Hey guys! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter. (Since youtube is not helping us in terms of views). You will greatly help the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you from all of us

@jasonwebb1882

11 ай бұрын

Did I hear that Earth can not fall or die due to Human activities?? Can we discuss that comment? Man has steam rolled over this planet and it's not slowing down. As long as there is money to be made, this will continue on and on. Now we can kill this planet and we are on the verge of doing so everyday. This has been happening ever since we figured out how to split atoms. The Soviet Union found out just how dangerous a nuclear disaster can be. The US did it also but kinda on a smaller scale at the 3 mile island. Don't get me started on the Atoll Islands either. Right now there is a nuclear disaster that's going on right now and hardly anyone outside of that country really knows about. The Fukushima Nuclear plant!!! Back in 2011 the Fukushima plant suffered the worse case scenario thay could've happened. Well maybe not, but damn near it. The only thing that could've been worse is if more than 1 reactor had a meltdown. Japan has been running water though the Plant trying to keep it from melting down again and killing more people. Now that Japan has been doing this, they don't have anywhere else to put this radioactive water that they are using. Now I know I am not the smartest guy in the room, but if the water is already radioactive, why can't they just keep on cycling that water? 🤔. I honestly don't know. But I do know that I have heard that since Japan has no where to put this water. They would just release it back into the ocean. I know that the ocean water on the coast of California has a rise in the radioactive tolerance. See there no way to keep radiation out of the water and soil. This is natural from our sun and the elements in the Earth. But these numbers are climbing and climbing. This is only 4 disasters that have happened and 3 of which were on accident. I couldn't imagine what would happen if all of the world's nuclear weapons went off as dirty bombs. I am pretty sure that all life on Earth would be affected. So any animal that breathes in and out will most likely die of radiation sickness or worse live out the remaining years of their lives suffering. The food chain will collapse and this will kill most animals that didn't die at the beginning. The time it will take the Earth to recover will be longer than people and animals will live. So yes I very much do believe that man can ruin this planet and isn't it obvious already that we are still doing it today? Anyway this is only my opinion and that's it. I hope that I am wrong but I kinda don't think so. Please prove me wrong and tell me that all the nukes we have can't kill the world. Thank you for your time and I wish you the very best.

@hubbitut

11 ай бұрын

nah unsub ...

@halweilbrenner9926

11 ай бұрын

Meanwhile it's over 100° on August 29th '23 here in Arizona.

@georgemanno1651

11 ай бұрын

Thanks Exxon!

@timgraham93

11 ай бұрын

It's had nothing to do with so called climate change. The moon controls the weather but as it is moving away from the earth at 3.8 centimeters every year it will have resulting affect on global change

In 1971 while I was a senior at the University of Illinois, I attended a lecture on climatology. The professor started the lecture by saying that the single greatest variable in earth's climate was the amount of radiation that the earth received from the sun. He continued by saying that there were no long- term records of the variability of the sun and that we simply don't know how the sun's radiation varies over time. Now it just seems to me that we can't possibly forecast the earth's future climate when we don't know what the sun is going to do.

@t.c.2776

9 ай бұрын

Your problem is that you went to college in a time of logic, rational thought, reason, and honesty... not political propagandizing... forget everything you learned and act stupid, or they'll come for you... 😉... Enlightenment and Education back "in the day" was different... it was based on actual knowledge, or the lack of, and not biased and flawed computer models based on Political Ideologies.

@patriceferguson7340

9 ай бұрын

Well that mechanism of cause is plausible however one must also consider the shielding of the planet from radiation from the sun. How good has that held up during these events or is it weaker now then in past events and the likelihood that having a weaker magnetic field will have more dramatic effect without a lot of energy being used by the sun to create a breaking event? Since it is now 25% weaker now than 1850 and the magnetic field is clearly and quickly moving away from the poles circle? Say we come to a point where if they keep migrating at the same pace by 2040 we have less then 50% strength and the poles are meeting At where the equator is. So Captain Kirk. We know the power of those photon torpedoes coming from that Romulan ship. But I argue that our shields are down by 25% and worse yet there seems to be an issue with the cores energy output so we are not able to beef up power to the shield. So that torpedo barrage is likely to have unpredictable consequences we are not prepared to guesstimate on long term damages. What say you?

@Ragnovlod

8 ай бұрын

Do we not know more about the sun now, 50 years later? I'm not saying or assuming we do, I'm merely asking.

@EndUser-yu7gg

8 ай бұрын

@@Ragnovlod we have more tools in the modern day to monitor it but that does not magically make the data for the times for which we didn't appear and make a justification ... should we be good stewards to our planet... yes ... should we be careless no ... this climate change stuff sheesh I remember when I was in elementary school and they had us on this big eco thing and that was in the 1980's where cartoons like captain planet and the planeteers still had references to the soviet union vs as we know it today RUSSIA ... and all that time it was all what we hearing now ... Earth is a living system and we are simply a speck of the entire planets history ... we need more data but I'm with most people on the idea we do not have enough of it to draw informed conclusions ... but if you ask the green thumbs they magically do and we MUST listen to them all over again ...

@woodspirit98

8 ай бұрын

Valentina Zharkova

Relatively balanced presentation. Just remember: the earth’s climate is never going to be affected in any way by paying additional taxes. Politicians will, of course, disagree.

@captainmoretokin2172

5 ай бұрын

You can bet your bottom dollar. just pulling out a cliche from the rollo desk in my head.

@ActivateMission2ThisTimeline

4 ай бұрын

KanadastanHas entered your comment.

In 2nd grade they tought us about changing climate. We hit a long period with stable weather enabling us to populate. He went on to say that will change also and if we dont learn to grow food underground or find another planet we will cease to exist. He was the greatest teacher and an intelligent, interesting man. Ran tug and barge to alaska it sank and he lost a leg to frostbite, a commercial pilot flying dc 3s, solved math problems that had never been solved. He warned us of many pending problems that need addressing, mainly the government. Sure wish we had teachers like that today and wish my grandkids could have learned from him.

@maviswilhelm8390

Ай бұрын

This genius was teaching 8 year olds?

IF we all live in pods and eat the bugs, we will make the weather gooder. A guy in a private jet told me so.

Even when the Sun goes supernova and destroys the world i guarantee it'll be raining in the UK.

@randallpainter2691

11 ай бұрын

😂

@kathymc234

11 ай бұрын

But going to destroy the world. A micronova occurs every 12k years. And yes, it's a problem. But obviously humanity has survived before. Checkout Suspicious Observers.

@bernieyorke6356

11 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@isaacperkins5227

11 ай бұрын

For some reason I imagined a British couple having tea with a "keep calm and carry on" framed embroidery and a photo of the queen on the wall while the world is literally ending. 😅

@StanBrohnSBFilmArts

11 ай бұрын

Our sun will not go supernova, doesn't have enough mass

When everything is finally gone, no humans, no earth, no atmosphere. I feel so bad for the Rolling Stones, they will have no one to perform for.

@sourlemon1874

2 ай бұрын

fr

@GeorgeIharosi-jt1yp

13 күн бұрын

@@sourlemon1874 Mick Jagger will be doing his chicken strut on Mars.

Everyone has to remember that the billions that have been sunk into the "research" has one important rule. The research grants can only be used to show harm. They are not allowed to show any benefits to climate change.

@swiftlytiltingplanet8481

7 ай бұрын

So fossil fuel industry propaganda has gotten to you. Did you notice how they got you to flip the narrative, to make the "evil" scientists sound greedy, when in fact oil industry CEOs make 100 times their income per year? The nearly 100 climate-denying front groups, think tanks and websites the industry funds (source: Drexel University) freely promote false information about climate science. For them, there are no repercussions. For scientists to peddle misinformation? A loss of credibility, of funding, and a career. Contrary to the nonsense you've been fed, scientists must PROVE their findings with evidence-based data, and that data must be confirmed and replicated by others. They can't LIE without being caught. So they DON'T. If you think anyone in climate science has lied, name him. Fossil fuel industry marketing has quite literally taught you to think this way. Sad.

@Gladescat

Ай бұрын

Because the so-called benefits are absurd in relation to the damage. The only benefit I see is that monocots and C4 plants (corn) will grow well. Dicots (apples, strawberries) depend more on insect pollinators and insects are particularly sensitive to thermal change.

@braxxian

5 күн бұрын

“If there is a regular pay check I’ll believe anything you say” Ghostbusters summed up so called “climate experts” way back in the 80’s

What many people forget is that the terms "Medieval Warm Period", "Little Ice Age", "Roman Warm Period", etc are not climate terms and were not coined by climatologists. These are historical names given by historians and archaeologists based on the physical evidence.

@RedXlV

6 ай бұрын

And those previous warm periods were *not* in fact warmer than the present day.

@JohnJ469

6 ай бұрын

@@RedXlV Yes, they were. Look at the historical facts, what people ate and grew. People often use the fact that people grew grapes in Britain during Roman times. Greenland had farms on land that is still permafrost today. Recent reduction of the Swiss glaciers has revealed trade roads that were in use 2,000 years ago. In the case of the Greeks, Romans and Egyptians we can read their records and we know what things were like. That's how we can say that the current warming started in the 1600s, because of Japanese records. In a way it comes down to whether you prefer computer models and proxies or the written records of the times.

@RedXlV

6 ай бұрын

@@JohnJ469 People still grow grapes in Britain *today.* Even in northern Scotland.

@JohnJ469

6 ай бұрын

@@RedXlV Very good. Although you do know that the ones in Scotland are usually in greenhouses? (Kinda cheating to leave that part out, don't you think?) Now perhaps I wasn't clear, I didn't say that they didn't grow grapes in the UK today, but without the mod cons they aren't as good. My apologies. The very real difference that you are ignoring is that the roman grapes were grown outside, without and fertiliser or modern technology yet produced a very hearty crop. Understand that these grapes made wine good enough to export to Italy using the sailboats or carts of the time. If you tried Roman methods in the UK today the grapes wouldn't be of the same quality, it's that simple. According to the Royal Horticultural Society (who know a few things about growing plants) outdoor grapes can be grown in Southern Britain south of the line between Pembroke and "The Wash". But I'm sure you know better than they do. Just because you can plant a vineyard doesn't mean you get good grapes. That's why a knowledge of several fields is useful rather than just reading the Greenpeace website for information.

@carltonreese4854

6 ай бұрын

@@JohnJ469 Now that's what I call a serious takedown. The only reply you will get is the sound of crickets.

The Earth will not die, we will.

@billmullins6833

11 ай бұрын

Why do you think that? We homo saps are highly adaptive critters. Somehow the people in Oetzi's time managed to survive the cold snap that preserved him. Catasteophists be damned! My money is on humankind. Oh, for the record, REAL climate scientists like Judith Curry are predicting things to get REALLY cold starting around 2030. I am old and likely won't live to see it. You young folks however . . .

@nigelliam153

11 ай бұрын

Only if the WEF get their way with their sustainable population of 2 billion. I wonder who those will be.

@glenjaques5581

11 ай бұрын

@@Dionysos640 Pratt

@BridgeStamford

11 ай бұрын

@@Dionysos640humans will be gone a long long long long long time before the earth gets swallowed.

@seastnanseastnan7765

11 ай бұрын

By then humanity will have an advanced space program going that will see colony ships moving out into interstellar space. Some will succeed and some will fail but I tend to think that it is fairly certain that humanity WILL survive in the long and distant term. It would help today if the great powers would stop their constant warmongering and one, the USA in particular. Humanity needs visionaries not warmongers and elitist global bullies to lead it.

WHAT WE DO KNOW IS THAT CHANGES HAVE BEEN GOING ON FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS. THOSE SPECIES THAT ADAPT MAKE IT, THOSE THAT CAN'T ADAPT GO EXTINCT!!!!!

The Earth's climate and weather are far more complex than any computer model can reliably analyze or predict. Most, if not all, of the previous computer model based climate predictions have failed.

@rps1689

7 ай бұрын

Some of the things that were predicted by main stream climate science that materialized: Planet greening, global average surface temperature will rise due to added greenhouse gases, nuisance flooding in low lying cities will get more frequent, sea level rise will accelerate due to thermal expansion and land ice melt, CO2 fertilization, agricultural hardiness zones and wild species ranges moving poleward, the Arctic warming faster than the equator, the stratosphere cools while the troposphere warms, marginal farmland going out of production, causing refugee flows and political instability, increased rate of species extinction, tropical pest species invading the subtropics. Subtropical pests invading temperate zones, and permafrost melting. More predictions are still on track. Predictions from mainstream climate science have been accurate for half a century; they mostly use climate models. Not only do climate models form a reliable guide to potential climate change, they have predicted many of the phenomena for which we now have empirical evidence. Also mainstream climate models have accurately projected global surface temperature changes. Climate models have given us a better understanding of the fluid dynamics of the atmosphere plus global patterns in the ocean, atmosphere, and records of the types of weather that occurred under similar patterns in the past, and they have reduced the uncertainty of climate change impacts, which aids in adaptation to name a few. This is the reality when these models use physical laws and mathematical equations that reflect our understanding of atmospheric and oceanic processes. Models are just tools; they don't drive the data: they are attempts to understand the data either in terms of specific reactions or in historical terms.

@Snowdog070

7 ай бұрын

Agreed. The oceans are an incredibly important factor in the earth's climate. Trying to remember a stat I heard recently......something like the oceans possess 100x the energy of the atmosphere. They certainly possess 45x the CO2. They are also a fluid like the atmosphere. Current science can't begin to predict future atmospheric temperature due to the interaction of two fluidic environments as diverse, dynamic and complex as the oceans and the atmosphere. Also, very importantly, the models are based on IPCC worst case scenarios (they run hot) and have incredible difficulty with cloud which is a far greater influence on global warming than silly ole' trace gas CO2. In my book, the alarmists bent on the control of humanity by ushering in their communist utopia should have picked water vapour from industry and Granny Smith drying her clothes on a clothes line rather than CO2 but admittedly they've done a good job of pounding their anthropogenic CO2 silliness into the soft heads of the media and the masses. I also hear that they are now frustrated by the awareness of common folk who just aren't buying the anthropogenic CO2 thing and so they are thinking about their next great source of fear - fresh water availability. Awe, cycles within cycles indeed.

@rps1689

7 ай бұрын

@@Snowdog070 The amount of CO₂ in the air closely matches the known quantity of fossil fuels consumed, minus the quantity that the oceans have absorbed. Oceans absorb 30% to 40% of the added CO₂. They're absorbing CO₂ because the partial pressure is higher in the air than in the water. By huge measure water vapour is the most powerful greenhouse gas of all, causes variations in atmospheric temperature variations, but water vapour is a feedback, not a primary forcing, to a very good first approximation, because it rains out. The arithmetic sign of that feedback is positive, which makes it an amplifier. If only we could demonstrate water vapour feedback (to the forcing by noncondensing GHGs) with a negative sign. We’d be famous and rich. Brings to mind Henry's Law describes equilibrium conditions, but climate “skeptics” love to to bring up Henry’s Law when going on about how CO2 lags temperature when it does, but not when it doesn’t; trying to make an argument that CO2 has no effect on the atmosphere. But any one familiar with basic atmospheric physics knows Henry’s Law doesn’t apply now because there is no equilibrium now because human activity has disrupted the equilibrium, which is why oceans are absorbing too much CO2 now because the partial pressure of CO2 is higher in the air than in the ocean. Henry's Law will not apply again until equilibrium is restored.

When I was at school in the 1960s, we were taught that an ice age was well overdue and the signs were that it could occur any time.

@n.b.p.davenport7066

11 ай бұрын

Absolutely right

@markcarlson1945

11 ай бұрын

We are currently in an ice age of the brain😂

@MisterHowzat

11 ай бұрын

In the '70s scientists were saying we were entering a new ice age. But by the end of that decade, average global temperature started going up and levelled off by the century's end. The earth's climate system is robust and self adjusting. And humans adapt as we always have throughout the millennia. Whether warm or cold, we'll make it through. And fossil fuels help us adjust and adapt better than our ancestors ever did. But trust power grabbing politicians to screw things up to make it harder rather than easier for us to make it through.

@archimedes2261

11 ай бұрын

We have ice ages in Canada all the time 😆

@mr.elastomeric1787

11 ай бұрын

Leonard Nimoy made An in Search of episode think its still on KZread.

Warming period in pre-existing must have been caused by dinosaur farts!

@williamevans6522

11 ай бұрын

They drove really big SUV's , too.

@electrolyticmaster8396

5 ай бұрын

What about COW farts and methane?

YT can’t help itself adding narrative driven context message under the title

@stevewheatley243

6 ай бұрын

I noticed that too. Smfh.

So Ötzi took a walk on the pleasant green mountainside one day 5,300 years ago, was shot in the back, just to be covered by a glacier the next day, without a trace of decomposition.

@jamiestoehr7331

7 ай бұрын

Lol exactly. I’m all for objecting on the status quo for climate change, but the argument he gave for an example of short term warming is so incredibly weak.

@robertsattler8201

6 ай бұрын

Living in Munich the Ötzi-Museum ((Bozen/ Bolzano) is just 280 km - so I saw it and learnt that cool info was found out by investigating his food of the last 24 hours where he was walking down and up in the mountain! As this could be tracked by the different herbs and seeds he was continuously eating by grasping stuff from the environment. By these plants also the climate should be clarified as well - knowing the altitude of the valley and where he was shot!

@alals6794

5 ай бұрын

Just as I thought....this video is BS. Thanks, you saved me 16 minutes of watching it.....

@mandoralen43

4 ай бұрын

Quote « Ötzi died in a snow-free gully near the pass. Exposed on the surface, he freeze-dried, which led to the exceptional preservation of his body. Then snow fell and buried the body and the artefacts. A short time later, a glacier covered the area, and buried the body and the artefacts for more than five millennia, like in a time capsule »

@ospyearn

4 ай бұрын

@@mandoralen43 My comment was an ironic take on the unlikely assumption that Ötzi's walk occured in a bronze age climate that immediately gave way to an ice age when Ötzie was shot. I have no argument with your account :-)

You’re absolutely right to question how a guy died on naked ground in an area that was covered with ice since then. They never want to explain how it was warmer then than now without Diesel pickups.

@brenda6162

5 ай бұрын

And here, in Brazil, many leftists believe that the kettles emanate CO2 and metane into the atmosphere. I would think that the bituminous coal mining causes more.....

@rogerdavies8586

5 ай бұрын

Milankoic cycle warming then

One derivative factor solar variation was not mentioned: increased solar wind which wards off interstellar cosmic rays, and decreased solar wind allows cosmic rays to create more clouds in the Earth's atmosphere. So when clouds are more numerous at solar minima, less sunlight is absorbed by the atmosphere, allowing a cooling effect. When the sun is more active fewer clouds hinder absorbtion of solar heat, thus heating the atmosphere. The Maunder Minimun is about the solar minimun at that period. We are seeing another very low solar minimun at nowadays, which would likely lower Earth's temperature, thus possibly created a new ice age. The sun's cycle is around 11 years, with greater or lesser variation in intensity being generated in a much longer cycle. This is sufficient to completely explain "global warming" with no human SUVs required. Climatism is a political hoax.

@nigelliam153

11 ай бұрын

Now that is what I was expecting this video to say.😀 Great summary. Do you recall the names of the Russians who wrote the paper?

@markdalton3834

11 ай бұрын

@nigelliam153 no Russians were involved in this paper as were no Russians involved in any interference.

@plzsavethebeez743

11 ай бұрын

Yes it is! Google or KZread Valentina Zarchova for her theories with added variables other climate scientists have not considered!

@SeeTheWholeTruth

11 ай бұрын

Clouds are derivative penetration products, due to solar penetration.. of which you completely are leaving out of the equation.. because you are not informed or aware of what the cause is, especially considering you are only looking at 11 year cycles... You need to include full details if you ARE aware, because what you put here is easily refutable. 6k and 12k cycles as in the past show the effect with the geomagnetic pole slips, which is ongoing and speeding up as our atmospheric shell contracts further and further, and allows in the greater penetration of solar pressure. This "cooling" effect is no different than the super heated effect, for they will both occur, and YES THEN with the shift and dust accumulation as effecting the sun AND IT AFFECTS all of the planets as it is.. there will be indeed a glaciation age again. The problem is.. you leave out so many factors.. I dont think you are clear AT ALL of all this can entail or will cause in problems for the world. You need to look into SuspiciousObservers for the full playlists and details.. there if FAR more than this brevity pinpoint you are looking at.

@edwardmoore-kd5uq

11 ай бұрын

Forget about climate change. I just want unpolluted air and water.

The hole in the argument about Oetzi the ice man is that he would have rotted if he didn't get killed in an icy environment. To say there was no snow on the Alps and then, suddenly, a permanent change took place during the time it would have taken him to decompose (climatically speaking, from one nanosecond to another) is a risible notion.

@michelleshirek9253

10 ай бұрын

There were no huge Galciers in the Alps during the ROMAN period Oetzi? Lived far far far before then Several thousand years His little patch of glacier survived all that time

@RedXlV

7 ай бұрын

That's a perfect example of how global warming deniers have to just make shit up, because facts don't support their positions at all.

@tracys3096

5 ай бұрын

If he was being chased to death, he may well have tried to escape by getting to a higher altitude where there is ice. There are a million scenarios. Both could be correct.

@warrenpuckett4203

5 ай бұрын

I don't know but there may be evidence that mountain glaciers have been expanding and contracting more than a few millennia. The question not mentioned. How much?

@Daniel-vw7mw

4 ай бұрын

@@michelleshirek9253 how did the Roman emperors get to eat icecream and cold drinks if there were no glaciers?

There is a theory out there that the planet goes through an apocalyptic cycle about every 12,000 years. Can anyone guess how long it's been since our last apocalyptic event? Yep, we're just shy of 12,000 years right now.

@Imhimdogg

10 ай бұрын

So if they say we’re moving through the cosmos how could there be apocalyptic cycles,wouldn’t apocalyptic events be unpredictable since our galaxies moving through the cosmos would have different effects on us from solar winds and cosmic radiation’s changing constantly?

@NoOriginalContentOfficial

8 ай бұрын

We are moving through space but it doesn’t negate the cycles? If that’s what you’re asking

@davidharper4570

7 ай бұрын

The sun is the principle driver of earth’s climate.

I never believed in global warming. I have always believed that the earth fluctuates.

@braxxian

5 күн бұрын

We live in a world of cycles. Some are short like day and night or the 4 seasons. Some take tens of thousands of years to run their course.

The final ice core from Greenland 🇬🇱 where they drilled to the very bottom of the ice 🧊 the analysis 🧐 showed that we are currently in a rapid cooling period and the scientist that did the analysis said that this is a very risky time to be experimenting with cooling the planet 🌎 even more! 🥶

@junicohen7918

8 ай бұрын

Pffft.if we lower co2 enough food won't grow and the billionaire class can get rid of the poors.

@sloboda222

7 ай бұрын

I wouldn't worry about us (humans) cooling the planet, because we don't have that much influence as well as making it hotter. All those "human induced" climate change narrative is used for other purposes (financial, power grab, etc.)

@robertlanham4306

6 ай бұрын

So this is why the big rush is on to cover the earth with reflective and extreme cold metals. To bring on the ice age

@TyeJak588

6 ай бұрын

@@robertlanham4306 Wa- huh Solar Panels aren't reflective. If they were reflective, their entire idea wouldn't work.

@RedXlV

5 ай бұрын

Really. "We are currently in a rapid cooling period" even though Earth continues to rapidly warm?

I’m beginning to see patterns on a global scale and it boils down to good and evil. A simple litmus test to determine which is in play, just ask, “what is the intention” - IF this is a land grab then the intent is not at all honorable and has to be nefarious. Truth doesn’t hide in the shadows.

It's time for humankind to be humble and accept that despite the great advancements we've made there are still a lot of thing that we don't know and maybe will never know.

@Eric_Tennant

11 ай бұрын

Indeed

@oscarfernald9402

10 ай бұрын

@cesararias7023 And who exactly were responsible for those great advancements we’ve made? That’s right, the people who refused to just accept the things we don’t know.

@cesararias7023

10 ай бұрын

@@oscarfernald9402 The things that we don't know can't be accepted or refused. We can only seek for answers and hope to find one. What we cannot/should not do is to make bold statements on matters we don't have a definite answer about.

@oscarfernald9402

10 ай бұрын

@@cesararias7023 Of course I meant to say ‘accept the fact that we don’t know things’, I should have phrased it better. Regarding climate change, we will know soon enough…

@cesararias7023

10 ай бұрын

@@oscarfernald9402 I wish we could get some real unbiaded info real soon but I will not set my expectations any high.

It was warmer during the Bronze Age - we are heading into another ice age

@rps1689

6 ай бұрын

Nope. It wasn't a global phenomenon. Our planet is still in an ice age called the Quaternary Period because there is pack ice in both polar regions year round. We're in an interglacial period called the Holocene Epoch, but it's still an ice age. There is no reason to expect the weak forcings from orbital eccentricity can overcome anthropogenic greenhouse gases. The last glaciation of the Pleistocene will be the last until CO2 goes back down, if ever.

@GordoGambler

6 ай бұрын

@@rps1689 😄😄😆😆😅😅🤣🤣😂😂

Great video, I totally agree with almost everything you say, ACCEPT 😢! Check the history of Holocene periods in the last 4 Holocene’s of THIS ice age were very short periods and much much shorter than the glaciation periods in between, they lasted only a few thousand years and the longest was 11,000 years right where we are now or already a little shorter than this Holocene. The consequences of glaciation is immensely worse than anything attributed to global warming, the current policy is a parade of EXTREME IGNORANCE!

@andydouglas2108

6 ай бұрын

Well stated.

@pigdroppings

6 ай бұрын

During the Little Ice Age...25% of the people in Denmark starved to death. In a big Ice Age, billions of people would probably starve to death. In Global Warming, large amounts of land in Canada and Siberia would become farmland.

@Nostrudoomus

6 ай бұрын

@@pigdroppings Funny, that nutritional science has recently discovered that supplementing magnesium reduces cancers overall 40 to 50%! Where would humans get lots of magnesium, glacier water 💧 passing through glacier rock 🪨 rubble piles. And it appears that after the Mad Cow 🐮 prion disaster in Europe Scandinavian countries went back to eating more wild game, fatty fish, and that has made them 2 inches taller, like American 🇺🇸 cow 🐮 boys until a few years ago our average hight lost two inches and that average hight of 5’ 9” is only seen in humans in the past with Hunter Gatherers! The cowboy diet, meat (meat ALWAYS out under the sun so it has tons of vitamin D when butchered) and potatoes 🥔, with mountain waters loaded with minerals to drink is the HEALTHIEST DIET, mean while science tells us we are a tropical species but out diet genetics says we are Scandinavians!

@Nostrudoomus

6 ай бұрын

@@pigdroppings It is scientific fact that has never been denied that the Icelandic diet is the healthiest diet, that is with 50% of fats omega 3!

So gluing yourself to the street is not going to change the weather? It’s just so scientific, it must work……

@troythomason8032

11 ай бұрын

No, but it might get you the attention you crave...and maybe a sore hand for a while.

@markdalton3834

11 ай бұрын

Speed bump! Terrorists gluing themselves down to the street.

@brianlawrenson2815

11 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@krisiluttinen

11 ай бұрын

No but it sure will expell more emissions from idling vehicles.

@mr.elastomeric1787

11 ай бұрын

Theres a video on Fox news. Looks like New Mexico; they chained themselves to a trailer. Best part was the cops weren't having it. Believe protesting on A Federal Road carries up to ten years in prison. Didn't apply in Minnesota.

Absolutely on the sun being responsible and on the cycles of everything. While only recently confirmed in the mainstream, stars absolutely do have micro nova events on various cycles and it does occur cyclically on our sun. We are currently approaching grand max around 2025 in the 11 year cycle. Sun has been super active lately as it approaches the max. Not to mention the ever increasing rate that the magnetosphere weakens (also cyclical in its occurrence) as the poles ever increase in their rate of movement…which allows all solar radiation easier penetration. We are on the brink of several cycles that are lining up to, unfortunately, occur together. Lucky us.

@1lightheaded

11 ай бұрын

Citation please

@bite-sizedshorts9635

11 ай бұрын

@@1lightheaded Google.

@oldfart9443

11 ай бұрын

Definitely another 0bserver 👍

@UnknownMoses

11 ай бұрын

The sun is irresponsible

@brianfitch5469

11 ай бұрын

Thats true and doesnt even take into account all the geoengineering spraying the skies and using atmospheric heaters.

One thing they did not mention was the weakening of the VanAllen belts or magnetasphere and the allowance of more direct radiation from the sun. The pole reversal or excursion is in full swing as we speak. Should this not be taken into account?

@maryt8377

8 ай бұрын

👍It must definitely be taken into account , although many don't.

@antimatter4444

7 ай бұрын

Totally agree. I have watched (talks) and read (papers) "thousands of hours" of climate related material, and found this video a really well put together presentation, more in layman terms, that more people can readily absorb without endless graphs etc. And for sure, I think the one point they did not address was the current variability in the Earth's magnetic field (poles rapidly migrating). Good point @onesciencedad, high five. HNY.

@axeman2638

4 ай бұрын

Yes, but modelling that stuff on a global scale would require more computing power than chatgpt

@axeman2638

4 ай бұрын

About the only thing that can be said with much certainty about the climate is that it's very complex, we don't even understand all the factors at work, and even if we did we couldn't measure enough of it accurately enough or have enough computing power to model it for anything but very short term predictions.

I think we’re exiting the ice age that we’re currently in and have been in for the last 2 million years. What we’ve been experiencing since 1996 is an ice age termination event.

I live next to the sea; And although according to the news I should have drowned 22, 19, 18, 15, 12, 8 and 3 years ago, I'm still here and sea level has been the same for the last 40 years, so...

@lucycarin

11 ай бұрын

The cycles of the sun are 11 yrs, our planet has 12,000, 6000, 1500 years apart events, you can check for yourself the weakened magnetic shield our okles have moved dramatically volcanoes under the waters will cause a mini ice age…it is real and politics aside✌🏼

@93pants93

11 ай бұрын

That’s false, sea leaves have risen roughly 1/8 of an inch per year

@mischavanasperen3063

11 ай бұрын

@@93pants93 No, it hasn't. Not here at least.

@jacekdutkiewicz2334

11 ай бұрын

@@93pants93 Some places it raised, some places it has fallen. Nothing to do with climate.

@michael1345

11 ай бұрын

It wasn't FOX they are deniers, still are. What news, they sound entertaining.

The best thing for this planet would be to turn back into an ice ball for a million years or so

@elizabethwinsor-strumpetqueen

4 ай бұрын

correct , which is why I have bought 400 hot water bottles !

Very interesting. I've said all along that regardless of the cause of current rising temperatures, it can't hurt us to clean up our air and water, and use cleaner and more sustainable sources of energy.

@bennieknape4857

10 ай бұрын

NO

@dondavi5798

10 ай бұрын

Not disagreeing however there needs to be clear understanding of what "sustainable" actually is. The minerals for electric, solar and wind are being mined and processed in an unsustainable manner and not replaceable once altered. Not to mention are toxic in their natural and altered forms. Also create more of the "evil" CO2 to be processed from discovery to usage. How much plant life "that helps absorb CO2" is sacrificed for the fields of solar panels, either by clear cutting or dead for loss of available light? How much wind is redirected via the resistance induced by wind farms? Changing the natural path of temperature variance and direction? How big is the crater being created to mine the minerals needed to create the "sustainable" thus changing not only wind patterns, but also rise and fall of moisture to the atmosphere that could create rain producing clouds? Or the overall mass of the land the hole now is in creating a potential difference is "above sea level" measurements? If the green religion were honest they would be able to admit that not only emissions but sun, clear cutting, water diversion, artificial fertilization and multitudes of other factors come into play. However those are not profitable for politicians and zealots. It's easier to finance the extreme to sit in traffic causing vehicles to idle for hours - causing more emissions to enter the atmosphere- than it is to risk honesty and loss of funding of political pet projects that turn into financial profit, or for the "scientists" to make money via government funding to keep studying things relevant and non relevant.

@jonb5493

10 ай бұрын

@@dondavi5798 What a load of tosh.

@stevenhull5025

10 ай бұрын

Sustainable sources of energy?? I always wonder how much energy is used to manufacture the millions of solar panels, wind turbines and now lithium batteries for electric vehicles. Sooner or later they will need to be recycled = more energy.

@davidkennedy4845

10 ай бұрын

Yes by all means, live cleanly, conservatively, use less, and be mindful of what we leave behind, and be kind to each other. "Leave the campsite cleaner than when you arrived".

If the ice man was frozen, then there must have been ice to freeze him or he would have rotted away within a few months.

I’m pleasantly shocked that the mega corp that owns this platform is not canceling this thoughtful analysis of so called climate change.

@randoir1863

11 ай бұрын

my thoughts exactly . IF this video was pro climate change it'd easily have 1million views .

@nativespiritindian8278

11 ай бұрын

your telling the truth thats all that matters WE ALL WARNED THEM NOW THEY WILL SEE blessings to you@@randoir1863

@Mrbfgray

11 ай бұрын

Competition is or will keep them in check to a degree, Twitter(X) and other platforms allow free speech.

@jerzbouy1

11 ай бұрын

"Everything! changes." Better save than sorry. At first I did think this was anti-climate change propaganda, but then I watched the entire video...and again "better save than sorry."

@jerzbouy1

11 ай бұрын

@@Dionysos640 Thanks for pointing out my need to "read" what I wrote.

I've been saying for a long time is that everybody has forgotten about the sun's output and how it affects our weather

@BridgeStamford

11 ай бұрын

Everybody?

@chrispritchard4676

11 ай бұрын

You are so right. The Solar Flux has been decreasing since the 1970s.

@cubsfanbigmike31

11 ай бұрын

Wow you should work for NASA or NOAA, I'm sure they haven't considered the sun's output or earth's fluctuations before.

@DemonsCrest1

11 ай бұрын

​@@cubsfanbigmike31 i'm sure they have. but climate change is an industry. people are paid to complain about it, find "solutions", etc. so they gonna keep doing it. feminism does a similar thing, its not going to go away because so much people depend on the problems persisting, so they never going to solve the problems it is tasked to solve. its also one of those "when you have a hammer, then every problem looks like a nail" situations. if you are tasked with "solving" climate change, then you have already asserted that it is a problem you need to solve, so you are going to apply your hammer to any problem you see, even if the problem is not a nail. if its too hot, the problem is climate change and you need to have more activism to solve it. and if it is too cold, then the problem is climate change and you need more activism to solve that as well. i can see in the the future, and when the temperature starts dropping they gonna be saying "its because of this thing humans did that the temperature is now dropping. we need more control over people and to take more of their money to solve the problem".

@cubsfanbigmike31

11 ай бұрын

@@DemonsCrest1 you dropped your tinfoil hat King 🧎‍♂️ 👑

"One of the most important findings that climate scientists have come up with in the last several decades is that Earth's climate changes in cycles and these cycles are driven by changes in Earth's orbit around the Sun not in changes in the strength of the Sun but changes in the orbit." ~Dr. Ruddiman, University of Virginia.

@rps1689

2 ай бұрын

You left out that no mechanism has been discovered for variations in the solar wind or magnetic field to affect Earth's climate significantly. It is a red herring when folk claim these forcings do; popular on "climate skeptic" pseudoscience blogs, but we know once a talking point gains inertia in the "skeptic" echo chamber, it never dies. The steady decline in energy output, the 11 year cycle in sunspots, and the variations in the solar wind shows no correlation with climate on annual, decadal, nor century scales. On time scales relevant to human history solar irradiance is practically constant. Even near solar minimum, when galactic comic rays have easier access to Earth, and during the solar maximum, their spectrum remains relatively constant in energy and composition, varying only slowly with time. Just as the solar cycle follows a roughly elven year cycle, so does galactic cosmic rays with its maximum.

Great mini doco here. It is obvious that the climate is changing, however, the climate Dick weeds are putting all their eggs into man made change. As you have described there are many natural variations that have far more impact on climate than our miniscule disruptions. For example many volcanologists scoff at the idea that man's activities can do more damage than a full blown volcanic eruption, especially a super volcano. like you said the major driver to our climate is the SUN, and any slight variation in the planets revolution can have catastrophic outcomes. Cheers !

Although you touched on it in a general sense, you missed a significant currently occurring factor: the erupting underwater volcano in Tonga is pumping huge amounts of water vapor into the atmosphere.

@t-technews

11 ай бұрын

That and the other volcano eruption that send particles into the atmosphere causing harsher and longer winters. 20 eruptions of a larger scale this year alone could make this winter pretty wild.

@NeverSuspects

11 ай бұрын

@@t-technews Water vapor is a greenhouse gas.. kinda. Well its effect is like that of a greenhouse gas and it is in far larger quantity then the trace gasses such as co2 and water vapor interact with a broader range of IR including the part of the spectrum that co2 interacts with. I'm skeptical of the whole green house effect having any role in long term climate as it seems the 30 degree day night swings in temperatures show that absorbed ir is less absorb and more diffused through the gas atmosphere giving ambient temperatures rather then just radiant heat from solid object emitting heat.

@MrGarymola

11 ай бұрын

@@NeverSuspects....there are credible sources that say Co2 is not a greenhouse gas because it collects to close to the ground.

@TheHoveHeretic

11 ай бұрын

@@t-technews "other volcano"? Cut and paste not working? 🤔

@manoo422

11 ай бұрын

@@TheHoveHeretic You think there is only one volcano in the world...?!

Doug Vogt and Ben Davidson have been talking about this. Great video. The sun is the key.

@ellendolbin3707

11 ай бұрын

Yes, tune into Suspicious Observers.

@jwilliams3269

11 ай бұрын

Ben Davison lol…….

@Juanalbertocruz1

11 ай бұрын

Ben is a genius. Been following him for years now.

@nobodyimportant7567

11 ай бұрын

Don't leave out Adapt2030 along with Suspicious0bservers and Diehold foundation. They are all talking about the coming ice age, solar killshot, etc.

@robertstewart7228

11 ай бұрын

Most channels that covers this topic are shadow banned .. Adapt 2030 and magnetic reversal news is some more

Nicely done! So refreshing to hear people talking about this.

Very interesting video. I've been watching a documentary on 536 A.D., when volcano activity caused very rapid cooling. The documentary indicates that over the past century or so, the Earth is experiencing very low volcano activity, with regard to its past. A super volcano or two erupting over a short period of time (not that I'm for that) could change the whole global climate discussion.

@futureme8719

11 ай бұрын

Now follow your thoughts down the road and try to connect the available data. What else happened around that time? When did the "little ice age" start? Of course we dont have any real data for the suns activity for that time, but we can try to calculate what was going on. ;-) BTW: How is the sun behaving today? How many volcanoes started to errupt in the past couple years?

@harrywalker968

11 ай бұрын

maybe tell gretta bloombum,, that 1 decent volcano spews out more sht than we do in a thousand yrs,, & ask if she will stop them, ......

@oleyullah

11 ай бұрын

Hasn't the Justinian Plague happened around that time? Probably directly caused by the malnourishment caused by volcanic wi ter induced crop failures etc

@Lifecomesfromwithin

11 ай бұрын

Volcanic activity and magnetic pole movement have both increased since the 1880s and especially increased in the last 15 years

@EM-ig7ib

11 ай бұрын

Actually, the event occurred in 535 AD and we know this due to the evidence found in the fossil record, the ash layer it put down, historical writings that survive to this day, and tree rings from trees that lived during that time. It was the same volcano we know as Krakatoa today. It caused the deaths of millions of people and animals. Caused Global winter lasting almost 2 years. It exploded again during the 19th century And it will explode again on some level in the not distant future.

The earth is going to do what the earth is going to do All we know is we have to get ready for it It’s a cycle you can’t change

@jjrickards

11 ай бұрын

True, but our contribution towards the current observed changes are undeniably supported by hard evidence such as the direct correlation of atmospheric carbon and less energy leaving our planet than arrives from the sun than without that blanket.

@kathymc234

11 ай бұрын

But the government can keep taking your money so you can't afford to prepare.

@kathymc234

11 ай бұрын

@@jjrickards do you actually believe that cow farts are melting glaciers?

@beez1598

11 ай бұрын

@@kathymc234that person didn’t mention cow farts anywhere. Get a grip. Read into the physics of how carbon dioxide warms. And since you may be confused, methane is the greenhouse gas you’re thinking of.

@alanfroegel

11 ай бұрын

climate models have overestimated c02's affect on temps. from 2015 until recently co2 went up while temps stayed flat. now with this sun cycle temps seem to be going up. It's the sun. Also, past climate disasters show us things could be more worser. Perhaps the real deniers are those who claim that if we stop making c02 then the climate won't change -- for a chaotic system is ever changing; we are just limited in predicting just how it will change, but change it will.

"Semantic Scholar Glacier and lake-level variations in west-central Europe over the last 3500 years". During the Roman period, glaciers in the Alps were virtually non-existent, while in 1859/60 they reached their maximum extension of the last 3500 years, thanks to the Little Ice Age.

@etienne8110

10 ай бұрын

Yeah sure... read about Hannibal s crossing of the alps...

@rogerphelps9939

10 ай бұрын

You do not need to travel on glaciers to cross the Alps.@@etienne8110

@snowcrash.snowcrash

7 ай бұрын

@@etienne8110 Regarding "crossing the Alps": No Carthaginian sources of any kind have survived, and the accounts by the Greek historian Polybius (written about 70 years after the march) and his Roman counterpart Livy (120 years after that) are maddeningly vague. Reconstruction of both imaginary descriptions of the crossing, points out on just one posible mountain pass, and that's Col du Montgenèvre which is on 1,860 m. There are no glaciers in Alps on such altitudes today, and there hasn't been glaciers 2200 years ago.

@etienne8110

7 ай бұрын

@@snowcrash.snowcrash there is only one paper from 2013 claiming the alps were "ice free" 2000 years ago. The paper is written by a well know climate negationist financed by thz fossil fuel industry. Many scientists critized the paper, so much that it was invalidated. But lying is a second nature amongst your kind. Read the science. There were glaciers back then.

Dionsaurs were wiped out due to a combination of 3 major events, not one. The infamous strike to the Yukatan did not kill all dinosaurs. Many species survived and partly recovered. A second strike finished them off but neither was big enough to wipe out all dinosaurs way over in the larger area of the Indo-China region. This area was (to put mildly) insanely volcanically actice at the time. Actually, for a very long time, the entire region was completley unlivable. The combination of all three events ended the dinosaurs.

@edwinhurwitz6792

7 ай бұрын

And that was volcanic activity over a very long period of time that makes a couple of eruptions cited in the video entirely inconsequential.

Our science, our technologies, our combined human knowledge should not be used to limit or control us. This is the very same mentality of a past era when earth was mandated as the center of the universe and others were exiled/put to death as heretics! YES, let us discuss this!

I've heard a theory that states an ice age is preceded by a warm period such as we are having now. Anyone else heard this?

@ellendolbin3707

11 ай бұрын

Tune into Suspicious Observers. Ben discusses the ocean currents that change. He also posits that as the glaciers melt, all that frigid water currents into the oceans, cooling them again..

@markmccullough5873

11 ай бұрын

@@ellendolbin3707 thanks

@markhedger6378

10 ай бұрын

Yes and that increases snow fall which starts the cooling process

@rogerphelps9939

10 ай бұрын

Ocean cooling would be a local effect. Collapse of the Atlantic circulation could plunge Europe into another little ice age but global mean temperatures would still be increasing.@@ellendolbin3707

@richtensail

10 ай бұрын

yes, is happend b4 n will again, wel burn n ven freeze, if were stil alive?

Thank you for this no nonsense look at our planet. The question now is who gains what by taking basic freedoms away from the ignorant masses? Enjoy.

@jlrutube1312

11 ай бұрын

@@Dionysos640 If we took "you" out of the sentence it will help even more.

One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.

The problem is the change in where they monitor the temperature from the country to city centers (inside a heat island). Manufacturing and manipulation of data.

@rps1689

8 ай бұрын

Time to take off the tin foil hat. The thousands of stations south of the Arctic circle and north of the Antarctic circle is more than sufficient to get a picture of the current rate of global warming not to mention most of the surface of the world is covered in seas and ocean, which there are 3800 argo floats all over the world in every one of them including above the Arctic Circle and Antarctic Circle. An educated person up to speed knows that when NASA, GISS and the Hadley Center characterize a source of bias and correct the raw data for it, the "conservative news" and "climate skeptic" bloggers hoot and jeer. They call it "fudging" and “manipulation." All gathered data from the environment and that the surrounding conditions need to be quantified objectively through a rigorous open process that is very reliable. This process is never explained by crack pot outfits for a reason; they are all about misinforming and never explain how raw data used in climate science can never made up “made up numbers” in order to “prove” a predetermined end result. Instead they call those adjustments “falsifying”, ”fudging”, and “manipulation”, which is mendacious. Nor do they explain if there are any errors and bias that make it into peer reviews, most scientists plus leading working scientists will pounce on the culprits be it an honest error or not; competition is way too fierce in this field. The great thing about peer review, is it exposes bought scientists being called out by honest competitors, which there is no lack of.

@GordoGambler

7 ай бұрын

Yup. 90% are on parking lots at airports. The Dust Bowl was FAR warmer.

@rps1689

7 ай бұрын

@@GordoGambler Wrong. The thousands of stations south of the Arctic circle and north of the Antarctic circle is more than sufficient to get a picture of the current rate of global warming not to mention most of the surface of the world is covered in seas and ocean, which there are 3800 argo floats all over the world in every one of them including above the Arctic Circle and Antarctic Circle. And bringing up the Dust Bowl is irrelevant. Listening to Tony Heller lately? The 1930s was warmer then today is a lie, as we know Tony Heller fooled many by swapping in a chart of temperatures over less than 2% of Earth's surface and told us it was the whole globe; such stuff comes from professional liars.

But the ice man's body was well preserved , so the snow most of being there in alps at that attitude and time .

@terri348

11 ай бұрын

The drop in temperature? Or maybe the season that Utzi died compounded by his lethal wounds.?

I am really surprised that the powers that be allowed this to be seen.

Recently, two British Universities revealed humanly worked wood. Each time these pieces were dated, the ages came out to 479,000 years. Almost a half a million years! So, the entire narrative is obsolete.

I can remember in the early mid 1970s the media scaring the crap out of us (almost weekly) with "the next ice-age is just around the corner". Hollywood jumped on that band wagon. If I remember correctly, TIME magazines "man of the year" one year during that time was dressed as an arctic explorer as to say, "welcome to our near future"! Thank you for publishing this video!

@rps1689

2 ай бұрын

Well tere never was a scientific consensus about an imminent ice age in the 70s. There were two papers, by Schneider, Kukla, and Rasool, that made headlines when the reporters misread them. They predicted the slow cooling of 1940-1980, which was caused by global dimming might continue. Their papers said that If that trend had continued, the ice sheets would be back, in 20 to 40 thousand years. But the reporters missed that part. The tabloids ran an imminent ice age scare and the newspapers picked it up from them. Then it went to The Late Show and there were references in sitcoms, and that silly show with Leonard Nimoy.

The weather was so different when I was a kid. We used to have a lot of snow every winter, and that you still rain all the time. It's not like that anymore, it's just weird, east coast.

@timjeffries7061

11 ай бұрын

But this kind of change was definitely NOT anthropogenic.

@Kededian

10 ай бұрын

Climate is not a constant. Its dynamic. Dont believe the fearmongering on mainstream media.

@emitissimo7618

9 ай бұрын

And when I was kid, the Sun was yellow and you could look at it for second or 2? Now it seems white? Hotter? Hotter sun, warmer planet?

@AtHomeTacticalDefense

5 ай бұрын

Pacific Northwest: Growing up In the 1970’s and 80’s there were many high wind and lightning events; Much more so than today. It all changed around 1992. 1992-1996 the weather was phenomenal.

What about the earth's magnetic field ? It is after all one of the mechanisms that protects the earth against both the sun and cosmic radiation, and field-strength has been steadily decreasing in recent history because of both the earth's magnetic poles increased magnetic excursion, and has up until now, decreased in field strength by as much as 20 percent. Which basically means, that as the earth's electromagnetic field grows weaker, the more solar and cosmic radiation should (and would) enter the overall system (through both the polar regions), adding more energy into the earth's atmosphere.

@thinuspieters3144

11 ай бұрын

Men made MMR is a danger 🛑towards Earth Magnetic field...

@reddune6185

11 ай бұрын

Absolutely, I also watch Suspicious Observers, Ben keeps us updated on the earth’s failing magnetic field.

@LivingNow678

11 ай бұрын

@@reddune6185 Suspicious Observers 👍

@stever8776

11 ай бұрын

The Earth's magnetic field has changed multiple times throughout geological time. These changes detect while mapping the sea floor after WWII and comparing it to changes in magnetic orientation in volcanic rocks and layers of organic sediments are the basis for the Continental Drift Hypothesis being seen as idiotic to the beginning of the Plate Tectonic theory. Amazing what a little time can do in theory!! The magnetic pole actually switched over and over again. Recently the declination of True North have changed at a more rapid pace! So maps that have declination listed are no longer accurate. You need to look up your declination for your latitude to adjust your magnetic compase! Cheers

@rogerphelps9939

10 ай бұрын

Wrong. It has not a lot to do with climate.

Wonderful to see emerging science out in the open instead of hiding from the cancel culture. I subscribed. Now if I can get some of my teacher friends a to bring actual science to young people. Oh what a wonderful world we live on. Lets enjoy it and learn as much as possible without any political or religious Narrative blocking human's march forward.

I'm kind of bummed that Earth's weakening magnetic field was not mentioned. Otherwise a great video. I'd love to see some papers quoted in the notes.

@rogerphelps9939

10 ай бұрын

Magnetic field has very little to do with it.

@BringDHouseDown

10 ай бұрын

@@rogerphelps9939 with the weakening of the magnetic field more radiation seeps in and thus temperatures rise, and the weakening happens every time there is a magnetic shift or magnetic pole shift(more severe) and we're in one of those 2 right now, in fact have been for the past 170 years, right after the industrial revolution by pure coincidence, which is why CO2 from industry gets the blame despite the lack of science to back that up and not the magnetic shift that barely gets any attention since THAT one "is out of our hands" and people in power would rather not think about what they can't control

@NoOriginalContentOfficial

8 ай бұрын

Maybe the weakening magnetic field is warming the planet and then when the pole shifts the magnetic field goes back to full power blocking rays making the planet cooler?

@stevea3514

8 ай бұрын

our magnetic field stops dangerous levels of radiation from entering our atmosphere, it has plenty to do with it, increased sun activity as it cycles up to a max in 2025 and a slightly weaker magnetic field means more radiation is getting into our upper atmosphere, thusly creating warming.....@@rogerphelps9939

@fannyalbi9040

8 ай бұрын

@@rogerphelps9939 magnetic strength is vital. water and air will gone, and face sun’s damaging radiation. it is a slow process but until u notice it, u r doomed

I am sure grateful that there are still people, scientists, that believe the true facts! Because I am soooo tired of hearing others scream and cry and groan,”Global Warming, Global Warming!”

Never in the history of the Earth has so many people decided to destroy humans will such vigor. Those lost minds will never survive the other people that think every thing changes over time and has nothing to do with humans; the lost ones will die off pretty quickly due to lack of offsprings.

Politicians: We cant tax the sun, but we can tax Co2 output...therefore climate change is man made. Case settled.

The Tonga eruption January 2021, blew water to 35000 miles, and the crystals reflected light. La Nina extended a further year and a half.

What if there were civilizations that had better technology than we do today that got wiped out?

I just want people to stop treating the earth like a dumpster. 😂

Computer models:- GIGO! Very common computer acronym from the past that many people forget or have never heard of... Garbage In , Garbage Out!

The effects of the weaking magnetic field on the climate was not mentioned. As it weakens, with a possible pole shift in the near future, more solar radiation gets in and heats things up until the field is once again strong.

Sure, there's natural variability, and then there's the clathrate gun pointed at your face. Problem is, the clathrate gun fired over 10 years ago. The methane release is now unstoppable and we will face something worse than the Permian in the coming centuries. The half life of methane is increasing too, thanks to the hydroxl molecules being used up on stuff released from forest fires instead of methane. A renewed ice age is not possible under current conditions.

I wrote a blog about this in 2010 and it got my popular blog demonitized by google.

I've known an ice age was coming since the 70s because of my dad. He had me watch a documentary with Leonard Nimoy as the narrator. We listened to a few times. And I've been listening to David Dubyne for 10 years.

Told daily by the media here the world is boiling. It just never stops

@EmeraldView

11 ай бұрын

That's because it is.

@DnBclassictunes

11 ай бұрын

@@EmeraldView Prove it

@EmeraldView

11 ай бұрын

@@DnBclassictunes Yeah everyone is lying to you. It's a grand global conspiracy. 🙄 You'll understand soon enough.

@marcushoward6560

11 ай бұрын

@@DnBclassictunes It's easy when you just remove all the data that proves you wrong, er, I mean, "normalize the data".

I dont think i heard you mention the beaufort gyre release that can happen when too much cold fresh water melts from the polar ice.

Very interesting video. Thank you!❤

I hope the earth and sun check with kerry to make sure if its ok..lol

Since mid August, I have been using a blanket to keep warm as I sleep. Global warming is climate changing to global cooling.

Of course an Ice Age is coming. In fact we are in the middle of an Ice age which started some 2.75m years ago. Within this ice age there have been between 30 and 50 cycles of alternating glacial periods and interglacial periods, depending on how you define them. We are at present in the Holocene interglacial and the previous one, some 125k years ago is often referred to as Eemian interglacial. Our slid into the next glacial period was delayed by mans activity of plowing, destroying forests, growing rice in swamps and burning carboniferous fuels. Delayed but not stopped. The ice started to accumulate on the high lands of Baffin island, resulting in the demise of lichens which were covered for multiple years. This was triggered by the black death and the demise of the people of the Americas which allowed a great surge in forest growth. Then the industrial revolution hotted up, spewing more green house gases into the atmosphere and the nascent continental glacier retreated, leaving a halo of dead lichens around the high lands of Baffin Island. When green house gasses decline again we will likely slide into the next glacial. Lovelock predicted that by the end (actually he said by the middle) of this century the population of the earth will have fallen to 1b. If that was to happen, we would likely have a repeat of the forest growth-spurt, sucking down green house gasses and leading to the next glacial.

@theodorefreeman

11 ай бұрын

"In fact we are in the middle of an Ice age which started some 2.75m years ago. Within this ice age there have been between 30 and 50 cycles of alternating glacial periods and interglacial periods, depending on how you define them." Contradictions. Check out Suspicious Observers. We have detected and expect the galactic current sheet to hit within the next 30 years. We are living through the change to the next Ice Age.

@Odo-el2mh

11 ай бұрын

It's true. An Ice Age is defined as a period when at least some parts of the land are permanenty covered with ice, which is exactly what is going on right now in this planet.

@Runinfox

11 ай бұрын

Thanks for info --sounds solid--Just a couple of years. a Couple of Volcanoes with enough Ash could flip things sooner than later---As a MONK I say OUCH--massive and shocking

@glenndavis4452

11 ай бұрын

For greenhouse gases to be a climate driver, the earth in your backyard has to be radiating a thermal energy gain enough to heat up the ten miles of air above it. While not affecting 95% of those atmospheric molecules. I have a totally unscientific, undereducated opinion that my back yard is not radiating the energy equivalent to the BTUs REQUIRED to heat that much air. But the factual, basic real life science means it unquestionably has to work like that in order to perform as advertised.

@clivehorridge

11 ай бұрын

How will the earth’s population be 1BN by the end of the century? 🤔

This is one of the best videos I have watched in a while. Thank you.

The sun plays a major role in the weather cycles here on earth. Another factor which is largely ignored by most of the climate models would be volcanos. The amount of CO2 produced by a single major eruption, is on average greater the ALL of the CO2, produced by every human, and animals to ever be on this planet combined.

How dare you, I should be in school, bla bla bla. Awesome clip

I am sure some people won't be happy to hear that it's not unusual to have changes to the weather on earth.

@THE-X-Force

11 ай бұрын

Weather and Climate are not the same thing.

@kathymc234

11 ай бұрын

I'm surprised John Kerry hasn't had this removed.

@kathymc234

11 ай бұрын

@@THE-X-Force Try tell John Kerry that...

@stevenstart8728

8 ай бұрын

I think most people that live in Melbourne already know that the weather changes a lot in one day.

Ice core samples have shown an imminent change into our next ice age for decades. It's literally why we have evidence for previous ice ages.

Awesome video, talk of ice age back in the seventies in the great time line of things is only like yesterday.

Bring it on, the skiing and snowboarding will be epic😊😊😊

Wish CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS had Kids watch this👨‍🎓

We're still technically in an ice age.

FACTS. Thank you for posting.

There is a channel called suspiciousobservers and the global papers about space weather and our changing planet can point you to a mini ice age like it or not politics aside too✌🏼

What do you mean, "an Ice Age is coming." We are currently in an Ice Age. We have been in a warm spike for ten, twenty thousand years. We are in an Ice Age all the same. An Ice Age can last a million years easily.

@paulinetill1043

7 ай бұрын

we're headed to an Ice age termination event thats why the earths warming up, the ice caps are retracting releasing CO2 and Methane which has been locked in the ice for thousands of years. The IPPC 6TH ASSESSMENT REPORT estimates that the Co2 and Methane released from the permafrost could amount to 14-175 billion tonnes and would raise earths temperature by up to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. So the Ice age could be coming to an end

The Dam is going to break the crack is 40 ft long and 6 inches wide in places. Yeah it's been that way for 25 years now, and it's holding just fine even after our last Earth Quake. But they found it sits on a major fault line. Yeah but that was 5 years ago and it is still ok. Oh! i have to go and replace those bald tires on my car i don't want to get a flat because i don't have a spare or a jack.

Yes, cycles - everything is cycles within cycles, just as geometrically, the universe is hierarchies of scale. But there is also a hyper-dimensional aspect to it, which we cannot perceive with the sense built into this rather lower level body form. All our sciences suffer from this lack of dimensional perspective, which limits both our understanding of observed phenomena, but also severely limits the nature of hypotheses imagined and then tested. The 12,800 year cycle is due and the earth is evolving constantly. Great video - subbed.

Your last sentence said it all.

Thank you, I’m glad I was patient after I heard the words climate change. I usually instantly shut it off. Great video and thanks for the common sense.

@jdwyer4851

11 ай бұрын

Common sense is racism...or something. Whatever it is, it's bad. Good think we have the United Nations quote just under the video to keep us from wrong think.

@PeterReefman

10 ай бұрын

Why would you accept this self-proclaimed scientific article unquestionably, while you'd be ready to "instantly shut off" other science reports?...

@ramonvaluezuela1869

10 ай бұрын

“Climate change” is associated with government extortion here in America. The climate is always changing regardless of how much we allow our governments to rob us. Once they use that term they are obviously pushing for extortion and control. Bye bye.

@lynnsbomb

10 ай бұрын

That term makes me realize that it’s someone who sides with the occupying regime in control of our republic in the USA. It’s to push extorting from the citizens, which they claim somehow that it makes the weather perfect for humans. Giving or allowing your money to be stolen by the government does nothing at ALL for our environment. The planet is a living, evolving thing and nothing will stop evolution even if we make government gang members rich.

@lynnsbomb

10 ай бұрын

That term makes me realize that it’s someone who sides with the occupying regime in control of our republic in the USA. It’s to push extorting from the citizens, which they claim somehow that it makes the weather perfect for humans. Giving or allowing your money to be stolen by the government does nothing at ALL for our environment. The planet is a living, evolving thing and nothing will stop evolution even if we make government gang members rich.

"Never let a good crisis go to waste." Winston Churchill "Always question the official line." Me

At one time, the Sahara was lush green plain with many lakes and rivers. Thousands of years ago, the Great Plains of the US were a sea of sand dunes before becoming prairie.

Best visual explanations with facts .

It feels so much hotter now because most people work, live and play in the comfort of air-conditioning. Therefore when they are out and about in the natural spaces it feels a lot hotter than it actually is. Same goes for winter cold. Occupying heated buildings then outside seems bitter cold. But to those of us who work outside its just another day.

@johncunningham4046

11 ай бұрын

I have worked outdoors for the past 25 yrs. I, along with others that have been doing the same, would strongly disagree with you. It’s not the temperature being so much more, it’s the suns rays finding it easier to penetrate our atmosphere. Like literally being cooked.

@masterpoe4942

11 ай бұрын

Worked outside for 40 years building houses and I've been saying the same thing. Most people are just spoiled by AC & soft..lol

@mikelarocque8013

10 ай бұрын

Read a thermometer. It is hotter. It's not cause of AC . Lol

@mooonlight778

9 ай бұрын

because that’s what is happening! we are being cooked due to the holes in the atmosphere, and i’d honestly argue that it also has to do with how many lights we have on, constantly heating us as well. (i know less about the heat from light pollution, than the light itself)

@Pete87O

8 ай бұрын

@@mikelarocque8013 i do read the thermometer, every day. im in construction and i start my morning either wishing it was warmer or cooler. 25 years have gone by doing that, around here the summers have stayed the same if anything LESS extreme, for the last few years november has been warmer an we have had less snow through the winter...but im not ready to sound red alert. the other odd thing, i live on a tidal river next to the house i grew up in. when i was a kid (abt 45 years ago) there was a rock that was always almost submerged at high tide, and today the water level at high tide is the same. i guess i should be happy that the 'rising sea levels' have decided to somehow bypass were i live.

There is only one constant with climate - it’s constantly changing.

What goes up must come down, this is the warming period right before a mega Ice Age that happened 120,220,320 and 420K years ago.

YES! THIS! I teach high school Environmental Science and we discuss how the sun is what drives the biogeochemical cycles and provides the energy that powers activities on Earth and throughout the solar system. I have been trying to comprehend why the alarmists seem to not understand the sun is forcing these changes, along with all the other factors at play in, on, and outside our planet. That's how we end up with computer programmers telling us to cut down a forest and bury it to fight warming or put beach umbrellas in space to block the sun.

@DalaiDrama-hp6oj

11 ай бұрын

You should NOT be a teacher with that resistance to science, research and education

@wwiiinplastic4712

11 ай бұрын

@@DalaiDrama-hp6oj I have no resistance to such; it is the ability to do research rather than swallow what I am told without question that has allowed myself as well as over 1600 scientists worldwide who are fighting this hysterical nonsense understand what is actually happening. Study the geologic record and then compare it to what the 'experts' are telling us. Not that you will, as bots can't do research.

@joeld8825

10 ай бұрын

​@@DalaiDrama-hp6ojyes. How dare an educator who's job it is to learn and to teach, doesn't blindly follow the latest line of indoctrination. Science is to be QUESTIONED, meaning it is objective and can be WRONG. If you believe it blindly then what you have is faith of a pseudo-religion, which isn't scientific at all.

@matthewnirenberg

9 ай бұрын

Its simple - money! There is no money to be made without a crisis, there are no laws to be brought in to centralise power and to dictate how everyone live, without a crisis. They literally quit studying the Vostok Ice Cores because it disproved the official narrative of "CO2 bad, humans causing problem". The Vostok Ice Cores showed the earth was coolest with high levels of CO2 and low levels of methane, and that when methane levels were high and CO2 levels were low, the earth was at its warmest. Currently, the elimination of CO2 globally is likely to kill all plant life on the planet. There are currently plans to build and run global CO2 scrubbers to remove all CO2 from the air in either Iceland or Greenland. In the last 20yrs, plants have gone from being green and growing well to being yellow and very slow growing - this is due to CO2 levels being too low. Without plants, we all die as there won't be any breathable air. We need plants. You want happy healthy plants, look at what experts do in greenhouses - they use CO2 generators to get 4-5x the plant biomass that they'd otherwise get. The climatards are currently preparing to cut down entire forests and bury them to "eliminate CO2". They've ended all natural and renewable timber industries in Australia and New Zealand, all in the name of saving the planet from CO2. Wood in Australia and New Zealand is now imported from Indonesia and South America for use in construction. Even if one believes the official narrative - everything that's being done is only worsening the problem. The follow things are doing so: * More construction than ever before * Everyone having to throw out everything that isn't "green" and replace it with "green" products that either don't work as well or don't work at all (greenwashing) * Mining is being done at ever increasing rates to produce integrated circuits, computers, batteries and EV's. These all have limited lives and to recycle require extremely energy intense processes (i.e. huge CO2 footprints) * Landfill is being left to rot because the climatards say gas is bad so the methane from landfill can't be used * Landfill is literally creating new mountains because according to the climatards you can't incinerate it with filters to generate power and prevent landfill because that only works in the Nordic countries and Japan but absolutely nowhere else * New laws forcing huge very expensive renovations to be done to houses to make them "green" - if you don't you lose your house or the govt "upgrade" it and give you the bill which if you can't pay, the govt will seize your house * 15 minute cities are being slowly forced on us all - travel is being restricted, cycling and walking are the only options if you want to go where public transport doesn't go. Air travel is being slowly banned, EV's are deemed only for the very rich - the average person will have to "go without". Options of things to buy and reducing greatly. CBDC's will limit where you can spend and what you can buy * CBDC's - to geofence where your money works, what you can spend it on, how much you can save, etc. * Outdoor activities such as camping, fishing and hunting are being slowly banned by locking up all the public land to "save the climate" - they don't want anyone self sufficient * Farmers are being paid to quit farming and their properties are being "re-wilded" for the "climate". No farmers = food shortages = you'll be forced to eat bugs All these points have two things in common - money and power. A handful of very rich and powerful people are making literally hundreds of billions, if not, trillions from all of this. All whilst concentrating power into their hands or the hands of their puppets. All whilst we lose everything and suffer. Take the money and power (new laws for "climate" and "safety / health") away and the crisis will magically disappear because the money and power will be non-existent. Many people have come up with actual solutions to the claimed crisis, only to be silenced, to have their funding cut and to be forced out of their professions. Why? Because there's no money in a solution, but there's endless money in an endless crisis. A perfect example of this is: Q. Why is there no cure to cancer? A. Because there's no money in a cure as even it it cost $1 billion per dose, that would be nothing compared to the money made from needing to "research cancer and develop a cure". Remember a customer for life (i.e. needing regular medication) is more profitable than a one-off customer. As such there is zero incentive to actually find a cure, there is however an incentive to be always "looking for a cure". Everyone is already being conditioned for this be a customer for life thing - everything is a subscription. Things that used to be bought as a one-off fee each version/model are now only available as subscriptions. Entertainment is mostly streaming subscriptions - very little comes out on DVD or Blu-Ray anymore $25-$65 per month per service/subscription. It all adds up rapidly and you spend more with a subscription than you would if you were able to buy outright. Remember how everyone mocked people for quoting the WEF saying "you'll own nothing and be happy" - those same people are blindly becoming what they mocked. As Jesse Ventura said - "when you want to know the truth, follow the money!" The only people who are resistant to science, research and education are people like DalaiDrama-hp6oj who lap up the official BS and can't for even a moment have a thought of their own. Simply put - the govt have "yes men", they never have experts. This is because the govt have the people who'll say what they pay them to say whilst anyone who follows actual science gets silenced, defunded and forced out of work. Real science is actively questioned and debated, "the science" is whatever the govt wants it to be. Anyone dumb enough to believe the govt needs to look into how the Australian BOM are "cooling the past to warm the present" by ignoring any readings that show high temperatures in the past with excuses such as "reading was taken on a Sunday - shouldn't have been working", "weather station operator had dog with him", etc. Sky News Australia did a good video on this: kzread.info/dash/bejne/qaeam6yPeNCvg7w.html

Of course, another way to get an Ice Age is a truly large volcanic eruption. Look at how the eruption of Mount Tambora (in what is now Indonesia) caused the famous "Year Without Summer" in 1816, and affected the weather for nearly a decade afterwards. Unfortunately for us, there are several volcanoes in the _Ring of Fire_ that could erupt with even more force than the Tambora eruption, particularly the Lake Toba caldera (not considered an extinct volcano!) and Mount Taupo in New Zealand. These volcanoes could generate an eruption that could severely dim sunlight for up to a year, and that could literally trigger off an Ice Age.

@DalaiDrama-hp6oj

11 ай бұрын

Could! We never know... But there could also be underwater volcanos bringing so much water vapor into the stratosphere that it warms even more...

@shauntempley9757

10 ай бұрын

There is no Mount Taupo. It is a massive lake today. It blew itself up 26,000 years ago, in an eruption that is the biggest in the geological record.

@richtensail

10 ай бұрын

solar diming is being done by v wests industrial revolution which afects climate, its well known. reall cc is being masked by solar diming probably, it wil get hotr is, we hvnt seen v worse yet

@robertlanham4306

6 ай бұрын

So this is why they were nuking volcanoes last year

As a climatology major, I don't even know where to begin. Anthropogenic global warming has vastly different symptoms from a warming caused by solar output, orbital variations, etc. and there is no doubt about which is happening in this case. The former is an insulating effect that is most pronounced at higher latitudes. The latter would cause maximum warming to occur where the most sun comes down, which would be in the tropics. But it is the arctic and antarctic that have seen the most warming by far. Greenhouse gases also redistribute the heat between layers of the atmosphere. We are seeing a dramatic drop in stratospheric temperatures even as they rise down where we live in the troposphere. This is an expected effect of insulative warming. To put it in simple terms, when you put on a blanket, the temperature below the blanket gets warmer while the temperature above gets colder. You are actually depriving the room of your body heat. With more sun, you would expect all of the layers of the atmosphere to heat up, similar to how stoking the furnace would raise the room temperature as a whole.