraders
    @gmshadowtraders Жыл бұрын

    Happy birthday bro!

  • @shahriar1159
    @shahriar11592 жыл бұрын

    What a wonderful mind

  • @waldwassermann
    @waldwassermann Жыл бұрын

    "It all comes down to companionship more commonly known as love. It is this the reason why. Now we in the field of science can continue to talk endlessly around this truth and speak half truths, or, we can speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth which is that the purpose of self otherwise known as the meaning of life is love." - Wald Wassermann, Physicist, Center of Theoretical Physics.

  • @fellsmoke
    @fellsmoke2 жыл бұрын

    The universe is full of unspoken knowledge. No doubt unspeakable knowledge, concepts beyond the limits of human grasp. Also is the knowledge which can be revealed via understanding such as the double helix of DNA and stored knowledge.

  • @user-qq3bl6py3g
    @user-qq3bl6py3g7 ай бұрын

    It’s the most accurate language we have but like any language you have to get the translation right and good writing.

  • @rhoddryice5412
    @rhoddryice54122 жыл бұрын

    Which date was this? Nothing in the description.Was it before COVID?

  • @perlindholm4129
    @perlindholm41292 жыл бұрын

    My Idea - Gravity as an impossible triangle. Take the triangle inequality c < a+b then add a function to the distance c to the object and miss classify its height. The object must then either move away far far away or move down to correct the problem. So gravity is a miss classification of height distance function //Per

  • @brendawilliams8062

    @brendawilliams8062

    2 жыл бұрын

    Even the colors of the rainbow consist of waves. One for everyone to take shelter under ,and so then knowing that the storm moved on.

  • @2a.m.454
    @2a.m.4549 ай бұрын

    The pictures are great. I enjoy the organization of pentagons but I still can’t find the pentagins

  • @thetinkerist
    @thetinkerist2 жыл бұрын

    One hour certainly is too short. More! :)

  • @doctorspockARTS
    @doctorspockARTS2 жыл бұрын

    At 47:00 at the height of the most intriguing part of this entire lecture the host complained about the time. I was thinking don’t mess up the Kepler story!!!

  • @Paine137

    @Paine137

    2 жыл бұрын

    Penrose goes into detail in one of his older RI lectures. Easy search.

  • @StarSong936
    @StarSong9362 жыл бұрын

    @ 40:16 The Penrose Tile looks regular, but it's not. That is the thing I like most about it.

  • @chensergeant5959
    @chensergeant59592 жыл бұрын

    Alfred Nobel didn't create the Nobel Prize, and he died in 1896. The Nobel Prize was created from his testament and will, after he died. The first prize was *awarded* in 1901.

  • @DouwedeJong
    @DouwedeJong2 жыл бұрын

    johan de witt also worked on the problem of Penrose tiles.

  • @helenbostock2350
    @helenbostock23502 жыл бұрын

    This is just very interesting. I love to chat with you I got questions.

  • @ellie698
    @ellie6982 жыл бұрын

    Sonia Contera's lecture is fabulous. I can't add this comment on her video because the comments are turned off but i needed to say it. She's an excellent speaker. And a fascinating subject.

  • @PromitMoitra
    @PromitMoitra2 жыл бұрын

    I wish they'd let him talk more about the collapse of the wavefunction

  • @michaelsimonson4018
    @michaelsimonson40182 жыл бұрын

    Sir I believe if you remove Mas from eistiens theory of relativity you will be able to explain much more about the quantum realm of time and space. Mass is honestly a constant if you take totality into consideration.

  • @mayflowerlash11
    @mayflowerlash112 жыл бұрын

    It's easy to be puzzled by why a guy who understands patterns (Penrose) is considered to be a genius. Then we listen to him talk for an hour about AI and consciousness and what is and is not a mathematical proof, etc, then we have an inkling of why he is a genius. He thinks about the subtle meaning of things like quantum mechanics. Be honest, how many viewers understood that Schroedinger with his cat was trying to hint at why his theory did NOT constitute the last word in a theory of the physical world. It was news to me.

  • @belava82
    @belava8210 күн бұрын

    You can't say that understanding is not a computational problem because of Godel incompleteness due to the fact that brain is not a Deterministic Turing Machine. Brain for sure is using randomness to generate and estimate models unlike DTM. That's why human brains can get around Godel because some of them thanks to randomness will generate such set of rules that will emerge as more complete solution vs previous. And yes, quantum effects can be the source of it. Understanding is a computational procedure performed in our brains. We just don't know yet how it is really done.

Келесі