Since Nature photography is included here. The 90mm Macro should be considered. It’s one of the best macros ever made.

@joakimolsson1024

4 жыл бұрын

I have to disagree. Sure it is very sharp but that is not all that matters. Focus throw is way to narrow, and the steps provided by the focus by wire are too big. Mechanical focus and a wider focus throw would make this a much better macro lens. With my old macro lens i could focus stack near MFD just using the focus ring. With the Sony i need to add a focusing rail to get good results. No deal breaker i guess, but still adds that i need to bring a tripod and rail, and i had hoped the lens would be more made for macro and not macro + general photography (which is why the focus throw/focus by wire is like this, i guess).

@lamalinde8037

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/qX5mz9Gnaai0aNo.html

@bluecheese20401

3 жыл бұрын

I totally agree. It's an exceptional lens

@andrewbowman409

2 жыл бұрын

@@joakimolsson1024 most people would agree that the 90mm macro is one of the best nature lenses. I don’t know who you talk to that says otherwise.

@joakimolsson1024

2 жыл бұрын

@@andrewbowman409 for me it's a great lens, not one of the best ever made. I sold mine because of the annoying manual focus.

I cant believe i watched whole 45 minutes of the video without skipping a minute of it. THATS CALLED THE REAL REVIEW. THANK YOU.

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

Wow, thanks!

I’d say you have the best breakdown on KZread at the moment. Thanks for that.

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

thanks so much!!!!

Just bought the 200-600. Thank you for your help. I am a hobby photographer and wow did this do a great job of outlining the current lineup.

Patrick, thank you for making this video. Really do appreciate it.

Two years later! Excellent video thank you. Most informative.

Really great video. Appreciate you making it👍🏽

I thought I was going to skip through this but here I am 47 minutes later typing this, and I'm not even in the market for those two big boys on the right! Great presentation.

@PMRTV

Жыл бұрын

thanks so much Matt!!!

Really enjoy your videos. Always comes across as someone who knows the product and lot of experience.

Great and helpful info as always!

Great and thorough information. My wife and I booked a vacation to Cabo for this October. We realized after watching KZread videos about Cabo that we would be well served to invest in a good camera. So after reviewing what's out there, we settled for an a6000. We have been loving learning photography, and of course now it's all about the glass. Thanks for this very useful review!!! God bless!

Great work Patrick, I got the 400 f2.8 a few weeks ago and am blown away, super happy with it

Great video Patrick, you are very kind man!

You did great with this video. One of the best comparisons I’ve watched for a wile now, I have the 100-400 and love it. The lengthy video was well worth it. THANK YOU

@PMRTV

2 жыл бұрын

Awesome, thank you!

As you know Patrick I am not afraid to moan when I don't like a video but this is an AWESOME video. You've really covered so much and its really helpful for those of us looking to invest in Sony kit. Thanks for taking the time to put this together. I still hope Sony launch a 300 2.8 in the not too distant future...

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

agreed on all points!

Great video, thank you sir!

@PMRTV

Жыл бұрын

thanks much!!!!!

200600 will be my upcoming gift in the next week

Incredibly comprehensive and helped me make a decision on the Sony FE 200-600mm f5.6-6.3 G OSS Lens. Cheers!

your content is so great. infomrative, calm, objective opintions....no annoying music. keep doing whatr you're doing and thanks for sharing all your wisdom

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

You made my day Hanni!!! Your comment makes up for at least 10 trolls, LOL. thank you so much!!! pm-r :)

Thx you for this, felt like you were always making sense

@PMRTV

2 жыл бұрын

Glad to hear it

Just fantastic thank you very much . Just ordered the 600 F4 GM

A very in depth review. Thank you for explaining them in details along with the experiences of using them

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

My pleasure!

Great quote referring to his 100-400mm lens ‘you don’t want to go to a game with this thing because it doesn’t make you look like a real photographer’ !!!

Thanks for your sincere and honest opinions!

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

Always!

What a phenomenal video, thank you.

@PMRTV

2 жыл бұрын

thanks so much!!!

Great work! ....thank you very much! ...just purchased the 200-600 and it is amazing as you say, and at the price point, a no-brainer.

@CamillaI

4 жыл бұрын

Yes just going to review it soon awesome bit of glass enjoy

I got in a bit late on the preorders for the 200-600 but i cant wait to use it on my a6400.

A great review!!! I’m still using my Tamron 150-600mm w/ the MC11 and it works, but I’m ready to sell it and the three other Tamron/Canon lenses and get that transition over with. I’ve been holding onto some of my Canon gear just because it was my buddy for a long time... but it’s over. I don’t use the 150-600 a lot but when I do it’s so worth it. With the Covid issue and no live events, I certainly have time to wait for one to be in stock. But I think it’s time to finally let go of the Canon side completely. I can’t see ever going back, and can’t imaging having to replace lenses yet again. Thank you for this review, it was far more valuable than you think.

great video ! thanks

Sooo helpful! Thanks!

Thanks so much for a very informative video!!

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

you bet, Chris!!!

Two weeks ago, I part exchanged my 100 - 400mm G Master + SEL20TC for a 200 - 600mm + SEL14TC. Unfortunately, the weather has not been ideal of late, but I did get out with my A9 + 200 - 600mm for five hours a couple of days ago. What I can state so far is: as a wildlife photographer, the 200 - 600mm matches my expectations and produces the results I had hoped for. I managed to capture a Swallow in flight just above the ground, a Dragonfly in flight, just above the ground, a Hover Fly, in flight at a distance of about 3 metres and a Magpie in flight against a tree cluttered background. Focusing speed and lock on are exceptionally fast and zooming between 200 to 600 is really quick. I have yet to test it out with my SEL14TC or my Kenko extension tubes, but so far I am impressed. I will also have to test it out with my A7III at some stage; but that is not a priority. Top job Sony.

@trippalhealicks

4 жыл бұрын

So, so far you're happy with the switch? Does the focusing speed on the 200-600 match the 100-400?

@klackon1

4 жыл бұрын

@@trippalhealicks. It is so fast that it does not matter. Sony has used the older dirve in the 200 - 600mm; but it is still blindingly fast. Other than in a timed, side by side, comparison there is no way of really determining the difference in real world photography.

Wow. Thank you for the depth of this video. I’ve been going back and forth between the 200-600 and the 100-400, and it looks like I’m going with the 200-600! Thanks for all the info! I have the 85 prime (and I think I’ll keep it after watching this!)

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

Cool, if you want to help me out, use my affiliate link to purchase from Bedfords and use the PMR code to get 5% off anything you buy from them and get no tax/shipping: www.bedfords.com/27242916111 (as of 1-29-21, it's $q00 off so you should get it for just $1803.10!!!!

Fantastic info. Thank you

Very happy to stumble across this video. I primarily do video/photo for live bands in small venues and have loved the 24mm 1.4 GM and 24-105mm F4 G for that purpose, but as I'm looking to get into college sports I feel like the 200-600 and 135mm are going to make an amazing combo.

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

absolutely!!! we all keep hoping for a 300mm f/2.8GM or a 300mm f/4G!!!!

@lamalinde8037

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/qX5mz9Gnaai0aNo.html

This is great, I have been waiting for you to do this. I have 4 of these lens, including the 200-600mm. I agree with your comments about the 100-400mm with a x1.4. I almost did not buy the 200-600mm, but then I see it as a 400-600mm lens and more with the x1.4. Also love the T shirt!

Thanks Pat great job.👍🏽

Thanks for this video, it's so helpful! Your knowledge and experience came off naturally and you made clear the benefits and purpose of each lens and focal length. I was planning to get the 100-400mm (I used the 70-200 F/4 at the Chicago Air and Water Show and I enjoyed it but wished I had more reach... but I mostly shoot autocross) but your talking about the logarithmic increase every 100mm and the new galaxy of bokeh has me curious about how 400-600mm looks.

You're prediction was right, the 200-600 is still pretty consistently sold out to this day on both Sony's website and other retailers. Just finally got my hands on one at Best Buy for a good price and I can't wait to try it out. Thanks for the video, great stuff!

Nice job Pat. Your recommendations have been spot on for me. Sold my last piece of Nikon gear last month. The 100-400 breezed through spring sports and I expect it to do the same this fall. I love lenses that make money every time I pick them up!

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

As good as the 400GM and 600GM's are, I'm glad Sony put priority into making the 100-400 a GM lens also...

GREAT VIDEO! VERY GOOD JOB!

Having followed bloggers and vloggers for years it's rare for me to be surprised. But I was here. Even if I'm not half interested in the lenses (I am when I dream but..) Very nice walkthrough. Thumps up and thanks for a pleasant time. Just got the 200-600 btw 🙂

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

I appreciate that!

Great review

Mark Smith shoots birds with a 600F4. He really shows what that lens can do. Great video!!! Thank you!

Amazing Video... This was so informative... Thank you

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

You're so welcome!

Super helpfull, thank you!

@PMRTV

11 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

Thank you Patrick. Exactly what i needed. I've been working as a photojournalist, doing lot of sport phoography, mainly athletics. I've been using Nikons, buts since they seem to lost the MILC battle, i've been thinking seriously to move on to SONY system. So you gave me a very good starting point on which leneses i should concentrate on. Thank you!

@PMRTV

11 ай бұрын

cool! I wish you luck in the switch!!!

Thank you for your video really it help me, I just ordered a9ii + 200600, included 70200GM & 2470GM, Im very happy with my decision 👍👍👍

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

Great to hear! Be sure to check out my menu video on the a9II so you put your best foot forward as you begin with Sony. Also, welcome home!

I got the 400 f2.8 is sensational! i love it

Own the “street sweeper” Love this lens.Its a powerhouse.

Thank you for your great video.

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

So nice of you

The 200-600 will be mine as soon as I sell some older gear! Great review!

@PMRTV

Жыл бұрын

hey thanks! I think you will really like it. I have other videos about that lens since I recorded this video--feel free to find them and watch more content :)

Great video I like the no bs. I ended up ordering a 200-600. Thanks

@PMRTV

Жыл бұрын

awesome!!!

Thank you!

Nice! That 200-600 has my name on it :D

P M-R, your best vid yet! Packed with insightful information. I felt like I bumped into you at a hotel and we went out to the local watering hole to talk about glass and I walked (stumbled?) home with a bunch of insider information. One of these days I'll switch from Canon to Sony...dunno know if it will be the A7RIV or A9II. But darn you as I always thought my first three lenses would be the Holy Trinity. Now you got me salivating over the 135, 100-400 and 200-600. I guess what it boils down to is what do you envision yourself shooting. As a hobbyist, I shoot every genre, day and night. Thank you for your honest and candid thoughts, both in the video and in the comments. I'm sure once I dive in I'll watch this vid half a dozen times. Actually, I do have a question: in what order do you think they'll make the Mark II version and what about it will be different? Say, the first three MII lenses.

Great and very informative video! I just wish there were some sample photos thrown in so we have examples to look at ;)

Thank you so much , you help me a dicision making. 100-400 & 200-600 mm on an a 6600 ! Bird watching and some little animals are my FAVO ! Thanks, Frits from Thailand.

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

Glad I could help!

Excellent review. 💯

@PMRTV

3 ай бұрын

Much appreciated, but there is a much newer video here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pKKT0ZaBiMXdiMY.html

Great video/info, what are your thoughts with the 200-600 and the a7R lll

Patrick, your videos have all been an incredible resource for me as an aspiring event/sports shooter. My journey with Sony started with this video. I have probably watched it over 20 times! I've rented the 135gm and LOVED it. I'm trying to convince myself I need that lens (even though I own the workhorse 70-200gm ii). I would love a video showcasing some of your favorite sports images (especially High School) where you used specific lenses to achieve the shots you were anticipating/looking for. My favorite combo for basketball is the 70-200/35gm, however I'd love to find instances where I can use the 135. Thanks again!

@PMRTV

Жыл бұрын

the 135GM is stellar for shooting in high school gyms... volleyball, basketball, wrestling, etc...

@k_c_t_photography

Жыл бұрын

@@PMRTV appreciate the content you make on Sony Photography! I’m currently shooting semi-pro soccer, and I’m wanting to invest in more Sony lenses, now I’ve been looking at the tamron lenses as well to figure out which lens I should invest in next. I’ve debated between the Sony 70-200 F4, the Tamron 70-180 f2.8, and the 70-200 f2.8 Version 2. I want more reach but I also need better low light performance, price is being considered and I can’t figure which way to go. Considering I’m trying to switch from a Nikon D3400 crop camera with a 70-300 4.5-6.3 to using my Sony A7II with a new full frame telephoto lens. What would you suggest and why? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you

such great info

I got my Sony 200-600mm delivered here in Shanghai about a week ago. Oh boy, what a performance on my Sony A9. And even when paired with the Sony A6400 this lens shines - this combo works much better than the 100-400mm paired with the A6400. For Wildlife this 200-600mm zoom is clearly a winner.

@eosuser1

4 жыл бұрын

Stefan1968ful have you been able to compare the 100-400GM with 1.4TC vs 200-600 in terms of sharpness and focus speed/tracking. I have A9, 1.4 and 100-400...wondering if it’s worth getting the 200-600 for field sports. Thx

@Stefan1968ful

4 жыл бұрын

@@eosuser1 Hi, I used the 100-400mm with the 1.4 TC before I purchased the 200-600mm. And I was not impressed. The f-stop goes down to f/8 at the long end. So compared to the 200-600mm you lose another half a stop. Plus, the 100-400mm without TC may be a bit sharper than the 200-600mm but this is definitely no longer the case when you add the Teleconverter. And another point: for whatever reason, the Sony A6400 performs better in terms of IQ on the 200-600mm compared to the 100-400mm - this is just my observation. So I am going to sell the 100-400mm.

@MannyG32968

4 жыл бұрын

Stefan1968ful my thoughts exactly sir!

Just got my A9. Was up in the air on what long lens to get. Had picked the 200-600 and I am glad I did. Pulling the pin tonight. Thanks

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

Good stuff! Enjoy the lens!!!!

Good explanation of all these nice lenses, take one according to your budget!

Not to mention, the 100-400 connected to the a7rii or the new a7riv, going to crop mode you're getting 150mm-600mm at 5.6 (I typically just set the aperture at 5.6 so it stays constant). Of course, I haven't done this yet, but possibly getting the a7riii soon. I am currently doing this with the a7iii, but obviously the file size isn't a large, still usable though!

lovely thanks

This video helped so much, after tossing up on what to buy out of the 100-400 and 200-600, I ended up going with the 100-400, I rented the 200-600 and 80% of my shots were under 400mm so figured I may as well get the better lens if it suits me which is also smaller, more lightweight and the extra stop of light is really needed in the UK where is always cloudy when shooting pet parrots in flight. Great video.

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

great, glad it was helpful!

"If you don't know what I'm talking about, don't worry about it" laughed my ass off there... thanks.. : D

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

glad you enjoyed the comment... ;)

Personally, I bought the 100-400 a few weeks before Sony announced the 200-600. I’m kinda glad it worked out that way because I’d be tempted by the price and the range on the 200-600, but I would probably not like the size and weight. Having rented the 100-400 before I was blown away by the GM resolution, build quality, speed, and even things like the color rendition that seemed better. I think I’m going to get the 1.4X teleconverter for it to make it a 140-560mm f/6.3 to f/8, which isn’t too far off from the 200-600 with a lot note versatility. I’ll be shooting with the 1.4X outside in the sun most of the time anyway.

Another great video! I am going on a family trip to Hawaii soon and am planning on shooting some North Shore surfing. I have an a7RIV and was going to use my 20-200 GM with a 2X tele in crop mode to get the range. I am concerned that it still won't be enough so am thinking about renting a 100-400 with a 1.4 tele instead. I only have room for one larger lens in the bag (can't fit a 200-600 ). How do you think a 100-400 with 1.4 X would compare sharpness-wise (etc) to a 70-200 with a 2X for surf shots and general tele use? I'll have a 16-35 GM for my walking-around lens.Thanks!!

Great, really great video. The 200-600 G is a phenomenal lens (and now the mark ii 70-200 GM is unstoppable). I use both lenses with the 1.4x Tele, and both the 1.4x and 2x Tele on the 70-200 GM II. Oh, and I love my 135 GM and the 50 1.2 GM.

@PMRTV

2 жыл бұрын

yes!!!

@FastCubeMaster

Жыл бұрын

how is the 2x teleconverter with the 70-200 GM II? have you shot video on it?

I shoot wildlife and pre-ordered the 200-600 almost as soon as it was available to do so. I agree that it will be very popular. I had a Sigma 150-600 C when I shot Canon (and I used it a bit with my a7r3, my first Sony camera) but I found the AF was slow and hunted too much once I switched to Sony and was using it with the MC-11 adapter. So I sold it as part of my switch over. I'm really excited to get this lens, essentially the same as the Sigma with the big added benefit of being a native Sony with more updated tech features. Great vid!

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

native is best, but I sure made a lot of nice images with my 120-300 Sport and 500mm f/4 Sport lenses...

@emacandhedwig382

4 жыл бұрын

​@@PMRTV Yes, no issues with IQ! :)

@CarlosBarronJr

4 жыл бұрын

I would love to see a 200-600 vs 400 GM VS 600 GM review / comparison video for wildlife!

@emacandhedwig382

4 жыл бұрын

@@CarlosBarronJr I'll see what I can do, though might be the 400 f2.8 instead of the 600 since I own the 400. Just did an unboxing vid for my 200-600, you can check it out on my channel! Patrick is right though...I want that 600 f4 GM, lol.

Great video. Im tossed between the 100-400 and the 200-600... Im pretty certain ill do the 200-600 for the extra reach. But a great video...Cheers

This video was not confusing at all and went into great details that anyone considering these lenses would want to know. I do have a short question however, I own the 100-400 and also the 1.4 cony TC. Having used the 1.4 on the lens I wasn't exactly happy with the results but I'm wondering if the camera is a factor, I'm using the Sony A7R3 not the A9. I found I'd rather just use the 100-400 and crop rather than add the 1.4 in nearly every situation. Would this be a different scenario with a camera like the the A9? My next body will be the A9 or A9ii for sure. Thanks once again for a very helpful video, liked and subscribed.

Great video! Anyone have any suggestions as to whether the 100-400 or 200-600 would be better paired with the new Sony FX30, for wildlife videography?

Talking about the 400 and 600 and your preference for the 600, for me the advent of the a7RIV 61 megapixels definitely make me stay with the 400 due to the 1.5X cropped image giving me a 600 mm and about 21 megapixels file (a file almost as big as with he a9 not cropped). I always try to get as close as possible to the subjects and seldom use the 1.4X but if I do, it will have a 840 mm f 5.6. The a7RIV is an awesome wildlife camera although not as fast as the a9 but he AF capabilities are close; I use both.

You are awesome brother❤

@PMRTV

5 ай бұрын

Thank you so much 😀

Great overview of this lovely glass. As you said the 200-600 and say an a6400 makes a great relatively low cost wildlife outfit with crazy range. I had the Nikon 400f2.8fl and the Nikon 600mm f4 vr, these latest offerings from Sony are so light virtually half the weight which as you say makes a world of difference especially if using them all day. cheers. I Guess we'd all have one of each if money wasn't an issue. cheers.

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, exactly

Hey Patrick, loved the vid. Where can I find that T-Shirt?

Awesome video! Curious what sports you use the 135 for? Would you consider the 135 overlap if I already have the 70-200? Camera is A9ii.

@PMRTV

3 жыл бұрын

I use my 135GM for hoops, volleyball, baseball (1st base divebacks), portraits, tennis (at the net), etc...

Got the 100 to 400 G Master on your recommendation from one of your original videos, have it on my a 6500 virtually all the time. It is a phenomenal lens for Birds, Sports, and even macro photography. I haven't yet put an extension tube on it but would like to try that as well. Thanks for your recommendations and this grade recap. Might have to think about that 200 to 600 for birds.

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

great! glad you enjoy it. The 200-600 is gathering a loyal following as people buy and use it... It's nice to have so many options now, as Sony shooters!!!!

Great Review ! that 200-600mm is great , the light weight , the internal zoom, the AF , the looks...... it can be a 1200mm thats just mind blowing ..... I love it , my only complain would be that it becomes a 6.3 too soon , if it would be at least 5.6 at 400mm would be great or all the way ! why not ! lol ---- Besides all that the 400mm F2.8 does everything well.

@PMRTV

2 жыл бұрын

I agree, I wish it changed at 400mm, but hey, it's still a killer optic for the $$.

Thank you for taking the time to make this detailed video. I’m considering the 200-600 for motorsport. I was wondering how good the autofocus accuracy is ? I’m currently using an A9ii and my lens kit also includes a 100-400 GM.

@lamalinde8037

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/qX5mz9Gnaai0aNo.html

I can verify your comments about the 100-400 GM. I shot the moon with an A7R4 and the 100-400 + 1.4x tele and every shot came out - HAND HELD. I had tried this with all my Nikons over the years and rarely had what I considered a good shot. Great video in covering the main points and uses.

@wayneevans9364

4 жыл бұрын

Are you comparing the new state of the art A7R4 with old Nikon's, what lenses did you have? That's not a good comparison.

@thomasnewsom6084

4 жыл бұрын

@@wayneevans9364 I have both the Z6 and Z7 still (having sold my D850 and D500). I have both F and new Z lenses (at least as many as they have managed to ship. The purpose of my comment was not really to compare Nikon and Sony from the stand point of better or best but a simple statement that for me the A7R4 helped to do what I had trouble doing before. I am not a Sony or a Nikon bigot. I simply go where the tech helps me the most. For other people their mileage may vary.

@wayneevans9364

4 жыл бұрын

@@thomasnewsom6084 Thats good Thomas, thanks for your reply, Cheers.

Fantastic thorough review Patrick! That 200-600 is tempting. I already own the 100-400 which I love so it's tough to part with. I'm leaning towards the 400 f2.8 because with that 1.4 TC, I would be at 560 f4 which I'm good for because I can take the 1.4 tc off and have the option of 2.8. I'm into wildlife photography and there have been times later in the day and early where the light is challenging. As great as the A9's ability to handle low light, I'm currently using the 100-400 with the 1.4 which puts me at f8 :( BUT, IF Sony ever comes out with a 200-400 F4 with a 1.4 TC like Canon has, I would buy it in a heartbeat. Having that ability to zoom back for wildlife is something I enjoy now and I do worry about it. BUT (to contradict myself again), the bokey from an f2.8 or f4 is just WOW! To seperate the background is worth it - especially when my wife has green lit a purchase :)

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

A agree... with everything you said... LOL

I wish Sony released Sony 400mm f/2.8 with a built-in 1.4x teleconverter.

Great video, it actually didn't feel long :) I think another advantage of the 200-600g is that you can go back and forth between 200 and 600mm with a 90 degrees rotation, it looks almost instantaneous and effortless, I think it's a first for a telephoto lens. What do you think?

Bought the Sony 600mm F4 about a week ago, can't complain, it's an awesome lens for wildife :-)

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

oh yeah!!!!

Terrific video. I am lucky to have most of these lenses except for the 600. I shot lots of motorsports and your comments were very helpful. You mentioned monopods so I am curious which brands do you recommend. Thankmyou.

@PMRTV

2 жыл бұрын

amzn.to/3gNTiLw

@drjedbest

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you

I so enjoyed your talk on all the lenses, I'm waiting for my 200-600mm to arrive, at the moment I have an a6000 you mentioned it on your talk, I was wondering to upgrade my camera or will my a6000 be ok?

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

While the a6000 is still a relavant camera today when you compare its sepcs and performance to the Canon 7DMII and other DSLR's that are now almost ten years old, the a6000 does not fair well against the a6300, a6400, a6100, and a6600. All of these benefit much from the more modern sensor which gives much better low light performance than the venerable a6000. Having said all that, you can make amazing photos with the a6000 and it will work really well with your new lens which will actually be a 300-900mm zoom because it's made for FF sensors. You are going to LOVE it!!!

You can increase the equivalent focal length of the 70-200mm f/4 G by mounting it on a crop camera such as the A6600... That gives you an equivalent 105-300mm focal range...

Great vid! What would you pick for shooting swimming? To pair with either an A7RIV and A7SIII? I own both cameras and would like to have some advice between these

@PMRTV

2 жыл бұрын

if you are in sunny CA or FL, definitely the 200-600G but if you are inside, I'd go with the newer 70-200GMII for sure.

Thanks Patrick, quick question as I'm starting from scratch with Sony. What body and lens would you recommend for ringside boxing action shots?

Great review. If you are one of the people giving this a thumbs down, do yourself and everyone else a favor and find a "Glam Rock" or "Hollywood" review written by any of the hosts of CLOWN "influencers" who have never made a dime from photography. This is a great comparison/contrast session on several lenses at different price points for shooting sports from a top class photographer with a great portfolio and resume. Well done as always PMR!

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

thank you John!!! very nice of you to say so...

Hi Pat! Thank you for your great insights on Sony especially the 400mm f2.8 and the 600mm f4. I primarily shoot wildlife and nature now although I have shot for the better part of 15 years agility dogs and motor sports racing. I have done both of these professionally for publications and events on a pro level. Now, I mostly lead photo workshops to various parts of the world. My last two workshops I lead were to Tanzania. When not in Africa, I do a lot of BIF at home but I love shooting larger wildlife too. I sell some at local galleries, teach, and do critiques. I shoot with an A1 and an A7R3. Current long lens is the 200-600mm. I would like to move up to the 400 or the 600 but cannot afford both. I have the 1.4 teleconverter already so I can go with the 400 mm f2.8 and the 1.4 for 560mm or the 600mm f4 bare or with the 1.4. I don't typically shoot much above 600mm because I don't like the heat waves unless I can get out early enough. I follow Tin Man Lee and he leans towards the 400mm because of the extra stop of light. I want to focus on better backgrounds and earlier light as well as evening backlit shoots. Your argument for the 600mm is tugging me in that direction. I can't afford both. I was thinking of the 400mm to shoot with the 1.4 so that I could have a more versatile lens when I occasionally shot agility dogs and other arena sports. The hard decision point is that I shoot a lot more of birds and wildlife. Why not the 400mm with the 1.4 over the 600mm? I want cleaner backgrounds with as much amazing light as I can get, that is the direction I want for my art print photos. Thanks for any light you can shed on my choice. David

Great job and very helpful. I have the 70-200 f2.8 and was close to buying the 100-400, but held out long enough for the launch of the 200-600. Throw a question at you. What if you didn’t have the 400GM or 600GM and Sony launched a 500 f4 GM, would that be your “go to?” Of course the rumor mill is the 500 is on the table. Again, great video and thanks for putting in the time to do them.

@PMRTV

4 жыл бұрын

It's a great question. IMHO, the 500 f/4 matches up great to the 300mm f/2.8. You want to always space out your glass so there are big differences in focal length. Buying the 400GM set me up more for the 200mm f/2 (if they ever choose to make one) and the 600GM. But if you push me on it, I prefer the 600 f/4 over the 400 but it's just not versatile enough to justify. Back in the good old days at Sports Illustrated, I had them all (2/4/6 and even an 800mm f/5.6) but those days are over just like earning real money from shooting pro and college sports. If the 500mm f/4GM was made, I'd hold out for the 600GM.

Great video. I don't own any of these yet, but from what I've seen the 100-400 is also really good for closeup/semi-macro shooting when you want distance from the subject.

@lamalinde8037

3 жыл бұрын

It's perfect. 100-400 is wonderful. It's the same you get like in canon.

Hey Patrick! So I have a question that I'm sure you will know easy enough... I shoot action if dogs with the A9 and my 135 GM aswell as the 2-600. The photography side I am fine with, however... I am really struggling to nail focus IN VIDEO of fast moving subjects coming directly at the camera. It's as though the Focus just wont lock and hold onto my subjects face. Also... it's as though I cannot track moving subjects in video and still have access to the IS as I lose it when I focus. The camera stop tracking the dog but the IS kicks in. When i leave the camera to try track in wide without pressing anything, it tries to track the dog but there is no IS kicking in. If you were to video fast moving subjects coming directly at you, what would your settings look like? Maybe I am asking a bit much of the A9 I have no idea. Maybe I need an A1 to achieve this, which is fine as its my next camera upgrade. Keep up the great work bro