Clickbait! There is no A390 in the works. Airbus already have a rival to 777x - it's called the A350.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment ❤

@Pakistan_airforce

Ай бұрын

Bruh bruh he's literally write and ur like thx for the comment. What a npc. Well Airbus could just make a bigger a350 and maybe call it the a390 but the a350 is the perfect size yeah I don't think 2e need a bigger varient

@Recoverlerbotines

Ай бұрын

Brow hating and he’s like thx for hating💀💀💀💀💀💀

@TrainDdorf

Күн бұрын

But the A350 is worse

@Pakistan_airforce

Күн бұрын

@@TrainDdorf you get ur a** outta here

Source? for me this is BS and it is the last time i will click on anything FLIG AVIA

Airbus’s use of composite materials was a smart move.

@Recoverlerbotines

Ай бұрын

Boeing is also using them on 787 and 777X wings

. 0:20 . A390 Three stories?

Stupid clickbait... Really man?

Who is shocked? The videomaker?

It’s impressive how Airbus has already delivered over 600 A350s.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

Yeah thanks for your feedback

The A350’s cargo capability is a significant plus for airlines.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

That’s right

The A350’s efficiency is a big win for airlines looking to cut costs.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

Yeah 🛫🛫🛫

The A350's advanced technology is what makes it stand out.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

✈️✈️✈️✈️

Boeing’s delay with the 777X has given Airbus a huge advantage.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

Thanks for feedback

Pretty sure this is bullshi but not completely cuz this is kind off what Airbus is going to do in the future like environmentally friendly engines

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

✈️✈️✈️ thanks for your feedback

The A3100 has 6 uppercut deck

Conneries!

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

✈️

6:33 It is named MS-21. МС-21 is written in Cyrillic alphabet. Acronym means 'Магистральные Самолёты 21 века' or 'Long-haul aircrafts of 21 century'.

I don’t know. It is too soon since the A350 started their service. I will go with the A350Neo name and reserve the A360 for a groundbreaking technology BUT that is not totally convincing people. So, when people have totally confident in this new technology, you can use the A370, A390, and (prepare yourself) the A395.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

thanks for your feedback

Followed your channel but I can’t stand the clickbait anymore.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

✈️

I wonder if the 777X will eventually surpass the A350 in any area.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment ✈️✈️✈️

Boeing has a lot of catching up to do if they want to compete with the A350.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment

✈️

A381 like A321 maybe

Show me the proof

When the plane is using less fuel, there will be more planes, and the total consumption of fuel will increase.

@CrownRider

Ай бұрын

The amount of fuel, per mile or kilometer, per passenger is much more interesting.

@elbuggo

Ай бұрын

@@CrownRider When the fuel consumption per seat is decreased, you will increase used seats and will need more planes. And those planes will use more fuel than was used before the fuel improvement. Is it that hard to grasp this?

@CrownRider

Ай бұрын

@@elbuggo No, it's not hard to grasp. Just a different way of looking at it. Don't you see that?

@johnchristmas7522

Ай бұрын

Incorrect, more planes come about with more passengers, hence the original A380 (one aircraft instead of two) plus customers drive the aircraft demand on how they fly and where to. Airlines buy as less Aircraft as possible. They are hugely expensive. They only make a profit while in the air-not on the ground. Fuel is changing too, many new aircraft will be flying with fuel made from plants instead of oil. Its easy to be critical, without an answer or solution. Airlines and Engine manufacturers are spending billions on trying to go greener and still keep air fares within reach. All these advancements takes years or even decades, not weeks. Think of the emerging markets where there are no green requirements (China) Worry about their non green signature, its the largest!!!

@elbuggo

Ай бұрын

@@johnchristmas7522 RE: many new aircraft will be flying with fuel made from plants That is a delusional pipe dream, and totally pointless. Without cheap fuel, there will be no mass flying. Again, if a new plane use less fuel, there will be more tickets sold due to lower costs, and they will need more planes. Total consumption will then increase, and more polar bears on the North Pole will drown. Isn't that so?.

Absolutely stupid, A360 will come first not A390. Just because Airbus went straight to A380 and skipped out 3 aircraft doesn't mean they may as well go to A390

More nonsense from this channel 30 seconds was enough

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

✈️✈️✈️

Why don't they just skip A390 and go straight to A400. It sounds better.

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

yeah thanks for your comment

@sorgfaeltig

Ай бұрын

The Airbus A400 is already out. It's a four engine turboprop military transport plane.

Bro just ran out of video ideas😂

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

Not really, do you have any recommendations? 🤣🤣🤣

@Recoverlerbotines

Ай бұрын

@@FLIGAVIA can u make a video about the rise and fall of Douglas airplanes

While ultra long flights may be a goal in itself, these ultra long haul flights are rarely economical unless the airplane is configured with premium cabins only. Flying an airplane on an ultra long flight lasting 19-20 hours cannot be made economical, at least not today, if the airplane cabin layout is standard with 40-60 premium seats and the rest normal economy seats. The reason the ultra long haul flights can only be made economical with a fully premium seat cabin is fuel. For an ultra long haul flight, the airplane must be able to load much more fuel for the flight and that means a heavier airplane which again means a poor overall economy unless you can get the money in and earn a profit and that is only possible at the moment if the entire airplane cabin is configured with premium seats only.

bogus news.. MAKES ME SICK.....

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

✈️✈️✈️

Bullshit click bait

@FLIGAVIA

Ай бұрын

✈️✈️✈️