I've flown both. Slight advantage to the A350 because the width of seats are slightly bigger. I've been able to sleep well on both. I like the gimmick of the window dimmer on the 787. I think the A350 is slightly quieter. I noticed it on takeoff especially. But really both are great to fly in.

@_w_w_

4 жыл бұрын

Good explanation! But you forgot one thing: A350 also have slightly higher humidity than even the B787, so you arrive even more rested. I've measured inflight noises and A350 is quieter than B787 as well.

@ndlben7129

4 жыл бұрын

@@_w_w_ Whatever. And how can you support your evidence that one has more humidity than the other? Already in the video he pretends to say that the over head bin are bigger. It’s the first time I’ve heard that..🙄 For noise, you have to compare while sitting in the same place. Anyway the 787 has outsells the A350 since years and is the market favorite ...

@_w_w_

4 жыл бұрын

@@ndlben7129 You don't follow the industry or don't fly a lot. A350 has higher humidity...by ~5% due to A350 fuselage is designed to withstand higher pressure than B787. It's published data silly! As far as noise is concerned, I also measured the cabin noise at 14 different phases of the flight, sitting at nearly identical location. You are not the only one can think of these things...

@tanmayupasani7581

4 жыл бұрын

@@ndlben7129 Given that 787 sales started like 2-3 years prior to that of A350, of course it has outsold the A350.

@ndlben7129

4 жыл бұрын

@Tanmay Upasani Absolutely nothing to do with it because most of the time (until the COVID-19 crisis) the 787 won orders against the A350. In other words the A350 has stagnated for years and it has absolutely nothing to do especially since the A350 has inherited orders from the A350 MK1 since 2005. It's just that the 787 is well suited for the market whose size (787) is criticized as being smaller in terms of cabin compared to the A350. But in life you cannot have everything. The 787 Dreamliner is a long haul size never made before while the A350 just takes the triple 7 market (777)

Scott, Thanks for the huge shoutout! One Japanese viewer left a comment saying that as soon as he or she saw the intro featuring the flight info embedded in your ticket format, this viewer knew that was you Scott. This tells us that airline reviews are watched by people around the world. It was so much fun creating this video because 1) I am a huge fan of your channel and you are one of the aviation KZreadrs that inspired me to start my own channel and 2) this was my first collaboration video with a non-Japanese speaker. I’m glad it was you! When you come to Japan next time to try ANA (or other airlines), people may recognize you at airports 😁

@yoshinobutsuda9774

4 жыл бұрын

Congratulations!!! Kaz-san's channel was introduced by Scott-san's this video. Kazu-san introduced this channel, so I watch Scott-san's often. However, I have a language barrier. But I also enjoy Scott-san's channel very much. Stay healthy & take care.

@neoflyerx

4 жыл бұрын

I subscribed to your channel! You have great videos, serves as inspiration for my own.

@attilaaszalos9714

4 жыл бұрын

This video has some nice vews at the introductions to the video

They're both terrific aircraft. My favorite is the A350 though.

@SOCALAVIATION2K

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah let’s go!

@a.gproductions_official

3 жыл бұрын

That Is True Both Are Great Aircraft Although My Favorite Is The A350 But I Still Like The 787

I have never flown on an A350 so I can't tell my preference. The 787 has such a beautiful wing though... Probably my favorite thing in this aircraft

@_w_w_

4 жыл бұрын

The knife cuts both ways. The wings do look cool but if you are inside of the cabin, the flexing of the wing basically block the view for many many seats in the B787.

@ndlben7129

4 жыл бұрын

@@_w_w_ Whatever...

@Cars-N-Jets

4 жыл бұрын

Antonin 2020 the A-350 also has a beautiful wing to tho.

@_w_w_

4 жыл бұрын

@@ndlben7129 Whatever?! I practically live in the air. Due to 787's wind design, there is a much wider/longer attach points to the fuselage and therefore, a lot of seats are "over-wing" seats. In flight, the wing does flex and curve up, and blocks view when you look out. You clearly don't fly enough to even notice something this basic/common.

@bananaboiboi5357

3 жыл бұрын

YAS I had not flown on a A350 but the 787 wing is (～￣▽￣)～

The A350 every day of the week. But my favorite is A380.

I love the variety of your channel and, of course, your sense of humour!

But I love that crick left in my neck after leaning forward, down, sideways, and a bit inverted while looking out of the window of a CRJ-200 for 30+ minutes!

This is the content I've been waiting for from you!

A new Sanspotter video, today just got so much better XD

I flew the 787 before over the Atlantic. Never flown the A350. Love the lighting of the 787 though

i have flown A350, B787, and A330 Neo, all in economy class. Between A350 and B787, i choose A350 as the seat is wider. Among A350, A330 Neo and B787, i will choose A330 Neo by miles.....2-4-2 economy class seating ararngement in A330 Neo makes so much diffrent....the best for my comfort for long haul flight in economy

Great video, Scott! Thank you!

Good comparison Scott. As mentioned it does come down to the individual airline interiors to a certain extent but have flown both on numerous occasions and with same airline and definitely prefer A350.

Great video man! You should do a A320neo vs B737 max debate haha

@df3555

4 жыл бұрын

Easy... One flies, ... One doesn't. 🙊🤣

Scott, Thanks for this comparison video! It was awesome seeing my 2 favorite airplanes! I've flown both but if i have a choice it's the A350, for cabin pressure, windows no comparison! and noise level. Your %100 right though if there's a choice between a particular airline (let's say) Thai airways with an A350 vrs. ANA 787 it's ANA every time. Why? Well because it's the service , food, drinks, and overall way an airline can make you feel that would make me chose them over just my favorite plane type. The 787's are really great airplanes too but for me well just see above. lol. Oh and the video clip of singapore airlines just made me feel sad because I haven't flown them yet ;( Keep up the great work!!!

Like them both! Haven’t flown on in the A350 yet..

@jr13227

4 жыл бұрын

It’s so awesome flew on it with Lufthansa last year

@sanpedrosilver

4 жыл бұрын

jr132 Sweet! I’m looking forward to it

@Cars-N-Jets

4 жыл бұрын

socalsilver you’ll love it.

@Cars-N-Jets

4 жыл бұрын

jr132 Same

Haha Scott love those faces your making in the bathroom mirrors 😂

I will go for 350 anytime. I love the sleek look and interior of the cabin

Scott, once again you never disappoint me.. you made me happy seeing your content again.. I must say the Boeing 787.. I’ve mostly been on Boeing aircrafts..

Uploaded: Ten minutes ago Views: 6 Likes: 7 Comments: 5 Visible Comments: One. Oh KZread.

2:51 that transition was beautiful!

Most people agree the a350 has the better cabin A350 has the better cabin= ppl love a350 787 is a little more efficient=airlines love 787

A350 because those winglets are sooooo cool lol. It’s close though, the 787 is awesome too.

@frontier_001

3 жыл бұрын

Do you mean sharklets? Only Boeing has winglets

@slendii366

2 жыл бұрын

Sharklets lol

Sweet video man!

The “jungle jet” is the emb145 nicknamed that because of where embraer calls home. I know because I used to fly it and that’s what the crj200 guys had to hurl at us.

I’ve flown on both and I have to say I prefer the A350. It’s a very comfortable and quiet aircraft, in fact it’s only one I’ve actually gotten sleep on; plus I love the little things like the exterior cameras on the IFE.

Either for me. Just can’t wait to fly any of them again. Anyway thanks for the latest vid. Keep them coming

With the 787 being plagued with production issues, the A350 is far superior.

Love it when you pay extra for a window seat in the 787 and the cabin crew keeps them dimmed till landing.

@CodPix

2 жыл бұрын

Well, it’s not the fault of boeing

The 787 is only popular because of how new it is and all of the hype the media gives it. But, once it gets to 15+ years it won't be new, hot, and modern and instead, the only thing that people will recognize it for will be its narrow seats, low ceiling, and annoying old generation windows. The A350 is a really nice aircraft and it will definitely still be a pleasant plane to fly on after the 10-year mark (just like the A380) because of its wider cabin and taller ceiling mainly.

@edsmith3070

4 жыл бұрын

I definitely agree

@matthewbrew777

4 жыл бұрын

But the 787 is already over 10 years old and has really high ceilings? I do agree with the narrow seats though (although Japan Airlines uses a much more comfortable 2-4-2 configuration). If the windows weren't locked by the crew of the 787, I'd probably prefer them given their huge size, but overall if I had the choice to fly either then I would choose the A350.

@jimmytorwich3873

4 жыл бұрын

A350 wins by a mile in my opinion and I travel on both of them frequently.

@_w_w_

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed! Having been on a lot of B787, they DO NOT age well. The new generation of lightweight material used by Boeing just don't age well. Both United and ANA 787 of less than 5 yo have a lot of broken things and looked worse than a 757/767.

@Gnaw85

4 жыл бұрын

I agree. Having flown on 787 I can only discribe it as the "nightmareliner" because of the discomfort from the narrow seats. I can't even imagine what it would be like to be unfortunate enough to fly on one of those 777s that has been re-configured to 3-4-3 seating. Boeing has truly lost it in recent years.

been on both a few times. both are amazing

its gotta be one of those videos i never skip a second and im actually serious

A350 hands down in economy due to seat width (exception - JAL's 2-4-2 787). The 787's Window's are a gimmick, I think the dimming is worse than a shade in direct sunlight. In business or first I'd imagine it depends much more on carrier.

Hi SanSpotter, I flew on a 787 last year flying from London Gatwick to Punta Cana with TUI, and I thought it was a pretty good experience. I haven’t flown the A350 yet, but I heard it’s pretty good as well.

@odzergaming

7 ай бұрын

787 is very cramped compared to A350

They are both brilliant aircraft. Having had the pleasure to fly them both a lot and be involved with the building of them. They are both fabulous planes, a thousand years ahead of an older plane.

The 707 will probably always be my favorite airliner, but I know the four engines are no longer efficient. When it was first introduced one of my neighbors took me to see it in person, and I was so impressed. I can appreciate the energy efficiency of todays jetliners like the Dreamliner, which has become my new favorite, but the 707 will always be my favorite beauty wise, where everything came together to create the perfect plane.

Have flown on a 787 5 times and every time it was a smooth flight and I fought the window shaders were amazing 🤩

Thanks Mate 👍

I am one of the three that watched to the end! I haven't flown either one; was supposed to have my first 787 flight in March with Virgin Atlantic, but then COVID happened and work cancelled my trip :( As someone who always likes to keep my window open, I thought the 787 window shades were a good idea to let you still see outside while not bothering your neighbor. I see it hasn't panned out that way! Hopefully one day I'll get to see what the fuss is all about.

I did Singapore Airlines 787 10 and Singapore Airlines A350 both in Jan this year and the A350 seemed more spacious within the economy cabin over all. 787 10 sounded a bit clunky , but that probably had to do with being seated near the wing. My other trips, all on 787 9's have been with Air New Zealand, Qantas and with Scoot and all pretty damn fine rides.

@ZeroG

Жыл бұрын

It sounds clunky because, underneath the pimp interior trim, is a shoddily made piece of garbage made by literal crackheads. They are all slowly coming unglued. Boeing had to recall a bunch of them but it's not going to be enough. Just a matter of time until they start falling out of the sky, probably on one of those transpacific Qantas flights. Good luck.

Ive flown in both, but pick the 787, mainly because of the extreme wing flex, and the nice design. Also it is very spacious. A350 is also great, but it feels smaller when I go inside. But a big part of that choice is because I wish to fly the 787 one day.

@odzergaming

6 ай бұрын

the 787 is nothing but spacious, it is the most cramped airliner ever

Either, as long as I’m flying. They’re both great planes from great companies.

I thought the term jungle jet was used to refer to the ERJ145 in reference to the Amazon in Embraer's home country Brazil...

Hi Scott, I actually flew with both of them. A350-900 with Singapore Airlines from Singapore - Milan while Oman Air B787-9 from London - Muscat. They are both an excellent bird. I will choose both of them as winner. It all depends the airlines that you fly with.

No love for the Canadian CRJ200... so sad. They've taken me many a times from Toronto to Sydney (YQY not SYD). They're a bit nicer than the old Dash 8-100s.

@jonpatterson

4 жыл бұрын

@Zayd M Aviation haha, its only about 2 hours from YYZ to Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada (YQY). Funny enough, every few years we get tourists arrive in our small little town who intended to visit Australia.

loved this video you can say what you want and feel

I have flown on both planes and I think that the 787 is much more powerful and also quieter and I really like the way the 787 gets up off the runway, it's like it floats up rather than just lifting up like the other planes do.

@odzergaming

6 ай бұрын

the A350 is quieter according to a decibal measurer

Haven’t flown on either one of them yet. But I do like the CRJ’s but only for very short, and I do mean short, flights.

I like them both but if I have to choose one I would choose the b787 but only by a little bit though

Haha! that 'cameo' appearance

Disagree about the 787 windows. I love them. Yes ok Boeing should never have given lockout to the crew, but apart from that they are great. I book a window seat to see out the window, its kind of the point, and regardless of dimmer settings on the 787 I can see out the window, as opposed to the outdated window shade on the A350. Also when it comes to opening the shades for landing, the 787 gradually increases the light level as opposed to whipping up the shades and getting greeted with the solar death ray instantly rendering you blind for the next 30 seconds.

@ethansaviation2672

4 жыл бұрын

Yes the windows on the 787 are amazing

Can you do a350 vs 777x when it comes out since that is its direct competitor

Never a Scott video without the shoes

I have flown the both 787 and A350 aswell as A380 and 747, All of these aircraft, The A380 wins for me because it had the most seat width and the quietest I ever flown on. Even though the A350 says it’s quieter, the A380 is actually 8 decibels quieter than the A350. That’s why it always wins for me.

i’ve flown on the a350 4 times with Qatar airways!! And i flew on the 787 3 times. Twice on Oman air and once with Qatar. I think i might prefer the a350 more.

Are the Jungle Jets of which you speak the CRJ-200s that are built in the Canadian Jungle?

I want to travel on both, I think they’re both unique in their own right!

I would choose the A350 because of the winglet/ wingtip. It is just a piece of art!

I would prefer the 350 for the wider seats. Outside of the size of the seats. I feel that both planes are quite similar

Haven’t flown a Dreamliner yet so at the moment it’s A350 for me

4You did some good vompairicents between the tw aircrafts while pointing out some of the good bad points of each type of air ctaf t R

Nice

Flown on both but on a long haul flight, the A350 edges it for me. Also, knowing how Boeing has been lately, with build quality and safety, I do have that in the back my mind when flying on their newer aircraft. Put me in any old Boeing aircraft before 787 and I've got no problem.

Definitely the 787. I've flown on each both directions from JFK-MAD and I've found that the 787 is a little bit quieter and fares better during turbulence in-flight than the '350, mainly due to (I believe) the rear engine cowling having that wavy flare. But to be honest, the sound of the GE's on the 787 during takeoff takes the win.

@trevorrund895

4 жыл бұрын

I agree

@Benutzername123

Жыл бұрын

in my experience it was the opposite. the 787 is considerably noisier during cruise. Especially wind noises from the outside and hydraulic noises. While take off the A350 is louder. When it comes to smoothness both are more o less the same. The A350 appears a bit more solid, while the 787 handles turbulences due to its extreme wingflex quite good. The dimmalbe windows are a nightmare. Cabin crew can make a daytime flight to a nightflight arbitrarily. What is the purpose of such huge windows when they are dimmed completly dark during 90 percent of the flight. Even during night flights. No possibility to see orange citylights from the sky and the stars above.

Good to see you as always. I give my vote to the A-350 mainly because of the ability of the cabin crew to control the windows in the B-787. Talk about triggered! Give a little power to any employee of any company or government office and you know that their proclivity to meanness will come shining through. I have actually screamed along with the KZreadr filming a great shot out of the window when...BAM...the window slowly darkens and the "shot of the flight" is ruined. UGH. 😂. Thanks for entertaining me today and also allowing me to comment about one of my all time pet peeves😊. Keep 'em coming buddy! ♥️🛫🙏🏽🌎

787

Love the A350! However still havent been on a 787 which is crazy but the airlines I often travel on internationally don't fly it, or somehow I've managed to avoid it! Definitely on my post covid to-do-list

Haven’t flown the A350 yet but my Boeing experience with United was amazing comfortable seats I liked the dim option it was awesome not to have a seat in front having the light shining straight through while you’re trying to sleep. One thing that no one takes into consideration are landings I’ve flown on A220 A321 A320 via JetBlue and every landing was a hard one. Versus the Boeing aircraft never had an issue always smooth even in rough weather via AA and United.

SANspotter. how do you feel about American and Delta retiring their CRJ-200 aircraft?

I like both the A350 & the 787 Dreamliner over older aircraft.

I have to rage about the people who hate the 787 windows being controlled by the crew. I was on LOT Polish 787 and the crew did dim the windows, but still gave control to the passengers. That was a mistake. A very few passengers undimmed their windows which created an effect like a pinhole camera and lit up the entire cabin. So I’m for crew controlled windows or lock out the settings up to 50% dimmed.

He lives!!! BTW that new SANspotter logo is fly (pun intended). As someone who suffers from Sahara-esque dry sinuses on long flights this video is well appreciated

A350 all the way!!!

I generally agree, but you absolutely have to consider the airline's choice of cabin layout. The same aircraft can be a totally different experience based on that. You have to research the seat pitch and width ahead of time. Also, the JAL 787 infotainment box in the foot resting area was murder from SAN to NRT. I love a window seat, but that has me looking at the middle-aisle seats to save some leg discomfort. No, actual leg pain.

Hey sanspotter, i haven't seen anyone do a review of the south bend airport on yt. Or atleast a good one. If you do for a vid book a trip from o'hare to south bend on delta. You'll be able to explain you hate for the crj 200 cuz thats what mostly fly to SB but my god is the view over the great lakes the most breathe taking view. 45 min flight but worth. congrats on the success on yt :)

Man, I am one the last 3 that watch your video. I really liked (Thumbs up pressed). Hope you keep on with this refreshing way of making planes and flight video. Thanks !! By the way, I love the 787, windows are great, so I have to disagree with you, but I do hate too that cabin crew can override your settings.

The spoiler alert is very true 🤣

Both are great

ironically boeing cockpits feels more appealing to me. Im hoping to go with boeing when I become commerical pilot. Btw, no matter how advanced the plane is, if you paint that cockpit into blue, its not advanced anymore but a cold war soviet flying tractor lmao.

What is the pressurization difference? I feel in general the airbuses (not the 350) have a higher pressurization and affects people who are sensitive to higher levels.

I love the A350, I think it looks fabulous and has a great interior no matter what airline operates it. However, I think the 787 is a bit hit or miss. Edit: No CRJ200s were harmed during the making of this video

@ndlben7129

4 жыл бұрын

Lol! "The 787 is a bit hit or miss"... This is why the 787 outsells the A350? ... 🙄

@_w_w_

4 жыл бұрын

@@ndlben7129 It is a hit and miss! Again, you don't fly a lot... When you are on the plane and spend more time in the air than on the ground, you will realize how true this statement is. United 787 looks like crap... JAL's 787 fares much better. Because 787 had a weight issue that the design did not achieve original planned operating efficiencies, Boeing told the airline to cut weight. Therefore, really really thin and lightweight seats were created... and 9th seat were inserted in economy to reach the promised per passenger operating efficiency claim. For crappy airlines that added 9th seat and used super thin seats, the experience is terrible. For the top performing airlines, like JAL, they kept the 8-abreast economy for their long haul fleet, and used high quality seats. Therefore, you really do get a very different experience. A350, on the other hand, is very very similarly configured... airline after airline, the experience is similar and very consistent, they all use 9-abreast economy and because of less weight restrictoin, they use higher quality seats, allowing for better passenger comfort.

@whiskerboii2466

4 жыл бұрын

@@_w_w_ Norwegian's 787... I don't think I can look at one the same way after riding one of them

@_w_w_

3 жыл бұрын

@@whiskerboii2466 I have been in one and it's not good.. I think you need to try the JAL 8-abreast or Singapore's 350's 9-abreast to realize Norwegians 787 economy is not great.

I've never flown in an A350 but if I had a choice I would avoid 787, or for that matter, any new Boeing products at all cost. The seats in the economy for 787 are so narrow you'd constantly rub shoulder with whoever sits next to you.. While the dimming windows and curving wings are nice gimmicks, the discomfort from the narrow seats truly makes it a nightmareliner, especially on an international flight that takes over 10 hours.

We want just want 1k subs! Awesome video as always. A-350 is hopefully in the near future

Evening Scott, In general, there are things I like about both aircraft and things I dislike about both aircraft. A350 I find to be more legroom/ spacious for passengers. B787 to me has much more comfortable seating. A/C for me sees Boeing install A/C that doesn't make my sinuses ache. Ergonomic layout of the seats, I think Boeing is better. On "sound pollution" I think Airbus have quieter aircraft I think. I look forward to your next video. PS I did stay until the end 😜

is the A350 the quietest aircraft so far ? how does it compare to the A380 ?

@odzergaming

7 ай бұрын

A380 is quieter

I have flown on both A350 and 787 frequently. I'd picked A350 any day. Quieter, more spacious, etc.

Too tight in economy on the 787

Great video mate and welcome back. As long as I am Business Class I do not really care !!!! Of course some Business Class seats are better than others...hello British Airways !! Dried snot !!! Ripper expression !! Fantastic review Scott and I stayed till the very end !! Boeing vs Airbus...safety in the air for me !! Take care mate and stay safe !!

i newer got time to fly one of them after all airports got lockdown

I just want to fly one of them. Like all my widebody flights have been legacy aircraft. I was supposed to fly OZ J to Japan on an a350 in may that covid cancelled. Then I am supposed to fly AC J to Japan on a 787 end of august that will likely cnacel. Ugh.

Have flown on the A350 Finnair and the 787 KLM and lot of 777s but yes the A350 is the best so far, it just seemed more comfortable brighter and less claustrophobic and does`nt have annoying windows.

I prefer 350 I was on a Lufthansa A-350 from O’hare to Munich and back and I loved the flights. It’s also my personal favorite plane. With that said I still like the 787 and plan to catch a flight in one in the near future.

@Ash-vm6vy

4 жыл бұрын

It's called A350, not A-350.

@Cars-N-Jets

4 жыл бұрын

Ashley Beard Fine I’ll change it for you but I don’t care if I say it right or wrong. There’s nothing wrong with saying A-350 but i guess I’ll change it for you.

@Cars-N-Jets

8 ай бұрын

@@Ash-vm6vyLol

How can you tell the difference between Boeing and Airbus?

I love the A350, it's more advanced in pretty much every aspect. Quieter, more spacious, wider seats, higher humidity levels and more! Regardless both are terrific aircraft The one thing that Is a super win for the Boeing 787 are the larger Windows.

If i had a choice to fly on which plane it'll be which ever one they provide on a private flight, as for these 2 which ever plane ticket is cheapest and which ever plane that ticket is on.

I'm normally a Boeing guy, but for some reason I'd take the 350 over 787 any day! Haven't flown an A350 yet, but every one of my 787 flights has been with American...between the cities of Dallas and Chicago or vice versa...

I prefer A350 more but still love B787! May I ask how could you afford to fly BC or FC often? What’s your secret to flying all the time?

Wholeheartedly agree on the CRJ comments. Very uncomfortable aircraft. I'm fairly small (5 foot 6/ 5 foot 7), and those seats feel incredibly tight.

I have flown the airbus on a Singapore to Helsinki flight, and I really liked it. I haven’t flown the 787 but I really like the a350

A350 pure and simple. As a proud American and frequent long-haul flyer, I have to swallow my pride. B787 is a good plane compare to the other aging Boeing fleet, but A350 is technically more advanced in every regard. In a practical manner, A350 is also more comfortable for passengers. Having flown both of them frequently, I would definite not fly in Economy on a B787, pure and simple.

@BubuchgaGaming

Жыл бұрын

How is the A350 more advanced? Every engineering video I’ve seen has been about how the 787 is such a technological marvel. I’m actually curious I’m not trying to start a fight!

@_w_w_

Жыл бұрын

@@BubuchgaGaming Are you joking?!?! A350 use more composite material, higher cabin humidity, lower noise level, more fuel efficient than B787. It has better bin design, better mood light design... I am an American, but objectively speaking, Airbus put in a lot of efforts to one up on Boeing and it shows... A350 left the factory hitting operating economics but B787 didn't. Much of the B787 savings comes from using super lightweight material in the cabin that airlines were forced to use earlier. Check out the first batch of B787 that are in the sky and you will see how badly they've aged.

@BubuchgaGaming

Жыл бұрын

@@_w_w_ I know the first batch of 787 had some issues, but I never really thought the A350 was THAT groundbreaking. I’ll look into it more, thanks!

@AliMohammed-ef8go

Жыл бұрын

​@@_w_w_ the 787 uses more carbon composite than the 350 and has higher humidity plus it has lower noise and most airlines are using the 10 abreast configuration. That makes it alot less comfortable than a 787.

@AliMohammed-ef8go

Жыл бұрын

​@@_w_w_ the 787 is more fuel efficient and has a cheaper operating cost.