Astrophotography - Basic Star Stacking

Ғылым және технология

I hope you enjoy!
Links to things mentioned into the video!
Deep Sky Stacker - deepskystacker.free.fr/english... (DeepSkyStacker 3.3.4)
GIMP - www.gimp.org/
XnConverter - www.xnview.com/en/xnconvert/#d...
T-Adaptor - www.amazon.com/Celestron-9362...
Ring Mount - www.amazon.com/Celestron-9341...
Timer - www.amazon.com/Neewer-Shutter...

Пікірлер: 55

  • @T5Zplayer
    @T5Zplayer4 жыл бұрын

    Top job. Most of the stacking/astro vids I have looked at are poorly thought out and make too many assumptions about the knowledge of the viewer. This is the right level and the way you talk it through is the best I have seen

  • @YTMegiddo
    @YTMegiddo6 жыл бұрын

    So far this has been the best explanation of Stacking I've even seem, thank you!

  • @juliotankt
    @juliotankt7 жыл бұрын

    do we need to align / shift the RGB to be overlapped in Deepsky stacker program after stacking? just left for next postprocessing ? since mention don't do further in DSS after stacking.

  • @johnhetherington2667
    @johnhetherington26674 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant Video, makes so many things clear and understandable. Thank you so much for sharing.

  • @raytbrown2
    @raytbrown25 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for explaining bias shot. I didn't know the science behind that part and why it was different from a dark.

  • @psychojock
    @psychojock6 жыл бұрын

    Hi i have bought the star adventurer can you tell me the make of tripod you are using Many thanks

  • @OutThereIam
    @OutThereIam5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for your effort. it's a long video but it is very useful, important tips.

  • @tonysastrojourney4175
    @tonysastrojourney41756 жыл бұрын

    Hi Tom, I have no luck stacking in DSS. For some reason, my image in DSS is a long, vertical rectangle that looks pretty bad. First of all, how do I get my image to look normal? Is there a setting in DSS that allows you to adjust the size of the image? Thanks

  • @michieldrost9396
    @michieldrost93966 жыл бұрын

    Does your Mak have a threading around the eyepiece holder? You could get an adapter for your camera body that threads directly to your telescope without the sloppy 1,25 inch piece. At least, this is the case for my Mak. I can attach my Canon to it directly without any slop.

  • @zhyfn9773
    @zhyfn97736 жыл бұрын

    I heard you were saying exposure of 15-20 seconds. Did you track using your mount while shoot a picture? I read somewhere that the maximum exposure time is estimated 500/focal length before one can see star trails in the pictures, which is about 0.4sec using your focal length.

  • @cosmoscarl4332
    @cosmoscarl43324 жыл бұрын

    Primary noise with DSLR’s is what’s called color mottle. That’s why it’s important to dither several exposures of the same target or you multiply the color mottle noise in the photos. Dithering is moving the camera two to three visible star diameters each frame, around the center of your target. Then when you stack them, color mottle from the Bayer matrix doesn’t multiply.

  • @douglasholt9337
    @douglasholt93375 жыл бұрын

    Ya got my attttition. Best explanation yet. I am from the future, mid 2019. Just got a new camera after being outta it for 10 years. I am into wide field photography. Same probs. Sharpening has always been a bug-a-boo. Gotta be a better way???

  • @zLobsterRus
    @zLobsterRus5 жыл бұрын

    35:00 Don't die on me, dude! Somebody hit his back! Also nice tutorial! Helped me in many ways.

  • @BackyardAstronomy2018
    @BackyardAstronomy20186 жыл бұрын

    The interval is different on some brands. So some of them you can set the shutter to just say 30sec then the interval time to 5sec. Depends on the brand. But really good video

  • @richardvernon7019
    @richardvernon70195 жыл бұрын

    very helpful, thanks for making it....

  • @uyt384
    @uyt3847 жыл бұрын

    It looks like Deep Sky Stacker is a lot fancier than the stacking program I used to use (Registar) when I was doing astroimaging some years ago. I definitely never tried to shoot DSOs at f 12.7 and 1300mm focal length. I often used 100mm-200mm, at f/2.8 if possible, with 5-10 minute subexposures and narrowband H-alpha filters to combat light pollution.

  • @Sharpless2

    @Sharpless2

    6 жыл бұрын

    Registax is not made for Deepsky. Its for planets, and thats it.

  • @alenk738

    @alenk738

    5 жыл бұрын

    Registar, not Registax. Google it.

  • @jeffslade1892
    @jeffslade18924 жыл бұрын

    Use a T2 to adapter for a more secure mount. For M4/3 we want a short length adapter, not the normal SLR mirror box adaptor, they are too long for the back focus, get an eyepiece to M4/3 and discard the sliding tube revealing the T2 thread, screw that on to the telescope. Other mirrorless cameras will also want a short adaptor.

  • @tjunkieu2b
    @tjunkieu2b4 жыл бұрын

    at around 46min - "curves" is in a way superset of "levels" whatever is done in levels can be done in curves, you don't really need to use both. Just use curves move the left point a bit to the right - to darken overall, then you can play w. the mid-curve to do something very similar to gain. regardless, very helpful video

  • @aryanparekh9314
    @aryanparekh93144 жыл бұрын

    liked and subscribed, this video is really helpful

  • @patrickkavanaghlomas9653
    @patrickkavanaghlomas96535 жыл бұрын

    I tried to use Deep Sky Stacker for Mars last night. Thanks to this video, it was an easy chore. However, I haven't started to do the processing yet with the GIMP software. Thanks for all the tips. Was/is Deep Sky Stacker appropriate for Planetary stacking?

  • @Mr77pro

    @Mr77pro

    4 жыл бұрын

    Definitely not for planetary. You need registax or autostackert for planetary.

  • @DanT10
    @DanT106 жыл бұрын

    Is 3.3.4 still the best choice?

  • @davew1234
    @davew12345 жыл бұрын

    Great video 👍

  • @rheahleihel
    @rheahleihel5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the tutorial !

  • @frl8031
    @frl80316 жыл бұрын

    wonderful, thanks!

  • @Pomdaddy
    @Pomdaddy6 жыл бұрын

    Deepskystacker is for Windows what about Mac?

  • @Gally80
    @Gally805 жыл бұрын

    Great advice thank you

  • @Actuastrometeo
    @Actuastrometeo6 жыл бұрын

    Good views

  • @GalaxyArtMedia
    @GalaxyArtMedia5 жыл бұрын

    Nice tutorial

  • @brfisher1123
    @brfisher11237 жыл бұрын

    Did you take that wonderful picture of that galaxy at the beginning of the video or did you get it from someone else?

  • @onerevolution8064
    @onerevolution80644 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for the video..

  • @azizghanim
    @azizghanim5 жыл бұрын

    Much appreciated.

  • @ChrisLX200
    @ChrisLX2007 жыл бұрын

    This is a slippery slope Tom - you think a gamma ray spectroscope was expensive? If the astrophotography bug bites you'll be in real trouble. Ask me how I know :-)

  • @mikeries8549
    @mikeries85494 жыл бұрын

    Retitled to "an hour of random astrophotography tips" but I meant to focus on stacking. See: Yertle the Turtle

  • @SidneyPratt
    @SidneyPratt4 жыл бұрын

    Learned a lot thanks.I

  • @aepceo1
    @aepceo17 жыл бұрын

    It should be noted that most telescopes beyond the beginner's series use 2", not 1.25".

  • @Sharpless2

    @Sharpless2

    6 жыл бұрын

    and then theres that free 1.25" adapter that comes with every scope....

  • @Mr77pro

    @Mr77pro

    4 жыл бұрын

    It depends on the size of the sensor in the camera. 1.25" works up to approx. 4/3" size (22mm diagonal) aps-c and up definitely require 2". I think you were prob referring to .965"....cheap department store scopes.

  • @wirelessdj
    @wirelessdj7 жыл бұрын

    Welcome back

  • @valentinotera3244
    @valentinotera32443 жыл бұрын

    MANNEYY

  • @cosmoscarl4332
    @cosmoscarl43324 жыл бұрын

    Photoshop’s algorithms are so good now that you don’t even need dark, flat and bias frames. All that noise can be eliminated in post processing.

  • @Mr77pro

    @Mr77pro

    4 жыл бұрын

    Not true!! The only flaw photoshop can tackle is vignetting, and it still doesn't do as good as a decent set of flats. There's no shortcuts in this endeavor.

  • @cosmoscarl4332
    @cosmoscarl43324 жыл бұрын

    Just so you know, DSLRS don’t use CCD’s. There’s a big difference. Most CCD’s are mono and you use filters with them. DSLR’s use sensors with a Bayer matrix over it. Red, green and blue mini filters over the pixels. Also,CCD’s have regulated cooling. DSLR’s do not. Watch Tony Hallas. He explains it better.

  • @wirelessdj
    @wirelessdj7 жыл бұрын

    Why not just get a Nikon P900 and be done with it?

  • @Anti-proton

    @Anti-proton

    7 жыл бұрын

    That camera doesn't connect to a telescope, so it is forever limited to it's single lens. There are so many amazing lenses to chose from with DSLR's.

  • @aepceo1

    @aepceo1

    7 жыл бұрын

    Why not get a real astro-camera? They aren't that expensive these days.

  • @christownsend9622

    @christownsend9622

    7 жыл бұрын

    The WirelessDJ P900

  • @3DWHIZZ

    @3DWHIZZ

    6 жыл бұрын

    one word: NOISE

  • @shambooki4224

    @shambooki4224

    5 жыл бұрын

    Aperture

  • @jeffslade1892
    @jeffslade18924 жыл бұрын

    Good stuff but the first 24 minutes are wasted fiddling with a camera. Stacking is the actually useful info.

  • @jrs80920
    @jrs809206 жыл бұрын

    Jewish astrophotography...

  • @Sharpless2

    @Sharpless2

    6 жыл бұрын

    ?... dafuq?

Келесі