Marvelous! What an elegant touch, with such clarity and musicality! Thank you!
@jelt1108 жыл бұрын
He took k450- a stuccatic piece by all other interpretations- and turned it into a sweet melodious interpretation. Scarlatti would be proud. I asked a guy in a record store for something that would get me into baroque. It took me over a decade to appreciate what a gift he had given me. Both Scarlatti and Weissenberg. Nothing could have surpassed this, except perhaps Landowska. How few will ever appreciate this. This is what i want played at my funeral, Weissenberg just really gets it.
@notsodivinemsm8936
Ай бұрын
Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli and Christian Zacharias are also wonderful Scarlatti interpreters.
@rasteen9996 жыл бұрын
No one has ever played K 109 with such artistry in my opinion
@dmburke0075 жыл бұрын
I wholehearted agree with this comment. He knows how to play a song beautifully. I Used to follow him and saw him in NYC, Cincinnati etc.. Got nice autographs from him. You should hear his interpretation of the Chopin concerto and the Prokofiev concerto for white keys with S Oshawa. Unbelievable.
@Kristi3141598 жыл бұрын
this transformed my life. literally. As skillful and passionate as Landowska.
@davidlee965310 жыл бұрын
Weissenberg as far as I am concerned, comes as close to pianistic perfection as can be achieved. He is without peer.
@NotSoDivineMsM
10 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't go quite that far until you have heard Christian Zacharias play Scarlatti which, in my opinion, is about as close to perfection for Scarlatti on the piano as it gets. If I were to rank the top for Scarlatti, it would be Zacharias, Michelangeli, Weissenberg and Babayan in that order.
@lenamcginnis5168
8 жыл бұрын
+David Lee YOu are absolutely correct. Fire and Ice, the best pianist ever!!!
@QMPhilosophe
8 жыл бұрын
I agree...though Richter may be included in that category.
@matthewcoldicutt5951
7 жыл бұрын
I agree, David. In the works I have heard him play it is as if the technical challenges of the compositions are as nothing, leaving him to embroider his playing with all the qualities that give spirit and tenderness to his interpretations
@zwischenzug53245 жыл бұрын
Fantastic
@Altagraciadeorituco9 жыл бұрын
Qué belleza!
@thorenjohn5 жыл бұрын
k.247, wow.
@klowerkorange42klowerkoran308 жыл бұрын
One of the kindest friendliest and coldest of all pianists. A metronome in playing.
@harryandruschak28438 жыл бұрын
Thank you for uploading these gems :)
@dariodangelo89387 жыл бұрын
The best Scarlatti on a pianoforte...imho.
@notsodivinemsm8936
Ай бұрын
Do not leave out Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli or Christian Zacharias for Scarlatti.
@stevegrund74586 жыл бұрын
This sounds to me like a harpsichord interpretation. As such, I find it interesting, well played, and historically illuminating. Although Scarlatti was familiar with early forte-pianos, and approved of them, he probably wrote mainly for harpsichord. So, although it may be that this interpretation is closer to how Scarlatti played it than most modern renditions, I don't care for it much artistically. Whether or not Scarlatti was able to bring out the exquisite beauty of this piece on the instruments of his time, the exquisite beauty of this composition is rare, and there is no need for us to inherit the technical limitations to which Scarlatti was bound. This piece plays better as a piano piece, in my opinion, than as a harpsichord piece. If a piece is composed ahead of its time, one might play it in the context of the time in which it was conceived, not just in the context of the time it was composed! Again, I am glad this recording was posted. I learned from it. It is a good interpretation. It is just not my favorite way to play or hear this piece.
@jelt110
Жыл бұрын
The only similar tempo and variation I've heard like he does on k450 is by Landowska (as L338). This is the definition of mastery: he does not re-create the music, but interprets it with his own insight and learnings.
@obermax258 жыл бұрын
This seems to be very fast. most notably K 247 would profit from a substantial reduction in speed.
@Carvin06 жыл бұрын
Very, very nice. But I really don't like the cross-fading. Silence between pieces would be better.
Пікірлер: 26
Weissemberg chiude il cerchio con questa interpretazione....Un capolavoro assoluto. Marco Rotondi
Intelligent, accessible, engaging and beautiful Scarlatti. An amazing performance.
なんて美しく、綺麗な音色でしょう! 正確無比で魂の演奏です。 ワイセンベルクさん、大好きです!ラフマニノフやブラームスピアノ協奏曲のようなダイナミックな演奏も素晴らしいですが、このようなスカルラッティの澄み切った優しい音色の演奏はワイセンベルクさんの真骨頂です✨ どんな音楽批評家が何を言おうとワイセンベルクさんの芸術家として尊敬しています❤
Marvelous! What an elegant touch, with such clarity and musicality! Thank you!
He took k450- a stuccatic piece by all other interpretations- and turned it into a sweet melodious interpretation. Scarlatti would be proud. I asked a guy in a record store for something that would get me into baroque. It took me over a decade to appreciate what a gift he had given me. Both Scarlatti and Weissenberg. Nothing could have surpassed this, except perhaps Landowska. How few will ever appreciate this. This is what i want played at my funeral, Weissenberg just really gets it.
@notsodivinemsm8936
Ай бұрын
Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli and Christian Zacharias are also wonderful Scarlatti interpreters.
No one has ever played K 109 with such artistry in my opinion
I wholehearted agree with this comment. He knows how to play a song beautifully. I Used to follow him and saw him in NYC, Cincinnati etc.. Got nice autographs from him. You should hear his interpretation of the Chopin concerto and the Prokofiev concerto for white keys with S Oshawa. Unbelievable.
this transformed my life. literally. As skillful and passionate as Landowska.
Weissenberg as far as I am concerned, comes as close to pianistic perfection as can be achieved. He is without peer.
@NotSoDivineMsM
10 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't go quite that far until you have heard Christian Zacharias play Scarlatti which, in my opinion, is about as close to perfection for Scarlatti on the piano as it gets. If I were to rank the top for Scarlatti, it would be Zacharias, Michelangeli, Weissenberg and Babayan in that order.
@lenamcginnis5168
8 жыл бұрын
+David Lee YOu are absolutely correct. Fire and Ice, the best pianist ever!!!
@QMPhilosophe
8 жыл бұрын
I agree...though Richter may be included in that category.
@matthewcoldicutt5951
7 жыл бұрын
I agree, David. In the works I have heard him play it is as if the technical challenges of the compositions are as nothing, leaving him to embroider his playing with all the qualities that give spirit and tenderness to his interpretations
Fantastic
Qué belleza!
k.247, wow.
One of the kindest friendliest and coldest of all pianists. A metronome in playing.
Thank you for uploading these gems :)
The best Scarlatti on a pianoforte...imho.
@notsodivinemsm8936
Ай бұрын
Do not leave out Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli or Christian Zacharias for Scarlatti.
This sounds to me like a harpsichord interpretation. As such, I find it interesting, well played, and historically illuminating. Although Scarlatti was familiar with early forte-pianos, and approved of them, he probably wrote mainly for harpsichord. So, although it may be that this interpretation is closer to how Scarlatti played it than most modern renditions, I don't care for it much artistically. Whether or not Scarlatti was able to bring out the exquisite beauty of this piece on the instruments of his time, the exquisite beauty of this composition is rare, and there is no need for us to inherit the technical limitations to which Scarlatti was bound. This piece plays better as a piano piece, in my opinion, than as a harpsichord piece. If a piece is composed ahead of its time, one might play it in the context of the time in which it was conceived, not just in the context of the time it was composed! Again, I am glad this recording was posted. I learned from it. It is a good interpretation. It is just not my favorite way to play or hear this piece.
@jelt110
Жыл бұрын
The only similar tempo and variation I've heard like he does on k450 is by Landowska (as L338). This is the definition of mastery: he does not re-create the music, but interprets it with his own insight and learnings.
This seems to be very fast. most notably K 247 would profit from a substantial reduction in speed.
Very, very nice. But I really don't like the cross-fading. Silence between pieces would be better.
I prefer Gilels K 247.