This is the nerdiest diss track ever and I love it!

@DentargPL

3 жыл бұрын

This comment made me laugh!

@herranton

3 жыл бұрын

Shaggy's bring the fire.

@MrClintMontgomery

2 жыл бұрын

😂 man what’s awesome is how readily this information is available for consumption. When I started you had to go to film school to learn all of this (various channels, Peter McKinnon, potatoe jet, this guy and others. ). Now there is no excuse. Love these guys providing so much information.

@zaddyxjrx1630

2 жыл бұрын

CURRLY WANTS THE 💨💨💨👿

Let this be a warning to other youtubers that are looking for a new topic for a vlog; don’t mess with anamorphics unless you are Obi Wan Kenobi or Tito Ferradans!

@kentjensen4504

3 жыл бұрын

Hear hear.

@MAKEARTNOWCHANNEL

3 жыл бұрын

hold my beer. :)

@AikiNick

3 жыл бұрын

@@MAKEARTNOWCHANNEL I was just thinking when I read Patrick's comment that there's this zany American KZreadr who models himself after Tony Stark and puts heavy anamorphics on dinky gimbals.

Thanks for the shoutout Tito! I wholeheartedly agree. Once you've seen footage shot on an anamorphic projection lens looking incredible on the biggest ad screen in Europe... It really ends the quality question!

The Anamorphic Professor has spoken

Thanks for video Tito! Glad to see your production quality always keeps improving even after all these years. As affordable anamorphic becomes more widespread, we'll keep seeing these kinds of questions that us scope addicts know all too well. Your channel is still the go-to when it comes to anamorphic know-how, and I think that's something to be proud of. :)

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for the support, Chris!

Thanks for the video and the hard work you and your team put in. I've been a follower for ages and did my first lens mod after watching you do it, been quite a journey there. Love that attitude of appreciating things for what they are and whether they are suitable for the project, instead of judging by the labels that have been slapped on top of them. It's a huge topic, but honestly these days it feels like marketing and consumerism distract people from understanding why they use certain tools, and many people buy things without understanding why or understanding if there's a need for it.

So glad you pointed this out! Great response!

Some good remarks, but mostly… it felt a little bit snobby by « lecturing » him so much while he clearly isn’t into anamorphic since years but still makes very good points from the very beginning (like it is fine and nice of you to explain why the squeeze factor changes with focus, but doesn’t make it less of a pain to guess/correct in post unless you only focus through diopters)

This is one of the best videos I've seen from you for a long as you deal with P.J.'s comments on this lens in a very (!) professional and nice way - congratulations! And you know what? Just the combination of your introductory video, P.J.'s great footage, and now your great comments make this lense even more attractive than ever before. Thanks to you and P.J.!

It's not so much that potato jet was incorrect on alot of points, it's that he always talks like he is absolutely correct on everything he says. For me, PJ has a slight troll quality in his reviews. The way he man handles expensive gear is highly irritating. The most amazing camera can come out and PJ will most likely throw up a video saying why he will never buy it. It was so satisfying to see a calm, educated clap back video. SUBBED!

@AlexandreVidal

Жыл бұрын

He'll never buy it because all gear manufacturers will send him for free so he can be snobbish about that lol

Phenomenal response!! Invaluable information! I use with ease of understanding and practical experience two ISCO anamorphic adapters thanks to many of your posts and explanations! Thank you Anamorphic professor and please Keep it up!

Wow there is a lot to learn about Anamorphic Lenses! Thanks for this insightful video!

man i like how you explain it and you saved me time talking to my friends about it am just gonna share this video with them :)

Thank you for your service Tito!

Great job sir, appreciated and well done. I enjoy your positive energy in pointing out that various equipment have both strengths and weaknesses but the operator must be sensible about how and when to use it.

Hi, I followed you a year now and also Potato J. But when I saw his „review“ I was laughing out loud because of the exact points you talk about. Very great form you to send out this correction in such a nice way. Love it. I will become a member of you Chanel and spend „a coffee“ a month to support you. Keep going with your content. Love it. Stefan

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! It's awesome when more people join! Come on folks, it's easy!

Great stuff Tito! Keep rocking 🔥🔥

tito is literally the goat this is so well informed and respectful!!

amazing video Tito, thanks for making it !

Wow ! This video is so great and so clear!! Thanks mate!!

Great Video. Thanks a lot for pointing these out!

Thankyou for the explanation! Very helpful 🙏🙏

I had already seen Potato Jet’s video and in reviewing it you produced a really useful resource for us all. My impression of Potato Jet is that he is a really lovely guy and I am sure he will appreciate your input. More reviews please :)

This is beautiful! I love responses like this

Thanks for the encouragement Tito! I feel more confident now to bring the DIY 2X Elmoscope onto my next professional project 👍🤓

I love your energy. thank you, I have been almost made my decisions by Jet's opinion only, thank you for making everything clear up.

Subscribed. Love the amount of knowledge this guy has to offer.

I'm glad you guys can have this civilized dialogue and add corrections to educate people rather than arguing :D no youtube drama here just film nerds who want to get the best results

Man, thanks so much! I actually watched his video yesterday (again) and said to myself: ditch the idea of buying the 50mm from Sirui. Today, KZread recommended your video :)

I love the way that you response to potato jet... you have to do a colab guys!!

Gene never said the filters were bad he just said he personally hated them

@WEHAVETHISDREAM

2 жыл бұрын

Nice.

@alexnather7614

Жыл бұрын

Right he put words in his mouth thank m you

Glad you brought it up.

I am a highly experienced photographer and have yet to meet a lens - any lens at all, that I did not like. But I do like choosing the right lens for the job. That is where the experience comes in. Mister Potato needs to apply himself more succinctly in terms of critical review of technical attributes he does not yet quite understand.

It is good you uploaded this video. I just like every conversation about this topic and we as filmmakers should discuss about our projects and videos to gain more and more knowledge out of it.

Tito is the man! We love anamorphic for imperfections!

Thanks for the video, very well explained!

The squeeze issue - instead of adjusting the width, just stretch the height a tad. Lose a little of the top and bottom and you will maintain the width,.just remember to keep enough headroom.

Damn! I love this channel so, as much as I love anamorphics, dayum! Thanks for this Tito, you rock. And there's nothing wrong with what Gene said, but Tito went deeper obviously, what our friend PotatoJet wanted was a light review on his channel talking as open as possible, and he did which is why I think he is a great person and a fun with lots of informational bits channel. Again, the expert here will be Tito.

Great response! I hope he sees the video. You bring up some great points.

Very professional response. Great job bro!

I don't think potato was dissing anamorphic so much as expressing his personal preference. He's allowed to have his opinions. Tito does a great job on the deep-dive in this response, I didn't think he was dunking on potato so much as explaining why anamorphic lenses are just... different!

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Yeah, I really like that Gene/Potato has brought anamorphic to a much wider audience! I don't want to put him down at all, just expand on ideas I thought could benefit viewers! :)

@AdamTV

3 жыл бұрын

I own all 3 Sirui lenses. I have watch most of the review videos on all three. I cannot think of one review video that brings up the de-squeeze issue that Potato Jet raises. It is a valid point and one that will affect my use of the lenses going forward. We may not like Potato Jet conclusions but his technical observations were spot on. That is where this channel comes in because it helps us drill down on the issue and put things in perspective. We have to first understand the issue and then learn how to work with it. I am sure we will do that moving forward. I think we owe both these channels a debt of gratitude for their contributions on this topic.

@WEHAVETHISDREAM

2 жыл бұрын

You’re allowed to have opinions, BUT it would be more helpful if you actually did some more research, experience stuff, BEFORE putting it out there ;-)

@WEHAVETHISDREAM

2 жыл бұрын

Generally speaking.

You're a classy dude. This channel deserves to grow 10-20 times. Like right now.

Great analysis, great critique. Keep the good work!

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

Much appreciated!

Someone had to say it!

Don’t forget Terrence Wilkins wonderful work with his Cinelux. But hey I’m glad Mr. Potato finds the adapters not to his liking, and his subscribers will stop driving the prices up for us true aficionados.

@seanning1276

3 жыл бұрын

thank you, just followed him on vimeo

very competent and comprehensive argumentation against a rather emotional and not so profound "criticism"; the other guy not even knows about differing squeeze factors in relation to focussing... a simple beginners knowledge.. the same with the criticism about IBIS etc. thank you very much for your efforts to make that clear

Wow. Awesome video. So much good information. I'm about to buy this 35mm for a film I'm about to shoot on the Panasonic S5. It's available for L mount now. (At least according to Amazon and B&H. Hope that's true) Excited to shoot with it, and grateful I found your channel. About to devour some more of your videos. Thanks for sharing all this valuable infornation. Much appreciated.

my 2 cents: potato jet is a legit content creator, really funny dude, and has become super knowledgeable on general industry tech. his following completely warrants this kind of response so good on you for defending the lenses. THAT SAID, any real story teller with a true affinity for cinematic story telling would never complain about any of what potato jet had a problem with. youtubers in general tend to over analyze out of a need to make extensive content. and while their opinions absolutely matter, they should NEVER solely guide a true filmmakers decision. I.e. dismissing the adapters over extra time in post... when working on a budget you will always have to work extra in post on one thing or another. its a trade off so if you like the look of those anamorphic adapters, maybe the 5 seconds per clip in post is worth it. We live in such an amazing time for story tellers right now where we can buy everything we need to make a career defining feature film for under 10k but you'd never guess it if you only paid attention to youtubers who's entire jobs are to push the limits of tech designed to compete with equipment 10x more expensive. (bmpcc vs alexa videos crack me up) sorry this was so long winded but for me, the creators of affordable groundbreaking tech do far more for the creative space than any one person's opinion of their products. creators like Potato Jet are fantastic but let's not give them more power than they deserve.

@AnimeZone247

Жыл бұрын

the price of the gear doesn't matter as much. At least i wouldn't put that much thought into it. Take for instance the Ursa mini 12k is comparable to the alexa mini LF. Search ursa 12k vs alexa mini lf.

Nice man! Very positive energy response

Hi Tito & Potato Jet, just a quick update: in the meanwhile I purchased the lens, experimenting with it on my Lumix S1H since a few weeks. This lens exceeded my expectations by far: built like a tank, perfect smoothness of both focus and apperture, razor sharp from edge to edge, nice flares when light hits the lens directly from the front, on the other side quite robust against unwanted flaring (I did not expect this!). Yes, there is some little squeeze-breathing when focusing - but not too wild and a result of the selected construction and not Sirui's fault. Only challenge I still have with this lens is finding the perfect focus w/o using the internal EVF of my S1H, i.e. in run & gun mode. So, I am practicing and practicing and getting better every day. Another thing I was totally unaware of is that when using the 5.4 K mode on my S1H, this lens with its 1.6 squeeze factor turns my S1H into an 8,64 K monster! Yes, the additional resolution gets created by the NLE (in my case Davinci Resolve Studio) when interpolating additional pixels during horizontal desqueeze - but it all looks so great and immersive. When I recently used my spherical lens and reviewed the footage on my screen I felt like watching an 'amputated' piece of video. Guess what, this is my 'always on lens' for the time being. Thanks to Tito for bringing 'The Anamorphic' to so many of us!

Good job, Tito; valid rebuttal! We don't all have the same privileges and getting to work with this or that gear. It's best to remain humble, thankful, encouraging and enthusiastic about our craft and art. Anamorphics have been a niche within a niche for so long: it's nice to see the availability of the various flavors to a wider group of film makers. In the end, it's what you make with what you've got. Thanks for keeping it real.

Thanks for such great info as usual. And thanks for making me realize my Panasonic has that cool advantage of stabilization with anamorphic. Why is it that Panasonic can stabilize the anamorphic - Does it have to be done the anamorphic mode that accompany’s some of their cameras??

@WEHAVETHISDREAM

2 жыл бұрын

Yes. They then apply a different type of stabilization, when in Anamorphic Mode. Pretty cool. Anamorphic on the go! You have to be open and flexible nowadays, not stubborn yourself to rigs and stuff, if the situation is NOT requesting it.

To be honest, I enjoyed this video, and as a guy interested in cinematography and planning to invest in Sirui glasses, it was very informative. Hats off to you, from a brother you'll never meet.

I had no idea about anamorphics. I was looking for a lens and saw an ad of a vintage "anamorphic lens". I was like "what the heck is an anamorphic?" This was about a year ago. Then I watched your video about anamorphic lenses. I decided to get one. Sirui had a 50mm out at that time. I wanted to get it but wasnt sure about the focal length. Then came out the 35mm. Still I couldn't convince myself to get one. But the anamorhic look, the blue horizontal lines were like sirens. Now I have the 24mm and it seems like I don't have enough. Thanks .

@WEHAVETHISDREAM

2 жыл бұрын

Haha. Which one would you recommend for starters and starting with anamorphic? Been researching these days and some time ago too. But, although the 50mm 1.8 is quite “cheap”, I feel that the 24mm could be more useful. BUT, seems to not have so much oval bokeh (duuuh, the wider the smaller bokeh balls…).

This is why I love this channel! lol

So We have to de squeeze in post if we shoot with an anamorphic lens or we can use the footage like shot by other spherical lenses ?

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

You have to desqueeze.

@CaravanMovies

3 жыл бұрын

@@AnamorphicOnABudget Thank you sir

Anamorphic is definitely not for everyone. If someone doesn't like it, there's plenty to criticize. Generally thoguh, the image issues some dislike, are the vary aspects fans love. Including high expense, cumbersomeness ect. Some people enjoy the challenge and the problem solving.

I like you positive vibe dude. Subed!

You can feel his rage that he is trying SUUUUUUPER hard to hold in

Seems like the chillest dude ever 😂

You are the internets jedi master of anamorphic.....love this channel....

ive learned a ton from your vids man thanks

Well done, added value while having respect for Gene!

Great JOB man

Beast! Thank you!

Very good analysis. When you consider that the first ever Cinemascope feature, "The Robe" (1953) was shot with a single Bosch and Lomb lens, all of the above discourse, is purely Academic, as interesting as it is 👍

I have seen that squeeze factor change effect in classic cinemascope film during a shot with extreme focus pull. At the time I attributed it to the cinemascope lens, but wasn't sure exactly what I was seeing. There was one notable example, but it was long ago and I can't recall what film it was.

Great content. What do you think about maintaining one focal length for an entire project and only using diopters? Do you think the issue of the squeezing/desqueezing would be easier to deal with because you'd just have to fix it once instead of every single shot?

I have the 50mm & 35mm Sirui Anamorphic lenses, I'm not complaining.

One correction when you state Panasonic is the only manufacture with stabilization for anamorphic. - the canon c70 does this too - there is actually a menu option for anamorphic image stabilization although it is electronic stabilization and not true IBIS

@AnamorphicOnABudget

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you! The C70 is fairly new, so I was not aware of that!

SUBBED. Great content. I'm looking into anamorphics. That's all I ever try to mimic on my edits

I thought his comments were a little harsh purely based on how great the footage he shot looked. But both the things he ran into and your further explanations gave some valuable insight in how these lenses work and differ from typical lenses. Thanks.

Hi Tito, thanks for all the clarifications. Lot's of great info. Much needed. Do you have a link to the Oliver Kember video sample you referenced in your video?

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

I don't! Oli sent me the file directly. You can find more of his stuff at www.cinesaga.com :)

@filmstudent7389

3 жыл бұрын

@@AnamorphicOnABudget Thank's Tito. Did he tell you what Anamorphic and taking lenses he used?

@cinesagaltd

3 жыл бұрын

@@filmstudent7389 Hey! I shot that footage with a Hypergonar nr.1 (the first 16mm anamorphic projection lens ever made, by Henri Chretien, the inventor of cinemascope!). I think the taking lens in those shots was a good old 58mm Helios!

@filmstudent7389

3 жыл бұрын

@@cinesagaltd Thanks for letting me know. Amazing work. The shots from Tito's sample footage look truly stunning. Do you have a link anywhere to the full piece so we all can enjoy it in its entirety?

Thank you so Much sir For Guide us

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! :D

impressive video, I do not know much about anamorphic lenses, I would like to use anamorphic or anamorfake lenses, any easier method to convert helios 402 or sigma art 35mm to anamorfake?

Great video Tito! I've always maintained that Potato Jet rushes his videos, which is understandable because he needs to get a lot of videos out weekly, but that results to some of his videos just being very poor representations of the product he is showcasing. Case and point, his Red Komodo "review". Thanks for the video!

@hbp_

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6SbwZeaqa-3e9o.html

Loved this!

TELL EM! 🙌🏾🙌🏾

I’m glad there is another point. I just saw potato jets video

Fabulous ✌🏼

Can u suggest some diopters for medium and close up shots using the 50,35,24 mm sirui anamorphic lenses . I don't want to worry about figuring out what to change the desqueez setting to get the proper look.

I also De-de squeezed it sometimes when the "mums" effect got very apparent. wow...many people do videos on that topic all off the sudden, right? Like Media Division. But you are the "OG" with that topic :)

This the second video I’ve seen of yours coming at potato’s. Okay I’m subbed now

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

Second? Maybe you've seen it twice? hahaha.

Great response.

Thanks brother

I love each and every video of yours but I also love Gene’s videos. I got to say I felt uncomfortable when I was watching his review and I hoped that you could clarify about the lenses and I am thankful You did! thank you very much!

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! I've watched a lot more of Gene's stuff since then and I admire his passion. :)

Whew! I just bought one and then, a week later saw the Potato video, buyers remorse ensued. So, I appreciate your voice of reason here. I am a little more at ease now, just need to get a great shot with it for the full cure

He has the best way of testing this lens right behind him: The circular poster on the wall! Shoot this in the centre of the frame then the edges a measure if the horizontal compression is different!

hahahaa man i think Potato is entertaining AF, but i LOVE this video! "Entertainment value">facts/research in his channel i guess. He does have an episode interviewing a guy from Arri which is pretty great.

Very good!

I watched that video and wanted to ask about that "warping" effect

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

Did I answer it here?

@MarkAfterDark

3 жыл бұрын

@@AnamorphicOnABudget yeah I think so. Also as someone who owns the Anamorphot-50 1.33x I raised my eyebrows a bit when he trash-talked them. It works incredibly well for my setup.

It really bothers me when people talk about ‘faking the anamorphic look’ and are connoting to the flares. The ‘anamorphic look’ is the field of view you get from a cylindrical lens versus a spherical lens. That’s the look, the flares are simply a byproduct.

@AnamorphicOnABudget

3 жыл бұрын

I don't super agree with this, but I don't think I'll be able to change your mind. :P

Hi tanks for your video. Would like to talk about stabilisation in anamorphic. Do you think that the new Sony “gyro” stabilisation works with Sirui anamorphic? I think it should. But is my thought. Tanks for your opinion in advanced.

That's my kind of reaction video. 😂

I have XT4 and sirui 50mm and Stabilization working so well

@baycas

9 ай бұрын

That stabilization, did you set it to 50mm or to its spherical counterpart, which is about 31-32mm?

I bought a SonyA7 and looking to buy my first lens , it’s mainly just to shoot movies, which lens do you recommend I buy first , I really like the price of the 24mm sirui, but like the flexibility of DZO 20-55 but I love the look of anamorphic, and Sony being full frame I’ve come to learn probably wasn’t the camera I should have bought?

Master Tito❤️

I am new to anamorphic. Do the Sirui anamorphic lenses work best on a micro four thirds sensor, or on an APS-C sensor....? Or are they just different with field of view, due to the difference between the sensor size between 4/3rds and APS_C? I do like the anamorphic look, and trying to decide between the two systems of either micro four thirds, or an APS-C type camera.

@AnamorphicOnABudget

2 жыл бұрын

Just different fields of view. They'll work great with either. :)

A side note john wick did not use a streak filter. They actually used an older technique of using fishing wires.

@AnamorphicOnABudget

2 жыл бұрын

Fishing line is pretty much the same as a streak filter! Here's ARRI's take on it: www.arri.com/news-en/master-anamorphics-on-john-wick-ii-

@C.C.Cope220

2 жыл бұрын

@@AnamorphicOnABudget yep! Expect these were internal versus being at the front. (Since Dan likes to use rear filters for effects like pro mists) also I just find it cooler when a large budget will still employ diy techniques. (Or this case ask ARRI to do it for you)

Gh5 can work anamorphic mode in differemnt codecs ,right ; So other models of panasonic ; So we have 'light chase' around scenes..and a lot of reframing during directions accord to the plan of each project..and 'restrictions' -kind of not so close or too far of the main subject so it cannot disform it- of budget anamorphic lenses we can have or borrow for the shooting.. What is the simplest solution that has more work in post; Is the Panasonic mirrorless a solution close to the result of budget anamorphic lenses or each choice gives a different perpective and aesthetic; Nice job and greetings from Greece..