I think everyone agrees that Pakistan snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

@krishnavamsicherukuri4247

16 күн бұрын

Like they always do, it's annoying for at least someone 😅

@Dark_Infinite_Space

16 күн бұрын

No it’s really hard pitch to bat on

@krishnavamsicherukuri4247

16 күн бұрын

@@Dark_Infinite_Space not for the second innings lol

@denyoellamcy8251

16 күн бұрын

​@@krishnavamsicherukuri4247What are you talking about?? The pitch is the same throughout the innings lol

@MihiraUrs

16 күн бұрын

They are the specialists when it comes to that.

even Americans can't comprehend how Pakistan lost that 😂 Pakistan what have you done!

@Ashutosh-lw3cn

16 күн бұрын

Ever heard about "International Beizzati" 😂😂😂

@souvikpal7309

16 күн бұрын

​@@Ashutosh-lw3cnisn't that the nickname of Pakistan 😂

@Ashutosh-lw3cn

16 күн бұрын

@@souvikpal7309 you hit the nail into correct coffin my friend. 😉🙏🏻

@MohsinKhan-un6zs

15 күн бұрын

man putting salt on wounds

@amirhamza7610

14 күн бұрын

Why not say Bumrah what have you done? Never ever appreciate and hype your players

An American, who is learning cricket, says that how could Pakistan lose this match. It shows how Pakistan really choked at the end. Where India couldn't even play full 20 overs got all out at the acore of 119 runs, Pakistan get to play 20 overs still lost by 6 runs. How shameful is that.

@zebesiv

15 күн бұрын

It's kind of a trend on this pitch though. Imagine a ball hurtling at you at 85mph, it hits the turf, but you don't know how it's gonna come off. It could be knee high, it could rear up and hit you on the head, even if you manage to keep the ball on the ground it plugs in the ground immediately because the grass is so tall, if you try to hit it in the air you might spoon it right up bc you don't know how much it will bounce. SA took the conservative approach yesterday and still only scored 113 and still won so...

@smoothshutter

15 күн бұрын

@@zebesivthis pitch did not have uneven bounce. It was tough to play on but uneven bounce was not a concern like earlier matches. Also Pakistan had better conditions when they came to bat. They did not manage their innings well.

@notnice5100

15 күн бұрын

@@smoothshutterthe pitch seems to be made to mimic the subcontinents. But these bats men that’s not used too it are playing it like it’s a West Indian(Caribbean)wicket. The pitch is dead. The batters are playing it too aggressive.

@zebesiv

15 күн бұрын

@@smoothshutter It was better but not by much. All they did was remove the grass covering, which didn't change much at all. Just looking at the wickets though from both sides it looks pretty apparent that some balls would stop considerably. Yeah Pakistan did have it better, I don't think India bowled as many bad balls though, and Jasprit Bumrah was probably a huge fear factor for them. That Rizwan wicket seemed like a shot of pure panic..

So one subtlety that you maybe missed about the 11:20 mark. Although 43-1 is a good score, if you check the overs, they had complete 8 overs and 2 balls. Since India were all out for 119, Pakistan needed 120 to win so each ball they wanted to be scoring a run. They are 7 runs behind where they would want to be at this stage which isn't insurmountable, but it's a sign that even though India weren't taking wickets, they were putting a different kind of pressure on the batting team. Think of the overs as like the clock in a two minute drill in American Football. You need to make progress without letting too much of the game go past. EDIT: - Well done, you actually picked up on that after I paused the video to type it! For a sport with a lot of very subtle nuances, you're doing well! If you get the chance I'd recommend doing a live reaction if you can have someone who is an expert in the chat with you to talk you through some of the finer details, Cricket can very easily be overwhelming with all the little details.

*Just to clarify one subtlety you may have missed :* 1. The track between the bowler and batter is called the "pitch" 2. The pitch used for this game is called a "drop-in pitch". Its artificial, it's very grassy and was assembled in Australia and shipped to the US. 3. Before the game started it was raining very badly. When it rains and the pitch is grassy, the ball skids onto the bat and is faster. At the same time the ball becomes soggy and it becomes difficult to hit boundaries. This explains why Indians scored low and were bowled out very fast for a low score. 4. However, as the Indian innings progressed, the sun came out and dried the ground. So it should have been easier for Pakistan. But the Indian bowlers bowled extremely well and miserly...restraining the Pakistan batsmen to a very low score.

@arkajitmondal872

15 күн бұрын

Add one point except WK fielders can't not wear any gloves like Baseball ⚾

@mtk3755

14 күн бұрын

Also our batting was also not really great we should have done better

I love when you said ‘what am I witnessing?’ That, my friend, is known as a collapse. When a batting team loses multiple wickets in quick succession, scoring almost no runs in between, putting their chances of a win in jeopardy. So in this case India went from 89~3 to 96~7 (sorry my normal hyphen isn’t working). Happens in all forms of cricket and it’s really dramatic because multiple new batsmen who come in are mentally overwhelmed and end up doing something stupid and losing their wicket almost as soon as they arrived.

@mtk3755

14 күн бұрын

Yup its basically pressure showing that cricket is ultimately a psychological game

Actually 120 runs in T20 is nothing and practically not really defendable score! 160 or 180 is respectable score to defend! In this match, pitch conditions were really favourable to the bowlers, ( uneven bounce, ball movements ) so 120 runs were difficult to score!

@paramtageja6891

15 күн бұрын

On that New York pitch anything is defendable tbh

@arkajitmondal872

15 күн бұрын

Yes pitch is the one of the main factors in cricket, and reason of Out of Shivam Dubey , jadeja , Hardik and Suriya Kumar is the extra bounce of that pitch, that's why Pitch is the main factor

Chasing 120 runs on this wicket was not as easy as everyone was thinking, if Pakistan had batted first then they would not have been able to score even 100.

It's amazing considering that Pakistan got 159 against USA and lost, that they couldn't beat that score...

@darthvader_donovan

15 күн бұрын

Demerits for India: 1. Lost the toss. 2. Wet outfield during India’s batting. 3. No sun in the first inning, causing the ball to swing. 4. Ball spun better in the first inning. 5. India’s batting order collapsed. 6. Psychological setback: difficult to defend a match, especially a low-scoring one, for bowlers and the captain. Kudrat ka Nizam: 1. Won the toss. 2. Cloudy and rainy weather supported fast bowlers. 3. Pitch favored fast bowlers, aligning with Pakistan’s self-proclaimed status as having the most dangerous bowling lineup in the world. 4. Sun came out in the second inning - no swing. 5. Ball was coming to the bat easily during the second inning. 6. Psychological benefit: Pakistan had the lowest score to chase in an India vs. Pakistan match, thanks to the adverse conditions India faced in the first inning. 7. Easier for Babar to captain in the first inning. Conclusion: Pakistan fans are still consoling themselves on social media, claiming that India didn’t beat Pakistan; Pakistan beat itself. Time and again, no matter what, Pakistan always tries to take all the credit, even when losing. According to them, Pakistan can’t be defeated by anyone unless they make mistakes on purpose or choose to lose. In other words, they consider themselves invincible: “in logo ko koi nahi hara sakta agar yeh khud nahi chahe to…” Summary: According to Pakistan’s die-hard fans, India didn’t win; Pakistan lost. In their eyes, Pakistan is unbeatable unless they intentionally mess up. It’s a delusion of invincibility that refuses to accept defeat, even when it’s staring them in the face. Cricket, where excuses flow like a broken dam and delusion reigns supreme. In this theater of absurdity, winning isn’t earned; it’s a lottery where every little hiccup becomes a monumental catastrophe. And for Pakistan, it’s not about being defeated; it’s about clinging to a fantasy of invincibility, even as they trip over their own egos. So, if you’re not prepared to confront the brutal truth that sometimes you just get outplayed, then cricket might not be the game for you.

@shreygirdhar9923

15 күн бұрын

​@@darthvader_donovanAgreed bro. Pakistan was never much ahead of India. Even when they needed Run a ball, India always stood a chance because the pitch was like that and all of the Pakistan batters except Fakhar Zaman was struggling. And even Fakhar got out. The problem was Pakistan fans celebrated too early when they got a target of 120. They thought it was an easy win. And when they lost, they interpreted as an intentional loss. Indias win started with Fakhar's wicket. Then , Rizwan also got out who was the main stabilizer of the team. After that, the pitch was hard for new batters and India bowlers bowled perfectly. What Pakistani fans are doing is like saying India intentionally lost against New Zealand in 2016 T20 wc group stage match when Nz defended 126 and all out India on 79.

@zebesiv

15 күн бұрын

Two completely different surfaces, the other game was played at Dallas, this one in NY. Different surfaces will behave differently.

@mtk3755

14 күн бұрын

Cricket depends on its conditions very much from pitch to wind etc. This pitch was tough for the batsman so I don't blame them but yes their batting is poor. Also in opposition was one of the best bowling units in the world.

Wickets also matter because there are chances you are going to stay alive in the game but if all 10 wickets are gone, the innings end for that side

A Pace Bowling masterclass from India there, Bouncers and Yorkers completely perplexing Pakistan's Batters.

Demerits for India: 1. Lost the toss. 2. Wet outfield during India’s batting. 3. No sun in the first inning, causing the ball to swing. 4. Ball spun better in the first inning. 5. India’s batting order collapsed. 6. Psychological setback: difficult to defend a match, especially a low-scoring one, for bowlers and the captain. Kudrat ka Nizam: 1. Won the toss. 2. Cloudy and rainy weather supported fast bowlers. 3. Pitch favored fast bowlers, aligning with Pakistan’s self-proclaimed status as having the most dangerous bowling lineup in the world. 4. Sun came out in the second inning - no swing. 5. Ball was coming to the bat easily during the second inning. 6. Psychological benefit: Pakistan had the lowest score to chase in an India vs. Pakistan match, thanks to the adverse conditions India faced in the first inning. 7. Easier for Babar to captain in the first inning. Conclusion: Pakistan fans are still consoling themselves on social media, claiming that India didn’t beat Pakistan; Pakistan beat itself. Time and again, no matter what, Pakistan always tries to take all the credit, even when losing. According to them, Pakistan can’t be defeated by anyone unless they make mistakes on purpose or choose to lose. In other words, they consider themselves invincible: “in logo ko koi nahi hara sakta agar yeh khud nahi chahe to…” Summary: According to Pakistan’s die-hard fans, India didn’t win; Pakistan lost. In their eyes, Pakistan is unbeatable unless they intentionally mess up. It’s a delusion of invincibility that refuses to accept defeat, even when it’s staring them in the face. Cricket, where excuses flow like a broken dam and delusion reigns supreme. In this theater of absurdity, winning isn’t earned; it’s a lottery where every little hiccup becomes a monumental catastrophe. And for Pakistan, it’s not about being defeated; it’s about clinging to a fantasy of invincibility, even as they trip over their own egos. So, if you’re not prepared to confront the brutal truth that sometimes you just get outplayed, then cricket might not be the game for you.

@DeboB375

15 күн бұрын

Kudrat ka nizam 😂😂😂😂😂 Allah bhi inlogoko chor gaye.

@samrat7

14 күн бұрын

Kudart ka nizam😂😂😂

Look cricket is a game of uncertainty 😅 a player make a century today's and got out 0 on the next game that's how it works But pitch also here is a big factor how many runs the team going to score new york pitch wasn't good for batting. It's a complete nightmare for batsmen I would say😅.

@dvo66

16 күн бұрын

it was actual orthodox pitch for test

For a clear understanding - 1. A player who gets out, doesnt get to bat again in that whole match. So once out, u cant swing the bat anymore in that game. 2. Bowling team has to take 10 wickets in order to finish the game. If u get 10 wickets that means no one is left to bat any further. So after losing 10 wickets, that will be counted as your final total of runs (points) and other team has to score more than that. Thats all. (Exactly same if you are chasing a target. If u lose 10 wickets before u could chase down target set by the team who batted first, u lose). 3. Each batsman has his own skillset of hitting the ball so getting initial wickets early usually means - getting the best batters out so the batting team is now in trouble because bowling team is now reaching the bottom line. After 5-6 wickets usually bowlers (pitchers) come to bat. They specialize in pitching not in batting. (Of course there are all rounders who can do both bowl and bat but mostly teams have specialists of batting and bowling. There is no criteria or limit for selection of all rounders it is just that specialists pitchers mostly are better pitchers (bowlers) and same goes for batting. Plus if u r an all rounder you have to have an Amazing stamina of doing both. It is physically draining). 4. Unlike baseball - one team can only play once and the other team chases down the set total of runs (points), with those 10 wickets. (11 players in total, but 2 batters play together as u can see. A single player left out at the end after 10 wickets down, is not allowed to play alone. It ends the innings for any team if they lose 10 wickets despite any number of overs left out)

That new York pitch is extremely difficult to bat

Yes you are right in your statement that "Wickets are rare, while runs are prevalent" in cricket but this statement is limited to T20 Version of cricket only where conditions are made favorable for batters more as people/viewers are more interested in watching a 4 or 6 compared to seeing a wicket falling (unless its that of opposition). However, there are sometimes when players encounter such pitches (surface where batting and bowling happens) and conditions which is more conducive to bowling (variable bounce, overcast conditions which encourages ball to shape vigorously in air, turning pitches where ball spun quite a lot and also larger boundary with sluggish outfield) which prevents batters to score runs at the rate they generally operate on any typical pitch they play T20I. That's one of the reason why cricket is a bit hard to grasp, considering its quite a lot dependent on conditions and hence there isn't a fix template and players has to adopt.

Gonna try and explain why Pakistan lost. Half the game is decided by the playing strip. Different surfaces will behave differently; There are surfaces where the ball zips through and bounces extra, giving the quicker bowlers a slight advantage. There are surfaces where the ball stops a little bit, making it easier for the slower bowlers. Then there's a goldilocks zone where the ball just comes off nicely for the batsmen to hit. Because of this variance anywhere between 140 & 200 can be said as a 'winning total' depending on the surface, provided that the ball behaves consistently off the surface. On this surface, the ball was super inconsistent. Balls that were pitched at the same spot could hit the batsmen in the head or could hit them in the knee, it could also skid through low, stop or zip past at a height. Imagine a ball hurtling towards you at 85mph and you just don't know what the ball will do when it hits the turf. You have like 0.5 seconds to react, even lesser after it hits the turf. So on a playing strip like this even 100 can be defended. Also they tend to roll the surface with a roller before each innings, hence the bounce tends to be more even right at the start. Around the 10th over mark during both the innings the wheels came off and it became impossible to bat. All the bowlers had to do is to pitch it at the same spot and let the surface wreak havoc. The batsmen on the other hand had to be really careful as to what balls to attack and what to play safe to, and just make sure to be there at the end. The Indian bowlers were consistent, the Pakistani batsmen misread the game, they lost..

@mtk3755

14 күн бұрын

I'd also say that indian batters also little bit more careless to hit such shots. And pak batsman a bit more cautious. Difference of approaches gave us an interesting contest

In cricket pitches also matter. The New York pitch is not batter friendly so it is having low scores. The average scores on that ground so far are around 105 runs.

India - Father of Pakistan 🐐💙

Great to see you Luke understanding the concepts of cricket in short time 👏👏🫡

Just if you start to think 120 in T20s is tough to chase, do check out 264 chase by Punjab Kings in IPL 2024

This was Worst performance of India but.... Still pakistan didn't able to Defeat India 😂

@navoneel

15 күн бұрын

It's the opposite, just because they failed at batting, doesn't mean they did their "worst performance". Cricket performance isn't about batting. India had done absolutely amazing during bowling/fielding.

@sayantan033

15 күн бұрын

It was bad from India in the sense they couldn't even manage to be there for full 20 overs. It is great that India was able to defend 119, but it was more of Pakistan's loss than India's win. Yes I do appreciate the efforts of Indian bowlers but not every team is Pakistan 😂

@shivenbhupendra1100

15 күн бұрын

@@sayantan033 Think you need to bat on that pitch against pace bowling and then say again.

the pitch where ind vs pak was held was a bowling pitch, which assists bowlers, there runs are hard to come by and bowlers gets enough swing and bounce and unpredictable variations which help to take wickets. so in this match getting a 130-140 score is really amazing, india got 119 ands still manage a win

When 10 wickets are down then innings is over no matter how many over remains in that innings.

There was a legend in the Indian Cricket Team called Dhoni, He used to come to bat at no.6 after 4 wickets had gone, so even if the match was in a tense situation, people believed Dhoni would pull it off, so It's also about the influence of the player who is batting at a particular situation, Bowlers are not good batsmen, so after 7-8 wickets are gone, people are tense because that's when the bowlers come to bat and you do have some batting hope from the all rounders who come to bat at no.6, no.7 and no.8 but still not as reliable as the top order (top 3 batsmen)

now imagine you are new to cricket and we have been watching since our childhood and we still dont know how could pakistan loose 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Just seen your reaction to the USA v Pakistan upset is on 88k views, good for you mate. Keep going. Cricket could be hitting America and a whole wave people could start playing and watching as a result.

A comment about the batting order: Traditionally, your best batters are number 3 & 4 (ie 1 down and 2 down). Your openers are treated as expendable to some extent because they're supposed to either attack up front and take risks, or negate the new ball which tends to move around more. Batters 5 -7 are crisis management/finishing specialists. If a number 5 batter comes in at 20-3 they should be able to get their team to a safer position, whereas if they come in at 150-3 towards the end, they should be able to get quick runs. Number 3 & 4 though should ideally be protected from the new ball so that they can work their magic with a good platform laid out, and they should take up the middle portion of the innings, keep things going, take calculated risks etc. It isn't necessary that they're the best batters either, just that batters at different positions play different roles and they're all important. The 'best batters starts first' trend is hopefully a short lived one because it's not a good strategy..

India vs Pakistan is the most high pressure sports match on this planet ,players know this and whichever team handles the pressure well will win the game.

Love your efforts ! Also check out what Power Play (PP) is and why it matters to get good batsman out early. Notice that during the PP only 2 or 3 fielders are allowed after the 30 yd line and so this part of the innings allows the striking team to rake up a high score.

Dude those are highlights so they don't show dot bowls in between..they didn't gave those Wickets consecutively as shown in highlights.

T20 unlike longer formats is a bit different in how teams employ their strategies and resources. They may not care much about wickets lost since there are 20 overs only and 10 wickets in hand! This was a bit of a sticky wicket - the pitch was two paced and had uneven bounce. Otherwise, a run a ball chasing in the last 60 balls is not too much when you have 5 or more wickets in hand. Usually good teams chase about 80 to 90 off the last 60 balls if they had 5-6 wickets in hand. Hence the sub par score and loss of more wickets than usual. You can see that some of the batsmen were through with the shot before the ball arrived and ended up popping the ball up for easy catches because the ball got stuck in the pitch and came slower than it was traveling in the air before it bounced. But, this is what makes cricket different than baseball. You have to read it off the bounce as well as in the air.

Usually, when a team bats first in a T20, they want to score at least at a rate of 8-10 runs per over in the initial 6 overs. This is because of the fielding restrictions in place, where only 2 fielders are allowed on the boundary. After that, the fielding team can have up to 5 fielders on the boundary. And the batting team wouldn't want to lose more than a couple of wickets in that powerplay. In the last 4-5 death overs, you can expect a run rate of 10-12 rpo, depending upon the pitch and the conditions, and also on how many wickets you've lost. Batting second, you can pace your innings and try to stay above the asking run rate. But usually, it's considered okay as long as the required run rate is below 10 runs per over. Despite being a fairly modern phenomenon, even T20 cricket has evolved over the years where you can expect the players to push these numbers to greater extremes, resulting in more exciting matches. Appreciate you taking on a new sport and finding the nuances. You will get a hang of this pretty soon, and you are going to love it. EDIT : In low scoring games like these -where the pitch is dicey, the pressure is on, the stakes are high - even chasing 6 runs per over can seem difficult sometimes. And we all saw what happened.

You have a very good understanding of this sport.

A cricket team is made by a combination of batters, all-rounders and bowlers just like in football there are strikers, mid fielder, defense and all of that so there are only 11 slots and top 6 or 7 of a cricket team consists of batters and all-rounders who can do both ball and bat and the rest 5 are bowlers so this is how wickets effects the game,Each time a wickets fall it effects the score of team because teams only have 10 wickets so every time a wickets falls the team lose a batter and there are only 7-8 batters in a team and the rest 4-5 players are bowlers who doesn't know to bat and if a team losses all there 10 wickets that's it that's end of the innings because all of their players got out

The pitch was criticized in that match. The ball was skidding a lot, which was making it very difficult to judge the bounce and turn on the ball. That's why there were so many catch outs without the batsman even trying to hit a big one.

Nassau County stadium is very slow pitch Ind vs pak ,119 runs NED vs SA 103 runs SA VS BAL 113 runs IRE vs IND 96 runs

Luke thanks for the effort.I was so excited to play cricket in South Carolina when I was in grad school.This is that same feeling.I can teach some of the subtilties of the game .should you need it. Now I am a Scientist Engineer ,,,still love the game.

Actually, Different pitch(strip on which batters run) has different behavior when it comes to bowl's swing & bounce.... So different grounds can have different runs scored by teams.... This pitch was tough to bat, so good score on that pitch was around 140

Hey bro you had mistaken , It's not compulsory that the player playing at no. 5 or 6 is a bad batsman no , batsman batting in the last about no. 6,7or 8 are called finisher. First two batsman are called opener and last batsman is called finisher . Both opener and finisher role is to make run in a good speed and other batsman have to just make run in medium pace and don't throw there wicket and remember ballers also come for bat but at last after the last batsman and that last batsman have the role of finishing

Love from India ❤

Great to see you react to cricket again :) Not sure if you are going to read this, but let me summarize a bit of what happened there: 1:35 - that was the wicket of Virat Kohli - India's best batsman. That wicket, that early was a big blow to India. This in itself increased the odds of a win in Pakistan's favor. It was that important. 2:06 - absolutely right 3:01 - that was the second wicket - of Indian captain Rohit Sharma. He was the one who hit an effortless 6 off Shaheen (one of the best Pakistani bowlers) in the very first over. So another very good batsman - dismissed. Losing these two important wickets this early - pakistan couldn't have a better start than this. 4:29 - right, 72 for 3 wickets under 9.2 overs - that was great for pakistan. You are right about the projection as well - at this rate India would be 140-170+ (since the last 5 overs teams often accelerate) But the score India has here is nothing to sneeze at either. It was a good score at this point - for India. 6:10 - no they weren't two straight wickets. These are the highlights - if you look at the overs - they came in two different overs. Batsmen sometimes get foxed into hitting bad shots that go straight to the bowler / fielder - it's quite common. 8:53 - yes, india lost all 10 wickets before the 20th. This was the LOWEST total for india against Pakistan, ever - in a T20 match. 120 runs is just about a run a ball - which is very easy &doable - esp in a T20. 10:37 - yes, 43/1 - at 8.1 overs was great for Pak. They needed a run a ball. And they were at 43 runs for 49 balls - with only one wicket down. They were totally in control. BUT, remember - India at ~9.2 overs was already at 72 runs - so India had scored at a higher rate, but lost more wickets, leading to a collapse in the end. 13:26 - that was the wicket of Rizwan - a very imp batsman. The batsmen to come after him weren't so good. So this increased the odds in India's favor at this point. This was the wicket that turned the game. At this stage (before the wicket), Pakistan had 92% odds of winning. 13:44 - 18 for 7 with the lower order batsmen - is extremely difficult. It takes a near miracle to do. It's possible, and the batsmen there (Naseem and Shaheen) have done it - they have hit sixes in the last over to win. 15:09 - yes, Pakistan let it slip with 92% odds of winning - to losing it. A nail-biter of a match. We don't get to witness such close ones all the time. And for it to be an India-Pakistan, world cup match - wow!

Quality of pitch, wind, clouds plays important role in cricket

You are learning pretty well..

The New York pitch was wet so it really messed up with India’s batting but then we went on to use the same pitch to dismantle there batting order. The fact is though Pakistan had an easier pitch as by their batting the pitch had dried a little bit but our bowlers still did an exceptional job getting us the win

Wickets matter a lot especially during the first half of either sides innings because your best batters are going to make up first half of the side. You dont want to be in a posjtion where you lose half the side without too many runs on the board. The rest half also called the "tail" cant gaurantee a solid score and more often than not they will fall in quick succession without adding much to the score. The chasing team i.e. team playing the second half of the game can pace the innings much easier for lower scores.

BROTHER u are correct after 6-7 wickets down bowlers come to bat and they dont have much to contribute .. 2) INDIA AND AUS are worlds best team in cricket from last 30 years... so EVEN getting 120 runs from 120 balls is not easy against this teams..3) WORLDS current best and consistent bowler in all three formats test odi and T20 is J. BUMRAH from INDIA so he made comeback possible and whole team supported well...4) GETTING 100 runs in last 10 overs is also possible in T20 and is very frequent also then they couldnt get 47 runs from 47 balls imagine level of INDIA BOWLING AND FIELDING ..5) IN HISTORY OF WORLD CUP INDIA DOMINATED PAKISTAN ALL OVER FROM START ..IN ODI WORLD CUP INDIA NVR LOST TO PAK IN 8 MATCHES TOTALLY PLAYED TILL NOW 8-0 ODI WORLD CUP IS EVERY 4 YEAR ..... AND IN T20 WORLD CUP OUT OF 8 MATCHES PLAYED TILL TODAY INDIA ONLY LOST ON MATCH SO SCORE IS INDIA 7 - PAK 1 AND T20 WORLD CUP IS EVERY 2 YEARS

I'm Cássio and I'm brazilian and I'll tell you about a few reasons why Brazil hasn't won a worldcup in such a long time. There's a lot of pressure but Neymar has been the lone star of this generation and had to become the creative midfielder for Brazil (the top assistant for Neymar is Oscar, last time he assisted Ney was in 2014). Neymar is top tier historicaly in the national team, the one with most assists ever, Delicious Vinicius is an amazing player but still not in the same league. 2018 and 2022 Brazil played better than Belgium and Croatia and lost and that's just why football is so amazing and addictive, when the F-ing ball rebounds midway to the goal sucks when it's against you and makes you explode when it's for your team. Sometimes the ball doesn't get inside the goal, no matter how many times you try In 2022 Tite started Paqueta in the worldcup as a second midfielder to have Neymar articulating in the midfield and just Casemiro holding back. He had never started a game like this before, Brazil would have Casemiro, Bruno Guimaraes and Neymar in the midfield (Paqueta is the third man of the midfield) and Neymar closer to the goal and free to help the team wherever needed and that's on Tite. When your two defensive midfielders charge on minutes before the end of the game when Neymar has the ball, the score is 1 nil and we were going to the semifinals and there was no need for them to charge on and we lose the ball, they were There's indeed a lot of pressure, you can feel the pressure when Neymar scored the penalty to win the first Olympic title for Brazil. In general, brazilian players come from devastatingly poor places and lacks rational decisions for being so emotional. And to end my case, Neymar would be a starter in the 2002 worldcup title, now we have Vini, Rodrygo and Endrick to help out, I will always be positive because the quality of all the national teams have gone down, it's not just about Brazil 2014 a colombian almost broke Neymar's back and we had no other way planed to play without him and THAT happened. 2010 we had what was left from 2002 players (most of them were out of shape) and when we lost Elano, due to an ankle injury in a game, we had no other player who could do what he did in 2006 we had the dreamteam and a few of the best players already out of shape and no organization during the concentration, the month before the worldcup, the public was allowed to much access to the players, no one actually concentrated for the competition due to too many distractions There was never a worldcup without Brazil and we have more titles than anyother national team, we are favorites in all bet houses in all the worldcups because of that the saddest of them, the only accomplishment that we are actually proud for "being known as" that is a good thing, Brazil is not very known for good things in general I love your channel, I hope you read all of this. As a player it's easier to destroy a play than to create a chance, but it's funnier to create. You have to do both, no matter what position you play as

In T-20 you have to score 150+ if u have to win the match (more runs in less ball) In ODI if u make 300+ scores that is defendable (equal amount of runs and ball) In Test, if u don't loose wicket that's leads to win (less run in a higher no of ball) wicket matters in test format because there is no limit in overs

@Luke’s Sports Academy- there are 10 wickets total ..therefor there will be 5 good batsman 3 allrounder which are good batsman and also good bowler ..and 3 pro bowlers ......only runs are matters ....if you loos wikcets early means good batman are out .... and low quaility batsman cant bat good.. so its a mixture ..

some terminologies for you if a batter gets out on 0 then its called a duck if he gets out on first ball then its golden duck three consecutive wickets for a bowler means hat trick

India isn't amateur bro ,it's just that the pitch was so bad for batting and India actually managed to get highest on that pitch . Believe they are gonna win this world cup 🍵

Also the wickets are important because if you have 10 outs before 20 allotted overs you're innings is ends right there

Luke realizing why this is the greatest rivalry in sports!

As a baseball player I have enjoyed learning cricket. My Pakistani friends care in shock. By the way have you checked out the marking of Diego in '82?

thats why ppl say cricket is a unpredictable game

In cricket we depend on the pitch for a good game ..right now New York pitches arent good for T20 at all a shout out to ICC about this 😢😢😢

wickets depends upon your team combination eg ;there are 11 players in a team 5 batters 5 bowlers and 1 keepers so if you lose two early wickets that means you have 3 batters left you still have 7 wickets left but bowlers can't bat i mean they had to bat but they can't play like real batters with technique and class they so it depends on the team you are playing

Strip /pitch matters the most . NY pitcher is bowlers friendly

It's not about batsman quality, everyone has a role to play. They are all good batsmen. Except for bowlers their primary role is to bowl.

India's bowling line-up is op

it depends it happens many times that the bowling team takes a lot of quick wickets.

You know ‘run rate’ in cricket that needs to maintain while chasing the score . India smartly keep the Pakistan run rate down from 12th over and choke the Pakistan team. It is smart captaincy by Indian captain using the bowlers and fielders and hard to get each 1 run.

Pitch is helping bowlers.... not batsmen.... 😂😂😂😂

6:54 not straight it was a highlights so they always show only 4,6 and out only in highlights to make it short , they show a 3:30 hr game in 10 min lol

In general you can say that number of runs a team can score is inversely proportional to number of wickets that has fallen. There are exceptions. for example, you can check Maxwell innings in last ODI world cup but in general this is the case.

Watch India vs america it’s going to be a tough game for both teams

119 is a pretty bad T20 score anywhere else in the world but by the looks of it, the New York pitch makes you earn every run, a real nightmare for batters, 😳🏏

just wanted to ask, does reacting to videos with the overlay works, isnt it still getting blocked??

@lukessportsacademy

16 күн бұрын

Yeah it works for me

bold out is when the bowler is able to hit the wickets. not bowled out but bold out.

The pitch plays a major role in every match ....the pitches in america are normally the type used in a one day match as t20 format is a short format so a flat pitch is preffered everywhere ...where the batters can put up some show but here the show is put up by the bowlers that is why every team you see playing in new yirj cannot score more than 130 or 140 ........but pakistan being themselves are always a meme stock in the feilding department but here they loterally forgot how to bat and batted as if they are playing a smaller team and our bowlers showed what they really can do being the best team in the world #indiaisbest ......so that is why this much runs were enuf for these pitches

6:58 if i have to explain you this in footballing terms a wicket is equivalent to a goal scored in football, that's rare

2:37 Also If your team is bowling and gets 10 wickets of the opposition team then they cant bat, and your team does need to ball further even if there are overs remaining.

This is not historic comeback bro..... it happens always 😅😂

Why did u mention "Video Blocked" ?

Same thing happened in BANGLADESH VS SOUTH AFRICA match. That was also in this ground

Towards the last it's easy to loose wickets because batsmen are gone and bowlers are playing

Losing wickets early is never good. But the New York pitch has been so bad- uneven bounce, slowness and extra grip on the pitch. It's hard to bat on. That's why all games on it have been exceptionally low-scoring. So 119 was actually a defensible total. A lot of people think that it was too low but that's not true on this pitch. 137 is the highest score on this pitch yet. You have to adjust your scoring expectations based on the pitch. Just yesterday, SA defended 114 against Bangladesh in New York. India was never out of the game. Pakistan made mistakes but frankly, it was always going to be a challenge to chase down 120 here

a team needs batters and bowlers. some great batters cannot bowl as same for bowlers some great bowlers would be shit with bat, a few maybe allrounders who are good at both(its rare to come by). when batting they bat one by one till all are out or overs are done. when bowling all 11 players go to field one bowls one keeps rest fields, when an over(6ball)are done another one bowls and first bowler replaces him in fielding position. (In t20 cricket no bowler is allowed to bowl more than 4 overs hence every team should have a minimum of 5 people to bowl the whole of 20 overs)

TBF both team chocked that day but Pakistan discovered the next level of choking. Also the pitch was horrible for every match played there. They should have excluded the new York ground from World Cup entirely.

If 10 players are out your term of batting is finished whether or not your overs are over

Highlights doesn't shows dot ball and single runs, so it was showing only wickets as there was no boundary in between

The way I see it, this pitch in New York is unpredictable...

Correct. That first wicket fall coming so soon was not good at all and that to of the greatest batsman alive.

Generally there are 6 batters and 5 bowlers and some of them can do both Your top 6 are pure batters so getting them out is very good for bowling team. Then there can be a few all rounders who can do both then there are generally 3-4 pure bowlers at last who almost can't bat. If a batter is out he can't come back so when a bowling team takes a wicket the batters start playing defensively as they have very few batters left after that. So wickets are important to keep the batting team in check If you loose 10 wickets your inning is over. You overreact on wickets early on. They are very common in cricket. Getting out very early without getting much runs is not that much big deal. Yeah you lose a batter but it happens.

@garvthakur7662

16 күн бұрын

Pakistan lost because they played too defensively. They tried to protect the wickets but doing this they played very defensive and didn't get much runs

If ball rolles on ground or bounce before getting cross or touch boundary so it called four but if ball get out of boundary straight in air it called six just like home run in baseball ⚾

For the information!! Pakistan has never won against india in the World Cup it's 8-0 in 50 overs world cup and 7-1 in t20 wc, also india is the world's number 1 cricket team.

12:14 Exactly

The funny thing was the win predictor. As the India chances to win this game was 8 % and pakistan was 92

How did they loose this? Answer:- "Pakistan just doing Pakistani things"😂😂

4:33 yeah

Okay here are some interesting facts again... In the LBW scenario the umpire said NO.. but Indian team took DRS ( Decision Review System) but we Indians call it Dhoni Review System It's a different story for that you have to see the MS Dhoni Review compilation.. Okay so The DRS is taken by Indian team and if you see the full match you will get to see how the technology is helping to decide the LBW how the ball will turn and will it hit the wickets or not? - Yes the Pakistani team was in full dominating situation in the middle of the match but there is a saying here if you have a bad luck a dog will bite you even if you sitting on a camel...

If you are defending runs and successfully defend than you win by the runs suppose team A scored 110 and B scored 100 than you win by 10 runs and if team B chases that score while losing 3 wickets lets suppose than you win by 7 wickets so thats another way why wickets matter. In conclusion if you chase the total than you win by wickets and if you defend the total than you win by runs! And next part if you see the scoreboard in the middle it says run rate which means thats the runs you need to score per over to successfully reach the total at the end of 20 overs so players also have to make sure that those runrate do not go high as it build pressure towards the end and try to maintain the run rate!

Actually Sometimes the innings also depends on the pitch condition.At new york The pitch ( the yellowish area where the ball is thrown while bowling)was more suitable for Bowlers and the highest score in that stadium till now is near to 130. So 120 was still a problem for Pakistan but yeah the way they started They just didn't want to win thanks to their ultra defensive mindset and the discipline of oyr Indian bowlers especially Bumrah we win

Man, do whatever you like. Don't do anything which you're least interested in. What I mean is simple: I, as viewer, will be more interested to see the reaction of someone who understands the rules and situation of a match rather than someone who doesn't understand and kind of confused. I know you're trying hard to kick your adrenaline up to make your viewers happy, but it's not working.

Yea, the pitch yesterday was shitty for batsmen. It was a bowlers pitch. Plus, due to the rains and higher humidity the ball was swinging like crazy. But the batsmen really played crappy yesterday. Pakistan should have won with such a low target but then bowlers like Bumrah used their slingshot shoulders to bowl all of them out ultimately ensuring that India won by 6 runs ! In cricket there is always a slip b/w the cup and the lip !

Luke, if you look at the overs when they play those shots you will understand why Pakistan lost

46 runs from 46 ball its easy chase in T20i. Last Year virat kohli chase down 50 runs in 18 balls vs pakistan in worldcup t20..

captaincy matters and pitch too😂

its not 4 straight wickets... remember you are watching a 15 min match highlights video (of 3 hours plus match). So the video only shows only some important events (like 4s, 6s outs, catches and great fielding shots) of the match. So, if you are watching highlights video.. it kind of looks as thought 4 wickets fell one of the other straight. But in reality... its not the case. You could pause the vide... check the score every time a wicket fell. that way you know the wickets didn't fall one after the other straight.