No video

Abstract Ideas: 100 Years of De Stijl

Пікірлер: 28

  • @esonandabankulu2894
    @esonandabankulu28942 жыл бұрын

    One thing I understand is the philosophy of simplicity here...it's more about the raw and concrete expression of what minimalist is and not about a flashy approach compared to old movements like baroque and all...it's real class

  • @lexilala1968
    @lexilala19683 жыл бұрын

    I cannot believe that an actual real person decided that "most intellectually satisfying _chair"_ was a viable sentence

  • @russelldudley2305

    @russelldudley2305

    3 жыл бұрын

    I am building one. It is just that.

  • @andrewvalenski921

    @andrewvalenski921

    23 күн бұрын

    I think that may actually be saying more about you than the subject you’re referencing. Something to sit with

  • @benjaminarmstrong7047
    @benjaminarmstrong70473 жыл бұрын

    Ferris Beuller's De off.

  • @jugglingjob
    @jugglingjob6 жыл бұрын

    'De Stijl' in Dutch is pronounced almost the same as The Style in English. So it's not The Sschhhtyle ;)

  • @Benimation

    @Benimation

    6 жыл бұрын

    I know, this was so cringy to listen too.. Other than that, it's a great video, though.

  • @pope400

    @pope400

    6 жыл бұрын

    But how will my friends know I'm artsy if I don't accent the shit out of everything?

  • @LQOTW

    @LQOTW

    6 жыл бұрын

    Yes, please lose the German pronunciation when speaking Dutch. You wouldn't speak Spanish with a French accent, would you? Even the French don't do that.

  • @birddogfreemann

    @birddogfreemann

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yeah. Why is IT that we have a bloody American telling us about De Stijl?! What a complete loser.

  • @studioROT

    @studioROT

    3 жыл бұрын

    It is not only cringing, it says something about the approach towards research. Uninformed attempts to pronunciation betray academic laziness. It is ironic that this man mentions the concept of ’essential elements of representation’ in the same sentence in which he fails to apply the essential elements of representation, once again.

  • @bigcirkus306
    @bigcirkus3063 жыл бұрын

    "By, sort of weeping (or wheeping?) to the end of a line and dispensing of everything that is not essentials you find this ultimate form of representation that is ultimate abstraction" What weeping? Which one of the lines? Is it all lines? What are essentials and for what? What representation, what is being represented here? How an abstraction can be half or ultimate?

  • @umangkayastha7422

    @umangkayastha7422

    3 жыл бұрын

    Weeping as in erasing elements that are not essential so as to define a piece that is not too heterogeneous. Here, the essential elements are the primary colours red, blue and yellow only, and horizontal and vertical lines intersecting at right angles. A style of simplicity that defines modern movement is being represented here. De stijl was just an idea in art and design, a complete abstraction that was brought to materialistic form through architecture and design.

  • @bigcirkus306

    @bigcirkus306

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@umangkayastha7422 When you look at a real inspirational art no words, persuasions or interpretations are necessary. Check out Ivan Shishkin.

  • @ScottJamesHicks
    @ScottJamesHicks5 жыл бұрын

    The narrator looks like a De Stijl version of Mathew Broderick. (Not an insult. Just an observation.)

  • @patryktomaszewski578
    @patryktomaszewski5783 жыл бұрын

    Cubism was not abstract and Picasso was adamant about never jettisoning representation. Futurism, while embracing non-figurative vocabularies, was not founded as an abstract art movement (and was more political in nature). These distinctions are very important when teaching the history of abstraction. Sotheby's needs to do better job at vetting the content.

  • @remsan03
    @remsan032 жыл бұрын

    Very handsome fella, that Julian Dawes.

  • @elektrozil9728
    @elektrozil97283 жыл бұрын

    The bottom of the chair actually said: R_OT_A_T_E.

  • @temmiesjourney6003
    @temmiesjourney60033 жыл бұрын

    Not a fan of the De Stijl design, but it has an interesting concept.

  • @armanflint

    @armanflint

    3 жыл бұрын

    It's not a design. It's a movement.

  • @nikkiwebsterrulz
    @nikkiwebsterrulz6 жыл бұрын

    he's hot

  • @jaguarandi2
    @jaguarandi25 жыл бұрын

    it's kind of lame

  • @Doors067

    @Doors067

    4 жыл бұрын

    I like it but not in a pretencious way, i once had a woman ask me what i liked about it and my response was its simple to enjoy but beyond my comprehension.plus there are certain ones i like and some i dont (-:

  • @lexilala1968

    @lexilala1968

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Doors067 While that statement may not be pretentious in itself, it's in the spirit of other people's pretentiousness

  • @hansolo2121

    @hansolo2121

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@lexilala1968 That's like saying that a comment isn't racist in itself, but it's in the spirit of other people's racism. And that is exactly what is happening now all over the world. Everything is racist. If you want it to be.

  • @lexilala1968

    @lexilala1968

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@hansolo2121 I was kinda joking you really didn't need to make it political :/

Келесі