🌏 Get Exclusive NordVPN deal here ➡ nordvpn.com/kingsandgenerals. It's risk-free with Nord's 30-day money-back guarantee! ✌

@mehmetozkan1276

2 жыл бұрын

Can you make long Turkish war

@memorymeme51

2 жыл бұрын

It will be more needed for russians now more than ever

@primitiveplanet8202

2 жыл бұрын

More than Alexander being a genius, fact is that Darius the third was not a worthy ruler. Had this been Cyrus the great or Darius the first, they had hanged ALexander from some tree. It is easy to win when the king on the other side has a tendency to run. The same happened with the mongols. Mohammad kharazmshah ,who was not an ethnic Iranian by the way, ran for his life and collapsed his army. Giving the victory to Chengiz.

@primitiveplanet8202

2 жыл бұрын

@@ibashcommunists6847 They probably weren't even 100 000 soldiers. You need to understand logistics. how difficult it is to prepare food, water etc for such a large number. They didn't have trucks or trains or any modern machinery back then. Also no can food or refrigerating. 100 000 soldiers is a lot of people to feed if you have the technology of 25 centuries ago.

@velstadtvonausterlitz2338

2 жыл бұрын

Alexander is nothing without parmenion! Always remember the betrayed general! Alexander rewarded his loyalty with betrayal! Alexander will never be great in my eyes! He's nothing but a despot whose ego is more important to him than his kingdom, his people, and even his friends and family! What an overrated individual!

This is one of the most decisive battles in human history. Even to this day Alexander's battle tactics are studied by modern generals. He was an absolute genius

@MrGentilushi

2 жыл бұрын

Alexander had more luck rather than skills regarding this battle. Darius failed to harass Alexander's long line of supply and during the battle failed to secure his flanks which should be easy with the numbers he had

@y.r._

2 жыл бұрын

@asahi toki I think Khalid ibn al Walid is equally overrated. He had high quality nomad troops against mostly raw recruits, as most experienced men of both persia and rome had perished shortly before in Heraclius' war against the persians, which had cost both sides hundreds of thousands of men, had devastated their territories, left them open for invasions from the north and destabilized their own political order. Khalid ibn al Walid was with no doubt a great general, but in fact, I think that Heraclius himself was an even more capable commander, having fought entire campaigns that were much more unfavourable, while Khalid could rely on the high quality and fanaticism of his men as well as the fact that the muslims were willing to send every single man of the arabian peninsula into the slaughter. Khalid came out of nowhere and he basically took the romans and persians by surprise during exactly the right time, when both were so weak - and unable to coordinate with each other against the threat, due to their deep animosities against each other - and distracted that they couldn't put up much of a fight anyway. Against Justinians legions, Khalid and the arabs would have been trashed in a matter of months, becoming merely a footnote in history.

@y.r._

2 жыл бұрын

@@Zeerich-yx9po Wrong. Modern generals still read Sun Tsu and follow his philosophies of war in a detailed fashion. Napoleon himself said it... Read of Alexander, Caesar, of all the great generals of ancient times, otherwise you cannot be a great military leader yourself. That does not mean "copy their tactics". It means; Take inspiration from the approaches they take, from the mind games, from their ethics as warriors and the way they lead their armies in a psychological/philosophycal way. Granted, Alexander is a pretty bad example, because he really wasn't a great innovator or something. He was cunning, daring, fast and very brave, but that could turn to your disadvantage very quickly if you find yourself in a situation where caution would be wiser. Exactly that is to be learned from Alexanders campaigns; If there is a favourable moment, do not let it pass, but seize it. Which is exactly what Napoleon did at Austerlitz, for example, while at Friedland, he pulled a Caesar by holding back his reserves, feeding men into the fight at a steady pace and thus strangulating the enemy to death by pressure. The basic truths of warfare don't change. Tactics change every few decades, that was true even in the ancient world, but there still always is much to be learned from any victory and defeat.

@ninjaa6952

2 жыл бұрын

@asahi toki haha the old the persians where weak excuse they where in their prime heavely outnumbered alexander and he still won. Khalid is overrated asf and most of the battle numbers are completely exaggerated by Muslim historians. Why say one person's victories are overrated and the other isn't when both have been exaggerated by historians.

@ninjaa6952

2 жыл бұрын

@@DavorBa They are just bias bro most of them are iranians or from the middle East they wouldn't say cyrus or khalid is overrated its always anyone who's decisivly defeated them that's overrated.

I love Alexander's reply to Darius' message when he said they should have peace: “Your ancestors invaded Macedonia, and the rest of Greece, and did us harm. Although we had not done you any previous injury. Your envoys corrupted my men and sought to destroy the peace which I established amongst the Greeks. “You killed Arses with the help of Bagoas and gained your throne through unjust means in defiance of Persian custom. In the future, whenever you communicate with me, send to me as the King of Asia - do not write to me as an equal.”

@qaidikramuddin

2 жыл бұрын

I love this great response also; this part in particular, “In the future, whenever you communicate with me, send to me as the King of Asia - do not write to me as an equal.”

@YeeeeGreg

2 жыл бұрын

That’s awesome, thank you for adding that to the comments!

@phoenixedits8960

2 жыл бұрын

Powerful reply

@Voivod23

2 жыл бұрын

Made the video 200% better

@zamzamazawarma928

2 жыл бұрын

Those are Arrian's words, the exact phrasing is probably not authentic, but conveys the gist of the letter.

The culmination of the Hammer and Anvil Macedonian deadly stroke. This was Alexander's biggest gamble, and it was pretty close. The Victory at Gaugamela made Alexander the de-facto King of Persia, and changed the course of ancient history til the rise of Rome.

@klaudioabazi4478

2 жыл бұрын

@LeoTheBritish-Eurasian Of Course. Just trying to be modest.

@klaudioabazi4478

2 жыл бұрын

@LeoTheBritish-Eurasian You too Bro. Keep up your love for history.

@velstadtvonausterlitz2338

2 жыл бұрын

@LeoTheBritish-Eurasian nah, Alexander is an overrated trash.

@mubarizunmedia6897

2 жыл бұрын

Alexander the great is blessed with a good military mind and probably the best army when it comes to quality and discipline by the standards of their time. I have little doubt that Khalid ibn al Walid was heavily influenced by the idea of the companion cavalry and so Khalid himself created the elite Mobile guard regiment, a powerful light shock cavalry, that relied on speed and precision rather than brute strength.

@klaudioabazi4478

2 жыл бұрын

@@mubarizunmedia6897 Yes Bro. Khalid ibn Al-Walid is one of the most underrated figures in history. Without a doubt in my mind one of the greatest commanders of all time. A true genius who made it possible for islam to flourish after the death of the prophet.

Just remember, Alexander the Great was around the age of 24 during this battle The sheer force of personality and intellect this man had…my god

@jonbaxter2254

2 жыл бұрын

24 year old today can't do their tax returns...

@kingt0295

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonbaxter2254 im 19 and cant even drive lmao

@abdinoormohamed8243

2 жыл бұрын

He was actually 25

@DestroyerOfSense000

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonbaxter2254 I don't think Alexander could either.

@boredgunner

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonbaxter2254 True in the US but that's also how the tax and education systems are designed (the former being needlessly complex, the latter never teaching you how to do your taxes), in order to make people reliant on TurboTax and such corporations who lobby to keep taxes overly complex, in order to scrape more money from people.

The sheer discipline of the Macedonians to change and adapt quickly on the battlefield is just magnificent. King Philip really made it an army without equal.

@101Mant

2 жыл бұрын

@@AeneasGemini I don't know what you read or watch but the professionalism of the army and Philips reforms comes up all the time any serious discussion of Alexander's army.

@artinrahideh1229

Жыл бұрын

It was a great army but it was pretty much Persians failing to fight correctly and allowing them to win such great battles.

@donttakeitpersonal8704

Жыл бұрын

@@artinrahideh1229 Persians lost almost every war with the Greeks even though they had always more soldiers on the battlefield. I think the Persians soldiers were just not good as Greek hoplites.

@artinrahideh1229

Жыл бұрын

@@donttakeitpersonal8704 The Conquest of Asia minor and its Greeks cities by Cyrus the Great, the campaign of Mardonius, The Ionian revolt, Delian league's campaign in Egypt and Cyprus, Corinthian war( this was a diplomatic and political victory), Parthia's war against seleucids and maybe another war(s) that i do not know were all won by Iranians against Greeks. Persian soldiers and armies were never bad or inferior compared to any other army in their normal status. It was their leadership that sucked in some occasions. For example Darius III neither chose a good strategy nor a good tactic. Had he been realistic there wouldn't have been an Alexander the Great( They could have defeated Alexander by aiming at their supply lines and making sure that Alexander's army didn't get a drop of water or bit of food from land of Achaemenids. Also mountain ambushes were highly effective).

@artinrahideh1229

Жыл бұрын

@@donttakeitpersonal8704 Hoplites were heavy infantry and they were better protected compared to Persians. This was also noted by Herodotus who said that Persians lost due to their lack of armour in Platea. You are right about a Hoplite being better than an Immortal, but it wasn't like a pistol vs Sniper rifle. It was mostly based on tactics and terrain. I think Persians actually defeated the Greek center at Marathon.

Darius could have won if he just used NordVPN

@abdirahmanbadal781

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂

@jackf1830

Жыл бұрын

Been saying this for YEARS I tells you!

@thefool8234

Жыл бұрын

Darius could have won if he knew what he was doing

@optioningthabears861

Жыл бұрын

The 300 had their info used against them as well. That's why I always use nord vpn

@thatonetroll1059

Жыл бұрын

@@thefool8234 looks like your not fun in parties huh

Still blows my mind how parmenion holds his calvary for so long, literally the reason Alexander’s front wasn’t flanked

@dreamerafterall1413

2 жыл бұрын

That cleary depicts how well trained Alexander's army was

@tylerdurden3722

2 жыл бұрын

Up until this point, the Greeks mainly used cavalry for defense. The Thessalians were the masters of this type of defensive cavalry fighting on flanks, using a diamond formation that could fight in either direction. The reason the left flank defended so well time after time was not because of Parminion (who dies shortly after this), but because the Thesallians were an elite cavalry force who specialized in this task. Alexander will later send the Thesallians home and employ eastern cataphracts (mostly Bactrian cataphracts) to fill this role.

@dimitrioskontsiotis2267

Жыл бұрын

That's not entirely true. Even if the Thessalian cavalry would have broke and been routed the Persian cavalry then would have had to deal with the 7,000 heavily armored Greek Hoplites in reserve. They were put in reserve to prevent any outflanking maneuvers. That's why Alexander put them in reserve.

@tianx9275

Ай бұрын

The key difference between a veteran army and raw recruits. Most of these soldiers have been fighting since Phillip's period so they are at the peak of their fighting prowess.

The level of intelligence, maturity, discipline but also improvisational skills, boldness, calm-and-cool under pressure confidence Alexander displayed, and at such a young age, is what separates him from every other general in history. And not just military tactics, but also the way he set up shop in a conquered area to ensure loyalty, happiness among the people, and establishing connections to his other territories. It's a wonder to think what he could have done with the empire were it not for his untimely death.

@thefool8234

Жыл бұрын

Or he simply faced someone incompetent we would never know

@OytheGreat

Жыл бұрын

@@thefool8234 A vast, highly experienced and armoured army is still exactly that, even when their king is no great general. Alexander was brave to the point of madness and a genius general beyond any of his time.

@thefool8234

Жыл бұрын

@@OytheGreat True but realistically if he faced someone like himself or just a decent ruler like the king who was “King of all Kings” before he was murdered and usurped by the Darius we all know and love for creating are favorite childhood hero and the “hero of heroes”. But murdering whole citizens filled with women and children is to me not great. Don’t say “It’s war” that is not war its murder and you can’t justify it. Alexander is rotten in the ground with the maggots thinking he was the Greatest but once he died all his work proved for nothing as it collapsed for his utter incompetence in governance by failing to name any heir or sire any children to father and past his genius and greatest on to.

@OytheGreat

Жыл бұрын

@@thefool8234 Well yes, of course. But you just proved that he himself was the difference maker. If he faced an equally adept Persian general, the main distinguishing factor wouldn't have been the leadership. But now it was: his men were superior, more battle-hardened and more loyal. But that alone cannot overcome such odds. You need brilliant tactics to offset your huge numerical disadvantage. Alexander did that, time and time again, to conquer cities and beat armies on their home soil. That is why he is so great: because he pulled off miraculous victories over and over and even fought in the vanguard himself.

@vCLOWNSHOESv

Жыл бұрын

What would have happened in Rome? Maybe nothing?

Alexander's "forget the army, make a beeline for the commander" strategy worked amazingly well over and over again, and was so effective in disrupting Ancient warfare hierarchies/discipline/cohesion that I'm surprised more armies didn't employ it more often.

@101Mant

2 жыл бұрын

@@AeneasGemini I'm not sure how being vulnerable to the tactics would stop you employing it. You wouldn't send your own commander to do it but nothing stops you sending a bunch of your good troops.

@averyshaw2142

2 жыл бұрын

Yes when reading kingdom they used it constantly and I've always wondered why it wasn't used more often in real life

@VojislavMoranic

2 жыл бұрын

Such tactics were employed the medieval Serbian army. At the battle of Velbuzd against the Bulgarians ending with the death of the Bulgarian Tsar. At the battle of Kosovo in 1389 with the death of Sultan Murad. At the battle of Nicopolis with the capture of the royal standard by the Serbian knights. But is a extremely risky move and most often it ends with the attackers doing their job but being cut down anyway so you can understand why so few would volunteer for such a thing. Because contrary to romantic view, nobody on any side wants to die.

@velstadtvonausterlitz2338

2 жыл бұрын

@@VojislavMoranic indeed, these fanboys are just too stupid to get it. But hey, why interrupt your enemies when they're making a mistake? In my opinion, glorify such attitude until it becomes a norm, and exploit it when it becomes popular to your advantage.

@firstconsul7286

2 жыл бұрын

He's played enough Total War to know that general sniping is a legitimate tactic

The battle that made Alexander, the Great, and transformed him into a legend by all those he met, leaving an enduring tradition of romances across the world.

I'm not a big fan of the 2006, film adaptation of Alexander the Great. However, I do think the way it depicted the battle of Gaugemela was really impressive.

@jlvfr

2 жыл бұрын

Imho, it's pretty much the only part worth watching, tbh. After that, the movie turns into crap...

@aegystierone8505

2 жыл бұрын

@@jlvfr at least the harem dancing scene was quite something.....

@jlvfr

2 жыл бұрын

@@aegystierone8505 well... yeah, but it wasn't what we wanted in such a movie... well, not quite. ;)

@gingerbill128

2 жыл бұрын

dreadful film.

@szarekhthesilent2047

2 жыл бұрын

battle of Indus was ok too. very inaccurate, but still ok.

One the most pivotal of ancient battles. It cemented the collapse of the Achaemenid Empire and the rise of Hellenistic expansion towards the east and the Persian Mediterranean World.

@lakshmipraveen8734

2 жыл бұрын

You like Achaemenid or Alexander III Empire?

@aeroaero5472

2 жыл бұрын

@@RoyalZarak killed by the Mauryas?

@PYRESATVARANASI

2 жыл бұрын

@@lakshmipraveen8734 I like both. Darius III and Alexander III empires were both awesome in their own respective ways.

@lakshmipraveen8734

2 жыл бұрын

@@PYRESATVARANASI 🙂

@johnnyboy3410

Жыл бұрын

India conquered probably

I've studied this battle countless different ways throughout the years, but nobody covers it like kings and generals..., 👑 ⚔️

@Harrier_DuBois

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah this channel is great!

@tylerdurden3722

2 жыл бұрын

By far, the best depiction of this battle I've ever seen. It's not perfect though. The infantry were ordered to move first by Alexander, before Alexander began his March to the right (while the more agile infantry and skirmishers hid in the dust cloud that was kicked up by the cavalry). Also, we know that Alexander crossed into Asia with only 9000 Pikemen. The rest of the heavy infantry were from the Corinthian League, various Mercenaries and more infantry from the areas north of Macedonia (Illyria, Thrace, Paeonia, etc). So, of the 37 000 infantry, only 9000 were Macedonians who carried sarrissa pikes. In Alexander's original army, there were 7000 Allied Hoplites. And 5000 Mercenary Hoplites. 3000 were Macedonian Hypaspists. So the other 13000 were various other types of infantry. It dissapointing to always see all those other infantry depicted as pikemen, when only 1/4 of the infantry were pikemen. There were more Hoplites than pikemen in that army, yet seeing Hoplites depicted is very rare (though Alexander did most times intentionally reduce their roles because he didn't trust most of the other Greeks from the Corinthian League that formed a sizable part of his army). At least this time, the second line was depicted as Hoplites. And the Hypaspists were at least mentioned to be the infantry who were at the critical point of the battle, where Alexander slammed from the side with thee companions.

@williamyoung9401

Жыл бұрын

You and countless other conquerors throughout history, lol.

@shanebraaten9553

Жыл бұрын

@@williamyoung9401 currently planning a campaign, to launch an invasion into my neighbor's yard to Annex His swimming pool and basketball court... still working out the logistics, Lol...

Although Napoleon is my favorite conqueror/military genius, the Battle of Gaugamela is the most intelligent battle strategy I've read.

@centpushups

2 жыл бұрын

Its genius is how simple it is but executed so well timed.

@Willzy800

2 жыл бұрын

Napoleon's Battle of Austerlitz is a modern version of Gaugamela.

@Willzy800

2 жыл бұрын

@@centpushups Alexander surmised correctly that by cutting off the head off the snake, the entire command structure falls into chaos.

@EagleLeader1

2 жыл бұрын

@@Willzy800 there is some resemblance in terms of starategy but also key differences: High ground of Pratzen heights at Austerlitz (Gaugamela was relatively flat & prepared by the Persians), Napoleon arriving first (Alexander arrived after Darius), Napoleon's weak right flank to tempt the enemy in was not personally led by Napoleon & was mostly a stagnant defense (Alexander led his right ruse & it's force was the key blow where Napoleon's left made the key blow).

@Willzy800

2 жыл бұрын

@@EagleLeader1 Luring the Austrians on to his flank in order to open a gap in the centre and then charging through the centre. Similar to Alexander's half fake attack on the Persian left, the split of the enemy army, and the sudden attack on the Persian centre.

The Battle which made Alexander a legend. Enough said.

Alexander be playing 4D chess while everyone is playing 2D.

@Leynx-Et-Fenrir

2 жыл бұрын

But like yourself, he was not alone on the battlefield

darius: i have u outnumberd 10 : 1 alexander: i like those odds

@Eleftherios323

2 жыл бұрын

1 Hellene equals 10 of them, we Hellenes(Corinthians,Macedonians,Athenians,Acheans,Aeolians,Mollosians,Halkidikiotes,Epirotes,Spartans,Peloponnesians,Dorians,Ionians,Cretans,Boeotians,Aetolians and Islanders) have a saying:We dont ask how many they are but where they are?.Lightweight baby🇬🇷💪

@satanwithinternet2753

2 жыл бұрын

@@Eleftherios323 👌

@satanwithinternet2753

2 жыл бұрын

@@Eleftherios323 also Alexander was not greek but slav

@Liquidsback

2 жыл бұрын

@@avik4343 Fair enough, 80,000 with conservative estimates, 120000 at most.

@BoogieBubble

2 жыл бұрын

@@satanwithinternet2753 source: Trust me bro.

Alexander is one of the greatest Hellenes in history. A great leader in battle or out of it. Not much have been said about his government style and ideas, which it was simply incredible for the time.

@robberbarron7602

2 жыл бұрын

How can Alexander be a Hellene if he took over the Hellenes? Lmao

@KonstantinosFrizz

2 жыл бұрын

@@robberbarron7602 Hellenes got involved to a lot of civil wars in our history. Just like every nation we have our own demons

@hellenicsun5792

Жыл бұрын

@@robberbarron7602 Greeks used to fight between them

@robberbarron7602

Жыл бұрын

@@hellenicsun5792 Greek city states fought eachother, Macedonia was an entirely separate kingdom. A style of government the Greeks found backwards and barbaric like the Macedonians themselves

@hellenicsun5792

Жыл бұрын

@@robberbarron7602 That's why they took part at Olympics? Only Greeks could take part...The house of Alexander the Great was Argus capital of Peloponnese. Read some history

I think Gaugamela is Alexander's most complex battle, certainly the crucial manoeuvre was and is very original. Opposite to other battles were he was the first man to display a battle tactic then followed by other generals (like the attack over the Scythians), the half fake attack on the Persian left, the split of the enemy army and the sudden attack on the Persian centre is a manoeuvre rarely done in military history. Usually a flank attack is performed after the destruction or disbanding of the enemy flank, but in front of a so superior enemy foe, he pinned down the enemy flank and destroyed the enemy cohesion by putting down the command centre, annihilating the enemy in flee, not by encircling or by pure pressure. You must be a genius if you achieve this, a master of maneuvering, and Alexander was it.

@tylerdurden3722

2 жыл бұрын

Wait till you see the pre-battle and Battle of Hydaspes animated in detail like this one.

Bloody grateful for what you did in this video. It seems every reenactment of the battle I see, I get to pick up on new details. Thank you Kings & Generals.

Fun facts about the battle from Curtius's account: - Alexander did try to pursue Darius again at least until dusk. When he went back to his camp he was ambushed by a group of Persians, he skewered the horseman who got close to him and both groups fought in disorder more violently than the battle and yet again he avoided death - The troops that got into the Macedonian camp actually believed that the battle was over XD and could speak to Sisigambis (Darius's mother) and they told her joyfully that she was finally free and victory was theirs. But interestingly, she simply sat down not utterning any word or showing any emotion. - Alexander freaked out when Menidas told him this news because any word that there were troops on the camp meant that the whole army would retreat and sent the light cavalry to deal with it. Something foreshadowing to what would happen to his secretary years later - If you read this battle from Curtius you'd get an idea how the Macedonians were really struggling from this battle, Alexander's right wind was surrounded as well in fact and many of his horses died. We can't be sure how many Macedonians really died

@Raphley

Жыл бұрын

@@something4179 he probably had access to contemporary account as well when he did his research

This shows the competence of Alexander and his advisors. in his campaign, Alexander is "almost" defeated (for like, ten times) but he always somehow pulls a victory

No one else in the history of man kind performed such a great Victory such a Triumph! Invaded in a foreign land in the largest Empire at that time. Gave to the History the greatest epic victory! A triumph of strategic tactics and military innovation, In a ratio of one to at least five men. From Macedonia Greece Alexander the Great the one and only general he was never defeated in battle. Awe to us the Greeks and to the whole world.

@nisarbo3781

2 жыл бұрын

The battle of Cannae would like to have a word with you

@nihil_hd1598

Жыл бұрын

@@nisarbo3781 yeah hannibal was also a goat

He led the army by being on the battlefield. One cannot deny that events that happen every time he is in a precarious situation, whether by sheer luck or by talent and skill, he was able to survive and exploited it well while his enemies lag behind. It is as if the Gods were on his side. He is a madman with a plan. He is brilliant yet brutal. And don't forget that he can inspire his men in times of almost certain defeats or when the odds were against them.

So many videos captured this legendary battle and it still never gets old.

I used to have this excellent book called 100 Decisive Battles and reading about Gaugamela was insane. That and Caesar at the battle of Alesia were probably my two favorites. These videos are great. Keep up the excellent work!!

I am currently reading Arrian's account of the Battle of Gaugamela. This video was immensely helpful in bringing the story alive. Thank you for posting it.

Your contents, and mostly your explanatory graphics are remarkably didactic and clear; making it easy to remember, as one recalls the graphics and thus the contents. One of the best history channels on KZread ! Thanks a lot!

I love hearing about Alexander the Great. It’s interesting that so many centuries ago all of this took place, yet we still talk about him to this day. I think Alexander’s biggest goal was not to rule, but to die a glorious death and be remembered long after he was gone, he accomplished that. Even though I know he died mysteriously and before he really even had a chance to rule. His name and deeds still live on.

Thanks Kings and Generals for the such good content and for being great creators to look up to!

@expandedhistory

2 жыл бұрын

Couldn’t have said it any better! Kings and Generals are pure quality content and in fact inspired me to make my history channel.

@paulstephensia1412

2 жыл бұрын

I agree.

I’ve been rewatching the battle from the movie and watching other channels so happy you dropped your version of it I love your takes

I always needed this. This is one of the most famous battles ever!

Now that I have some time to watch this Alexander serie, I’m pleased by the quality of the content. This battle in this video is depicted as good as it was so pivotal back then. Can’t wait to watch the next episode!

"I was here at Gaugumela. For the honor......and GLOOOOORY OF GREECE!!! ZEUS BE WITH US!!!

This is my Favorite battle in history! Thank you so much for covering this!

Love this series on Alexander. I impatiently wait for each new video. keep em coming!

Quite a testament to the Macedonian army that they didn't fold when facing such numbers. And also perhaps a miracle Alexander wasn't killed during the fighting

@markcoroneos7811

2 жыл бұрын

Plot armour

@DestroyerOfSense000

2 жыл бұрын

As might be expected of one who modelled himself on Achilles, Alexander was a superb and utterly fearless fighter. Of course there was still risk, but he could handle himself.

@georgescott6620

2 жыл бұрын

He was surrounded by his absolute best and most loyal men so yes there was risk, but in each engagement as long as he had the initiative the odds were very much in his favour

@samuellennon1984

2 жыл бұрын

He nearly died eleven times in the campaign, even getting lung shot at one point. No wonder he thought himself a god towards the end. He must've thought no one could kill him.

@tylerdurden3722

2 жыл бұрын

@@samuellennon1984 He believed that even before the invasion started. Alexander was very religious and superstitious and the Oracle at Delphi told him he's invincible why he was dragging her by the hair...so he believed it.

What I think is the most impressive part is that how Alexander strongly stood at undeniably the most important part of the battlefield and held Bessus despite being extremely inferior in numbers. Parmenion was also beyond someone's expectations. Very impressive how the Macedonians managed to hold ground tightly in the gaps formed between the Persian and Macedonian cavalry.

@user-ro7ky9sq3t

8 ай бұрын

That y said bro is the most more importand point of the aaalll battle.and the key of winning.hiii greetings from greece thessaloniki .im half spartan and half macedonian born in vergina the bjrthplace of alexandrer the great i walk eeeveeeryyy day to the road who walk this more most greedy motherfucker of the aaalll world eeeveeer until now and i think about that never again will born like this man . even with half skills who has

As always a great production, well done and thanks for the knowledge of ancient warfare and tactics in general.

Brilliant! This video came just in time for my battle with Darius in the DEI Alexander campaign!

Unbelievable that this content is free, one of the best channels on KZread

15:42 The eagle from the movie

Incredible video, helped me understand the battle and tactics so much better! Great job and thank you!

Thank you very much Kings and generals for creating a new video on The Great Battle of gargamilla for Alexander's conquest though I would like to say once again you have done a great job at demonstrating Alexander the greats tactical mind and strategical mind while he had faced an army of 150,000 with only 40,000 men and had conquered the accommended empire

That was freaking awesome. I love everything about your presentation and you make history awesome to watch .

The epic battle of my beloved Alexander! I intend to visit this battlefield in the future, this video will be very useful in my work, THANK YOU ✌❣

@shantirelaxingmusic5285

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Irena! I'm waiting for your next video!

One of my favourite topic's! Thank you Kings and Generals Team.

Yessssssssss been waiting for this since you teased it out a few weeks ago. WHAT A BATTLE!

Great episode. Makes me want to watch the movie about Alexander again.

This was one of the greatest battles in the history of human civilization and warfare of any age.

Well done, thank you for yet another high caliber production.

Wow. Take my breath away. So glad you guys made this video!

One of the most iconic and probably most important battle in the history of whole humankind.

I love this series, it’s so clear and thorough. Could the next episode be on the occupation of Babylon. I feel like that next period, before moving on to continue the conquest, is a unique point in history. It was revolutionary to capture such a prize, but to spare the ancient city from being sacked. Then moving to instigate the two cultures. I think that would be an interesting deep dive. Appreciate all you do to educate everyone on our shared history

finally I was waiting for this episode. thank you soo much.

Only you guys can quench my thirst for history, Thank you for your kindness. Can't explain how grateful I am, Thank you.

I'd love to see y'all do a profile on the kings in this series. Like your old video on the diplomatic achievements of Philip II. The personality clashes (albeit filtered through Arrian and Q.C. Rufus) are so cool!

Μέγας Αλέξανδρος!

Brilliant video Brilliantly presented and narrated! Thanking you but we want MORE!

The entire series is excellent. Look forward to the remaining videos eagerly.

alexander coming back for parmenion always puts a smile on my face ❤️☺️

Top-notch work K&Gs! My friend Malay Archer once again did a GREAT job!

@MalayArcher

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you my friend 😄

@MalayArcher

2 жыл бұрын

@@comradekenobi6908 Divide et Impera

KINGS AND GENERALS WITH AN ABSOLUTE BANGER OF A DOCUMENTARY 🔥🔥🔥

Coincidentally I'm in the throes of reading Arrian's Alexander. You've made a good descriptive video of the Battle of Gaugamela which helped to clarify one or two areas for me. Thank you.

A great general who was also a great warrior. A strategic and tactical genius who personally led his troops in battle and fought at the tip of the spearhead. And, in the midst of chaos, dust, screaming men, the fog of battle, how he could always personally lead the decisive strike at the moment of truth is a mystery to me. He marched all over the known world, undefeated.

It is by defeating a generally huge army that made Alexander famous around the world.

@szarekhthesilent2047

2 жыл бұрын

@@kamleshmanjhi1234 it wasn't though. the Achemenid army was no joke. They had around 100.000 highly experienced very capable men from all around the world and even their inexperienced troops were well trained and, for that time and their absurd size, well equipped.

great video and series, can't wait for the next one.

WOW! WELL DONE! THANKS FOR SUCH AN AWESOME DOCUMENTARY!

I'm sure Darius can trust that Bessus guy.

@Eleftherios323

2 жыл бұрын

Oh big foreshadowing god damn Darius he didnt see it coming

@umms29

2 жыл бұрын

He had his ears and nose sliced off and inpaled for his troubles.

@tylerdurden3722

2 жыл бұрын

@@THomAs.H.P.76 perhaps it was. Shady things happened in Egypt...perhaps the next video will go into detail.

Alexander the Great. Undefeated against impossible odds. Truly changed world history.

Its crazy that to this day military still studies Alexander battles and tactics.

Been waiting for this for months!!! So much excitement I need my popcorn!

Looking at the breakdown of Cavalry at the Persian's disposal, it really is a miracle Alexander won. Saka-Sogdian Scythian Cappadocian Armenian as well their own cavalry. OP AF.

@tylerdurden3722

2 жыл бұрын

Even the Indian Cavalry. They were using an early form of stirrups at that time (the things that later made heavy knights possible). Even the real Persian Cavalry were OP. (in the previous battles, and this battle, they remained while the others were retreating and fought almost till the last man). At Granicus Alexander gave these Persians herioc funerals.

@Wrtvrxgvcf55

Жыл бұрын

just shows you the importance of leadership! The persian cavalry should've been used better.

Achilles says "Imagine a king that fights his own battles"

@deepdungeon8465

2 жыл бұрын

@@AeneasGemini don't forget, badass and experienced guards.

@firstconsul7286

2 жыл бұрын

@@GothPaoki And there are pros and cons to both. If you're in the back, you can direct the battle quickly, and if there is some kind of development that requires your attention and deliberation, it's easier to be informed about it and figure out what to do if you're not swinging swords at the enemy. When you're in the thick of it you sacrifice that for a display of personal bravery, courage, strength, and likely trust in your generals to be able to react in your stead, which is a huge morale booster. Personally I'd say that Alexander was taking a gamble (albeit sometimes a small one) every time he got personally involved in a fight, which is that there would be no change in the battlefield that requires his deliberation and reaction.

@tylerdurden3722

2 жыл бұрын

Most kings did fight their own battles. In Greek culture its almost unheard-of for a king not to be on the front line, in the right of the Phalanx (the most vulnerable place in a phalanx). Plus, Achilles was a prince, and would have become king had he not died. All the other main characters were kings and princes...and they all fought. E.g. Odysseus was King of Corcyra. Menelaus was King of Sparta. Etc. Even Agamemnon. Who was just one king of many in that coalition army. (the Greeks usually chose a hegemon...in this case it was Agamemnon)

@stonem0013

Жыл бұрын

@@firstconsul7286 he was able to react to changes immediately with his companion cavalry, which he led. His sub generals were trusted to lead the phalanx and their job was usually to simply engage asap with the enemy. The more complex dynamic manoevering was done by the cavalry, which he led personally from the front. So actually his approach gave him more instant responsiveness and dynamism.

@williamyoung9401

Жыл бұрын

That movie is off on so many things, but the one thing I LOVE is the fact there aren't any stirrups on the saddles! Every other Hollywood movie gets that wrong! =P

Excellent!!! Program !!! Thank You 😊

Very good I liked that ❤ the best source for this battle I saw ever now

Great video. I forgot you were doing a series on Alexander the Great. Glad to have seen this video. Hey when your done with this series maybe you can make a video on Xenophon's adventures in Persia. I'm sure it would be a great watch. My compliments to all those who made this video a reality.

We can get glimpse of how brutal the chariot attack went down when the phalanx opened gaps from Diodorus: "Some of the chariots did get through to the phalanx, however, and the Macedonians opened up sizeable gaps through which the chariots sped. Some of these were stopped by a hail of javelins, while others rode through and escaped, but some were moving so fast and using the blades of their scythes so effectively that death in many different forms ensued. [5] Such were the sharpness and the destructive force of the tempered blades that many men had their arms sliced off, shields and all. Quite a few others were decapitated, and their heads fell to the ground with eyes still open and facial expressions unchanged, and in some cases the blades lethally tore open men’s sides and brought a swift death."

I can't wait for the next video in this series!!!!!

Been waiting for this!!

I always wonder how history would have been different if Alexander had stopped after this battle and consolidated his conquests. Pushing further east was always going to be a strategic disaster, he was massively overstretched.

@kingt0295

2 жыл бұрын

He was still using Persian infrastructure, they stood for a centuries he just needed to live longer and raise a real heir for political stability

Another great episode in a great series. Keep up the good work!

Thank you , K&G . 🐺

Best one yet. Epic tale!

A little detail... When Persians took over Alexander's camp they found there Darius' mother under capture. They said to her "we'll take you back to your son", she answered "no, I know Alexander will win, I'm safe here"

This series is amazing

Great work Sir thank you

Bazbattles got me inlove with alexander so when i seen u guys making a series on him i got so excited !!!!! because althought i love bazbattles (it was my first) u guys flesh out more to the story ... love you both and thank you Devon and team

Imagine seeing these Macedonians, what incredible men they must have been

The eagle flying down Alexander's line... Somebody watched Oliver Stone's Alexander

@joesmith1946

3 ай бұрын

That's not necessarily from the movie. That incident actually occurred. An eagle flew over the Macedonians and towards the Persians, which the Macedonians took as an omen.

Done been waiting for this!

This and you sir, Is the best 👌🏽

Waiting for Battle of Hydaspes 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Alexander the Greatest conqueror of all time

Fantastic work as always guys

Been waiting for this one.

Sir they have prepared the battlefield and have gained every single advantage they could! Alexander; They activated my trap card

How the hell did Darius' army even manage to issue orders with that many different nationalities within it?

@paulstephensia1412

2 жыл бұрын

Very simple children of local Nobles from conquered territories were sent to be educated in Persia then they were sent back to their homelands some were from territories that were allowed to have self governance therefore when called upon they were willing to provide assistance and support.

@samuelwetterau9226

2 жыл бұрын

Centuries of practice.

@mjc4073

2 жыл бұрын

It turns out diversity was not Darius' strength.

@samuelwetterau9226

2 жыл бұрын

@@mjc4073 the Persian Empire held together many different peoples for 200 years. That was no small achievement. Besides there is no Indication that the fegest of gaugamela was caused by a Lack of coordination of Contingents from different Nations. Besides, the peoples of modern Iran and centralasia which Features prominently in the Battle of gaugamela, had been culturally acquainted even before the Empire was founded.

@sphere3704

2 жыл бұрын

@@mjc4073 255 years of having different cultures, and no issue, it has nothing to do with it on the other hand cowardly Darius running in front of his men does.

i'm macedonian and i live in australia thank god !!! we dont have a lot to celebrate after 500 years rule of the ottoman empire so i enjoy these youtube clips !!!