VOTING NO 👎 All Australian's should be equal, don't divide us by race

Say no to protected classes. Say no to segregation. Say no to institutional racism.

@DownUnderDigitals

Жыл бұрын

Say no to paying a weekly amount of money to people for something i never done.

Voting NO.

I'm voting NO.

The writings on the wall. It reads NO! And rightly so! 🇦🇺💯%

A nice duck n weave by Senator Gucci-McCarthy. Like Sen Jacinta Price, I will be voting No

Oh ok lets all be good vegemites and follow the Leader and when we get there he will tell us what it is all about..

The constitution should not be a plaything. Generally referenda have failed if they try to give more power to a group particularly politicians.

Does no one remember the disaster that was ATSIC? So corrupt and ineffective both major parties voted to disband it. I can't see the voice being any better.

@pronumeral1446

Жыл бұрын

John Howard was always against listening to Indigenous people. He literally passed the NT Intervention laws, taking away their houses without consulting them. He took any excuse to get rid of ATSIC. Instead, ATSIC should've been reformed instead of abolished. If the Voice is passed, it will be able to be reformed by Parliament - but can only be abolished with the consent of Australians. And Parliament will have to listen to the opinions of Aboriginal people before passing laws to affect them. Seems reasonable to me.

Bloody ridiculous

NEIN

Wow, the project allows comments on this? Not like them at all! How about Brittany Higgins, Lidia Thorpe, Kathleen Folbigg.......?

"The most disadvantaged" Have a good think about those words. They are the most funded group per capita WORLD WIDE and it aint even close

@Roy-ds7gk

Жыл бұрын

💯

@benjaminfalzon4622

11 ай бұрын

The indigenous smoking ceremonies mean only one thing for the rest of us, it means, our rights and our way of life are going up in smoke.

I'll be voting "NO". Get a job if you want money each week.

@Level-up-your-life

Жыл бұрын

I think we should give aboriginals less , not more

@DownUnderDigitals

Жыл бұрын

@@Level-up-your-life I'm all for equal rights, but, not at the expense of 'punishing' white folks who had nothing to do with anything they carry on about.

The real born in that country are called in 1500's Terra Australia not Australian. COMMON WEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is a corporation who own islands like Christmas island and Norfolk Island.

Labors Voice is all about its desire for greater state power. Many in favour of the Voice fail to understand the purpose of a nation’s Constitution. The ‘yes’ Campaign is built on the premise that a nation’s Constitution is the equivalent of an ‘About Us’ page on a corporate website. The purpose of a Constitution is to strictly set out the limits of government power in a free society. The ALP played no role in drafting of the Australian Constitution. In 1897 the people of the colonies elected delegates to a Constitutional convention - the ALP’s only contribution was to snipe on the sidelines and not run candidates. Within the DNA of the ALP is an unsettled relationship with our Constitution because it limits power of the state too much for their liking. Labor has craved amending our Constitution ever since. In 1910 Labour PM Andrew Fisher, ardent Socialist, put up a record 11 referendums. All 11 failed and Australia dodged socialist poison. Since Fisher there have been 33 more referendums, 19 from the ALP with only 1 of them approved, and 14 from non-Labor with 8 of those approved. Whitlam and Hawke each tried 6 times to change our Constitution, all failing and scoring 12 fails. Labor PMs since, avoided Constitutional change, opting for endlessly expanding state control through bureaucracy. Life-long residents of the political bubble believe the only thing that can lift Aboriginal living standards is politicians and bureaucrats; Rudd’s apology and the endlessly bloated Aboriginal bureaucracy do almost nothing, and cause division. As Ronald Reagan wisely noted, ‘Government is not the solution to our problems - government is the problem.’ Voting for the Voice is like finding oneself in a hole and digging deeper. To survive on this hostile continent for 65,000 years Aboriginals must have been possessed of a powerful can-do spirit. Reducing government bureaucracy will help them rediscover that essential ingredient.

Why divide any country's population. "One Australian" for all the 4,300 versions of religions, for all the millions of immigrants to Australia, and for all the various mobs of Aboriginal Australians. When there are problems there are solutions to fix them. Governments?

no no no ......

Not quite blindly trust him, it’s a representative democracy, so we voted because we trust him.

😂

I'm voting. Yes for my home ✊🏾✊🏾

@peterpopovich4498

Жыл бұрын

So you buy a house without knowing how its build...nice

The only connection Pauline has with the land is a fish and chip shop 😂

I’m Voting YES

Terra is from another Latin word meaning “earth” or “land” as well as the Latin name for the planet. Nullius means territory which belongs to no state In international law, terra nullius is territory which belongs to no state. Sovereignty over territory which is terra nullius can be acquired by any state by occupation.[4] According to Oppenheim: "The only territory which can be the object of occupation is that which does not already belong to another state, whether it is uninhabited, or inhabited by persons whose community is not considered to be a state; for individuals may live on as territory without forming themselves into a state proper exercising sovereignty over such territory."[5 There was widespread acceptance of the concept that a state could acquire territory through occupation of land that was not already under sovereignty and was uninhabited or inhabited by peoples who had not developed permanent settlements, agriculture, property rights or political organisation recognised by European states. To occupy is not to own. Some 700 disparate, warring tribes with as many languages who often as not were unable to discourse is not a “nation”. The impassioned deceit of Tanya Pliebersek on ABC radio is to assert the party line that the land was stolen from the aboriginal nation. No such entity existed. It is pure fantasy. Such a barren belief by socialists only value is to stir resentment & rally their troops to a false state of hysterical uproar at an injustice that, demonstrably, doesn`t exist.

@aggressivecalm

Жыл бұрын

Indeed two, to three decades of Australia the stolen land being pushed out by the ABC and now the mainstream media, with as you say the party line that the land was stolen from the aboriginal nation. No such entity existed. It is pure fantasy, and essentially a deceitful invention. Such a barren belief by socialists whose only value is to stir resentment & rally their naive brain washed troops to garner their masters power, money, and political capital. The generational attack, offensive, assault on muti-cultural Australia has left us divided, and embarrassed of Australia’s wonderful past. All to serve the self seeking, selfish interests of a very small militant, embittered and clearly corrupt organisation. The goal of separatism seems to be this small ‘elite’ group within an equally small group's agenda. This small ‘elite’ group has garnered a great deal of power, and influence thanks to some very clever, and less than honest use of every available manipulation available to them, especially the weaponization of race. More offensive outrageous racism; the Greens or ALP would expound, while less deceitful, honest straightforward people might simply say accurate. Actually today's native Australians stole this land from the previous settlers, the preceding Aborigines, the oldest evidence of humans in Australia is 47,000 y.a. Mungo Man. But he was from an earlier migration than today's native Australians. Australia’s current Aborigines, today's native Australians started arriving from Papua 30,000 y.a and have been arriving ever since. Some "Aboriginal" ancestors likewise arrived after the first fleet. Native Australians are not indigenous, all humans evolved in Africa and they are not aboriginal, Mungo Man's people were the original Australians. Today's natives are just another wave of migrants. But instead of us unifying under this historical fact, we’ve chosen to make this a race concerning race? Those here first are somehow better than those that arrived here more recently. Because this is how we should judge the quality of human beings? Additionally we should also group all people ethnically, because this is also now the most important element of a human being's character?