You hit nail on the head. "AI cannot replace the joy of painting"

@jeffreypostma6832

13 күн бұрын

Plus the skills you learn and the process you go through by actually producing an image, be it through painting or drawing, are much more valuable, as the AI is only focused on an end result. It lacks any kind of satisfaction, much in the same way as looking for stock images.

@tsh3083

10 күн бұрын

but it does affect the actual art industry and the ability for one to monetise their skill

@hocuspocus9713

8 күн бұрын

@@tsh3083 This is true, I used to be hyper focused on making a career in the field but now I am dropping it back down to a hobby and focusing on my current "boring" career.

@Dr.Kraig_Ren

6 күн бұрын

Ah yes. Joy gives you money to pay your rent right? And we are dumb for studying Medicine for 13 years to get a licence even though we never had "joy" in sleepless late night hospital shifts during PG and internship.

@timothy790110

6 күн бұрын

Joy of painting? I dont want it to replace the joy of getting paid.

I'd never pay money for AI art but I'll pay money for art made by a human soul.

@hArtyTruffle

24 күн бұрын

Same here.

@gundarsmiks4889

23 күн бұрын

Exactly. IfS it Ai made. It kinda ruins the point, if its an artwork.

@velvetbees

22 күн бұрын

I have generated thousands of AI images and I have also been a traditional artist for the last fifty years. You are on the right track. AI will never achieve the artistic merit and ingenuity of human made works of art. I find generating it fun and inspiring. But it has no "soul" (imho). It can come close, but it is not as good as human made art.

@Mooooty

22 күн бұрын

Sure you do, okay.

@gundarsmiks4889

22 күн бұрын

I'd pay for a fart!

Eric, your painting is 100%, and 10 times better than any AI photo etc 👍🧡

Please continue making videos. I just started painting and I bought brushes and paints as you instructed. You're a great teacher. I've also introduced your videos and a few others to low-income students who are interested in the arts but who cannot afford private lessons, or waste money on the wrong supplies. What you're doing is so valuable. Please come back.

@Cafewatercolor

23 күн бұрын

I'm so glad to hear it. I will indeed continue my video here. I am taking more rest this year but I won't leave youtube :)

@PlanetCat

11 күн бұрын

@@Cafewatercolorplease don’t man

Painting is all about joy, satisfaction, relaxing and focusing. Not one single AI will bring it to me. So I'm totally with you, only painting by myself can give it to me.

Never give up. Never surrender.

@Shattered3582

9 күн бұрын

exactly! AI will only win over human art if we all give up. the more we encourage people to get into art, the more choice companies and studios will have over AI

@Teal_Seal

7 күн бұрын

👍😄 💯

Eric, please don’t leave. You give me inspiration to paint.

AI will never be able to replace a human artist. I've toyed with AI image generation for a while now and have found it to be more miss than hit. It all comes down to this; AI lacks heart and soul. These can not be replaced by algorithms. Art is an expression of the heart and mind in an effort to communicate concepts, ideas, and feeling.

@pastuh

22 күн бұрын

The entire video compares images generated from text prompts, which obviously lack a human touch. However, he didn't try to generate an image directly by drawing and generating simultaneously. In that case, AI would respond to his every brushstroke, becoming an indispensable tool.

@armandogavilan1815

15 күн бұрын

Now I agree and you're right, in 10 years it will be as good or better than us.

@Paopao621

12 күн бұрын

The emotion will come from the prompt creator.

@armandogavilan1815

12 күн бұрын

@@Paopao621 HAHAHAHHAHAHAH good one, yeah a lot of emotion in a prompt HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAH

@Paopao621

12 күн бұрын

@@armandogavilan1815 I'm serious, the prompt creator will obviously input the right prompts to show emotion to the Ai generated image. An Inexperienced artist would draw just like an AI, putting emotion on the artwork is a different set of skills that an artist learns after a long time of creating art, since it's a different skill from the technicality of art, the prompt creator/writer could only focus on how they could put emotion to the image ignoring the technical side of art leaving it to the AI.

I agree with you, you cannot get the same fullfillment & enjoyment painting it yourself.

Art and artists are evolving as they always have and always will. Stay Creative!

Goodness, AI cannot interpret human emotion, creativity, experience. Keep going, Eric, don't let AI shadow YOU!

@wout123100

3 сағат бұрын

you are naieve, we are only at the beginning of ai, it will be indistinguisable in a few years.

I am so glad that you made this video and challenged AI produced paintings. You reminded me so much that the reason I wanted to become an artist was not to reproduce but to express the feelings invoked by my subject matter. This often is a matter of light vs. dark, contrast and feeling! That's one of the reasons I don't wish to paint photo realism. I want the viewer to catch a glimpse of what I saw that made me want to capture it in watercolor. Why else would anyone want to paint! Thank you for expressing what every artist should hear in the face of AI.

Painters gave up because photography? no. There's no reason to feel threatened to give up because AI exist. I found that its existence only has given more value to the process. Since everyone can have the final piece in few seconds we start to value what AI can't give: The artistic experience of the process, the pain, the struggle to find your own view and make it show up in a canvas. If someones gives up because AI exist, that person never truly loved art in first place.

Beautiful painting of a place where others want to go, as well as you. The peaceful feeling comes through in your art. I also visited your past videos this morning. There is a treasure trove worth investigating. Maybe others don't know about this, but I hope they take the time to explore. Follow your heart and enjoy your beautiful family. I only hope you miss your KZread family a little because we'll certainly miss you.

This has been a huge discussion in some groups I belong to on Facebook. I get being upset about folks buying AI, but.......there will still be waaaaaay more willing to aquire a hand painted creation! But also, there will be many that won't be able to know the difference😒and fall victim to buying "fake" art. Very frustrating. I adore your videos and art! Please don't stop🤗

@schragdenker5425

19 күн бұрын

Don't be upset. There are already a lot of people out there buying photoshop(p)ed pictures, cards, posters. There'll always be a lot not knowing, not seeing the difference between fake and real creative art. Don't get frustrated and think of artists like f.e. Paul Cezanne, who was struggling so hard for many years. Or Henri Rousseau, or, or, or... so many great artists who were underrated for a long time. Keep on painting/drawing and have fun with it - that's the deal! 🙂

@QueenOfShovels

19 күн бұрын

@@schragdenker5425 for sure! 😊

@y_s4021

8 күн бұрын

I wonder if in a generation or two we'll be so used to AI that no one will know how to do art by themselves and think art is supposed to cost pennies. On the other hand, maybe people will get surprised and say "wow, you did it yourself? with your hands?" and will want to buy the work just because of it.

@Iamsam526

2 күн бұрын

AI paintings is what will eventually fill target, ikea, Marshall’s, ect. Prints for people that just want pretty house decor.

@wout123100

3 сағат бұрын

@@y_s4021 i think there will be a small market for treu handwork, but that might be pricey, ala big art nowadays

What I find shocking is that on Instagram artists are giving likes and positive comments on AI paintings because they don't realise that it is AI. And that makes me think: are we really capable of seeing the difference between hand made and AI? We want to believe that, but I have my doubts.

@TumpalManurung

9 күн бұрын

Not only on Instagram. It's everywhere. A lot of people can't even differentiate photos of real persons and persons created by AI. I also realized this when reading the comments. This also happens on youtube. It's unsettling.

@akeemmorrison2589

8 күн бұрын

Artists can tell but think about how some people can’t even tell that pranks are scripted…. So yea

@y_s4021

8 күн бұрын

It's not possible to tell the difference. Especially when the original arts are things just made for fun. The only way we can tell the difference now is that AI doesn't understand context or narrative sometimes and can't make fine adjustments yet unless you're really skilled at it.

@akeemmorrison2589

7 күн бұрын

@@y_s4021 as I said possible for me since I'm an artist the fingers and uncanny soulless vibe is a dead giveaway

@Dr.Kraig_Ren

6 күн бұрын

​​@@y_s4021ai can make fine adjustments using inpainting. And it can also generate images based on what your "imagination". Just draw a simple sketch and increase denoising on it slowly

Love your paintings and I really like the water reflections in this one😊

I've been to Japan several times, stayed near Shinjuku, but traveled to the country on weekends... Tokyo itself is surprising in its little magical corners, unexpected green places... And, getting out, into small towns, or an inn in the mountains, reveals how underrated, or misunderstood, Japan is as a beautiful and quiet destination, not so much as a "tourist", maybe, but as someone who can take in both the natural beauty and the historical elements... And, indeed, many, many "paintable" moments and scenes. But the "AI"doesn't put down a wash, or pull up a bit of pigment, or "feel" any frustration or joy in the process or the result. Keep on putting passion to paper!

After watching only about 6 minutes I had to stop and shout a „Yes, exactly, you are SO right!“ I've been playing around on the nightcafe platform a little bit. Yes, it's impressive, and in my opinion AI can be a nice source of inspiration if you don't have a specific picture in your head that you what to paint or draw. But it can never replace the fun of painting or even replace if you want to paint a specific scene. What I noticed too: Most people use it for very similiar images like dragons, mystic women or wizards, demons, or comic-like animals. Which gets boring quite quickly. And now I'll keep on enjoing you video (I just found your channel today). Greetings from Germany/France. On 30:33: This fits perfect! 🙂

Love your painting, and your painting lessons have inspired my journey as a painter, I too was inspired by anime via Hayao Miyazaki’s wonderful films which so captured my heart I had to pick up watercolors for myself and the calming zen like practice brings me joy every time I pick up a brush. Thank you for sharing your painting journey with us all.

Hey man keep going! I’m an artist too, I know the joy feeling when doing art, the philosophy too can not be brought without human heart through their hand. That is, the technology has no soul to bring the philosophy right? I study the cycle of everything, things may lost of interest in decade. But let me say that time will bring back the era of hand painting, the human art. Keep going my man! Greeting from Jakarta, IDN

I long gave up on making money with art in the future, but I will never in my wildest dream give up being an artist, I will create until the moment I can no longer physically make art.

I am so happy to see a new video from you and your painting process, Eric! I feel the same way and do not let AI news affect me too much. Creating art art with art supplies and hands is a very personal, visceral and at times healing experience for many of us ✨Thank you for verbalizing the things related to AI! I hope to see you kore often here!!

Please never give up! Your painting warmed my heart, thank you ❤️

this was a very informative video. I am not an artist, but I’m trying to figure out exactly what AI is going to do life in general and my life in particular. The AI images and videos that look really bizarre and alien are quite fun. But I would never choose imitation of art over real art performed by a passionate artist. And it definitely shows in the work. The human hand is simply not there.

Love your beautiful painting demonstration, thank you for another fantastic video! ❤ I’m with you on AI art, Eric! No matter how good AI artwork may be, the creative process brings me personally so much joy and therapeutic benefits 😊 Plus allows me to connect with loved ones in a meaningful way. So I’ll definitely never stop learning and creating art, especially in an analog, manual way … with real tools like paint, brushes and paper. Love it! 🥰 🎨🖌️

Amazing video and result. So calming to watch. Keep on arting!

Your painting is absolutely beautiful. It touches the heart when I look at it. ❤

AI art is for people who only care for the shallow "pretty" aesthetic of something without understanding that the soul of a work comes from the artists' craft, emotions, and lived experience. They're terrible people-- they want art, but dont care to appreciate/pay artists. I was googling some Anders Zorn watercolors the other day to learn his technique, and the result contained a bunch of AI paintings. It made me so mad.

Excellent demo! Thanks, and keep doing what you are doing!

AI art is missing one of the most fundamental aspects of art, the human connection. Without it, it's soulless. You painting in this video proves it. Listening to and watching your creative process, is the essence of art. Keep painting people, I'm definitely never going to let AI stop me doing what I want to do...unless we get into some Skynet scenario, then I probably won't have a choice...

@supme7558

22 күн бұрын

How do you bottle that ?

@Worldfire_Interactive

15 күн бұрын

That’s exactly right! There’s no point to art if it’s not an artist trying to convey their thoughts, experiences, values or whatever else to another person!

Eric, I love your work. Would you consider talking about your evolution as an artist? You really are amazing and I love your commentary as you go. Thank you for sharing your talent.

You are such a beautiful soul and artist, Eric! No AI can compete with you!❤❤❤❤

Dear Eric, I no longer work in watercolor as my main medium. Certain handicapping factors in this decision. I am working in pastel, in a loose manner. However I cannot resist watching watercolor demos. I discovered Chien Chung-Wei (the red lantern painting) a while ago so when I saw a notice of his video Painting Nature … I had to watch. The voice-over immediately got my attention. That voice was so familiar. You did a wonderful job with it. The entire video was captivating. I purchased it. You may wish to tell Chien he has a big fan: an old woman in West Virginia, USA. Best wishes to both of you.

@Cafewatercolor

23 күн бұрын

I am so glad! it was such a fun project and I learned so much from doing it =) I wish you well. Pastle is great too! any traditional medium are just wonderful to play with

What a great video. It was interesting to see what is possible with AI but I think it only makes real art built on human judgement, skill, creativity and sensitivity more valuable not less. Your painting is real art. And being witness to your creativity process on these videos is priceless. It's so helpful when you explain how you make decisions about how to plan and paint throughout. And then the natural movement/drying of the paint itself makes it more than any machine is worth in my opinion. Please come back to Japan again soon! There are so many great scenes all over the country to inspire you! 😊❤

Absolutely beautiful, thank you so much for your three plus hours it was well worth it, no comparison hands down this is real art makes my heart sing and my eyes feel emotion. AI can not and will never compare

To be fair, in light of the fact that you ARE so talented and mezmerizing, how can I be sure that you yourself are not AI... :) You sometimes are surreal to me with your soothing voice and expert hand, that alone seperates you from the pack! Never stop painting. As a whole, we the people will find a way to preserve human art! As long as there are humans willing to continue shareing their gifts. Thank you for you!

Please stay on KZread. I love your channel!

I do love the sentence written at the end of your video, short but huge in the meaning.

As a watercolor artist I use Midjourney for roughly 12 months now and I have learned to make beautiful reference images and suggestions for your actual painting. I can understand that people are anxious about AI stuff as it competes with what real people are doing and maybe in future it is even doing it better. You don't get an idea of what Midjourney is capable to do in just a few hours, it takes at least some week. Also the functionality changed much over time as all is still pretty much work in progress and it will change in the future. What is true is that you will always only get an approximation of what you have in mind as AI will never produce the same picture twice. Having said this, I still like the process of watercolor painting over creating a picture with Ai and I believe there will alway be a room for handcrafted original art.

Eric, Your art was done with something AI doesn't have....Heart and Soul. When I look at your painting I can feel the human touch and hours that went into it. You are a wonderful artist. If I could paint as good as you, I would be a happy artist. I love to paint though.

I never knew about Al thank you for explaining it , but i love to paint it makes me happy and relaxed. Your work is beautiful.

i REALLY miss you on youtube. You were my favorite!

I love you paintings, your carefull thoughts and skills are very impressive. I always support human artists over AI users who type out renderings using artists images, who don't see a penny for our years of passion and devotion to our crafts.

THANK YOU , that was beautifully said, it was a conscern I had.

Another very important point regarding A.I. artwork is that the image is only in the computer, and unless you have a giclee printer you are not going to get it onto a nice Arches or Reeves, etc., quality paper. Also the ink in a printer that the general public can get their hands on is not going to lay on the paper, be absorbed by the paint like a quality watercolor paint is going to do. Nor will A.I. generated prints replace print-making, as an art, as the ink from a printing press has a very different viscus quality to modern printers. The inks are not the same composition as the traditional press' inks, whether they are oil based or of a newer water-color base. So the way in which the ink sits on the paper is inferior, and this can be seen by the naked eye, if you look at how the inks sit on the paper. This is also the case with lithography stone printing; which has its own idiosyncratic qualities. So take heart, fellow artists! Until they improve those issues we have job security.

If no joy went into creating a piece then no joy can be had from it.

I really appreciate that you made this video to compare AI vs Hand Painted. As an artist myself, it's challenging to compare my art to AI. Thank you so much for this informative video along with your beautiful painting!

取代不了的除了畫作中表達的你內心的美感以外，在繪製的過程還參雜了很多的“獨特”在內，內心的心情、情緒是很影響任何行為、活動的執行過程，這些是沒辦法具體表達起來且每個人都不盡相同，而這些被影響的過程，正隨著過程而摻入畫作當中，無限細小的每一步，才構成了你的畫作，這不是那些機器能代表，哪怕找其他人來剪貼、縫合你的畫作，根據你一些畫風特徵去畫，也沒辦法代表你，因為它們沒有你的心。

I think AI will ultimately backfire and make human creations even more desirable! Keep going! ❤

most importantly you are able to want. that's firs step for inspiration and further improvement

Well said Eric.. art is so much more than a pretty picture. It has soul. Really enjoy your videos. Blessings !

I appreciate your perspective on this. I would also like to add that we humans are often weirdly particular and specific with what we want to make. Because of this, it's simpler (not easier) to just pick up a drawing/painting/whatever utensil and make the thing. I think that's why fiddling with an AI prompt isn't fun for us. We actually enjoy the act of making things 😂

Great Perspective, love the painting!

As an engineer with rather a lot of experience in neural networks, deep learning, and machine intelligence, I can assure you: Telling the computer what you want it to do is every bit as hard as doing it yourself. It's just that instead of learning to move your hand in the right way, you are learning to articulate the precise result you want. One of these is a physical skill, and the other is a verbal skill. However, there is a fairly important issue with the machine: we do not have enough training data to make it very much better at doing what you want. When you are learning to paint, it is fairly easy to become better at (say) painting boats. But machine learning isn't linear, it's exponential. If you want it to get a little bit better, you need a lot more training data. We are very nearly at the point where there simply isn't any more training data. The machine demands more data to improve than the human race is producing, which will bring progress from the machine to a screeching halt. I doesn't matter how fast or how well the machine ingests data - which are the major improvements that have driven the current crop of generative models - if there is simply no more data to ingest. Human beings do not have this limitation. The loudly-repeated lie that the machine is going to get better and better and you cannot stop it will, in time, be seen for the wishful thinking it is. Because the machine is NOT going to get better. We don't have and can't get what it needs to be better.

@roxane1237

11 күн бұрын

The biggest issue is that the data used to be trained has been done so regardless of copyrights. The fact that so many artists have their paintings used against their will in order to be able to plagiarize their style is hardbreaking. I hope the court cases will be successful ... Algorithms that have been trained with ill obtained data have to be destroyed and ethically rebuilt

@cdarklock

11 күн бұрын

@@roxane1237 It's not in the algorithm. It's in a data file, which has in most cases been made freely available for download on the internet, including the Laion5B database that has created the most backlash. You may as well suggest that every pirated movie or TV show in the world needs to be deleted. Scream all you want, it is never going to happen, and you're never going to stop people from hosting the illegal downloads either.

@bhavana6217

11 күн бұрын

Every bit as hard? Lmao

@cdarklock

11 күн бұрын

@@bhavana6217 Spoken like a true novice who has never had to keep anything on-model.

@UNIxo00

11 күн бұрын

@@cdarklockno. You are simply fooling yourself, you aren’t creating jack, your “artistic” integrity and credibility can only be as good as the model that steals actual artist’s shit. You are simply putting on the facade of an artist. If you truly thing it’s just as hard, you’ve probably never drawn anything worth a damn in your life, or highly underestimate what goes into creating art

I use ai to to get compositions and to get things to paint in general with the models I can afford to use either being unreliable or not the best, but like everything else that people thought was going to be replaced in the past like hand made furniture, real paintings will never be replaced, people want the personal crafted high end product, ai will replace those £5 canvases you get in supermarkets and some of the digital art.

Never forget that as a human creating art you are working from your heart to your hand an act of creation which can never be repeated from a key board to screen.♥

Your art is beautiful and inspiring - everything AI is not. So glad to see your video. Thank you. ❤️

Really, like the way it relays piecefulness

Wow, you are so good!

Yep, it’s the process that keeps me trying, not just the end result. People who don’t like or understand the reward of the process of making art will never understand this difference. Plus I have to agree about what many have already said in that when you buy actual art by an artist, you’re also buying into that artist and who they are, not just a neat-o image. Prompting is more like being an art director or a fussy client lording over a commission than an artist. Yes it takes an eye for things and some creativity to prompt, but it’s not the same as being the artist. AI is the production artist here. Anyone who has worked on the commercial side of art gets what I’m talking about. 😉

Awesome video, awesome painting

Please come back to you tube! I love your tutorials!

I don't think AI will replace artists at all. AI allows humans to collaborate with machines more and more efficiently. But yes AI generates via inference (meaning best guess). It struggled with consistency from one image to another (due to its inference nature) and this is a very basic thing. The level of interaction between human and machine is also still rudimentary as you mentioned. There is a workstream of AI rendering dedicated to realtime user input eg. Krita or realtime canvas. This will evolve into something where the user can draw on a digital canvas for the larger objects (available now) then zero in on details for small sections within the image to have AI render finer details. For instance I needed a tie in my photo instead of a bowtie so I was able to draw a straight yellow line and since the prompt includes a tie, AI transformed that straight line into a regular necktie. This saved me a trip to get a headshot (which I would have edited afterwards anyway). Most of the effort thus far in AI has not been to assist artists yet, it has been to allow layers of inference on top of inference. After it gets through its basic stages there will be more tools specifically to aid artists.

Keep your hand painting going for sure.✨🌈🙏

I just heard the first couple of seconds of your video.And my opinion is homemade hands down all the way

Thanks Eric

Beautiful and human painting, interpretation and recreation of a wonderful memory. AI can’t do that.❤️

people care more about the artist and their story than the art anyways. this is the first time in history the public can get to know/support the artist directly. ai will eventually be better than everyone at everything so we're all in the same rickety tourist boat fortunately.

A1 art = cubic zirconiums. Watercolour art = diamonds

The problem most people don't see: "I enjoy human art more than AI generated stuff" - only works as long as you can tell the difference. And we are already at a point where you sometimes cannot see it anymore. Thats what drives me nearly into depression. What value has my art anymore, if every idiot can generate basically the same in seconds with zero effort? (and I don't talk about money) The internet gets flooded with millions of AI images every day, so even now its already hard for human art to not completely drown in it.

@PeteQuad

4 күн бұрын

It may get harder to trade your art for money, similar to how it was before the Internet. However, it will never diminish the feeling of satisfaction you get from being able to look at something and say, "I created that.".

Yours is much better.❤

Art is exclusively an expression of humanity, when I look at any painting from the past I know that every brush stroke and every decision was made by a living breathing human with experiences, thoughts and emotions. For many artists their art is perhaps the only living evidence that they existed and that a part of their soul lived on. Just the act of making art is in itself not possible without a human being with something to say about their experience on earth.

When l saw your painting l could feel your memory of that place,time of day, weather. I could feel the emotions. AI does not provide that and never will as it has no soul. It has no feelings, that is the difference I can never feel anything when looking at AI product

“You can feed it with images and ask it to mimic the style you gave.” ie. stealing actual real art from living artists, violating their copyright, and making money off it with no compensation; and all you’re doing is typing in some prompts. A.I. is IMMORAL, UNLAWFUL, SHADY, DIRTY and WRONG.

Don't give up, in my opinion real is always more impressive than fake!

@samstewart9249

23 күн бұрын

Besides AI adds too much detail, leaves nothing to the viewers imagination. The real painting does. That's not art, just electronic cloning.

Art is about the making. What is significant is what happens to a person when they create. It doesn't matter if a computer can paint "better" than you, there's a person who can paint better than you also. That never stopped anybody before. Art isn't about the thing that is made. It is about the effect of making on the maker. The pieces are like footprints that only record the progress of the walker. The walk from point a to point b is the actual work. It doesn't matter if a computer can also make "footprints".

Have u been in Green city and what do you think about it.

I think this AI generation will bring about a renaissance of human art and a renewed appreciation for it. And I also think we will become very good at telling the difference between human and AI artworks. Also, I think people will turn away from computers and the internet en masse in the coming decades.

It also depends on the prompts

What is valuable in a paint is the feeling behind the scene. In a way, liking a painting is expressing empathy with the author. I don't think a program can transmit feelings, because it is too perfect. No human bias. Buying AI generated art is like buying prints in a low cost store. It mught be nice but does not induce any feelings

Ai can provide inspiration for an idea, a launchpad of sorts, but however good the image, it's still an empty vessel. I can see a time when art, music and literature will require a declaration from the artist that no machine intervention was used in the creation process. To claim that I would never buy computer generated art would be a non-starter for me. I did in fact buy a computer drawn sketch for £5 from Harold Cohen at a museum exhibition in Cardiff, Wales in 1984, then it was a curiosity and a far cry from the quality we are seeing today. I still have it.

Art, any form of art, is the expression of the human soul. Dancing is an expression of the soul. Singing, playing music, is an expression of the soul. Painting, drawing , inking is an expression- they all convey human emotion in a surreal way, you can communicate a hundred emotions with any form of art, and AI lacks that. It has no hard work poured into it, it has no soul, people live on through art , the dancer relives it every dance done by someone else and the painter lives through what he he puts into a canvas. AI is just soulless numbers computing into some algorithm. It may look technically pleasing, but It’ll never have the blood sweat and tears a human leaves behind in their work through years of passion for their art.

When doing Dialog for your videos , back off from the mic so you don't have such a boomy , bass component to your voice. it's called proximity effect. the closer you get the more bass your voice will have. try a stay a foot or more away from the mic. you might have to increase the recording level a small bit. good job!

Does ai keep your pictures in the memory and offer it to other people?

@bonniecullom1007

24 күн бұрын

That is something I would like to know myself, makes you really not trust AI, though…..

@supme7558

22 күн бұрын

Of course it trains the algorithm

Can AI put paint on paper or canvas? Or can it only be viewed on a screen or printed?

I think AI art will be used extensively for commercial purposes, where 'vibe' is the focus rather than nailing down a very specific detail. So for commercial artists, AI art is really going to largely replace/displace/shrink the industry significantly. Where art is created for the personal experience, or the personal story, where the art is connected to the artist who specifically makes it, then AI won't be able to replace that kind of art, because it comes from a personal desire to create.

It will get more precise in time.

How about letting AI paint something unique that you can then use as an inspiration for a unique paint? Not unlike targetting a photograph. The former possibly violating a photographer's copyright. I think it's an inversion of the process and another source of inspiration.

Not sure transferring ai "painting" to watercolor paper will look nearly as natural as hand painted. Hand painted co.ors will blend and flow and mix very subtly while the ink printer won't be able to capture that very well, plus will be lacking brushwork marks it seems?I've done work in co Peter of paintings, znd they look good in the computer, but on paper they don't look good or natural beczuse of reasons I mentioned.

Not going to lie, the emergence of AI art has made me hesitant about learning how to draw. However now that I have started learning again and stopped being so focused on the outcome, I find the process itself very rewarding / relaxing. There is value in human made art beyond the outcome.

I enjoy observing a painting for the artist's visible struggle solving a particular visual problem, and their solution to that problem. That is simply not present in AI slurm.

In my experience trying to use AI as someone with no technical knowledge, it's so hard to get what I wanted that it took me hours and I couldn't do it. I tried doing the "my girlfriend and I as pixar characters" thing, and there was just no way of getting it right. It's still not intuitive or accessible for common people.

AI paintings don't have any value, because, they are the same as searching for something on the internet and downloading it, but, you can search for something as a paragraph (prompt). I really like the one you painted with your hand. ❤

By the way, I love your boat painting

There are artists and there are non artists. A non artist is someone who never learned the basics of art. Which is composition, perspective, proportion. The use of the medium and the tools to work on it. An artist must have something clear in mind to start a painting, yes. If he is not clear towards what he aims at, what he'll end up with, is coincidence of using medium and material. It can happen that an already skilled artist gets a truly impressive result by being un-aimed. It can happen that a non artist gets an impressive result when he puts his heart and soul into a painting. It might be out of proportion and out of perspective but at least it would appear as well composed through coincidence. The chances that this might happen, are very low though. I would think that artists, compared to non artists would always have better results. Since they train themselves to use the brush in a confident way and make safe strokes instead of unsafe ones. Non artists fiddle around, artists un-learned to fiddle. So, it's non artists who like to produce AI-generated works, calling it "art". The results appear as artful and impressive, but what is the point in telling a machine the specifics since - how you rightly pointed out - no matter how specific you get, the AI won't generate what you have in mind because it's not a mind reader. So, logically, as someone who wants to produce a piece of art through AI, I have nothing really specific in my mind but un-specific, and I let myself being impressed by the result, since I wasn't expecting its outcome. I enjoy the randomness as a surprise, for example. What I then am, is not an artist but a typer of text commands. The less commands I give the machine, the more I leave it to coincidence. The more commands I type in, the more specific I become. If I type something, the machine generates something, I'm not satisfied and type more, the machine generates something, I might come to the conclusion that I've learnt to become more text-specific. That's not a bad thing if you train yourself towards achieving a precise messaging. But that doesn't make me an artist and it doesn't turn the AI result into art. What it does do is make me realise how to communicate with a computer program so that instructions are understood. It's quite helpful when you notice that you can also talk to people better if you use definitions correctly. On the other hand, it gives me a sense of power because the AI obeys my commands. Ultimately, art loses its meaning when it can be created in abundance and in just a few minutes. The sheer mass of results of computer-generated images and texts runs away from all contemplation if contemplation is limited to a second's viewing and then the next click makes you forget the whole thing. In order to find out whether a work was created by a person or a machine, it is now only accepted that the process itself is documented on film. This means that people record themselves creating their work. But even this can soon be simulated, so that no one can ever be sure whether they are seeing a human or a machine. The only way to find out is to leave the internet and enter the physical world.

Never give up! I would not even pay a penny for AI. AI which stands for artificial intelligence says it all! Keep on panting! I love your style of painting as a genuine and bonafide human being! 👏👏👏👏👏

The process of creating is what matters. The result, not so much unless you're painting on demand.

Picasso was worried about photography making portrait artists redundant... it's the reason he started cubism

The actual painting looks so much better and visually appealing than the ai generated images