A great example of a Card too complex for it's own good is Pot of Greed, had to be banned because none knows what it does😢

@Skeeeewoah

4 ай бұрын

"I PLAY POT OF GREED AND DRAW 3 CARDS! WHICH ALLOWS ME TO PLAY POT OF GREED AND I DRAW 3 CARDS"

Simplicity is soooo important. My friend tried to teach me ygo about 5-6 years ago. I could not get a single thing, the amount of text overwhelmed me. However, about 2 years ago my friend taught me how to play mtg, specifically commander, and I got it because it wasn't too much and eventually I got what most of the keywords did. I was also a lot younger which could contribute to me having a hard time learning ygo but one of the things mtg does right is not having most cards be massive amounts of text and/or it being simple to understand at a glance. These are just my thoughts though.

Another thing that might be important is that as a card game player my rule of thumb is usually that between cards that are trying to achinve the same goal the one with less rules text tends to be the more powerful one. For example black and jeweled lotus both exist to give you a boost in mana temporarily, they cost the same and both have a tap effect that sacrifices them and both of thos effects add the same amount of mana, jeweled lotus however adds a bit of text specifiying that you can only use the mana it generates to cast your commander and not to pay any other cost. Yes if you had 2 creatures that each cost 2 mana and one is a 2/2 that has no abilities while the other is a 2/2 with flying then the flyer would be more powerful, so ofc there are exceptions like that but in general more text means more restrictions or additional costs to get the same benefit. And it makes sense from a design standpoint as well, if you make a card to be better in a niece than another and not make it worse outside of that niece then you just made a strictly better card which a niece card should not be. So for every niece interaction and effect you should have a "basic" version that will be the best version of the effect in a vacuum that the more situational cards are balanced around.

Me: This monster can attack during your own battle phase if you choose to. If you attack with this monster during you battle phase, you may choose an appropriate taeget for it's attack, if you do perform a battle attack (Compare the targeted card's vitality with this card's atrack power, if the opposing card has less vitality than this card has attack, destroy the target. If this card has less attack than the target has vitality, take damage equal to the difference between this card's attack and the target's vitality), you may only perform battle once per Battle Phase with this card. If this card is destroyed as a result of battle, send this card to the graveyard if appropriate, make sure you check if there are other card effects that would prevent this or send this card elsewhere. If this card is jn your hand during your Main Phase 1 Main Phase 2, If you have not normal summoned or set a card this turn you may summon it to you side of the field, this is treated as a normal summon. You ma

@snarkychan7504

3 ай бұрын

ur so good at card design

The funniest thing about this article to me as a Magic player is that, in a vaccuum, Shummit Shmowler is absolutely a better card than Summit Prowler. They trade if smacked into each other at base, meaning Shmowler has the slight mana advantage in that exchange. Shmowler comes out a turn earlier, so it can threaten life totals sooner. And to top it all off, Shmowler's effect isn't a once-per-turn, meaning it can easily become a 6/5 or higher for 3 mana in the right deck, probably a Rakdos deck. The ONLY reason Shmowler can be considered worse here is that Prowler was specifically designed for Tarkir limited, while Shmowler is designed to be more broadly applicable. Shmowler is a lot worse for the Temur decks at the time because they wouldn't really be planning on sacrificing creatures often, especially not outside of combat. The author's mistake in trying to make Shmowler a weaker card was in reducing its mana cost. If Shmowler was a 3/2 for 4 with conditional upside, I would still say it has a higher ceiling, but I wouldn't consider it a better card because it's so far below rate. As it stands, though, it feels like he's trying to gaslight me into believing that the card that is nearly always stronger is actually a worse option.

Definitely needed that tip about spreading effects out amongst different cards for combos. I deeply appreciate your work!

Yeah, this is a good article. I like this guy!

Yes! The fitness of a ruleset can be described as "elegance": functionality per complexity. I would assert that this is true for most any category of ruleset, not just card design. For example, Hangul is such a simple yet complete phonetic writing system that it can be learned in a few hours, unlike Chinese which takes many years. This contributes to greater efficiency in achieving high literacy rates.

@ShardTCG

4 ай бұрын

Exactly! We don't play a game for the rules. We play for the emotional connections we make, strategy, and competition. This sounds like it is heavily tied into the rules, but the rules will just set a few hard boundaries to which the game exists inside of.

YGO: I feel called out

Oh man, thank you. I've broken so many phones on the like button.

@ShardTCG

2 ай бұрын

It's an unnecessary risk. Be careful, friend.

While the term complex fits well for its own reasons, i like specific here a little more. The more specific something is, the more limiting it is. Good video as always friend 🙏

I just finished simple but affective rules theyre simple and the cards are the ones that are the strategy, Also just finished the video! Lastly if a card has what some consider overpowered itll be a combo move its one move doing. Mulitiple things at once or back to back priced a little high to use because of its intensity and the assist cards are cheap and strategy effective

I kamehameha'd the like button by accident.

@ShardTCG

4 ай бұрын

OMG! I hope your device or PC is okay 👍

@DoodleStein

4 ай бұрын

@@ShardTCG to my surprise, it actually fully charged my phone 👍🏻

😁

Very important, use Keywords.

@Skeeeewoah

4 ай бұрын

Absolutely and they need to be as common sense as possible too.

@Flamewolf14

4 ай бұрын

If its a digital ccg having easy refrence like tool tips explaining them

Card complexity can hurt the longevity of a game as well. The more complex your effects, the more difficult you make the barrier to entry for new players over time. I know Yu-Gi-Oh gets dogpiled on for their walls of text, but teaching that game to someone now vs ten years ago, twenty years ago. It's too much information to expect a new player to maintain and absolutely prevents some people from ever picking it up.

@allovertheworld5048

4 ай бұрын

It's funny to me that people say that any yugioh cards have a super complex wall of text as if all the cards had the complexity of linear equation canon or equation system cannon and the same amount of text as gladiator beast's assault fort or the version of the anime of the winged dragon of ra when in reality they are quite easy to understand

@JamesJP

4 ай бұрын

I used to play yugioh years ago. Even if I was a returning player, I find the game too fast and complex.

@dudono1744

2 ай бұрын

​@@allovertheworld5048The equation cannon cards are pretty easy to understand, just hard to use. It's not like Inspector Boarder where understanding what it does is challenging on its own.

This is my problem with yugioh these days

Simplicity is good, but also vanilla isn't necessarily better because simple, the biggest issue are conditionals. Conditionals add more information tracking and weaken the card (and fun).

@dudono1744

2 ай бұрын

Conditionals can be fun, for example for alt win cons

I actually have more fun making games than playing them.

@ShardTCG

2 ай бұрын

That's awesome! And Dreadgate is such a great name for a game

@DreadgateTCG

2 ай бұрын

@ShardTCG thank you, my friend! I agree. Game used to be called Gateway but I realized it needed something spicier.

This is exactly why I am not a fan of YuGiOh, one card is like four cards from Hearthstone lol.

@Skeeeewoah

4 ай бұрын

Yu-Gi-Oh really is a good game, but it's ran by a company that has milked it for all they could.

@ShardTCG

4 ай бұрын

😂

@supremacyecg6815

4 ай бұрын

@@Skeeeewoah I'm not saying this game is bad. Because it gives inspiration over thinking up new mechanics. But I am incredibly turned off by the wall of text, which is why I play only single player. In multi there are a million effects on the board, and I have no idea what is going on, from where what and how, I already prefer Duel Masters Plays. Because there, despite many effects on the card there are used keywords.

@allovertheworld5048

4 ай бұрын

The stupid meme of yugioh cards have a complex wall of text aside, yugioh cards are pretty easy to understand and the reason the card text is supposedly long is because most of the yugioh card text are activation/summon conditions, restrictions and occasionally an alternative activation/summon conditions to prevent them from being abused in degenerated ftks and in case you are wondering why Yugioh does not use keywords, it is because in Yugioh there is a huge, huge number of similar effects and unique effects and even some that change the way the game is played, so if they put keywords in Yugioh the The result would be thousands of keywords and I think that would be more intimidating than the supposed wall text

@Skeeeewoah

4 ай бұрын

@@allovertheworld5048 to be fair, Yu-Gi-Oh cards do have a lot of text, but it *could* be a lot easier to read if they formated and worded the text better.

PLEASE put a link to any article you are reading in the video description

@ShardTCG

4 ай бұрын

The link is there. Caps aren't appreciated, thank you.

If you're lame