AC/DC - Back in Black REVEAL - Vintage vs Modern: Which is Better?

Музыка

AC/DC - Back in Black Vintage Vinyl vs Modern: Which is Better? - PART 2
THE REVEAL
Three copies from around the world were compared: an Aussie original, and two modern remasters.
But which was which?
00:00​ - Intro
00:26 - REVEALED: Which albums were which?
01:05 - Analysis
Any surprises in there for you?
Which one was your preferred copy?
Let me know in the comments below, I’d love to hear what you thought.
_____________________________________________________________________
Thanks for listening and see you again soon for many more vinyl comparisons coming up, including Mac Miller, Kanye and Kendrick, Queen and Marley...
Have a look at these other videos in the meantime:
++ AC/DC - Back In Black - PART 1
• AC/DC - Back in Black ...
++ PINK FLOYD 'The Wall' SHOCK LISTENING SESSION
• THIS LISTENING SESSION...
++ THE ROLLING STONES 'Sticky Fingers' Vinyl Comparison
• Vintage VS Modern - TH...
++ THE WHO 'Who's Next' Vinyl Comparison
• Vintage VS Modern - TH...
All rights belong to the respective artists.
These song clips are claimed Fair Use for comparison and study, are non-profit and are for educational purposes only. Short clips of these records are being used so the audience can hear a musical selections’ similarities and differences only, for discussion and learning.
++++ The recordings from vinyl you are listening to were done like so:
Turntable: Yamaha GT-2000 (Giant And Tremendous!)
Cartridge: Benz Micro GOLD (MC) w/retipped nude micro-ridge stylus and boron cantilever
Phono Stage: Heed Questar Phono (MC stage)
ADC: Schiit JIL
Cables: all custom
No EQ on the pre-amplifier in-between - these are straight rips from the MC stage---ADC---laptop (Audacity).
Conversion : FLACs processed in foobar2000 for ReplayGain/audio volume matching *only*.
Volume matching for YT: video pre-processed with Auphonic so all video audio levels matched again (Loudness Normalization to -14LUFS), before upload to KZread.
#ACDC #BackInBlack #reveal

Пікірлер: 26

  • @Wolfie66
    @Wolfie662 ай бұрын

    I'm 57 and #3 sounded the best imo. I still have my original pressing that I bought back in '80! Still sounds good too!

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    2 ай бұрын

    Nice one.

  • @stevedundee866
    @stevedundee866 Жыл бұрын

    Hi John, I picked #3 last week because of the clean sound and the clarity in the high end. I totally understand your comment that listening to a cut like this can become jarring very quickly....the digital causes it I think as opposed to analogue. I would love to listen to the Aussie OG ...but on a turntable..not via headphones on my mobile. I'm sure the results would be different hearing from a good system, good speakers and in the right room. Regardless...this was fun to listen and compare. I also liked how you kept us in suspense for a week before the reveal. Bravo ! Please keep your content coming.. it's fantastic !! All the best, Steve 🙏

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    Жыл бұрын

    Love you right back Steve - you are the (small) audience I keep doing these for. Thanks so much.

  • @raghost15
    @raghost15 Жыл бұрын

    I picked #2 because I found the sound more warm, pleasing to my ears. The second choice, #1, is a serious contender considering it was released in 2003. The third one, #3, sounded thin and too much treble imo (but nowhere near as the Japanese pressing of Nirvana's Nevermind). But I would point that due to a lousy mastering, whether it's digital sourced or not

  • @AnMVinyl
    @AnMVinyl Жыл бұрын

    We have a US 1980 pressing Atlantic - SD 16018, lacquer cut at Masterdisk by Robert Ludwig and it is mind-blowing. To my ears it sounds even better than these 3 pressings you've kindly demonstrated for us. We did have the title track on our KZread channel but it had to be removed unfortunatly :(

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    Жыл бұрын

    I’ve got this one too (my original plan was to compare the 8 different copies I had, but I shortened this one for simplicity sakes). It’s good, but like most US masterings of original AUS content, it’s very different. Different in some good ways, and some bad. Personally I still prefer the OG Aussie sound from the 80’s, but that’s just me. Thanks for watching and the comments! ✌🏽

  • @stuarttacey

    @stuarttacey

    Жыл бұрын

    @@joncandyfliprecords The US was cut by RL from the master tape. The Aussie Albert is from a copy tape. You can hear the extra clarity on the RL. I also like the punch of the Albert but it has that slight veil compared to the US RL.

  • @garryking7508
    @garryking7508 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks, John, for providing this comparison opportunity. On headphones I preferred the 2003 remaster. It just seemed more laid back and fun in its sound. The other two did not appeal to me nearly as much.

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    Жыл бұрын

    Thanks Garry - appreciate your comments. 🙏

  • @stevemurrell6167
    @stevemurrell6167 Жыл бұрын

    Surprising! I have number 1......and still glad. It sounds good to me.

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    Жыл бұрын

    Nice one Steve - whatever works my friend. 👍

  • @tobyroad
    @tobyroad6 күн бұрын

    Mine is a 1980 atlantic, and honestly know nothing about the different versions or remastered copies. I thought mine was an old copy because Im old and bought it when it came out. I never knew there were so many remastered copys out there.

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    Күн бұрын

    Looks like your vinyl is a timeless classic, just like you!

  • @eijiroinouye4115
    @eijiroinouye4115Ай бұрын

    I guess one sounded louder to me

  • @bluepapillon7059
    @bluepapillon7059 Жыл бұрын

    Is it me or the original 1st pressing has the correct speed? I have the 2003 remaster which sound like it drags. I sped up the record with my pitch shift and it sounded similar to the original, but not as bright. I just compared my 1st pressing to my 2003 remaster and thats something I just picked up on.

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    Жыл бұрын

    I hadn't picked that up but it could well be so. Is that the common belief on these remasters - that the 2003 got the speed wrong? It could be a pressing error I suppose (spindle hole making the rotations in an elipse rather than a perfect circle)

  • @carmenandthedevil2804
    @carmenandthedevil28042 ай бұрын

    I saw this earlier today and picked number 2. I'm 69.

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    2 ай бұрын

    Nice choice.

  • @darthwarren4599
    @darthwarren459911 ай бұрын

    The original Australian release sounds great. I got the Robert Ludwig pressing and it trumps the original Australian in every way

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    11 ай бұрын

    Depends on the sound you prefer, but of course, Aussie ears grew up with the OZ mastering, so disagree. :)

  • @darthwarren4599

    @darthwarren4599

    11 ай бұрын

    @@joncandyfliprecords that’s true and we will always like what we like. I like some of the us pressings of Beatles albums better than uk

  • @thomasshorter1251
    @thomasshorter12513 ай бұрын

    Nine touches the original

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    3 ай бұрын

    Thanks for the comment

  • @user-kn7jg8xg5v
    @user-kn7jg8xg5v11 ай бұрын

    the second record sounds phatter and more compressed. the third record sounds to open, to much highs the snare is to crisp. First record has a lack of power

  • @joncandyfliprecords

    @joncandyfliprecords

    11 ай бұрын

    Thanks for the thoughts!

Келесі