I made some errors when talking about NTSC frames so here's some corrections: -The animation at 5:26 isn't actually showing interlacing. If it were it would be sending beams to every OTHER line, and then the next pass would fill those in. -The 262 lines drawn by the Atari in NTSC are per interlaced field. Since interlacing skips every other line, it makes sense that the vertical resolution is half as tall as the total number of scanlines. -The vertical blank and overscan are not "intended" to provide space for game logic, but to move the beam back to the top of the screen to draw the next frame. It's just a lucky coincidence that logic can be done there. Thanks to Ashe for pointing those errors out. I'm not an expert on Atari programming, but I wanted to try it out and share what I was able to come up with. discord: discord.com/invite/EKPBjjUc65

@Cliffordlonghead

5 ай бұрын

hi

@Scudmaster11

3 ай бұрын

Hello Hello Truttle1 Ive been watching your esolang series... and encouraged me to make me own esolang... love ya videos ❤

i just wolfed down [unspecified value] bagels and now i feel h

@Lixxide

3 ай бұрын

is that value an int ?

@kornsuwin

3 ай бұрын

@@Lixxide i think so i forgoŧ

@Lixxide

3 ай бұрын

@@kornsuwin is that int >= 0 ?

@reas0

2 ай бұрын

​@@Lixxideno

@Lixxide

2 ай бұрын

@@reas0 ok

Truttle, I was just discussing the 2600 in college 2 hours ago. Your timing horrifies me.

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

imagine not having this week as spring break in college

@tazgirl_

5 ай бұрын

@@Truttle1 I'm in the UK so when I say college it's more like the end of high school I think. Also we had half term last week which is like spring break I think?

@peterkerj7357

5 ай бұрын

@@tazgirl_ *say college

@tazgirl_

5 ай бұрын

Ah, thanks

One detail people often get wrong about the ET landfill is that it was to get rid of returned ET carts. What actually happened is they were liquidating a wearhouse for tax reasons. Among the copies of ET there was other games and console parts. The game gets a bad rep. Its not that bad... Its just not that good either.

Just goes to show how impressive games like Yar's Revenge are.

@20windfisch11

5 ай бұрын

Let alone Solaris.

@juststatedtheobvious9633

5 ай бұрын

Or Kung Fu Master. Or modern homebrew like Star Castle and Pac-Man 8kb.

@0011peace

5 ай бұрын

Raiders of the Lost Ark i firsr console with an invetory s more than 1

@GarryGri

2 ай бұрын

There are loads of accomplished games on the ATARI 2600, the original Pac-Man from ATARI was one of the worst, not the best! A couple of my favorites are 'Smurf: Rescue in Gargamels Castle' and 'Dark Chambers' a really striped down Gauntlet, or dandy, clone.

The beginning of the video having one full second of silence made me think my headphones weren't on during that second. I guess that's how rare it is for a video to not immediately start with some kind of noise.

The 6502 has a BCD mode, or binary coded decimal, which works VERY well in contexts like this. You can use the same display logic you have now ..... worked very well in the 2600 games I've put together.

14:20 I'm pretty sure the 2600 supports BCD mode, which automatically skips A-F for exactly this reason

@sa3270

5 ай бұрын

It absolutely does. Unless you're programming on the variant used in the NES.

16 Kilobytes of Ram back in 1977 was around $400 or more.. and that's 1977 dollars. the atari 2600 had 128 BYTES of ram, not even 1 KB

@cerulity32k

15 күн бұрын

Good thing is, you don't have to worry about going outside the zeropage. It's all zeropage!

We are so spoiled these days as programmers, especially game programmers. It's good to appreciate that by looking back at these kinds of things.

Back in the good old CRT days, when monitors didn't have a horizontal resolution

@matthewrease2376

5 ай бұрын

Color displays do.

@Mrshoujo

5 ай бұрын

CRTs have infinite resolution.

@GarryGri

2 ай бұрын

They did, you thinking is just wrong on this. It doesn't work like a modern display.

Growing up my parents and sister were big gamers. We always had the newest systems, and got days off school for big releases. It was always a race to get to the systems after school. But one day I found an old 2600 and realized no one wanted to play it because it was ancient, so I got to see it up in my room and play when ever I wanted. It was my game console and I loved it. My dream was to make a game for the archaic machines and I had notebooks full of tiny game ideas and sprites. I've tried so many times to make my childhood dreams a reality. And failed so many times. I'm glad to see someone explain why it's so hard. It did lead to me make games for more modern hardware, though. So I still love my 2600.

@GarryGri

2 ай бұрын

I's not that difficult once you get your head around the basics of how it works. Look up what is refereed to as 'chasing the beam' any you learn to program in assembly. There are some good books on programming the ATARI 2600. Some things said on this video are not exactly best explained, or in some cases if not wrong then not entirely complete. I don't like the unnecessary sarcasm on this video.

the turtle sprite looks like an amongus knocking on a door

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

I won’t be able to unsee that now

@bobbackward6461

5 ай бұрын

AMORGGULUS

@retroboi128thegamedev

5 ай бұрын

@@Truttle1 i see an amongus smoking a pipe

@a-bombmori7393

5 ай бұрын

​@@retroboi128thegamedev "Ce n'est pas suspect"

hey, I've discovered you a few months ago on some of your 4 years old esolangs video and was wondering if you were planing on making more esolangs videos?

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

Probably

1:12 the craziest thing about the Odyssey is that it was analog. The “cartridges” were just a set of jumpers that slightly altered how the console would behave.

Just Discovered your channel, and it's uhh pretty neat!! Never really seen programming structures for older consoles (even the NES!!)

4:17 I wonder if that beigeness was because the gap between ‘video game console’ and ‘professional A/V equipment’ was smaller back then.

@jwhite5008

5 ай бұрын

not really, professional broadcasting equipment was typically large, heavy, mounted on 19" racks (or half-width ones) , and thus usually had metal frames.

@everynametaken

5 ай бұрын

From what I recall the Apple ][ did it first and everybody copied them.

@adamengelhart5159

5 ай бұрын

*Lots* of stuff was beige in those days, even outside electronics.

The truttle1 lore grows deeoer with every episode. Also please, if you ever get the opportunity, make a creaturey plushie.

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

I’ll launch a Creaturey plushie campaign at 30k subs

@Mekelaina

5 ай бұрын

@@Truttle1 let's gooo!

Awesome video! And fascinating process...!

Nintendo's Seal of Quality was also very anti-competition, particularly in North America, in that 3rd parties that wanted to develop for the NES could not develop for the competition. It's why in North America the Sega Master System had a limited, and partially what killed the Atari 7800, besides Jack Tramiel's cost and corner cutting that led to the aging Tia chip to remain for sound, rather than the much improved sound of the Pokey chip.If they were actually trying to compete with Nintendo, the 7800 was sadly tossed out to face the dragon with a wooden spoon.

Was a really fun watch! Next, you should maybe try DS development!

Well, wasn't the Channel F the first with programmable cartridges?

@matthewrease2376

5 ай бұрын

Yes, I believe so And the first home game system was the Magnavox Odyssey in 1972

@0011peace

5 ай бұрын

@@matthewrease2376well with changable gams thing like poing whuich are one game existed

@everynametaken

4 ай бұрын

@@0011peace No, the Magnavox Odyssey predated Pong (and Pong may have been lifted from a Odyssey game shown in a trade show).

@0011peace

4 ай бұрын

@@everynametaken actully rease with in 10 wees from each otehr and Tenis for 2 was released 14 years early.

I've seen Retro Game Mechanics Explained's video on racing the beam, but this was a nice refresher on how hellish it is.

Congrats on making a game for the Atari 2600 from the creator of Skeleton/Skeleton+. The two biggest advantages of the TIA were its flexibility and that it is tightly coupled to the CPU. Because the TIA registers could be modified during active video, it allowed for games to reuse the sprite registers rather than having a fixed number of sprites. And because the TIA and CPU were tightly coupled, game could change the TIA registers at exact times during the scanline, allowing for even more flexibility. Yes, horizontal positioning is difficult - a side effect of the use of LFSRs instead of counters. But LFSRs require only a trivial amount of transistors to implement, so it made sense for the TIA where every transistor was precious. (This is the same reason the Apple ][ graphics layout is weird - it saved logic and therefore money.) Note: 192 lines is what was originally suggested to ensure the all lines were visible on TVs of the era. The VCS is capable of generating more, although more than 240 typically won't be visible even on modern TVs (maybe emulators).

What other consoles will you try? I think the GameBoy (just using ASM and Z80 instructions) or Pokemon Mini (a more obscure system) would be fun ones.

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

Probably doing Vic-20 next

@0011peace

5 ай бұрын

@@Truttle1thing with you could just drectly doihe onitor or tv hooked up to it. same with most 6502 computer you could just use it with a tv. And all cold be run though tape or disk drives.

Thank you so much! Not only was this helpful, but I think this is the best video you have made! However, it would also be cool if you covered Visual Batari Basic. I’ve been trying to compile a game on there for the longest time but with disastrous results. Maybe you can help? The only tutorial that was available by tinkernut helps only so much. Regardless, videos like these are cool! Keep it up!

Can you make a video about the master system? Also love your content!

By the end of the video I started laughing out loud at the absurdity, specifically during the segment about drawing the score. Great video!

bonuspoints for the vvvvv soundtrack

Jeez, I don’t think I’ve ever seen Creaturey that mad, nor have I seen Obfuscate that sad. Great video!

128 bytes of ram.

maaaan why don't you have seventy billion subscribers? You cracked my up while delivering excellent information. Now I have even less interest in developing my own 2600 game than I had previously (which was exactly zero) :D

Thank goodness the TIA's successor, the CTIA chip (and then GTIA) on the Atari 400 and 800 automatically DMA'd the player-missile sprite data onto the screen for you and all that was needed was setting the horizontal position register for all of them (and their DMA base address).

this was a really fun video!!

Love your videos!

So im not supposed to assemble an nes entirely on a bread board

@jwhite5008

5 ай бұрын

Not unless you have all the chips, a few hundred wires, and angelic patience of wrangling the latter...

Ahhh.. the days before display memory buffering..... by the way, what happens to a CRT if you get the timings wrong? Does it do any physical damage?

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

I’m not sure, I was using an emulator the whole time due to not having an actual Atari 2600 or cartridge writer… I have one of those “Atari 2600 flashback” things that have a bunch of preloaded games on it somewhere in my basement though

@notbaldfrost

5 ай бұрын

if your number of lines is too far off or you set some of the related registers in the wrong order it fails to vsync so you usually get a distorted video output that "rolls" up or down that's about it

@GarryGri

2 ай бұрын

No.

yayyyyy new truttle1 vid dropped!!!

That coding nightmare is indicative of the processor's and RAM's massive limitations. Well, I'm glad I didn't have that console for long until I got my C64 in the early 1980s! Great insight.

The 2600 was basically just a pong machine that was accidentally capable of much more, since at first glance it barely seems capable of pong at all. The atari was also the first and last console to use this method of display, because this is insane and stupid.

@Mrshoujo

5 ай бұрын

If it's stupid & it works, it's not stupid.

@arlasoft

5 ай бұрын

Far from insane and stupid, it was a stroke of genius. The Channel F showed pretty much the maximum of what was possible in 1976/77 using the 'traditional' video RAM method while still being somewhat affordable, which was itself was ahead of its time with colour graphics three years before that became common place in the arcades. And that was still absolutely blown out of the water by the 2600. When games are designed specifically to take advantage of the 2600 hardware and avoid its limitations, it can do things that no other home machine could do until the Amiga arrived, and using far more colours.

@GarryGri

2 ай бұрын

It was like that to keep production cost to a minimum. (RAM for screen memory would add expense)

wooooo new truttle1 video! and about a 6502 based console?? amazing :))

Ive done some NES programming. I looked into the Atari when learning that, and never made anything for the system because its specs are a Nightmare. I'm impressed you got *anything* running on it, lol

Because some people like a challenge, or just want to prove a point, a homebrewer coded a much better Atari 2600 port of Pac-Man, using the same cart size limit. It still had visible flicker, but it was much more faithful to the arcade game. They apparently went on to make an even more improved port for the Supercharger.

Isn't there a game maker like program you can just use to make 2600 games???

10:09 why is it like this?

Truttle Doesn't understand how to use what Jay Miner designed with the TIA.

I seem to recall something about Atari programming known as racing the scanline, or something to that effect.

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

I've heard that term too. It makes sense since scanline timing is really important. Though I think the actual term is "racing the beam"

Good video. Lots of stuff covered here but I think you over did the effects a little.

whats with the flash dinosaurs ? so weird

Definitely showing my (advanced) age here; to me this video serves as a reminder that we had some pretty amazing games back then given the limitations the programmers had to deal with. Yeah, there were clunkers, but there was some darned fun gameplay in that era as well (Activision's games raised the bar, IIRC. We *ALL* wanted their games when they came out). If you haven't already, check out "GDC Classic Postmortem: Warren Robinett's Adventure" on YT. It's a fascinating lecture where Warren talks about some of the shortcuts and concessions he had to make in order to make Adventure happen.

i just opened the video and i have barely any idea of how the 2600 works but i do know it doesnt have a video chip or vram and thr cpu has to do graphics so i already think its hell

its honestly so sweet how obfuscate has gone from not wanting to make friends in fear of loosing them since he's immortal, to genuinely caring that creaturey accidentally insulted him.

Apparently the 6502 and some derivatives are still being made today by Western Design Center

Oof, ROM Hacking for me its a nightmare, not only its there limited support for very few games and its harder than creating a full game, but theres barely any support of ROM Hacking at all and everything's like outdated, had to make a very simple Super Mario World hack because of this.

Nice video. The "SLEEP #26" should actually be "SLEEP 26" @ 15:38

Interesting.. so that's why all major UI information seemed to default to the top right for a while. Of course, now there are better ways to display statistics.

@kazii_the_avali

5 ай бұрын

and yet i still see a few(mainly retro like) games default to the top right. i mean it is a nice place to put information.

@MerrowHawk

5 ай бұрын

Still makes sense that it's a holdover from hardware limitations.@@kazii_the_avali

This is apparently the channel’s 127th video according to your channel info

@Lixxide

3 ай бұрын

1111111

Dropped everything, Truttle1 video dropped...

there's better ways to move sprites on the x axis by using horizontal motion registers

"this is like one of the 3 things it can do" 🤣🤣

please release season 2 of slithers software

i had an atari developmwnt phase like 12 years ago lmao what a throwback. I developed a whole maze game in batari basic, its MUCH easier than assembler

As a game dev, this is terrifying

Where is the "sleep" opcode coming from

@Kevzz2srs

5 ай бұрын

it's a macro that inserts instructions that don't do anything for x amount of cycles

I remember trying to program for the Atari 2600 once. I failed miserably. Just... too much.

It's actually surprising we have any form of video games at all. I say this as a game dev. Just watching this makes me want to pull out my hair.

@GarryGri

2 ай бұрын

You should look at programming the Vectrex then. You have to move the actual CRT gun around manually, no scan lines at all!

E.T: is a quite good game on the Atari 2600! Dunno what you have. I loved it playing as kid with my friends.

Because the Atari 2600 had an MOS Technologies 6502 processor, if you programmed for the Atari 2600, then you'd require very little training to program in Machine Language for the Commodore 64! This was because the Commodore 64 also used the 6502 processor! Atari 2600 machine language and Commodore 64 machine language therefore shared many, if not all, mnemonics such as INC, INA, INX, INY, JMP, JSR, STA, STX, STY, and so on.

My heart breaks for the guy they rushed to make ET

what's the green camel

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

🐢?

Agreed

Every time I think the 2600 couldn't get worse, it gets worse.

Your video content is amazing, but the thrusting, heaving, constant exaggerated motion is slightly jarring. Could you maybe tone it down slightly, or maybe slow down the loops?

Fit a 6502 program into 4k. It's fun. But that was long, long ago.

hell yeah, 2600 asm! I was almooost gonna learn C, but I saw a udemy course on 6502 assembly for the 2600 specifically and I went "ooo, let's do that instead" :3

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

c is way usefuller though

@trannusaran6164

5 ай бұрын

@@Truttle1 surprisingly more cursed, tho. Would've expected assembly to be the height of the "cursed build system" mountain

WAH! ITS-A-ME! WALUIGI ON THE ATARI 2600! (unintelligible noise)

ive been doing this but with the NES :3

holy crap

I think I'll stick to NES and PC Engine assembly, haha

Man, if you're at the level of using delay loops and counting scanlines, you only a few steps away to just implementing the game on an FPGA and doing away with a CPU. It would probably look better too.

Think about how hard it was for the people who made the first games

Given the quality of games for the Atari 2600, if you had sold "Survive" for it back when it was still big, it probably would've become the best selling Atari game there ever was.

et bryan beyblade beer

How do you understand the 2600s logic

You know they make Atari 2600 games until about 1990. Here is a game from 1989- kzread.info/dash/bejne/hGut1I-NZtG4iqg.html

Now make this game in malbolge and see if that’s even any harder.

6:39 agreed, 480i is superior.

6507

Never knew 2600 is so painful 😅

Programming for the atari truly was nightmarish.

3:12

Malbolge before there was Malbolge

I'd take this over Unity any day of the week

People keep repeating this same wrong history about the NES. It wasn't even sold nationwide in the usa in 1985. Atari was still dominating the market, despite simple phrases like "crash" which are never actually quantified.

I think you mean extremely easy

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

Can I see your portfolio of 2600 games?

@arlasoft

5 ай бұрын

I wouldn't say easy, compared to say, Unity or Godot. But if you've programmed other 8-bit hardware, and providing you get your head around the concept of display kernals, it's not really harder - just different. The 8bitworkshop online IDE is absolutely fantastic for 2600 development as you can change one instruction and instantly see if that's had the desired effect or completely put your display kernal out of sync. I can see how if you were using a standalone assembler and waiting for that to assemble before sending it to Stella, that would be quite a bit more frustrating. Obviously for the programmers working in the 1970s and 80s it was extremely difficult, iteration times would be measured in minutes rather than milliseconds and they didn't have the benefit of 40+ years of accumulated knowledge that we have. They didn't know what the tricks were, they had to invent them.

#

Cute cartoons :)

Bruh, it's really not that difficult.

ten hundred billion likes on this comment and i will buy an original atari 2600 and play this game on it

@Truttle1

5 ай бұрын

first like!

@retroboi128thegamedev

5 ай бұрын

@@Truttle1 Second reply

@notbaldfrost

5 ай бұрын

i'll do it for free when i get home from work today

@notbaldfrost

5 ай бұрын

done lol kzread.info/dash/bejne/oHl7qM-hc9LHYrw.html

Why didn't you use batari basic? its way more easier. But i get if you wanted a challenge