Romans : We can’t defeat the Persians ! Persians: We can’t defeat the Romans ! Khalid Ibn Walid : I can solve your problems easily...

@someone_7233

3 жыл бұрын

DEFEAT THEM BOTH!!

@user-or1ud7uk5b

3 жыл бұрын

@@someone_7233 yup

@shuricake4567

3 жыл бұрын

lol

@R2jjj

3 жыл бұрын

That cheater always used to. Cheat

@ahsanaliiqbalansari2354

3 жыл бұрын

@@R2jjj lol that's a good excuse if you would have won you would say we crushed Muslims but Muslims crushed so you say cheater?

Spy: I have good news and bad news. Heraclius: What is the good news? Spy: Our army is bigger than the Muslims. Heraclius: the bad news? Spy: KHALID IBN AL-WALID

@KJ-is5ug

4 жыл бұрын

Not gonna lie tho, Khalid’s appearance looks like a caveman

@muftidavidwoodthetimetrave2592

4 жыл бұрын

This man copied a comment from the original video

@carpediem5884

4 жыл бұрын

Sword of Allah..

@razz-2977

4 жыл бұрын

@@carpediem5884 ❣️

@ishuikamakura272

4 жыл бұрын

@@KJ-is5ug "the caveman" is Sword of Allah

Khalid ibn alwaleed never lost a war in his entire life

@somethingsomething4002

4 жыл бұрын

He lost one, the trench one against salman al faressy

@mohamedyahyasbai6590

4 жыл бұрын

@@somethingsomething4002 yes and no, that was before he became a muslim, and he was not the commander at that time, plus they lost because of a strong wind that was literally destroying everything

@xXBlackIce7Xx

4 жыл бұрын

@@shareefqb so only losers turn into muslims? ha LOL

@user-ry7lr3pu8c

4 жыл бұрын

@@xXBlackIce7Xx No stupid, Islam was new and the Arabs were fighting everyone who converted to Islam in order not to spread, the only solution is war to take over the region; Thus practicing religion freely; Likewise, non-Muslims understand what true Islam is without distorting the stereotype of Islam

@arbenitkryeziu46

3 жыл бұрын

not me yeah he was a looser than after being a muslim now he is top 10 best commander in the world history!

Khalid ibn al waleed is so underrated as a military leader , he was so successful being mostly the underdog yet he is not as known as others like alexander the great , even though technically khalid ibn al waleed won more battles than Alexander and was also undefeated having never lost a battle he led

@MadMamluk88

4 жыл бұрын

To this day modern military academies study his tactics

@ramialmasrie808

4 жыл бұрын

@@MadMamluk88 true

@cherrymithila302

4 жыл бұрын

true. 100% right

@KJ-is5ug

4 жыл бұрын

Then, the Arab caliphate broke and they never rise to power again.

@medo96reme

4 жыл бұрын

@@KJ-is5ug Khilafah is not an Arab you idiot... It is a Muslim approach and Islam is in all around the globe... so maybe the next rise of Khilafah wont be in Arabic countries ... It may rise from your own country.. ✌️

630 AD *Rashidun has joined the game* *Sassanid has left the game*

@skyrusalive86

3 жыл бұрын

Bro you made my day with the most accurate joke of today...

@RexoryByzaboo

3 жыл бұрын

Rashidun joined the game in *632 AD* while Sassanid left in *651 AD.* Just correcting your meme.

@17813_

3 жыл бұрын

@@RexoryByzaboo you sir, are what you call a buzzkill and a person with bad humour.

@RexoryByzaboo

3 жыл бұрын

@@17813_ Haha, I'm just being historical.

@Spartans-bm9vd

2 жыл бұрын

@@RexoryByzaboo Rashidun left the game in 661AD.

Actually one of the interesting things in the islamic troops was the lack of fear during fighting in battles, since they all believed dying in the battlefield defending your faith and your people is a good cause, so when fighting someone who doesn’t care about his own life and has nothing to lose is a game changer (people has nothing but their swords)

@zanetlou1689

3 жыл бұрын

That is true we live for Allah and we die for allah

@skyrusalive86

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed

@khairiaris

3 жыл бұрын

For the early Caliphates, everything just came together... Just Cause, Morale, competent Generals, fragmented oppositions.. They were destined to rise..

@nativetube

3 жыл бұрын

@@skyrusalive86 but u fear for your own life u don't even love Allah

@skyrusalive86

3 жыл бұрын

@@nativetube how so?

رحم الله خالد بن الوليد و غفر له و رضي عنه و ارضاه و عن الخلفاء و الصحابة اجمعين

@user-px8dv3vy7g

3 жыл бұрын

الله يرحمهم ويغفر لهم رفعوا راية الاسلام وهم فخر الاسلام والمسلمين

@Sara-xx9wq

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-px8dv3vy7g امين

@hassaanahmad7453

2 жыл бұрын

آمین

We do not fight for money or anything else... We are fighting for highest word of truth ... لاأله ألا الله محمدا رسول الله

@imamzakirabbani7725

4 жыл бұрын

Yeahh

@Abhishek-sr2pu

3 жыл бұрын

Actually you guys did fight for money and political power. Religion can be used as political power. Oy when there is no leader in a religion then only that religion can be pure.

@carakasrank1euw919

3 жыл бұрын

@@Abhishek-sr2pu Islam is not the religion its the rules of god the god of Abraham

@smbosah_1667

3 жыл бұрын

No leader?😂😂 you think they playing games or something

@mohammedelaminazza5217

3 жыл бұрын

@@Abhishek-sr2pu yeah yeah that's why Khalid ibn al Walid refused that huge amount of money and lands from heracluis

I am admirer of Khalid ibn Alwaleed, one of the great general fought hundreds of battles and never lost the one. He is regarded as saif Allah(sword of Allah) and he has reason for that.

Khalid Ibn Al-Walid is an unbeatable general who never lost any battle even being outnumbered by 10 to 1 in the battle of firaz.

@timurthejerk9270

3 жыл бұрын

He’s lost before

@OSO_Savage

3 жыл бұрын

@@timurthejerk9270 what battle was that 😂🤣

@timurthejerk9270

3 жыл бұрын

OSO_Savage1400 no comment

@abdirahmandude6228

3 жыл бұрын

@@timurthejerk9270 hahaha

Someone's probably already mentioned, but they use footage from the Total War series of games. Total War: Rome 2 and Total War: Attila in particular, but also Empire: Total War, and Napoleon: Total War. The graphics that use the icons to indicate positions and whatnot are their own graphics, though.

@hammaadfahim1969

4 жыл бұрын

i was looking for this comment thanks!!!

@TheNaomeister

4 жыл бұрын

@@hammaadfahim1969 No problem at all!

@osmanosman509

4 жыл бұрын

TheNaomeister Where is your point??

@Y_mhfd

2 жыл бұрын

@@osmanosman509 nothing akhi its just a realistic animated game with huge armies to play with and tactics and stuff

The Muslims prayed towards Jeruseleum at first before Makkah. It was always a holyland

Morale is a huge part of war. You dont want a bunch of schmucks that are forced to fight. You want people that want to fight and have a reason and a main goal in mind and are at their 100%.

@matoff9466

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly.. This teacher is clueless. I was shocked when he asked that stupid question..obviously being one ethnic group and one religion and one shared goal will give you more unity and better odds. Bezentyne troups were devided and probably most of them didnt even wanna be there..

@melanisticmandalorian8909

2 жыл бұрын

@@matoff9466 Also one language, vs many languages trying to give battle orders and communicate with other commanders.

1- The withdrawal of the Muslims from Damascus 2- The leader Abu Ubaidah abdicated to Khalid bin Al-Walid 3- The battle itself, the genius leader Khalid was unable to attack until the sixth day. All of this is evidence that the Byzantine army was several times larger than the Muslim army

They do many things outside of wars and battles, like the Roman economy system.

Thank you for being very respectful of my religion and having that knowledge you have just earned a sub and like.

@sultanalswaje8157

2 жыл бұрын

تمزح ؟! ما اشوفه كان محترم لهدرجة..بالعكس يقول اكيد ان المسلمين زودوا عدد الفرس عشان يخلون الانتصار طعم اكثر

Kings and generals is a gem. One of my favorite history channels.

@predatrz

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah also mine

@nativetube

3 жыл бұрын

@J nope that won't be

@vatem9870

3 жыл бұрын

@J there lot history channel show christian victory you gotta find em

@mohammadmehdi1960

3 жыл бұрын

@J if you mean in the time of the rashidun caliphate or the umayyads ,no the christian victories doesn't exist the christians defeated only the ottomans and the taifas of iberia

@tgducsfdifxdt4533

3 жыл бұрын

@@mohammadmehdi1960 dude the Christian nubians defeated the Muslims in 641AD and the byzantines won many battles during the mid 7century

Just to clarify, Ali was never a contender as a direct succecion of the prophet nor was there any discussion about prophet's lineage should be inherretor. The emergence of Shi'a only happens during Ali's reign, not after the prophet's death. However, there were a split between two camps the quraish (mecca's origins people) and the ansar (the madina's indigenous). Both wanted to have their own leader, as the qurasih put forward Abu Bakr and the ansar sets up Abu Ubaydah as their leader. they ended up come to agreement that they can't afford to have two camps under one banner.

@markm5758

4 жыл бұрын

Abu Hadrami couldn’t disagree more, there was a faction led by Ali that wanted him for leadership (known as shiat Ali) and another faction (led by abu sufyan’s family and clan) that wanted someone of their own to be decided, in fact the ansar were in agreement with them and against giving succession to someone in the prophet’s family (who were giving ghusl to his body at the time), ultimately they decided on giving it to abu bakr in order to usurp the succession from the ahlulbayt

@loscholchoneros3767

4 жыл бұрын

@Adil sidd Ali was 12 years

@loscholchoneros3767

4 жыл бұрын

And one of the firsts or maybe the first .. we love Abu Bakr and Ali radia Allaho 3anhom.. no différence..

@FuryOfTheSwarm

4 жыл бұрын

@Adil sidd Abu Bakr RA wasn't the first one to accept Islam. The first to accept Islam was the great lady Khadija, may the infinite rehm of Allah be upon her, the next person to accept Islam was Ali, when the prophet first professed his message to outsiders, he had gathered his relatives and asked who among them would support his mission, and at that point in time only Ali accepted the call, at this point in time the prophet had not yet married Aisha RA and thus didn't have relationship with Abu Bakr RA, he would convert to Islam later. Additionally, the split between Shia and Sunni did not occur much later, at the battle of Saffin, after the adjucation, those who supported Muawiyah were called sunni, and those who supported Ali were shias. Transposed into english, we can think of this as traditionalists vs loyalists in terms of name sake. You defy the decree of the quran and label shias as rafida but do not even know the basic history of Islam. It is interesting that the names Sunni and Shia are only important to the ones who lack knowledge of these matters. The great Ulema of the Sunni, Shia, Suffi, and numerous other groupings do not care for these titles and stand against it.

I like how when covering this glorious conquest western "historians" always start off by making excuses 5:20 "weakened, exhausted yada yada yada". Lmao no, the Muslims were ALWAYS always heavily outnumbered. By at least 2 to 1 in literally every battle

@trockenerkakau6585

2 жыл бұрын

Whats about Muslim "historians" who Claim that Khalid defeated 70k at haizr but it was around 7k

6:12 actually, election of Abu Bakr As-Shiddiq becaming caliph wasn't the time when Islam "splitted" into Sunni and Shia, it came actually far later, during the end of reign of Ali ibn Abi Thalib, and also have pivotal role for creating the Ummayad caliphate. And even it became clearly during battle of Karbala, which is came later. As for the successor after the death of Rasulullah Mohammed peace be upon him, at that moment, there were basically misunderstood that a bit far off (quite a long story, and the source itself quite murky and not much mentioned in western source). But not really came into fight or bloodshed (even Ali himself more leaning towards Abu Bakr to became the caliph, and why not? Abu Bakr and Rasulullah basically quite like Batman and Robin, support each other highly and regard each other with respected friendship) and therefore it wasn't much disagreement in the end, no such breakup (yet) and it fixated that Abu Bakr became caliph

@FuryOfTheSwarm

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you for knowing our history! Yes brother/sister, the ummah did not split until the battle of saffin, (battle of the spear)

@osamashaaban3985

3 жыл бұрын

True, I was about to write that

@argyrendehringterimksaccu174

2 жыл бұрын

@@FuryOfTheSwarm saffin another word\synonym of sayf? Like sadisatun is older root of cardinal six in Arabic?

@FuryOfTheSwarm

2 жыл бұрын

@@argyrendehringterimksaccu174 saif is a sword, saffin is a spear.

@argyrendehringterimksaccu174

2 жыл бұрын

@@FuryOfTheSwarm omg I'm sorry a bit sleep deprived on that one yeah I totally missed it

Absolutely love the fact you reviewed one of these. I'm going through all your videos now and I would love to see more down the road

The legendary Khalid ibn alwalid easily ranks amongst the best generals in history .

@IntellectOnly

2 жыл бұрын

Not ranks among the best. He is the best. Can't be compared to others. Most others if not most had a large army, military experience is wars. This guy had nothing and countless battles one after one. Tell me in history anyone who took on the largest strongest empires with a single army of 40k at most ? None.

@trockenerkakau6585

2 жыл бұрын

@@IntellectOnly Alexander the great Destroyer the persian Empire with 40k troops in 8 years around 900 years before khalid

One of the most important battles in history, sealing the downfall of Eastern Christianity. The world would've been unrecognizable today if the Byzantines had won then.

@ahmaddddd100

3 жыл бұрын

True, and the golden age of Muslim knowledge would have been lost, something like algebra would have been delayed till the 16th century till it is discovered by someone else, nd this is just a tiny exampel

@irtazaazam6972

2 жыл бұрын

I remember when you had a ton of Hellsing Ultimate content on your channel. Didn't think I'd see your channel here.

@KaNoMikoProductions

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmaddddd100 Doubtful. I'd guess we'd have gotten there quicker, but considering the magnitude of the impact of this battle, it's hard to guess how history would've unfolded.

@KaNoMikoProductions

2 жыл бұрын

@@irtazaazam6972 Yeah, ultimately decided I wanted to scrub my channel clean, but I decided to keep using the account rather than make a new one.

@ahmaddddd100

2 жыл бұрын

@@KaNoMikoProductions doubtful? When all people are living peacefully under one banner is slowing things down then you should reread history or stop hating on us and that's it. Baghdad had 2 million books while whole Europe had couple hundred and this shows you that massive gap between the 2 worlds back then, all of this was stopped by the Mongols invasion that saked so many cities in the east, short after an exhausting conflicts with crusades. Look at Spain under the Muslim rule and rest of Europe back in the day, it's like comparing Newyork to Newdelhi

They do have some videos about the roman economy and how important egypt was. You might want to check that one out.

Finally, he started watching Kings and Generals probably the best history channel out there. I have to admit this is one of their older video and the quality increased a lot nowadays. They got a new narrator too. Yes they use a game to simulate the battles, I thinnk it´s total war , but Iam not sure.

14:58 "Moral" wasn't the right word. "Cohesion" is a better one. The Arab army at this time was almost entirely of one ethnic background, spoke one language, and practiced the same religious rites.

@alhashmy1310

2 жыл бұрын

There were Persians and Christians among Islamic army back then .

@evalationx2649

2 жыл бұрын

@@alhashmy1310 Not enough to matter.

The Muslims compare to the Persian and the roman were like the Eskimos to the USA and Russia. Imagine the eskimo taking on the Russian and USA. These 2 empires had more manpower experience skills,so having fought against each other in the past had no effect except experience

The claim about the morale ...I think they said that because as said earlier the romans barely took back control, and the population was "hostile" against rome yet the byzantian king began recruiting So in a way I hate the boss and he sends me to war?? I think they meant this.

Kings and Generals is fantastic, you should definitely watch some more of their videos. Their more recent videos have a different narrator and much better production value.

@yunisturabov9118

4 жыл бұрын

History Match's Yarmouk video is better than Kings and Generals

@Schmidty1

4 жыл бұрын

@@yunisturabov9118 History Marche is the correct spelling. I agree that History Marche's video is way better.

@Schmidty1

4 жыл бұрын

Yes they do much better videos now.

"7:20" i wanna tell you that the Roman Empire and the Sassanian fought together Khalid Ibn Al-Walid at the battle of Firaz (the Muslims were about 15 thousands and the coalition was about 200 thousands) and the Muslims won by the bless of Allah.

The greatest worriers of the history . Never lost out of over 200 battle . Great worrier May Allah grant us understanding

I adore that you were just over a minute in, and immediately thought of us

This looks interesting... I needed to know when the battle was and found this reaction 😊

For the details of tactics they used mostly arabic sources. Contact me for greek and arabic list of sources.

No one can break the record of KHALID BIN WALID

Heraclius to the emissary bringing the news of the defeat after the battle,why are we still losing,we are more and more stronger than them,and the emissary replied because we are corrupt and they are so humble and they just keep praying,lol,good answer!

16:25 this stuff is their own graphic, any graphic that involves the big 3d animated armies is from total war

This is what we call war tactics!!! Hail to the sword of Allah-Khalid Ibn Al Walid.👏👏

you gotta watch the more recent videos of Kings & Generals. their animations are hugely improved, Devin is an amazing narrator.

You should try overly sarcastic productions. they are entertaining and very informative. Really liking the videos so far, it's good that KZread has a reaction channel that gives credit where it's due. keep it up

@copperhamster

4 жыл бұрын

History Summarized: Alcibiades is just great.

Kings and Generals actually does great videos on historical origins of specific groups of people, nations, and other things, aside from tactical battles.

I just realized that from 2017 wow there so much better now for the graphics now

Muslems : 30000 Bizantin troups : 200000 The end is dramatic for the bizantin....all is about faith

Dude I swear I wish you were my history teacher. You are so passionate about history and I can see from your videos that you love teaching this subject. My history teacher just sits in the class scrolling through his phone after telling us to just mindlessly read the textbook😭

On your part regarding whether morale matter. I agree that it would be hard to substantiate which side had an upper hand, but morale and the sway of it frequently plays an important role in determining the course and outcome of battles.

Would've thought you'd react to one of their more recent videos which are of much higher quality with a lot of effort in them. Either way, great vid!

@Onio_

4 жыл бұрын

The video hasn't even finished yet, how do you know it's great?

@YAH2121

4 жыл бұрын

@@Onio_ watched it during the premier

@Onio_

4 жыл бұрын

@@YAH2121 I commented during the premiere

@YAH2121

4 жыл бұрын

@@Onio_ neat

They said "How you destroyed the two biggest empire in the same time" Rashidun caliphate "Yes

it does matter because when you fight for something you beileve in your willing to die for it causes unity among the ranks having the same bielef. when ur ranks n ideoligies differ its easier to be routed n not be unified

Actually there wasn’t any early splits between the disciples regarding who should lead. It was an unanimous decision and approval from companions of the prophet that Abu Bakar should become the successor to our prophet, followed by Umar. It was Umar (2nd Caliph) who then made a committee of the best worshippers who would choose the 3rd Caliph. The splits came between sunni and shias after Ali’s death.

Wow, I forgot the quality of the earlier videos.

At the early islamic days the unity of the arab people under one faith gave them a huge morale boost which made them win many battles while being outnumbered that's what lies behind the statement of "arabs had better morale".

Do more reactions to Kings and generals they are a great guys who make great history videos

You should check out history buffs. The channel focuses on the accuracy of movies that are either historical or based on an actual event.

Excellent critique

You say everyone's trying to survive but no. For Muslims, to die while fighting for Allah's cause is basically a freeway ticket to heaven so they were not trying to survive but to fight without a fear of death.

@ast9627

4 жыл бұрын

Making a lot of assumptions here....yes dying while fighting for Allah is guaranteed heaven if god wills it, they fought for Allah not to just throw themselves aimlessly and get cut down.

The right flank cuze the river is on the left..also as we all know during those times the military tactics were similar to those we heard about during Carthage vs Rome battles when Hannibal made great use of the geography and terrain to win battles.khalid IBN alwalid is known to have used some of Hannibal war tactics

That is from total war 1212 AD think

the fighting you see is probably total war Attila, likely with some mods to make it look better. though it looks like several total war games are used

I often asked my history teachers this question. As a historian we have the benefit of hindsight and see the bigger picture, but in that specific time how would the actors behave on their limited knowledge? We were all wondering in class what the world order, society, economy, xenophobia, resource allocation, future tensions between nations and these other tidbits that make the world work play out as. Fascinating to have such constructive idea sharing during class when class time is over and we have some free time.

Khalid ibn al-Walid is considered a hero of the Battle of Yarmouk, in which the Muslims defeated the Romans in Damascus, and then condemned them to control over the Levant. The battle began on August 15, 663 AD, corresponding to 15 AH, and ended within six days on August 20. from the same year

Khalid bin Walid (RA) was the unsheathed sword of Almighty Allah (SWT). He never lost an war.

One question! How are there slavs in the Byzantine army if they came in Balkan around 640-650 year?

@DonDiego724

4 жыл бұрын

They came earlier.

@argyrendehringterimksaccu174

2 жыл бұрын

@@DonDiego724 yup even varangians met ibn fadlan also called the elite guards of byzantines

The first Crusade began more than four hundred years after the events you see.

FYI since you asked That channel uses a mix of things like graphics, video games etc i believe they use total war attila on this with modifications. the game is actually beautiful (real time strategy) in many other videos they use the same video game series "Total war"

The war that Abu Bakr (RA) was fighting against the fellow arabs after the Prophet's (SAW) death was called the war of riddah and it was about the tribes and people who didnt really believe in or understand the religion so the fact that the Prophet (SAW) died was out of the comprehension of the latter and an oppurtunity for the former. It wasnt a war about who would succeed as Caliph. Those didnt arise until Uthman (RA) and/or Ali (RA)

You’re right we love multiplying by 10, all 100 million of us.

He's so powerful till Umar ibn Khattab had to fire him on a battle cuz Muslims believe they won bcuz of Khalid ibn Al Waled and not bcuz of Allah. Mashallah

Khalid Bin Walid and his Companions were True Muslims that's the reason why he was able to beat the ass of Superpowers. Today noone is a True Muslim sad but true 😔...

I have not read of a multiethnic army having higher morale. As loyalties are not recorded to be high between groups. I doubt there is evidence of specific motivations.

Well, Bias in history is also different for each nation/peoples. For example: Battle of Borodino was one of the biggest battles during Napoleonic Wars. Russians lost the battle, abandoning more then 30 thousand wounded to their’s fate. Moscow was then burned, with many villages (some of them with local population that refused to comply. land scorching.) burned as well by Russian army. It was a horrible defeat, that is now celebrated and praised by Russian history books and state propaganda as tactical genius and the sole reason for Napoleon’s defeat. (even thought disruption of supply lines and horrible and totally brutal winter were the actual reasons for napoleons retreat).

The details come from muslim historians and leaders and byzantine historians that were there in the battles and muslim history is so memorised that details are still here with us, and also accounts of the people there.

Most of the details of the war they got from modern historians who have researched this battle. The primary sources relied on by these scholars to gather all these details are: Kitab Futuh al-Buldan ("Book of the Conquest of the Lands"), 9th century Fatuh al Sham (Conquest of Syria), 8th century Chronicle of Fredegar, 658 Dionysius Telmaharensis (774), Chronicle of Pseudo-Dionysius of Tell-Mahre Ibn Ishaq (750), Sirah Rasul Allah Ibn Khaldun (1377), Muqaddimah The Maronite Chronicles, 664 Pseudo-Methodius (691), Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (915), History of the Prophets and Kings Theophanes the Confessor (810-815), Chronographia Thomas the Presbyter, Chronicle, 7th century Fragment on the Arab Conquests, 636 Chronicle of 819 So from both Byzantine and Arab sources they have constructed this narrative. Of course this is usually what happens in early history where the accounts surviving are those of the victors and the losers. Of course there will be BIAS in accounts from both sides, but historians sift through these narrations to form a coherent picture, how accurate that will be from what took place will always be the question, but thats true for a lot of battles.

I highly recommend Kings and Generals Mesopotamian Civilisations 3 part series. It's much more up your alley. Starts with "Rise of Sumer: Cradle of Civilisation".

Do you remember the show Decisive Battles?

Battle of Yarmouk Romans = 240k Arabs = 36k

@rinkebymannendinmorsa9099

4 жыл бұрын

Arabs was always less amount of people than the enemy when they fought in the battle field and still the Arabs won and im proud.

@rinkebymannendinmorsa9099

4 жыл бұрын

@Bosniak Warrior yes that is true, but the arabs was also strong and large people at that time.

@skyrusalive86

3 жыл бұрын

It's not about Arabs, it's about Muslims.

@littlefinger7522

3 жыл бұрын

@@skyrusalive86 99% of the Army back then is Arabic

@skyrusalive86

3 жыл бұрын

@@littlefinger7522 it was but it wasn't as important as being Muslims.

Are you allowed to drunk history? Or is that a copyright claim

Mr. Tyler, the Shia - Sunni rift wasn't over Abu Bakr becoming the first Caliph. It had moreso to do with Uthman being chosen over Ali to become the Caliph. Ali was dealing with the Prophet's funeral arrangements when Abu Bakr was chosen. I believe the rift happened when Uthman became the Caliph. If I'm wrong, correct me.

Well the reason the Muslims had more moral is actually a very simple reason. When would you have a higher morale? When fighting alongside random people from different ethnicities and different religions or when fighting with your brothers? Khalid ibn walid told vahan: “and you will face men who love death as you love life” the Muslims fought for their faith and they believed that dying as a martyr on the battlefield was of the highest honor.

To clarify, the Rightly Guided Caliphate is not like a hereditary monarchy system, and the term Khalifa means someone who succeeds the Prophet in the leadership of Muslims, and it is a position in which the Caliph has the powers to command armies and order their movement and the authority to declare war and organize people’s economic and social conditions and all of this according to the Sharia of Islam. The Caliph, about the application of Sharia, Muslims have the right to fight him, restore him to righteousness or dismiss him, and the Caliphate system is a system by which the best of people and guide them rule and all Muslims agree to it. One of his cousins, but he was his close friend, minister, and the best of people after the Prophet (Abu bakr), and this is according to the testimony of all the companions, including Ali bin Abi Talib, and after the death of the Prophet, the companions agreed on Abu Bakr and all of them pledged allegiance to him, and they gave him the pledge of allegiance except for two, namely Ali and Al-Zubayr, because they were both Busy, Ali was busy washing the Prophet and burying him, the second day Abu Bakr went to Ali himself and got the pledge of allegiance from Ali twice, once in secret and once in public, and when Abu Bakr fell ill and was going to die, he decided to make the best of people after him a caliph, he was better People after him is Omar he was a believing man and the Prophet loved him and gave him the glad tidings of Paradise. Umar rejected the caliphate but then accepted it, after the death of Abu Bakr Omar received the caliphate and Umar was not one of Abu Bakr’s family and he was not one of his relatives, and when Omar was stabbed while he was praying, some of the companions pointed out to him To appoint his son Abdullah bin Omar, but he refused, because if he did this, he would show his son over other companions, and also because the caliphate is not hereditary, and he did not want to stray from the essence of the rightly-guided caliphate, which is the shura, before he dies he identified six righteous companions who choose one of them to be the caliph and One of those whom he chose was Ali. After that, Uthman bin Affan, who was the son-in-law of the Prophet and married to the two daughters of the Prophet, was chosen. Then a sedition occurred and the Kharaj Uthman was killed. The conclusion from this is that the Shiites are a sect that emerged after the Prophet Muhammad, and it is a misguided sect that declares Muslims and companions to be infidels, and even that they disbelieved the wives of the Prophet Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, who came, may God be pleased with them, in the Noble Qur’an, and they also disbelieved Abu Bakr, who is the father of the Prophet’s wife, Omar and He is the father of the Prophet's wife, Ali's daughter-in-law, and Osman, the Prophet's son-in-law.

It means they are fighting for one cause versus the others fighting for multiple reasons and mercenaries will give up easier to live to fight another day as they are fighting for money and no money when dead

I think you should do more reaction videos on kings and generals documentary!

Terry, the History teacher needs to learn from the History professor at Austin School about how and why the Muslim Arabs were able to defeat two superpowers simultaneously. Watch Dr Roy's Khalid Ibn Al-Walid, a profile of a warrior on YT.

@MrTerry

Жыл бұрын

Funny timing. I’ve actually been studying this recently.

@ksa8226

Жыл бұрын

@@MrTerry غبي

@su-35-ou3nq

2 ай бұрын

learn some manners disgusting @@ksa8226

A man who is equal to 1 billion soldiers, the man who wins hundred battles. "The Sword of Allah" Khalid ibn Walid.

He crushed the super power of his times🔥 The undefeated commander Khalid Bin Waleed R.A💛

I would suggest the Hussite Wars because a lot of people never heard of then and I think they are one of the starting points of the Protestan Reformation.

The Battle of Badr was prophesied, in the Bible, by the Prophet Isaiah (a.s.). It was described as a battle between the sons of Ishma’il (a.s.); the children of Tema who settled in Yathrib, and the children of Kedar who settled in Bakka. Muhammad (s.a.w.) was rejected by his people in Makkah, known in the Old Testament as “Bakka”, and migrated to Madina, which was previously called Yathrib. The specific passage is here: Isaiah 21:13-17 13 The burden in Arabia. In the forest at evening you shall sleep, in the paths of Dedanim. 14 Meeting the thirsty bring him water, you that inhabit the land of the south, meet with bread him that flees. 15 For they are fled from before the swords, from the sword that hung over them, from the bent bow, from the face of a grievous battle. 16 For thus says the Lord to me: “Within a year, according to the years of a hireling, all the glory of Kedar shall be taken away. 17 And the residue of the number of strong archers of the children of Kedar shall be diminished: for the Lord the God of Israel has spoken it.”

apparently khalid before his conversion planned to work for the romans against the sassanids

That depate happened twenty years after the battle of yarmouk.

can you please do more from Kings and Generals? They are really good.

My favourite type of pizza is pepperoni.

36000 arab VS 260 000 roma 😂🤔

Don't forget 240k vs 36k , just see the big big big gap between them

@goldroger6151

3 жыл бұрын

@Juni Kim I'm sorry but they were NOT notorious , Arab Muslim people at that time they had A STRONG GENERAL LEADING THEM AND A STRONG FAITH

@jisookryu8973

3 жыл бұрын

Sorry, Its my other account of juni kim but I meant not to say notorious but to say known.sorry.

@goldroger6151

3 жыл бұрын

@@jisookryu8973 it's fine , I'm happy you apologized , ANYWAYS I'm sorry if I was a bit too much there Because the past people should always be remembered and never to say anything bad about them

yes, more content

3:42 I believe that they use the total war series of games to make these videos.

I don't think this historical teacher knows what he's talking about

Why not also check out HistoryMarche's version of Battle of Yarmouk? They have details not shown by K&G's that you may be interested in.

يعتبر خالد بن الوليد بطلا من أبطال معركة اليرموك التى انتصر فيها المسلمون على الروم فى دمشق، ومن ثم دانت لهم السيطرة على بلاد الشام، وقد بدأت المعركة فى الخامس عشر من أغسطس عام 663 ميلادية الموافق 15 هجرية، وانتهت فى غضون ستة أيام فى 20 أغسطس من نفس السنة.

About the roman troop numbers remember the roman saw what happened to the Persians and they wanted to prove they are stronger than the Persians so they gathered 5 armies from different nations in one huge army

Civilization Rap - Dan Bull A short song about human history

Did you watch Omer series! There is many historical things including this battle .. The Byzantines were near 200 thousand and the Muslims were less than 50 thousand. Therefore, Khaled Ibn Al-Walid used different strategies and plans. The Battle of Yarmouk was one of the most important battles that made Khaled Ibn Al-Walid one of the greatest generals in history..