Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_Lq9j4Wz2QHo6dptTW3-tdIo Please click the link to watch our other Swedish Systems videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_LpBbgCM_Ndw0Lq6CMmhBsrp Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends-Land videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_LqHE6H1re0NTbEd4ZnzNCgn

I saw this on a war thunder video and wanted to learn more. Fortunately you guys made a video on it.

@ww1_history_lover

5 ай бұрын

Bland kanon 1c was one of our best tanks in 1967-2003

@superspies32

Ай бұрын

@@ww1_history_lover it still, this shit OVERPENNED everything including HE shells.

Next up the 120mm Lvautomatkanon fm/1 anti-aircraft gun (sometimes called 12 cm lvakan 4501) that fires 47 rounds in about 40 seconds, another Swedish beast😀

@calleskurken9025

Жыл бұрын

Luckily we were smart, not to equip them with world devestaing warheads!

@anderswahlgren9308

11 ай бұрын

@@calleskurken9025 "world devestating"..? You do know that Sweden was developing tactical, NOT strategical nuclear weapons? A strategic bomb would not be able to be launched in something so small.. We were not going to end the world.. Just the invader on the battlefield with small nukes..

Damn, why Swedes armor designs are all so sexy?!

@calleskurken9025

2 ай бұрын

we are not corrupted

@trostlf2699

Ай бұрын

I think they worked together with German Engineers, both tank projects profitted a lot

@vast9467

21 күн бұрын

@@trostlf2699they worked mostly with americans for a lot of their advanced technology iirc

Always good to watch your video..Thanks for wonderful explanation..

Another excellent video. Please more Swedish systems

Now with bigger budgets and rebuilding of capacity it is time for a Bandkanon 2.

@peterlundkvist3221

2 жыл бұрын

There is!

The new Archer system is even mooaar awesome! :-D

@benghazi4216

2 жыл бұрын

Really the best system in the world right now

@dmg4415

2 жыл бұрын

Only one problem with it, to few, thanks to Norway we got doubled up qty, but needs at least 3x more, at least 100 units, and have the ability to cooperate with longer range ammo defending in the coastal positions. And be complemented by more SP 12cm Mortars, and they should look up the LARS systems again, cheap fast and good for area denial. Perferct for the Home Guard forces to deploy against paratroopers, coastal landing areas. Maybe having Anti Tank rounds, to deny tanks access to certain areas. Maybe use the projectiles frm the Grg 48 Carl Gustaf system 84mm but no new ammo, just rockets to prope them and some tubing or lattice to get the airborne. Then You have anto troops, light, smoke, anti tank and what ever there is, maybe 2x6 3x6, range about 7 to 10km accurate out to 7km. They would be small enough to be hauled after a common car or a civilian 4x4 with a couple of reloads on the truckbed, 3 person crew.

@johnnyakerman7000

2 жыл бұрын

@@dmg4415 There will anyway be 72 units soon as they ordered another 24 units in 2021.

@dmg4415

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnnyakerman7000 Good, totally newbuilds or rebuilding of mothballed Haubits 77B?

@johnnyakerman7000

2 жыл бұрын

@@dmg4415 Totally new ones as the Swedish army will establish another artillery regiment, called A9.

Can you imagine modern version of this with GPS guided shells all firing on different positions that would be absolutely insane

Thank you for a great video!

Excellent video about Sewdish self parallel cannon- SPG ( Bandkanon 1 )...made...video successfully coverage its historical- political background creates & clearly explained its characteristics including Sweden 🇸🇪 has atomic shells 🐚 for that battle field cannon...thanks ( weapon detective) for sharing this interesting video

@wobbadubbaskyrim

Жыл бұрын

Sweden never had and probably will never have a nuclear capability, so unfortunately no atomic shells. But is was planned for, and b-kan still have the capability to shoot them. 15 tactical nukes in a minute would have been very poor day for ivan.

what a wonderful video thanks for sharing

she’s a beast!

last time i was this early Russia,Poland,Lithuania, Norway was still a team fighting against Sweden

Bkan 1 was nbc secured when i was in the army. Very good tho. Brg Sweden

great vid

Truly a beautiful machine

The built in ammunition crane was removed and was replaced by ammunition trucks that used their own crane to load the ammunition.

@johanmetreus1268

2 жыл бұрын

Should have included that better in the talks about the 1C upgrade.

Sweden's spam cannon

@gargamelgamingotherstuff6727

2 жыл бұрын

An spam offer you can’t refuse ;)

I Would love to see a modern verson of this.

@JWQweqOPDH

Жыл бұрын

Most modern howitzers have some form of automatic loading and enough burst RoF for MRSI. If you need higher RoF just go with an MLRS.

@moon-kf8tx

Жыл бұрын

There is, the archer spg is the closest thing to the Bandkannon.

I love anything S-Tank chassis

Wait till the end.

3:00 hey look that Christmas tree is moving. Oh my..

👍👍👍👊👊

Father 👨 of the Archer Automatic

Swedes be like, look around you, this is Scandinavia, the largest aircraft carriers in the North Sea, which you cannot have...

i just had a thought, These are really cool, the mite is just dripping, but my thought was, War really sucks. if those who send the young men there had to set foot on the field things would be much different. Bet we wouldn't see a war in that case. Facts!!

2024 it is still the fastest firing artillery SPG in the world 👍🏻 Sweden had 28 systems in service. Some prepared to fire tactical nukes.

💖👍

this one time in bandkamp....

98 plus 2 :)

only if the massive turret of the Bandkanon 1B armoured mobile SPG could rotate 360°deg & a lighter gun was available without compromising the calibre . . .

"Who, who, ... Who you gonna' shoot wit' dat'" -Ice Cube

I want that as an mbt

@WeaponDetective

Жыл бұрын

We may say that the Strv 103 was the MBT variant of the Bandkanon. Here is our Strv 103 video. kzread.info/dash/bejne/Zn2TuM6uZbmdocY.html

@Handle4511

Жыл бұрын

@@WeaponDetective I basically want a combination of an amx 13 105 and bandkannon

I'd still like to see any sources for the claim that the BKan 1 was intended to fire nuclear shells. I am well aware that Sweden looked into the possibility of such shells during the domestic nuclear program, but there it was quickly discarded as it was deemed the cost in relation to the effect was far too high. C-shells was a thing though. While none were produced per se, preparations had been made to have them out at the units within a week from the decision to deploy them was made, shorter if on alert.

@johanmetreus1268

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrFrogLicker69 I think I know which one you are talking about, though I don't recall it citing any sources for those claims.

@JH-lo9ut

Жыл бұрын

Stefan Karlsson at Arsenalen-the Swedish tank museum, makes this claim too, in his video on this weapon. I'd say he is an authority on the matter but I don't think he mentions a source in that video. Anyway, that might be a good place to continue this quest.

My God. 4 of these with nukes could nullify any Soviet threat within a minute.

@calleskurken9025

Жыл бұрын

Luckily we were smart, not to equip them with world devestaing warheads!

PUM- PUM- PUM LET'S GOBACK TO MY ROOM SO WE CAN DO IT ALL NIGHT AND I CAN MAKE IT ALLRIGHT, PUM - PUM PUM LET'S GO BACK TO MY ROOM 15 PROJECTILES? C'MON MAN, YOU NEED TO INCREASE THE MAGAZINE TO 52 PER PACK, DO THE DID SOLID

Wait till the same

That's big mistake to retired this gun instead upgrade it year by year

@benghazi4216

2 жыл бұрын

We don't feel that way when we got Archer now

@kimnilsson7501

2 жыл бұрын

@@benghazi4216 But only 48. Why ditch 77B?

@benghazi4216

2 жыл бұрын

@@kimnilsson7501 The question is more, why only 48. But sure, if we are only having 48 archers, we could at least keep some of these older 77B. Maybe for Gotland since they are so hard to move around.

@kimnilsson7501

2 жыл бұрын

@@benghazi4216 Only 48 is about the cost. But the cost for keep a lot of the 77B was next to nothing. Even old canons kill...

@Paulwalken1993

3 ай бұрын

I’d think modernizing this for improved mobility and range would have paired well with the archer. You could have the archer for longer range, higher mobility, and higher precision strikes while having a platform operate simultaneously for the purpose of mass volumes of fire. I think if they had kept evolving and improvi the Bandkanon 1 it would have ended up being similar to the South Korean K9 Thunder but with a higher rate of fire.

So a "gun" is less better than a "howitzer"?? Why??

@habahan4257

2 жыл бұрын

Different from field guns, the howitzers have higher elevation angles. So they can fire a round to longer range and they can also act as a mortar

@oneshot2028

2 жыл бұрын

@@habahan4257 What about gun-howtizers?? Will that solve this issue??

@habahan4257

2 жыл бұрын

@@oneshot2028 The gun-howitzers have direct fire capability like the field guns. The direct fire capability of the ordinary howitzers is practically useless.

@oneshot2028

2 жыл бұрын

@@habahan4257 So why don't militaries make gun-howitzers?? They can serve both purposes, right???

@habahan4257

2 жыл бұрын

@@oneshot2028 Because it is complex and expensive. Many armies do not have the direct gun fire concept for artillery. The anti-tank missiles, tank guns, etc enough for direct fire support.

जय श्री राम..

Nato wasnt a threat , Sweden yad agreement with US for cooparation and landing strips to be used in case of war.

Send to Ukraine 😁

take it from your bias, that you are Swedish.

you should be scared... as Swede i want peaople whom from diffrent religion. i want diveristy

NATO invade Sweden ? What are you smoking?

@MrCastodian

Жыл бұрын

It was a possibility, not that NATO were an enemy, but if things went south they could possibly invade Sweden to stop So jet in the north. This is what Sweden prepared for.

@fredrikkhoffman

Жыл бұрын

@@MrCastodian See what you mean. I reacted to the term "invade" which may not be the most accurate.