So inspiring ,thanks for making this available for everybody .We all need more of this in our lives these days. I had been interested on Rosicrucians since my teenage years ,because my grandfather and many things he was involved and his bookshelf filled with this amazing stuff,I didn't know what was about (and I am still learning ) until I was on my late 20s . A lot of things make more sense now,love this,again Thanks so much LVX Luna

Only when studying Shakespeare at university I realised the complexity of his language, especially the sea of legal, and very specific law metaphors which permeate his work. Only a person of law could have had or used that vocabulary, and that just happens to be Francis Bacon, and not William Shakespeare. Even if Shakespeare was a supremely self taught individual, the kind of language used in sonnets would have come only from a legal professional. Anyone who understands the creative process will understand this. It is very simple.

The Secret Bard by Michael Taylor "Truth can never be reached by just listening to the voice of an authority." -- Francis Bacon "But when I searched, I found no work so meritorious as the discovery and development of the arts and inventions that tend to civilise the life of man." -- Francis Bacon "That extra-ordinary genius, when it was impossible to write a history of what was known, wrote one of what it was necessary to learn." -- on Bacon Elizabethan England was anything but a free society. Like Continental Europe at the time, the authority of the Monarchies and the Church was undisputed. Sovereigns held the power of life or death over their subjects. Authorities encouraged informers - spies - to hand in heretics and political radicals, who were then tortured into confessions before their executions. England was split over religion, and its coming renaissance was but a flicker in the minds of a tiny learned elite. In the midst of this unstable background, Elizabeth 1 came to the throne in 1558. By the time Charles I succeeded to the Throne in 1625, English language had been transformed, and English commerce and trade led the world. America was being colonized, and foundations had been laid for a revolution in political thought and science. W.T. Smedley, a Bacon biographer, states: "From 1576 to 1623 the English language was made the finest examples of its capacities which today exist: But the knowledge and wisdom possessed by the classical writers, the histories of the principal nations of the world, practically everything that was worth knowing in the literature of other countries, were for the first time made available in the English tongue." ring to bring about a revolution along the lines of Bacon's thought. They acquainted Bacon with mystery traditions like Gnosticism, the Egyptian mysteries and the Knight Templars, which influenced his later writings. So Bacon's subsequent political career in the Elizabethan Parliament and under James I was as much of a sideshow to the vast philosophical undertaking he had set himself as his practice as a lawyer. Even so, he represented many constituencies, notably the foremost seat of Middlesex, and later simultaneously St. Albans, Ipswich and Cambridge. Bacon is the only person in History to be a member of the House of Lords and the House of Commons at the same time. In Parliament he served on no less than 29 committees, and was regarded as one of the most eloquent orators ever to have stood before the House of Commons. Yet he saw that omnipotent Government was not the answer. "The truth can never be reached by listening to the voice of authority", said Bacon. He opposed subsidies for business and Government granted monopolies. In 1589 Bacon moved that a subsidy bill (a taxation bill) to give monies to the Queen be extraordinary, in other words be meant for war and only for war. The amendment was passed thus finally establishing the base for the eventual ascendancy of Parliament over the Crown. In 1593, under the threat of imprisonment by Elizabeth, Bacon again spoke against the Crown's encroachment on the right of the House of Commons to set taxation levels. Bacon believed the amount asked for would press heavily on the poor and many would not be able to pay it. Bacon won against the Crown, and secured for the English freedom of speech in their own Parliament and the right of the Commons to set the amount of supply to the Crown.10 Bacon spoke against feudal privileges and opposed the enclosure of common lands by land-owners. He also proposed to alter the language of the laws to make them accessible to the common man. "Laws are made to guard the rights of the people, not to feed lawyers.", said Bacon in Parliament. Francis fought in Parliament for union with the Scots to increase the strength of England against threats from the continent, and pushed for expansion of colonization in America, notably Newfoundland and Virginia. 11 He was respected by all, mainly for his virtue, but held in jealousy by his enemies like the hunchback Robert Cecil, who knew the real secret of his birth and desired to keep him down. Under James I, Bacon rose in 1606 to Solicitor-General, in 1613 achieved the post of Attorney-General. In 1618 he became Lord Chancellor of England, until his fall from public office in 1621 after being framed by his Parliamentary colleague and nemesis from Elizabethan times, Edward Coke. 12 Bacon's Philosophy Bacon's method for permeating his philosophical ideas into the collective unconscious of the age can best be summarized in his motto: bene visit qui bene latuit - One lives best by the hidden life. Bacon resurrected the Rosicrucian Mystery school and the Freemasons, and injected new life into these secret fraternity societies so they became vehicles for the new Baconian philosophy of reason and scientific inquiry. Bacon, like Goethe, scorned knowledge that did not lead to action and also scorned the denial of evil in ourselves. Bacon was grateful to Machiavelli for his frank appraisal of the shadow side of human nature in politics: "We are beholden to Machiavelli, and writers of that kind, who openly and unmasked declare what men do in fact, and not what they ought to do; for it is impossible to join the wisdom of the serpent and the innocence of the dove, without the precious knowledge of the nature of evil." 13 Bacon's works touch on all aspects of humanity - politics, religion, theology, scientific method, but his most brilliant observations are psychological. Foreshadowing the discoveries by Carl Jung about the nature of the unconscious and the shadow side of man, Bacon recognized that the baseness of man should be recognized and dealt with openly, not repressed and personified as the devil. In modern political vernacular, Bacon was a conservative. He saw an ideal Government as one which was benevolent without the worst excesses of despotism by rulers, or by the majority. "It is almost without instance that any government was unprosperous under learned governors." 14 Bacon had a goal to be that Governor - a philosopher-king - as Francis 1 of England, until Elizabeth's death ended this dream. In science, Bacon sought nothing less than the reconstruction of a system that could be applied to the relief of man's suffering. He constructed a new Classification of Science (The Advancement of Learning, 1603-05), described a new method for the Interpretation of Nature (Things Thought and Seen, 1607, Thread of the Labyrinth, 1606, Novum Organum, 1608-20). He investigated the phenomena of nature in Natural History (1622), and showed how the writers of the past had advanced their truths to the time of Bacon in Forest of Forests, published in 1624. Bacon recorded "anticipations" of scientific results he felt would come from application of his methods in On Origins (1621). As a result of applying these principles, he described the basis of a new society that would emerge in The New Atlantis (1624). This Magna Instauratio, the great reconstruction, was inspired by the vision Bacon had in his youth, and was a Herculean task without precedent in the history of thought. As Bacon stated in the preface to Magna Instauratio. "and I am laboring to lay the foundation not of any sect or doctrine, but of utility and power". To Bacon, "Knowledge is power, not mere argument or ornament." In Advancement of Learning, Bacon suggested that all areas of life had rational rules and an empirical basis: medicine, psychology, even dreams, predictions and other occult phenomena. Yet he comes full circle at the end of this survey, concluding that science needs to be guided by philosophy. Bacon applies this to politics. The pursuit of politics becomes a destructive bedlam when divorced from science and philosophy, in other words from rationality and higher goals. So Bacon suggested the organization of science itself, of communication between centers of learning to share research and resources, and of royal patronage of the sciences. A direct result was the Royal Society in Britain, formed with the financial support of the Crown. Novum Organum The Novum Organum represents the summit of Francis Bacon's open works. It was to introduce a new method of logic to learning, to replace the old ways which had borne so little fruit. He pointed to errors in thought that had to be corrected in order for man to advance. The first was that experience of the world should have primacy, not the realities - or misconceptions - the minds of men held. Observation was to be the cornerstone of scientific method. The second error that he observed was the fact that different men look at the same experience in different ways: we filter reality to suit our present state, not seeing what is really there. Thirdly, Bacon saw the inappropriate and careless use of language as an enemy to true understanding. Lastly, Bacon saw errors in looking at the world through the eyes of other philosophers. Plato's world says more about Plato than the world, for instance. It remains for Francis Bacon to explain the scientific method of inquiry - experimentation and observation. By accumulating data, says Bacon, we come to the form of the phenomena, its essence. The modern secular age of science was foreshadowed in The New Atlantis, the story of an island utopia in the Pacific where science prevailed over ignorance and superstition in all spheres of human life. Politically, the island has no elections, no ruler, just a learned council of men who have proven themselves by scientific achievement. In other words, a government without politicians. Most of the time these "rulers" were engaged in trying to control nature rather than their fellow man. The Future of Liberty Bacon, aware that his philosophy and schemes were not perfect, nevertheless laid the foundation for a new age of secular wisdom. When the Royal Society was formed in 1662, the founders named Bacon as their model and inspiration. The great minds of the French Enlightenment dedicated their masterpiece cyclopdie to Francis Bacon. Diderot said of him "That extra-ordinary genius, when it was impossible to write a history of what was known, wrote one of what it was necessary to learn." Will Durant states in The Story of Philosophy: "The whole tenor and career of British thought have followed the philosophy of Bacon. The inductive method gave John Locke the idea of an empirical psychology, bound by observation and freed from theology and metaphysics; and his emphasis on "commodities" and "fruits" found formulation in [Jeremy] Bentham's identification of the useful and the good." 15 Edmund Burke was also greatly influenced by the Lord Chancellor: "Genius the most profound, of literature the most extensive, of discovery the most penetrating, of observation of human life the most distinguished and refined." 16 Thomas Jefferson was also profoundly influenced by Bacon's writings, and Jefferson himself thought he was fulfilling Bacon's dreams as summarized in "The New Atlantis" by founding the United States. Biographer Hepworth Dixon summarizes the contribution Bacon's open works made to our world: "The obligations of the world to Francis Bacon are of a kind that cannot be overlooked. Every man who rides in a train, who sends a telegram, who follows a steam plough, who sits in an easy chair, who crosses the channel or the Atlantic, who eats a good dinner, who enjoys a beautiful garden, or undergoes a painless surgical operation, OWES HIM SOMETHING. "To him the patriot, the statesman, the law reformer, the scientific jurist, the historian, the collector of anecdote, the lover of good wit, of humorous wisdom and of noble writing, also OWES HIM SOMETHING." 17 A guiding spirit behind the schemes of Raleigh and others to set fledging colonies on an untamed continent, Francis Bacon was tireless in lobbying the King and his fellow countrymen to explore and colonize America. And under the pen-name Shakespeare, Bacon had the most significant effect on English literature of any single person in history. He literally recreated the entire English language, writing the greatest literary works of the Western World. It is without precedent that one man could achieve so much in one life. But to Bacon can be credited the groundwork for our modern age of reason, science and liberty in the West. "No Age hath ever Wits refined so fat, And yet she calms them by her Policy: To Her THY SON must make his SACRIFICE If he will have the Morning of his Eyes." Sir Francis Bacon writing a sonnet to his Mother, Queen Elizabeth I, 1596.

@maryhinge5876

7 жыл бұрын

Where is the rest of this documentary ?

@floranderson2251

6 жыл бұрын

FRANCIS BACON WAS OCCULTIST SATANIST' HE IS THE ONE THAT FOUNDED THE UNITED STATES'

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

Bacon did help found and colonize Carolina and Virginia , the first land areas discovered by the English. He also founded Freemasonry which became the secret cult of the US Founding Fathers and many Presidents since to present times. Bush, Clinton and Obama being among them. My book The Royal Secret traces the orgins from the Egyptian Masons to Christ to the Templars to the Rosicrucians and Freemasons. Lucifer was originally an angel whose reputation was corrupted by King David and King Solomon's greed for wealth and so was seen as the Devil. Freemasonry stemmed from the Templars and practised its own rites of a secular non-religious nature and so was suspected and accused by the Catholic Church as being evil. see www.theroyalsecret.info to discover the truth.

@floranderson2251

6 жыл бұрын

EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS WERE BUILT BY GIANTS' Every religion on Earth was created by the ancestors of these same royal and elite masters as a means of controlling their slave population. They attempt to make certain that Biblical prophesy comes true by manipulating world events. You are told that you are a free people but if you are not one of them then you are one of their slaves. If you were born into great wealth or into the known current royal bloodlines and educated by the Bilderberg Family you are one of them. For the majority this is not the case. Because of their great size we treated our captors as gods. Skeletons of these 39-foot tall “gods” have consistently and historically been excavated by farmers, miners and archeologists around the world. This has been intentionally concealed from our view by our masters. Earth and our universe is just one of many universes and planets populated by humans. Not all human races appear as we do because we have been experimented on by our slave masters throughout the centuries. They have altered our DNA so that we cannot evolve properly. These modifications and chemicals introduced into our bodies have retarded our natural ability to communicate with all life - to read minds and communicate telepathically. When we die we reincarnate into another new-born child and live the experience all over again. Most of us have reincarnated thousands of times. This happens because of an electronic field about ten miles high in our atmosphere that prevents our ethereal bodies from leaving. FREEMASONS MAKE HUMAN SACRIFICES TO MOLOCH' IMPERIALISTS WARS ARE HUMAN SACRIFICES TO SATAN A NEPHILIM '

@floranderson2251

6 жыл бұрын

WHEREABOUT SARAH WINCHESTER? THE OWNER OF WINCHESTER RIFLES' SHE WAS OCCULTIST'

Hence where "what's shaking bacon?" comes from lol

@Jeffhowardmeade

3 жыл бұрын

About the most intelligent comment made on this page.

@bn2816

Жыл бұрын

Bacon also invented the cake

@tauruschorus

Жыл бұрын

Underrated comment 😂

@pyneel8954

Жыл бұрын

Spot on

Excellent summation of the large body of evidence Mr.Wycliffe! Indeed you seem to follow in the fine scholarly tradition of your ancestral namesake ( I am guessing?)

THE MASONIC CODE OF SHAKE-SPEARES SONNETS' If you’re not already aware, there exists much controversy and debate over who actually wrote the works attributed to the highly mysterious author known as “William Shakespeare”. Yes, the vast majority of people on the planet have generally (and unknowingly) accepted the premise that a man named “William Shakespeare” (of Stratford) wrote the literary works attributed to him. The problem rests with the fact that there is scarce evidence of the Stratford man’s existence-but more importantly, there is NO TANGIBLE EVIDENCE the “Stratford man” wrote the literary body of work for which he is given credit-in fact, there is a mountain of hard, legitimate evidence to the contrary! As extraordinary as it may seem, there is an avalanche of substantial evidence that reveals Francis Bacon to be the true genius behind the creation of the Shakespearean works! The evidence further reveals Bacon to have been the first (secret) son of Queen Elizabeth I. Moreover, the evidence also shows Bacon to have been the founder of modern, Speculative Freemasonry. The Shakespearean works consist of a vast infrastructure of encryption-all of which rely on the precision and beauty of Numbers. The hard evidence overwhelmingly shows that Francis Bacon artfully wove coded numbers into the Shakespearean tapestry not just as an amusement, but rather as a vehicle intended to serve as a paradigm of enlightenment designed to move the reader to much higher levels of understanding! Categorically the cryptic “Shakespeare Sonnets” are at the apex of the Shakespeare Treasure Trail because they are understood by the vast majority of Shakespearean scholars to represent the Author’s Autobiography. It is generally assumed that “1609” was the year in which SHAKE-SPEARES SONNETS was first published. However, as Edward D. Johnson has effectively demonstrated (refer to: www.sirbacon.org/Sonnet/intro.html), 1609 is a code number rather than a publication date. Therefore, 1609 is a false publication date. Johnson states: “In 1609 anything written by Shakespeare was in great demand-the quartos of the plays were reprinted over and over again.” “If these Sonnets had been published in 1609 then there would have been so great a demand for the work of a popular writer as Shakespeare that this book of Sonnets would have been reprinted again and again. Why was it not reprinted? Because it was not originally printed in 1609. The absence of reprints is a problem which has never been explained by the Stratfordians [or by the Oxfordians].” “There is absolutely no mention of the Sonnets as a complete body of verse or any phrase or quotation in letters, diaries, printed book or pamphlet between the years 1609 and 1624, a period of 15 years. This book was not seen by the public until 1640, when an edition was printed, 31 years after 1609.” Finally, Johnson concludes: “That there was neither printed nor published any book entitled Shake-Speare’s Sonnets in 1609 is also proved by the fact that there is no reference to this book by any Shakespearian commentator between the years 1609 and 1640.” The hard evidence unequivocally establishes the original publication of the Shakespeare Sonnets could not have occurred prior to 1621. All 154 sonnets and their accompanying “cover pages” are heavily encrypted with Bacon’s Kabbalistic Masonic code-clearly, nothing about them can be taken at face value. .

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Flor anderson The famous actor Edward Alleyn bought a copy of Shaksper (sic) Sonnets in 1609 for 5d. The book was printed by G. Eld, using the same case of type he used to typeset other books he printed about the same time. A case of type in a busy print shop didn't last twelve years. There's an old saying that goes something like: "You can't indoctrinate the informed."

@IgnisCygnus147

5 жыл бұрын

Are you familar with john dee or Dan winters work on him!?!

Bacon was almost an exile by being overlooked for his deceased father's post as Elizabeth's confidante and for a few kings to come. He had no access during Shakespearian times to a female courtier instructional manual or the living names used as characters revealed throughout beautifully aggressive feminine content of the plays, devoid as he was of any notion of love and romance.

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

Mr. Mando Mohan, your understanding is greatly flawed. You have completely misread the times. Please delve a little deeper. Full fathoms five deeper, maybe?

Francis Bacon is the real William Shakespeare "Shakes a spear"

Solzhenitsyn tells us, “by the computations of the emigrated statistics professor Kurganov, this ‘relatively light’ suppression that ran from the beginning of the October Revolution through 1950 cost us [Russians] about 66 million human lives.” [GULAG Archipelago, p. 37]

The study of Kabbalah was a long time practice and the cause of one of the three inquisitions in Europe. Even Roger Bacon was a very fine Kabbalah practitioner and entertained the King & Queen in their court performing magic. The Bruton Vault may be interesting to find!?

1750 AD Jacob Frank (1726-1791), a Shabbatai Kabbalist successor, expanded upon Zevi’s occult philosophy with “Frankism” almost 100 years later. He called it Frankism, claiming also to be the Jewish Messiah with 50,000 Jewish followers from Poland & Eastern Europe. Frank claimed that “all laws and teachings will fall” and every boundary will fall and Jews will rule the world. Frankism is commonly associated with Sabbateanism which also violated traditional Jewish teachings even engaging in orgies used in their rituals. Frank as messiah, pretended to be Christian, established a miniature royal court and selected twelve female disciples - his concubines and twelve male disciples as his missionaries. But the Archduchess of Vienna began to suspect that Frank was not a Christian but a Jew in Christian clothing - Frank was excommunicated by Jewish rabbis and Polish Catholics and expelled from Vienna. Frank finally ended up in prison for 13 years. Frank, like Zevi, performed “strange acts” that violated traditional religious taboos, such as eating fats forbidden by Jewish dietary laws, ritual sacrifice, and promoting orgies and sexual immorality. He often slept with his followers & Slept with his own daughter & Preached that the best way to imitate God was to violate every taboo & mix the sacred with the evil. Professor Gershom Scholem called Frank, “one of the most frightening phenomena in the whole of Jewish history”. 1776 AD Amazingly, the Rothschilds banker syndicate under Meyer Amshel Rothschild, even formed an alliance with Jacob Frank’s organization and Adam Weishaupt (1748-1830) who he appointed to found the new Order called the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776, and that timing corresponded with Rothschilds funding of the American Revolution, like the French Revolution the Rothschilds funded later. .

At one point 9:16 it is stated that ONLY Francis Bacon could've authored the works of Shakespeare, and then seconds later the theory that the works were written collaboratively by a group of Francis Bacon's peers is also proffered. Everything mentioned in this video attributing the works to Bacon is merely circumstantial, the same, however, cannot be said of all the (albeit cryptic) allusions made by contemporaries of the author, inferring that Edward DeVere the 17th Earl of Oxford was the true author, not to mention the very specific parallels between events in the life of DeVere and many plot points within the plays of the Bard. Please see Alexander Waugh's amazing KZread channel for evidence of this.

@Jeffhowardmeade

3 жыл бұрын

Waugh just makes it up as he goes. In that, he's like every other Anti-Stratfordian. At least he's in rare (as in scarce, not as in elite) company.

In 1592, Robert Greene wrote about an "upstart crow" who thought that he could "bombast out a blank verse as the best of you." He then puns on the name Shakespeare stating that this writer thinks he is the "only Shake-scene in a country." Greene is referring to William Shakespeare.

What is the name of the television program this clip comes from please?

@Genesisone29

2 жыл бұрын

one of the Secret History of America www.noiseofthunderradio.com/dvds/

What documentary is this from? I'd like to watch it.

@Genesisone29

7 жыл бұрын

Secret Mysteries of America's Beginnings www.amazon.com/Secret-Mysteries-Americas-Beginnings-Atlantis/dp/B000FIGJ84 www.amazon.com/Riddles-Stone-Beginnings-Architecture-Washington/dp/B000P2XNBG/ref=pd_bxgy_74_2/160-1523559-4640352?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B000P2XNBG&pd_rd_r=T5PSZHV644BSH4JKZ61K&pd_rd_w=3dtCf&pd_rd_wg=rSlH7&psc=1&refRID=T5PSZHV644BSH4JKZ61K www.amazon.com/Eye-Phoenix-Secrets-Dollar-Bill/dp/B001QXWFMQ/ref=pd_bxgy_74_3/160-1523559-4640352?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B001QXWFMQ&pd_rd_r=T5PSZHV644BSH4JKZ61K&pd_rd_w=3dtCf&pd_rd_wg=rSlH7&psc=1&refRID=T5PSZHV644BSH4JKZ61K

Bacon was the student of paolo sarpi, all roads leads to Venice

The Prank of the Face: Unmasking the “Droeshout” Portrait of William Shakespeare' In 1977, art historian and pioneer computer artist Lillian Schwartz made a remarkable observation with potentially far-reaching implications for the Shakespeare authorship debate. She took a copy of the famous “Droeshout” portrait of William Shakespeare which appears in the First Folio of 1623, and scanned it into her computer. Then she did the same with a portrait of Queen Elizabeth 1. She overlaid the two images one on top of the other, scaling them to the same size. Then, adjusting their relative transparency so that they could be readily compared, she noticed something very strange: there were certain portions of the Shakespeare portrait which exactly reproduced the features of Elizabeth. It was not a question of an approximate copy, or a close facsimile, or a loose likeness. There was an exact reproduction of the key sections. Her discovery, extraordinary as it appears to be, seems to have attracted almost no commentary in the intervening years. It’s perhaps not hard to see why. There does not seem to be any obvious reason why a portrait of Shakespeare should share elements of a portrait of Elizabeth. I must admit that when I first heard of this discovery, my initial reaction was to dismiss it out of hand as too ridiculous to contemplate. The internet is awash with foolish claims of identity between different people based on dubious photo-shop manipulations, wishful thinking and outright stupidity. This claim, I thought when I first heard about it, no doubt fell directly into such a category. That, however, was before I looked at the superimposed images for myself.

Pretty smart of Bacon to write sonnet 145 to Anne Hathaway.

@Jeffhowardmeade

3 жыл бұрын

And to repeatedly say "my name is Will", in case nobody made the connection to the guy's name on the title page.

@ryanparker4996

Жыл бұрын

​@@Jeffhowardmeade "willc has a double meaning. Its folly to take poems at their face value.

@Jeffhowardmeade

Жыл бұрын

@@ryanparker4996 You are correct. One of those meanings is a proper noun

If Bacon really did write the plays, then Hamlet should be called 'The Danish Bacon Play'.

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

Bacon was called Hamlet by his mother, Elizabeth 1st, as a term of endearment when he was young. His earlier version was called Ur Hamlet written when he was 18 and after he had visited Denmark.

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Jay Bee And so he wrote a play where he dies after accidentally poisoning said mother and killing the husband she didn't have. That's so fucking brilliant I wonder why some sane person didn't think it up first.

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

Bacon had a love hate relationship with the Queen who denied him his right to the throne. Ur Hamlet written when Bacon was 18 to have a poke at his mother was stopped in its tracks after its first performance by Bacon's father, Dudley, and not shown again as a much revised Hamlet until after the Queen's death .

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Jay Bee Q1 of Hamlet was entered into the Stationer's Register in 1602 while she was still alive. It had been performed in public before typesetting began, which means it was also performed while she was alive. The facts once again declare you to be full of shit.

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

I have said it was performed as Ur Hamlet years before and was stopped by Dudley before Elizabeth could get to hear of it. She was ill and part demented in 1602 so very unlikely its registration would have come to her ears. When its amended version was finally performed she was dead, and it was because of the effect it might have had on her and the consequent danger to Bacon that it was postponed for many years until her death. I find your language objectionable. You are obviously incapable of discussion without abuse not even bothering to check the facts. I will not respond to any future abusive comments from you.

Valentinus, a Greek (100 AD-160 AD), and likely Jewish, was best known and for a time most successful early Christian gnostic theologian. He became connected with the Christian church, probably to get ahead. But he was bitter as he thought he would become a Roman bishop but was rejected, he drifted into open heresy & founded his own school in Rome becoming the first to invent “Christian” Gnosticism around 130 AD. Ridiculously, he claimed that he had received instruction from a follower of Paul, but we know many followers of Paul followers fell away and are said to have tried to shipwrecked the Christian Faith, serving as wolves in sheep’s clothing by spreading falsehoods with no eyewitnesses left to repudiate false claims. Unfortunately for Valentinus and his Jewish followers, the Christian Apostles writings had been well established for over 80 years and so their Gnostic writings were widely rejected. But these Jewish writers, probably frustrated not being rabbis, continued writing a whole new fraudulent Christian literature loaded with falsehoods all the way to at least 300 AD, with real Christian writers refuting their efforts. Orthodox leaders feared that Gnostic cults would deceive members of their flocks and lead them away from their growing church (to hell and into the arms of Satan). The resultant battles helped remake the church by increased emphasis on apostolic teachings, a tightening of the church hierarchy, and holding strictly to Scriptures. When the Gnostic cult could not prove their validity they lost credibility, but the rabbis continued building the 30+ volumes of the TALMUD which is full of cult and anti-Christian theories and laws. It was certainly reasonable to expect the new Gnostic cult to prove itself and defend its emerging practices, but their opponents of won the war as the Christian scholars argued the Gnostics were heretics who invented myths about Christ, human origins, and blasphemed and created new gospels at whim. Gnostic documents prove the Christian scholars were correct about the folly and propaganda of the Gnostics. The Gnostics even forged the Gospel of Judas to make Judas the greatest of the apostles because he helped Jesus achieve liberation from his body (via murder). They wrote other fraudulent and perverse versions of the Apostles and books of the New Testament only to be discovered as forgeries. Gnostics made out that the books were written by apostles or other famous figures from the Gospels and Acts. .

Man u I can't wait to talk with and take a shot

Where is all this leading? Watch Megiddo 1 & 2 from Adullam Films. Listen to the talk given by Constance Cumbey.

@Holy_hand-grenade

7 жыл бұрын

Ruth Allan how stupid

People who are interested in the Shakespeare authorship question may like to know that there is also a Jane Austen authorship question. In my book "Jane Austen - a New Revelation" I show that the true author of the Jane Austen novels was her cousin, Eliza de Feuillide. She could not publish under her own name because she was the illegitimate daughter of Warren Hastings, the Governor General of India.

@Jeffhowardmeade

3 жыл бұрын

Have you managed to sell ten copies yet? I mean, aside from the ones your family bought.

Two very pious men stood at the outset of the Order of the Knights Templar: Hugues of Payens and Geoffroy de St. Omer, a Frank and a Norman. They collected a group of friends spirited by a faith typical of the Middle Ages, a faith so powerful that we can hardly imagine it today. Christmas 1117 this small circle decided to form a group for the protection of pilgrims in Jerusalem. It was their only wish to serve the Lord Jesus Christ and the faith. The group, now grown to nine knights, stood rather alone - they had no protection, nor adequate funds. Next spring the group went to Baldwin I, Latin king of Jerusalem, and to the patriarch. Their intent was lauded, and - after having lived in the “German House”, a hospital run by Germans - they were soon given quarters on the ancient site of the Temple. And although this earned them the name of KNIGHTS TEMPLAR, they always understood themselves to be the BROTHERS OF THE TRUE TEMPLE OF Christ by which they meant to INNER TEMPLE OF THE SOUL. The history of the Templars would be quite different and probably rather unimportant had they no discovered in the ruins of the Temple a rather remarkable find the Knights did not at first know what to do with: These were remains of Hebrew writings, small scraps really, but whose contents would soon become of utmost importance to the Templars and the Order’s history from then on.

Friedrich Nietzsche also believed that Bacon was the real author of Shakespeare's plays. That statement coming from a gifted professor, trained in classical philology, should be taken into consideration.

@Jeffhowardmeade

7 жыл бұрын

Like Mark Twain, Henry James, Sigmund Freud and the rest of the 19th Century Anti-stratfordians, Nietzsche had no access to the piles of evidence we have today which demonstrates that William Shakespeare was the poet who wrote his own works. The first published collection of documents relating to William Shakespeare didn't occur until 1940. The first complete collection, by Schoenbaum, didn't come about until fifty years ago.

@alexdavinci9533

7 жыл бұрын

Caius Martius Coriolanus​​ Right. Because Shakespeare left posterity an abundance of written material that clearly showed who he really was! Even after a hundred years, some people still believe that Bacon was really Shakespeare. Personally, I think the evidence is missing to make that conclusion. But who knows, right? Marlowe shouldn't be dismissed as "the real Shakespeare" candidate.

@Jeffhowardmeade

7 жыл бұрын

Alex da Vinci Shakespeare didn't have to leave an abundance of written material that clearly showed who he was. Many others left it for him. Heaps and piles of it. So much so that all but a handful of nutters are convinced by it.

@alexdavinci9533

7 жыл бұрын

+Caius Martius Coriolanus Aside from the plays and written testimonies from his contemporaries, I wished there was a single letter from the man. At least one that proved his identity.

@Jeffhowardmeade

7 жыл бұрын

+Alex da Vinci Don't we all! We have to keep our expectations within reason, however. Shakespeare's family line died out in 1670, and by the time anyone went looking for his relics, his houses and theaters had all been destroyed. If he wrote letters to any noblemen, they had an outside chance of being preserved. Most noble family lines from Shakespeare's day have petered out and most of their grand homes are now ruins. Were it not for Ben Jonson writing two begging letters to government officials to be let out of jail, we'd have none from him. Had Edward Alleyn not dumped all of his and his father-in-law's papers in a chest and left them to the school he founded, and had they been rediscovered before relic hunting became a thing, we wouldn't have Henslowe's Diary, which is our primary source for information about most of Shakespeare's contemporaries. The one letter we have written TO Shakespeare only survives because it's author was mayor and died in office, so the contents of his desk got filed away for 150 years. And, of course, the primary ingredient for rag paper was used rag paper. The people of Shakespeare's age recycled! It's a miracle we have anything at all.

The Apostle Paul (6 AD- 64 AD) Born a Roman citizen to Jewish parents in Tarsus (eastern Turkey) and studied the Torah in Jerusalem and becomes a member of self-rightous Jewish Pharisee. At around age 30 he is converted to preach Jesus as Messiah. At age 43 at the Council of Jerusalem, Paul argues successfully that Gentile Christians can ignore Jewish law. He does much of his writing by age 51. At age 51 he is arrested in Jerusalem and imprisoned. At age 54 under house arrest in Rome, he writes letters to Philippians, Ephesians, Colossians, and Philemon. And at age 56 in Spain he writes letters to Timothy and Titus and is martyred at age 58. .

Thank you so much for posting this. I couldn't find anything in the comments but if anyone can answer this, I'd appreciate it: If Pallas Athena was the reason Bacon came up with the pseudonym "Shake-Speare" as shaking the spear at the eyes of ignorance, how is it then such a huge coincidence that there happened to be an actor in Stratford named "William Shakespeare?" Or is it that the actor's name WASN'T William Shakespeare? Or that the actor never existed at all?

@Jeffhowardmeade

7 жыл бұрын

King James thought he existed when he made him a groom of the chamber. The College of Heralds thought he was real when they issued him a coat of arms and declared him a gentleman. Ben Jonson thought he was real when he listed Shakespeare as an actor in two of his plays. The list goes on and on. He was real, and he was in the acting company which exclusively performed plays attributed to Shakespeare. If there were, by coincidence, two of them, you would think someone would have remarked upon it.

@animinasyan3788

7 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for your answer. I thought as much. I'm a Stratfordian myself so I wanted to see one of the many holes that could be poked in the Baconian theory. Thanks, again!

@GregJay

7 жыл бұрын

So you believe once you believe something then instead of finding out the truth you have to defend the belief. Better to know the truth than defend a belief.

@Jeffhowardmeade

7 жыл бұрын

GregJay Panem Et Circensis Since everything I wrote were facts, she now does know the truth.

@Sidionian

7 жыл бұрын

I think it's weak to simply argue that just because somebody's name matches the pseudonym of the writer, they must be one and the same. There is far too much evidence to demonstrate that the Stratfordian ape didn't have an intellect to write home about. "Wow, his name matches that signed on the works. IT MUST BE TRUE!!" Think again.

"Francis Bacon knew absolutely NOTHING about leather I suspect!"

@Jeffhowardmeade

Жыл бұрын

If he had, he would have written about it, like he did for nearly everything else.

How is Apollo a shaker of the spear?

Was Saint Germain Sir Francis Bacon in a past life?.

He was DeVere17

@Jeffhowardmeade

4 жыл бұрын

De Vere didn't even know he was 17. He thought he was 16.

Bacon founded the Rosy Cross Literary Society, which sponsored the publication of the Sonnets in 1640, using John Benson as the printer. This publication brought attention to the edition of 1609, which had been quickly suppressed. Bacon also put several symbols in the engraving of Shakespeare in that edition, including a sprig of acacia, sacred to both Freemasons and Rosicrucians as a symbol of immortality or resurrection. See my articles on the subject in the Rose Croix Journal. Helen Heightsman Gordon, author of THE SECRET LOVE STORY IN SHAKESPEARE'S SONNETS.

@Jeffhowardmeade

7 жыл бұрын

For a document which was supposedly "quickly suppressed", we seem to have a lot of extant copies of it. Oxford, Manchester, the Folger, the Huntington, the British Library. There are more copies of the Sonnets floating around than there are for most early editions of Shakespeare quartos. The 1640 Sonnets were printed from original manuscripts, and not from the 1609 edition. Eight sonnets are missing, two follow the text of The Passionate Pilgrim, and the rest are in a completely different order. If some secret society were responsible for both editions, you would expect them to be the same.

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

Excellent insight Helen H. Gordon!

Bacon wrote Hamlet for sure

@Jeffhowardmeade

3 жыл бұрын

Bacon...Ham...I see what you did there.

Edmondson 18:55: A kids skin stretches, stretches and stretches? How Bizarre

@Jeffhowardmeade

3 жыл бұрын

It's called chevre, and it's made from goat hides. It is very supple and stretchy and is perfect for making gloves. Shakespeare's father just happened to be a leather worker and glove maker.

His father' s name was John Shakespeare so where do they get the idea that the name was made up as a nom de plume for the author of the plays ?

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

Mr. Mahoney, if you check the historical sources, you will find that the fathers name was Shaksper! So close to the athenian godess's title that it was deemed appropriate for a" Good Play on Words"! A sense of humour is necessary in comprehending the whole Bacon-Shakespeare conundrum, which is something severely lacking in orthodox scholarship. Hence they can never pierce the veil! After all, Shakespeare did write Comedy, yes? This is an excellent video.

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Eugenius Williams Athena the "Spear shaker" is an invention of the Anti-Strats. The Greeks and the Rennaissance English wouldn't have a clue what the hell you're talking about.

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

I dont have a clue where your verbal garbage comes from field Martial Coriolanus. Dont try to spread your lies . Pallas Athena was known by many epiphets throughout history, and always the Spear Shaker was one of them. Check out the staues from greek times where SHE SHAKES THE SPEAR AND WEARS THE HELMET OF INVISIBILTY. Any student of ancient history will tell you this.

I'm finding out-that my great auntie is lady Jane Meautys Cornwallis Bancon, and her brother was my great grandpa, Was the right hand man to Cornwallis But I am trying to find out anything I can about my family. Anyone have anything to share?

Before 1307 the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR - together with the KNIGHTS OF ST. JOHN OF JERUSALEM and in part the TEUTONIC KNIGHTS (these two were originally charitable orders) - were leading organizations behind the crusades against the Muslims. Although these orders were inimical to each other, they fought together for Christianity. It is no coincidence that there is vagueness about the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR and their historical and occult background, for this uncertainty was established purposefully - especially during the past 150 years. The secret about the Templars would not be if it had not been made to be by circles and powers who had and have an understandable interest - from their point of view - to keep the truth in obscurity. Thus it came to pass that the Templars shared a common destiny with their Lord Jesus Christ: As the latter’s teachings had been perverted and reversed when the Old Testament he had vehemently fought against was added to the Christian doctrine, so was the spirit of the Order of the Templars also turned. In both cases the central point of the falsification was the same. In recent times several “neo-pseudo Templar orders” have sprung up. Among these you certainly find people of good intent, but also charlatans and servants of exactly that spirit the old Templars had fought. An amalgamation of the name and spirit of the Templars with components of Freemasonry is utterly grotesque, yet it was done (the Knights Templar degree in the York Rite). Two very pious men stood at the outset of the Order of the Knights Templar: Hugues of Payens and Geoffroy de St. Omer, a Frank and a Norman. They collected a group of friends spirited by a faith typical of the Middle Ages, a faith so powerful that we can hardly imagine it today. Christmas 1117 this small circle decided to form a group for the protection of pilgrims in Jerusalem. It was their only wish to serve the Lord Jesus Christ and the faith. The group, now grown to nine knights, stood rather alone - they had no protection, nor adequate funds. ,

Not really convincing arguments imo

Apollo and Athena= nimrod and simeramis or however its "spelled". Phoenician=canaan

SERPENT SEED The Bible mentions the Kenites as living in or around Canaan as early as the time of Abraham. (Genesis 15:18-21) At the Exodus, Jethro and his clan inhabited the vicinity of Mount Sinai and Horeb. (Exodus 3:1) Moses’ father-in-law, Jethro, was a Kenite (Judges 1:16) resident in the land of Midian. There has been much written recently, concerning the Serpent Seed. There are websites dedicated to the subject. This photo is from a site that teaches on the Kenites, labeling them as carriers of the Serpent Seed. If so, there is a bloodline within Judaism that carries the DNA of fallen angels. The wife of Moses was a Kenite (Judges 1:16) and their sons, Gershom and Eliezer, would have carried the deformity and passed it down to their children. Jethro gave Moses his daughter Zipporah in marriage, despite their religious differences. They married and had two sons, Gershom and Eliezer. A few years later, after God had spoken to Moses through a burning bush, Moses set out with his family to return to Egypt to free his people from slavery. There has been much written recently, concerning the Serpent Seed. There are websites dedicated to the subject. This photo is from a site that teaches on the Kenites, labeling them as carriers of the Serpent Seed. If so, there is a bloodline within Judaism that carries the DNA of fallen angels. The wife of Moses was a Kenite (Judges 1:16) and their sons, Gershom and Eliezer, would have carried the deformity and passed it down to their children. Gershom and Eliezer, would have carried the deformity and passed it down to their children. A word of warning is appropriate here. Many antisemitic extremists today have used these ideas as a platform from which to indict all of Israel. There are good Jews, bad Jews and demonic Jews. None of this affects the Abrahamic Covenant in the slightest and even the existence of a demonic bloodline within Israel, if it is indeed a fact, could not possibly be used to condemn Israel in particular or Jews in general. The author of this article is Pro-God and Pro-Israel. None of this affects the Abrahamic Covenant in the slightest We know that the Nephilim returned after the flood. Genesis 6:4 says, “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days (and also after this) when the sons of God were having sexual relations with the daughters of humankind, who gave birth to their children. They were the mighty heroes of old, the famous men.” Notice the phrase, “and also after this”. We see Nephilim after the flood when the spies go across the Jordan to scout out the Promised Land. Numbers 13:33 tells us, “We even saw the Nephilim there-the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim! To ourselves we seemed like grasshoppers, and we must have seemed the same to them.” Although this photo may have been Photoshopped, multiple photographs of Mr. Rothschild do show an extremely elongated cranium. The suggestion that the original Mayer Amschel Rothschild may have understood the exceptional amount of Nephilim DNA that he held and that the incestuous marriages of his sons created a race apart from the race of Adam is highly likely. Jesus turned down the Devil’s offer of wealth and power. Mr. Rothschild accepted that same offer. It is worth studying the story of the Rothschilds and the Kenite Bloodline. These are the people who run the world for Lucifer. These are the architects of the New World Order… Understanding who they are will give you another insight into world affairs and the end of the age lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/pTh0gkr5dBTAM6uQ_XtPo3jueEwd3058vqqkGP-i1ATN78NOMUDJIC8qGHMMqJELqtXDzt2gQ8n5qIIMJayUINrOyt_9uqU1zBZ-jH1sa4VsK4h3K94kEA=w795-h434-n-rw .

The nonsense here about Shakespeare simply being a pseudonym for mythical gods, is that he was real and historically accounted for, but not as the writer of the plays.

@eugeniuswilliams5457

7 жыл бұрын

Mando Mohan, you have missed the crucial point. Wil Shaksper (as family name was spelt) was a real person who worked as stage hand cum actor in the Shakespearean theatre. But Shakespeare the writer was a pseudonym, used by the great Francis Bacon to write for theatre. It was these fortuitous set of coincidental circumstances that made the whole thing possible. Bacon used this coincidence to further his aim of raising the english language to a much higher state of being!

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

William Shaksper was a real person of the time , and this happy coincidence provided the means of a good comedy of mistaken identity which has entertained for 4 centuries! Rather than being nonsense, Mr.MandoMohan, it is good sense.

@ryanparker4996

Жыл бұрын

​@@eugeniuswilliams5457 its like that Red Dwarf episode where they accidentally travel back in time and bump into "Jesus" but its just some other guy with the same name

***Come one, readers!!!!! this is all historical fact and has NOTHING to do with my translation of meaning. We present as it is presented. Furthermore, however, we are in the LAND where El Shaddai is the biggest break off from the ROMAN Catholic sect and must be noted - in the form of “charismatic leader” Brother Mike Velarde, in the Philippines and now gaining great attention in the United States and other places of note. [You have to now understand that the confrontations are between LEADERS and again, as throughout history, the masses of citizens are totally without knowing and are manipulated by the power brokers.]

The True Mathematical Relationship of Shakespeare's 154 Sonnets to the 14 Tiered Pyramid and 365 Days

I do not believe Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare.😊

what about edward de vere?

@eugeniuswilliams5457

7 жыл бұрын

Edward de Vere was a bit of an egotistical drongo, totally incapable of writing works of such high moral values, amongst all else.

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

de Vere died in 1604 after which many plays were published including The Tempest ten years later. he was also a murderer, drunkard and a rake.

@the17thearlofoxford38

6 жыл бұрын

the Tempest was not published until 1623, seven years after the death of the Stratford boy. so I guess he is out too, right? also, being a murderer, a drunkard, and/or a rake, does not disqualify one from being a writer.

the academics are flogging a dead horse when it comes to the truth of the authorship question. There is overwhelming evidence for the authorship by Ld. Bacon , who was an absolute genius, as his published works , under his own name, prove. That the House in Stratford which the Shakespeare industry flogs to the tourists was built over 100 years after will shakespeares time there, is an historical fact.The records clearly tell how the house from elizabethan times was destroyed by fire, and was rebuilt as the current tourist site in1700's But the fact is this, the shakespeare 'Industry", as developed in the Victorian era, is worth many millions of pounds a year to english coffers!!! So the acadmics see it as their warped patriotic duty to keep coming out with all sorts of nonsense in answer to the perfectly legitimate questions posed by the Baconians. And they will continue to do so, for Queen and country as they believe!

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

The existing building may have burned during Shakespeare's lifetime and might have been rebuilt in the 1590s. The records are inconclusive. The house was completely dismantled and rebuilt in the 1700s at a time when respect for historical artifacts was low. Just look at the Coronation Chair at Westminster Cathedral sometime and you'll see all of the graffiti carved into it by 18th Century divinity students. The "birthplace" is a traditional name, and any modern scholar will tell you that all we know for certain is that Shakespeare's father owned a house built on that site at the time Shakespeare was born. As for "legitimate questions posed by Baconians", what are these, pray tell? Bacon wrote voluminously on many different subjects. No reasonable person who has read both Bacon and Shakespeare would think the two bodies of work were written by the same person. Bacon's book of jests is so unfunny that it's clear Bacon wouldn't know funny if it came up and kicked him in the ass and caused him to fart. As a court official, he would have seen Shakespeare's plays at court. His Promus of Formularies, which includes many proverbs also found in Shakespeare's works, is undated. This would be no evidence either way were it not for the fact that both Shakespeare AND Bacon purloined said proverbs from earlier, mostly classical writers. EVERYONE read Montaigne and Erasmus, but both Shakespeare and Bacon copied those clever lines down. And don't get me started on ciphers, Rosicrucians, Oak Island, and every other cockamamie theory Baconians have dredged up. And by "don't get me started", I mean don't you start.

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

Ill agree with you that some of the ciphers are a bit zany, ie, the american Mrs. Gallup, amongst some others, and I myself have cringed at the negative effects of some of the zealous code seekers. But there are indeed many ciphers of varying type to be found throughout the plays of the Bard. The misnumbered pages are not a clumsy error by an otherwise excellent printer. They appear in many books of the age, always in order to bring attention to something on that page or near. but that Bacon was well versed in ciphers there is no doubt, and he used them throughout his life, in his official court positions and his private life. My dear Martius Coriolanus, you suffer from the same blindness of the schoolmen, in not understanding how Bacon had the amazing, yet not unheard of, literary skill, to write indifferent styles to suit the occasion. His philosophiacal works are in a grand, style reminiscient of the ancients, while he could change style instantly to write for the masses, as the plays of Shakespeare were intended. A perusal of contemporary texts will show 1: Bacons father was fondly remembered for never passing a jest ( and he was one of most prominent pollies of the age), 2; Bacon himself, whilst remembered by his good friends ( not his jealous enemies as politics is bound to throw up} as an Apollo of the Muses, also was of a humorous humour. As Bacon himself wrote, he never professed to being a poet, ie in the true meaning of the word profess, that is he didnt blare it out in public.You make the mistake of thinking that because he was involved in politics he must be like our modern day pollies, boring humourless bores (excuse the bacon pun, unintended). Nothing could be further from the truth! As for your scorn on his character, well" dont get me started!"

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Eugenius Williams By all means, get started. Show anywhere in the works of Francis Bacon that he demonstrated the linguistic flexibility that is the hallmark of Shakespeare. I'm not saying he was stiff because he was a statesman, I'm saying he was stiff because I've read his work. He never demonstrated any flexibility in his writing. It's dry, precise, and straightforward, even in his book of jests. Shakespeare, on the other hand, was bawdy, he stretched his metaphors, he used nouns as verbs and verbs as nouns. He did things with language that Bacon, that great encyclopedia writer, never did and never could. As for the misnumbered pages, they are meaningless. Print shop compositors had about enough type in their cases to do three or four folio pages at a time. Because book leaves were gathered into signatures or quires, typesetters were stuck having to print pages 1 and 16 at the same time, and had to be able to guess what would be on page 16 when pages 2-15 had not yet been set. Getting page numbers wrong happened all the time. It's certainly not a cipher Bacon ever used in his profession, because it would be too obvious. Ciphers are the perfect tool for any conspiracy theorist, because they enable you to see what you want to see, and yet nobody else can see it. Professional cryptography is precise, and reproduceable. Bacon would never have sent a cipher which relied upon the recipient to provide his own context to understand it. Such would be worthless as a form of cryptography. As for his motives for secretly writing Shakespeare's works? They are invented. Nobody can point to a single bit of proof for any of it, which is why Prince Tudor Baconian Ascended Master cipherologists are considered the whackiest of and already out-there lot. Let me know if the Oak Island Truthers come up with any more Shakespeare plays, would you?

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

You need understand that Bacon's position as a lawyer and politician disallowed him from being seen involved in the arts but more than that he himself as a psychological game divided his mental faculties in half, left and right brain, in which one was the stiff statesment following the letter of the law and past (said to be) knowns and the other as the founder of inductive thought in which the imagination of the poets is creatively greater than, and in fact is the leader, of deductive science which would not otherwise happen. Bacon dismissed Aristotle when he was 12 years old and as I am sure you would admit is seen himself as one of the world's great philosophers. To imagine that Bacon could not imagine can only come from the mind of someone that has not the imagination to understand that innate emotions or anything remotely spiritual can have any basis in (alleged) reality. Something that Einstein said did not exist.

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

If you think that you can hide your ignorance by being abusive you are mistakenly transparent as much so as with your total lack of ability to offer any evidence whatsoever for your view that Shakspur, a braggart butcher's boy could write anything but his name. let alone create anything. It would seem you share much in common with him .

FREEMASONRY is one of the oldest organizations still in existence today. Papyrus scrolls that were found in 1888 in excavations in the Libyan desert describe secret meetings of similar groups 2000 B.C. These brotherhoods had already been involved in the building of the Temple of Solomon and fulfilled then their functions similar to today’s unions, yet they already had a mystical tradition. The objective of Masonry is given as the inner transformation through spiritual perfection in reverence of God. Since Freemasons belong to different religions, they call this God the “Great Builder of All Worlds”. Further references are found in the Egyptian Book of the Dead and the God Thoth who had been their Grand Master. “Grand Master” is the usual title for the highest leaders. The spiritual knowledge of the Freemasons had been replaced by symbols, allegories and rituals which served communication. (A secret language with symbols, e.g., the Masonic ritual handshake, the pyramid, the pentagram, the use of the numbers 3, 7, 13 and 33 in coats of arms, emblems and today in company logos and names.) The most important symbol in many organizations, including Freemasonry, is the apron. The apron, which at the outset was simple and unadorned, was replaced by the PRIESTHOOD OF MELCHIZEDEK around 2200 B.C. by a white lambskin and is still used like that today. In ancient Egypt, the Gods, who according to old traditions were flying the “Divine Ships”, were represented in temple paintings with the apron. Later, the priests wore the apron as a sign of devotion to the “flying Gods” and as a sign of authority, representing the Gods over the people. The members of the “BROTHERHOOD OF THE SNAKE” already wore the apron around 3400 B.C. to show their submission to the Gods who came from heaven in “flying wheels”. It is doubtful that the lower grades of the different lodges today know the initial use of the apron. .

I'm folding my tinfoil hat.

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

starbuck26 Tinfoil hats won't protect you from chem trails.

The natives that gave them the most problem were the Cherokee Indians because this tribe retained most of their Atlantean knowledge, even accessing the Bear/Bigfoot frequency for information. For this reason, these people were uprooted from their homeland in the southern Appalachian Mountains, and forcibly marched to Oklahoma on what is now known as The Trail of Tears. Many died along the way. Only a remnant remained in North Carolina, Tennessee, and Georgia. In the north, the vast Iroquois/Mohawk nation was disbanded. The Montauk, direct descendents of the Atlanteans who call their leader Pharaoh, were systematically eliminated. .

When, in the year 1128, the formal founding of the order took place, where Bernard de Clairvaux - later St. Bernard - acted in a sense as patron, the small gathering already had a secret: It was their determination to penetrate the truth of the Christ. Up to then there was only uncertainty - soon one would know for sure. But one has to understand this determination as that of a group of almost naively pious knights who just wanted to serve their Lord Jesus Christ and to rediscover His true teachings. There was nothing aggressive in this, for they were not insinuating any evil wrongdoing. It was Bernard who told them that their ambitions would be frowned upon and that it would be wise not to lay their thoughts open. In the following years, no further indications of the original teaching of Christ were found. The Order of the Templars now took on military tasks. The “secret” soon only lived on in the memories of a few, mainly Provencal brothers. The practical requirements in the Orient left little time or space to care about the secret. The closer contact with Islam was giving new impulses. Some letters attributed to Ali Ibn Abu Thalib (Iman Ali) fell into the hands of a Templar unit during an advance on Damascus. In these, Ali told of a later falsification of the Koran which he likened to the adulteration in the Gospels of Christ. These papers got to the Provence where the old thought resurfaced to search of the truth of the Christ. Now things happened in quick succession: A document was passed on to the Provencal commandery which most probably came from Cathar circles. No wonder then that later the Templars refused to take part in the “crusade” against the Cathars. It was a piece of the original Gospel of John, written by the heretic Marcion in 94 A.D. A letter was enclosed that gave a brief history of Marcion’s life. Here we should state that Marcion succeeded in founding an important, purely Christian movement between 90 and 130 A.D. that only started to decline after he was murdered. Marción, who had actually met the apostle John, taught that Jesus Christ was God incarnate, that there was no “father-God Jahveh”, but that this Hebrew God was Satan himself. He further said that Jesus promised the people “self healing”, so only the goodwill of an individual was required, but no temples and hence no Church organization.

@Random-bj3gf

6 жыл бұрын

The closer contact with Islam was giving new impulses. Some letters attributed to Ali Ibn Abu Thalib (Iman Ali) fell into the hands of a Templar unit during an advance on Damascus. In these, Ali told of a later falsification of the Koran which he likened to the adulteration in the Gospels of Christ. These papers got to the Provence where the old thought resurfaced to search of the truth of the Christ. Have you got any evidence that can substantiate this bizarre claim?

The history of the Templars would be quite different and probably rather unimportant had they no discovered in the ruins of the Temple a rather remarkable find the Knights did not at first know what to do with: These were remains of Hebrew writings, small scraps really, but whose contents would soon become of utmost importance to the Templars and the Order’s history from then on. These scraps were sent to the erudite Etienne Harding who got them translated. And this became the impetus for all that followed. The find proved to be fragments of statements by Jewish eschaimin (spies) who, at the order of the priesthood, reported on the actions of the “cursed mamzer (son of a whore) Jesus” and his “blasphemy against the God of Israel”. And the contents of these reports conflicted absolutely with what was commonly preached! According to them, Jesus called the Hebrew God “JAHVEH” Satan and reproached the Jews for having made the devil himself into their only God. Traces of this can still be found in the Gospel of John in the New Testament, where Jesus tells the Jews “You belong to your father, the devil…” (John 8:44). There had to have been an immense falsification of the teachings of Christ! To understand the profound shock that hit the Templars, one has to think of their strong faith. The God that the Church taught as “Father of Christ” was, in Jesus’ own words, the devil whom to fight he had come to Earth! A study of the Bible soon revealed to the common sense of the simple Templars that the teachings of Jesus and the Old Testament were diametrically opposed and therefore could never belong together. Furthermore, the Jews never called their God “Father” but “JAHVEH” and “EL SHADDAI”. El Shaddai, though, was Sheitan, i.e., the fallen angel! (Sheddeim = depravity, el = archangel. EL is often wrongly translated with God. “God” however is IL in the old oriental tongues).

Thank you Henry Neville (aka William Shakespeare).

Pleiades poets' group was sponsored by Claude de Guise a Merovingian.

also on the folio frontispiece portrait, it has been well noted that the jacket actor Will is wearing , has been so drawn to show back and front of same sleeve, ie two left hands,arms, ie, to issue something left handed implies sub rosa, hidden , or under the table, in modern language. This fact was first noted by a clothes maker, who showed this to the world .Sartor Sarotus! this feature of two left hands, or on similar lines is noted in other works of this period and before with works that were also issued either anonomously, or under a pseudonym. Bacon definitely was not the first , or last, to use this method of publication, as in the western world, it was often necessary to guard ones authorship as a means to preserving ones life. Lord Bacons acknowledged works of philosophy, et al, were all outlawed by catholic" excuse for a church", and were all on list of inquisition banned books. Looking back now the fear of church towards any books of real knowledge is an obvious fact, clear for all to see in its stupidity! Lord Bacons father was banned from court for a 6 month period for being suspected of involvement in a printed work of the time (1560"s) touching on delicate suject of Queens succession and marriage proposals. This was when Francis was a young lad, and would have been a life lesson at the time that he well noted. When he was then in France, still young, he witnessed first hand the secretive underground group known as Pleiades, who were intent on promoting and embellishing the french language, but also had to be careful because of churches opposition to use of common language for their Bible etc. All these events in his youth would be very influential for his decision to write certain works under a carefully concealed alias. The theatre was definitely looked down on as vulgar and beneath the dignity of the ruling classes, into which Bacon was born. So he had to be very careful as he knew his future would involve working for the "common wealth", in its true original meaning.

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Eugenius Williams So why did the engraver make the same error on his other engravings? Were they all secret Bacons, or would the more likely explanation, that he was a mediocre engraver, make more sense?

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

Mr. Coriolanus, I am sick of answering your stupid , so predictable questions. Do some real research for your self for a change,!

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Eugenius Williams How can you be sick of answering my questions when you haven't answered a single one? It's like you're pathologically incapable of responding without attempting to dodge or hide, like some intellectual fight or flight gone haywire. Anyway, I have done my own research, which is how I know that Martin Droeshout made the same "errors" on all of his engravings. He was a mediocre engraver, plain and simple. You, in the other hand, are incapable of that level of research. All you can do is parrot talking points you read somewhere. Well, Polly's full of crackers. I would say that it must suck to lack to intellectual capacity for analytical thought, but I doubt that is the case. The truth is that you're just too lazy to carefully read my arguments and think up a fitting response. It's a shame that poor old dead Bacon has such mental layabouts for followers.

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

So there we have it from the self proclaimed "god" of all things shakespearian; the engraver Droushet was an incompetent, and he just happened to make the same error on many of his works?Nobody would have pointed out to poor mr droushet his errors so he didnt perform them again and again,!!! Here we have the type of thinking needed to be a believer in the stratfordian shakespeare, the floggers of dead horses.

1844 AD SECOND GREAT AWAKENING - YOM KIPPUR, MORMONS, AND ADVENTISTS - The Karaite Jews confirmed that the “Day of Atonement” was late October, not late September, against Jewish tradition. This was called the second Great Awakening in New England states, of America, as Karaite Judaism became a Jewish religious movement characterized by the recognition of the Tanakh, or five books of Moses, alone as its supreme authority. Karaites fundamentalists rejected the rabbi written documents with their additional explanations, as NOT binding on them. Karaites strove to adhere to the plain or most obvious meaning of the text of the five books, the meaning that would have been naturally understood by the ancient Israelites when the books were given. They rejected the rabbi written laws in the Talmud containing tremendous evil against humanity. Karaite Judaism holds every interpretation of the Tanakh five basic books must address the fundamental meaning and it is the personal responsibility of every individual Jew to do so. Karaites consider arguments made in the Talmud and other works, but never exalting them above the basic five books. This Jewish awakening was unique in that it moved beyond the educated elite of New England to those who were less wealthy and less educated. The center of revivalism was the so-called Burned-over district in western New York. Named for its overabundance of hellfire-and-damnation preaching, the region produced dozens of new denominations, communal societies, and reforms. These Jews Awakening also pushed temperance (PROHIBITION DISASTER), abolition, and women’s rights. In addition to these causes, reforms touched nearly every aspect of daily life, such as restricting the use of tobacco and acceptable diet and dress reforms. .

BUT WHY WOULD BACON DO ANY OF THIS?

@Genesisone29

9 жыл бұрын

www.sirbacon.org/links/thesecretbard.html

@ruthamyallan1

8 жыл бұрын

He was part of The Great Work that is bringing a certain Biblical figure to power at this time. Which one? Well, the clue is, that Jesus of Nazereth said "In secret I have said nothing." This business, on the other hand, is all about secrets, the hidden, or occult things. It is striking that in an age of revived Christian Faith, the author of Shakespeare's plays, is conspicuous in absenting Christ

@Genesisone29

8 жыл бұрын

+Ruth Allan Very Good Point Allen!

@peluchetaiwanes

8 жыл бұрын

+Ruth Allan I´m at a loss here. the renaissance masonic / rosicrucian project for mankind is still alive? the absence of king arthur and christ from shakespeare´s plays is a message?

@ruthamyallan1

8 жыл бұрын

Couldn't speak on Arthur's absence, though both absences could be explained (superficially) on the grounds that the Renaissance folks were drunk on the wine of the Greek and Roman classics and Arthur was a bit too much of a medieval favourite, over pushed by the Tudors for their own dynastic reasons.....and the Rosicrucian project is reaching its zenith in our own times.

is John Wycliffe a pseudonym? Run for the hills!!!

------------------------------------------------------------- ____ Hamlet Q1 (1603) . Hamlet: An excellent fellow by the Lord Horatio, . This *SEAUEN YEARES* haue I noted it: the toe of the pesant, . *COMES so neere the heele of the courtier* , . That hee gawles his kibe, I prethee tell mee one thing, . How long will a man lie in the ground before hee rots? . Clowne: I faith {SIR}, if hee be not rotten [B]efore . He be laide in, [A]s we haue many pocky [C]orses, . He will last y[O]u, eight yeares, *A TAN[N]ER* . Will last you eight yeares full out, or nine. . Hamlet: And why *A TANNER* ? . Clowne: Why his hide is so tanned with his trade, . That it will holde out water, that's a parlous . Deuourer of your dead body, a great soaker. ................................................... . . . I f a i t h {S I R} i f h e e b e n . o t r o t t e n [B] e f o r e H e b . e l a i d e i n [A] s w e h a u e m . a n y p o c k y [C] o r s e s H e w . i l l l a s t y [O] u e i g h t y e . a r e s a t a n [N] e r . [{SIR}BACON] 17 : Bacon was knighted in 1603 (the year of Q1) ---------------------------------------------------------

Shakespeare's real name was Francis Garland. Research Vincent Bridges Prague (RIP 2014)

SHAKESPEARE DID NOT EXIST' FRANCIS BACON WROTE ALL THE BOOK OF SHAKESPEARE'

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

Shaksper , the man who worked in theatre at time, did exist, but Shakespeare the author was another thing entirely. Yes Flor anderson, you are correct. Shakespeare did not exist, as a person, but was a name given to the authorship of writings ofFrancis Bacon and his brother, Anthony, those Incomparable Brethren of the title page. See Daphne DU Maurier's last two works before death.

@garymeats9323

6 жыл бұрын

Flor anderson if this true. Mr great grandfather wrote everything for sir Frances bacon, from the king and Buckingham, bacon, but my grandfather went to law school took over bacon place at the law school

Human Rights and Freemasonry One have to do with the richness of gold and of carnal temples, God do not live in temples built by hands (Acts 17:24Open in Logos Bible Software (if available), Acts 7:48Open in Logos Bible Software, the other have to do with the richness of the spirit. n top of all freemasonry lodges in the World is the pure Jewish lodge B‘nai Brith, Sons of the Pact. All Masonic brethren throughout the world participate in the rebuilding of Solomon’s temple, which symbolizes the Jewish secular world domination, - Jewish Messianic Thought: The Jews are the «chosen people» who will rule the world, and a man of Jewish ancestry to become ruler of the world. ‘ We will re-build’ (Isaiah 9:10Open in Logos Bible Software (if available)), they state (Malachi 1:4Open in Logos Bible Software (if available)), what Jesus torned down defeating Satan (Matthew 24:2Open in Logos Bible Software (if available)), even though the Builders have and will not use the correct cornerstone (Genesis 49:24Open in Logos Bible Software (if available), Psalm 118:22Open in Logos Bible Software (if available), Mark 12:10Open in Logos Bible Software (if available), Acts 4:11Open in Logos Bible Software (if available), 1 Peter 2:7Open in Logos Bible Software (if available),); they still regards themselves competent Builders (?). “Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history, grades, official appointments, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end” - Rabbi Isaac Wise (of B’nai B’rith, quoted in Israelite of America, Aug 3, 1866) «Freemasonry is based on Judaism. What is left of the Freemasonic rituals, when eliminating Judaism doctrines? « «The Jewish Tribune». New York, 29. okt. 1925. «It must be the Masonry first commandment to glorify the Jewish race that has kept in secrecy the divine content unchanged.» [Cabala/Talmud] Freemason magazine «Le Symbolisme», Freemasonry and Judaism: Secret Powers Behind Revolution «The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal: Christ, Buddha or Mohammed, the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the bearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque or cathedral, realizing with his truer understanding the oneness of all spiritual truth.» - The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, Manly Palmer Hall, «The Unitarian/Masonic Christ is very similar to the New Age Christ, a guru-type figure possessing a more elevated or spiritual state of consciousness than the average man.», as per Madam Blavatski’s teachings. Symbols of Freemasonry All the way to the right THE SYMBOLIC SNAKE (The Serpent). The head symbolizes the initiates. The body representing the Jewish people. It is predicted that the predetermined path ends with its head return to Zion, then Judaism by putting Europe in chains have brought the earth under his dominion. And the cube to the left, what is that? The Cube. To the left the Muslims holy Kaba. To the right a Jewish Rabbi «Grand Orient lodge belong as mentioned the humanitarian Freemasonry, who openly work for communism and sought affiliation to the Soviet Union, and it is therefore natural that the political kingpins at the same time was Freemasons, as mr. Anthony Eden, repeatedly have been in Moscow for political instructions, most recently in December 1941, where an agreement was made to surrender Europe to Stalin’s rule and thus to Bolshevism and the red terror, if England won the war». After the Vatican was brought to it’s knees financially around 1900-1920, it was hijacked by the Synagogue of Satan. Until this day Baron Rothschild is the Vaticans bankers, i.e. for all practical purposes the Owner of RCC. Earlier it was also setup to subtly corrupt Christianity, ref. to the Jewish founder of the Jesuits, but it was not so openly. Temple Destruction Foretold' «And while some were talking about the temple, that it was adorned with beautiful stones and votive gifts, He said, 6″As for these things which you are looking at, the days will come in which there will not be left one stone upon another which will not be torn down.» - Luke 21:5-6Open in Logos Bible Software Evidence of fakery In Isa. 43-44Open in Logos Bible Software (if available), Israel is declared to be God’s witness and servant who is to bring the knowledge of God to the nations. In chapter 42 of the same book Israel is declared to be a ‘covenant of the people, a light to the nations, to open the blind eyes, to bring out the prisoners from the prisons, and them that sit in darkness out of the prison house’ (Isa. 42:6-7Open in Logos Bible Software Have the Jews done this? No. Jews do not missionary, or spread any other gospel than materialism at all. When they hijacked the Israel status from the Lost Tribes of Israel (white people), the ‘Light of Nations’ became the Chosen Ones by their egregore god to full freedom of looting of all nations. Massdeportations from ME The emotional programming of the masses in mainstream media to receive those the edomite Israel do not want in their neighborhood: The neighboring countries populations must be moved to Europe and USA so the Jews can have the Eretz Israel, own the land from Euphrates to Nile (that is the two blue lines in Israels flag). Very soon they have accomplished their goals, about what Jesus said «there is not to be stone upon stone of this place» (Luke 21:6Open in Logos Bible Software (if available)), but occultists from the school of Salomon and satanists (Synagogue of Satan, Rev. 2.9Open in Logos Bible Software (if available) & 3.9Open in Logos Bible Software (if available)) have their own plans… «We will rebuild«, they say in Isaiah 9:10Open in Logos Bible Software (if available), Malachi 1:4Open in Logos Bible Software (if available). «I will tear down«, says the Lord, the God of Abraham, Moses, Jacob-Israel, David and Jesus (Malachi 1:4Open in Logos Bible Software .

The Freemasons were heirs of the more militant Templars but reinitiated the old Masons ideals of the Egyptian Pharaohs in a covert manner including various branches such as the Rosicrucans which John Dee, Francis Bacon and Valentin Andrea created mainly for German consumption. The Egyptian masons were Hermeticists from which the original Jewish religion came but went awry until John the Baptist and his pupil Jesus came along to put it back on the tracks. Jesus preached a Jewish Christianity which went underground but was adopted by the Templars until its virtual erasure by the Catholic church, but was reignited with Calvin ( a Jew) and Luther. Freemasonry became a cult combining science and spiritialism as did Bacon in his views and was open to anyine who might subscribe to them.

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

Yes and the secrets of egypt were something that the tyrannical western church were especially scared of, as it put the lie to their childrens story version of the bible, and exposed christianitys real roots in a way which went against all the falsities and distortions of truth that they themselves introduced into the biblical text. they couldnt have people knowing that Moses was really a Pharoah, amongst other things of an equally concerning nature.

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

No more than they wanted to acknowledge Mary Magadalene as a great granddaughter of Cleopatra. It was not until the Nicene creed was in place that she was portrayed as a prostitute as her true "Jewish Christian" religion of John the Baptist, the Hermetics, and Jesus her lover, was outlawed.

@eugeniuswilliams5457

6 жыл бұрын

Hey JayBee , did you notice that field Martial Coriolanus didnt jump in to correct us simple mortals with his infallible decrees of dogma, and his ever repeating "wheres the evidence". Is he not so annoying?

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

Perhaps he died of apoplexy.

As can be seen below Caius Coriolanus has been attacking me in these columns with abusive language trying to spoil the views I have expressed in my recent novel The Royal Secret which are in opposition to his own. He has delved into my career which he claims is bogus in order to discredit my reputation and my book. In his statements I which I challenged his authority on the question of the Shakespeare authorship he has admitted to being a English police officer, and not the academic he was trying to pass himself off as. I apologise to other contributors for the discloure of matters which are no part of this forum. For those who do wish to check out my credentials and my book they can be found on info@theroyalsecret.info

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Jay Bee I am not an English police officer, I am a police officer in the United States, and I have never claimed to be an academic. I was awarded a Master of Science degree in Computer Science many years ago, and worked only a few years in that field. I lay claim only to specific academic interests, and my expertise in the areas of Early Modern English Literature is entirely autodidactic. Aside from your absurd premise, my criticisms of you are two-fold. I question the veracity of your biography because someone of such august financial accomplishments would not need to resort to publishing his work through a print-on-demand format and writing his own reviews of it on Amazon, and giving copies away to pump his reviews on Goodreads.com. Someone as estranged as you from the concept of "evidence", would have no qualms about adopting the biography of a similarly-named person of greater accomplishment. I also am critical of your compete unwillingness to provide any evidence for your freely espoused beliefs. You're happy to tell us your whacky opinions about Francis Bacon, but entirely unwilling to tell us why you believe them, aside from assertions that you possess superior "imagination".

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

Obviously you have nothing better to do but criticise others when you have no qualifications of note yourself. Mine can be seen on johnbentley.biz if you only bother to click on the many articles in reputable journals accompanying it. I make no bones that I am first time writer, so what? My studies on the subject of Bacon for two years are no less than yours so what gives you the pre-eminence you like to claim. Either put up or shut up. I have written a novel to attract a wider public to understand the genius of Bacon. Something that requires imagination to make a good story, rather than some sort of dry police or academic report requiring evidence for every word, as in the presumably unimaginative world you live in. You are intent for no good reason to spite my work. Others who have written the many reviews on Goodreads are a better judge of it. That I may have given free offers of the book to some 30 people in order to initially promote it is perfectly normal even with fully established authors, and shows you know little about bookpublishing, since all authors now appear on Amazon and Goodreads which is owned by Amazon. Oddly enough the giveaways are perhaps the best judgement of a book from an overall viewpoint since they cover a good cross section of people, not just ones out to claim some sort of fame for themselves by sarcasm as you do. Good riddance pal. Go and shoot someone. Maybe you'll feel happier.

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Jay Bee I have shot plenty of holes in your bizarro hypothesis. That's good enough for me. Just admit you wrote a book of fiction, and that you have no evidence, and we can be done.

@jaybee4653

6 жыл бұрын

I don't expect you are aware of French literary scholars and philosophers but one of the best-known, Montaigne, is famously known for his quote that "all that is certain is that nothing is certain." It was an utterance pretty much the same as Lucretius a thousand years before-hand, and echoed by Karl Popper more recently. Perhaps you would like to argue with them. Art, poetry and literature. i.e, imagination is always the precursor of deductive science. If you read my book The Royal Secret you might open your mind to a form of thinking you so resolutely oppose. I expect it would both astound and alarm you that Francis Crick, the discoverer of DNA, admitted that he had been on a strong LSD trip when he came up with his original thought which led to his following scientific unearthing of DNA, the single most important scientific discovery of all time. You will find this in my book and much more about how Bacon (alias Shakespeare) is the genius who links the past to the present, and incidentally as the Founder of modern Freemasonry, was very largely the main contributor to the US Constitution and the Freemasonry principles on which America was founded by its Masonic leaders.

@Jeffhowardmeade

6 жыл бұрын

Jay Bee Because Shakespeare read Montaigne, I read Montaigne. I am aware that absolute certainty is impossible. I am also aware that the impossibility of absolute certainty does not give us license to simply believe any damn fool thing we wish. I have also read The Doors of Perception as well as a large body of modern scientific research on the effects of psychotropic drugs. It would not surprise me that any particular idea was conceived under the influence of drugs or alcohol. What surprises me is that you think all it takes to prove a fact is to drop acid. There is no EVIDENCE that Crick used LSD before the 1960s. That he was tripping when he conceived of the structure of DNA is a rumor printed after his death by the Daily Frigging Mail. Even if it were true, Crick and Watson started with decades of research done by others and then performed years of their own research before solving the problem. They sought EVIDENCE, and they found it. The Double Helix is a ripping good read, by the way. Yeah, I read everything. Thank you for your tacit admission that your book is the result of fantasies you had while tripping. It makes perfect sense, and explains why you make wild claims you can't support. It jibes with everything I have learned in nearly 30 years of working with people under the influence of drugs.