Matua ,, the fact that the brittish broke the trust encased in the queens recognition of the treaty should mean that any law of new zealand parliament enacted under those treaty obligations are null and void because they were not recognising the provisions of article and directives of the queen to set up their own colonial style of governance,,,,they broke faith with the queen and maori once the consent of the people was written even though the original purpose was for maori was to self govern and the crown would lookafter the settlers

Have you even read the Preamble in the Te Tiriti O waitanga or the English Draft of the 4th of February

If the Maori chiefs were so particular about their land they would not have signed the treaty or sold their land afterwards!

A bit better than the other ones. The point that the “real estate clause” means land cannot be owned by white settlers or organisations doesn’t really come through strongly enough. Tino Rangatiratanga is Māori government of everyone and everything - including settlers! - that’s why Te Rauparaha was completely within his treaty rights to summarily execute Arthur Wakefield & co. The “relationship” in the preface does not permit anywhere near three million white settlers - nor an English-language education system. That’s the real challenge for the TEU : as. You put it - facilitating ngahere then getting rid of the gorse.

So what are you two saying? What do you think should happen in todays modern world