This video gives an overview of the mathematical definition of a graph. It gives some basic examples and some motivation about why to study graph theory.
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 30
@Flowrobb5 жыл бұрын
On the way to the exam, having attended no graph theory lectures but instead watching this. Wish me luck
@sardorbekomonkulov6379
5 жыл бұрын
Damn, same thing here
@zerin55154 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much my year 12 class just introduced graph theory and I had trouble understanding it until now !!!
@andreiandrianov74357 жыл бұрын
Awesome presentation! Thanks!
@pawananubhav124 жыл бұрын
Absolutely stunning, thank you so muxh
@realityrealized83708 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@fiziksisfun53176 жыл бұрын
anyone know if it is at all possible to get access that NYC subway problem?
@user-xy8hp8gu4z4 жыл бұрын
Appreciated 👏 thank you man
@russelmukondwa4 жыл бұрын
Can I download the PowerPoint that was used in this video?
@pompiroy82638 жыл бұрын
very much helpful
@babyloniaw82478 жыл бұрын
thank u
@chloem.8724 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@GeeTransit6 жыл бұрын
On another book I've read, a path is defined as a sequence of vertices which none repeat. Here, the definition is replacing vertices with edges. With the book definition, making a path would disregard any multiple edges as both vertices connected to the edge would be taken, but with the video definition, the multiple edges are regarded as separate. Which one is right?
@shekinah44315 жыл бұрын
Thank youuu
@parvezmusaraf22654 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation
@chanakyasinha80466 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😀
@virgiliointoy63985 жыл бұрын
thank you
@venky38675 жыл бұрын
thanks
@S24W23 жыл бұрын
I assume when we speak of graph theory we are not talking about graphs of quadratic functions etc etc etc? That would be continuous maths yes?
@eleazaralmazan40898 жыл бұрын
This is awesome!
@sefatullapamiri34133 жыл бұрын
Thanks 👍👍
@gutenmorgan20633 жыл бұрын
the planarity website does not work anymore :(
@markkennedy97672 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't a path not repeat vertices.
@Blueiaf8 жыл бұрын
🖒
@antoniolinhares92115 жыл бұрын
Jesus said to him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man comes to the Father, but by me. João 14:6
@octavios8081
5 жыл бұрын
@tucan sam In other words, man must go the path of Jesus in order to reach Father. Thus considering only man, Father has degree 1.
@scott73736 жыл бұрын
Not very accurate
@sjoerdvanloon
5 жыл бұрын
@scott boswell, please describe what part is not accurate.
Пікірлер: 30
On the way to the exam, having attended no graph theory lectures but instead watching this. Wish me luck
@sardorbekomonkulov6379
5 жыл бұрын
Damn, same thing here
Thank you so much my year 12 class just introduced graph theory and I had trouble understanding it until now !!!
Awesome presentation! Thanks!
Absolutely stunning, thank you so muxh
Thank you.
anyone know if it is at all possible to get access that NYC subway problem?
Appreciated 👏 thank you man
Can I download the PowerPoint that was used in this video?
very much helpful
thank u
Thank you!
On another book I've read, a path is defined as a sequence of vertices which none repeat. Here, the definition is replacing vertices with edges. With the book definition, making a path would disregard any multiple edges as both vertices connected to the edge would be taken, but with the video definition, the multiple edges are regarded as separate. Which one is right?
Thank youuu
Nice explanation
Thanks 😀
thank you
thanks
I assume when we speak of graph theory we are not talking about graphs of quadratic functions etc etc etc? That would be continuous maths yes?
This is awesome!
Thanks 👍👍
the planarity website does not work anymore :(
Shouldn't a path not repeat vertices.
🖒
Jesus said to him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man comes to the Father, but by me. João 14:6
@octavios8081
5 жыл бұрын
@tucan sam In other words, man must go the path of Jesus in order to reach Father. Thus considering only man, Father has degree 1.
Not very accurate
@sjoerdvanloon
5 жыл бұрын
@scott boswell, please describe what part is not accurate.
thank u
Thanks again