Old Japanese proverb "It is better to be a warrior in a garden, then a gardener in a war"

@user-FUCKYOU18

2 ай бұрын

Japanese still lost the wars & you taking advice of looser

@anthonyjennings1238

15 күн бұрын

Not bad coming from a country that ended up with two suns dropped on it.

It’s a step in the right direction, we need to spend more and things need to happen a lot quicker.

You forgot the 'Ghost bat' and the 'Redback'

@melpikos8533

2 ай бұрын

We focused on the 9 projects with the largest budget. Ghost bat is only $400m at this stage.

@tube2211ification

2 ай бұрын

And the K9 howitzers

@BTR-xw4of

2 ай бұрын

For his very well outlined informative video perhaps he deliberately omitted both for time? But you raise a really good point. Both platforms are innovatively cutting edge, this is an entirely new area Defence industry has taken on and arguably should be hugely supported. Like Nulka, Ceafar and the 'Bushmaster' [only some examples] Australian defence innovation combined with exceptional leadership + R + D has set RAAF on a path to acquiring brilliant capabilities. Ukraine as all know has truly enlightened all to the offensive effectiveness of drones of varying sizes - but like the 'Triton', both platforms will revolutionise DoD capabilities. "Redback" imo was the inferior platform but was/has been selected - the issue I don't know how many who are into defence realise is 'politics' is DEEPLY embedded with both sides of the political isle when it comes to defence buys. The marginal Federal seat of Corio [there's 151 House Reps seats nationally] is a good example. Liberal seat but very marginal - and what do you know the South Korean self tracked artillery will be built there - a 'Greenfield site' the billions being invested is imo best practice - especially if the Commonwealth can wring/win export orders like the 'Boxer' has in yet 'another' marginal and critical QLD seat. Further billion dollar investment in RAAF bases in our north, in large part to allow USAF platforms to rotate with the right infrastructure required is to be objective, a huge outcome. The Army was reamed in the [rubbery] Budget - waiting to next year for the full delivery of the Apache is not good enough - they were selected by Dutton many years ago - FYI x2 'Apache E's' are now in Australia and IOC + these 2 latest brilliant 'E's' will give Army Aviation some serious experience and training will be ramped up for the 2025 full delivery. And also the 'Blackhawk' selection was 'finally' green lit - another over due selection when Russell originally 'wanted' this platform [as they did the Apache] nearly 2 decades ago but the then government/Min Def went with an immature design and tried to 'Australianise' the platform. What a lot of Australians that work in defence in the private/public sectors do NOT know is Min Def Dutton was overseeing the FMS/MOTS buy of 'Reaper' drones which would have for the first time given the ADF a massive offensive capability. We taxpayers paid for tens of ADF personnel to be housed, paid for and trained in Arizona from US operators. Now one of imo 'the' most effective 'checks' on the government of the day which invariably always gets over looked - is Senate Estimates - well just prior to the last election Min Def Dutton demanded Russell come up with "Budget Savings". And guess which mature, years funded program got the flick? Yes - the 'Reaper' program. Hence - the ADF wasted years of training their personnel to operate a unprecedented lethal offensive platform 'just' to make Min Def Dutton's Budget numbers 'add up'. That Dutton 'accepted' the imbeciles at Russell's recommendation will remain a stain on Dutton's career and legacy [and I support Dutton fully but deal in facts/evidence/context - the 3 core ideals as LLB students we are hammered]. Oh and the woke [thought he was a shoo in as GG Angus 'd#####' Campbell refused to name the platform "attack drones' due to 'not' upsetting the murderous regime in Beijing. Yes - the insanity, the pc wokeness that has captured the entire mid and senior level Russell officer cadre is sickening and a bloody disgrace and national scandal. I mean we just 'cannot' upset a rampaging China now can we. 'Redback' numbers will have a significant effect on how Army organises it's Divisional/Brigade structure. Marles if he was 'smart' should have left the door open for 'additional' unit buys. Who knows with a Federal election around the corner Marles just might act like he 'knows' what he is doing and the critical importance of having an effective land force structure. For me THE single biggest win beside 'Blackhawk/Apache/Aussie Thunder' was ARMY WILL be getting their M1A2 SEP> MBTs. The pressure from the 'appeasers' in Canberra, the Hugh White, Geoffrey Barker cabal have been hardened consistent opponents of this MBT buy and have been relentless in lobbying privately + publicly for this critical platform to be dumped. It is now 100% locked in.

@richardthomson4693

2 ай бұрын

@@BTR-xw4of A massive list of pro LNP diatribe. You shit on labor but omit that Tiger and Taipan were both LNP govt decision. The apaches and Blackhawk delivery 'being late and labor fault' is rubbish. They were ordered under the LNP govt, which is the right decision. Its the US that says when they are delivered. Thanks the labor govt we are getting some (4) of the blackhawks early, due to getting a few of the american army build slots, we also getting apaches early again US build slots. We also bought two of the recently retired UK WAH-64D for ground handling training. They arrived in AUS last week. Unless you got some source theres no apache E in australia yet. The AH-64E-V6.5 we are getting only completed flight testing OCT 2023. First actual deliveries will be 2025 with bulk and completion in 2026. Theres rumor that expeditied delivery of some E's in late 2024 for training but thats just rumors selected by Dutton many years ago - No it was 2022 when we signed the contract. As above theres a waiting list for these, we get them when its our turn The redback was a no brainer, the only real negative it has is that turret is israeli and it handles artic conditions poorly, Not a huge issue for AUS or Israel but it was for poland when they tested one. Redback uses the same gear box and transmission as K9/K10. Also M1 also uses the same transmission, they will all be centralized in the same location so its a pretty good logistics move.

@mitchellvangrieken3900

2 ай бұрын

@@BTR-xw4ofdo you type these out on a keyboard? If not, that's impressive

A good summary, Mel. You did well to give the updates without sabre-rattling! As a charity that supports Aussies in uniform, we say thanks!

@melpikos8533

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for the kind words! Glad you liked it

We need to scrap the Arafura OPV as it’s under armed for the emerging threats. Transfer the Arafura class and Cape Class boats to the Border Force and give Border Force all maritime constabulary duties as a coast guard. Get the RAN corvettes and proper mine clearance vessels then make sure it is used only for war fighting. Plus get the RAN some type 218SG diesel electric subs from Germany to plug the gap until nuclear subs come online. Next replace all M114AS4 APC’s with Redbacks not just 140 or so which is barely enough to equip a battalion.

@Nathan-ry3yu

2 ай бұрын

The entire navel review is a screw up . 6 32 cell hunter.class frigate 11 new smaller frigate 6 optional crewed surface combating ships? Tier 1 hunter.class and 3 current hobart class AWDs? They would had been better of upgunned the hunter.class with the 96 cell VLS for new AWDs And added 17 new smaller frigate for ASW vessels instead of 6 optional crewed ships. They could easily build 11 navantia Alpha 5000 frigate with 32 cell VLS and built 6 navantia Alpha 3000 corvettes with 16 cell VLS. And sold 3 hobart class fo New Zealand Instead they going for 6 large ASW vessels. 11 smaller ASW vessels and 6 light missile optional crewed ships. 23 ships all ASW capability and only 3 medium sized existing AWDs. Theirs no proper balance between AWDs and ASW vessel's leaving RAN a capability to be able to strike back The guy in the video states the hunter.class will be Australia largest ships. Whoop Doo! They will also be 16 cell VLS less than the current hobart class. Maybe they think the radar will scare them away. ? Yes the OPV will end up been transferred to China for future fishing boats.

@BRADLEY856

2 ай бұрын

👍

@shanehansen3705

2 ай бұрын

can easily be up armed to the standard of those other countries use of that class

@BeerGutGuy

2 ай бұрын

You don’t understand the purpose of the Arafura…….its job is to deploy and recover XLUUV’s that would detect Chinese submarines so P8 can destroy them. The XLUUV’s would also protect our ports while the RAN operated outside Australian waters. Arafura is nothing more than a big taxi (during war time). The government is cancelling the Arafura because they think the Virginia class can do everything, same reason they are now reducing the number of Hunter class frigates……a huge mistake.

@danielwatson6000

Ай бұрын

Give boder force auukus ...stop them at the border

Lots of missing projects here. Upgrade & replacement patrol boats. Possible acquisition of light frigates or Corvettes. Upgrade South Australian shipbuilding facilities. Upgrade Eastern Naval facilities. Drone ships, foxbat or loyal wingman aircraft. Just to name a few. I would like us to develop capabilities to build Javelin or similar MANPADS. Patriot Air Defence Systems & Artillery systems with a stock pile of ammunition. Where are we with light arms manufacturing? I believe there is a great sniper rifle being made in Adelaide? Great video. I would like to learn more.

@corvanphoenix

29 күн бұрын

Thales still build quality firearms for the military in Lithgow, which has been doing it since before WWII.

Aukus Submarines are a no brainer considering the different stand off distance as well as they are delivery platforms for the much longer range Tomahawk missiles as what we have now have on current Collins subs are short range harpoon missiles.

Aussie land has lots of Iron. I would think getting into the weapons manufacturing would be a good idea.

@codebasher1

2 ай бұрын

You're right. If a nation as tiny as Israel can do it, why not us.

@kallekas8551

2 ай бұрын

Problem is that all the brains have gone overseas…leaving the morons behind.

@user-FUCKYOU18

2 ай бұрын

​@@codebasher1Israeli got supported from around the world From zionist Christians

@liddz434

2 ай бұрын

@@codebasher1 Well they may have benefited slightly from the $260 billion dollars' worth of military aid from the US since the end of WW2...

@nuggetella

2 ай бұрын

Trillions spent on weaponry, yet poverty continues to increase... ❤️‍🔥

If a country teaches its children to hate their country they won’t want to defend it. If governments continue to treat those that do and have served with contempt fewer still will hear the call. If the country has only fuel and munitions to fight for a week then the government is negligent.

@concernedaussie1330

2 ай бұрын

Bang on . The government is the enemy ! That’s the only way I see it . Am I wrong ???? What depth of defence do we have ? Wars are won buy manufacturing capacity & short logistical chains , along with the population & infrastructure to play the long attritional game . Again the government has massively failed us. Huge change in government needed ! Imo of course.

@ObjectiveAnalysis

2 ай бұрын

Nationalism is for low IQ juveniles Edit: it’s funny how you right wing bots usually have no content, subscriptions etc on your channels 🤔

UAVs and drones are the future for weapons systems. These advanced weapons will use state-of-the-art AI. This removes the need for large conventional military forces. There are not enough personnel to fill the roles that will be needed in the future. So, it will be necessary to use autonomous technology.

@user-FUCKYOU18

2 ай бұрын

No,it nuclear weapon still stand the test of times

Rock On Aussies. This all looks good. If "the big one" ever happens you will be glad you have this. All this stuff is the best and lasts for 40 years. If it doesn't happen, then it will be because you did this. Peace cost money.

@goldcoasttime

2 ай бұрын

You think, American military spending has bankrupted the US, it now resembles a 3rd world in fact its worse the have health and life expectancy lower than Cuba

@davidhenderson1950

2 ай бұрын

peace especially cost money when you are a vassel of the usa

@kensommers5096

2 ай бұрын

​@@davidhenderson1950voice of the uneducated!🤠👍❤️🇭🇲

@silentblackhole

2 ай бұрын

​​@@davidhenderson1950copying somebody else's sound bites doesn't make you smart. We have similar values to the US and our partnership is our of choice. The US doesn't pull any strings here. Might be hard for you to understand, but people who have similar values choose to defend their shared values.

@TenOrbital

2 ай бұрын

@@davidhenderson1950- found the CCP bot

SPEND MORE! If anyone is interested Britain spent less than 3% on defence before 1939. By 1940 it was 18%, come 1941 it was 46% of total Gdp. Spend more before it starts so that it may not.🤠👍❤️🇭🇲

we absolutely need these, we need more than this

The defence spending needs to quadruple . A vast amount needs to be spent on production of small arms and artillery munitions . Look at the Ukraine for that analogie . We depend far to much on the US for arms . Fast forward to the BS nuclear subes , Just creating them will need one third of the current defence force numbers . We struggle to get submariners as it is , let alone the support personnel to facilitate them that exceeded the current defense force numbers . WHere are those numbers coming from , considering the defense force is losing members faster than they recrute .

It’s about bloody time. The only problem with this is, it’s spread over far to big a timeframe and although much better than what we have, it’s still not enough. This needs to be completed within five years. It might sound ridiculous but it’s doable if they made the right commitments.

Australia has always been frugal with defence spending throughout the years, and because of this the initial price tag is heavy for this updated procurement. We dont want to be a walk in the park for any adversary now or in the future, I think this is absolutely necessary, and this is obvious because we are not alone in our increase in defence budget

About time we stood fucken up,regards mate

Littoral operations. Good idea. We’ve done a lot of them lately

The problem I have with these costings is that they are mostly projected through-life cost over decades of operation. It’s difficult to put a per-unit cost on something as complex as a warship or submarine though so it’s understandable.

Our local military industrial systems must be funded to a point where our defence is locally sourced. Even if it costs twice as much, make it here, spend it here, design it here.

Australia could easily afford two small 30,000 ton light carriers from South Korea, the DSME design that could carry 16 F-35b aircraft along with helicopters. The KSS3 submarines have a crew of 35-40 people instead of trying to find crews of nuke boats like the Virginia which needs 135 plus and the Astute’s which need 100.

@Generaldisorderly

2 ай бұрын

We do have two like light carriers in the Canberra class but the thing which annoyed me was, that if we weren't going to operate STOVL aircraft why put a ramp on the front?

@philodonoghue3062

2 ай бұрын

Japanese gone the same way - but call them helicopter carriers nudge nudge. The decks obviously can accommodate naval aircraft

@crow7505

2 ай бұрын

​@@Generaldisorderlythe ski jump is required because a fully armed and fuelled f35 b is too heavy for VT without a rolling start same with harriers that's why even British aircraft carrier's have them.

@justbecause3187

2 ай бұрын

​@@Generaldisorderlythe ski jumps are only there because they were included in the design we got from the Spanish. It does however hint at the tantalising(if remote) possibility for them to one day be upgraded to support F35b operations. But yeah I wouldn't go holding my breath on that one.

@HenriHattar

2 ай бұрын

In actual fact it could afford 2 x Eliz Class carriers plus 3 c extra Juan carlos class ( with certain upgrades) plus several more surface ships BUT this is NOT the problem..the prolem is in MANNING these platforms, to wish to purchase less tech or lethal via the Sth Korean model is madness.

Yup. Agree. We need to spend lots more on our defence. History shows us that deterrents is the best way to prevent war. 👍 You forgot to mention about our purchase of US cruise missiles. These will give the defence force strike capability into the South China sea. Without even leaving Australian air space.

The government must turn it's northern islands such as Cocos island, Christmas island, Melville and even Hammond, Horn and Thursday islands into long range missile/radar, air bases if it is going to take Australia's defence seriously!

@thomasb5600

2 ай бұрын

They are expanding military facilities on Cocos and Christmas That's why the infrastructure bill is high

@GrahamHunt-pz3re

Ай бұрын

What about PNG, it's an open door that is virtually defenceless. With our close relationship we should be negotiating a forward base in the north of that country for both our country's defence.

Let’s hope the Boxer has active protection. Ukraine has shown just how vulnerable armour is with only passive protection

@OldFellaDave

2 ай бұрын

Advancing without infantry and air makes armour and vehicle vulnerable. Things both Ukraine and Russia seem to not have learnt yet after 3 years and horrendous losses.

The cost overruns are criminal! What I find disappointing is every defence project purchase is all state of the art equipment. There’s no back up secondary equipment purchases that are cheaper and cost a lot less to use over their life span!

@concernedaussie1330

2 ай бұрын

100% We will use equipment faster then we can replace it & will will definitely take losses . Most likely large losses with our piss poor anti air capabilities.

@michaela5311

2 ай бұрын

I imagine much of the cost overrun is simply due to the debasement of AUD via inflation and poor economic management.

@petermaver8466

2 ай бұрын

Yeah and as both Burma and the Ukraine have proven that very expensive gear has a 24 hour life span once in the battle area.

@boogle785

2 ай бұрын

@@michaela5311 Yes those mongrels from the Lib/Nats who had their heads up there arses for a period of 9 years giving contracts and outsourcing everything to their corporate mates (so when they complete their political lives and return to the "Real World" they get high paying jobs from their US and UK corporate overlords) and completely gutting public service of specialised expertise. It took current treasurer Jim Chalmers only 1 budget to rebalance the books and is on a steady path to getting Australia back to fiscal responsibility . Go Jimbo !!!

We should have completed the full LAN purchase of Boxers and IFV’s.

A good time to upgrade our deterrent options

Mate,they'll spend a bazillion dollars in Canberra doing studies,reviews and feasibility. The top brass will give themselves more medals for all the hard work,then cancel almost everything.

Spending 'Big' on Defence Projects like... 1. Reducing 3 Hunter Class Frigates 2. Reducing 6 OPVs 3. Decommissioning 2 Anzac Class Frigates 4. Promising something in 12 years when Labor may not be in Government. 5. Reduction in Army and RAAF 6. Reducing staff numbers with no plan

@Matt_JJz

2 ай бұрын

Well with the hunter class, they are replacing them with 11 new frigates. So instead of getting 9 frigates, we are going to get 17. 6 heavy frigates (basically destroyers) and 11 frigates, with the 3 destroyers we recently built. But yeah they are cutting military projects and it is so annoying.

@Shilo-fc3xm

2 ай бұрын

Mm. Good point, Birch. I was thinking about this as he was mentioning it. I hope they go to a yard and not directly to scrap. It is after all the back end of global conflicts that nations often wish they had their current though SLIGHTLY outdated platforms sitting in a dry dock somewhere. Look at the carnage we were capable of delivering with our "Scrap Iron Flotilla" in the Med in WW2. Even in the Pacific, not like we were (as a standalone) operating at the absolute apex of current/contemporary technology the world. Yeah.... They should put that shit on ice.

@Nathan-ry3yu

2 ай бұрын

More than half of it will remain on paper mate by the time they get halfway through any of thoghs projects a lot of it will get cancelled. You can't plan for defence within 20 years of projects. As a lot of technology changes and puts you back into drawing board. If they can't deliver equipment within a decade. It's all thing air​@Matt_JJz

@arminius8631

2 ай бұрын

RAAF is increasing CE.

@ralphhillier676

2 ай бұрын

with you

You've just earnt yourself a new subscriber! Any news on drones/loyal wingman and cyber defence strategies? Great work Mel.

I served My father and brother served as did generations before us. I’ve warned my children, don’t do it. It’s not worth it

@douglasgreene9340

2 ай бұрын

I served with 5 deployments and my government has shafted me dva. This country hates men and fathers. Our society isn't worth pissing on at this point.

I have seen Australia is thinking about raising the F-35 order to 100 total. That would cost around 3 billion. I always thought the main advantage of stealth was to get as close to the target, such as enemy radar/air defense systems etc, as possible. After that you send in aircraft like F-15s or F-18s that are 50% faster, and significantly cheaper, to bomb the crap out of everything else. For 28 more F-35s, Australia could buy 40 more FA-18 super hornets. They have a comparable range and, without an aircraft carrier, Australia needs as much as that as they can get.

@dennisrichards7994

2 ай бұрын

Why would you want that utter junk !!!

@thomasb5600

2 ай бұрын

Why buy we already have that number in storage. If planned right Ghost bat goes in with F18 Growlers first.

@petersinclair3997

2 ай бұрын

B-21s, when available? Or, might the US continue to house other strategic bombers in Australia?

@garrymoss2079

2 ай бұрын

Should be buying F35B lighting strike II , vertical take off . When the first wave of missiles hit our airstrips we are cooked . These things can be deployed from football fields if need be .

@dennisrichards7994

2 ай бұрын

@@garrymoss2079 That utter junk wouldn't stand a chance against the best missiles and radars on earth , come off the drugs and get back to reality !!!

It is good to see Australia significantly modernize it's forces. Now, if the government will follow through and perhaps even pull in the acquisitions, Australia will become a mighty anchor in the Pacific.

The biggest issue with the Australian Military is we spend big but we do not get enough out of it, and it takes way too long to deliever. For example the AUKUS Class will be fully delivered in 2060! That is a insanely long time waiting, and even though we are getting Virginia's in the 2030s to cover the wait; we are only getting 3 when we should be getting 8 to reach fleet full operational capabilities. We need more of everything, yes having the best technology in the world is a huge bonus but lack of numbers screws us over a lot. I personally think over the next 10 years Australia should focus on building a well sized military, not just a super advanced one. Focus more on the now, and not the far future. Focus more on aerospace capabilities & defence (which luckily is happening and we just got news of a new air defence network). Australia should also look into getting aircraft carriers and long range missiles, as that is the best way to project our military capabilities. It is expensive, but it is a necessary price to pay in order to defend Australia and her people.

@timlewis4623

2 ай бұрын

keep in mind, we are getting upto 3 "operational" V class subs which is equivalent to a fleet of 10 as you have 2/3 in service mode at any one time.

@BTR-xw4of

2 ай бұрын

Huge agreement here. The problem is multifold - nept Min Def's who are 'captured' by the dysfunctional and most detested Commonwealth APS Dept DoD, who imo having audited Russell multiple times/been a DLO at Russell and other 'co-ordinating' Depts - the 'culture' at Russell cannot ever be changed. Second - MOTS/FMS for the 'big' defence projects is a cost effective no brainer - the F105's and RAN replenishment/tanker ships are a perfect example. Although the 'Juan Carlos' LHDs 'were' built by Navantia in Spain and then fitted out here, so the skill base is as consistent/effective as possible. Smart kit acquisition - Spain have the build infrastructure at Ferrol - we get our defence industrial SME's deeply involved, up skilling and boosting our SME supply side. The other massive problem [Seasprite etc] is Russell ALWAYS has to bastardise defence buys and 'Australianise'' the platform. That this rabble of an open border government + DoD 'Alphabet' Department under a part time Min Def Marles cannot get a down selection within 12 months for MOTS/FMS 'Tier 2' Corvette naval buys is just appalling. All know Navantia made multiple government to government offers for an additional AWD's with a locked in price $3b per ship, but were fobbed off - so now RAN has to wait how many years for the 'Tier 2' platforms? It is a national scandal the holistic approach to defence by government's and the useless very much so Russell clowns, and their refusal to change. Why TF would a Min Def 'green light' the burying of perfectly operational NH90's? This is one of 'the' single biggest scandals in our defence history. The ALP could have sold them and put that revenue back into Consolidated Revenue for the Defence Budget - it does my head in and the total uselessness of the wannabe 4 star bloated Officer cadre at Russell are the reason I transferred out of my previous role. The ANAO does report after report - DoD 'agree' to "fully implement the recommendations of the ANAO Audit" but hardly ever does. It is just criminal.

@Matt_JJz

2 ай бұрын

@timlewis4623 The operational power ≠ Operational Capability As 3 submarines cannot cover all of Australia, that is why we need 8 until the Aukus class arrives

@boogle785

2 ай бұрын

Are you willing to pay higher taxes as I dont want the limited social care we currently have being further compromised !!

@kallekas8551

2 ай бұрын

@@boogle785🫵🤡👍

Arafura seems more like a corvette - which are being increasingly being built and operated by the Scandinavian countries for which they are ideal for the North Sea and Baltic

2 ай бұрын

I've seen them. They are pretty small. Big for a patrol ship but small for a warship.

All this Defence spending is well and good but the thing is, we are dependent on crude oil supplied from overseas. In a war our oil supply will be cut off and we'll run out of fuel to run our Defence Force within a few weeks.

You missed quite a bit, including but not limited to the Abrams upgrade program, Nasams air defence, Himars, all the new ship types they're going to create and so on.

Money well spent!!!

I can't believe how much the boxer project costs especially when you see how vulnerable these machines have become. If countries like Croatia can buy the Patria (an excellent combat proven platform from Finland) for a few hundred million for about 150 vehicles, I don't get how the boxer can cost so much more?

What about the B21? Or did I miss that?

@Nathan-ry3yu

2 ай бұрын

They decide not to even look into a long range bomber. They dismissed the entire idea

The LOTE Collins extension is arguably the biggest upgrade of any air, sea, land ADF platform in history. The time and sheer scale of the LOTE is staggering. But now to the most dysfunctional Dept in the APS - DoD/Russell. Reports this week exposed the simple RAN Corvette down selection process has fubered the Dept once again with respect to the South Korean option [s]. I could pen a PhD thesis on how pathetic Russell is. Singapore makes us look a joke.

Defence spending needs both expansion and cost control. The ADO are notorious for overpaying, especially on infrastructure associated with new equipment and materiel. It’s also losing money on support services contracts. Better VFM and a bigger budget would start to put us where we need to be.

What's the draught on your new submarines ? What is their future roles. Here in what you call the South China Sea it's very shallow...very very shallow. Chinese boats reflect that in their draughts are 6mtres. Are you making boats more suitable for the Nth Atlantic. Can someone help me.

We spend too much on buying a handful of expensive high tech systems that would last a few weeks in a full on war. We don't seem to be able to accept our small power status and keep buying into these vanity projects. We get just enough to equip our units, sometimes not even that, with no reserves whatsoever. Did we really need to get three squadrons of F35's when we could have had 5 squadrons of a cheaper aircraft and had two squadrons of planes in reserve, for example.

@lindsaybaker9480

2 ай бұрын

We should have five fighter squadrons instead of only three, in a sense we already have that because the two squadrons that operated F-111 aircraft now fly Super Hornets. We should have bought two squadrons of F-35A and three of Super Hornets with the F-18e/f to be replaced by the South Korean KF-21 fighter jet.

While we have built some pretty good gear, Hobart Class Destroyers one of the projects which is dumb is the Hunter Class Frigate. All that money into a ship that will be poorly armed. 32 VLS is no where near enough, and they are bigger than the Hobart class. We can get better bang for buck by cutting back the Hunter Class from 9-6, upgrade weapons to a least 48 VLS and in the mean time build another 3 Hobart Class destroyers. JMO

You are doing the right thing. Look at us in Europe now. Better safe than sorry.

Rather sadly, I am in full agreement with Paul Keating, in the fact that we were duped on the SSN deal. We are offering them base facilities, enormous lead times for construction and delivery, and should have entered into the negotiations more shrewdly, I believe. We seemed to be so overawed at joining the exclusive nuclear club, that we treated it like our first Platinum American Express card, which it was. We are paying something in the order of twice what we should have agreed to. In the area of Helo's and F-35s, we did reasonably well I believe, but only if we have ready and timely access to software and hardware upgrades. What is our current fleet of aerial tankers looking like, as they would be critical to our RAAF.

In any large war or threat home land defence will be the most important . Securing infrastructure and civil order ,

3:28 he fell😂 but continued

Not enough money being spent we need to build our own fighters. Boats arrive undetected from the northern Aus. This in really big country we do not have other countries wanting destroy us it's difficult for us to how really protect this country.

@joncarolyn

2 ай бұрын

Australia doesn’t have the technology or the industry to build better fighter planes than the USA

@concernedaussie1330

2 ай бұрын

@@joncarolyndon’t need better . Lots of simple air frames with very good missiles & huge amounts of air defence. Land , sea & air launched anti air weapons. Multi layered air defence . Mobile missile systems are far cheaper then airfields, expensive fast jets , pilots & ground crews & their families ect ect ect

@joncarolyn

Ай бұрын

@@concernedaussie1330 if you want people to fight, you have to supply the best. Only an idiot would sign up to fight using inferior equipment. Or even suggest using it for that matter.

@concernedaussie1330

Ай бұрын

@@joncarolyn what’s the alternative ???? Bury one’s head in the sand & pretend nothing can ever happen down here . Well tell that to the pow’s of WW2 & slaves & massacred people’s thought out history. Gaza & Ukraine right now . Or learn skills & knowledge & how to duck & weave with the weather & climate to best suit the defender on their home soil . I my self would prefer to have a few years of training under my belt & have some limited but totally effective weapons . History is full of warriors , that fought with spirt & pride & a never say die attitude against all odds & came out on top. You may not be cut from that same cloth , only a idiot do nothing & hope things will just work themselves out.

@concernedaussie1330

25 күн бұрын

@@joncarolyn the best doesn't have to be the most expensive . The so called best that we have just spent over a decade & a half of defense budget on. Is already obsolete before the plans are drawn . Underwater surveillance systems in the next 4 years are speculated to make nowhere safe for submersible s. Drones of all kinds have basically made most super expensive legacy systems obsolete . 70 thousand defense personal certainly can't defend the Australian continent. Let alone rounding up all of the duel nationals or ethnic groups that have ties with our enemies. & the personal needed to man & guard the internment camps.

Having the gear is one thing, bodies in the gear is another. A question is going to be personnel going forward. Maybe a reserve force of trained navel and air force part time members would help. The USA has a backup of trained pilots and ground staff in reserve. Same goes for the navy. Maybe a large full time force is not necessary when a core of full time professionals and a "back up" of reserve members who can be called into action could be setup. Like the CFA and the professional full timers in fire fighting, or the SES. Reservists get paid, training and could flip in and out of full time participation. Add some old style war service loans at low interest and they would be kicking the door down to join. Interested to see what people think about this.

@GrahamHunt-pz3re

Ай бұрын

Let's get serious and recreate cadet schemes in schools, promote two year gape years for suitable kids and offer incentives such as free HECS. & TAFE or cheap housing loans. Continuing prospects of service in the reserves or permanent services with a really good superannuation scheme and free medical. A few little incentive like that would help. You could also include service in SES, hospitals, police etc.

@frankus54

Ай бұрын

@@GrahamHunt-pz3re Bang on.

if Au see his nuke sub ever as US is not able to build them, what is sad that in the contract with France a nuke sub was available but was refuse because it was nuclear, not a loss as Netherland buy the model made for Australia with diesel. The thing is that the future Ankus is not yet design and UK has so much problem with its astute class, actually that is not able to launch a trident missile correctly.

Better late then never, we should have been rearming ourselves years ago

It's hard to cover every aspect of such a multi-faceted subject like defense, you could do these later, howitzers, Redback, Ghost Bat, Ghost Shark, other drones, Tomahawk, and other missiles.

@MelPikos

Ай бұрын

Working on one of these right now...

For the cost of eight nuclear submarines we could have probably thirty advanced conventional submarines like the South Korean KSS 3 batch two design.

@boogle785

2 ай бұрын

This is the price of US partnership. We will be contributing to the total construction program of the most advanced submarines in the world. So if there is a war they can flood australia with skilled labour at short notice thus ramping up construction numbers in shorter time periods. Just look at what the US did in WW2 and how they supplied the rest of the world with basically everything . We just need the infrastructure in place and they can supply excess requirements for labour and design and the ability to increase production at short notice. We have lots of metal and electrical workers in the mining industry we can repurpose but it will come down to total production of China, Russia, North Korea vs US Japan Europe Canada and Australia as the main protagonists.

@markmackenzie5130

2 ай бұрын

true the Japanese one is even better for around b each the money we could be saving and i think with recent change should be buy the light Japanese frigates too they can pick them up for about 400 m each buy 2 of production line and build 6 here

until the defence department get realistic delivery times for equipment it will be useless as most of the equipment will be obsolete by delivery or as is happening delivery will be delayed for up dates

I'm all for it, we should spend more.

All aussies have forgotten the need of additional AOR ships to support such fleet.😮😮😮

Sir I have a concern we are building all these vessels and airships etc etc can you do a video on our personal like how many soldiers does it take to run 1 battleship compared to our entire arsenal and our ability to man all of them if need be

$400 billion+ on our Navy and Subs? We should build a base on Christmas Island for the Hornets and call it the Hornets Nest and station a submarine there also.

We do not spend anywhere near enough - nothing could be more obvious - if there is a high probability of a major conflict with a formidable adversary within 3 years, then spending our current 2% of GDP on Defence is absolute peanuts, we need to go significantly higher and I am not saying 2.5% of GDP, more like 10% or higher. You need to think what equipment and supplies you need to successfully defeat a formidable adversary if conflict were to occur within 3 years, that is how to look at the challenge. Apparently they are 80% self sufficient in petroleum fuel, therefore, blocking the Malacca Straits is probably pointless (but we would still need to have that capability).

So let me get this right, Mel.. The Arafura Class of off shore Patrol vessels, are off shore patrol Vessels? Right. Ok. I'm with you. Lol. (P.S) - Nice house by the way. Lend us a 50? 😅 Thanks for the video.

now is the time for military spending

Raw dollar amounts do not reveal a nation's expenditures on defense. The true measure os the percentage of a nation's GDP spent on defense. Look historically at the percentage of GDP Australia spent on defense.

Not convinced by the expressed need for nuclear submarines. Do we even have an air defence system? And I’m suspicious about our further integration into US preparations in the Asia/Pacific.

Don’t forget the Blackhawk aquistion

Australia needs to spend money on defence. One area that needs more funding is disaster relief capability.

Every big ticket item requires heaps of subsidaries

I would like to know whether Australia is spending 3-4% of GNP per year?

You know that the AUKUS attack nuclear powered subs cost will blow out above 368 billiion. This defence warship program dwarfs all other defence programs by a whopping amount. It also needs more than 3 to 5 times the crew members of a Collins class sub. Seems a huge expensive program for relatively lttle deterrence value to the PLAAN and the CCP.

What Australia needs is a lot of long range defensive and attack missiles silo systems. The nuclear subs are too far away in time to be a deterrent. Spending all that money on HMAS Stirling base when there is no guarantee of even getting the nuclear subs. Who knows what will happen in future US governments, they might change their mind.

We are surrounded by water we need frigates, aircraft carriers, submarines more than we need tanks.

The Government is spending far too little on defence.

Been asleep at the wheel for 20 years it all sounds great but we will need it much sooner than the proposed dates...

Missed some of the real big ones, such as AIR6500 and JP9102, which dwarfs some on this list

F35A is not really a supersonic fighter, it melts it engines in about 15 minutes at full speed.

@justbecause3187

2 ай бұрын

Apparently the F35 can "super cruise" at Mach 1.2 for about 150 miles and maxes out at Mach 1.6.

@kenreckless2757

2 ай бұрын

Supersonic speed is useful, but not a lot of fighting goes on at those speeds. Speed is not everything.

More DDG's sooner?

I love how much effort you have to put in to enunciate every word like Malcolm Turnbull so that yanks can understand you. 😂😂

Too many years of Liberal/Labor parties producing ships and vehicles that aren't equipped to fight a war in fact as was just demonstrated that the government of Australia wouldn't send any ships to reinforce the western alliance efforts to assist Israel from a Hamas/Iranian/Hizbollah attack. Our ships we're told are unable to defend against drone attacks. The US's policy is now geared to producing a military with more modular interchangeable updated weapons exchanges. Hope we're not headed for a finding out that years of government playing politics has endangered the whole nation.

How about the ADF is self sufficient in ammo and fuel as a base requirement? It was confirmed in the Senate that the ADF has 1 day's ammo supply and maybe 7 days fuel supply. Globally look at Burma where a US support regime is being beaten by rebels only armed with .22 3D printed weapons. Or let's look at the last 20 years where all of the "high tech weapons" were beaten by blokes in Utes with a mobile phone and access to a hardware store. We also now have 2 politicians that have committed treason without punishment and still committing treason, does anyone really think any O/S country is going to sell us their best weapons when they know their enemies will have the blueprints before we do? I saved in the 70's in Artillery and we "liberated" a Mortar Locating Radar from the US when they left Vietnam, our blokes did no get the instruction manuals so the equipment was held at the School of Artillery to tr and work out how to use it. We asked the Yanks and they refused to supply the manuals but one day the Russian embassy delivered the manuals to us.

F35s are not designed to replace light bombers like F111's. WTF is Australia still using F111's? THey are like... 60 years old

Old bogan proverb, if you set off on a trip, better you pack the tools to fix the car lest you break down in desert and phone without signal to call NRMA road assist.

It's good idea to have nuclear submarines and nuclear aircraft carriers also

Thanks mate. Simply from a common sense perspective, I fail to see how Australia, with it's massive coastline and relatively tiny population, could possibly defend itself effectively from countries like China or Indonesia???

If we don't want to be caught with our pants down like we were in 1942 we should have been spending this money 10 years ago. We need to be self reliant.

Our forces are shrinking, it's all late, over cost, badly chosen, undermanned. OPV = small, under-guuned, better than the previous but likely to be tasked beyond their specifications. Boxer is late and over cost, the army are still depending on the remains of the ASLAV fleet. Apache will turn up too late. Collins is sticking plaster to cover for the failed procurement process of SEA1000 and the AUKUS boats, the first update will not be inservice until after 2030. Northern bases moves just undoes the previous program to move all the kit to places where it can be deployed from. Hunter is very late, over price and likely to be really late. It's a cycle of repetitive failure used to keep masses of public servants in work. CASG is the worst organisation for resisting the implementation of reviews. How much of this money gets soaked up by the REMFs?

Did you know that before Indonesia dragged in south china sea conflict, Indonesian military are specificaly designed to deal with australian military at war due to historical experiences where the two countries almost go to war many times? It is. Indonesian military are designed to able to give huge blow to australian military incase of the two countries going to war for real. If indonesian military are strong enough to deal with australian military, then the pesky malaysian will be easy to deal with Now Indonesian military are revitalized to deal against chinese invasion, that on paper have stronger military than australian

Why are we replacing old equipment with less equipment, even with there increased individual weapons platform effectiveness we are decreasing our over defence effectiveness not increasing it.

Better safe than sorry. But we need more people in the ADF. Too much technology is problematic as maintenance is trick and expensive, not mention that it can be hacked. There’s no 100% secure system.

Cancel the apaches after what has happened in ukraine. 57 aligators destryed by manpads and other weapons. Invest in more uncrewed air support and drones. Australia invented drones. But as usual we the dropped the ball and lag behind the rest of the world. The US has just cancelled the fara helicopter concept for drones.

@richardthomson4693

2 ай бұрын

So poland who arguably have the most information on the ins and outs have just ordered 96 apaches, on the other hand Japan has gone the other way. March 2023 they announced the a immediate retirement of about 90% of this attack/scout helicopter all Apaches and all the OH-1 most of the AH-1. There rumors they are walking back / delaying the retirement but so far officially they are retired and they will be buying drones to replace them.

@simonschulz415

2 ай бұрын

Apparently they have some deal with the animals in Israel to build drones here so happy days I guess.

@thomasb5600

2 ай бұрын

​@@richardthomson4693I think there are two different strategies at hand. Poland Apaches could have lots of ground cover and support. Japan is looking to fight over water, why converting helicopter carriers to aircraft too. We need to work on what is best for us. If we are littoral, Apaches work.

@jackrussell7058

2 ай бұрын

Russia completely sucks at combined arms warfare, just like the tanks when deployed without support are easy targets.

The spending, purchasing rather, should have been done years ago. But instead, they decided to have review after review after review. Now looks what is happening in the middle east, eastern Europe and the south china sea.

What happens to your navy when a hundred UAV's attack a ship at sea and use thermite grenades designed to burn there way through the hull and out he other side?

Well that doesn't make sense since the Australian government just took $3 Billion out of the defense budget.

@MelPikos H is pronounced aich not Haich. HMAS Canberra and Adelaide are the biggest ships

I wonder what percentage of GDP does Australia use to upgrade the military. ?

DEFENDING Freedom is expensive

Our military spending is a joke! NSW has 1,400 km of coastline, it's only protected by 1 unarmed NSW police corvette. 13 navy ships docked in Sydney harbour rarely goto sea these days save for a humanitarian mission to Fiji Ect. Our suburbs are plagued with crime from ethnic gangs so we need more police and riot squads. The biggest threat is a failure of multiculturalism and the various communists, Islamic and Hindu groups who will strive for power and carve up this nation. Our younger generation are weak minded and won't serve in the military.

I wonder if the Australian infantry has integrated fpv drones into its capabilities. Cheap, easy to use and we can see the impact they’re having in Ukraine.

awsome i cant aford food with bill and morgage

Glad to see some one in charge is looking at the manufacturing and maintenance of some of these systems in Australia. This helps us in peace time with jobs and supply chain in war time, as the current delays in acquiring munitions, submarines, aircraft and ships is demonstrating. It's good for our allies if we can manufacture and maintain these tools our selves as it doesn't deplete their resources and capabilities of production in war and peace time. It also means that we can provide repairs and munitions to our allies when they are in our ports and we in theirs. Whilst projecting our force capabilities is essential part of protecting our nation. Given the size of our population compared to our land mass, I would feel more comfortable with more being done on long rage detection and missile strike capability. The fact that we still get illegal immigrants turning up on our shores without us knowing should be sending alarm bells ringing. What havoc could small Seal teams do to our defenses prior to a military action in the region or God forbid an invasion. I'd like to see a video on these concerns. Perhaps I'm just unaware of our capabilities in defending our top end or West and East Coast, or Tasmania? Could Tasmania and the top end be the first strikes as a staging ground?