Bishop Barron’s delivery really is consistently incredible!

So great to see this as rough cut video. I could listen to Bishop Barron all day.

I think this uncut video is a wonderful demonstration of the Holy Spirit speaking through a sincere and noble soul. Despite the fact that the interviewer and the cameraman did everything they possibly could to distract, disrupt and distress Bishop Barron, over a protracted period of time, they failed to do so. On the contrary, Bishop Barron showed great tolerance and patience to their ineptitude, great warmth and openness to their questions, and great generosity of spirit in choosing to read the obvious skulduggery as a lack of professionalism. He even allowed them more time! May The Blessed Trinity continue to pour grace in such abundance upon you Bishop Barron. Mary

I am in awe of the wisdom of the intelligence of your witness. May the gifts of the Holy Spirit continue to guide you throughout your journey. I wish you true Joy and Peace for a long, healthful life.

So knowledgable and so easy to understand. I could listen to you all day. But it is best to go away and think about what you so eloquently describe. I listen to your videos and have been greatly enriched by them. Thank you.

I thoroughly enjoy listening to Bishop Barron, and I am not even a Catholic. Better yet, I am not even a Christian. But, his logical arguments connecting various complex philosophical issues is very intriguing.

I AM always moved and "moved yo grow" by your talks; You 've been addressed in so many thankful ways, I Will have yo end calling You, as a lady.did:( without the coma): Beautiful Bishop!

Bishop Barron, happy Birthday, I pray for the Holy Spirit come to you always. His bless you.

This is great. Thank for posting. Bishop Barron is always so insightful. I enjoyed getting to here the interviewer and producer's questions in this uncut video, too!

Wonderful Bishop Barron!! The Holy Spirit at work once again through you and your knowledge of God!

@theresagahappy

6 жыл бұрын

I grew up in a Catholic home, went to Catholic school and had non Catholic family and friends. I was born in '46. I was feeling nervous about the fact what was taught before Vatican. II. Because I just didn't buy it all. Then Vatican II came along and my faith came alive and I was so relieved that I could follow that other Christians had much to add to my already growing faith. I love the immersion of believers and love your wonderful series. I must have played, prayed and listened to the Catholicism series 20 times, loaned it to others, bought additional so I could share even more. I also listened to full audio of many other of your series and loaned them out. I have Pivotal Players and Tre Ore, MYSTERY OF GOD. I caNt tell you Robert Barron how much I appreciate your series. At the end of this you began to talk about how all Christians need to unite against secularism and that is my dream as well. All Christian in all ways speak up for God and His Creation. I recommend your KZread videos to people all the time as well. THANK YOU!!

Happy birthday, Bishop Barron. With prayers!

You are so gifted and patient with your interviewers. It’s amazing how you know exactly where you were when you stopped at the last clip, and you pick up mid-stream in the next clip. That takes presence of mind and an ability to multi-task. Nice work! God has blessed you with many gifts and thank you for sharing.

Thank you, Father Barron. You have helped me in so many ways during a very difficult time in my life. I like the idea of Temporal Punishment , here on earth. This has consoled me. Perhaps my sufferings have some meaning!

Excellent Teaching Bishop Barron!I wish you could receive better interview conditions! 💒💒💒

I love this man.

It’s always interesting seeing behind the scenes for your videos. Awesome!

most amazing Bishop ...God Bless..

Happy Birthday, Bishop Barron. AVB

Dear Bishop Barron, I am beginning to think that if you had existed in year 1517, you may be able to have a good discourse with Martin Luther and the Church may had moved forward in a better light instead...

Thank you so much. I've learned so much from your talks. Please keep up these awesome videos... May God and our Lord Jesus Christ be with you always

What a genius listen to him how fluently he speaks on such enormously complex topics which are far above average thinking. Moreover look how he switches into humble mode when he is listenening to the woman who "directs" him. He could easily look down to her in contempt as his brain is of totally different capacity yet he listens patiently and look at her warmly. A true Christian. BTW I feel he is "stronger" in debates than in catholic surroundings like churches etc. When he speaks to laymen he resembles Jesus, calm, totally confident, yet loving and comforting but when he is among "his" people he is a bit nervous and uncertain with their support, disappointed with their lackluster attention... , my English fails me to describe it properly. This is what my heart tells me, totally based just on my feelings, a BS maybe ...

Keep up the great work!

This is excellent

Concept of "God's Glory is when a saved person is fully alive" is something I subscribe to. It makes sense. If you are under Grace, it means you are a new creation in Christ and Grace and obedience must go hand in hand (as opposed to the disobedience of Adam and Eve). In fact, traditional Protestant denominations such as Anglican and Methodism subscribe to this view as well.

An interview like this with Bishop Barron on Orthodoxy would be of great interest too.

Thanks for this uncut version; it shows the workings of the Bishop's mind as well as his amiability. How is the final or cut version entitled so that I can download it?

The Catholic Catechism of my pre Vatican II Catholic school training taught unambiguously that Purgatory inhabitants experienced the same excruciating physical pain of fire experienced by the inhabitants of Hell. The only difference was that it would not last forever.

Form + Matter = Substance. The substance is what changes in the Eucharist whereas the form and matter remain the same.

We will all be united when everyone becomes Catholic.

@deusimperator

7 жыл бұрын

It could be worse, we could become protestants and later find out that everyone in heaven is a Catholic....

@rosanneramos6404

7 жыл бұрын

+tim spangler can you explain what you mean by horrible.. why is it horrible to you?

@beatrizmartinez5760

7 жыл бұрын

The Gruntled Monk 😂😂😂I just get of 6 years ago. After 55 years of being deceive blind and captive in a Marian convent worshiping Mary Mary Mary. Well her son save me He was the one that give His life for all humanity

@deusimperator

7 жыл бұрын

You are an idiot +Beatriz Martinez you never worshipped Mary. You are a dumbass moron who was probably never been a catholic. Any Catholic will know that we do not worship the Blessed Virgin Mary. idiot. At at least 61 years of age you are still an imbecilic moron.

@beatrizmartinez5760

7 жыл бұрын

deusimperator Oh wow what a mouth for being a believer. Do t you read you bible? James 3:10 "From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not to be so" That's the problem with Catholics they feel free of cursing and gossiping and more and more. I was there. But now the Holy Spirit guide me Matthew 15:11 "English Standard Version it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person.” 😊😊😊

I believe this is uncut roll for a PBS series "The Reformation: This Changed Everything"

👏🏻

👍😀😘 Brill!

I like that I'll be made to run in Dante's purgatory as, slothful as I am. That sold the whole purgatory heresy to me. LOL!

@danielsampong6607

3 жыл бұрын

Look up Brant Pitre on Jesus teaching on purgatory here on KZread. The channel’s name is Catholic productions

what's this for? is this the official word on fire video?

@ryuninja1388

7 жыл бұрын

Rick Grimes a Catholic?

@OneCatholicSpeaks

7 жыл бұрын

The female voice sounds like Joan from EWTN's show

They really told him how to speak.

What is this?

The camera person should be quiet lol

Whoever filmed this has betrayed the trust of the interviewee.

@MissTEO1

7 жыл бұрын

how so?

Dangerous teaching

@mariesinnecker4450

2 жыл бұрын

Why?

So , why , if you are at a moment in time confess you sin and accept that you believe that Jesus died Once and for all on the cross and became sin and took upon Himself the curse that was due to us, why would your purgatory still be necessary? All I heard as far I was able to continue to listen is totally not biblical . The Catholic addition to their faith is man made

The camera man is a weekend theologian lol...guy needs to know his place a lil

46:04 min of the video: "Lutheran order within Catholicism ..?" Dear Bishop, you do say many intelligent words prior to conclusions, but in likely manner of the Vatican II, you just cannot stop in the end from slipping over incongruities and falling into blind sentimentalism of forced, unintelligent closures. You last statement (Order of Luther) contradicts first (a list of Luther's blatant mistakes), like two horns on a head, each growing in opposite direction. Martin Luther could not contain himself; a man of huge appetites, lustful and sick of penance and charity, not even a good logician and even poorer theologian, invented a whole 'new theology' at the requests of princes - his real masters. When princes who fell into huge debts looted of the property of the Church, and shared some of it with Luther (who had enormous appetites), wanted some sort of "theological explanation" for their criminal acts.

@eliaslucero6606

7 жыл бұрын

dude he said if he had emphasized the primacy of grace there could have been.

@zvonimirtosic6171

7 жыл бұрын

He did not have a dimmest chance to become any sort of a role model. The bishop did not tell the entire background story of Martin Luther, in fact he avoided it, and touched only Luther's "theological treatise". But that background story makes Luther totally incapable to become even a sophist, least a Christian. Fellow Protestants of his, like Thomas Müntzer, could not stand the guy because they recognised what Luther was doing, and that was not genuine because of Luther's degraded, lustful character. Müntzer wrote him openly, "You are doing this only for the princes". That is, the money. When he was accusing Church for selling indulgencies, he was amassing money from the theft of Church's property. He was a thief, a hypocrite, and also a pimp: to gain support from the lords, he would offer them fairest looking nuns from the convents his supporters overtook.

@eliaslucero6606

7 жыл бұрын

Did he do wrong yes, thats the thing, if he had been better he could have helped the church reform through criticism (which he did, which is a good thing) and had a theological statement based on the primacy of grace. Unfortunately it didn't go that way.

@zvonimirtosic6171

7 жыл бұрын

"helped the church reform through criticism" …That is a theologically false statement. It is on the same level as to say Body of Christ was corrupt. Church, as her Lord, is immutable and is perfect. That is also bishop's problem, he refers to the Church as she needs more perfection. Obviously, as a proud child of the Vatican II, statement that the world is welcome to point to Church her shortcomings, definitely is not missing from his discourse in the video.

@zvonimirtosic6171

7 жыл бұрын

I am not "criticising" him, but pointing to obvious flaws in logic already seen before, and for avoiding telling the whole the truth about Martin Luther. If we were discussing mathematics, and I telling Mr Baron he made a mistake in a coefficient and vector, does that constitute a "criticism", and does it not help mathematics in general? So that is my point.

Lost me at 33:00 - garbage, unfortunately...

@sstroh08

5 жыл бұрын

Is God all that is good?

There are many problems with Bishop Barron's theology. The biggest one is for me is scripture first... which is wrong. Magisterium and Tradition have at least equal value to scripture. Scripture requires the Sacred Tradition to be understood. Bishop Barron, instead of courting Protestantism first do your primary job, shepherding the people in correct belief. Tradition and the magisterium are both older than scripture. Until the invention of the printing press 500 years ago no one could own a bible due to cost of a copy!!! Stop conflating luther and calvin into our religion. Shame on you for not not learning as to what Catholicism is. Most of our beliefs are handed down from Sacred Tradition. We do not follow the traditions of men. the inventions of men such as Luther or Calvin but much handed down by Moses carried down to this age. Let me give you a lesson in Tradition Bishop Barron - I certainly rather have a rabbi teach me Catholic Tradition than you: When Moses came down from Mt. Sinai he brought with him the Written Law and the Oral Tradition. It did not take 40 days for the Lord to chip away the stone but it took Moses 40 days to learn the tradition from the Lord and how to apply it. The Written Law cannot be understood without the Oral Tradition as taught by the rabbis (who sit in the seat of Moses). Those Jews who attempt to read the Written Law without the Oral Tradition as taught by rabbis are considered ignorant fools. If you are not Jewish and attempt to read the Written Law, you will never understand it, because it was written for those already Jewish. Thus, being within encultured and living within the tradition of the Jews the Written Law will make sense. How is one to understand the Bible? The Bible was written for those already Jews or Catholics (post-Messianic Jews). It is extremely difficult to understand the bible out of this binary context. Since a Jew or a Catholic is already a member of culture and living within that Catholic or Jewish culture the Bible will makes sense as it the intended audience. If you are not a Catholic or a Jew you are not the intended audience, and never will be. One cannot learn the faith from the Bible as it is not self-explanatory and was never intended to be. The Bible can be only understood correctly and its complete context in the light of Sacred Tradition as presented by the Magisterium by those sitting in the chair of the Bishop. It is only within this context can the Bible find its meaning. Like Judaism, Catholicism requires instruction and enculturation - meaning that it practiced in the life which is lived. Becoming a Catholic or a Jew takes time and study and you can literally spend a lifetime in study of either one of these Faiths. Once a person become “officially” a catholic after going through the RCIA process and get the triple slam of sacraments you only have dipped your foot in the pool. Becoming Catholic just takes time; there is the Catholic vocabulary you will need to learn. It can take a few years of being a Catholic to be *Catholic*. However, if you are already a Jew reading it, it makes a lot of sense. Why? Because you come to it with the correct assumptions already. The Bible assumes that you already know what it talking about. These preconceived notions are absolutely necessary to understand the bible. Without these preconceptions the Bible does not make sense. It is written for a predetermined audience. To those outside Catholicism and Judaism tradition might as well be a four letter word and oftentimes subjected to ridicule and derision by those outside these faiths. Does the Bible favor tradition or does it not? The bible is not clear in the least. In one place it appears to reject it and in another require it. There is no clarity even in the New Testament and by itself is useless. Take Matthew 15 for example, we know Jesus is talking about a specific takkanah. Priests were required to wash their hands prior to performing rituals in the sanctuary during the Second Temple Period with the Bread of the Presence. However, the Rabbis extended this to ordinary people engaged in ordinary life who found this harder to keep than the priests who lived a consecrated more secluded life. Like the Jewish priests of the STP period, Catholic Priests conduct the ablutions accompanied by the relevant prayers prior to the Liturgy of the Eucharist, but there is no mandate that an ordinary Catholic do so, however basic hygiene requires one to do so. Jesus goes on to compel obedience to those who sit in the seat of Moses but not to act in the manner as they would. Take another example should perform charitable without someone knowing about it or should one do so that it is an example to others - fully visible to others. Again, the Bible lacks clarity in this regard condemning it and requiring it in another place. Again this can easily be understood once you understand the teaching of the Jews and Catholics. It is best when giving that you do not know to whom you give and the receiver does not know who the benefactor is. But the Church also wants to encourage people to donate to causes and if a person should do so in full visibility of others it would be an encouragement to others to follow suit. Each has its place and the intention and context is important but these are not provided anywhere in the Written Word. The clarity is not provided scripture but those tasked with teaching scripture. The Lord never meant the words written in stone (or on paper) to be read and understood without Tradition or the sages or those in authority. It was always meant to be heard by the believers and taught by those who knew the Tradition and had the authority to do so. They are to teach and we are required to learn from them. Jesus compels us to obedience to these authorities in the Church or synagogue. The Catholic Church is a missionary and teaching Church, or else simply handing out bibles is sufficient enough. We see this illustrate for us by the Ethiopian eunuch who reads the scripture but cannot make sense out of it. But when he is taught by Philip understands the scripture. This is the reason why the Bible was not taught to new converts. Rather the Jews of the period created a document called the Didache which provides a new gentile convert the required Catechesis to understand the general principles of the Faith before becoming a Catholic and getting a mikvah. The Catholic Jews knew well that the Bible would take time to learn, and as long as the convert has an open heart and mind to the Faith as was preached. The Didache is older than the Bible and was by many considered inspired and a contender for the Book which became a part of the New Testament canon. Which in the end was decided solely by those books which were used in the Catholic Liturgy.

@MatthewSewellMT

7 жыл бұрын

OOOOOH BOY. Friend, I'd encourage you to continue watching Bishop Barron's videos and seeking to truly understand what he's teaching. He'd be the first one to say that scripture AND tradition are what the Church stands on.

@deusimperator

7 жыл бұрын

Matthew Sewell To say the primacy of scripture is very problematic. Did you read what I wrote - completely? If not do so. The Bible is not something a person can read and understand. The context of the Bible is in the Catholic Church.

@MatthewSewellMT

7 жыл бұрын

Brother, you seem to be placing the primacy, by your own words, on the Magisterium, when in fact the "Three-legged stool" of Scripture, Tradition, and the Church all must stand as one. And objectively speaking, it's out of Scripture that all of this springs, so in a sense Scripture does indeed have a sort of "primacy" among them -- all that we are as Catholic Christians is founded first and foremost in Scripture.

@deusimperator

7 жыл бұрын

Matthew Sewell I am unsure if you know Catholic Church history so let me provide you something to consider for your edification. And let me point out where you are mistaken. So make sure you read this to the end. First your notion that the Catholic Church is based on scripture. The Catholic Church existed before scripture - thus scripture is the product of the Catholic Church, the Church is _not_ the product of scripture. Thus, the Church cannot in a chronological and historic sense be based on scripture - rather scripture is based upon Her. A parent is not based upon the child, but the child based upon the parent. Paul states emphatically that the pillar and the grounding of the faith is the Church. Our faith is based on the Church and not on the Bible or any of the other legs of the stool. The Magisterium, Sacred Tradition and scripture play a supportive role. The Church can exist without scripture, and has done so - but She cannot exist without the Magisterium nor without Sacred Tradition. This can be demonstrated historically. What existed first always has overall primacy, Jesus Christ's apostolic mandate was to go out and to teach, thus, the Teaching Authority of the Church has ultimate primacy. This is what we call the Magisterium (magister= teacher). Next in line is Sacred Tradition. Before the Church the first letter of the NT was penned, Sacred Tradition existed. Thus, sacred tradition existed, where people lived within the tradition of the Apostles before scripture was written. Let's fast forward 300+ years after the Church was established and to the canonization of the books of the Bible. Prior to the establishment of the canon of the NT, not one Church Father had the correct canon of scripture listed. There were 450 books which all claimed apostolic origins at the time, yet the 27 books of the NT were established solely due to Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium both of which were required to establish the Bible. When the bishops of the Church met to deliberate over the canon of scripture they ultimately did so based on solely the books used in the liturgy of the Western Church and the matter settled in council. Here we see both Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium establishing was constitutes scripture. So scripture cannot have primacy over those which established it. Is scripture necessary for salvation? NO, but it is nice to have. Do we need the Church for salvation? YES! YES!! YES!!! Ask yourself if people were being saved for the first 1500 years of Christianity and if so how? Definitely not through the bible! 90% of the population could not read! They were saved because the Catholic Church was teaching the Apostolic Faith. Of the remaining 10% 99.9% did not own a bible as it was too expensive. The cost of procuring a bible was *extremely* costly until the invention of the printing press. In fact, without the printing press Protestantism could not have existed! Are you aware that the cost of a bible cost four to five times the price of a middle class house prior to the printing press or the approximately 15 times the income of a middle class household? Are you aware that two bible were produced in around 2002 using the techniques of the period at the cost of $10.2 million? Remember when Gutenberg lost his business to creditors, it was the Catholic Church which bought the assets for his creditors and reinstated him as the printer, printing bibles for the Church as there was a shortage of bibles? I hope I have cleared your confusion.

@deusimperator

7 жыл бұрын

***** I did not say I spoke for the Church... and neither do you. When Bishop Barron speaks here his is only providing his opinion as well, as I am doing so here. However, as an auxiliary bishop he does not sit in the chair of the bishop, his diocese bishop does and when he does so, he does not only for his diocese. Bishop Barron does not have a universal jurisdiction and therefore no universal magisterial authority and can only exercise " living magisterium" at his own bishop's pleasure. So, he too is just a guy with an opinion right? Perhaps you might want to correct me, but first let's see your JCD credentials. If you have an issue, let's hear your objections to what I have stated. Read what I wrote and pick it apart if you wish, let me know as to where I erred.