Turn on the subtitle

@ugurugur8737

2 жыл бұрын

Alt Yazı Daima açık takip ediliyorsunuz başarılar dilerim

@swisscakir7671

2 жыл бұрын

Zaraku Raku my Sister wunderful Melaykum 🤲🏽🌿

@ZarakuRaku

2 жыл бұрын

@@ugurugur8737 Amin ya rabbal alamiin🤲🏻 thank you

@ZarakuRaku

2 жыл бұрын

@@swisscakir7671 thank u

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

Mongols are not Turkish people. But your picture choose is poor. Turk is almost in Europe Mongols are East Asians. Go more to west more mixed with Europians, now days Yakut, Buryat, Tuva mixed with Russians too. Inner Mongolians mixed with Chinese, they had forced marriage.

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

@mongolialegend8928

8 ай бұрын

Тэнэг хувийн төрүүлсэн эх чинь далд ороосой чамтай хамт

@Tarihmerkezi81

4 ай бұрын

sen de türk düşmanısın moğollar ile türkler ayni babanın iki farkli cocugudur kandaş ve kardestir sen isine bak

@Shadesarecool

3 ай бұрын

the language between turk and mongolian is similar

@EchoVortex713

3 ай бұрын

Kazakhs more mixed than Butyat, Kalmyk or Tuvan

I’m Mongolian from Sartuul tribe(Turk) I know that Mongols and Turks are blood brothers 💪🏻🇲🇳🇹🇲🇹🇷🇰🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬🇦🇿

@cengizhhhhhhhhhhkeskin6084

2 жыл бұрын

Hello from Turkiye 🙏

@cengizhhhhhhhhhhkeskin6084

2 жыл бұрын

@Arif Kazaklar Moğol kirmasidir. Bu sorun da değildir.

@retro12391

2 жыл бұрын

@Arif no we are not mongols

@retro12391

2 жыл бұрын

Mongols are not turk

@CM-dd1jm

2 жыл бұрын

@@retro12391 u are not Turk

Türkler ve mongolar kardeştir 🇹🇷❤🇲🇳

we Yakuts are, of course, Turks, but anthropologically we belong to the Central Asian race (Angara-Lena type), which also includes Buryat-Mongols and Mongols. Also, the Yakuts are very close to the Mongols genetically, the peoples closest to the Yakuts are the Tuvans, Tuvans-Todzhans, Tofalars, Buryat-Mongols, Mongols, Kalmyks. The Yakut language consists of 30% Mongolian words, which is a lot, of the Turkic peoples, only Tuvans have the most in the vocabulary of Mongolian words, this is 33%, we have 30% of the Yakuts, we have close cultural and family ties with the Mongols, they are our neighbors , as well as the Manchu peoples! The latest archaeological research on the territory of Yakutia proves that the ancestors of the Sakha people (Yakuts) were the Xiongnu and Xianbi tribes, the latter are proto-Mongols.

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

Yakut -40% european genetics

@azizyigido

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mx3mm7rv9f 40%european?hahahahaha🤣Sakha(yakuts)dna results 90%Mongoloid(Siberian+east asian and amerindian)origin,5%Baltic(ancient siberian)origin

@azizyigido

2 жыл бұрын

Sakha are 90%N Haplogroup,like Nenets,finnish and uralic,not mongols,mongols is C Tungusic origin

@makssakha8092

2 жыл бұрын

@@azizyigido yes, the Yakuts have the main haplogroup N, but you must understand that the Asian and Finno-Ugric N have differences in mutations, for your information, the Mongols also have a haplogroup N, but it is less than C, but they have it and here are the mutations they are the same as the Yakut, the Yakut genome also has a halpogroup C and it is considered directly obtained from the Mongols, and not through third nations! recent studies of geneticists indicate that the peoples closest to the Yakuts are Mongols, Buryat-Mongols, Tuvans, Tofalars, Tuvans-Todzhans! but not Finns and not Estonians, their haplogroup N mutated behind the Ural mountains 3000 years ago and is not related to the Yakut N, the Yakut N, formed in the Baikal region and remained there, merging into the composition of the Mongols and Turks who lived there !

@user-rn6nb2ey7e

2 жыл бұрын

1. The haplogroup C directly came from CT. 2. The haplogroup O and N originally came from K2a. Haplogroup N, a lineage that is thought to have originated in China some 35,000 years ago 3. mongolian have over 60-70% haplogroup C. 4.Mongolians have nothing to do with Haplogroup N . 5.Your C brothers still have been living in Australia and Southeast Asia as Aborigines Haplogroup C is another extremely old lineage that left Africa approximately 60,000 years ago and spread over most of Eurasia. Two subclades of C are found in Japan: C1a1 and C2a. The first group to separate was C1, which colonized the Middle East and South Asia. One branch (C1a ) may have moved north to Central Asia and then split in two: One tribe moved to Europe (haplogroup C1a2,C1a2 is now nearly extinct in Europe.), while the other migrated to East Asia and survives today only in Japan (C1a1/Ainu and Jomon people). C1a1a1/Japan,Korea C1a1a2 /China (Liaoning) Haplogroup C2a, representing also 3% of the population, is typically found among the Mongols and Siberians. It might have come with the Ainu through Sakhalin island and Hokkaido, or along with the Yayoi farmers from Korea. The second branch of C1 spread into South Asia, Southwest Asia, and Central Asia, where it is found today at low frequencies (C1b1a1). During this time, other C strains continued their eastward migration into Southeast Asia, where they split into four main regional clusters: The first branch colonized Indonesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (C1b2a). A second branch went south to Australia, where they became the Aborigines (C1b2b). Another settled in the highlands of New Guinea (haplogroup C-P55).C1b1a2/Hoabinhian/Viet The fourth branch went as far as Northeast Asia (haplogroup C-M217) and is now widespread mainly among the Mongols (Kalmyks, Buryats, and Oirats), the Turkic peoples of Central Asia (Kazakhs, Karakalpaks, Uzbeks, Dolgans), and the East Siberian tribes (Chukchi, Itelmen, Nivks, Tungus). Furthermore, it is also common in moderate amounts among Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans, but also among several indigenous peoples of North America, including some Na-Dené, Algonquian or Siouan-speaking populations.

Tuva Buryat Yakut Hazaar etc we are one BIG FAMILY THE GREAT MONGOL 🇲🇳🇲🇳🇲🇳

@user-hr9jy8ru1g

2 жыл бұрын

Hahaha lol. Tuva Yakut Hazara are Turkic not Mongols

@nevsehri4819

2 жыл бұрын

Tuva and Yakut are Turkic

@tanhukim9963

2 жыл бұрын

Yakut Tuva not Mongol. Hazaras= Turkic and Mongol mix.

@CM-dd1jm

2 жыл бұрын

@@tanhukim9963 dont cry little boy

@tanhukim9963

2 жыл бұрын

@@CM-dd1jm kes be bücür. 2 de bi yazma.

Korean, Mongolian, Manchu and Siberian all are related closely

@ahmadsufian9899

Жыл бұрын

What about Malaysian?

@hayabusa1329

Жыл бұрын

@@ahmadsufian9899 Malaysian are southeast asians

Turkey Turkish peoples, Azerbaijani Turks, Turkmens and uzbeks very similar.

Turkic,Tungusic,Mongols and Native american are same blood,from Ancient Siberian Altaic

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

@aktayturan9272

2 жыл бұрын

I'm Turkish and look to my MyHeritage results. I have also match with Mesoamerican Andeans DNA.

@user-y371

2 жыл бұрын

@@aktayturan9272 O mezoamerican değil. Aslında Amerikan yerlileri Sibiryadan ve orta Asyadan Amerikan kıtasına göçtüler genler aynı genler.

@aktayturan9272

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-y371 Haklısın kardeşim ama aması var. Mesoamerican Andeanlar 20.000 yıl önce Amerikaya göçtüler və son İnuit yada Kızılderililer 11.000 yıl önce. Bende Paleo Siberian genleri var ama yeni Sibirya genleri değil. Bazı Japonlarda tek Mesoamerican çıkıyor benim gibi. Türkler Moğol değiller ve İnuit çok Moğolarda çıkıyor.

@yenidenturktarihtezi

2 жыл бұрын

Nice theory

mongols are completely different looking than chinese u should travel there and you will see

Mongolians and Tungusic including buryats, Sakha, and Manchus look more East Asians. Turks like Uyghurs, Uzbek, Kyrgyz have bigger eyes and lighter colour hair.

Salam Aleikum🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬 Kyrgyzstan😍

@erdogankarabas5646

2 жыл бұрын

Aleyküm selam kardeşim Türkiye dende size selam olsun yaşasın Türk birliği yaşasın Turan 🇹🇷🇰🇬🇦🇿🇰🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🤘🤘🤘🤘

@ZarakuRaku

2 жыл бұрын

Aleykum salam

@suryadidjasman319

2 жыл бұрын

Alaikumussalam from Indonesia.

I am from afghanistan and we are hazara people living in pakistan and iran and all world countries like australia we are from turk and mongol tribes but all the people of iran and afghanistan said we are mongol from changez khan tribes

Be strong like turk.

@Tarihmerkezi81

4 ай бұрын

NE MUTLU TÜRKÜM DIYENE !! Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

@Tarihmerkezi81

4 ай бұрын

🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿

Biz Türkler cok asil ve cok güzeliz

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

@shohruhmahmudov557

2 жыл бұрын

Kardashim. uzbekistandan salom.

Mongols are different from the Chinese. They look Asian but they are not like Chinese. Mongols are generally bigger, stockier, and generally taller and their faces are more diverse compared to Han Chinese. Your data point was not very inclusive about Mongols. Turks and Mongols are different ethnics but they are related and have similar mythology about their roorts.

@barguttobed

2 жыл бұрын

Yes😂 she is Indonesian they are even closer to chineses than Mongolians

@user-mm9bv3bl1u

2 жыл бұрын

The Han Chinese are short in stature and their faces are dark yellow, very similar to the Vietnamese people, but many of them mixed with the Manchu, Jurchen and Khitan, tribes close to the Mongols

@tugrul8335

2 жыл бұрын

@@barguttobed yes!

@user-wy8fe2lu1m

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mm9bv3bl1u 我是黑龙江人，中国北方人长得像蒙古人和朝鲜人，南方人长得像越南人或印尼人，差异非常大，但是我们的身份证上都是写着汉族人，很多中国北方人不知道自己有突厥或者契丹女真血统，而且南方人和北方人互相仇视，性格和文化很多都不一样

@artandcraftexporterCHINA

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-wy8fe2lu1m yes

Turks and Mongols, we are the children of the steppe, the law of the steppe. The Law: Unity, Equality, Fraternity. Scythians, Huns, Gokturks and later Gengis Khan shared the same ideologies. Of course, the Shamanist-Tengrist religion was the most important factor. It was primarily a struggle between the ever-expanding Chinese and the nomads.

@user-rn6nb2ey7e

2 жыл бұрын

Haplogroup O-M175 Chinese Korean Japanese Haplogroup N-M231 Yakut，Nenets people，Nganasan people Haplogroup C-M217 Mongolian Kazakhs Manchu Northern Tungusic N+C Southern Tungusic N+O The anccestor of these two haplogroups is called ( NO) and NO haplogroup turned into two branches that are N (Finno-ugric) and O (japonic-chinese-korean and….) so these two haplogroup have common anccestor few thousands years ago. The proto-Turks were East Asians/Siberians and of the Mongoloid race，whereas the Turkified Anatolian probably spews panTurk propaganda on a daily basis！What an absolute joke of a society! Turkey think they have many fathers, like Japanese, Korean , Mongolian and now even Kazakhs. According to Cinnioğlu et al. (2004),[6] there are many Y-DNA haplogroups present in Turkey. Most haplogroups in Turkey are shared with their West Asian and Caucasian neighbours. The most common haplogroup in Turkey is J2 (24%), which is widespread among the Mediterranean, Caucasian and West Asian populations. Haplogroups that are common in Europe (R1b and I - 20%), South Asia (L, R2, H - 5.7%) and Africa (A, E3*, E3a - 1%) are also present. By contrast, Central Asian haplogroups are rarer (C, Q N and O). look at Turkish for example, the Turkish are mostly Armenian, Arabs, Kurdish and Bulgarian converts, the Haplogroup J is overwhelmingly dominant in the Turkish population, the J came from native Anatolians and Arabs!

@user-rn6nb2ey7e

2 жыл бұрын

The main sources of Turkish descent are Middle Eastern and European，not Turkic people/Xiongnu The most common haplogroup in Turkey is J2 The Hittites, Ydna-J2 your brother-Arab Ydna-J1

@TheAnatoli66

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e What do you want to prove with the DNA samples? Can you please do the same with Chinese dates? So y-R1a is Indo-Aryan, y-N Finno-Ugric, y-C is North Eurasian, y-Q is Ket-Na Dene-Amerindian. So there is no Turkish DNA. So Turkish speakers are aliens, right?! If there were no ancient Chinese sources, some would deny the existence of the Turks altogether. It is not the Turks and Mongolians who make propaganda with DNA models and numbers, but the Russians and the Chinese. Both powers have an egocentric view of the world and try by all means to interpret the scientific data according to their own interests. Turkey Turks know exactly where they originally come from. A Uyghur from Xinjiang has much more in common with a Turk genetically and linguistically than a northern Chinese has with a southern Chinese.

@TheAnatoli66

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e No, not really, not quite right. Turks were a mixed race from the start. Later they also mixed with the native Antolians in Anatolia. Turks have never killed people with short or long noses. Please look at the DNA examples of Uyghurs and Turkey Turks. There are 1000 years of migration history and thousands of kilometers in between. The resemblance is amazing. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iY6Xx5ScnbGpeqw.html

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

Turkish are not Turkics but converts . Turksih have 90% mixed genetics ,firts name of their state is Roman Sultanate ,because they were converted mixture of roman slaves .Even during the Ottoman Empire thry were not calling them Turkish it was forbidden.

Based on what was mentioned about the kinship of languages, basic words play a significant role in this context. Since Altaic languages share very little basic vocabulary compared to other language families, doubts about the relatedness of Turkic and Mongolian languages have increased. We can speak more confidently about the linguistic relations between Turkic and Mongolian. The existence of Mongolian words in most Turkish languages and the existence of many Turkish words in the Mongolian language proves this claim. Also, a certain amount of shared vocabulary does not always indicate that two languages are part of the same language family. It is estimated that more than 60% of Persian words come from Arabic, but this is due to historical admixture, not because they are in the same family. Linguists such as Sergerard Clawson, Gerhard Dorfer, Alexander Mikhaylovich Serbak are serious opponents of the theory of Altaic languages. They believe that the Turkish and Mongolian languages are not from the same family, but in the past, due to the geographical proximity and also the close relations between Turks and Mongols in certain historical periods, common words have emerged between these two languages. which is often the result of Turkish influence on Mongolian. One of the important reasons for this group of linguists is the absence of common basic words in both Turkish and Mongolian languages. In addition to pointing out the inconsistency of the basic vocabulary in these two languages, Gerard Clawson evaluates the lexical similarities as a result of contact in three different periods between these two languages. The first entry of Turkish words into Mongolian took place in the 5th and 6th centuries AD by the Turkic language Tabghaji (Taugach). The second wave is the entry of Turkish words into the Mongolian language in the 8th and 12th centuries AD and the third wave is the campaign of the Mongols to different regions with a large number of Turks in the Mongol army in the late 12th and 13th centuries AD. Today, in the West, the theory of Altaic languages does not have strong followers like in the first half of the 20th century, and many linguists doubt the nature of this theory. The only way to know where the commonalities come from is to look back. In 2011, Asia Perletzweig, another modern linguist who has spent some time studying these languages, found by examining older texts that the Turkic and Mongolian languages were less similar centuries ago than they are now. This is exactly the opposite of what would be expected if the two languages had a common ancestor, indicating that their commonalities arose from language contact. In the end, it should be mentioned that considering the comparison of the two words Turkish and Mongolian, it can be said that Turkish and Mongolian are two different languages, and even with increasing research, it is clear that Turkish does not belong to the family. of the hypothetical Altaic languages, and this linguistic classification is much more inconsistent than that of other language families. The presence of words and even their percentage does not determine the language family. Because in this case, today the three languages Turkish, Arabic and Persian must belong to the family of Semitic languages, which we know is not the case. In any case, nowadays, for the correct etymology of words, the best way to distinguish Turkish from Mongolian is to be familiar with these languages and study the historical course of both languages. It will also be useful to review the works written in the field of ethnology and etymology of Turkish and Mongolian languages in prestigious European and American universities.

2. Proto-Turkic: Its homeland and historical background The Turkic peoples are known to be traditionally nomadic or semi-nomadic pasto ralists, which can be confirmed by various written sources from at least the second half of the first millennium AD onwards (for example, a herding lifestyle including horse riding is reflected in Old Turkic runic texts, such as the 8th-century Kul Tigin inscription from the Orkhon river valley in Mongolia). For those Turkic speaking peoples that were described as agriculturalists rather than pastoralists in the past few centuries, such as the Chuvash in the Volga Basin, a relatively recent shift from nomadism to sedentarism has been attested.' The majority of traditional 1.Turkic societies practiced agriculture only as a secondary activity. Needless to say, one cannot automatically extrapolate such a situation to the Proto-Turkic period. However, one can provide some insights into the issue by integrating linguistic data with historical and archaeological evidence. To do so, it is first necessary to outline the contemporary views of the Proto-Turkic homeland and the probable historical affiliation of the Proto-Turkic speech community. It is generally agreed among historians and linguists that the starting point of the Turkic migrations was located in the eastern part of the Central Asian steppe (see, e.g., Golden 1992; Kljaštornyj & Sultanov 2009; Menges 1995:55). Turkologists use various definitions for describing the Proto-Turkic homeland, but most indicate more or less the same region. While Janhunen (1996: 26, 2015:293) locates the Proto-Turkic homeland fairly precisely in Eastern Mongolia, Róna-Tas (1998:88), in a rather general manner, places the last habitat of the Turkic speakers before the disintegration of the family "in West and Central Siberia and in the region south of it." The latter localization overlaps in large part with that proposed by Tenišev et al. (2006), who associate the Proto-Turkic urheimat with the vast area stretching from the Ordos Desert in Inner Mongolia to the foothills of the Sayan-Altai Mountains in Southern Siberia. Such a vague localization seems to be quite compatible with the association of at least late Proto-Turkic speakers with nomadic herders. From a historical linguistic viewpoint, the region under discussion appears to be the most probable habitat for a language that is assumed to have been in contact with Old Chinese, Old East Iranian and possibly Tocharian (and, according to some scholars (see Dybo 2007), at the same time reaching the languages far to the north-west, such as Proto-Yeniseian, Proto-Samoyedic and Proto-Ugric). An attempt at verifying the homeland by examining archaeological and paleobotanical evidence, as well as the Proto-Turkic roots referring to natural environment, has also been made (Tenišev et al. 2006). A few noteworthy proposals on the depth of Proto-Turkic, i.e., the time of its primal split into the Bulgar and Common Turkic branches, vary from the 5th century BC (Róna-Tas 1998, based on contact linguistics) to the period between 120 BC and the beginning of the first millennium AD (Mudrak 2009, based on glottochronological analysis of Turkic morphology and historical phonology) to the period between the 1st century BC and the 1st century AD (Dybo 2007, based on contact linguistics and lexicostatistics). The proposals regarding the Proto-Turkic homeland can be seen in the context of the possible Proto-Turkic affiliation with the Xiongnu, a nomadic group that lived north and northwest of China in the first centuries before and after the common era. Several dozen words used by the Xiongnu were recorded in Old Chinese texts such as Shiji (or the Records of the Grand Historian) and the Book of Han, and based on these few words, contemporary scholars have speculated on what language the Xiongnu may have spoken. Various hypotheses were put forward during the 20th century, yet the assumption that the Xiongnu, or at least some of them, were affili ated with Turkic-speaking groups has gained the widest acceptance among scholars (Ramstedt 1922; Basin 1948; Gabain 1949; Šervašidze 1986). This affiliation is based on direct linguistic evidence, i.e., comparing the Xiongnu words in Old Chinese texts with Proto-Turkic, supplemented by historical data that connects the Xiongnu and the subsequent Turkic peoples. Recently, the most reliable Xiongnu words that are comparable with reconstructed Proto-Turkic stems have been outlined by Dybo (2007). Janhunen (2015) also recognizes this affiliation. In short, although we can never exclude that the Xiongnu were a multi-ethnic confederation, it is very likely that their core was Turkic-speaking.2 Different historical and archaeological sources give clues about the subsistence patterns of the Xiongnu. Old Chinese histories (including Shiji) emphasize that the Xiongnu were nomadic pastoralists that bred different kinds of domestic ungulates, namely horses, cattle, sheep and camels (Watson 1961). On the other hand, there are multiple indications in Chinese chronicles (including Shiji, Hou Hanshu (or the Book of the Later Han) and notes on the Han annals by Yen Shi-ku) that the Xiongnu were familiar with agriculture, including millet farming (Bičurin 1950; Davydova & Šilov 1953; Davydova 1985). The written sources, however, do not indicate clearly whether it was the Xiongnu themselves or their Chinese captives who were involved in agricultural activities. From an archaeological perspective, although there is about 1000 years of nomadic life in Mongolia beforehand, the Xiongnu period is the first time we have any evidence of agriculture in the region. Agricultural tools and millet grains dating to this period have been found, as well as some isotopic evidence for millet consumption (William Taylor, p.c., Jena, May 2017). It is commonly agreed that the Xiongnu economy was based on pastoralism and had an agricultural component. However, the question of how important the latter was remains open (see Wright et al. 2009; Kradin & Kang 2011; Machicek 2011; Spengler et al. 2016 for further discussion). Given all these observations, it is interesting to examine whether historical linguistic analysis of Turkic subsistence terms can support the association of Proto-Turkic with the Xiongnu. 2. Dybo (2007) shows that the Turkic affiliation is valid, first of all, for the late Xiongnu, while some early "Xiongnu" words may have belonged to an Eastern Iranian (Khotan Saka?) language. There is also a hypothesis by Pulleyblank (1962), which was supported by Vovin (2000, 2002), that the Xiongnu were a Yeniseian-speaking people. An agnostic view of the linguistic affiliation of the Xiongnu is presented in Doerfer (1973). 3. Pastoralist vocabulary in Proto-Turkic Below I list some of the most relevant Turkic pastoralist terms. To give a more de tailed picture, I distinguish between Proto-Turkic and Common Turkic levels. The former label is used when a root occurs in both major subdivisions of the family: the "Standard" Turkic languages, like Turkish, Uyghur, Kazakh etc., and the very specific Bulgar branch, which is represented by its only living language, Chuvash, as well as rather poor lexical data from the extinct Bulgar dialects preserved mainly as loanwords in Hungarian. The label "Common Turkic" means that the word is not attested in Bulgar and hence should be technically attributed to the time after the split of Proto-Turkic. However, due to scarcity of evidence from the Bulgar branch, it is common practice in the field to equate such roots with the Proto-Turkic ones unless a source of borrowing into Turkic has been established. Robbeets, M. and Savelyev, A., n.d. Language Dispersal Beyond Farming. pp.136,137, 138.

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

@freddo_cappuccino Turkic tribes of Mongolia

This girl is a robot no words just looking the screen

“Proto-Altaic” language=Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic+Uralic +Koreanic+Japonic The most frequent paternal haplogroup in “Proto-Altaic” was “K” K is thought to originate from the Central Asia or South Asia.K=K2a+K2b Haplogroup N and O originated from Haplogroup K2a Haplogroup R1 and Q originated from Haplogroup K2b/P The origin of Mongoloid (East-Eurasian) populations： The first settlers C1C2+D1 The second group of settlers Q+R1a The third group of settlers N1a+O2a Martine Robbeets suggests that the Turkic peoples were descended from a Transeurasian agricultural community based in northeast China, which is to be associated with the Xinglongwa culture（Y-DNA: N1a） and the succeeding Hongshan culture（Y-DNA: N1a O2a C2b） K2a/NO is roughly the ancient North Asian-East Asian gene. It is believed to have originated in Indochina or southern China The O-M175 haplogroup origin were Yunnan-Burma border. It has two primary branches: O1 and O2 O1b2 moved to Korea and Japan O2 entered East Asia with the western route (Himalayan-Yunnan). And became to Sino-Tibetan Tibetan=33.9% O2+（51.6% D1 + 2.6% C2） 1，O2→Tibet/Qiang tribes/Tibeto-Burman/ydna D+C→Tibetan D has its highest diversity within Tibeto-Burmese groups 2，O2→North China, Manchuria/ydna C2→Northern Han Chinese/ Liao River/north East Asia (O2a+C2) Origin of Koreans: Liao River/north East Asia (O2a+C2) + Korean peninsula natives (O1b2) Modern Koreans have O2(45%, Dongyi migrants from the north), O1b2(35% ~ 40%, natives), C(15%, migrants from the north). During the Yayoi period, haplogroup O1b2+O2a started to arrive and spreaded to every region of Japan. Origin of Japanese: Jomon (D1a2+C1a1) + Korean peninsula /Yayoi (O2a+O1b2). Haplogroups C and D represents an extremely ancient lineage of modern humans in East Asia C1a+D1a2→Hokkaido，Sakhalin→Ainu people and Japanese（Jomon people） C1b+D1a1→ Pacific Islands→Polynesia Melanesia Australian Aborigines Proto-Mongolian and Tungusic may have originally been C2b, inhabiting modern Mongolia and northeast China An point made by academic is that Y-Haplogroup C2 is original Haplogroup of Northeast Asia which get replaced by Y-Haplogroup N1a O2a from Southern China. N1+O2→Manchuria C2/C1a1→Liao River Civilization N1+O2→Mongolia，Manchuria C2b→Mongolian+Tungusic people The N-M231 haplogroup became West-Liaohe agricultural people-Proto-Altaic，Northern Asian groups-Uralic+Yakut ，Eurasian steppe nomads-Turkic The N hg has appeared various times in Eurasian history: Xinglongwa culture> major Y-DNA: N The ancient Finn-Uralians perhaps may represent the first wave of migrants from the east long ago (maybe 5-12kya). The Finnish-Uralic are the result of the mixture of I (old populations of Europe) and N (Uralic) Southern china N1→N1a+N1b N1a→Siberia/replace Q1→ Eastern Europe/Northern Europe=Tatars N+R1a (R-M458)，Finnish N+I，some Slavs R1a (R-M458) I2+N：Latvians，Estonians，Baltic haplogroup K2b/P split off somewhere around the nexus of China, the Altai mountains, and Siberia. Broadly speaking Q migrated east across the bering bridge into the Americas, and R1a migrated west into what is now Iran India and Eastern Europe. Native American/ancient siberian/Xiongnu/ gene Q+R1a 1，Central Asia Q,R1a→Mongolia→Xiongnu 2，Mongolia C2b+QR→ Bering Strait→ North America→ Native American Y DNA tests show that haplogroups Q1 and C2b are believed to be indigenous to the Americas. (R1a haplotypes may also have been brought to the Americas by the proto-Native American migrants but are more disputed since they exist elsewhere). 3，South China N1a O2a→Mongolia→Proto-Altaic/The Liao River Civilization（Xinglongwa+Hongshan） Mongolian= 1，53.8％C2b 2，K2a（10.8％O2+10.8％N1） 3，4.6%P* (xQ,R)+9.2%R1a Kazakh 1，50.85%C2b+0.46%D 2，K2a（10.82%O2a+5.33%N1a） 3，K2b（12.13%R+3.17%Q） 4，8.19%J, 4.95%G, 1.78%E Kyrgyz 1，33,1%C 2，K2b（R1az93 42,1%+R1b 3,3%+Q1 1,2%） 3，K2a（N1a 12,1%+3,7%O） 4，1,2%G-M201 Mongolia C2N1O2→Central Asia/Indo-European/R1a+CaucasusJ2a=Eurasian/The modern Turkic people The modern Turkic people→Middle East /JGER1b=Anatonian Turks Q1 went to Siberia and America R1a tribes stayed in Central Asia and later migrated the Iran India and Eastern Europe. Based genetic material obtained from outlying Indus Civilization sites, the male inhabitants mostly belonged to YDNA Haplogroups L (Elamo Dravidian) and H (Adivasi). From this one of the theories that The Indus people were a mixture of groups native to South Asia and migrants from the Central Asia R=R1a+R1b R1b→Western Europe R1a→R1a1a1b1+R1a1a1b2 R1a1a1b1→Eastern Europe→Slavs R1a1a1b2（z93）→Central Asia→Aryan Persians ←R1a1a1b2 →Indian india Brahmins Afghanistan/Pashtun，Iranian people，Tajik，Tocharians/Xinjiang's Indigenous R1a1a1b2 →Indus Civilization LH→indian

Hi, I am from Nepal(mongol face). nice videos and now I realised that we all are from Yellow River(HuangHe)

@artandcraftexporterCHINA

2 жыл бұрын

@Gamer No bro, once u go to the south asia and see😂😂

@nazymzake5425

2 жыл бұрын

😂 your face like Indian but not Mongolian

@debangmaity3972

Жыл бұрын

@@artandcraftexporterCHINA bete. Karwali beizzti😄

@teovu5557

Жыл бұрын

I noticed your people dont seem to know the difference between the words "Mongol/Mongolian and Mongoloid(racial type)....You are not Mongols nor related to Mongolians, you are a Mongoloid people but not Mongol/Mongolian.

@smitchmarcomani5937

Жыл бұрын

Your face don't look Mongol but you consider Mongoloid race.

Many Kazakh people and other Turkic peoples of Central Asia also have Mongolian ancestry due to the history of Mongol colonization of Central Asia and the Golden Horde khanate. There are also many Turkish people that are Asian looking or Eurasian looking as well

@abirmashevv

2 жыл бұрын

No, my people formed after the Mongol invasion. The variety of people in appearance is characterized by the name Kazakh - a free nomad.

@jonjonboi3701

2 жыл бұрын

@@abirmashevv But the Mongols did control Central Asia for a while

@devilangel4655

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonjonboi3701 so the Native Turkic people are Asian looking. Because the Turkish people don’t look at all.

@peterjackson4716

2 жыл бұрын

@@devilangel4655 today turkey people are basically anatolia greek. They have europeans features.

@Toktobay987

2 жыл бұрын

@@peterjackson4716 north-west anatolian turks are europan middle anatolia is central asian-pers mix eastern anatolia is native anatolian,pers,turkic mix

Sirin bal küpü zahracım yine harikasın videolarinla

@ZarakuRaku

2 жыл бұрын

Tesekkur ederim

Turks didn’t originate from Xinglongwa or Hongshan culture but most likely cultures of Southern Siberia Khovsgol/Slab Grave/Uyuk etc.

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

@@barguttobed 🤓

Hi from uzbekistan

Türk Moğollar türk Cengizhan zamanında Ordu'da çok türk varmis

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

@Tarihmerkezi81

4 ай бұрын

Cengiz türk zaten mogol 8. Yy da ortaya cikan kelime

Altaic is just a sprachbund not a language family also most scholars say Turk originated from Altai Mountains if not all.

The number of nomads of Turkic origin that migrated to Anatolia is a matter of discussion. According to Ibn Sa'id al-Maghribi, there were 200,000 Turkmen tents in Denizli and its surrounding areas, 30,000 in Bolu and its surrounding areas, and 100,000 in Kastamonu and its surrounding areas.[25][26]According to a Latin source, at the end of the 12th century, there were 100,000 nomadic tents in the regions of Denizli and Isparta.[27] According to Ottoman tax archives, in modern-day Anatolia, in the provinces of Anatolia, Karaman, Dulkadir and Rûm, there were about 872,610 households in the 1520s and 1530s; 160,564 of those households were nomadic, and the remainder were sedentary. Of the four provinces, Anatolia (which does not include the whole of geographic Anatolia but only its western and some of its northwestern parts) had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households. Between 1570 and 1580, 220,217 households of the overall 1,360,474 households in the four provinces were nomadic, which means that at least 20% of Anatolia was still nomadic in the 16th century. The province of Anatolia, which had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households, saw an increase of its nomadic population to 116,219 households in those years.[28]

They are very cute and adorable people 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲🇲🇳🇰🇷🇯🇵

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

@user-qn7ny3fw8d

2 жыл бұрын

🇰🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇯🇵🇰🇬🇹🇷🇹🇲🇲🇳🇺🇿

@bagusrobiansyah4555

2 жыл бұрын

korean and japan are you serious?

@user-qn7ny3fw8d

2 жыл бұрын

@@bagusrobiansyah4555 Hahaha yes he is, This is all altaïc languages...but you don't know maan you don't 🤣👍🏻 🇲🇳🇺🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇦🇿🇹🇲🇹🇷🇰🇷🇯🇵 All proud to be an Altaï pfff

@tkdblkbelt5483

2 жыл бұрын

Japans Samurai has never been conquered to the Mongol empire, it's not possible to claim Japan under the Mongol empire

They have a different genetic but they do have a similar history both of their language come from Altaic language

@GreatTurkicKhagnate

4 ай бұрын

​@Thomase2_4Your mother fake

Turkic languages and Mongolian languages have many similar words . Naturally, because Turks and. Mongols have lived next to each other for ages .

I went to Kazakhstan, to Astana and Almaty. My father is Dorvod (Oirat) which is Western Mongolian. Everyone thought I was Kazakh and expected me to speak Kazakh or Russian. The Khalkha Mongolians mixed with Chinese and Manchu but not Oirats. Western Mongolians probably are closer to Central Asians than Khalkha Mongols.

@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat

Жыл бұрын

Central Asians are half Indo Iranic ... this is why you not closer to us. we have more Caucasian features, kazakhs are not native in central Asia, they are Mongols too

@baatar

Жыл бұрын

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat There is a significant Turco-Mongol population in Central Asia. I’m not sure whether they are native to the region or not but they do exist.

@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat

Жыл бұрын

@@baatar Natives are not related to Mongols. fake Central Asians like kazakh migrants came from west Mongolia, from Oirat origin changed their language to turkic.

@baatar

Жыл бұрын

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat as far as I know, Turkic nomads have settled in Central Asia as far back as the 6th century so they’re even more native than the whites of North America.

@baatar

Жыл бұрын

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat okay, I think I understand you better now. They didn’t change their language to Turkic, they spoke a Turkic language originally. If you look at Tuvans, Altais, Nogais, and Yakuts, they all speak a Turkic tongue but they look similar to Mongolians. Kazakhs are a Turkic people that just mixed heavily with the indigenous population of Central Asia that didn’t even speak a Turkic language, they spoke an Iranic language like the Tajiks.

I am from india and i am temuri turk🙂

@abumuslim7264

Жыл бұрын

Wow, are you from the Barlas tribe? Are you know turk/uzbek language ?

@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat

Жыл бұрын

Not Temuri, but Baburi. Temur died in Central Asia, Babur went to India

@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat

Жыл бұрын

@People's Republic of East Turkestan Because he likes chilly foods

@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat

Жыл бұрын

@People's Republic of East Turkestan From Russia

@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat

Жыл бұрын

@People's Republic of East Turkestan I have high Sogdian past Ancestors. and Russia Mom with some Polish mixture

Ethnogenesis of the Turkic peoples. Languages, peoples, migrations, customs. Andrey Tikhomirov, 2020 "The Turkic peoples are formed on a vast space in the Altai Mountains. In the process of development of Turkic peoples - their carriers, dialects and languages were formed, characterized by similarities - as a result of the unity of their origin and by differences, which are explained by the collapse of the common base language into dialects, and then into separate languages and groups of languages."

I once learned that the Native Americans also have some link to the Turkic/Mongol people. During the ice age, maybe 20,000 years ago some people in Siberia and East Asia crossed a land bridge linking America to Asia. The first inhabitants were the Inuits, and this explains why they look like Turkic and Mongol people. Then, people spread southwards, and in the end, the Europeans colonized it. That is why I think that there are four different groups of nomads and all of them seem to have at one point inhabited Siberia. The Inuits, Native Americans, Turkic, and Mongol people. Hello from Uzbekistan🇺🇿

Turkic and Mongol peoples are same roots!

@efootballunitedyt.4685

2 жыл бұрын

Looks are different.

@barguttobed

Жыл бұрын

@@efootballunitedyt.4685 Where are u from?

@efootballunitedyt.4685

Жыл бұрын

@@barguttobed Myanmar

@efootballunitedyt.4685

Жыл бұрын

Mongols are not Chinese or Turks, they r totally different from both these 2. One thing Mongols have in common with Turks is culture or else everything is different.

@superboy3633

2 ай бұрын

Some Turks look like North Indian😂😂

Intermarriage between Turks and Greek, Armenian and Georgian natives of Anatolia was not unheard of, although the majority of these unions were between Turkish men and Christian women. The children of these unions, known as 'Mixovarvaroi', were raised as Turks and were of the Muslim faith (although there were some cases of Mixovarvaroi defecting to the Byzantines). It is likely that these unions played a role in the eventual diminishment of the Christian population in Anatolia and its transition from Greek/Christian to Turkish/Muslim. [24] Vryonis Jr, Speros (1971). The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century. California: Berkeley University Press. p. 176.

Good video zara keep going yo

@ZarakuRaku

2 жыл бұрын

Thank uuu

@purevjargalpuujee4845

2 жыл бұрын

@@ZarakuRaku Why are the indonesian so dark skinned ? They look very different from Central Asians. Are they really muslims ? East asian muslims WOOW kzread.info/dash/bejne/k4d3tLCOeKqeiJc.html

Mongols, Kalmyks, Buryats - continuity of the Neolithic of Mongolia - SlabGrave and Han mixtures - late Xiongnu, Xianbei-Xiongnu, Avars Ruan-Ruan, Dzungars. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Yakuts, Khakas, Tuvans - Turko-Mongols of Xianbei-Xiongnu, Kokel culture. Such as Uzbeks, Turkmens, Uyghurs are turkized perso-Iranians mixed with Turko-Mongols. Such as the Turkish-Turks is a turkized by Turko-Mongols Anatolian Greek-Irano-Kurd-Arab-Armenian mix. Volga, Siberian Tatars Chuvash, Bashkirs are Chandman_IA, Okunevo, Pazyryk, Sargat, Tasmola cultures. The Early Hunnu-Huns Uyuk-Saglin culture of Mongolia, TianShan Huns, Scytho-Siberians is common in the case of the Bashkirs and Siberian Tatars, in the case of the Volga Tatars it is usually the hunnized Early Huns Scythian-Siberians - Sarmatians. (Pazyryk, Sargat, Tasmola). Stupid video, since these are little-connected peoples around Asia.

@barguttobed

Жыл бұрын

There is no Han admixture in outer Mongolians Kalmyks and Buryats. But you are right at saying that we are continuation of Slab Grave culture

Zaraku rakı selamlar gardasim Türkiye'den ✋

@ZarakuRaku

2 жыл бұрын

Aleykum selam

@purevjargalpuujee4845

2 жыл бұрын

@@ZarakuRaku Why are the indonesian so dark skinned ? They look very different from Central Asians. Are they really muslims ? East asian muslims WOOW kzread.info/dash/bejne/k4d3tLCOeKqeiJc.html

😅😅 turks in turkey are not original turks but more european blooded. Turks and mongols have strong hold in asia it self. Apart from.the ottomon. Alot of powerful empires were ethnic turks mix with mongols such as the khilji dynasty, timurids and the mughal empire. This comment section is a joke . To much enmity between one another

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

I don’t even know if Khalji rulers married with Mongols

Ассалаумалейкум!! Я КАЗАШКА ИЗ ЗАПАДНОГО КАЗАХСТАНА МАНГИСТАУСКИЙ ОБЛАСТЬ ИЗ ПЛЕМЕНИ АДАЙ!

машаАллах

@barguttobed

2 жыл бұрын

Что видео дурадское

❤️🇮🇩🇹🇷

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

Even Mongolians look very different

@Tarihmerkezi81

4 ай бұрын

I don't agree with your ridiculous comment. Changes in people vary according to climate and conditions. The important thing is that the blood carried at home stays white in the north, you become black in the south or in hot places, you darken, but this does not change your blood. If there is Turkishness in your blood, you can adapt to anywhere. Since you used to be close to China, a person's assimilation and the North When you came to central Anatolia, where your hair was scattered, you were cloudy and brown-eyed, your eyes opened and widened even more. This is entirely related to the climate. You were in hot places. My skin turned black, but your blood never changed. This blood is the same blood. Turkey's War of Independence In this time, with this blood This war could only be won with the blood of a Turk. Could you please enlighten me?

Modern mongols resemble like thé Tungustic people the ancient mongols probably looked more like the central Asian Turks

@barguttobed

Жыл бұрын

Not at all

Turkic and mongolians have same origin. The difference between them is that Turkic people spreaded all over the world and mixed with with little caucasians. Just look at Tuvans, Atais. They have more asian looking than other turkic.people. By the way, Assalomu alaykum from Uzbeks.🇺🇿

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

Turkics are Bolgars mixed with Mongols ,or just Bolgars in Asia ,one of the branches.

@Tokyo2905

2 жыл бұрын

لاتوجد اسلاف مشتركين بين الاتراك والمغول فقط هناك مغول مستتركين و Tuvan موروثهم الجيني على الهابلوگروب Q و R1a وهم بذلك اتراك اما المغول على الهابلوغروب C2b وهو ليس موجود عند الاتراك

@yusufdunphy5402

2 жыл бұрын

True that because Turkic and Mongol people can trace their origin back to Northeast Asia and not to mention, the very first Turkic peoples were from Mongolia.

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

Turkics came out of Bolgars . Turk is a new modern made up name

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

@@yusufdunphy5402 when you look into Turkic genetics which are from 70 up to 90% european genetics ,then you will realise that you talk none sense.

Mongol, Turk, Japan, Koreans, Hungarians are the branches of same tree as genetically and linguisticaly.

@mehmetkrcl7841

2 жыл бұрын

Ural-altai but Hungarians are not Turks today

@cengizhhhhhhhhhhkeskin6084

2 жыл бұрын

@@mehmetkrcl7841 how do you know? They are Christian and mixed other Christian people . We are muslim and mixed other muslim people.

@mehmetkrcl7841

2 жыл бұрын

@@cengizhhhhhhhhhhkeskin6084 Ne diyon olm ne hıristiyan ı günümüzde Macar'lar Türk değil dedim sadece

@cengizhhhhhhhhhhkeskin6084

2 жыл бұрын

@@mehmetkrcl7841 olum ben dedim ki biz nasıl diğer müslümanlarla karistiysak onlar da hristiyanlarla karıştı. Niye Turan kurultayı Macaristan'da yapılıyor?

@mehmetkrcl7841

2 жыл бұрын

@@cengizhhhhhhhhhhkeskin6084 kendilerini Atilla nın torunu olarak görüyorlar bakıyolar Atilla da Avrupalı değil Tengrist bir orta asyalı Türk... Sonra diyolar ki bizim atalarımız Türk bız imde türk olmamız lazım sonra başlıyorlar Türk'üz demeye yani onların ne kendilerine Türk demeleri nede turan a üye olmaları onları Türk yapmaz. Ama ataları Türk Atilla ve Avarlar

Proto Turks had Turano-Gobid warrior face facial features unlike Mongolic or Para-Mongolic peoples.

@barguttobed

Жыл бұрын

Gobid is mongolian phenotype

Most of Turkic and Mongolian tribes are nomadic. Those who have horse-riding tradition are heavily heterogeneous and have wide different features of face shape, skull size, eyes, hair color, nose shape and size, body build, ear size, cheek bone, and others There is influential groups of nomads who are Turkic-Mongolian raiders. They invaded westwards since 2500 BC in three main routes. 1. Bharat and stan-countries; 2. Iran, Sumer and 3. north and west of Caspian Sea. These raids, colonization and sexual intercourse added wide variations to their already mixed features. Turkic-Mongolian raiders formed the Persians; various khanates including Khazars. Turkic-Mongolian raiders changed their original mixed features by reproduction from females from many nations in Central, Western Asia and Europe. While Turkic and Mongolian peoples have distinctive features, Turkic-Mongolian raiders have little common features or language.

Origin of Japanese: Haplogroup D1a2 and C1a1 are suggested to have arrived into Japan during the prehistory of Japan, during the Jōmon period. D has its highest diversity within Tibeto-Burmese groups and the oldest D lineage was found im western Tibet and one sample in the Altai region. Y-DNA haplogroup D1, making up 40% of the Japanese male lineages Haplogroup D1a2a is found among the Ryukyuans as well as the Ainus, and is t hought to have been the dominant paternal lineage of the Jōmon people. K2a/NO During the Yayoi period, haplogroup O1b2+O2a started to arrive and spreaded to every region of Japan. Just over half of Japanese men belong to haplogroup O. The vast majority belong to O1b2, a lineage found especially in Manchuria, Korea and Japan, and O2a, the main Han Chinese paternal li neage. A negligible percentage of the Japanese belong to the O1a and O1b1 The O-M175 haplogroup origin were Yunnan-Burma border，and separated into 2 branch, O1 (O-F265) and O2 (O-M122) O2 - Sino-Tibetan O1=O1a+O1b O1a Austronesians. O1b1 Austroasiatics O1b2 moved to Korea/Samhan people Approximately 3% of Japanese men belong to haplogroup N, a lineage that is thought to have originated in China some 35,000 years ago It is found at low frequencies in Korea and could have arrived with the Yayoi people. Alternatively, N1 could also have entered Japan via Sakhalin and Hokkaido, as it is present among eastern Siberia tribes Haplogroup N1 was found at high frequency in Neolithic and Bronze Age remains (4500-700 BCE) from the West Liao River valley in Northeast China (Manchuria) by Yinqiu Cui et al. Haplogroup N1 is found especially among Uralic and Turkic peoples nowadays, including among the Finns, Estonians and Sami in Northeast Europe K2b/Q Haplogroup Q is the dominant lineage of Native Americans, but originated in Siberia. it is possible that the tiny fraction of Japanese Q lineages came with Yayoi farmers. It is unlikely to have entered Japan through Hokkaido as it is not found among tribes at the eastern extremity of Siberia, nor among the Ainus. In conclusion, approximately 43% to 48% of modern Japanese men carry a Y-chromosome of Jōmon origin. The highest proportions of Y-DNA haplogroup C and D is found in northern Japan (over 60%) and the lowest in Western Japan (25%). This is concordant with the history of Japan; the Yayoi people of Sino-Korean origins having settled first and most heavily in Kyushu and Chūgoku, in Western Japan Haplogroup C is another extremely old lineage that left Africa approximately 60,000 years ago and spread over most of Eurasia. Two subclades of C are found in Japan: C1a1 and C2a. The first group to separate was C1, which colonized the Middle East and South Asia. One branch (C1a ) may have moved north to Central Asia and then split in two: One tribe moved to Europe (haplogroup C1a2,C1a2 is now nearly extinct in Europe.), while the other migrated to East Asia and survives today only in Japan (C1a1). Haplogroup C2a, representing also 3% of the population, is typically found among the Mongols and Siberians. It might have come with the Ainu through Sakhalin island and Hokkaido, or along with the Yayoi farmers from Korea. The second branch of C1 spread into South Asia, Southwest Asia, and Central Asia, where it is found today at low frequencies (C1b1a1). During this time, other C strains continued their eastward migration into Southeast Asia, where they split into four main regional clusters: The first branch colonized Indonesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (C1b2a). A second branch went south to Australia, where they became the Aborigines (C1b2b). Another settled in the highlands of New Guinea (haplogroup C-P55). The fourth branch went as far as Northeast Asia (haplogroup C-M217) and is now widespread mainly among the Mongols (Kalmyks, Buryats, and Oirats), the Turkic peoples of Central Asia (Kazakhs, Karakalpaks, Uzbeks, Dolgans), and the East Siberian tribes (Chukchi, Itelmen, Nivks, Tungus). Furthermore, it is also common in moderate amounts among Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans, but also among several indigenous peoples of North America, including some Na-Dené, Algonquian or Siouan-speaking populations.

@brainblox5629

Жыл бұрын

Ainus even share some religious customs with ancient Tengrists (Turks and Mongols) like not washing things in rivers to not "pollute" them. Or giving normal names to their kids only after a certain age while only giving bad ones when younger.

@ahmadsufian9899

Жыл бұрын

What about origins of Malays?

Mongol word came only after Chingis Khan , Kipchack,Nomad,Mongol,Turkic,Kazakh mean free under sky

@Orgil.

2 жыл бұрын

Name Mongol was before Chinggis khaan.

@evenki6687

2 жыл бұрын

@@Orgil. nope

@Orgil.

2 жыл бұрын

@@evenki6687name Mongol occurred 3rd century

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

@@Orgil. Mongolic peoples were under the rule of Para-Mongolic, Turkic and Tungusics before Genghis Khan and Sinitic, Tungusics after Dzunghar Conquest 🤪 only 500 years history you have lol

@Orgil.

Жыл бұрын

@@papazataklaattiranimam 500 years 😂 then you anatolian arabs have 99 years of history

The comments are full of ignorance. Especially the bot account that makes the Altaic theory nonsense as if it is real and spamming the fringe theory.

..Wolf Eyes & Wolf Eyes..Turks.. ( their skin ; Near White and Wheat is Skinned) ( her hair ; Light Coffee And is brown) (Eyes; Slightly Slanted and Slanted Up, triangle-like .. Mostly Light Brown and Hazel Color Similar to Green ) ( Head and Nose are Longer ) ( Neck is longer and Head is larger ) ( Body Length is Longer and Legs are Longer ) ( Asia's Most Beautiful Nation ) 🙃🙂😉😘🥰☺

@alwaysright3943

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao

My father is Mongolian from Ulanbaataar and my mother is real caucasian blond haired German 😊

Inner Mongolians are chinese citizens. Therefore they mixed with chinese more

Zaraku hanım selamlar

Mongolis turkish ✋

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

i gotta it was fun watching but some of the pictures were no accurate. Like the pics of the mongols were really old fashioned so not updated because nowadays people look different more like korean looking but older people like these pictures and there is a lot of similarities with mongols and turkic people but just like kirgyz people looked very similar to mongols not completely tho

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

@dinaerdene3312

2 жыл бұрын

@LanguagesPro korean and mongols are related back in the days and a lot of koreans have mongolian dna and also chinese and I am saying that Mongolians nowadays look more east-asian cuz I am mongolian too and I dont look like ancient mongolians

@dinaerdene3312

2 жыл бұрын

@LanguagesPro what I am saying is we look different now than back then so the pics are not completely accurate. So these mongols have more darker skin but now its more light skin but people from the countrysides do have similar features but not completely

@oliviaolivia3326

2 жыл бұрын

@LanguagesPro kim jong un pass as mongolian better

@baatar

Жыл бұрын

@@dinaerdene3312 you probably don’t descend from Mongolians or maybe you have mixed heritage from Chinese-Manchu people.

In Fact Original Turks Are Mongolian. I Think Its Little Sensitive,Term Of The Turk Or Turkic,Usually For Moslem Mongol. More Extended If You Use It Term Of Turan Or Turanian. Piece Of The Altaic Language (Branch Of Ural-Altaic Family Language) Is Samoyed Languages Are Including Finno Ugrik Languages (Finnish,Komi,Nenet).

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

Ancient Mongolia ns were actually Turkic peoples

Selam Zaraku hanım.

@ZarakuRaku

2 жыл бұрын

Hello

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

Turkic ❌ Turk/Turkish ✅ The use of the term "Turkic" instead of Turk/ish is wrong, it is like the term "azeri" that the Persians coined it against the Turks. Since all English dialects are English and no one calls it "Englic", all Turkish dialects are also Turkish. Organization of Turk/ish States

@turkneferi1210

2 жыл бұрын

Turkic kelimesi dil ailesinin İngilizce deki adı knk germanic(cermen) gibi düşün hata yok İngiliz bı halk zaten cermen halkı İngiliz lehçeleri batı Cermen lehçeleri diye geçer İngiliz bı üst kimlik değildir.

@hilal1029

2 жыл бұрын

@@turkneferi1210 Türk bir dildir, çeşitli lehceleri var. Türkçe dil grubu diye bir şey yok, Altay dil grubu var. "turkic" Türkleri ayrıştımak için düzmece bir terimdir, anlamı da "Türk kökenli, Türke benzer" demektir. Ingilizce Germanic (Altay dil grubu gibi) dil grubudandır, lehce yok, bam başka bir dildir,

@turkneferi1210

2 жыл бұрын

@@hilal1029 dostum hatam var cermen dil ailesi Hint Avrupa dil ailesinin bı dalıdır Türk dil ailesi de Altay dil ailesinin bir dalı .

@user-xv9rf2ll3m

2 жыл бұрын

You're wrong... it's a family language. Slavic,Germanic,Latin and etc but they're all Indo-European.

@alwaysright3943

2 жыл бұрын

Azeri's are Turkified Iranians, meaning genetically identical to the neighboring Iranian peoples.

turkish so mixed people. I mean, we cannot say that Turkish people resemble this nation.

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

Turkish are Pomaks ( converts ) not Turkics at all. 90% mixed genetics in Turkey and first name of the state is Roman Sulatante

@eroktartonga4032

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mx3mm7rv9f Fake account.

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

@@eroktartonga4032 keep crying

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

@@eroktartonga4032 Turkish-90% mixed genetics First name of Turkey-Roman Sultanate The word Turk banned during the Ottoman Empire Mehemd the Conqueror was considered Ceasar of Rome Turkics -70 -90% european genetics Turk -new made up term by european historian for a linguistic group not for a nationality Game over pal

@eroktartonga4032

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mx3mm7rv9f You arent even funny.

Good job! Thank you

So your video only showing similar face and body parts that similar with Mongolian people's. So some scientists suggest Kazakh people' etc are split from Mongolian ancestors from 7000 years ago it means Mongolians have bone nation's and its from very long time ago. So it means Mongolians existed from very long time ago and Mongolians ancestor probably khvnnv know as ХҮННҮ. And I'm not really appreciate that you people's talking like Mongolians are from kazakh or something😕

Although Germanics mostly carry EEF and Celtic genes, no one calls them assimilated, or when Cushitic, Chadic, Omotic and Ethiopic peoples mix with blacks, no one cares. But when it comes to Turks, absurd sentences are being made like you have assimilated and become a Turk. The funny part is that the Greeks and Armenians in no way carry the genes of their Proto-ancestors and say you are assimilated 😂😂😂

@anomalianomali5080

Жыл бұрын

I agree, yes, most of the nations in the world are like that, like the British are only 20% Anglo Saxon, the Chinese are only 30% Han Chinese, the Turks are only 10%-20% Turkic, the Bengalis are only 10-20% Indo-Aryan, so there is nothing special and unique about Turkish identity actually. And Turks have the right to regard and identify themselves as Turkic just as the British and Chinese identify themselves as Anglo Saxon and Han Chinese. but i think, why so many people trolled turkish identity is because of past genocide and turkish sentimen over antipathy towards greeks and armenian

Yes. It is true. Mongols look like Chinese and Korean

@ibovabuncilrininanasnabosa5919

2 жыл бұрын

monqollar türklərədə bənzəyirlər

@kamzh9834

2 жыл бұрын

@@barguttobed the author said that Mongols look like Chinese. I think so. I am not jealous.

@kamzh9834

2 жыл бұрын

@@barguttobed по моему ты стесняешься того, что ты похож на китайца или корейца. Но это чистая правда. Вы действительно на них похожи. Глаза очень узкие, кожа темная, волос на теле очень мало. Некоторые монголы прямо таки вылитые корейцы.

@kamzh9834

Жыл бұрын

@@barguttobed я не похожа на китаянку. Не мне ли лучше знать о моей внешности????? Вот все буряты, калмыки, монголы на одно лицо: темная кожа, узкие глаза, жесткие черные волосы.

@kamzh9834

Жыл бұрын

@@barguttobed похожи похожи на китайцев. Нечего отрицать свою внешность. От того, что ты отрицаешь свою внешность, похожим на нас не станешь.

Azerbaijanis and anatolian turks: ok, we're gonna head out 😃🇦🇿🇹🇷

Really??

CN is the Haplogroup of Altaic people. the N came from East Asia and currently share genetics with the Siberian North Asians Proto-Turks were genetically and linguistically closer to Mongols and Tungusic people. Their Homeland was Manchuria hg NOC. These are Northeast Asian People. East Asian Ydna=NCO+DQ 1，N-M231 Turkic languages：Yakut，Khakas Finno-Ugric：Nenets people，Nganasan people，Finns 2，C-M217 Mongolian Kazakhs Manchu 3，O-M175 Chinese Korean Japanese D-Japanese，Tibetan，Ainu people Q-Turkmen（Karakalpakiya 73% ）, Native American，Inuit，Yeniseian people Ydna N+C 1，Northern Tungusic：Evenks，Evens，Oroqen 2，Mongolic languages：Buryats，mongolian，Kalmyks 3，Paleo-Siberian：Chukchi people 4，Turkic：Tuvans，Kazakh，Dolgans，Yukaghir people Ydna C+O 1，Southern Tungusic：Manchu，Xibe 2，Southern Mongolic 3，Northern Chinese, Korean Ydna O+D Japanese，Tibetan East Asian mtDNA=ABCD A（Its highest frequencies are among Native Americans, its largest overall population is in East Asia, and its greatest variety (which suggests its origin point) is in East Asia. Thus, it might have originated in and spread from the Far East） B（The greatest variety of haplogroup B is in China. It is therefore likely that it underwent its earliest diversification in mainland East or South East Asia） C (predominantly indigenous Siberian, though some branches are present in the Americas, East Asia, and eastern and northern Europe). D (predominantly northern East Asian, such as Japanese, Okinawan, Korean, Manchu, Mongol, Han Chinese, Tibetan, etc., but also having several branches among indigenous peoples of the Americas) Mongoloid face East Asian face 1，Chinese Korean Janpanese face Ydna O+mtDNA B=Southern Chinese Ydna O+mtDNA CD =North Chinese Ydna O1b2+mtDNA CD =Korean，Janpanese/Yayoi 2，Janpanese/Jomon people，Tibeto-Burman languages face Ydna D1a1+mtDNA G=Tibetan Ydna D1a2+mtDNA CD=Janpanese/Jomon people Ydna D1a2+mtDNA MND=Ainu people 3，Vietnamese people, Thai people face Ydna O1b1 O1a+mtDNA BF North Mongol face Ydna C+mtDNA CD=Mongolian，Tungusic peoples Ydna N+mtDNA CD=Yakut，Khakas，Nenets people，Nganasan people Ydna NC+mtDNA CD=Buryats，Evenks，Evens，Oroqen，Chukchi people，Tuvans，Dolgans，Yukaghir people，Kazakh Native American face Ydna Q+mtDNA ACD=Native American，Eskimo & Inuit Ydna Q+mtDNA HU=Turkmen Mongolia, Manchu people，Oroqen people，Evenks，Buryats，Nganasan people，Chinese，Tibetan，Japanese and Korean→80%-100%noc+dq/East Asian/Mongoloid mixed race The modern Turkic people are a mixture of Eurasian People. These includes Indo-Iranian and Indo-European tribes of Central Asia who becomes Turkic for 2000 years ago. This tribes are members of Haplogroup R1a in Central Asia. Kazakhstan 70.63%nocqd+mtDNA CD→ Mongoloid face nocqd+mtDNA HU→Eurasian face(mixed ancestry) Kyrgyzstan→50.1%nocq Uyghurs→30%-35%nocd Uzbekistan→27.1nocq Yeniseian people/Kets→93.7%q Yakuts→94%n Europid→jrgei Iranian peoples→70%jrge Pashtun→90%jrgel Anatolian Turks→80%jrgel Martine Robbeets suggests that the Turkic peoples were descended from a Transeurasian agricultural community based in northeast China, which is to be associated with the Xinglongwa culture and the succeeding Hongshan culture（hg NCO）. The East Asian agricultural origin of the Turkic peoples has been corroborated in multiple recent studies. All Neo-Siberians have origins in Northeast Asia including Korea. They split from common ancestors from Northeast Asians before migrating to absorb Paleo-Siberians/R1aQ. Korea C12.9 D2.5 N3.8 O1a 3.1 O1b 33.4 O2 42.1 Q1.8 Manchuria C14.3 D0 N5.7 O1a 2.9 O1b 8.6 O2 65.7 Q0 Western Japan C7.2 D26.8 O1a 4.1 O1b 37.1 O2 23.9 Tibet C2.6 D51.6 N4.5 O2 33.9 Q3.2 Han chinese O2 O1a 13,0% C- M217 12,0% N-M231 10,3% O1b 7,2% Q-M242 4,2% The original turkic people N are very similar to O (chinese，korean，japanese), they came from the same gene haplogroup NO but absolutely different from J（J1+J2/Turkey） Type of east Mediterranean people.

@ZarakuRaku

2 жыл бұрын

Wow thanks for this information👍😁

@aktayturan9272

2 жыл бұрын

Hello interesting comment! I'm Turkish and I have Hablogrup N Y-23757. I have a list of my Hablogrups but I have no C and O but Q and D. I also match with Mesoamerican Andeans which means I have Siberian roots too. Do you have explanation why I have don't C and O even I have Siberian roots? This is the result of Mytrueancestry of all my Hablogrups: Y-DNA BT, E1b, G, H2, J, L1, L2, N, Q, R1a, R1b, R2, T mtDNA D, G, H, H1+H3, H5, HV, HV0+V, I, J, K, L, N, R, T1, T2, U, U2, U3, U5, W, X

@Tokyo2905

2 жыл бұрын

انت مخطى الاتراك القدماء كانوا Scythians R1a و Sarmatian R1b انتقلوا الى سيبيريا وتحالفوا مع شعب Yansei Q وشعب Tagar R1a وبذلك اختلطت لغتهم بلغات هذه الشعوب اما المغول فهم على الهابلوغروب C2b وهذا الهابلوغروب دخيل من القبائل المغولية على الاتراك ، وجميع اصحاب هذا الهابلوغروب قبائل مغولية الاصل: كالنايمان وقياد وقنغرات ونوغاي وخيتان وجلائير وجميعهم جاءوا من منغوليا ، مؤسس القومية الكازخية Janibek حفيد جنكيزخان الذي وحد المغول مع الاتراك Qıvçaq

@yenidenturktarihtezi

2 жыл бұрын

Proto Turks are not known. But According to genetic analysis from march 2020 Ancient Turks like Gokturks, Uyghurs etc. are not of East Eurasian origin.

@user-rn6nb2ey7e

2 жыл бұрын

@@yenidenturktarihtezi Proto-Altaic language=Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic+Uralic languages+ Koreanic (sometimes included) Japonic (sometimes included) Native American ？？ 1，Turkic=Yakut，Tuvans，Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uyghur, Uzbek, Turkmen, Turkey，Dolgans，Yukaghir people，Khakas 2，Mongolic=Mongolian，Buryats，Kalmyks Turkic/Mongolic=Yughur，Hazaras 3，Tungusic peoples=Manchu，Ulch people，Oroqen people，Evenks，Xibe，Nanai people，Orok 4，Finno-Ugric languages=Nenets people，Nganasan people，Finno Ugric/Mongolic/Paleo-Siberian=Chukchi people，Ительме?ны 5，Koreanic+Japonic=Korean, Japanese, Ainu The first migration/Proto-Altaic 1，HaplogroupNO→Mongolia/C=Mongolic 2，HaplogroupCO→Korean Peninsula/O1b2=Koreanic 3，HaplogroupCO→Japanese archipelago/D=Japonic, Ainu 4，HaplogroupNOC→Manchuria=Tungusic Northern Tungusic Ydna N+C Southern Tungusic Ydna C+O 5，ProtoAltaicNC→Siberia→Ugric/Northern Tungusic/Paleo-Siberian/Mongolic/Turkic Second migration 1，Mongolia NOC→Central Asia/Indo-European/R1aJ=Eurasian/The modern Turkic people 2，Siberia N→Eastern Europe/Northern Europe=Tatars N+R1a，Finnish N+I，some Slavs R1aI+N 3，The modern Turkic people→Middle East /JGER1b=Anatonian Turks Northeast Asia D-M174 and C-M217→Origin: Mongolia/Northern China D1 → Hokkaido C1a1/C2e→Japan →Jomon people D1a2 D1→ Tibet → Tibetans (Aborigines D1a1 + O2) Genetic testing has shown that the Ainu and Jomon people belong mainly to Y-DNA haplogroup C1a1,C2e and D1a2 C2→Mongolia, Manchuria, Siberia，American Continent→Mongolic+Tungusic+Native American Genghis Khan's family C2b，C2c Aisin Gioro/Manchu people C2b1a3a* (C-M401*, (xF5483)) Native American C2b1a1a Liao civilization/hongshan culture C2e Haplogroup NO，Origin: mainland China, Indochina haplogroup N - Uralic languages/Yakuts Haplogroup O - Korean，Japanese，Chinese N (M231)+O2→Manchuria C2e/C1a1→Liao River Civilization 遼河文明/Hongshan culture 1，Southeast China O1b→Korean Peninsula→Samhan 2，Liao civilization O2+C2e/C1a1→Korean Peninsula→Goguryeo 3，Koreans=Samhan+Goguryeo Korean =20%-37%O1b2+40%O2 +15%C2 4，Korean Peninsula O2+O1b2→ Japanese (Yayoi people) 5，Japanese = Yayoi people + Jomon Janpanese=35-40％D1+30​​-35％O1b2+15-20％O2 6，Haplogroup N→ Siberia→Yakut，Nenets people，Nganasan people Nenets people 56.8%N1a2b-P43，40.5% N1a1-Tat Nganasan people 92.11%N1a2b-P43 ，5%C，3%O Yakut people 94% N1a1-Tat (N1a1a1a1a4-M2019>N-M1993）

We are mixed asian peoples

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

True

@retro12391

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mx3mm7rv9f where are you from

@tahabeksfk292

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mx3mm7rv9f ıam nogai turk

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

@@tahabeksfk292 so you a Bulgarian then ,we settled down your nationality . Turk is a modern term gotten in use by western european historians and implanted ,and it has a negative meaning . Turkics in asia have from 70 up to 90/100% european genetics ,so that means immigartion from Europe went there ,later on all that population .Study Tocharians( scientific term ) ,real name in Greek archives is Bugoro and thing will get clear to you . Turkish are not Turkics( 90% mixed genetics ) ,they are converted muxture of romans ,with stolen Turkic identity ,first name of their state is roman sultante ,and the word turk has been banned there until Atturk. Turk means thief ,bandit ,rapist ,gypsy ! If you want to be of identity theft ,yeah feel free to call yourself Turk .

Chad Wide Faced Turks 🌝

Idk if you've done a vid reaction/seen a video of turkics, siberians etc. compared to native americans, but they were related. Siberians were the original among the original turks.

Real Turkish are Mongols 🤣 but some turks are origanly Greeks

turkmen kizlari cok guzeller.

Tartar Turki adalah bangsa yang membuat kerusakan di muka bumi mereka pantas di sebut keturunan yakjuj makjuj, kamu dari Indonesia aku juga dari Indonesia

Where is anatolia

Allah yardımcımız olsun inşallah

For me as a unknown, the Turkic people also look different for me, the Turkic what i see looks asian more, but the turkic from the Turkish looks East European to me.

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

Turkish are not Turkics ,Turkish are 90% mixed converts of roman slaves mostly.

@devilangel4655

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mx3mm7rv9f Can you explain why they also speaking Turkish? Is that there native leagues?

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

@@devilangel4655 who,what

@devilangel4655

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mx3mm7rv9f The Turkic people speaks also Turkish, so is the Turkish language native from the Turkic people or the Turkish ones?

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

@@devilangel4655 no buddy you are confused .Turkics speak their language, Turkish speak mixture between turkics and iranian,Arabic etc .Turkish are not Turkics ,just converts .

Salam aleikum, from Kyrgyzstan, you look like kyrgyz girl)))

A little bit difference in nose structure and chicks....many turkic like mixed with white...

❤️ kalp anlaşırız diller v farklı olsada

Race and culture are two different things. Each nation is a mix of different racial characteristics. Mongolian and Turkish are clearly different languages. From a linguistic point of view, however, they also have a lot in common. A very long time ago there was an Altaic language that greatly influenced both languages.

@user-rn6nb2ey7e

2 жыл бұрын

The most common Y-DNA haplogroup among present-day East asian：NOCD+Q Phylogenetic trees C-M130=C1 +C2=C1+C2a+C2b+C2c+C2d+C2e C2a→Pan-Asian（China, Japan, Korea, Central Asia, Southeast Asia） C2b→Tungusic（Mongolian+Manchu people），Kazakh，Hazara Kazakh 50.85% Mongolian 53.8％ Aisin Gioro/Manchu people C2b1a3a* (C-M401*, (xF5483)) Native American C2b1a1a “Golden Family” of Genghis Khan C2b C2c C2c→Pan-Asian（China, Japan, Korea, Central Asia, Southeast Asia） C2e→Liao river civilization C2d→Buryats C1=C1a+C1b C1a1→Ainu people，Jomon people C1b→Oceania C1b2b→Aboriginal Australians D1=D1a+D1b D1a =D1a1+D1a2 D1a1→Mainland China, Tibet Tibetan 51.6%D1a1，Qiang people 23% D1a1a，Pumi people 70% D1a1b1 D1a2→D1a2a Janpanese 35-40％ D1a2b Andaman Islands 100% Finno-Ugric languages/Haplogroup NO→ N Nenets people 56.8%N1a2b-P43，40.5% N1a1-Tat Nganasan people 92.11%N1a2b-P43 ，5%C，3%O Yakut people 94% N1a1-Tat (N1a1a1a1a4-M2019>N-M1993） Finno 63.2%N1 Phylogenetic trees Haplogroup NO→O-M175=O1+O2=O1a+O1b+O2a+O2b O1=O1a+O1b1+O1b2 ，The Liangzhu/Hemudu culture O1a→Austronesian FujianO1a→Taiwan→Philippines→Oceania→ Austronesian，Taiwanese aborigines89.6%O1a O1a，O1b1→Tai-Kadai/Zhuang/Baiyue people→Laos,Thailand O1b1→The natives of Mainland Southeast Asia O1b2→Korean O2→Sino-Tibetan=Han chinese+Tibetan Q1→Native American Ket people 93.7%Q Navajo 92.3%Q North American Eskimo (Inuit)-Aleut populations 80%Q Chelkans 60%Q Tubalar 40%Q Genetic history of Indigenous peoples of the Americas：Q1，C-P39

@user-rn6nb2ey7e

2 жыл бұрын

Proto-Altaic language=Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic+Uralic languages/Yakut Koreanic (sometimes included) Japonic (sometimes included) 1，Turkic=Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uyghur, Uzbek, Turkmen, Turkey 2，Mongolic=Mongolian，Buryats，Kalmyks，Yughur Turkic/Mongolic=Hazaras 3，Tungusic peoples=Manchu，Ulch people，Oroqen people，Evenks 4，Finno-Ugric languages/Yakut=Yakut，Nenets people，Nganasan people，Finno Ugric/Mongolic=Chukchi people 5，Koreanic+Japonic=Korean, Japanese, Ainu Martine Robbeets suggests that the Turkic peoples were descended from a Transeurasian agricultural community based in northeast China, which is to be associated with the Xinglongwa culture and the succeeding Hongshan culture. The East Asian agricultural origin of the Turkic peoples has been corroborated in multiple recent studies. Liao civilization →N1,O2,C2e Korea C12.9 D2.5 N3.8 O1a 3.1 O1b 33.4 O2 42.1 Q1.8 Korean =20%-37%O1b2+40%O2 (M122)+15%C-M217 1，Southeast China O1b→Korean Peninsula→ Manchuria→Samhan people/三韓 Farmer/plant rice 2，Liao civilization O2+C2e/C1a1→Korean Peninsula→Goguryeo/高句麗 nomadic people /Growing grain crops (wheat and barley) Korean =Goguryeo+Samhan O1=O1a+O1b1+O1b2/Liangzhu/Hemudu culture FujianO1a→Taiwan→Philippines→Oceania→ Austronesian，Taiwanese aborigines89.6%O1a O1a，O1b1→Tai-Kadai/Baiyue people→Laos,Thailand O1b1→The natives of Mainland Southeast Asia O1b2→Korean Ainu people Genetic testing has shown that the Ainu belong mainly to Y-DNA haplogroup D-M55 (D1a2) and C-M217(C1a1) Janpanese=35-40％D1+30​​-35％O1b2+15-20％O2 (M122) Northeast Japan C12.5 + D 87.5 = 100% 1，D1a2 → Mongolia C1a1/C2e→ Hokkaido →Japan →Jomon people 2，Korean Peninsula O2+O1b2 →Janpan→Yayoi people Janpanese=Jomon people+Yayoi people Tibetan→Sino-Tibetan Tibetan=51.6% D + 33.9% O2 (M122) + 2.6% C-M217 Han(China) C6.0 D0.6 N9.0 O1a 9.6 O1b 16.3 O2 55.4 Q0.6 O2 → Qinghai → Tibet → Tibetan (aborigines D1a1 + O2) O2→Qinghai → Northern China → Han people/O2a2b+O2a2a → Manchuria/Dong yi people/東夷人 D1=D1a1+D1a2 Tibetan 51.6%D1a1，Qiang people 23% D1a1a，Pumi people 70% D1a1b1 D1a2=D1a2a+D1a2b Janpanese 35-40％D1a2a Andaman Islands 100%D1a2b Tungusic peoples=Manchu，Ulch people，Oroqen people，Evenks Manchus are more than 50% haplogroup O. Other than that, both Han and Manchu share roughly the same amounts of hg C and N Haplogroup C2b1a3a* (C-M401*, (xF5483)) has been identified as a possible marker of the Aisin Gioro and is found in ten different ethnic minorities in northern China, but largely absent from Han Chinese. Ulch people 34.6%C2(xM48, M407) 34.6% C2b1a2 11.5% O2, 1.9% O1a,1.9% O1b 5.8%Q-M242 5.8%N-M231 Haplogroup C-M217 Highest frequencies Oroqen 61%-91%C2 Evenks 44%-71%C2 Mongolic=Mongolian，Buryats，Kalmyks，Yughur C-M130=C1 +C2=C1+C2a+C2b+C2c+C2d+C2e C2b → Mongolian ， Kazakhs ， Hazaras Mongolian 53.8％ Kazakhs 50.85% Native American C2b1a1a Genghis Khan s Golden Family C2b C2c Aisin Gioro C2b1a3a* (C-M401*, (xF5483)) Liao civilization C2e C1 = C1a + C1b C1a1 → Ainu people, Jomon People C1b → Oceania C1b2b → Australian Aborigines C2a，C2c，C2d→ Pan-Asian（China, Japan, Korea, Central Asia, Southeast Asia） Mongolian=53.8％C-M217+10.8％O2 (M122)+10.8％N+4.6P* (xQ,R)+9.2R1a Kalmyks 38.7%C2b1a2a，10.8%C2c1a1a1 10.1%N1a1 7.7%R2a-M214 6.8%O2 ................ Turkic=Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uyghur, Uzbek, Turkmen, Turkey Kazakh 1, C2 (50.85%), O2 (10.82%), N (5.33%), Q (3.17%), D (0.46%) 2. R (12.13%), J (8.19%), G (4.95%), E (1.78%) Mongoloid / East Asian→70.63% Kyrgyz 1，C-M130 (33,1%), N1b-P43 (12,1%), O-M175 (3,7%), Q-M242 (1,2%) 2，R1a1a-M198 (42,1%),R1b1b1-M73 (3,3%), G-M201 (1,2%). Mongoloid / East Asian→50.1% Uzbekistan 1,C2b1(12.2%)，O2(2.7%)，N1c(5.4%)，O1b（1.4%），Q1a（5.4%） 2,R1a-Z93（27%）, R1b1(8.3%), R2（2.7%），J2（13,6 %）......... Mongoloid / East Asian→27.1 Uyghur A study based on paternal DNA (2005) shows West Eurasian haplogroups (J and R) in Uyghurs make up 65% to 70% and East Asian haplogroups (C, N, D and O) 30% to 35% Turkey 1, R1b (15.9%), R1a (6.9%) J (33%), E (10.7%), G (10.9%), L (4.2%) 2. C2 (1.3), N (3.8%), Q (1.9%) Turkish men carry Haplogroup J2 as their main Haplogroup and other MID EAST Haplogroups like E-M78, R1B, G, J1 The main sources of Turkish descent are Middle Eastern and European，not Turkic people/Xiongnu ..................................... K2a→NO (M214)→N (M231) +O (M175) Finno-Ugric languages/Yakut=Yakut，Nenets people，Nganasan people，Finno Nenets people 56.8%N1a2b-P43，40.5% N1a1-Tat Nganasan people 92.11%N1a2b-P43 ，5%C，3%O Yakut people 94% N1a1-Tat (N1a1a1a1a4-M2019>N-M1993） Finno 63.2%N .................................... Haplogroup Q-M242→Native American Haplogroup Q1→Xiongnu, Lake Baikal Yeniseian people/Kets(central Siberia） 93.7%Q In Siberia, the regions between Altai and Lake Baikal, which are famous for many prehistoric cultures and as the most likely birthplace of haplogroup Q Navajo 92.3%，North American Eskimo (Inuit)-Aleut populations 80% Chelkans 60%，Tubalar 40%-North Asia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europid Haplogroup R (R-M207) Origin: Central Asia，Eastern Siberia R (R-M207)=R1a+R1b+R2 R1b→Eastern Europe→Western Europe Its subclade R1b1a2 (M269) is the haplogroup that is most commonly found among modern Western European populations, and has been associated with the Italo-Celtic and Germanic peoples. R1a，R2→Central Asia→South Asia→Iran→Scythians/Proto-Indo-Europeans Pashtun/Afghanistan，Iranian people，Tajik，Tocharians/Xinjiang's Indigenous→R1a R2 has been concentrated geographically in South Asia Haplogroup J-M304 Origin:West Asia, Arabian Peninsula Semitic people→J-M304=J1+J2，It is believed to have evolved in Western Asia. J1 is in modern times most frequent in the Arabian Peninsula: Yemen (up to 76%),Saudi (up to 64%) (Alshamali 2009), Qatar (58%),and Dagestan (up to 56%) J2 is found in the highest concentrations in the Caucasus and the Fertile Crescent/Iraq the highest frequencies of J2 are observed in Northeastern Georgia（72%），Cyprus (37%), Crete (34%), northern Iraq (28%), Iranian peoples（23%），Lebanon (26%), Turkey (24%, with peaks of 30% in the Marmara region and in central Anatolia), Greece (23%), Central Italy (23%), Sicily (23%), as well as among Jewish people (19 to 25%)…” Egypt, North Africa→E/G

@TheAnatoli66

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e DNA again, you horn yourself up with dna quantitys. Haven't you ever considered that m-dna is just as important for appearance. We humans are not unicellular organisms and reproduce through cell division. Then of course there is also autosomal DNA, where even such small DNA groups in the population play an important role. But no, egocentrics prefer y-dna. The world is also much more than Russia, China and Europe.

@user-mx3mm7rv9f

2 жыл бұрын

Turkish are converts ( Pomaks ) . Turkish have 90% mixed genetics and speak in Irano-Mongolic ,not completely in Turkic.Even first name of Turkey is Roman Sultanate .

@TheAnatoli66

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mx3mm7rv9f How can you put so much wrong in one sentence? What do you mean with Pomaks? Pomaks are a South Slavic people who converted to Islam. Linguistically and culturally, they have a lot in common with Macedonians and Bulgarians. Could be that they used to have a different language and were later assimilated among the Slavs. Türkish is not a Irano-Mongolian mix language. Between Turkish and Aryan languages ​​there are very old and also a lot of modern loanwords. Saka, later Sogdian lang. have contributed a lot to the development of Turkish. In the Middle Ages, Turkish in turn strongly influenced iranian-Persish. Both languages ​​also have Mongolian loanwords from the time of the Mongol occupations. But they are all three different languages. According to Nostratic and Eurasian language theories, there is an ancient relationship between the Indo-European, Finno-Ugric and Altaic languages.

I'm also still confused. Central Asia and Southeast Asia, they both have small eyes but fight. 😂.

@amoghvastrad3352

3 ай бұрын

Small eyes but big vision.😂😂😂

@superboy3633

2 ай бұрын

Fight3?

Turks look more european !!

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

😂

Ve Aleyküm selam Türk ve Moğolar Aynı ırk olabilir.

Merhaba! Video için teşekkürler!Lütfen genç şarkıcı Diana Ankudinova'ya dikkat edin.AŞIK OLMAYA YARDIM EDEMEM şarkılarına tepki ver, Kişisel İsa, Karga↑ DİANA ANKUDİNOVA yetenekli bir genç şarkıcı. Fikrini bilmek istiyorum. Bence şaşıracaksın. Diana'nın yaşı için çok sıradışı bir sesi ve sanatsal bir sunumu var. 🌹 Önceden 🌹 teşekkürler 🌹

@vdubrovskiy9092

2 жыл бұрын

Diana Ankudinova is an amazing singer,her voice fascinates!

@sergeykot8753

2 жыл бұрын

Diana Ankudinova 😊👍👍🔥🔥🔥💥💥💥💫💫💫🎉🎉🎉💯

@segazavr6596

2 жыл бұрын

я бы посмотрел реакции на Диану Анкудинову!!!

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

Every Mongol have a Turkic blood & Every Turk have a Mongol blood.. Both Language is ALTAIC and the grammar is the same.. for Hungarian, the same situation.. In Central Anatolia (Turkiye) there are many Turkish people who are totally Mongolian as their origin. The shape of body, shape of eyes, shape of face, color of skin.. those all about the climate and place that people live. It has nothing to do with race or genetics.. For example: The Kyrgyz are the core of all the Turkic nations alive today, but Sakha Turks, Tatar Turks, Caucassian Turks, Anatolian Turks, Uzbek Turks, Uygur Turks; they don't %100 look like Kyrgyz, because of the geographical and climatical changes for 2000 years. But the blood is the same. Take 10.000 Mongolian to the Middle Africa, see what they're gonna look like after 1.000 years.. Black guys with wide eyes.. Peace!

Kenapa setiap ada Turk dan mongol mereka bertengakar di kolom komentar khususnya orang turkey

Mongol with wife from Caucasian Greek = turkey Turkmen conclusion

@ibovabuncilrininanasnabosa5919

2 жыл бұрын

sənin ağzında bir nəticədir

Its always easy to distinguish a turkic from a mongol. Turkics almost never ever have a “flat” nose, like the chineese or mongolian. Turkics have a narrower nose somehow smaller. Now watch the videk closely onemore time and see for yourself :)

@yo2trader539

Жыл бұрын

Original Turks and Mongols are genetically identical.

Photos they chose for Mongols in this video are suspicious.

Merhaba zaraku

You should learn more about Central Asia before us many Persian nations lived as Uzbek l say Uzbek are emerged intergation of 96 tribes , mongols are among of it , Persian tribes even some Indian tribes , so our people looks different

@shohzodkomilov4636

2 жыл бұрын

We Uzbeks are also Turks Tajiks are persian nation

@kadirhan807

2 жыл бұрын

*TÜRK İNSANLIĞIN ATASI (Tarihi 40.000 YIL) Natıonal Geographıc: Dünya DNA GEN HARİTASI (Dty Alt Ksm):* kzread.info/dash/bejne/gIyZxKmJisWcgrg.html

@zaynabahmedova7294

2 жыл бұрын

@@shohzodkomilov4636 l want to say that we are not Mongolians , Mongolians are one tribe mixed Turkics , in fact we are most mixed Persian tribes ,

@barguttobed

2 жыл бұрын

@@zaynabahmedova7294 Узбеки все равно происходят больше от тюрков, чем от персов и монголов. Но из кровей имеется тоже немало, у узбек очень много родов древнемонгольского происхождения

@DND480

Жыл бұрын

Тазики узбеки турки не монголы лолишки

Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia are very similar. Turks living in Anatolia are actually Greek Muslims. They want to be different from Christians, so they speak Turkic. Uzbekistan has a lot of Persian blood, so they look like white

@Sadoyasturadoglu

2 жыл бұрын

The point where you're wrong is that; for Turks to be "Muslim Greeks", Greeks must have Hellenik roots first, but many of them have ancient Anatolian and Pontic heritage, so Modern Turks mostly have Medieval Turkic and native(neolitik) Anatolian heritage.

@gsarecevik5000

2 жыл бұрын

Did you even take history classes?Turks first came to Anatolia with Seljuk Empire in 1000’s.Before that we lived in Central Asia.There is a reason why we are mixed that’s bc of Ottoman Empire.Everybody is mixed to a certain extant.But that doesn’t strip us off of our culture and language.We are Turkic

@eroktartonga4032

2 жыл бұрын

Fake account.

@skullsforerlikkhansthrone9306

2 жыл бұрын

We are a mix of Turkmen(mostly, there were also Tatars/Kipchak groups minorly) and Native Anatolian(which is not "greek"(their previous conquerors) per se, as it is not "Turkic"). Turk ethnostructure moves patrilinieally, with dominant culture and language from that ancestor is sufficient to make one Turk. Deal with it. And I don't think your eyes are accustomed to differentiate who is "white" or not, lol.

@misterx3770

2 жыл бұрын

Turks look like Europeans because during the Ottoman Empire many of them married Slavic people and other nations around them, That's why Turkey has a different face from the Turks in Central Asia

I am Hazara and come from Afghanistan but today we are called Hazara but we also have a part of Turk=Mongolian some of us come from Mongol and Changez khan and some come from Turks and some lived in Afghanistan and they all mixed and today we called Hazara.

@Tarihmerkezi81

4 ай бұрын

We are more Turkish than you. Look, how was Turkey founded? How do you think the War of Independence would have been won if there was no Turkish blood? Turks are warriors. The best and strongest Turkish country is Turkey. This is the biggest proof of this.

@Tarihmerkezi81

4 ай бұрын

Never forget that you are a Turk, this quality is a great character and teach this to your children after you, always tell your history, it is an honor to be a Turk.🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿

Aku ingat sejarah melayu archipilago tu je yang complicated.rupanya mongol-turkic lagi complicated ye

Turkic may have mongol blood since ancestor migrate from there. So stunningly some look like mongol/chinese looking

@purevjargalpuujee4845

2 жыл бұрын

They are innermongol(china). china + mongol = innermongolia

@user-cx1ki8li4t

2 жыл бұрын

@Purevjargal Puujee：There are many pictures of Kalmyk in the video.Kalmyk is a Mongolian tribe far away from China

Ancient Turkic Tribes and Mongol tribes are same origin.