Amazingly accurate clock finally recognised after 300 years - Guinness World Records

Ойын-сауық

A pendulum clock based on an 18th century theory dismissed at the time, has been recognised by Guinness World Records for its accuracy.
Subscribe for more: bit.ly/subscribetoGWR
Proving perhaps to have been too visionary for its times, “Clock B” has been awarded with a world record for most accurate mechanical clock with a pendulum swinging in free air, vindicating the vision of its original designer John Harrison
Work on Clock B was started in 1975 by Martin Burgess, based on a design by 18th Century clockmaker Harrison, who is also famously renowned as the finder of longitude at sea.
Welcome to the official Guinness World Records KZread channel!
If you're looking for videos featuring the world's tallest, shortest, fastest, longest, oldest and most incredible things on the planet, you're in the right place.
LIKE us on Facebook: / guinnessworldrecords
FOLLOW us on Twitter: / gwr
Find out more: www.guinnessworldrecords.com/
Add us to your G+ circles: www.google.com/+guinnessworldr...
#GWR #GuinnessWorldRecords #worldrecord

Пікірлер: 90

  • @badpurvis1
    @badpurvis13 жыл бұрын

    So, you made your statement. May we get a good look at the clock, please? And, perhaps an explanation of its mechanical feature that Mr. Harrison invented?

  • @user-pj8uj7wx3s

    @user-pj8uj7wx3s

    Ай бұрын

    It's based on an 18th century theory because Harrison knew the necessary conditions for the pendulum to be isochronous. However it was rather impractical for use in regular clocks, so at the time it wasn't taken up.

  • @pizzaboy3946
    @pizzaboy39462 жыл бұрын

    At a rough guess, if this were built when Harrison invented it and kept running continuously, it would have lost about 15 minutes by now.

  • @TheNightshadePrince

    @TheNightshadePrince

    9 ай бұрын

    Yes but not servicing the clock after several years would make it no longer work correctly and eventually stop it, also not servicing clocks can damage them. It would have had to be stopped, serviced and possible repaired several times in those three centuries. :)

  • @andrewbarrett1537
    @andrewbarrett15372 жыл бұрын

    Another thing I *think* he invented, was the “gridiron” pendulum, with a rod made up of many rods of opposing metals, so that some shrink while others expand with temperature changes, hopefully canceling each other out and thus keeping the pendulum’s length (and thus rate) constant despite temperature changes.

  • @XMarkxyz

    @XMarkxyz

    2 жыл бұрын

    There is no metal that shrinks with increasing temperature, but the rods are arranged in a way that they expand in opposite direction so while a couple expand downward the others expand upward thus keeping the same the lengh of the pendulum arm. On a side note an even more precise clock with a similar concept used in astronomical observatories was fitted with a glass cylinder filled of mercury as the weight for the pendulum so with increasing temperature the mercury expanded very precisely like in a thermometer and so accomplishing the same result of keeping the point of balance at constant lengh

  • @Mars-zgblbl

    @Mars-zgblbl

    8 ай бұрын

    Harrison was not rewarded well. The British navy effectively reneged on its promise of a reward.

  • @TimpBizkit

    @TimpBizkit

    15 күн бұрын

    @@XMarkxyz It must have been difficult to get the column of mercury rising further up the pendulum to cancel the lengthening effect and keep the center of mass as constant as possible.

  • @michaelbauers8800
    @michaelbauers88007 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic accuracy.

  • @jgergetz
    @jgergetz5 ай бұрын

    Get the book Longitude!!! Excellent work all about Harrison and his chronometers. Guaranteed wonderful read!

  • @truths.stranger5454
    @truths.stranger54546 жыл бұрын

    that's it? that just got me interested, and then none of it was explained. how does it work?

  • @elonmusk42

    @elonmusk42

    2 жыл бұрын

    It use atom maybe 🤔

  • @MichaelTvrdy

    @MichaelTvrdy

    25 күн бұрын

    @@elonmusk42 It's 300 years old...🤦

  • @Karma8Kami
    @Karma8Kami9 жыл бұрын

    Things like this makes me think the steam puck sci-fi worlds people create ae not really all that far fetched, an invention like this realised 150 years ago and mechanical devices would likely have been at an unimaginable stage today.

  • @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

    @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

    8 жыл бұрын

    While that is true, the development of the computer was a fundamentally more important invention, as any electro-mechanical control device can be accomplished with much more efficiency and precision with digital controllers and processors than Rube Goldberg mechanical devices

  • @Karma8Kami

    @Karma8Kami

    8 жыл бұрын

    Myanameis Beestingz Oh no doubt, but high capacity, compressed air revolvers and steam punk exoskeletons run on a crazy wood gassifier strapped to the mechs back does have it's own kind of special charm ^^

  • @levicassidy9312

    @levicassidy9312

    7 жыл бұрын

    are*

  • @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

    @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Karma8Kami Yeah there's a book called the Difference Engine which supposes Charles Babbage's ideas were implemented in the 19th century and brought about the computer age 100 years early via mechanical computers.

  • @andrewbarrett1537

    @andrewbarrett1537

    2 жыл бұрын

    On the one hand, yes; on the other hand, there is something to be said for processing that is completely parallel (not serial) and also mechanical.

  • @nukasnook1561
    @nukasnook156111 ай бұрын

    He also made clocks completely of wood ... the one in our family was still working last time it was spotted. Not to mention using clocks to create music ... Lucy timing.

  • @richardhodges3593
    @richardhodges35933 жыл бұрын

    John Harrison is my hero, he is one of the greatest men of all time from Lincolnshire. He should have been compensated by the Board of Longitude, if he was them maybe he would have had enough encouragement to complete his accurate clock. We owe a debt of gratitude to Martin Burgess, his contemporaries and Donald Saff at proving John Harrison's greatness.

  • @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

    @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

    2 жыл бұрын

    I believe he was eventually given the full prize, but he was very old by the time the reward was paid.

  • @andrewbarrett1537
    @andrewbarrett15372 жыл бұрын

    I think some of the key is in the “grasshopper” escapement Mr. Harrison invented. There should be some videos about this escapement elsewhere on KZread.

  • @watchguy79
    @watchguy794 жыл бұрын

    I love clocks and horology. Obsessed is more like it. This is beautiful..

  • @rowanshole

    @rowanshole

    Жыл бұрын

    It is covered thouroughly in the book 'Harrison Decoded': towards a perfect pendulum clock'. Oxford University Press 2020

  • @RollaArtis
    @RollaArtis2 жыл бұрын

    Sorry but the 'theory' wasn't dismissed at the time, it was the idea of a precision clock made of wood which this clock isn't.

  • @DaveDurant
    @DaveDurant9 жыл бұрын

    cc: Clickspring, who might find this interesting..

  • @StephenMortimer

    @StephenMortimer

    5 жыл бұрын

    nice to see another who knows of him

  • @mrbobythebro
    @mrbobythebro2 жыл бұрын

    People who read the book "longitude" know what's up

  • @Susseditout
    @Susseditout Жыл бұрын

    John Harrison, the forgotten man.

  • @amitpurushottam7661
    @amitpurushottam76613 жыл бұрын

    Have a nice day

  • @10thMorales
    @10thMorales2 жыл бұрын

    What clock brand?

  • @truths.stranger5454
    @truths.stranger54546 жыл бұрын

    how can a pendulum with a fixed radius move in a cycloidal curve? are you talking about the accuracy lost due to the bump the pendulum gets from the gear to return to its starting position instead of following it's normal path of motion, which is required to keep its period mathematically regular?

  • @FamilyGuy999

    @FamilyGuy999

    6 жыл бұрын

    To have a period of oscillation that doesn't depends on the amplitude of the pendulum (i.e. a second no matter if the pendulum lost energy over time), the end of the pendulum needs to approximate a sinusoidal path rather than a circular one. To do that, you just need a small oscillation angle/amplitude, if you zoom enough, a circle is very similar to a sine. What Harrison did was to use a bigger amplitude/angle, but the attach point of the pendulum also moves during the movement to compensate for it.

  • @michaelbauers8800

    @michaelbauers8800

    5 жыл бұрын

    Family guy had a nice answer. When you learn the pendulum formula in physics class, that's an ideal pendulum. For small enough amplitude ( how far it swings,) the period only depends on the length and gravity. When I say only depends on length and gravity, we are ignoring external effects like air currents, and temperature ( which can change the length of the pendulum.) This clock uses the ideas mentioned by familyguy999 and has a few more ideas. The clock uses a grasshopper escapement to regulate the movement, which is not the standard pendulum escapement ( you can google how it works.) The grasshopper is a low friction device, which means the escapement can be run without oil, which would have an effect as it ages, and due to temperature. It uses something called a remontoir ( sp?) which keeps the escapement powered, without the downsides associated with it being powered from the rest of the movement. Normally, the escapement locks and unlocks the movement while at the same time, getting a bit of energy from the movement from it's own power, such as a spring or pendulum. But there's downsides to that, so it's powered by a smaller remontoir spring, which is automatically kept "wound" by a mechanism driven from the clock's power source, for example a pendulum. That's all the info I have, and sorry if I explained it poorly.

  • @halnwheels

    @halnwheels

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@FamilyGuy999 Indeed, Harrison's pendulum design is not a fixed radius due to what you have said about its attachment. As far as the grasshopper escapement, the lignum wood material he used eliminated the need for periodic lubrication of the escapement mechanism.

  • @donaldasayers

    @donaldasayers

    4 жыл бұрын

    The pendulum suspension; a thin flat spring or silken thread, instead of hanging free, swings between cycloidal cheeks or arcs, the pendulum then swings in the involute of a cycloid, which by mathematical coincidence is also a cycloid. By this means Harrison was able to use a much larger pendulum swing than otherwise could be used. A circular pendulum suffers from "circular error", where different amplitudes have different times of swing. This change of period is smaller for small circular arcs and this is the solution usually adopted. A cycloidal pendulum has theoretically equal periods for different amplitude so a bigger swing can be used. The other solution is to keep the amplitude absolutely constant, which is the solution adopted by Philip Woodward in his clock W5 which also easily beat the 1 second in a hundred days accuracy.

  • @donaldasayers

    @donaldasayers

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@FamilyGuy999 The shape of the path of the pendulum should be cycloid not sinusoid.

  • @centerpoint643
    @centerpoint643 Жыл бұрын

    How were they able to determine Harrisons' H4 clock was accurate to one second a month?

  • @classydays43
    @classydays433 ай бұрын

    I love that Horology lost 150 years just by ignoring Mr. Harrison, like the science of timekeeping was too full of itself to recognise a new idea. They could have very well struck out against the Quartz Crisis with this and they could not because they did not. I hope that last century or two was an educational one.

  • @andyp5899
    @andyp58992 жыл бұрын

    The presenter is a bit inaccurate Harrison did not come up with the idea of calculating longitude by means of a time difference, which he implies. That should not detract from Harrison's work.

  • @TiyoKendo
    @TiyoKendo6 жыл бұрын

    i like this

  • @fridericusrex7042
    @fridericusrex70426 жыл бұрын

    How is the number -7/8?

  • @AH-yg2dj

    @AH-yg2dj

    4 жыл бұрын

    Fridericus Rex -0.875 seconds per day

  • @condoralpha87

    @condoralpha87

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@AH-yg2dj rather, -0.8 s per 100 days : -0.008 s per day.

  • @8yearold280
    @8yearold2807 жыл бұрын

    I prefer the *sun*

  • @michaelbauers8800

    @michaelbauers8800

    5 жыл бұрын

    That's great when you can see the sun. Which is not true at night, nor on overcast days

  • @dububro

    @dububro

    4 жыл бұрын

    Not helpful if you don't know your longitude.

  • @viejaspeliculasfilipinas3621

    @viejaspeliculasfilipinas3621

    3 жыл бұрын

    Which sun completes it's revolution in 365.24 days

  • @antigen4
    @antigen43 жыл бұрын

    because class bigotry got in the way as it did (and does) so often in the british isles

  • @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

    @stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

    2 жыл бұрын

    So true. This is a problem in the U.S. also. So many brilliant minds are utterly turned off by the pomposity and 'Wokeness' of the upper class in universities these days that they avoid them like the plague.

  • @rowanshole

    @rowanshole

    Жыл бұрын

    A problem evident in comments elsewhere to this video😂

  • @nekrohatred9547
    @nekrohatred95472 жыл бұрын

    >tfw the English dude looks like a stereotype

  • @wilfredoagudo4589
    @wilfredoagudo45899 жыл бұрын

    Can you do who can hold there breath the longest

  • @MrKirkKS

    @MrKirkKS

    7 жыл бұрын

    @ Black Order: How long can you watch youtube videos without writing stupid comments?

  • @talonwilliamson459
    @talonwilliamson4599 жыл бұрын

    1st

  • @theepicsealshow123

    @theepicsealshow123

    9 жыл бұрын

    No you're not dumbass

  • @viejaspeliculasfilipinas3621

    @viejaspeliculasfilipinas3621

    3 жыл бұрын

    Such like a brat Go ahead, celebrate for being first yourself

  • @aloksachu123
    @aloksachu1239 жыл бұрын

    Second

  • @cole212
    @cole2129 жыл бұрын

    8

  • @jugo6052
    @jugo60525 жыл бұрын

    It's actually from the Serbian king

  • @mikaeljohansson3453
    @mikaeljohansson34533 жыл бұрын

    Those teeth could also be in the book!

  • @madikate9363
    @madikate93639 жыл бұрын

    FIRST

  • @Renji170
    @Renji1709 жыл бұрын

    first

  • @kairivera5779
    @kairivera57799 жыл бұрын

    6th boi

  • @howler6490
    @howler64902 жыл бұрын

    Dreadful waste of time...

  • @donaldasayers
    @donaldasayers7 жыл бұрын

    Hmm. Firstly Harrison never made this clock 2 it uses materials not available to Harrison; advanced thermoplastics and most importantly an invar pendulum. 3 It has no compensation for atmospheric pressure, which most horologists, including Philip Woodward (Who also made a better than 1 second in a hundred days clock.) would say is essential for this order of accuracy. So what conclusions can we draw from this clock, not much really, only that we can, in the 21st century, build a better pendulum clock, than 300 years ago and that the result of the 100 day test was probably a fluke.

  • @jorgkirchhof7225

    @jorgkirchhof7225

    6 жыл бұрын

    Donald Sayers you are wrong in many ways. Harrison has invented a temperature compensation. It is called gridiron pendulum rod. Burgess has used Invar instead, because it is easier to get good results with it. 2. Harrison invented a technique to compensate for atmospheric errors. For this purpose he has used a pendulum with large swing amplitude and he has added cheeks to control the circular error. He feeds the clock with constant energy by using a remontoir. Then the amplitude of the pendulum is a function of air density which depends on air preasure. When the cheeks have the right proportions, then the atmospheric error and the circular error cancel each other out. Burgess uses this approach on his clock A and clock B. This is a demonstration of Harrisons theory and this is also the reason why his clock can show an accuracy which was before only reached when the pendulum is inside a vacuum chamber.

  • @michaelbauers8800

    @michaelbauers8800

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@jorgkirchhof7225 great answer Jorg, thanks. That was my understand as well. They also kept his grasshopper escapement, which needs no lubrication, removing a source of error ( like how George Daniels co-axial did the same for wristwatches.)

  • @beautifulsmall

    @beautifulsmall

    5 жыл бұрын

    Love the W5 Woodward clock . My own right time. great read. , also Accurate clock pendulums by Matthys , made a pendulum , just need a mechanism.

  • @donaldasayers

    @donaldasayers

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@jorgkirchhof7225 The gridiron pendulum exhibits slip stick phenomenon as the various parts change length to compensate, these lead to timekeeping which has well defined steps in the rate graph, you can't get 1 sec in a hundred days with a gridiron. So exactly what has been proved? It's not a direct copy of a Harrison clock and it uses different materials not available to Harrison. It only proves that Harrison's design principles were sound enough, but they were a dead end and not followed by subsequent clockmakers.

  • @jorgkirchhof7225

    @jorgkirchhof7225

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@donaldasayers copy & paste of claims of Wikipedia articles where no cited sources exist is not a good idea. You cite wrong. The wikipedia article about Gridiron pendulum talks about disadvantages and mixes up two things. First the friction in the holes: this has been discovered at old gridiron pendulums where corrosion lead to blocking (read e.g. Derek Roberts "Precision Pendulum Clocks - The quest for accurate timekeeping". These described "jumps" are a problem of some zinc iron gridiron pendulums. Zinc itself delivers these jumps when the zinc has bad purity. In serious books about precision pendulum clocks this is very well explained.

  • @steveuphill3795
    @steveuphill37952 жыл бұрын

    more blah blah blah and more about the presetnters, yet no real photos of the clock just bits and carefully removed detail. 👎🙁👎🙁👎🙁

Келесі