Beyond Einstein: In Search of the Ultimate Explanation

Ғылым және технология

Albert Einstein spent his last thirty years unsuccessfully searching for a ‘unified theory’ - a single master principle to describe everything in the universe, from tiny subatomic particles to immense clusters of galaxies. In the decades since, generations of researchers have continued working toward Einstein’s dream.
Renowned physicists Leonard Susskind and Jim Gates, and prominent historian Peter Galison discussed what’s been achieved and tackle pivotal questions. Would a unified theory reveal why there is a universe at all? Would it tell us why mathematics is adept at unraveling nature’s mysteries? Might it imply we are one universe of many, and what would that mean for our sense of how we fit into the cosmos? Moderated by Nobel Laureate Paul Nurse.
This program is part of the Big Ideas Series, made possible with support from the John Templeton Foundation.
The World Science Festival gathers great minds in science and the arts to produce live and digital content that allows a broad general audience to engage with scientific discoveries. Our mission is to cultivate a general public informed by science, inspired by its wonder, convinced of its value, and prepared to engage with its implications for the future.
Subscribe to our KZread Channel for all the latest from WSF.
Visit our Website: www.worldsciencefestival.com/
Like us on Facebook: / worldsciencefestival
Follow us on twitter: / worldscifest
Original Program Date: June 1, 2008
MODERATOR: Paul Nurse
PARTICIPANTS: Janna Levin, Jim Gates, Peter Galison, Leonard Susskind
Participant Introductions 00:00
Why was Einstein interested in the unified theory? 2:39
Where are we today with the unified theory? 7:55
Who was James Maxwell? 12:18
What is string theory? 19:26
The Unified Theory of Biology. 24:28
What biology thinks about String theory. 36:20
How successful have the symmetries been in string theory? 42:40
The unanswerable questions of Physics. 52:57
Why is physics not apparent in our everyday life? 56:40

Пікірлер: 256

  • @WorldScienceFestival
    @WorldScienceFestival6 жыл бұрын

    Hello, KZreadrs. The World Science Festival is looking for enthusiastic translation ambassadors for its KZread translation project. To get started, all you need is a Google account. Check out Beyond Einstein: In Search of the Ultimate Explanation to see how the process works: kzread.info_video?v=BHJQMYgLQcA&ref=share To create your translation, just type along with the video and save when done. Check out the full list of programs that you can contribute to here: kzread.info_cs_panel?c=UCShHFwKyhcDo3g7hr4f1R8A&tab=2 The World Science Festival strives to cultivate a general public that's informed and awed by science. Thanks to your contributions, we can continue to share the wonder of scientific discoveries with the world.

  • @Dr10Jeeps
    @Dr10Jeeps9 жыл бұрын

    As a semi-retired Ph.D. psychologist I have become increasingly fascinated with particle physics and cosmology during the past few years and listen to/read everything I can get my hands on. What an incredibly stimulating intellectual journey.

  • @DocSeville

    @DocSeville

    2 жыл бұрын

    This stuff is great! I left high school to work and have to say that to have this type of information available free... well I'm a KZread addict!

  • @TomekSamcik69
    @TomekSamcik699 жыл бұрын

    Leonard Susskind honors with his gaze only those who at least understand differential calculus.

  • @nastybastardatlive

    @nastybastardatlive

    3 жыл бұрын

    Sounds like he's from lawn guyland.

  • @StaticBlaster
    @StaticBlaster2 ай бұрын

    Man, this program aired a long time ago - right after I graduated from high school and before I started college in the Fall of 2008.

  • @vicplichota
    @vicplichota9 жыл бұрын

    3 thumbs-up for this one... an utterly brilliant discussion!

  • @JamesToupin
    @JamesToupin9 жыл бұрын

    As with all of these presentations from The World Science Festival, another brilliant discussion. I find these talks so fascinating even when conveying ideas we may already be familiar with, because they allow us a glimpse of how the finest minds in the field approach the problems.

  • @MrVaypour

    @MrVaypour

    8 жыл бұрын

    +James Toupin Approach is everything.

  • @mihey5739

    @mihey5739

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@MrVaypour w

  • @timoth88
    @timoth885 жыл бұрын

    That historian guy is such a good speaker. Damn

  • @kkp502
    @kkp502 Жыл бұрын

    Symphony of different notes played on the same one kind of a thing. What a great description , hat's off...

  • @soubhikmukherjee6871
    @soubhikmukherjee68713 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant and lively discussion 👏

  • @iamryun
    @iamryun9 жыл бұрын

    Another hour please.

  • @monitaryumnam179
    @monitaryumnam1793 жыл бұрын

    Leonardo thank you for your consideration about concept of dimension

  • @povilasrackauskas857
    @povilasrackauskas8579 жыл бұрын

    Yes! Thank you!!! I've been waiting for this for so long !!!

  • @RagnarTheNerd
    @RagnarTheNerd9 жыл бұрын

    I found dr Susskind's remark at 26:50 quite fascinating; the letters A,C,G and T play a prominent role both in fundamental biology and in fundamental physics, with a being the cosmic scale factor function determining the Hubble parameter.

  • @onderozenc4470
    @onderozenc44703 жыл бұрын

    Maxwell equations already can explain very well the unified fields theory via the interaction if the displacement currents with the magnetic fields resulting in gravitational fields.

  • @001__aadityamgoel__me6
    @001__aadityamgoel__me62 жыл бұрын

    Respected sir Pls attach the English subtitles with all videos. It really help us Thanku,

  • @AmxCsifier
    @AmxCsifier8 жыл бұрын

    Love this channel

  • @Silly.Old.Sisyphus
    @Silly.Old.Sisyphus8 жыл бұрын

    the Universe wasn't made the way it is just so you could be here... you were made the way you are just because the Universe is the way it is

  • @jkang471

    @jkang471

    7 жыл бұрын

    djhbrown very good!

  • @alverafarooqui1270

    @alverafarooqui1270

    5 жыл бұрын

    djhbrown true agreed

  • @skipsch
    @skipsch9 жыл бұрын

    I love discussions like this. It's like taking a step back from science and looking at what the best way to go about it is. Makes me think about Taoism.

  • @canaryculture4783
    @canaryculture47839 жыл бұрын

    A possible values of a unification theory is that the theory might reveal some physical and technological possibilities that might be possible that we have not considered before. topics like, speed of light, other dimensions, multiverse ect, ect

  • @Gringohuevon
    @Gringohuevon6 жыл бұрын

    One of the better ones..a good knowledgeable host..instead of the usua gasbags

  • @joeyxl3456
    @joeyxl34569 жыл бұрын

    great talk

  • @onderozenc4470
    @onderozenc44703 жыл бұрын

    Quantum theory and general relativity, this intuitive unity is only possible by a model of interaction of neutrinos with the gravitational fields such as the tunneling of neutrinos through the galactic gravitational fields.

  • @alpacino4857
    @alpacino48573 жыл бұрын

    100 years past by and we still talk about the Einstein.

  • @therealjordiano
    @therealjordiano9 жыл бұрын

    awesome talk :D

  • @AsratMengesha
    @AsratMengesha9 жыл бұрын

    Does string theory work with none real/false dimensions?

  • @soubhikmukherjee6871
    @soubhikmukherjee68713 жыл бұрын

    Janna is a beautiful physicist.I love how she influences.

  • @philharmer198
    @philharmer198 Жыл бұрын

    32:36 into the video , when space is understood to be absolute .

  • @zeuchehcuez
    @zeuchehcuez8 жыл бұрын

    An Ultimate Algorithm is the key to decode the universal law that governs the universe.

  • @zeuchehcuez

    @zeuchehcuez

    8 жыл бұрын

    +zeuchehcuez A higher form of mathematics in a higher dimension is the language of the universe.

  • @Tree-bw2li

    @Tree-bw2li

    8 жыл бұрын

    +zeuchehcuez O RLY?

  • @jamesbrower418

    @jamesbrower418

    8 жыл бұрын

    meaning what? E=MC is right, with all the possibilities, the theories about what 4 10 different types? it make it hard to ask a question when you see the answer for all of them. my theory is in every black hole there has to be a singularity thus a universe is born inside added with dark matter dark energy

  • @gerrynightingale9045
    @gerrynightingale90458 жыл бұрын

    "All of the energy and matter that existed still exists. Matter does not create energy of itself. It is the actions of matter that enable energy to become manifest".

  • @unnikrishnannairkrishnannair.
    @unnikrishnannairkrishnannair. Жыл бұрын

    Vey interesting discussion

  • @user-sn3ci8on7g
    @user-sn3ci8on7g2 жыл бұрын

    Great moderator

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor54629 жыл бұрын

    50:00 Was mathematics invented or discovered by humans? Would space aliens use the exact same mathematics (calculus, algebra, ext..) that we use? We know that Newton came up with the rules of the Calculus, which was required to calculate orbits. Is there another type of math that has yet to be invented/discovered that is required to find the TOE?

  • @thedeepspacevoid

    @thedeepspacevoid

    9 жыл бұрын

    let me help..base 10 math is not used by all humans.....look up "58 and other confusing numbers" on channel 'numberphile'... you will get hooked on brady's vids.

  • @erictaylor5462

    @erictaylor5462

    9 жыл бұрын

    thedeepspacevoid This is not true. Base 60 was used by the ancient Babylonians. It's why we have the time system we do, which is confusing in base ten. In computing base 2 is used (digital) and the Romans were so whacked they had no concept of zero. But even if true it doesn't answer my question. Was mathematics discovered or invented? It doesn't matter what base number system you use., mathematics will give the same answer.

  • @ravindertalwar553
    @ravindertalwar5532 жыл бұрын

    NO TEARS NO FEARS ONLY CHEERS AND CHEERS FOR ALL NEARS AND DEARS

  • @stephenarmiger8343
    @stephenarmiger83437 ай бұрын

    Wonderful!

  • @lisaadler507
    @lisaadler5076 жыл бұрын

    And they thought dark matter and dark em energy had to be there...

  • @Oneffunes
    @Oneffunes Жыл бұрын

    The corn. Why is it so necessary that the unified theory must describe everything coming to being out of its existence? It’s the symmetry of the unified structure that the likeness of the structure expresses itself through the particles that is within it.

  • @ng21644605
    @ng216446058 жыл бұрын

    It's ALL in THE MIND !

  • @Sluchowiska
    @Sluchowiska9 жыл бұрын

    Susskind is a cool guy.

  • @lylesfredidog1507
    @lylesfredidog15074 жыл бұрын

    It's impossible to have a unified theory if you only know part of the problem!

  • @mohinderjitaujla6245

    @mohinderjitaujla6245

    4 жыл бұрын

    Lyles Fredidog …You are right , Buddy…They don’t know or discuss major part of the Problem that is Spiritual Part. , that’s beyond Even Meta Physics…It would remain impossible for ever say..JagtarSinghAujla California

  • @naimulhaq9626
    @naimulhaq96268 жыл бұрын

    Hegel's 'unity of opposites', is the true unified theory, that enabled the creation/prediction of positron by Dirac. At the big bang dark matter and dark energy with opposite properties were produced, followed by production of particles and anti-particles, followed by matter and anti-matter..... and on to hot and cold, up and down, male and female etc. Strange Hegel had no idea of positron or anti-gravity, yet his unified theory explains quantum mechanics etc.

  • @ezza88ster
    @ezza88ster9 жыл бұрын

    Hey Ben. I agree more interesting with the standing back from the detail of the subject. Interesting comment about Taoism too I think. Made me think yeah how the one becomes two as in yin and yang. And then the dance of the two creates the many-fold forms. Yin and Yang could be energy and matter or force and form etc. Thus all the rest of physics becoming emergent. Physics as biology hmmmm!

  • @geocarag
    @geocarag9 жыл бұрын

    what about Q&A section ?!

  • @tracyscanlon4587

    @tracyscanlon4587

    9 жыл бұрын

    Yes, I have plenty of them!

  • @nastybastardatlive
    @nastybastardatlive3 жыл бұрын

    Pasta? What, elbows? Lasagna? Rigatoni? Angel hair? Oh! He unified all pasta products! I'm sure Italians everywhere are pleased.

  • @ooofuture0970
    @ooofuture09707 жыл бұрын

    does having the patent signify a understanding of the product or is the engineering different

  • @JohnFHendry

    @JohnFHendry

    7 жыл бұрын

    It's an invitation to a lawsuit after showing how it works... any law in place for the little guy with less than 2 million in the bank is an illusion.

  • @mikaelzurich6166
    @mikaelzurich61664 жыл бұрын

    Why is janna lavin name isn't in the video description?

  • @whirledpeas3477

    @whirledpeas3477

    3 жыл бұрын

    She's only there because she's female

  • @aminkanji8501
    @aminkanji85012 жыл бұрын

    What's your opinion Jenna???

  • @PankajSingh-dc2qp
    @PankajSingh-dc2qp7 жыл бұрын

    time is change...

  • @JohnFHendry
    @JohnFHendry8 жыл бұрын

    14:00 You left out the part that shows time has asymmetry and gravity is created by the subtrahend of the EM wave. You'll need to add a second arrow to time of course to support both additions. Appreciation and thanks goes to SLAC's BaBar team for confirming time has asymmetry in 2012 which adds a 4th phase (part) to the atom. Too bad politics are hiding what's really going on.

  • @pronounjow

    @pronounjow

    7 жыл бұрын

    Sources?

  • @JohnFHendry

    @JohnFHendry

    7 жыл бұрын

    That's easy as it goes back to the late 40's before dice took over... recently there was CERN's 2011 253.6 mile muon neutrino measurement of (v-c)/c=2.48e-5 sec in 453.6 miles as predicted based on Sommerfeld's observations of the photon using SLAC's E158 weak force asymmetry ratio exposing the asymmetry in time predicted in advance. After the E158 ratio matched CERN's data by creating an asymmetry in time (gravity) SLAC confirmed time has asymmetry a year later in 2012 after SLAC went back over their BaBar experiment's data "looking at it differently" and confirmed time has asymmetry. Unfortunately logic and simplicity is past people who copy mistakes to create new theories.

  • @MMmmmmBobbert
    @MMmmmmBobbert8 жыл бұрын

    The meaning of life.........

  • @shanborshaunshangpliang4198
    @shanborshaunshangpliang41982 жыл бұрын

    If we discussed or you discuss about the formation of the universe it will took several billions of words but still we can't find the specific answers about the universe. Because, no one live long enough to discuss such numbers of words.because there are more planets in the universe than a numbers of cells in our brain. So you know..it's an infinite discussion.

  • @nagahumanbeingzooofparticl8836
    @nagahumanbeingzooofparticl88366 жыл бұрын

    54:07 something funny ran through the host's mind ,don't know what but making a wild guess, i think he was looking at the lady in the panel rubbing her lips childishly. :-)

  • @carldelucia281
    @carldelucia2819 жыл бұрын

    the universe was all at once one matter or energy the same but because of errors or slight defects comming into being we have created many types of matter and energy all came from the same beginning element.from a not perfect symetry because of a change in the origonial what ever it was ,many other elements ,energy and matter were created .We were created as we are from many uncounted changes in the origonial element ,interacting with each other as more were created .That is the unifying theory all things come from the one that started as only one.A huge mathmatical problem ,like code cyphers there are uncounted possibilities.

  • @soubhikmukherjee6871
    @soubhikmukherjee68713 жыл бұрын

    Albert was the smartest person ever lived.

  • @michaelgorby

    @michaelgorby

    2 жыл бұрын

    Perhaps the smartest person who we know about. Statistically speaking, I feel there must've been many smarter folks. But we never hear about them bec they had the bad luck of being born in places where there was no chance of getting an education or due to a multitude of other random factors in life that took them down a different path. For example, Darwin would likely not have had his epiphany if he didn't come from a wealthy family that allowed him to travel the world, etc.

  • @pillettadoinswartsh4974
    @pillettadoinswartsh49745 жыл бұрын

    Let's remember, once scientists unify relativity and quantum theory, they will still be left with the task of unifying materialism and consciousness.

  • @carolineraymond9123
    @carolineraymond912310 ай бұрын

    The thumbnail looks like Brian Green!!!

  • @rgaleny
    @rgaleny9 жыл бұрын

    If Gravity is a subset of EM, Gravity might be subtly variable. It seems to be in gyroscopes.

  • @rgaleny

    @rgaleny

    7 жыл бұрын

    WOW, THAT WAS GREAT. E IS EQUIVALENT TO F IS A GOOD POINT TO MAKE. I DON'T BELIEVE IN BLACK HOLES - SEE STEPHEN CROTHERS ON THIS. YOU MIGHT WANT TO SEE ''AN ARTIST THEORY ON THE PHYSICS OF TIME'; ON YT. IT'S THERMODYNAMIC. IT RELATES TO A THEORY THAT THE ZERO POINT FIELD IS CONSUMED AND TRANSFORMED BY MATTER, AS HEAT MOVED TO COLD, WERE MATTER IS LIKE A SPECTRAL ANTENNA, ABSORBING AND RELEASING PHOTONS AS IS THEIR NATURE. ANOTHER GRAVITY THEORY COMES FROM WAL THORNHILL OF THE ELECTRIC UNIVERSE GROUP, , ALL THE ATOMS OF THE EARTH PACKED TOGETHER BECOME POLARIZED IN A COMMON DOMAIN CREATING A WEAK FORCE = TO G.. THANK YOU FOR SHARING YOU RESEARCH. IT HELPED ME.

  • @JohnFHendry
    @JohnFHendry9 жыл бұрын

    O=E=W=T shows a particle making clock being created by Ohms law and it's many expressions like F=ma looking in a mirror of simple but blinding opposite symmetry of all concepts where relative to the weak force (W) we see a Mass pendulum create multiplication associated with two equal wait states of on/off associated with a wave, and relative to the strong force (T) we see exponential octave (E) division within the time of Observation (O). "Now" is given a beginning and an end for measurement as it's arrow of reverse oscillation phase moves forward in time following its forward oscillation phase with increasing wait states of non-observational awareness the observer does not notice as it waits it's turn for it's own specific harmonic frequency to reoccur. "Relative to the Observer all other Observers are behind it in time". We are playing "leap frog" with time where my clock sees you jump backward and your clock sees me jump backwards as all points of observation fall backwards in time so time can move forward. That's not particularly well stated but like I said the symmetry of time is blinding... and communication of information requires picking a relative frame of reference to express it's inertial frame of reference from, and draw a line of force carrier space separating the weak force from the strong force hidden from a trained physicist using dice by the fine structure constant that would create an asymmetry if not for universal gravity picking up the tail end. Consciousness has Mass and the brain does not create Mass. The brain is a filter of information made out of time and is supported by the 4 forces in physics that extend beyond it creating the 5th force of measurable freewill change based on e-motion. Gravity proves time is real as it is relative to a second reverse arrow's harmonic comma's gain in length, as does the separation of observers by wait states and measured points of past observation held in time dilation and created in harmonic "tonal" octave levels causing the illusion of missing matter to those that don't understand time and the cause of gravity where the further back in time you look the greater the relative effect of time. The more roommates you have, the weaker your vote on what change to create. If you want to see what time is all you have to do is look at light through a slit and make it thinner and you will see a point where the light is rotated from vertical to horizontal that without an answer "why" has perplexed physicists... but as always there is a reason that makes sense and once understood the answer is quite obvious. And the answer why we see the light become horizontal is because it deals with our reference frame of observation which requires the time of two Mass oscillation cycles to create one "instance" of an observed center of gravity in 3 dimensions relative to time that creates the direction of gravity relative to the observer in spacetime, and we are seeing not a precession, but the cause of precession due to "particle" spin. And that observation brings us to understanding gravity connected to light because both are connected to time on opposite ends of two arrows connected to time. There are 3 basic observation frames within a single Mass oscillation and this is why we see 3 "generations" of particles. "When we look at light we are looking at Mass in oscillation, the source of light found within the weak force antiparticle Mass oscillation phase connected to time creating a speed of light clock that should stop our clocks completely in observation of it because it is a master clock signal where the term "relative to light's clock" does not apply as it does to an observer made of particles looking at another observer's particle clocks held together by the strong force.32:00 The "emergent" problem or rather change is caused by time, our only tool of measurement refusing to stay the same length EVEN through a Mass oscillation cycle and the two top/bottom wait states associated with Mass oscillation. If the positron, an antielectron is a fundamental particle then so is the antiproton/neutron for they are the same Mass in oscillation and therefore this applies to their mirror particle states held in time by the strong force. We see our clocks move because time has asymmetry and our clocks are dealing with time dilation separating them based on the constant speed of light. The asymmetry of the weak force {a} is the key to understanding physics in relationship to time and space which eliminates uncertainty. There are no dice and I'm going to prove it using simple basic math to put the outcome of proven complex mathematics together. To make further progress in electronics as well as physics a true or "initial" inertial frame of reference needs to be established for the weak force so the "missing" graviton or "hole" as it is called observed in semiconductors due to it's reverse oscillation phase arrow can have it's phase timing separated from the electron's forward arrow as is already observed and both phases be set relative to the master clock cycle within the weak force so the graviton can have it's 4th oscillation phase in time added to the atom. That's right... the atom has 4 phases or "parts". If space is relative to time, as we know it is, then anything, atoms included oscillating in space must have 4 phases of oscillation and that requires a reverse arrow. You cannot measure a particle's location and it's velocity accurately if you leave out half of time needed to make the measurement. And to do such a measurement you must first establish an inertial frame of reference to set (the length of) the clock being used to measure the particle's location and speed. If you don't know exactly how long the ruler is you can't use it to make a relative measurement on the scale of an atom. And as we go deeper into physics we must include the reverse Mass oscillation phase connected to time responsible for the asymmetry in time SLAC's BaBar data exposed a year after their E158 data showed it first thanks to CERN. You won't like the politics hiding the discovery, but you will find this interesting: e{a}/t=hv. The speed of light is 186282 miles per second: IE 186282 miles = 1 second. This is the result of Mass oscillation or "the Master clock cycle" that has two arrows associated with the DNA's "tonal space" of phosphate and sugar of opposite phase timing creating a pendulum that is slightly longer on the following oscillation phase as the fine structure constant equation shows: e{a}/t=hv. (The fine structure constant is maintaining E as a constant using time dilation, it's a worm hole where more time is measured going back in than came out because time did not stop during the oscillation cycle and time is what we use to measure/observe with. It shows gravity is cause by the subtrahend of the two arrows connecting gravity to the weak force as half of EM... a minute amount more we notice and measure as the direction and force of gravity relative to the observer. CERN's muon phase timed neutrinos were announced Worldwide in 2011 @ (v-c)/c=2.48e-5 sec in 453.6 miles. That is an exact match with SLAC's E158 asymmetry of the weak force data @ 2.48e-5 sec added to the speed of light traveling 453.6 miles creating an asymmetry in time of 20e-5 sec, what we call gravity. After the data was shown to match the E158 ratio SLAC went back over their BaBar data and confirmed the asymmetry in time exposed a year later giving it a sigma 14 level of certainty. *Note that the neutrino created at the speed of light does not exceed the speed of light in adding it's space to the measurement and CERN used muon phase timed neutrinos which is like waiting at a stop light to measure a photon go by and waiting a fraction of a second to make the measurement and adding that added distance to it.* There was a write up on it on Wikipedia but that's been pulled off now but was copied and noted in other areas of the Internet. Here is the simple math that proves it. If you open up a calculator and follow the flow it's easier to see doing it yourself. Weak Force Asymmetry {a} adds 1hour/3600 seconds every 1000 years: Re: SLAC E158 data "using clocks". Muon neutrinos do not exceed speed of light as CERN said "if the data is correct". They are created at the speed of light adding to the speed of light measurement just like the photon "tricks" Summerfeld detected in 1948. (Because their phase angle is @ theta 23 unlike electron neutrinos but you don't need to understand that to see the data match.) 3600sec / 1000 years = 3.6 seconds of weak force asymmetry time added in a year, the distance light travels in 3.6 seconds. 3.6 sec x 186282 (speed of light) = 670615.2 miles added to the speed of light in one year 670615.2 / 365.2425 year = 1836.082055072999 miles added to speed of light in one day 1836.082055072999 / 24 hours = 76.50341896137498 miles added to speed of light in one hour 76.50341896137498 / 60 minutes = 1.275056982689583 miles added to speed of light in one minute 1.275056982689583 / 60 seconds = 0.021250949711493 of a mile added to speed of light in one second Now that we know the know the {a} asy time/distance added in a second to the speed of light (0.021 mile) we need to know the fraction of a second speed of light distance it took for light to travel only 453.6 miles which is the distance CERN's neutrinos traveled to know how much {a} asy time to add to the speed of light traveling 453.6 miles and see if the {a} weak force asymmetry gain in time matches CERN's 2.48e-5 sec neutrino gain in time exactly as I said it would to create the force of gravity. So we simply divide 186282 miles (which equals one second) by 453.6 miles (the fraction of one second distance the neutrinos traveled) to acquire the weak force asymmetry value added to the speed of light. 186282/453.6 miles = 410.6746031746032 (or 453.6 x 410.6746031746032 =186282 SOL) Now we add the weak force asymmetry time gained to the fraction of one second value of 410.67 0.021250949711493 / 410.6746031746032 = 5.174644243208279 e-5 This shows the forward/back total neutrino oscillation time gained in 453.6 miles caused by the asymmetry of the weak force. Now notice the total asymmetry time gained of 5.17 e-5 sec is almost exactly double CERN's 2.48 e-5 sec past the speed of light. The next two simple calculations change physics by adding a 4th oscillation phase to the atom (graviton) and a second reverse arrow to time needed to support the "missing" graviton misnamed the hole opposite the electron and use CERN's data to show it's correct length relative to the electron and prove time has asymmetry that supports the force of gravity exactly as I had been saying for years never expecting this to happen and be so easy to prove and show that E=T, and time like energy must be conserved. We add a second reverse arrow (required for time to have asymmetry) for time by simply dividing 5.174644243208279 e-5 in half. 5.174644243208279 e-5 / 2 = 2.58732212160414 e-5 sec So we have 2.58732212160414 e-5 sec weak force asymmetry time gained in the forward arrow of time, and 2.58732212160414 e-5 sec weak force asymmetry time gained in the reverse arrow of time. We now add gravity to the second reverse arrow simply by using CERN's data which provides the correct forward arrow measurement of weak force asymmetry added in 453.6 miles by subtracting the forward arrow gain of 2.48e-5 sec from half of the ratio gained in 453.6 miles of 2.58 e-5 sec. 2.58 e-5 - 2.48 e-5 = 0.10 e-5 We now add it to the second reverse arrow 2.58 e-5 + 0.10e-5 = 2.68 e-5 sec So using SLAC's exceptionally specific but proven E158 WF Asy ratio obtained from adding the distance light travels in one hour to the distance light travels in one thousand years applied to 453.6 miles we can see using basic math that SLAC's E158 data matches CERN's neutrino data announced worldwide @ (v-c)/c=2.48e-5 sec in 453.6 miles with both sets of data adding 2.48 e-5 sec in the forward arrow of time and SLAC's data adding 2.68 e-5 sec to the rearward neutrino oscillation phase adding a reverse arrow connected to time. This creates an asymmetry in time of 0.20e-5 sec (2.68 e-5 - 2.48 e-5 = 0.20 e-5) needed for gravity exactly as predicted. CERN Neutrinos @ (v-c)/c = 2.48 e-5 create a lesser diesis (Einstein's Comma) = 0.20 e-5 (0.10e-5 + 0.10e-5) by matching SLAC's E158 asymmetry of the weak force data in the forward arrow of time @ 2.48 e-5 sec in 453.6 miles. This is a game changer from dice to two sided cards because the data match shows time has a reverse Mass oscillation arrow that gravity needs to exist exactly as shown by the Unified Field Theory equation that first showed me and a few others the weak force has an asymmetry that allows our clocks to move independent of each other. SLAC's E158 ratio that creates the asymmetry of the weak force ratio is an incredibly specific ratio and I had been quoting the E158 data for years after finding it's value showing why it had to match like this creating 3 specific ratios out of the E158 ratio to add an asymmetry to time calling it a lesser diesis comma. A coincidence of this magnitude is simply not possible. (This was done long before SLAC went back over their BaBar data and confirmed the asymmetry in time giving it a sigma 14 level of certainty "far more than needed to declare a discovery".) There is a lot of money involved with Science so don't think some scientists won't play games with the truth. To challenge CERN's (v-c)/c=2.48e-5 sec claim neutrinos (CERN used muon phased timed neutrinos) were exceeding the speed of light which they weren't many physicists said the data had to be in error because neutrinos (electron phase timed neutrinos) were measured traveling at the exact speed of light from ten's of thousands of light years away, not exceeding it. The problem with that "correction" is the fact that we know neutrinos oscillate and have mass and the same laws of Relativity that state no particle can exceed the speed of light ALSO state no particle with mass can travel at the speed of light. So the experts used one "impossibility" to dismiss another "impossibility" failing to see the gross error in logic and some tried to reduce the neutrino mass to say there must have been some slight delay but from ten's of thousands of light years away even a "slight" mass amount would be measurable, not to mention CERN stated an exact SOL measurement after they 'fixed" the "loose cable"... LOL There is a reason for observing a difference in electron vs muon phase timed neutrinos but it is beyond the scope of this post's layman presentation. What we see happening in physics where data is "doctored" to make theories fit is what happens when you use "dice" to measure time with rather that listen to the greatest physicist that ever walked the face of Earth when he tells you that "God dose not play dice with the Universe". To be continued.... and check out the troll running on empty.

  • @TimelineProvision

    @TimelineProvision

    9 жыл бұрын

    and I will fly my drone again today

  • @JohnFHendry

    @JohnFHendry

    9 жыл бұрын

    I'll be working on mine... but I never call it a drone;-)

  • @TimelineProvision

    @TimelineProvision

    9 жыл бұрын

    Soldieroftruth lol soldier...

  • @JohnFHendry

    @JohnFHendry

    9 жыл бұрын

    Edit:... Note: "Great White Hope" is the troll "Soldieroftruth" that used a skull in a mirror as his avatar and is also "Propfella" , etc. He uses many fake identities to set up "conversations". It seems KZread made some changes so he can't hide behind so many names ;-) So the replies to "Soldieroftruth" were being made to the same person that is also "The Great White Hope". But be aware there are ways around anything on the Internet and there are many trolls just like him that make a living playing the same multiple identity game where deception and trust are used and "everyone" is surprised "someone" turned out to be a thief and ripped them off. Caution: foul language quoted below. End edit...TP click on this guy’s name if you want to see one of the most interesting examples of what creates an Internet troll and how they come about. A colleague just copied every one of his KZread posts and found more for his new book "Troll" that goes deep into the gene ensemble showing how contradiction (see below) in information frame building is connected to time and therefore emotion through ‘odd and even’ connected to the phase timing of ‘fear and hate’ which was stated online before Vadim Bolshakov and his colleagues discovered the gene that produces the protein ‘stathmin’ supporting the theory by acting as a stimulant of fear connected in phase with phosphate and sugar by being associated with a gene, and later supported by SLAC’s E158 data matching CERN’s neutrino data, and SLAC’s following rebuttal to CERN’s loose cable in going back over the BaBar experiment’s data to confirm the asymmetry in time detected in both experiments giving it a sigma 14 level of certainty. This “soldieroftruth” that came out of nowhere to attack me like all the rest he goes after takes being bipolar and narcissistic, emotional traits found in all humans to some degree without a name until exaggerated, to the next level in an attempt to be hate oriented “monopole” to avoid the phase of fear he feels and the dread acquired from seeing people do positive things that causes him pain. This guy is severely hurt and affected by jealousy created by seeing other people’s accomplishments as simple as building an RC model and flying it, or even seeing someone try to improve themself. His endless stream of posts on KZread show he openly reacts with hate driven profanity in seeing other people’s daily activities and attacks them with insults attempting to create pain in his targets exposing a warning sign of his intent to take it off the Internet and act his feelings out in the real world against anyone that makes him feel insecure. Especially if doing tasks he claims to be an expert of with no history of achievement beyond his own claim of superiority and a mixed up knowledge of FPV he has a fascination with like many normal people he seeks to identify with as long as he is placed on the level of people who are in the top of their field. *“What we are witnessing is a side effect. The creation of the Internet Troll caused by an unusual and abnormal situation brought about by the Internet and the age of the computer. The perceived hidden identities that people think protect them from their own normal reactions of emotional response when interacting with the world around them in greater numbers than ever before is creating negative emotional response patterns in some people stopping the emotional tempering required for survival in the real world. The Troll has been born and arrives on the scene introducing a new species that has evolved like a fungus. And the only way to stop a Troll is to identify it in the real world to expose its outer covering and expose what is hidden inside.”* Check it out: His contradicting view on skulls (his Avatar) “Secondly- you've got a lot of thumbs downs for your upload, you might consider something a little less dark/goth or whatever it is your trying to obtain with all the skulls, it's kinda kids shit if you ask me..” His view on arrogance before it looks like he lost his medication: "You guys are great! I love your reviews & you are what Fpv is supposed to be about, responsibility, no arrogant attitudes & fun fun fun” Followed by countless posts like: ” Did anyone say "WORLD CLASS FUCKING MORON" ! Ohhhh - I did!” “What an arrogant fuck with his shades on & his head cocked like he's looking at a woman's tits for the first time” (The guy is holding up his FPV quad he built) “Take those shades off before somebody like myself bitch slaps the fuckers off your nasty mug!” (And he doesn’t like sunglasses) “This guy is a complete clown!” (He was having fun…) “What a royal fucking bunch of morons” (They were having fun too…) “You are a fucking moron old man, I don't believe you are capable of owning operating a Multirotor safely & with common sense... Get out of the hobby! You are a complete embarrassment to the hobby” Pages and pages of arrogant comments attacking RC hobbiests, some far worse than above. And he doesn’t like black people either: “These British women are beautiful! Problem is I hear they all like *iggers over there, what a waste...’ Or Mexicans: “This fat Mexican bastard needs to find a different line of work, might I suggest Mc Donald's so he can plow another burger” And he has a real way with women: “I would tongue her *hitter just to see what she ate for breakfast! This chick is hotter than most by a LOOOOOOOONGSHOT! “Did someone forget to say "Big fat tub of human *hit"! The only *ock this bowl of pig fat is going to get is Black & on welfare! PERIOD!” And his view from in the closet: “Dude! You are a fucking reject moron! PERIOD! You aren't even close to cute fuckhead” He has a job but it’s not selling FPV quads as he claims: “I have 563 black market copies of season 6, pm me if you want to discuss prices” And a very educated and religious view of Creation: “We already know that lucifer destroyed his first estate & was cast out of the heavens IE outer space, it's thought that the planet that He & his fallen angels inhabited is Mars, there are literally thousands of images of Mars that are covered up and kept from the public eye…. There are several unnamed employees that remain in anonymity for their safety, these employees worked directly with these photos and were employed primarily to airbrush, cover-up, the evidence” This guy’s highly emotional attacks expressing how he feels towards other people are out of context and come out of nowhere except for hate controlling his emotions. He refuses to respond and debate the issues of his attacks as he runs off to create more over and over again. His attacks express a habit he has. A habit seen by simply clicking on his emotionally derived name claiming to be "a soldier of truth" exposing a dangerous and extremely high level of gross insecurity for his place in the world around him. He makes his statements of attack while hiding behind a fake name for security and in my opinion if forced to confront reality with his true identity exposed he will react violently especially against a defenseless woman rather than accept the truth that puts him in his place exposing a weak and obviously sick individual attacking the whole world around him. His actions expose a problem that makes him more than a nuisance by insulting everything he sees. He is a threat to everything he sees with a strong desire to destroy it because of how he feels about himself. Whatever doctor is feeding him medications should be barred from practicing medicine. And the purpose of this post in response to his attack on me is to expose both of them before this guy hurts someone because some pharmaceutical company gives out kickbacks to make money off of selling meds that make people crazier than they were before they started taking them. JFH^^

  • @TimelineProvision

    @TimelineProvision

    9 жыл бұрын

    John F Hendry lol I hear ya bro :)

  • @liznval11
    @liznval115 жыл бұрын

    Quantised/Wave/Fields, MicroMacroEvents or EntireSpacialContent propagate constantly, C, with radio/velocity, that is to say, "everything", E =C. But in "directional interactive encounters" these micro/macro events also propagate relativistically with ranges from 0 through C. Everything equation is C=E/0~C. This fundamental natural law was discovered, some 50 years ago, by Valentine Goroshko....!....

  • @MMmmmmBobbert
    @MMmmmmBobbert8 жыл бұрын

    LOVE

  • @knutholt3486
    @knutholt34866 жыл бұрын

    I do not think QM contributed anything to the invention of transistors. What contributed were simple knowledge about chemical bonds in crystals, the role of electrons in these bonds, and a lot of empirical measurements. Those inventing transistors surely knew about QM, but transistors can be understood well conceptually without knowing anything about QM, and at that time the tools for calculations using QM on these applications were not there. Nowadays I think QM calculation is used more for such purposes, though.

  • @viewer3091
    @viewer30913 жыл бұрын

    Is Matter and Gravity = Anti-Space-Time ?

  • @marucalopez258
    @marucalopez2582 жыл бұрын

    🧠🧠🧠🧠🧠🧠

  • @rodovre
    @rodovre7 жыл бұрын

    Except for Susskind, this lecture didn't get very far. No breaking news in this one.

  • @pronounjow

    @pronounjow

    7 жыл бұрын

    I was nodding off a few times, but the analogy between strings from string theory and DNA was interesting.

  • @zeroonetime
    @zeroonetime8 жыл бұрын

    The next Einstein to be must understand the Quanta as the immanent transition from 0 to 1, from the Intangible 0 to the Tangible 1, from 0-Time to 1-Timing. The Uni-verse I.S. (Information System) dualistic in Nature. Ex Nihilo, comprises the Intangible-Tangible phenomenon - Creation in Action. P.S. Please watch on KZread: 'Neutral Paradigm', and/or read the book: 'The Universe I.S. Made of 0s and 1s. on amazon'.

  • @reishane8846
    @reishane88465 жыл бұрын

    you can not find unification in reality level even mathematics and the problem is that we humans can only access reality....

  • @enlongchiou
    @enlongchiou7 жыл бұрын

    Maybe Einstein known weak force unite EM force by (2/3) power of proton mass time permittivity of free space equal to 4*pi time electron's mass, unite strong force with gravity by ch = g*m^2, unite 4 force only unite gravity with EM force by 1836 ratio of mass of proton to electron.

  • @michgingras
    @michgingras8 жыл бұрын

    explana hum ?!

  • @liburnbossi
    @liburnbossi9 жыл бұрын

    as a 16 yo i understood everything till janna levin started to talk

  • @djfunkycraig

    @djfunkycraig

    3 жыл бұрын

    I was like “listen to the man....buy the book” and ssshhhhhh

  • @mcalister8045
    @mcalister80459 жыл бұрын

    I think I understand the analogy to biology, that the different possible geometries of the extra dimensions correspond to different DNA base pairs. And, this makes possible a huge number of possible sets of laws of physics. But why can't they concentrate on finding the geometries of those dimensions in our universe, and then using that information to make testable predictions that differ from those of the currently accepted theories? I got the impression from the talk that the large number of possibilities makes the scientific method obsolete

  • @MiroslawMagola
    @MiroslawMagola7 жыл бұрын

    Greeting from Munich, Germany. I would like show my abilities on World Science Festival. I can lift objects made of metal off the floor, against the force of gravity. I can holds them against my hands, and moves them vertically or in circles, without any aid . I took part in some Live TV program in Europe and I think it would be good show my performance on World Science Festival or Live TV program in USA and in this way I would like to contribute the new discussion about Newton's law of universal gravitation states and Albert Einstein's famous theory of relativity.

  • @MiroslawMagola

    @MiroslawMagola

    7 жыл бұрын

    Send me your e-mail and I will send you my new video-clip next.

  • @waldemargregorkaiser4080
    @waldemargregorkaiser40809 жыл бұрын

    math is logic and life need math logic and ' vernunft ' than nature grow

  • @noisemagician
    @noisemagician9 жыл бұрын

    Robin Williams

  • @Silly.Old.Sisyphus
    @Silly.Old.Sisyphus7 жыл бұрын

    All DNA sequences ARE (chemically) stable; that's why ancient DNA survives. The reason there are not even more different life forms is that, relatively speaking, very few theoretically possible DNA sequences produce organisms capable of reproduction. But that still doesn't give us a unified theory, because it doesn't explain why DNA and not DNB in the first place.

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert90183 жыл бұрын

    Vo svoje Decke predstave videl som obraz rozšíriť pevninu nad oceánom jedným dychom čas podobný rýchlosti vesmíru veci sa hýbali pomalí

  • @Rico-Suave_
    @Rico-Suave_4 жыл бұрын

    super smart people of our Era, I don't see why they are trying to specifically mix physics with biology.... also people complicate things with emotions......, scientist are just trying to understand the nature of our universe or of how nature/universe works,

  • @AsratMengesha
    @AsratMengesha9 жыл бұрын

    If time does curve with space why don't we curve it further and further to leave for ever without even eating and drinking and not bothering about any thing?

  • @AnimeshSharma1977
    @AnimeshSharma19779 жыл бұрын

    Heheh, it is funny that Physicist are talking about "String theory, DNA of reality", "Cosmic Genome Project", "Eternal Inflation",... no wonder Leonard had to say "My God! It [physics] is no better than biology" ;)

  • @ShashiS

    @ShashiS

    9 жыл бұрын

    Oh Yeah, It's the tools that makes the difference in our understanding. I agree with Jim gates as he says so. _ Shashi ॐ नमः शिवाय Om Namah Shivaya

  • @waryaamoxamad3115
    @waryaamoxamad31159 жыл бұрын

    The stage could have been done better.

  • @jamesbrower418
    @jamesbrower4188 жыл бұрын

    question. with infinite possibilities. dark matter dark energy. as two black holes massive black holes eat and eat more growing until these two black holes finally eat each, could a big bang happen in there ? study of dark matter dark energy is easily dismissed since we have so much of it .but the study of black holes and how they grow with that mystery about them. everything seem to be going in all directions it's growing because fast moving fast soon they say it should stop. everything we know about blackholes and the lesser we know about dark matter dark energy, time gravity in a blackhole seems easier then trying to understand our limited understanding of physics.

  • @jamesbrower418

    @jamesbrower418

    8 жыл бұрын

    there seems to an agreement between these guys but there hitting there own theories agree and start a new one..... E=MC can only work in a last great blackhole singularity gravity time starts life begins more possibly dang lost myself again.

  • @jamesbrower418

    @jamesbrower418

    8 жыл бұрын

    +James Brower they build a particle collider looking down to the nothing theory.

  • @pewpew7
    @pewpew73 жыл бұрын

    Yes there is a unified simple explanation And I strongly believe that I can find it But It seems I can't as I have to earn To survive 😭 in this Human dumb world rather than finding answers!🥺

  • @Godakuri

    @Godakuri

    3 жыл бұрын

    Wtf are you talking about

  • @mikegoldthwaite4331
    @mikegoldthwaite43312 жыл бұрын

    The very last comment...."re-wiring the brain usually involves abstratic mathematics" should be taken with a grain of salt, A math equation doodled on a knapkin or peice of paper will never "represent" the present moment---in time (see Time Reborn by Lee Smolin), because time itself is a biological experiencial side effect of "being alive". I've read The Foundation Trilogy (Isaac Asimov), so no-thanks; been there and done that!

  • @NocturnalJin
    @NocturnalJin9 жыл бұрын

    Dr. Gates: Astronomers let the Universe run the experiments. All they have to do is kick back and handle the observation part.

  • @thekaiser4333
    @thekaiser43335 жыл бұрын

    Predicting is not understanding.

  • @jakelabete7412

    @jakelabete7412

    4 жыл бұрын

    If you truly 'understand' you should be able to 'predict' and if you can predict then understanding is not far behind.

  • @92587wayne
    @92587wayne2 жыл бұрын

    Four-Dimensional Space. The whole. of Reality is born of a Single Reality, a quantum particle, that has a dual quality. Space is a great Void, 0, is simply the holding place for the Reality of everything. to include Time and motion. the whole of Time being born of the Zero Hour, the motion as a totality is motionless, is geodesic in nature. There is but a single Universe although there are many parts. Unity, symmetry, existed only prior to the moment of Creation. Before Creation, the Universe was without form and Void, there being only Darkness upon the Deep. The Universe is Four-dimensional; you can not leave out geodesic motion as a dimension in Space.

  • @user-gp6od8yp4q
    @user-gp6od8yp4q8 жыл бұрын

    #Любая система действует до тех пор,пока она может соответствовать уровню данного общества поддержания самой системы,как необходимость некого обоснования интеллекта развития либо прошлого,либо настоящего....но обязательной цели т.н.,,сравнения" точки отсчёта!!!.Это полностью губительная технология,ибо в ней содержится обязательная передача сочетанного уровня самого доступа мозга...!!!!.Это понятно???!.Вся система,может соотносится к уровню законов Жизни,только при условии СООТВЕТСТВИЯ УРОВНЯ САМОЙ СИСТЕМЫ В МОЗГЕ ПЕРЕДАЧИ,КАК ПРИЕМА,ТАК И ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЯ ЦЕПИ ИНФОРМАЦ.ЭП СИНТЕЗА!!!.НИКТО,НИКОГДА НЕ ЗАНИМАЛСЯ МОЗГОМ,КАК ДОЛЖНО....СИСТЕМУ НЕЛЬЗЯ СОРТИРОВАТЬ...НАУКА ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТ НЕ УРОВЕНЬ ОБСУЖДЕНИЯ ПРОШЛОГО,А СООТВЕТСТВИЕ ПАРАМЕТРАМ КВАНТ/МАТЕМАТ.СИНТЕЗА УРОВНЮ ДОСТУПА ПОГЛАЩЕНИЯ САМОГО МОЗГА ЭП,НО НИКАК РАЗРЫВА...МЕЖДУ МОЗГОМ И Т.Н.НАУКИ,ИБО САМ МОЗГ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТ ВЫШЕСКАЗАННОЕ,ЛИБО УНИЧТОЖАЕТ...#zZz#.

  • @Gringohuevon

    @Gringohuevon

    6 жыл бұрын

    Rubbish!

  • @reishane8846
    @reishane88465 жыл бұрын

    what explanation could be ultimate? it must be an explanation that you can not ask why. then simply imagine a explanation (whatever you wanna call it) which you can not ask the reason for it to exist then it must be the ultimate explanation we are looking for! no experiment needed no mathematical problems puzzle solved dismiss lol

  • @loverbite1
    @loverbite18 жыл бұрын

    At least Einstein understood what the limits were...but these guys aren't Einstein right? ...

  • @Ma7m9d
    @Ma7m9d9 жыл бұрын

    well.. 50 yrs later, and nothing much changed..so, intuitively, either one of the two theories is wrong!..or both are wrong!

  • @tonytafoya6217
    @tonytafoya62173 жыл бұрын

    Not Swiss cheese or pasta. It's styrofoam.

  • @vinceanthony7046
    @vinceanthony70468 жыл бұрын

    What missing is a true explaination of how gravity works.

  • @kingmeeko1
    @kingmeeko17 жыл бұрын

    Dr. Gates, Nikola Tesla has the patent for the radio!

  • @Oneffunes
    @Oneffunes9 жыл бұрын

    Two different places at the same time. ( II Corinthians 12:2 ) The spirit of truth was in time an Eternity simultaneously some 14 years ago And what makes this possible the rings,the beginning and the end. But The first is in the middle of the end and the last is in the middle of the beginning this is Ezeklels 1:17-18 A Wheel in the middle of a Wheel. This structure is in everything and everything is within it, the universe and The spirit universe, The physical world and the spirit world, quantum particles and spirit quantum particles. Everything in Alpha has a Spirit counterpart in Omega. One may say what would it be like to be in multiple places at the same time? You would be looking at space time matter while seeing The spirit of space-time matter within yourself. They would have to be offset the one to the other or you could not tell the difference of being in time or eternity. And one could say how would your consciousness handle your body being delocalized in space? Your consciousness can handle it, it is your brain that would have the problem. There would have to be a team of neural connections in the brain that would be able to cope with this problem. Or You would be stuck between time and eternity not having the ability to move. You would be trying to move as if you were in Space time matter but it doesn't operate that way. You would have to operate the structure manually in The spirit of your mind in order to function, you would not even be able to breath! you would have to consciously breath for your physical body while in your spirit body or you would die.

  • @JohnFHendry

    @JohnFHendry

    9 жыл бұрын

    Demetrius Anderson Space is relative to time, even two slits for a photon or electron to go through have a place in space/time and do not exist at the same time relative to the observer/electron. One slit is on the left, and one slit is on the right. So an electron going through both slits is not going through both at exactly the same time any more than a car that drives past First and Second street does so at the same time. The difference in scale makes the atomic world hard to see but as Einstein said it behaves the same in objecting to the uncertainty principle before the value of weak force asymmetry was known needed to measure with on the atomic scale after establishing a true or "initial" inertial frame of reference to measure from.

  • @chrisgazda8067
    @chrisgazda80679 жыл бұрын

    I think I have an idea about quantim physics everything is at one place at all times called a singularity when you think that you transported a part off a protron to a different place in time you really diddint maybe 11 kilometers away it is in the same place at all times its not this that is spooky what is spooky is I think that it is space time that is spookey thank you quantim physics I also think this is crazy but it only makes sense ps nothing moves faster than the speed of light unless you never moved might take 1000 years to figger this out with a quantim computer

  • @Funnygalsproductions
    @Funnygalsproductions7 жыл бұрын

    Pentagram theory? Mmmm , I think he been bought

  • @stoneway2455
    @stoneway24558 жыл бұрын

    did he have to say "3rd leg of an ant"?

  • @margueritehudsell4454
    @margueritehudsell44543 жыл бұрын

    If this Unified Theory is ever found, we will prove and disprove God simultaneously. Maybe that's my SciPhy fun side.

  • @margueritehudsell4454

    @margueritehudsell4454

    3 жыл бұрын

    I discovered physics very late in life.

  • @marucalopez258
    @marucalopez2582 жыл бұрын

    🚬⚡⚡⚡⚡🚀

  • @user-sv9yk2vy4d
    @user-sv9yk2vy4d Жыл бұрын

    アインシュタインの特殊相対性理論は間違いやのに、それを超える?もっと無茶苦茶な理論か??

  • @AsratMengesha
    @AsratMengesha9 жыл бұрын

    No, body can describe nature unless he/she can describe, what matter and energy is made of. If He/She says the world is made of from nothing, she/he must describe what that nothing is made of. Once she did that then she/he can formulate theory of everything. Right? thanks.

  • @chrisgazda8067

    @chrisgazda8067

    9 жыл бұрын

    didn't said its made from nothing what do you think

  • @chrisgazda8067

    @chrisgazda8067

    9 жыл бұрын

    chris gazda my quest for learning but I have an interesting idea

  • @chrisgazda8067

    @chrisgazda8067

    9 жыл бұрын

    chris gazda this might sound weak but I am still trying to bring black holes into this it is

  • @AsratMengesha

    @AsratMengesha

    9 жыл бұрын

    chris gazda Black holes are not not matter and energy as you thought. don't you follow the news? all the physics lows break down in black holes. Got it? Any way, thanks, you are a very good man, keep it up and don't get confused, because you are not the only forced to live in this universe for a while, regardless what power and energy you have, and black holes don't have. Just keep them in this. it is...Right?

  • @JohnFHendry

    @JohnFHendry

    9 жыл бұрын

    Good starting point of awareness. The equation above shows "information frame" formation is a concept of opposites created relative to time adding a reverse arrow needed to move energy back and forth as a pendulum and starts with Mass/something creating it's opposite "nothing". Because it deals with E energy, and E cannot be reduced or go away it must be transferred into another "room" of time T called the strong force where "in equal time" it goes back into the "room" W where it came from. W is one size, T gets bigger. Space is relative to time. If you have little physics background then you are lucky as it is so simple it can be blinding. It's far better go through it intellectually before trying to add numbers so you can see what you are doing. It's a clock that creates atoms of 4 phases/parts in T. It created the symbol {a} now being used. Imagine a lever, {a} is where you put the fulcrum in time between past and future. The ratio keeps changing and has no arrow. It'll rip your head off due to the symmetry but I can see you already starting to think in the right direction. But the right direction has an opposite direction, a phase in time, and one follows the other with the Observer always in the middle. There is no Mass outside of W. Matter is made of time.

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert90183 жыл бұрын

    Vo sne som videl iní vesmír

Келесі