I understand all of the words individually, but not together.. still can't stop watching

@Khimbdrgrg1

2 жыл бұрын

Same here

@ronawhatever

2 жыл бұрын

U can Wikipedia Civ pro personal jurisdiction and tort vicarious liability and corporate law agency theory. These keywords would probably help u understand it better!

@Feliole

2 жыл бұрын

Jargons are often used in law and court decisions (judgment). They are sort of titles for some rule or court decision which apply to a set of situations. Decisions/Judgements of courts apply the same rules to the same situations. For example: “This rule applies in Case X which has these circumstances. Therefore the same judgment and the same rules should apply to Case Y which has similar circumstances.” Context is key that’s why law students/lawyers study massive amounts of text so that they can apply those rules to a similar situation. Hope this explanation helps as to why law jargon sounds so alien. - From a J.D. Studying for the Bar

@kennethcarvalho3684

2 жыл бұрын

Hahaha true

@isaiahbaggett5014

2 жыл бұрын

Every time I watch these, I think of this comment :P

The stress I would have standing before a court like that.

I just mooted this past semester, and this is absolutely impressive. To be able to delve into caselaw so effortlessly in answering minute and specific questions from judges is unbelievable. These law students could give most practicing lawyers a run for their money. Insane. That’s the level of Harvard.

@onebuffalo5402

2 жыл бұрын

no they couldnt give practicing lawyers a run for their money. They'll be good in time but they also mock trail this about 200x before the competition. something real lawyers dont do (at best a real lawyer might run 1 mock trial if its a massive case)

@dragonflarefrog1424

2 жыл бұрын

@@onebuffalo5402 Ahhh I didn’t know that. Repeated study of one case would make anyone good.

@tylko_do_pracy1083

2 жыл бұрын

@@onebuffalo5402 You're right that they practiced way more than a normal attorney would, you're also confusing mock trial and moot court. Two completely different kinds of audiences and argumentation styles. If you don't practice, you're going to have a bad time. Oyez has a huge cache of SCOTUS oral arguments, you can really distinguish between someone who practiced and someone who didn't.

@esol927

2 жыл бұрын

@@onebuffalo5402 To be fair, if you're a real attorney arguing before the Supreme Court you're probably going to practice more than once, lol.

@liezltatoy2887

Жыл бұрын

8

Love the fact that Justice Kagan never forgets to mention and honor her former law students, and one of them, Elizabeth Prelogar, is now the Solicitor General of the United States (mentioned at the last part). 💯

I thought I knew English till I started watching moot courts in english

Fantastic to see that Ames is back! I don’t understand some of the technical legal arguments but the quality of the oralists is very impressive.

@mohansurya7518

2 жыл бұрын

9

Babe wake up new Ames Moot Competition just dropped

Finally...it's here. I've been waiting for so long....sitting in a corner...pondering "what is life without Ames".

@curiousgeorgia11.11

2 жыл бұрын

lol are we going to be seeing ur face at one of these in the future 😏

Couldn't wait to see it been uploaded. Great insight from all candidates. Great stuff

Brilliant students. Must be very intimidating arguing about /applying Ford considering Kagan wrote the opinion.

I’ve been waiting for this!

Woww. I am speechless. This big annual event is coming again... Hope i'll be there soon.

My favorite time of year. When the next generation of lawyers argue in court. (I’m also glad to see one of my heroes, Justice Elena Kagan, back at the Ames Court)

I’d simply faint.The sheer amount of pressure is suffocating.

Finally... Winter is here... Waited for this for a year

I've watched multiple of these and continue not to know anything they're saying. 💀

@drippysonic9060

2 жыл бұрын

Read the captions. It’ll all make sense better lol

@the_tax_consultant

Жыл бұрын

Technical language can be a bit difficult to grasp at first, but it gets better with practice!

Oh my goodness this was so much fun to watch! Bravo to everyone's hard work!

I'm an LLB student watching all the way from South Africa, I love this.

31:47 to 33:15 This young man is great at going back and forth with Judges.

So excited to watch! I’ve been waiting for this all year!

@alillachmojahid3498

2 жыл бұрын

Your dream is to become a lawyer ?

@elliewise4704

2 жыл бұрын

@@alillachmojahid3498 As a step to becoming a judge, yes!

@alillachmojahid3498

2 жыл бұрын

@@elliewise4704 ohh good way to your nice goal , you have a Instagram ? I want to ask you about this work ( judge) 🙂🙂

@godwinmsekwa9073

2 жыл бұрын

I am so much excited also, I like to be a part of the upcoming moot Court, when it will be held

@godwinmsekwa9073

2 жыл бұрын

@@elliewise4704 congratulations 👏👏

Been waiting for this! 😱

I've been waiting for this

The danger is found in the different side effects that are being felt by the petitioners who have brought the suit😢

The party must be wild upstairs. Kagan knows how to let loose.

21:39 that hair slick was so confident omg LOL

Thank you Harvard Law School for posting this video.

Some impressive performances including that from a fellow Brit. I wouldn’t like to stand before those judges. I’d crumble.

1:06:21 Excellent response to the question on precedents and stare decises (i may have spelt that incorrectly)

@DB-gl3jx

Жыл бұрын

stare decisis

I feel like they can never get the audio right until 30-45 minutes in the competition but it does get better. Also, deciding on who the best oralist was must've been tough but Morgan Sandhu was the right choice!

That speaker “stacy” at the beginning doesn’t seem to be too confident she nervous

@curiousgeorgia11.11

2 жыл бұрын

She’s British amongst native Americans

just checking in to see if anyone fainted this year

@hazel5447

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣 same

thank you

Español cuando van a subtitular eso

I was finnaly able to sit down and give this a listen... The third speaker was incredible...I can't say I heard a single "um" really in her entire argument. I think, if i remember right, i can say the same thing about the 4th speaker as well tbh. Moreover, the way she articulated her thoughts+ her tone was something to behold.

I want to become a lawyer but man i cant imagine myself standing there and not shaking

@BlueSupermoon20

Жыл бұрын

Don’t worry, this is not the day to day for most attorneys. And presenting a case in front of these judges is not what most lawyers will ever face in their careers! Law is dynamic. And you will learn oral argument skills to equip you to deal with situations like this.

Very professional

Although I am not a law student but I like this videos. I started to watch the video but I didn’t understood what they are talking about.After you read the paper that they attached it, you can enjoy the whole video until the end.

it will be good if yall lawyers get together with other lawyers who does the same thing that you do.

no one fainted..

This was very spirited. Mr. Artabet was well prepared.

Brilliant!..

Nice to see a justice from my state supreme court.

who won!? Both right?

Finally, an oralist with a RP accent! Thanks Fenella

One state claims they have jurisdiction, then another state claims they have jurisdiction is this possible if so why??

@memyself4431

2 жыл бұрын

Hi living that scenario for 3 years no answers

@drippysonic9060

2 жыл бұрын

Well I do recall, from my attention payed in class, that there is a concept called “State’s Rights”; whereas, a state government could have jurisdiction to enforce constitutional laws unto their citizens rather than having permission from the federal government.

i been want to know what its like to be on cnn or cspan.

Can someone explain what they r fighting about, r they fighting about drugs or Ford?

@esol927

2 жыл бұрын

It sounds like the basic facts of the case are that the Plaintiff took the generic version of a drug and was injured in a way that the warning label didn't cover. So they are suing the manufacturer of the *brand name* drug, who wrote the label that appears on the generic version. The question is whether the manufacturer of the brand name drug is sufficiently connected to the state, and to the harm that occurred, to allow the court to exercise jurisdiction over them. The first speaker relies very heavily on Ford, a case involving a similar, but not identical, set of circumstances, to argue that because the Supreme Court allowed jurisdiction to be exercised in Ford, the court should also allow jurisdiction to be exercised here. So they wind up arguing a lot about Ford, because the Judges are trying to poke holes in the argument that Ford is *actually* applicable to the facts of this case.

Easy to tell when these took place

What's do the winner get

@moscowirl7253

2 жыл бұрын

respect.

The gaining of profit is absolutely important to the Pharmaceutical Company😮.

Ames Moot Court! Medicine is completely a different world! other than law ; because it needs empathy! One cannot become a good physician without empathy! Pharmaceutical companies need to be more informative before using a particular drug! I am a native English speaker who can speak French, German , Spanish, Mandarin, Swahili (Africa); Tamil, Telugu, Malyalam(Indian Subcontinent),Arabic( United Arab Emirates), Punjabi or Urdu ( Northern Indian States)! Basically I have a very deep root of British Ancestry ! My paternal family was involved in Bureaucracy and Judiciary ; and my maternal family was involved Science and Technology which also includes Agriculture (Small and Large Scale farming);

stupid question....they referenced "the state of Ames" multiple times...does the Ames competition take place in a fictional state?

@SoLyrical2

2 жыл бұрын

yes. Ames is a fictional jurisdiction.

@johnbowden4761

9 ай бұрын

appreciate the clarification@@SoLyrical2

I disagree with the judges - the gentlemen was by far the best oralist.

Nice

Aaaand that's why I didn't get into Harvard!

Why wouldn't they just sue who manufactured the drug?

The second guy.. am I looking at Mike Ross in real world...?

Well say and done some how there get time how they kill on get a way tell them God don't sleep

wow

💯

LLB

why did they literally hammer Ms. Amanze

I love MIT.

👍

la mujer y el de lentes mi gustan.

0:41 isn't she the one who fainted years ago?

@DB-gl3jx

2 жыл бұрын

No she isn’t.

@samararoberts7596

2 жыл бұрын

Lol, no 🤣

she does not emphasis important key pieces

Tôi cho rằng không thể thuyết phục được Tòa nếu bạn lụm thứ bạn đã từng vứt vào sọt rác.

the young lady introducing the case needs to find something else to do. litigation is not going to go well.

When will you bring conservative justices?

@trangvophuong6919

2 жыл бұрын

They... are conservative justices? On this moot court, Justice Kagan is the only judge that was appointed by a Democratic President. Judge Kimberly Sudd was appointed by a Republican governor, and Judge Consuelo Callahan was appointed by a Republican President. This panel has a 2-1 Conservative supermajority.

@jennifera3074

2 жыл бұрын

Oh aria

@rpdbu8250

Жыл бұрын

7th Circuit Judge Easterbrook was there previously.

I’d just bring up my Fortnite wins and earnings and it would be an auto dub. I’d box these judges like fish, absolutely cranking 90’s. Case closed.

@moscowirl7253

2 жыл бұрын

lel you go man

First

Smart 🐑

That young man is too bright for these women even judges cannot defeat him.

@birdieblair5817

2 жыл бұрын

That’s such a dumb correlation

@curiousgeorgia11.11

2 жыл бұрын

@@birdieblair5817 the dumbest

@drippysonic9060

2 жыл бұрын

@@birdieblair5817 Do you know the definition of correlation? That word doesn’t belong in this sentence.

hard to take anyone that wears a face diaper seriously.

boo 🍅

Do they really all have to be wearing masks?

@9290SC

2 жыл бұрын

No lol. Virus goes straight through masks!!! With the exception of N95

why is everyone wearing masks? its very weird

@jennifera3074

2 жыл бұрын

Are you new here

@cleo.butterflysflyinthesky1637

Жыл бұрын

You live under a rock?

these people must be high on something to speak like this...just string together a bunch of big words into sentences which make 0 sense. talk about blowing hot air out of one's mouth.

@anthonymoran1121

10 ай бұрын

Just say you don’t understand

shes very monotone and unenthused

That young man is great and understand law unlike these his colleagues women who are too mounthy and no substance .

@pheeuh

2 жыл бұрын

Did you visit this video to be misogynistic?

@cassiachung4805

2 жыл бұрын

The blatant misogyny in your comment

@HA-ug4qu

Жыл бұрын

@@pheeuh wtf 🤣 what misogyny ? Just criticizing women is misogyny? Maybe he's not a very good judge hence he's not in the video but how tf is that misogyny 🤣🤣🤣

@pheeuh

Жыл бұрын

@@HA-ug4qu you know that wasn't constructive criticism.. there's a complete difference from criticizing and insulting someone