Anish Chari makes a good point. Technically I should have put 0 as a digit in the multiplication table, or mention that 0 is a possibility for the single digit. The option of 0 does get excluded later when since there are multiple pairs with products ending in 0, and their sums are different. So 0 could not have been one of the digits.

@jamesvallejo9422

2 жыл бұрын

I thought this was accounted for with the fact that the last digit of the product is the same as a house number, which cannot be zero as house numbers mist be positive integers (not including 0)

@Smallpriest

2 жыл бұрын

@@sewingmachine5467 its not that bryan doesn't remember his house number, its that WE don't know, but it doesn't matter because the sum will add up to 10 either way

@Smallpriest

2 жыл бұрын

@@sewingmachine5467 the video doesn't say that both numbers were his house number, but instead that there were 2 possibilities 21 and 9, obviously bryan would know whether its actually 21 or 9 because its his house, but whether his house number is 21 or 9, in either case the sum of the 2 numbers the girl is thinking of would add up to 10

@mrunluckyguy1741

2 жыл бұрын

@@sewingmachine5467 he knows it(we don't) but whatever it is, the sum is 10

@MrPerfs

2 жыл бұрын

Is 0 really a single digit number though? I mean 00 and 01 aren't two digit numbers. It seems to me that we define an N-digit number based on where the highest non-zero digit is...

You got me. I couldn't get past "but Bryan knows his house number and I don't". The second you started eliminating cases I face-palmed.

@yasseindahshan3556

Жыл бұрын

I was able to solve it. I am very happy.

I thought for sure you were going to point out, "Since Avery said 'the LAST DIGIT' of their product is the same as your house number", then the product must have more than one digit.

@pedrogarcia8706

2 жыл бұрын

I had the same thought

@Aiden-xn6wo

2 жыл бұрын

That's not a valid argument. The last digit of 9 is 9.

@pedrogarcia8706

2 жыл бұрын

@@Aiden-xn6wo but no one would specify the last digit when there's only one digit. It's not a thing anyone would say

@bificommander7472

2 жыл бұрын

I thought the same. But that assumption makes the problem unsolvable (21,27 and 63 would all be possible if 3 and 7 don't count, and this gives different sums), I figured single digits must be allowed.

@The14Some1

2 жыл бұрын

The same! I'm very dissapointed for such inaccuracy.

No matter how advanced you get in mathematics, sometimes you just forget 1*7=7 for about 5 minutes.

@30forlife69

2 жыл бұрын

Ikr

@tooru

2 жыл бұрын

no?

@kshitijsingh2412

2 жыл бұрын

😅 i also forgot about this but Tried the problem again and Solved the problem

@ChrisLee-yr7tz

2 жыл бұрын

I got right to the end of the problem and decided that 3 + 7 was 12 and couldn't see how to decide if the pair was 1 and 9 or 3 and 7.... it is 4am but clearly I'm brain dead.

@kindreon

2 жыл бұрын

My condolences, I solute you for doing math in the morning.

Presh: Here's a logic puzzle! Also Presh: Let's brute force through all the possibilities!

@tomriddle2257

2 жыл бұрын

Next logic puzzle: Name all 3-digit prime numbers!

@Tingletonttu

2 жыл бұрын

That's a perfectly valid method for finite sets.

@quixotix9540

2 жыл бұрын

@@Tingletonttu would be nice if there was a more elegant solution

@savitakumari7430

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fo2mlrSPlpjbddo.html

@hassanalihusseini1717

2 жыл бұрын

@@quixotix9540 It was elegant so....

Well, that went right over my head. Hats off to the 11 year old who got that question right.

@ValkyRiver

2 жыл бұрын

Now, consider other bases.

@noobgamedev8621

2 жыл бұрын

Hehe

@kawsarjahan7282

Жыл бұрын

I am 11 years

@ColinRichardson

Жыл бұрын

@@kawsarjahan7282 joined when you were six?

@ynagqi

Жыл бұрын

@@ColinRichardson probably a parent's account

i love puzzles like this... where the fact that someone definitively figured it out is the key to figuring it out yourself

this is a great puzzle, love the reasoning involved, thanks for sharing

I was a bit confused by the reference to a last digit. I thought that meant the product had to have two digits. But since that left the problem unsolvable (3 and 7 aren't eliminated as housenumbers), I got to the answer in the end.

@royal_zaffreknightx3445

2 жыл бұрын

I also thought the same, because no one would mention ‘last digit’ if the product is 9 (single digit). Then again they could have just asked for the number, not the sum of digits.

@tonyhaddad1394

2 жыл бұрын

100% agree (my answer was the same , for the same reason)

@tubular618

2 жыл бұрын

Same here. It was a bit deceptive but I got the right answer by including 1 and 9 as the last digit, since their factors both add up to 10.

@medexamtoolsdotcom

2 жыл бұрын

If you made a friend and he took you to walmart and then you pulled out a gun and robbed the place, and then the next day you asked him if he could take you back to walmart, and he said "No way, the last time I brought you to walmart you pulled out a gun and robbed the place!", would you then say "that's not true, you only took me to Walmart once"?

@mikee6666

2 жыл бұрын

@@medexamtoolsdotcom That's a sound argument on the surface. But it's false equivalency. It's a logic puzzle; "last digit" means there's more than one digit. Given that brings up an error when working out the problem, it has to be concluded the problem was worded incorrectly to start with.

What gets me about this problem is the phrasing "the *last* digit of the product" - you don't say last unless there's more than 1 (well, outside of the saying "this is the first and last time I/you ____"). So that makes me think the product *HAS* to be two digits - but then that gives three possible number pairs: 3&7, 3&9, and 7&9. Since they don't add up to the same sum, that means the problem is unsolvable if you go by that logic.

@florenciacecilia6942

2 жыл бұрын

I was going to answer the same thing

@Dont_Tread_On_Me

2 жыл бұрын

This was my answer as well

@badrunnaimal-faraby309

2 жыл бұрын

If you're playing a "guess my numbers" game and the product was a single digit, would you just give that away? I think this would fit fine with the other exceptions.

@Rainbowmon

2 жыл бұрын

@@badrunnaimal-faraby309 I saw another comment (or a reply to another comment) that mentioned a better way to phrase it: "the product's *last OR only* digit". Gets rid of any confusion without revealing the answer.

@williamwilliam4944

Жыл бұрын

@@Rainbowmon the last digit of a 1 digit number is just that 1 digit. If I ask you for a $20 bill, and you tell me "this is the last $20 bill I ever got from my workplace", I could make no inference about how many $20 bills you have, just that the one you're giving me is the last one you received.

I was so close to solving this. I found that the last digits 1 and 9 only appear twice, which is okay because multiplication is commutative. So, yep, all I had to do was backtrack where the 1 and 9 came from and I would've had the answer. But instead, out of foolishness, I added them for some reason and it somehow happened to be 10 and I was correct out of luck. I found something by luck. The sum of the last digits of 21 and 9 is also 10.

Since Avery said “the last digit”, one would assume that they were referring to a double digit number, so 21. However, you’re right: they could have been mean and pedantic and meant 9, since the last digit of 9 is 9.

@garethhall4067

2 жыл бұрын

My first thought was based on this reasoning

@savitakumari7430

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fo2mlrSPlpjbddo.html

@irrelevant_noob

Жыл бұрын

Huh, do you know any mathematically-inclined people like Avery and Bryan who *_aren't_* "mean and pedantic"? xD

I was thinking like this -->Bryan is sure about the fact that the last digit is unique in the sense that it does not appear twice as the product of distinct numbers like 8.7=56 and 4.9=36 -->since both the digits are distinct so our range is from 0 to 72(9.8). --->Now numbers ending with the digit 1 are {1,11,21,31,41,51,61,71} 1 can be discarded using the fact that both the numbers are distinct and 31,41,61,71 can be discarded as the numbers are primes and 51=3.17 so it can also be discarded leaving us with the only possibility of 21=3*7. --->Now numbers ending with digit 9 are {09,19,29,39,49,59,69} out of these 19,29,59 are primes 39=3*13 49=7*7 leaving us with the only possibility of 09(1.9) and numbers ending with other digits can be discarded easily using counter examples as follows 0 can be discarded {10,20} 2 can be discarded {02,12} 3 can be discarded {03,63} 4 can be discarded {04,24} 5 can be discarded {05,15} 6 can be discarded {06,16} 7 can be discarded {07,27} 8 can be discarded {08,28}.

It's fun, few months ago I wouldn't be able to solve it but thanks those vids you make, I did it!

The numbers are 3 and 7. And the sum is 10. They are the only different numbers which product ends in 1. Edit: I didn't consider 1 and 9 were possible solutions too.

@bigJovialJon

2 жыл бұрын

Either way the sum is 10 (the answer that matters)

@Daniel_Poirot

2 жыл бұрын

I actually mistakenly ignored the case "3 + 7", but found "1 + 9". Great minds think alike. 😀

@racool911

2 жыл бұрын

Same lmao

@shefali6599

2 жыл бұрын

i thought that since the question says last digit, i assumed the product to be a 2 digit number so 3 and 7 makes sense , but anyways answer matters here that is 10. :)

@PauIdenino

2 жыл бұрын

LOOOL you didn't consider 1 and 9 LOOOL

For every pair of digits, there is another pair made up of their respective 10s complements. e.g. 2,7 and 8,3. The product of these pairs can be written as a•b and (10-a)•(10-b) respectively, which has the same last digit, the last digit of a•b. Any pair where the complementary pair is not itself leads to ambiguity, so they can be ruled out. What's left are the pairs that contain 10s complements themselves, so their sum would be, trivially, 10. Insight: 10 is the mean of 3 (1+2) and 17 (8+9), the minimum and maximum sums of two unique non-zero digits. Once you see the symmetry, the proof isn't too hard.

@sillymel

2 жыл бұрын

Wow, I was wondering if doing this puzzle in other bases would always lead to solution equal to the base, and I guess this means it would (assuming the puzzle _has_ a solution in that base, of course). Sweet.

@kevinmartin7760

2 жыл бұрын

I think I observed the same thing, only visually. The reverse diagonals on the chart are lines of constant sum. Each time he marked a group of numbers (having a common last digit) for elimination, you could see the pattern of placement of these numbers was symmetric along the reverse diagonal associated with the sum of 10. Any placement of numbers that included values off this diagonal would perforce have several different sums and so only a pattern contained entirely within that diagonal could be a solution, meaning the solution had to be 10. Turning this observation into algebra would give your result. Strangely, though, 3×7 was my first guess and turned out to be one of the correct ways of forming 10.

@FromTheMountain

2 жыл бұрын

This is a wonderful solution, much more elegant than brute-forcing through all the possibilities!

@Amanda-C.

2 жыл бұрын

There's a shorter proof without touching the mean of 3 and 17. The product of the complements is 100 - 10(a+b) + ab, which, clearly, has the same final digit as ab (i.e., ab is equivalent, mod 10). Also simpler to handle with other bases than 10. Great insight to start with, though.

@JayakrishnanNairOmana

2 жыл бұрын

much better explanation than the video, really nice.

I realised 9 was the only product ending in 9 I didn’t consider 21 but I still got the correct answer of 10 so I’m happy

@simonvanprooijen

2 жыл бұрын

Nice I got exactly the opposite, didn't realise the 9, but thought of 21

@reeck771

2 жыл бұрын

@@simonvanprooijen because all the other prime numbers were still on the board, except 1

@oneoranota

2 жыл бұрын

You should not be happy. Missing a crucial detail means your reasoning is wrong and you found the right answer by luck.

@vez3834

2 жыл бұрын

@@oneoranota Or he got to the answer without using a multiplication table, but rather did it in his head with the correct thought process. Like I did. He is the one who decides whether to be happy about his result or not. Saying it was luck is possibly missing crucial details, meaning your reasoning is wrong.

@simonvanprooijen

2 жыл бұрын

@@oneoranota cry

Even as a self-professed armchair logician, it seems I still have a long way to go in mastering the art of logic. I spent a good few minutes trying to work out the the minimum and maximum sums possible before realising I was supposed to be working out the products.

I applied fact that multiple pairs have the same sum earlier, which made solving this significantly easier to do and understand. The sums are constant over the diagonals (bottom left to top right, so 5+4=6+3), and the last digits are symmetrical with regard to the diagonal going through 9*1. So the solution must be on the symmetry axis and we don't even need to consider which house numbers are possible.

I remember this type of question when I was in grade 7. I was bad at the actual method so I just jammed 9 in everything.

When Avery said, "The last digit of their product is the same as your house number," it's reasonable to infer that the product has more than one digit. For example if Avery's numbers were 9 and 1, would he really say "the LAST digit of the product is the same as your house number"? With that in mind we have three possibilities: There's only one way to get a product ending in 3 (9x7, with a sum of 16), and only one way to get a product ending in 7 (9x3, with a sum of 12), and only one way to get a product ending in 1 (7x3, with a sum of 10). Knowing his own house number, Bryan can solve the puzzle, but we cannot know which of the three possibilities to choose.

@AkshatSehgal

2 жыл бұрын

This was exactly the solution I got to. Also, an additional assumption I made after eliminating all single digit products (correctly or not) is that I eliminated all numbers with 0 as the second digit, since 0 is not used as a house number almost anywhere (of course there could be a extremely rare instance somewhere). In any case, those numbers get eliminated later since they’re not unique.

@volodymyrgandzhuk361

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, he would. There's no reason to say that 9 is NOT the last digit of 9, or that 9 has NO last digit.

@jorgehuertas3995

2 жыл бұрын

@@volodymyrgandzhuk361 Since the definition of last is: "coming after all others in time or order; final" and there are no other numbers. 9 is not the last digit of 9.

@volodymyrgandzhuk361

2 жыл бұрын

@@jorgehuertas3995 it's not? What is it then? Or maybe 9 has no last digit? Even your definition says "coming after ALL OTHERS", in plural, and by this logic, there have to be at least 3 digits

@jorgehuertas3995

2 жыл бұрын

@@volodymyrgandzhuk361 Indeed, 9 has no last digit since it's a single item

Wait , for 11 year olds? So , if i dont success, i am metally not even 11 years old? 😐

@romangonzalezadrianmaurici6302

2 жыл бұрын

well, actually some problems are easier to younger ones because they don´t have a lot of information on their heads and have a lot of neural plasticity, that is why there are kids that can play chess better than most adults. So it is normal that this problems are hard to adults.

@bruhwantedboosiefade69

2 жыл бұрын

this is olympiad question

@savitakumari7430

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fo2mlrSPlpjbddo.html

I continue to LOVE your videos! I hope you never stop.

My line of thinking was thus: The digits must both be odd, since having either or both of them as even would mean the product must be even. If the product is even, there are too many possible combinations for Bryan to be certain which two digits were used (eg a final digit of 2 could indicate a product of 12, which could be reached by 2x6 or 3x4, or a product of 32 (4x8). A final digit of 4 could be reached by 6x4 or 3x8, 6 could be reached by 2x3 or 2x8, 8 could be 2x4 or 2x9, and 0 could be 0xAnything, or any even multiple of 5). Thus both digits must be odd. Similarly, we can rule out the number 5 because any odd multiple of 5 will be 5, so there is no way for Bryan to determine what the other multiplier could be. That leaves us with the possibilities of 1, 3, 7 and 9. This works out to be possible products of: 1x3 = 3 1x7 = 7 1x9 = 9 3x7 = 21 3x9 = 27 7*9 = 63 Removing products that have the same final digit, this leaves: 1x9 = 9 3x7 = 21 Since Avery specifies the *last* digit of the product, logically the answer must be 3x7, and Bryan lives at house number 1.

I don't know if it's been mentioned yet in the comments, but I'd assume that the phrase "last digit of their product" implies that the correct numbers would have a product greater than or equal to 10. This would make 3 and 7 the more correct answer of the two choices even if they have the same sum as 1 and 9.

@Fexghadi

2 жыл бұрын

But if you remove 2-to-9 from the possible solutions, there are other possibilities than 21 that are no longer eliminated by single-digit answers. Like 63, which only gets eliminated thanks to the presence of 3.

@medexamtoolsdotcom

2 жыл бұрын

Then you would assume wrong. If I gave you one penny with the date "1986" on it and then asked you what the date on the last penny I gave you, would you say "your question makes no sense, because saying the last penny you gave me implies you gave me more than 1 penny!" No it doesn't. Saying the last of something doesn't mean there was ever more than 1 of them.

@mikee6666

2 жыл бұрын

@@medexamtoolsdotcom In that scenario, I'd have a go at you for using such poor grammar. :-) Asking what the date was on "the last penny I gave you" would indicate you had given me more than one penny, which would be false and make no sense. Correct grammar would have you using the definite article to correctly refer to the singular - "What is the date on THE penny I gave you?" As part of a logic puzzle, "last digit" means there is more than one digit.

@Fexghadi

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikee6666 Semantically though, "last digit" or "last penny" are still correct. You are *ASSUMING* there is more than one based on general human understanding and conventions, and that's a fair assumption of course, but just like when your parents would say "last warning" even though it was the first, and also the last, is also correct.

@mikee6666

2 жыл бұрын

@@Fexghadi That was what I was explaining though - semantically the term "last penny" indicates there was a preceding penny for the "last penny" to follow, just as the term "last digit" indicates there is more than one digit. The assumption of there being more than one digit is based on the definition of the word "last". If whoever wrote out the puzzle did not intend for term "last digit" to mean more than one digit, then they made an incorrect choice of words. What you're saying is correct. If the term "last digit" is assumed to mean more than one digit, then the puzzle becomes unsolvable using the method demonstrated. Fortunately, as others in the comments section have shown, there are other ways of solving the problem that don't break the "last digit" logic.

Only problem with this is the phrasing of Avery’s last statement. That the _last_ digit exists implies there is more than one digit in the product, completely eliminating 1 from potentially being one of the numbers (and also 2,3 or 2,4 as solutions). Thus, 1, 3, or 7 could all be Bryan’s house number, which gives 3 options for solutions (3,7 or 3,9 or 7,9) and no way to exclude any of them.

@cigmorfil4101

2 жыл бұрын

Why? With a single digit result of multiplication the first digit and the last digit are just exactly the same digit - the only digit of the result. When the first person in a queue starts a queue of people are they in a queue or not? After all, there is, at this stage, only 1 person in the queue. Others join the queue behind the _last_ person in a queue, so if there is only 1 person waiting (the _first_ person in the queue) can they join the queue? If there is a sign "only the first person in the queue will be served" does that mean if only 1 person is waiting in the queue they will not be served until there is at least one other person in the queue?

@ospreytalon8318

2 жыл бұрын

@@cigmorfil4101 That's not comparable to the question's context. If Bryan lived at number 9, Avery has essentially said "the last digit of the product of my numbers is your house number" Why wouldn't Avery just say "the product of my numbers is your house number" in that case?

@cigmorfil4101

2 жыл бұрын

@@ospreytalon8318 But it is comparable to the understanding of "last". The reason being that this is a mathematic (sic) problem which has a unique solution which can be deduced from the given, sparse, information. Perhaps you would be happier to have final clue given as "the product modulus 10 is equal to your house number"? But how many people other than mathematicians would use that phraseology? Again "the units digit of the product..." is also a mouthful that is not really used in everyday speech. Perhaps we need to get a survey done of 11 year olds to ask them what they think the last digit of a number is. Just to point out, both those alternative versions are actually incorrect: the two different single digit numbers of which I'm thinking are .1 and .9 and multiplying them together gives .09 - there is nothing to say the two single digit *numbers* are *whole* numbers, and a leading zero (before the decimal point) isn't counted as its presence or not makes no difference to the value of the number, just like 09 and 9 both have the same value. And if the two single digit numbers are .1 and 9 the product is .9

@savitakumari7430

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fo2mlrSPlpjbddo.html

I thought it was a little ambiguous because "the last digit of the product" implies at least a 2 digit number.

@ninesquared81

2 жыл бұрын

Why so? The last digit of a single digit number is just the number itself.

@hans-rudigerdrzimmermann

2 жыл бұрын

You are right , if the last digit is the same as the first digit it is a mistake. The last implies a series of numbers and not a single number.

@ninesquared81

2 жыл бұрын

@@hans-rudigerdrzimmermann a sequence can have one, or even zero elements. All that having a 'last' element implies is that there is at least *one* element in it, but that's only because we assert that's there's an element in there for us to pick out.

@mikee6666

2 жыл бұрын

Having "last" as a qualifier indicates pluralism; you can only have a "last digit" if there is a preceding digit.

@ninesquared81

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikee6666 that simply isn't true, if we're being as precise and mathematical as possible with our language. I accept that casually, speaking of a 'last' item usually suggests that there are at least three items, but mathematically, there need be only one to find a 'last' item, as I explained above.

Impressed by whoever came up with this puzzle!

I don't like this question, because "the last digit of the product is equal to your house number" carries the implication that the product has more than one digit (else Avery would simply say "the product is your house number"). Working under the assumption that the house number has two digits, hence ruling out all the single digits at the start, leaves 7x9=63 (sum 16) and 3x9=27 (sum 12) on the board, with no correct answer to the problem. Instead, Avery should say "the last or only digit of the product is equal to your house number"

@motogstylus3260

2 жыл бұрын

This was my thought as well. Even saying "the ones digit is equal to your house number" would be enough to prevent ruling out single digit products. Given the language that was presented I automatically ruled out single digit products which left me with several possibilities but no definitive answer.

@volodymyrgandzhuk361

2 жыл бұрын

First, "the last digit" does not automatically imply there are several digits. Second, the product can be 3·7=21, which has two digits.

@ospreytalon8318

2 жыл бұрын

@@volodymyrgandzhuk361 First, yes that's exactly what it does. Second, the options for _3 are 3 and 63 (check the table yourself if you want). If you immediately discard all single digit numbers because of the misleading wording of the question, you are left with just 63 ending in 3. This is then a valid result to the problem (in addition to 21 and also 27) but the sum of digits is no longer the same

@RamInChennai

2 жыл бұрын

This was exactly my thought too. By this logic, we have other combinations like 3,9 and 7,9. Hence could not decipher the answer uniquely

@volodymyrgandzhuk361

2 жыл бұрын

@@ospreytalon8318 no, it doesn't, even if literally, it seems like it should. It just means "the digit at the very right". But it doesn't automatically mean that there has to be another digit before it. Misleading wording? I have some news for you, many math problems are "misleading" by your definition, because the only other alternative would be to give away what one could find by reasoning. Would you also say that if there's a multiple-choice question and the last option is "none of the above", this implies that there actually exists an answer (different to all the given ones)?

When he says "the last digit...", doesn't it mean that there's more than 1 digits? So the product is a two digit number which gives us only 1 solution. Thoughts anyone?

@ashleylentz2651

2 жыл бұрын

Fully agree. A failure on Presh's part, imnsho

@tooru

2 жыл бұрын

It doesn't mean that at all. Last digit of number 6 is 6.

@SgtSupaman

2 жыл бұрын

In real life, that would be a good conclusion to draw from their word choice. In a math problem, it doesn't matter. A single digit still technically has a first and last digit (even though the first is the last) and these word problems will use that kind of wording/technicality to be intentionally vague.

@jancermak1988

2 жыл бұрын

It is irrelevant. Queistion is what is the sum of numbers. It is 10 and does not matter whitch pair of numbers give this result.

@gq7435

2 жыл бұрын

@@jancermak1988 but it does matter which pair gives the result. The product of those two has "last" digit same as Bryan's house number.

The first problem in this channel I've been able to completly solve!

The coolest puzzle ever I've ever seen on this channel

Ah, I had interpreted "last digit" as implying that the product had more than one digit, hence I could eliminate all products that resulted in only a single digit. This left both 3*9 (product 27, sum 12) and 7*9 (product 63, sum 16) as being potentially solvable by Bryan, but had eliminated 1*9 since it did not produce a 2-digit number.

@jasonmdt

2 жыл бұрын

Same...

@bend.manevitz8261

2 жыл бұрын

Same, but also 7*3 (product 21, sum 10). (9*9) mod 10 is also 1, but because of the "different number" requirement, that wasn't in consideration.

"What if the last digit was equal to zero - that was Bryan's house number." Yes, yes - let's give this possibility the same consideration.

@goldenwarrior1186

2 жыл бұрын

What if Bryan’s house number was 10, 20, or any other multi-digit number that ends in a 0

Really, incredible puzzle. Happy New Year 2022. Please, keep educating us all with these types of puzzles in this year and ahead with good health, joy and wealth. Happy New Year Sir Ji🙏🙏🙏.

I used the fact that ou writing system is base 10, so i eliminated all of the divisors(2, 5,1) and every even number(since if you multiplied it by 5, you would get a number ending in 0), this left 1,3,7 and 9, 3*9 and 7*1 AND 3*1 and 7*9 have the same last digit, so it was only left with 1*9 or 3*7, and their sum would be 10

Hi Presh, thanks for your postings, I'm a fan! I finally made solving this one but it took me some time. There's misleading information in the wording of this riddle. A says to B: "The last digit of the product is your house number". For me, this information does imply that the product of the two numbers MUST have two digits. If eliminating any product being only one digit there are three possible solutions: 3*7=21, last digit 1, 3*9=27, last digit 7, and 7*9=63, last digit 3. Each of the last digits are unique in the table, and each sum of the ones mentioned is different - so there would be 3 different solutions. After ignoring the thought the product HAS to be two digits and involving the one digit options I finally could solve it :)

I miss Alice and Bob. I guess Avery and Brian does the job too :)

Fantastic. Loved this puzzle. very ingenius.

While working this out mentally, a helpful trick for me was to rule out all of the even numbers first (starting with zero) as Bryan's house number; then rule out 5, because these 6 options appear in so many products. This left only 4 choices and made it a lot easier to figure out without writing notes... which was helpful because I stink at keeping track of very many things at once without paper.

Although he may have implicitly done so, I feel he needs to have also checked the sums of the numbers before eliminating them. For example, there may have been multiple pairs of numbers that had different products (all of which ended in 6, but were 16, 36, etc.) but their sums could have all been the same. This is easily checked (they would all have to lie on the same SW/NE diagonal, as 21 and 9 do), but it seems like he missed as step in his elimination process.

@pumaconcolor2855

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah he should have mentioned this aspect, I think you should be able to show it cannot be if the number is 5 or smaller, since the smaller product of two different integers is 2*3. There could be a more rigorous way to show that it cannot happen for even numbers in general, but they all show at least twice in the same column meaning that the related sums cannot be equal in all cases.

@irrelevant_noob

Жыл бұрын

@@pumaconcolor2855 although... the smallest product of two different integers is 0*1. And Presh also neglected to include the case where one of the 1-digit number was 0; even if that would get eliminated just like the other 7 digits with multiple products in the table, it should've been done..

@holomurphy22

Жыл бұрын

The couples of equal sums are on the lines parallel to the y=x axis. So you can visually tell if they all have equal sums or not.

Wow! Such a fantastic logical puzzle!!!

@mustafizrahman2822

2 жыл бұрын

Einstein!

@jimmykitty

2 жыл бұрын

@@mustafizrahman2822 pam..

@mustafizrahman2822

2 жыл бұрын

@@jimmykitty no paam. Truee always true.

@jimmykitty

2 жыл бұрын

@@mustafizrahman2822 Sobai tmr moto na..

@mustafizrahman2822

2 жыл бұрын

@@jimmykitty Ha eita shotto bolso. Shobai amar moto posa satro na.

The *last* digit of the product, would imply that the product is more than 10, which would exclude the number 9 - otherwise the wording should be "the digit of the product is the same as your house number"

@volodymyrgandzhuk361

2 жыл бұрын

It doesn't imply anything. The last digit of 9 is 9. It's also its only digit, but being the only digit, it doesn't stop being the last digit.

This is the first one of this guy's puzzles I've been able to solve on my own

I failed this one because when I heard "last digit of their product", I assumed the product had to have at least two digits. 🙁

The answer to the question ,"Can you guess the sum?" is yes. I can ALWAYS guess the sum. Whether I can work it out is another matter. And whether I can guess correctly in a few attempts is another. Good maths, poor question.

@robertveith6383

2 жыл бұрын

In a "Pink Panther" movie, Inspector Clouseau asked a stranger if he knew what time it was. The stranger said, "Yes."

@bb2fiddler

2 жыл бұрын

The question is posed as a conversation between adolescents... Can u chill tf out

You have to draw the table to look at and check, it's too complicated if we don't have a pen and paper. My solution is that all digit numbers x (except 1) can be the production of 1 and x, so, if x is also the last digit of another production of two different numbers, we can eliminate x. For example, 2=1*2, but 2 also the last digit of 12 and 12=2*6, then we can eliminate 2. 3 is the last digit of 7*9=63, 4 is the last digit of 4*6=24 and so on. Check this rule for all 10 digits and we have only 1 and 9 are remaining. For 1, we have 7*3, for 9 we have 1*9 and 10 is the common sum.

@chillmode1881

2 жыл бұрын

I solved it without pen and paper. Did it all in my head. :D

I’m surprised I was able to figure this one out. I did an inverse approach to the multiplication table where I started by saying the house number is x, then seeing if there was more than one way to get a product with last digit x (I didn’t brute force this but just knew from experience/logic I could eliminate the 2-8). Leaving me with 21 and 9. I did mistakenly go the extra step by assuming the “last digit” statement meant it had to be 21, because 9 only has one digit and it would be strange to call that it’s last digit. However, this still lead to me to the correct sum 7+3=10

I eliminated the row of the 1's because no one says the last digit of your number when talking about a one-digit number. That left 21 as the only possibility of 3 and 7.

@jordanbrock8856

2 жыл бұрын

Or 63: 9&7

@Jukka70

2 жыл бұрын

@@jordanbrock8856 good point

3:30 I don't agree that 7 can be eliminated, because Avery specifically says "the last digit of their product" implying their product is a multi-digit number. That means that if Brian lived on number 7, and interpreted "last digit" to imply a 2-digit number, then we can't say whether the result is 21 (i.e. 7+3=10) or 27 (i.e. 9+3=12). My conclusion is that this problem cannot be solved with the information given.

That was fun : )! Thank you : )! Happy New Year : )!

The trouble here, is that the wording "The Last Digit" implies at least TWO digits. Which means you would eliminate all of the multiples of 1. That means that 21, 63, and 27, house numbers 1,3, and 7 respectively, are all unique. Without knowing which one is his, we get three possible answers: 10, 12, and 16.

@mindtwist4738

Жыл бұрын

"The Last Digit" does not imply that there are at least two digits. The last digit of a one-digit-number is simply the number itself

@llywyllngryffyn8053

Жыл бұрын

@@mindtwist4738 I will admit that your math skills are exemplary, but your English might need some work. Last in a sequence of one is also the first but since first and last are contradictory, like any other double negative, they are omitted. Give me three examples in English where a single object of no sequence is referred to as the last object. If you saw a single person at the bus stop, you wouldn't ask them if they were the 'last one there' since you saw no one else. If you did, they would likely reply 'Only one' unless there had been others who had gotten onto other busses... but then, that would have been a sequence.

I would say this puzzle has no valid solution. There is nothing saying that the two numbers are non-negative. So every last digit appears in at least two products, a * b and a * -b. But that still gives no solution since a + b = a - b ⇔ b = 0 which implies that a * b = 0 but a house number can't be zero (and also zero appears as the last digit in more than one product).

@shefali6599

2 жыл бұрын

Key here is that Bryan in the end figured it out the sum, and that's where it can be known that it has a valid solution :)

@emiltonklinga3035

2 жыл бұрын

​@@shefali6599 But that is what I mean he can't do. If his house number was either 1 or 9, the sum could be -10, -8, -4, 4, 8 or 10. In general, for any house number he lives on, there are at least two different sums.

I took Last digit to mean it was a 2 digit number, so I ruled out 1.

@volodymyrgandzhuk361

2 жыл бұрын

But either way the answer is the same!

I realize what Avery said is "the same number as your house". It means that you can have x² or ²√x if you multiply the same number on one diagonal side. And cross out the diagonal places or you can say crossing out the hypotenuse places because this table has a right angle and it is a scalene triangle that has a right angle. After all, you can multiply the same number more like repeated multiplication. So that is nice logic.

Really enjoyed this one!

As an 11 year old, im glad that i was able to solve it pretty quickly

I disagree in part with this solution. A single digit product has no "last digit." Only two digit products can have a last digit. Therefore 3+7 is the only correct sim.

@Shreyy17

2 жыл бұрын

At first I thought of it too. But then you can write 9 as 09 too. But yeah. 7 and 3 would be many people's choice..

@MFESPFTWKF

2 жыл бұрын

A single digit number has a last digit of itself I disagree with you

@darrorpsk6148

2 жыл бұрын

You are the first and the last in a group of one. I don't see why digits would be any different. A single digit product absolutely has a last digit unless you want to pretend that English words are more rigorous than math definitions...and English words don't really have a good track record for being that consistent, so that wouldn't be wise.

@benjaminpavard7332

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shreyy17 in 09, 0 isn't taken as a significant digit. since its presence doesn't alter the original value. as a result you cant use that reasoning here

@ruinman7665

2 жыл бұрын

If there is no house numbered with 0 then Avery was joking on Brian bc he's a bum

Solve it by: 1. Since 1 x n = n, and the two numbers are different, then all digits except 1 must consist of at least one combination of the numbers. 2. Since 2 x n is an even number, then all even digits are eliminated. 3. Since the last digit of 5 x n is either 0 or 5, 5 is eliminated (0 is already eliminated). 4. Just check for the last digit of 3x7, 3x9, and 7x9, 3x7=21, 3x9=27, 7x9=63. So 3 and 7 are eliminated. 5. This gives the last digit is either 1 or 9, which consists of 3x7=21 or 1x9=9. Either of these results in the sum 10.

Working out before I watch the video: 3-17, are the possible starting sums. 0 and 5 can be eliminated as house numbers since the second number can't be figured out with all the repeats. 1 seems like it wouldn't be one of the one digit numbers since A said Last digit.

Imagine Brian's house number was 7. Imagine the answer was 9+3 = 12 (9*3=27). Then Avery could have easily given this hint to Brian, as Brian would then deduce that "Last digit" should mean a 2-digit number. We, as external observers, cannot deduce what interpretation they would have followed considering the "last" digit. This could mean the answer could be 10 (is in the video) or 12 (9+3=12; 9*3=27) or 16 (9+7=16; 9*7=63) as they all have unique last digits in the multiplication table.

I managed to get it, I’m happy now, thanks !

Brilliant! I thought it was impossible for sure.

In fact, the question is "can you guess their sum?" and the answer is "the sum of the two different one-digit number is 10". It doesn't matter the house number of Bryan or the fact that the sum of two different one-digit number has two possibilities, the right answer is 10. Thank you for sharing, great puzzle.

Finally, after seing dozens of these videos, I got to solve one!

This was delightful !!

I saw the title to this video and immediately asked everyone in the room “does anyone know where bryan lives”

If you make the assumption that the reference to the *last* digit of his house number means that it must be at least 2 digits long, then their product must be 21 (product of two primes), hence they are 3 and 7 and their sum is 10.

A very fun puzzle that I was, coincidentally, able to solve by using my own house number, which ends in 1. Afterwards, I thought it was more of a "magic number" puzzle, so I tried old house numbers and none of them worked out.

I got the same problem with different story in an Olympiad when I was 13.. Brutal !!

Not sure why we cannot exclude 9 as it would be the only digit and I would not refer to it as "last digit". This should be rephrased to "units digit".

This problem had undeniably a correspondence with the Cheryl's Birthday Problem. I solved it using the same logic i.e. tallying out the dummys. And essentially got 10.

In the multiplication table there is also a last digit symmetry on each side of the lower left to upper right diagonal (a = 10 - b). Any last digit besides the diagonal will appear at least twice. So all valid answers (24, 21, 16, 9) are on that a = 10 - b diagonal, we only need to check if their last digit appears on one side of the diagonal. 4 and 6 do, 1 and 9 do not. ==> Proof for the last digit symmetry around the a = 10 - b diagonal: Each cell (a, b) where a10 - b has a mirror cell (10 - b, 10 - a). Their products are ab and (10 - b)(10 - a). The difference ab - (10 - b)(10 - a) => ab - (10² - 10a - 10 b + ab) => ab - 100 + 10a + 10 b - ab => 10a + 10b - 100. As a and b are whole numbers the difference is always a multiple of 10 so the last digit is the same. That both sums had the same value is no coincidence either. On the diagonal a = 10 - b the sum of a + b is the same as the sum of (10 - b) and b which simplifies to just 10. I really like this problem as it revealed special properties of multiplication tables that greatly reduce the number of results to check.

I missed the part about the two numbers being different at first, but once I had that, I was able to figure it out!

In the problem, you mention that the last digit of the product of the numbers is the same as your house number. I interpret that to mean that that product had two digits -- not just one. I also ruled out the idea that his house number would have been '0' (Who lives in house 0?) This eliminates all single digit products as potential products. Using that logic, we are left with (3,7) to make 21 [house number 1] or a sum of 10, (3,9) to make 27 [house number 7] or a sum of 12, and (7,9) to make 63 [house number 3] with a sum of 16.

21 is the product (only product with 1 at the end), 10 is the sum for this (and 1x9, the only other product with 9 at the end)

Easy but fun! I liked it.

Very good question!

Avery: I am thinking of a two different number, can you guess what are day. Bryan: no I won't Question ended

As Avery had mentioned "last digit", if we consider the Product of the 2 numbers to have 2 digits? This would eliminate 1 as a possible number. Considering only the possibilities of 2-digit products, then the answer would be: 10 -> 3 & 7 if Bryan's house number is 1 OR 12 -> 3 & 9 if Bryan's house number is 7 OR 16 -> 7 & 9 if Bryan's house number is 3.

The sum of the two numbers (10, in either case) is also the sum of his two possible house numbers (9 and 1).

Very nicely done👍

So this generalizes to other bases (although not all bases will have a unique product). If you have two distinct numbers between 0 and one-less-than-the-base ("one-digit numbers"), then the only products that will have a unique last digit are of two numbers that sum to the base. That's because of how negative numbers work in modulus arithmetic. Example, 3*6=-3*-6, but -3*-6=7*4 (mod 10), so 3*6=7*4 (mod 10), meaning they share the last digit in base 10. If the two numbers sum to the base, then one is the negative of the other, so the above trick just gets you the same two numbers in a different order.

I was certain that this would be impossible to solve with given information. Wow!

I have figured out this puzzle on my own, but I have to say that it attributed to long hour viewing on your channels.😁

The key is to find the last digit that occurs only once for all possible products. Since 1x(2..9) = 9x(8..1) mod 10, this eliminates 2 to 8 as last digit, leaving only 1 or 9 as possible last digit. So the product must be odd which means the original 2 digits are both odd and cannot be 5. That leaves only: 1, 3, 7, 9. There are only 2 possible solns: 1x9=9 or 3x7=21. And the sum in either case is 10.

The sum is 10 because the only way he could guess the numbers was if his house number is 1 or 9. If the house number was 1 that would mean the numbers are 3 and 7. If the house number is 9 then the numbers were 1 and 9. Either way the sum is 10. If the house number is anything else there would be no way for him to determine the numbers. It's an easy puzzle, just a bit laborious to list out the possibilities. Fortunately the 2 numbers are interchangeable since multiplication and addition are commutative, otherwise it would be twice as much work.

Fantastic question

The instructions ask if the person solving can guess their sum. It doesn't state correctly guess. Also, what about -3, -7 solution?

I was trying to figure this out, and I did but I thought I was completely wrong. I legitimately thought that the house number clue was something that I was meant to understand but apparently the logic of not knowing got me to the correct answer. Very satisfying even if I’m over the age demographic of this (20 y/o in uni lol)

could also be negative 10.. we aren't sure at all (if you say last two digits can allow for singular digits then two numbers can be negative and validity of house numbers are irrelevant since context clues clearly are unreliable..)

I actually did this the same way but considered to be a possible number as well, so I did this table with 0 as a factor, which meant that 9 was actually the only possible house number for me.

I like how Avery acts like it’s solvable without the hint, like, ”hey, I’m thinking of two random numbers, can you read my mind?”

I figured it out in my head a completely different way using teeth numbering idea. The sum of your opposing teeth is always the same. The sum of opposing numbers 0 to 9 is 10. Find the product that equals the only solution, house number, (not house numbers) is 9. Sum must be 10.

The very first step is to understand from their conversation , is that the product's last digit is UNIQUE, so by just knowing the last digit, one can know what's the solution. Then, note the number 1. It multiplies with all other numbers, and produces as results those numbers themselves(from 2-9). So either 1 is part of the solution, with as yet unknown number, OR if 1 is not part of solution then the result of product can only be 1 (which isn't produced by 1 above) I took the latter option first and found the solution... got lucky a bit.

This was actually very easy for me. Maybe I had luck and tried the right approach at first, but the sum being 10 was very intuitive right away

The number nine has an infinite many preceding zeros (as do all numbers - they represent the zero-quantity of successive powers of ten in the number above the most significant digit). By convention we do not write those zero-digits, but they are there. Therefore, it is valid to say 'the last digit of 9 is 9'. Thus, without knowing Bryan's house number we can still arrive at a valid sum solution. It matters not what the house number is, only that it satisfies one of the two solutions.

The last digit of their product is the house number. Therefore the product should have two digits and therefore 3 and 7 will be the best-suited numbers.

I do feel like a did a lot of work trying to think of every way you could make the sum of 3 to 17, multiplying them and figuring out which one of these had a unique last digit.

Let x and y be two different integers in [1,9]. If x*y ends with the digit z, then (10-x)*(10-y) also end with the digit z. 10-x and 10-y are also two different integers in [1,9], and their sum is 20-(x+y), which is different from x+y iff x+y =/= 10. Thus, if x+y = 10, we can construct two different integers x' and y' in [1,9] such that x'y' has the same last digit than xy, and x+y =/= x'+y'. Thus, the only possibility is x+y = 10. This also shows that the solutions are on the "y=x axis".