Fascinating, Bryan. Thankyou for posting this and keep up the good work!

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks, will do!

Absolutely fascinating! Truly appreciate how you’ve brought history to life, and the level of detail you provide. Not sure if there’s any other source as detailed as this. Thank you for all you do to preserve the history of such important - and beautiful - aircraft.

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Wow, thank you so much for your kind words

The level of detail you provide is quite amazing. I really like how you combine the drawings, photographs, and schematics to provide an excellent orientation. Cheers from us colonials across the pond!

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much 😀

@PanzerDave

2 жыл бұрын

@@ukaircraftexplored6556 You are very welcome!

Perfect!!!!many thanks and greetings from germany

@ukaircraftexplored6556

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

All this design detail was done by draughtsman manually without the benefits of computers. The design coordination was incredible improved as flight hours increase. Fascinating

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

I totally agree, and one reason I love recreating wartime diagrams in colour - as a salute to their hard and detailed work. Thanks so much for watching

Preserving history in exquisite and unique detail. The wonderful visuals are accompanied by the well-researched narration. What a pleasure to see this historic aircraft brought into focus again in both human and engineering terms. Must have been lots of work. Thanks so much.

@ukaircraftexplored6556

Жыл бұрын

Thanks, Paul, your words are very much appreciated. Yes, each video takes a great deal of work, but it's well worth the effort I put in to help to promote UK Aviation History and provide my video studies for my much-appreciated viewers, such as yourself. Thanks for watching!

I really enjoy these and your research is amazing. I was surprised you didn't comment on the displaced mid upper turret fitted to some marks. Compare the Canadian Mk X to the BoB PA474

Hello! This is stellar work, I wanted to sincerely thank you for taking the time to go through these aircraft in this detailed yet concise fashion. I also have a request: would you have access to documents about the Lancaster's Cg location and moment calculations with different load-outs and options, if applicable. This would help immensely on a project.

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Sorry, for my late reply. Yes, I have 4 Loading and CG Diagrams. Please sent me an e-mail and I'll scan them for you.

Another super insight into this aircraft

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

@stanner7500

2 жыл бұрын

@@ukaircraftexplored6556 You must spend much time working to perfect those wonderful drawings of detail. Enjoyed all your videos. Thank you for producing them for us to watch

Thank you and really interesting content

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it

3:45 - Curious why you didn't go further into detail about that parachute door on the floor of the nose section - this was supposedly just a tad too small for a heavily outfitted bomber crew member wearing a parachute to get out easily from this forward part of the Lancaster. As a result, the Lancaster had one of the worst crew bail out survival rates of any Allied bomber during the war - only 15% of crew who bailed out of a Lancaster bomber survived. The design of the central bomb compartment, where the bomb bay is closed off with a floor to the cabin also made it impossible for the crew to bail out from the bomb bay compartment, unlike US bombers like the B-17 and B-24, where the bomb compartment is open to the rest of the fuselage interior. Crew could always jump out of an open bomb bay in US bombers. For the rear crew, the main entrance door was right in front of the rear tail section, so trying to bail out from that side door would require not get swept into and smashed against the rear tail secion.

@ukaircraftexplored6556

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching. The Nose Parachute exit is covered in my video 'Emergency Procedures'.

Nice one Bryan

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Dave 👍

great video, I am always amazed that the flight engineers seat does not have a backrest,must have been very uncomfortable ,considering the duration of the flights

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!

Its interesting that despite being a metal aircraft, it’s construction still had a lot of wood. For example the canopy frame and the rear gun turret doors

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, wood certainly played its part

Anything that consists of five sections and can be disassembled for transport because it is bolted together is not of "monocoque construction". It is òf the exact opposite. Component construction.

Did only pathfinders use the Hs2 radar? I think that is the system with the dome on the underside of the fuselage? I saw PO S, S for sugar in RAF Hendon the other day, and it had that dome on her underside, I think it’s the Hs2, but I’m not sure if it was only pathfinders that used it Nice video by the way, keep up the good work 👍

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

H2S was the first airborne, ground scanning radar system, developed for Bomber Command and could be fitted to most UK bomber aircraft and used to identify targets on the ground for night bombing. It was not just fitted to Pathfinder aircraft. I shall be creating a video covering the development of H2S radar later on.

@jamesharrison9336

2 жыл бұрын

@@ukaircraftexplored6556 ah right, I read it could be detected by night fighters, Where as Oboe and The previous system (I cant remember its name) Elsie or something like that, I don’t think could be, at least I think, it didn’t say they could in the book

Hi there was there a white avro lancaster bomber. As I fly RC planes and im looking at building a large lancaster and want to do something different from the normal camo. If you could help with any details

Why is it painted that shade of green? Surely it would have been cheaper just to leave the interior as bare metal ?

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

It was standard Air Ministry practice to paint RAF aircraft with a grey green paint. The colour was used as it was thought to reduce glare and eye strain. Thanks for watching.

@dennisyoung4631

2 жыл бұрын

Corrosion prevention??

How big was the camera window? I never knew it existed, I want to add it on a model Lancaster, I need to know the size though, it’s not a problem if not available though

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

The Lancaster was fitted with the F.24 Camera as standard for target photography. I will be creating a video covering the F.24 camera later on. As to the diameter of the lens window, it could be around 14" plus. But I'm not sure on this. I hope this helps and thanks for watching.

@jamesharrison9336

2 жыл бұрын

@@ukaircraftexplored6556 thank you 👍 take care

But where is the loo?

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

Just forward of the Tail Plane Spar. View my video covering Ground Crew Tasks to see how the Elsan Toilet was serviced.

I have never seen another picture of the 'armoured bulkhead with doors' at frame 7. Can you confirm this was a standard fitment on wartime aircraft?

@ukaircraftexplored6556

2 жыл бұрын

It was a fitment on some Lancasters and is described in the AP manuals of the period. I personally photographed the door in the Lancaster B Mk.X at Duxford. I haven't seen it fitted in any other UK based examples. Thanks for watching.