AC/DC - Back in Black REVEAL - Vintage vs Modern: Which is Better?
Музыка
AC/DC - Back in Black Vintage Vinyl vs Modern: Which is Better? - PART 2
THE REVEAL
Three copies from around the world were compared: an Aussie original, and two modern remasters.
But which was which?
00:00 - Intro
00:26 - REVEALED: Which albums were which?
01:05 - Analysis
Any surprises in there for you?
Which one was your preferred copy?
Let me know in the comments below, I’d love to hear what you thought.
_____________________________________________________________________
Thanks for listening and see you again soon for many more vinyl comparisons coming up, including Mac Miller, Kanye and Kendrick, Queen and Marley...
Have a look at these other videos in the meantime:
++ AC/DC - Back In Black - PART 1
• AC/DC - Back in Black ...
++ PINK FLOYD 'The Wall' SHOCK LISTENING SESSION
• THIS LISTENING SESSION...
++ THE ROLLING STONES 'Sticky Fingers' Vinyl Comparison
• Vintage VS Modern - TH...
++ THE WHO 'Who's Next' Vinyl Comparison
• Vintage VS Modern - TH...
All rights belong to the respective artists.
These song clips are claimed Fair Use for comparison and study, are non-profit and are for educational purposes only. Short clips of these records are being used so the audience can hear a musical selections’ similarities and differences only, for discussion and learning.
++++ The recordings from vinyl you are listening to were done like so:
Turntable: Yamaha GT-2000 (Giant And Tremendous!)
Cartridge: Benz Micro GOLD (MC) w/retipped nude micro-ridge stylus and boron cantilever
Phono Stage: Heed Questar Phono (MC stage)
ADC: Schiit JIL
Cables: all custom
No EQ on the pre-amplifier in-between - these are straight rips from the MC stage---ADC---laptop (Audacity).
Conversion : FLACs processed in foobar2000 for ReplayGain/audio volume matching *only*.
Volume matching for YT: video pre-processed with Auphonic so all video audio levels matched again (Loudness Normalization to -14LUFS), before upload to KZread.
#ACDC #BackInBlack #reveal
Пікірлер: 26
I'm 57 and #3 sounded the best imo. I still have my original pressing that I bought back in '80! Still sounds good too!
@joncandyfliprecords
2 ай бұрын
Nice one.
Hi John, I picked #3 last week because of the clean sound and the clarity in the high end. I totally understand your comment that listening to a cut like this can become jarring very quickly....the digital causes it I think as opposed to analogue. I would love to listen to the Aussie OG ...but on a turntable..not via headphones on my mobile. I'm sure the results would be different hearing from a good system, good speakers and in the right room. Regardless...this was fun to listen and compare. I also liked how you kept us in suspense for a week before the reveal. Bravo ! Please keep your content coming.. it's fantastic !! All the best, Steve 🙏
@joncandyfliprecords
Жыл бұрын
Love you right back Steve - you are the (small) audience I keep doing these for. Thanks so much.
I picked #2 because I found the sound more warm, pleasing to my ears. The second choice, #1, is a serious contender considering it was released in 2003. The third one, #3, sounded thin and too much treble imo (but nowhere near as the Japanese pressing of Nirvana's Nevermind). But I would point that due to a lousy mastering, whether it's digital sourced or not
We have a US 1980 pressing Atlantic - SD 16018, lacquer cut at Masterdisk by Robert Ludwig and it is mind-blowing. To my ears it sounds even better than these 3 pressings you've kindly demonstrated for us. We did have the title track on our KZread channel but it had to be removed unfortunatly :(
@joncandyfliprecords
Жыл бұрын
I’ve got this one too (my original plan was to compare the 8 different copies I had, but I shortened this one for simplicity sakes). It’s good, but like most US masterings of original AUS content, it’s very different. Different in some good ways, and some bad. Personally I still prefer the OG Aussie sound from the 80’s, but that’s just me. Thanks for watching and the comments! ✌🏽
@stuarttacey
Жыл бұрын
@@joncandyfliprecords The US was cut by RL from the master tape. The Aussie Albert is from a copy tape. You can hear the extra clarity on the RL. I also like the punch of the Albert but it has that slight veil compared to the US RL.
Thanks, John, for providing this comparison opportunity. On headphones I preferred the 2003 remaster. It just seemed more laid back and fun in its sound. The other two did not appeal to me nearly as much.
@joncandyfliprecords
Жыл бұрын
Thanks Garry - appreciate your comments. 🙏
Surprising! I have number 1......and still glad. It sounds good to me.
@joncandyfliprecords
Жыл бұрын
Nice one Steve - whatever works my friend. 👍
Mine is a 1980 atlantic, and honestly know nothing about the different versions or remastered copies. I thought mine was an old copy because Im old and bought it when it came out. I never knew there were so many remastered copys out there.
@joncandyfliprecords
Күн бұрын
Looks like your vinyl is a timeless classic, just like you!
I guess one sounded louder to me
Is it me or the original 1st pressing has the correct speed? I have the 2003 remaster which sound like it drags. I sped up the record with my pitch shift and it sounded similar to the original, but not as bright. I just compared my 1st pressing to my 2003 remaster and thats something I just picked up on.
@joncandyfliprecords
Жыл бұрын
I hadn't picked that up but it could well be so. Is that the common belief on these remasters - that the 2003 got the speed wrong? It could be a pressing error I suppose (spindle hole making the rotations in an elipse rather than a perfect circle)
I saw this earlier today and picked number 2. I'm 69.
@joncandyfliprecords
2 ай бұрын
Nice choice.
The original Australian release sounds great. I got the Robert Ludwig pressing and it trumps the original Australian in every way
@joncandyfliprecords
11 ай бұрын
Depends on the sound you prefer, but of course, Aussie ears grew up with the OZ mastering, so disagree. :)
@darthwarren4599
11 ай бұрын
@@joncandyfliprecords that’s true and we will always like what we like. I like some of the us pressings of Beatles albums better than uk
Nine touches the original
@joncandyfliprecords
3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment
the second record sounds phatter and more compressed. the third record sounds to open, to much highs the snare is to crisp. First record has a lack of power
@joncandyfliprecords
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the thoughts!