Wizards and Warriors: kzread.infofeatured Cold War: kzread.info/dron/CGvq-qmjFmmMD4e-PLQqGg.html TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@kingsandgenerals

@ilikemaps9033

Жыл бұрын

Ok

@neiloflongbeck5705

Жыл бұрын

It's a strange map you've used. The Ouse and the Trent meet, but don't flow to the sea.

@elias_xp95

Жыл бұрын

I wish we had educational resources like this when I was at school, it would have made learning far more engaging than it subsequently was. I am thankful for the brilliant teachers I had who made the best of boring textbooks.

@madalinsayan7815

Жыл бұрын

Guys, one question, Are you still planning to make the thirty years war in 2 hours documentary? like combine all parts?

@geraintthatcher3076

Жыл бұрын

Can't wait till you do Montrose Campaign in Scotland

The "Royalist Cavalry wins and then leaves the field" is going to become something of a running theme, by the way.

@damiyoflapies8473

Жыл бұрын

NOOOOOO why ;(

@the_quietobserver

Жыл бұрын

Only if they were more disciplined

@brightlight7538

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the spoiler rando guy

@1996koke

Жыл бұрын

Also Charles having victory at his hands and letting it go by doing something different

@Phisting

Жыл бұрын

🤣👌

I'm sure that after Edgehill, Prince Rupert will realize he should remain on the field of battle until the engagement is decided. I look forward to seeing him turn the flanks of the Parliamentary forces in the next battle, and bring the English Civil War to a quick and decisive end with minimal bloodshed.

@SantomPh

Жыл бұрын

he was a cavalry commander at this point under a unified command of infantry artillery and cavalry. He would later take command of the entire Royalist Army but at the time he had to contend with others both in council and in court.

@projectpitchfork860

Жыл бұрын

Man, I really hope I don’t get dissapointed.

@101Mant

Жыл бұрын

@@SantomPh he was a cavalry command who was great at leading his calvary to victory and terrible at actually taking advantage of that.

@megood1582

Жыл бұрын

well this is not total war game where every units are listening to commander

@firstlast7052

Жыл бұрын

Lol, Boye (sic) are you going to be dissapointed.

Edgehill was the baptism of fire for a then approximately 22 year old William Hiseland, who would serve in the English and later British armies for an unprecedented 70 plus years, only dying in 1732 at the claimed age of 111. Hiseland is known to have fought at the Battle of Malplaquet in 1709 at the age of 89, serving as a sergeant in an infantry battalion and reportedly still possessing the strength of a man three generations younger. If true, he was the last surviving soldier of the English Civil War, and he was in it from the very beginning.

@lionelhutz5137

Жыл бұрын

Bloody Malplaquet

@da3v1ls93

Жыл бұрын

That's insane! To live to the triple 1 back in those days wax unheard of

@ronmaximilian6953

Жыл бұрын

And what felled this English Methuselah?

@coryhall7074

Жыл бұрын

@@ronmaximilian6953 I don't know what exactly. He was a Chelsea Pensioner but had to leave when he married at age 103(!) but returned when he outlived his wife and he died soon after.

@a_channel2545

Жыл бұрын

“English Man Literally Too Loyal to Die”

It’s crazy to think that literally everywhere in the 1600s was consumed by war at some point. Never a dull day

@kdo-double-g4269

Жыл бұрын

Even during war's darkest days, in most places around the world, absolutely nothing happens.

@likusbikus5892

Жыл бұрын

Like nowadays? 🤷‍♂️

@santymartin7383

Жыл бұрын

@@kdo-double-g4269 blackfish leave KZread and help Stannis!

@kdo-double-g4269

Жыл бұрын

@@santymartin7383 Ha! I’m glad someone got it.

@HandleMyBallsYouTube

Жыл бұрын

@@kdo-double-g4269 Well yes, but there are very clear times when everything was going to hell, and just like a war today affects people outside of the countries at war, so it did back then. I'd much rather live in Europe at almost any point of the 1500's than the 1600's, especially when it comes to central Europe. The weather kept getting colder, overfishing was a serious issue in the baltic, 30 years war, all the religious fighting and bullshittery, plagues and other diseases, hell most of our sort of ''dark medieval'' tropes in fantasy actually come from the 17th century, witch hunts and all.

Crazy to think how different things could have been if the royalist cavalry had more discipline

@SantomPh

Жыл бұрын

the issue was not that they kept chasing the enemy but that they stopped to loot, which made them incredibly difficult to regroup and heavier in the saddle. Rupert tried in vain to get his flank to wheel around quickly but they were not really keen on listening to the King's German nephew. Cavalry is lightning quick if it stays together and mounted, but if they dismount and gather loot or supplies their mobility is taken away. Charles' artillery was also foolishly placed on top of the hill, making the cannon fire little more than divot making near the river. Had he deployed them on the river bank itself between the infantry the war might have ended there as the Parliament army was not mobile enough to dodge artillery. This is a case of generals of high social rank playing soldier without actually trying to consider the battlefield situation. Rupert was the only true professional and experienced officer here, but he was also an arrogant prince who sneered at the English nobility and their ideas.

@MajorCoolD

Жыл бұрын

Thats the issue with most Cavalry engagements. You need to persue less the enemy has time to regroup and reform, but at the same time you NEED those cavalry forces to smash into the center from the flanks. It's a conondrum really which only works if the respective cavalry commander has reliable sub-commanders to which he then is able to relay orders in order to achieve both. Send enough Cav after the fleeing enemy Cav to make sure they dont reform and still have enough men left to attack the center.

@defective6811

Жыл бұрын

From a Great Man theory perspective, that would have made a difference. From the perspective of other theories, slight changes leading to Royalist victories would have at best extended the initial phases of the war, and done little to nothing to reverse the things that made the war happen.

@jeremyromero2000

Жыл бұрын

@@defective6811 yeah well if Pope Gregarious MXVVII had used the other restroom we would all be purple and speak Swahili

@101Mant

Жыл бұрын

@@defective6811 I think the war was still small enough that a good leader could turn the outcome of a battle and several such battles the war. That wouldn't roll back the causes but would change the result. Maybe decades later they would cause another conflict but a lot could happen in that time which might address the causes or cause then to become obsolete.

i think a short focus video comparing the royalist and parlimentary troops would be helpful. how they were recruited, their uniforms, how they got their nicknames and their commanders. great vid as always.

@Dustin_Bins

Жыл бұрын

Very good idea, thank you for the awesome comment/idea

@AngloSaxonWheatFarmer

Жыл бұрын

The recruitment and arming would be incredibly similar.

@chadocracy

Жыл бұрын

would love to see this

@firstlast7052

Жыл бұрын

It depends when and where during the English Civil War. The book "Worcestershire Under Arms: An English County During the Civil Wars" by Malcolm Atkin describes in detail what recruitment was like during the war in what was for most of it a frontier county. Basically at the start of the war every county had a militia (Cities such as London had trained bands which were similar), they were an excuse for the lads that wanted to, to turn out every so often to play at soldering and then go down to the pub. The two rabbles who met at Edgehill had some experience officers who had fought in the 30 years war, but think of the early years of the Bosnian War (1992-1995), rather than the well trained coalition soldiers who fought the First Gulf War (1991). Once the New Model Army was created it was another matter. Winston Churchill summed it up thus "The Story of the Second English Civil War is short and simple. King, Lords and Commons, landlords, merchants, the City and the countryside, bishops and presbyters, the Scottish army, the Welsh people, and the English Fleet, all now turned against the New Model Army. The Army beat the lot!" Stuart Asquith argues that the roots of the British Army spring from the New Model Army before 1660: "Many authorities quote the Restoration of 1660 as the birth date of our modern British Army. While this may be true as far as continuity of unit identity is concerned, it is untrue in a far more fundamental sense. The evidence of history shows that the creation of an efficient military machine [, The New Model Army,] and its proving on the battlefield, predates the Restoration by 15 years. It was on the fields of Naseby, Dunbar and Dunes that the foundations of the British professional army were laid."

The tiny castle built at the top of Edgehill is now a pub. A truly English fate for a historic building.

@kirbyculp3449

Жыл бұрын

How is the beer? And fish-n-chips?

@xersoslexersos6366

Жыл бұрын

@@kirbyculp3449 Beer is all the imported expensive dry lagers. But I have it on good word that the food is very nice - although also quite expensive. I think they also have a few rooms that they let guests say in, one being in the tower of the castle.

Finally, this period of history is fascinating and often not covered enough

I’m from banbury, had to double take when I heard it in the video! One of the local pubs, the Reinedeer inn claims one of the generals had his headquarters there. Strange to hear the place I’ve grown up in mentioned in a video

@elias_xp95

Жыл бұрын

I went to school on the grounds where a doomsday oak is located. This tree is known as the Doomsday Oak, for its association with William the Conqueror. It was one of two saplings given by the king to the then owners of Holton Park.

@DutchSkeptic

Жыл бұрын

You should screen this video at the Reinedeer Inn!

I was hoping to hear about my ancestor, Robert Devereux, the 3rd Earl of Essex, who became the first chief commander of the Parliamentarian army. He won no decisive victories, and was overshadowed in history by Oliver Cromwell and Thomas Fairfax, but im very glad to learn about these battles!

@blugaledoh2669

Жыл бұрын

How far does your ancestry go?

@lukefleetwood7958

Жыл бұрын

@@urubu715 My distant relation George Fleetwood was also instigated in the regicide of Charles I, while another relation, Charles Cromwell was Cromwell's lord deputy of Ireland , who was charged under the Act of Indemnity. Neither of them were executed.

@ASLUHLUHCE

Жыл бұрын

Spoiler alert

@ardshielcomplex8917

6 ай бұрын

Why is it these historical videos always attract the " my ancestor" wannabes ? Seriously its an epidemic !

@Mrdevs96

6 ай бұрын

@ardshielcomplex8917 because it's interesting to me. I'm sorry that it's had such a negative effect on you

This would be a fine setting for a Total War that wanted to tell a more tighter story.

@ArcanaC

Жыл бұрын

Yeah I've always thought that since I was a kid

Yes! Been waiting for Civil War stuff, hugely underatted. I feel it could be a great series like Rome, as there were so many iconic charatcers.

@josephippolito1402

Жыл бұрын

I would watch the hell out of that

@apexnext

Жыл бұрын

I had no idea about this Civil War. Its fascinating. 😎👍 Being American, I thought history started at 1776. 😂

@jonbaxter2254

Жыл бұрын

@@apexnext Lol, my house is older than that.

@bcfcbennjy99

Жыл бұрын

@@jonbaxter2254 my local pub is from 1368 and saw action in the civil war, being attacked by Prince Rupert's troops.

@gothicgolem2947

Жыл бұрын

Do u know which of the long Roman civil war vids are first?

Great job guys. Been waiting for the English Civil War for a while. Just a note in pronunciation. Derby is "Darby" and Kineton is "Kin-e-ton." There's lots of civil war history in the Worcester area. Powick Bridge still exists and is now a foot only bridge across the River Teme, a Severn tributary. You will pass over it while walking to Worcester from the south from Powick. Not to be confused with the brand new bridge over the road! It's very cool to walk over for those lovers of history, knowing battles took place around it 350 years before. It's sturdy that's for sure. There is a pub in Worcester called "The King Charles House" that bears Charles' picture as it's logo and there are a dozen stories of Charles II, son of Charles I, hiding in places around the area after the battle of Worcester late in the civil war. Worcester was a Royalist stronghold during the Civil War and the King knew he could operate from there without interference

@patriarch7237

Жыл бұрын

Likewise Berwick is pronounced "Berrick", not "burr-wick". Really looking forward to this series!

@lj3605

Жыл бұрын

and Shrewsbury is Shrowsbree

@dylanjwagner

Жыл бұрын

All of these asinine pronunciations are proof the English can’t be trusted with their own language

@firstlast7052

Жыл бұрын

@@lj3605 "and Shrewsbury is Shrowsbree" Groan! Most at the school would agree with you most in the town would not.

I don't know how far you're planning on going on this but any coverage of the Leveller revolts and the various radical groups of the aftermath of the Civil Wars (Levellers, Ranters, Diggers, Fifth Monarchists etc) would be great!

I remember doing this for A-level, a lot more fun when you don’t have to write essays on the topic.

Fun fact - the Parliamentarian cavalry who deserted to the Royalist side were led by the inaptly named Sir Faithful Fortescue. Many of these men forgot the remove the sash that identified them as Parliamentarian, and were killed by the Royalist cavalry.

exceptional animation, and explanation of the events, of the complex English history

Thank you, Kings and Generals! I’ve been waiting for the good ole pike and shot for some time. Very pleased!

Excellent video! I know next to nothing about this war it will be interesting to follow! Greetings from Sweden! 🇸🇪

@kirbyculp3449

Жыл бұрын

A world changing conflict. Heige Gustavus!

1600s had to be one of the craziest century’s in human history super bloody

A FANTASTIC synopsis/breakdown of a quite complex period in English history!

Great start, look forward to seeing the Battle of Dunbar.

So glad you're finally doing the English civil war!

It's amazing how many battles and wars were lost because the cavalry and infantry were so lacking in discipline. Personal glory and desire for plunder was more important than winning the battle, or the war.

I've seen here excellent documentaries. Keep up the good work.😁

"The Cavalry breaks through on both flanks" - Oh well that was a quick victory then. I assume something else must have happened for that rebellion to not be ended on the spot "The Cavalry then triumphantly leaves the battlefield" - Oh... right...

I love these I sometimes listen all day

Fantastic video keep it up your doing amazing job

I swear every time I watch one of these videos, I'm astonished by the detailed content but then even more surprised at mispronunciation of some fairly large places like Derby and Berwick

Been waiting for this!

Enjoying these bits of military history. Great channel.

It's weird to learn that the concept of a republic was ever popular in Britain.

Excellent stuff, very well explained.

Parliament began raising an army when the king briefly laid siege to Hull. He left for Oxford when the Royal Navy relieved the garrison. The Parliamentary artillery fire fire was more effective at Edgehill because their cannoballs skipped up the incline, whereas the Royalist guns were at a higher elevation, so their cannonballs struck plowed earth at a high angle and stopped. The advance of the Parlimaentary infantry stopped when Royalist case shot cannonfire stopped them. The role of the artillery branch has been deprecated by decades of "military historians" focused on the pageant of regiments with pennants a-flutter. For a corrective view on the role of artillery in these conflicts, read Stephen Bull's "The Furie of the Ordnance: Artillery in the English Civil Wars" (2012).

This is perfect, taking an Early modern English history class soon and this will help a lot

Thanks for the video 👍🏻

Once again , well done !

Great video, as always. Look up the siege of Clonmel. It would make a great video. During the siege and ensuing assault Cromwell's troops fell into a trap laid by Hugh "Dubh" O'Neill. The New model army lost more troops in the storming of the breach at Clonmel than in any other battle.

Crazy that this episode was out so soon Edit: mad props

@jonbaxter2254

Жыл бұрын

K&G are synonymous with quality.

Thanks for the videos

17:46 Rupert running away with his enthusiasm in the two important battles cost, Charles his head 👑 👸 🤴

I would love to see you discuss the Dutch Golden Age. Hope others would as well.

we always appreciate your hard work and dedication towards these videos. brilliant video. we love these kind of videos. love and appreciation from Sri Lanka.

Terrific series so far! ⚔🙏👍

The Royalist Cavalry’s lack of discipline is going to become an ongoing problem going forward.

I'd like to know why there is a royalist flag over Coventry? When it was held by the parliamentarians? Just before the outbreak of the civil war in 1642, Charles I was refused entry to the city of Coventry.

Nice video, thanks!

Excellent research and presentation.

You guys should do a series about Henry Morgan and his raids against the Spanish empire in the 1600s. There are very little thorough documentaries on this topic.

I totally can’t wait to see Nasbey and Marston Moor and also the 1st Marquess of Montrose.

@Oxtocoatl13

Жыл бұрын

The Marquis of Montrose entering Scotland with 2 men and more or less conquering the country in less than a year was a real flex. Too bad it didn't last.

@chasechristophermurraydola9314

Жыл бұрын

@@Oxtocoatl13 oh okay well I would say that I am really looking forward to seeing the 1st marquess of Montrose because fighting with the marquess of Montrose was a group of 2,000 Irish soldiers under Sir Alexander MacDonald and he interests me because I took a DNA test on ancestry and According to it I am 7% Irish.

Yet another great video

Nice video as always

Oh man, I've been hankering for some quality ECW videos 👌

As a round Smoothhead myself, this is so satisfying to see

Thank you , K&G . 🐺

i am really in joying this series

Traditional Scottish weapons: -Claymore -Dirk -Stool

@troystaunton254

Жыл бұрын

While often maligned and overlooked, when wielded by an enraged a religious servant girl the stool may well be the deadliest weapon of all.

Amazing video like always but what do. You use to create the battle maps?

@tonit4233

Жыл бұрын

Photoshop ;)

I used to cycle in this area a lot, Edgehill is truly one damn steep wall of a hill. I only went up there when I was feeling fresh and up for a battle with gravity.

@firstlast7052

Жыл бұрын

That is why the Cavaliers who held the high ground, but wanted a battle, marched down from the heights as the Roundheads would not have attacked them up such a steep hill.

Beautiful Well Done!

10:50 I literally live in Wellington. I never thought this tiny town would ever be mentioned on a sizable KZread channel like K&G :)

Look forward to seeing the rise of Oliver Cromwell, one of the most brilliant generals in British history by far.

@jayturner3397

Жыл бұрын

@@Poppin_off_with_panos and ? I Give you Richard 1 the lionheart, well Bi...lol

@randomhumanbeing4182

Жыл бұрын

@@Poppin_off_with_panos Is that supposed to change something? 💀

@Bullet-Tooth-Tony-

Жыл бұрын

@@Poppin_off_with_panos Source?

@BleedForTheWorld

Жыл бұрын

@@Poppin_off_with_panos aren't you also a homosexual?

@mrandrews3616

Жыл бұрын

​@@Poppin_off_with_panos I've not seen any evidence to suggest he was. Even if he was though, I don't see why that would matter.

As a Tauntonian, whenever i see Taunton on a map… I immediately turn into that guy, standing infront of a camera screaming “HEY MUM, I’M ON TV!!”

@coryhall7074

Жыл бұрын

Is Taunton the same town that had a very bloody battle during the Wars of the Roses or am I misremembering?

@joshm3119

Жыл бұрын

@@coryhall7074 that’s Towton. Taunton was where the bloody assizes happened, made famous after Judge Jeffries sentenced a silly amount of people to death after the war.

@coryhall7074

Жыл бұрын

@@joshm3119 Ahh thank you! That was after the Monmouth Rebellion yes? One of the aftershocks of the Civil War that wracked the British Isles for thirty years.

@joshm3119

Жыл бұрын

@@coryhall7074 correct! Just after the battle of Sedgemoor

@joshm3119

Жыл бұрын

@@coryhall7074 we still have the tavern that Judge Jeffries stayed in. Though, it’s now a Cafe Nero 😂

Very good documentary. Well , the presenter has documented the parts very well.

What a beautiful upgrade in "interface" elements!

Good show!

If only Sir Alec Guinness was still around to read King Charles's part...

Good stuff

Confused how someone with a British accent pronounce Berwick as "bear-wick". It's pronounced Behr-rick like oil DERRICK. Shrewsbury is "Shr-rows-bree" and Derby is "DARBY".

@jonbaxter2254

Жыл бұрын

I think he is from elsewhere and puts on an accent, as he has mis-read places before in the Viking video.

@b-rse

Жыл бұрын

Shrewsbury is both, most people from Shrewsbury actually pronounce it as "Shrews-bury"

@vivianbeckford3084

Жыл бұрын

I beleive he's Canadian. I do wish the writers would provide the narrators with pronounciation guides.

@ewabraun4151

Жыл бұрын

He is Canadian lol

@alexwinfield9540

Жыл бұрын

I mean my family are down the road from Shrewsbury (telford area), and nobody in that area pronounces it Shrowsbury

The Bishop's War will come back to haunt Charles as after Edgehill the English Civil War turned into a protracted conflict until Charles fled to Scotland but after just nine months the Presbyterians delivered him to the Parliamentarians in 1647 and he was he was held prisoner by Parliament for the next two years before they had him stand trial and executed in Whitehall on January 30, 1649. Nine days later the monarchy was formally abolished.

@SewerRatsarepeopletoo

Жыл бұрын

Spoiler Alert!

@theawesomeman9821

Жыл бұрын

the monarchy wasn't abolished. The Puritans replaced human monarchs with God as their king and Cromwell as his regent.

@firstlast7052

Жыл бұрын

"until Charles fled to Scotland" he did not flee of Scotland he fled to the Scotish Army besieging Newark-on-Trent in England. There is a Wikipedia article on this subject: "Charles I's journey from Oxford to the Scottish army camp near Newark"

@firstlast7052

Жыл бұрын

@@theawesomeman9821 by Act of [the Rump] Parliament the English monarchy was abolished. Initally the executive functions of the monarchy was replaced with a Council of State with a Lord President who chaired the meetings and was frequently replaced to stop the office becoming too influential. See the Wikipedia articles on the "Rump Parliament" and "English Council of State".

BRILLIANT !!!!!!!!!

Worcester getting a mention 👍. I went to the reenactment there as a kid, fantastic!

@firstlast7052

Жыл бұрын

The quote is from Hugh Peters sermon at the end of the Battle of Worcester in 1651, "when their wives and children should ask them where they had been and what news, they should say they had been at Worcester, where England's sorrows began, and where they were happily ended".

I'm interested in how officers and soldiers were recruited, commanded or got their foods in both the Royalist and Parliamentarians. Thanks for another great video.

@ARandomGuy24

Жыл бұрын

Would have got a lot of their food by raiding small villages such is the way of war when most go on the offensive.

@AsadAli-jc5tg

Жыл бұрын

Plundering the peasants.

@OcarinaSapphr-

Жыл бұрын

Nobles & gentry, who made the bulk of the officers*- raised a force from among their tenants (of particular appeal were any men who served in local 'Train bands' or militias**); reason that nobles & gentry were the majority of the officers, being: they were required to outfit, arm, armour, & feed their men, out of their own pocket - sometimes that meant taking some carts of supplies when they set out - at other times they could buy, or trade with the people who followed military units- the camp followers (an early unofficial wing of the armies); while for some commanders, they were a logistical & security nightmare- they were also essential to perform tasks such as washing & mending of clothes, nursing the sick, gaining additional supplies- either by foraging, or trading with nearby villages, or farmers- they could also guard camps, & perform a kind of reconnaissance while doing their usual tasks, or outright spying. In some situations, they might be tasked with watering soldiers, the injured, &/ or prisoners- especially the artillery- & might even be roped into helping load cannons & guns- though it was soldiers who would fire them. Officially, I believe requisitioning, or even confiscating supplies from people was done fairly early on- it wasn't often a blanket thing, but _usually_ focused on those who supported the opposite side- sometimes supplies might be bought or requisitioned from neutral parties- & it was a last resort to requisition from your own side - buying/ trading, as one would, while on campaign- it's possible people were often paid token sums, though there is evidence that people sold goods to armies at a massive mark-up. Looting obviously happened, but it wasn't something officers would want to make a habit of- especially if they were going to be in an area for an extended period of time; keeping the goodwill of the locals, while not always possible, was usually attempted- at least for a time - I daresay it all depends on the circumstances & need- & how much goodwill you need from those around you, what you're going to go with- if you care about what impression you make. *There were fairly few 'career soldiers', as we would term them today- standing armies did not exist in the UK - most gentlemen (unless impeded by age, capacity, health, or other circumstances) got at a minimum- the rudiments of martial training - those who were not heirs, or otherwise in a position to any real inheritance could serve in the armies of foreign nations- a ton of future Scots officers did so; serving in France, or other parts of Europe during the 80 Years' War, &/ or the 30 Years' War- if they'd had the fortune of serving in Europe, especially places like Sweden or Holland- they would get first-hand experience in the most up-to-date military techniques & knowledge of the latest tactics. Many future officers & soldiers would take this skillset back to England & Scotland - Rupert of the Rhine, despite being born a prince, & a nephew of the English king, was considered one of the finest professional soldiers of his day- though to the enemy, he was a foreign mercenary (despite visiting England on & off with his younger brother, Maurice for several years- before they came to help their uncle)- & possibly also a witch, complete with a familiar or two (his poodle, Boye- & later, another dog). The problem for these men, was that the 'Continental' style of fighting that they learned- involved things that were not 'English' - like extorting captured cities for ransoms, & leaving the battle to loot baggage trains... **They were the only real line of defense, should matters come to that- they were required to enroll in their local unit, & train several times a month, every year- there's no great detail on the matter of their training, but it can be assumed that pike, longbow, sword, & later musket & pistol training were among their disciplines - I doubt that everyone was training with real weapons, however- but it's possible that every good-sized township had a small armory... Hope that all helps - I've been doing some research on the era, but I'm not approaching anything like a scholar- I just have a deep interest in the period

Love The vid

Looking forward to the battle of Marston Moore in 44, I only know a handful of info on it. However, I'm hoping Col Sir William Lambton my ancestor get's a mention as he and his Regiment sacrificed themselves so Charles could escape. Also hoping for the battle of Piercebridge get's mentioned too as it opened the road to relieve York.

awesome

Wow. This is great. Can't wait to watch. also 5th to comment!

I honestly love how this channel takes account of the historiography and presents this in an easy to consume manner. More often than not the lazy Whig interpretation is peddled out again and again. It's nice to see the influence of Morrill, Russell, and the like presented in popular history

I visited York whilst I was still at college, specifically the areas that were of historic note in the English civil.

Please do the battle of Nantwich, it’s where I live and was the place of a huge battle between the parliamentarians and royalists

Will you ever make a series about the Crimean war and The charge of the light brigade etc?

@KingsandGenerals

Жыл бұрын

Yep

@JamesWilliams-ds8fc

Жыл бұрын

Cant wait, keep up the good work!

The only knowledge I have of this era is from the movie "Cromwell" I watched when I was a kid :). Thank you kings and generals!

@francisbrewster4948

Жыл бұрын

It's a great movie ---- i didn't see it for first time until about 2015 !!! 1970 --- Hollywood movie ?

@OcarinaSapphr-

Жыл бұрын

@@francisbrewster4948 Very much so in spirit, if not in fact - as in: very little accuracy, for a historical film- _despite_ the claims. Sorry if I put a dampener on your retroactive enjoyment of it, but.... A metric sh*tton of battles were ignored, & the battles that *_were_* mentioned or shown, displayed next to nothing in the way of accurate battlefield techniques of the time, which were often quite particular - Cromwell's men were costumed as bumblebees, in their black-&-yellow striped sleeves (there's no evidence *any* unit, on either side was in black & yellow). KZreadr The Laughing Cavalier does a fantastic 2-part review of it; there's necromancy, early deaths, inaccurate deaths- the Second & Third phases of the English Civil Wars are entirely glossed over, as is Cromwell's controversial Scottish & Irish campaigns (given 'The Troubles' were kicking off in Ireland, it was *A ChoiceTM* not to depict it in any way, shape or form- except for some allusions to Irish aid to the King) - multiple figures are sidelined or cut- to inaccurately attribute their acts to Cromwell- thus making him out to be far more present & influential in this early period than he was- the movie could have worked around this, by having him observe & grow, as a commander & politician, but nope- it chose to lionize Cromwell & give him accomplishments that were not his, attribute motives that it is exceptionally unlikely that he had, & make him a proto-communist- even not liking him, I wouldn't have done **_that_** to him- & in all honesty, Harris' rather hammy performance did nothing to endear him to me - though Guiness' much more subtle performance was a masterclass, right down to the Scottish accent when he's angry- & the hint of his childhood stutter. And his farewell to the two children that had been taken into Parliamentary custody was heartbreaking, as it must have been in real life (we know what happened, because Princess Elizabeth herself wrote about it). Also- Rupert's younger brother Maurice was not shown, as far as I could see- & the historical Rupert would have sounded a bit more like Matthew Goode's German accented English, rather than Timothy Dalton's Welsh/ English (Rupert & Maurice visited their uncle on & off for years before the wars, & I daresay their mother [Elizabeth Stuart] would have ensured they had learnt English, but he did grow up in European courts) - his fate is left up in the air, & Prince Charles' (who is way too old in the movie) gets a voiceover.

Hope we get a nod to the real OGs of the Civil War period: the Diggers.

Good Video.

Waiting for Fairfax and Cromwell to come into play...

It was a Shocking battle and a most suitable flag recovery

Best series

what phenomenal timing and coincidence, ive just begun reading Cromwell's biography by Christopher Firth.

Dammit. I try not to get hooked on a series till after it's fully released and I dont have to wait for the next part, but nooooo

very interesting

Oh hell yeah! I’m so hyped for this series.recently gotten into the ECW as a period I re-enact the royalists and so this series will be great to help me pick up on some more knowledge for that.For the king and the cause! Church and the Law! Charles King of England! Prince Rupert of the Rhine! God save the king! And a pox on the rebels!

@HairyBankers

Жыл бұрын

I get most of my uniform colors from watching re-enactments ( wargame figures) You lot are excellent .

@benryan4976

Жыл бұрын

@@HairyBankers that’s great! Thank you very much! It’s our job to help to help educate and inspire so glad we’ve done our job :)

Furthermore very good video

Vary good love history

You missed a small bit about when Charles I went to Hull to gather more arms. After they told him to basically 'Do one'. He went to a small village, Beverley, just outside Hull, about 8 miles away, it was an ammo cache and barracks I think. He got more troops and went back to Hull to try again. This time, I think he managed to gain entry.

muito bom!

19:38 here king's cavalry returned and both sides infantry are tired. Isn't this the usual moment where cavalry charges the flank and the whole rebel line break and get massacred...

Excellent work as always. One small criticism… Aberdeen is further north than shown on your map.

Aww man, too bad I gotta study for my chemistry exam beforehand, I'm saving this for tomorrow

Very intersting