A cool integral for Apery's constant (ζ(3)): int 0 to 1 (x(1-x))/sin(πx)

Zeta(3) is the main character for today's episode with a guest appearance from the number iconically associated with Christiano Ronaldo.
Series expansion for ln(2sin(x)) and ln(2cos(x)):
• My take on this on won...
pCtkEYJLN8...

Пікірлер: 38

  • @The1RandomFool
    @The1RandomFool11 ай бұрын

    Before watching the video, the substitution I made was pi/2*x = u, then used the double angle formula for sin in the denominator of the integrand. In the numerator, I used the fact that sin^2 u + cos^2 u = 1, then integrated by parts.

  • @monikaherath7505

    @monikaherath7505

    11 ай бұрын

    Could you write it out please I don't understand how you got to sin^2 u + cos*2 u

  • @The1RandomFool

    @The1RandomFool

    11 ай бұрын

    sin^2 u + cos^2 u = 1 is a basic trigonometric identity. In general, it's a strategy to cancel out a product of sines and cosines in the denominator by setting 1 = sin^2 u + cos^2 u in the numerator.@@monikaherath7505

  • @CamiKite
    @CamiKite6 ай бұрын

    Using Euler reflexion formula you can also show that 7ζ(3)/pi^2 = integral(gamma(3/2-x)*gamma(3/2+x)) from -1/2 to 1/2. It doesn't help to integrate, but it's beautiful ;-)

  • @carlosgiovanardi8197
    @carlosgiovanardi819711 ай бұрын

    GREAT!! An interesting class of integrals: integrate from 0 to 1 [ x^n (1-x)^m / sin(πx)].

  • @MrWael1970
    @MrWael197011 ай бұрын

    Thank you for this innovative integration. Smart solution.

  • @gregsarnecki7581
    @gregsarnecki758111 ай бұрын

    Awesome integral!

  • @manstuckinabox3679
    @manstuckinabox367911 ай бұрын

    Bro was like LOL do it by parts and stuff but really didn't bother by going the distance, great video as always brother.

  • @maths_505

    @maths_505

    11 ай бұрын

    Thanks mate. I've been looking for an integral to use that series on

  • @gjjkhjkk9241
    @gjjkhjkk9241Ай бұрын

    Hi, use the properties of the gamma function like is relation to 1/sin(x.pi) and x(x-1)

  • @bartekabuz855
    @bartekabuz85511 ай бұрын

    Bring back dark thumbnail 1/4

  • @maths_505

    @maths_505

    11 ай бұрын

    Okay tomorrow

  • @quentinrenon9876
    @quentinrenon987611 ай бұрын

    Nice one ! I now challenge you to solve the integral from 0 to pi of x * (sinx)^n dx. It took me around an hour or 2 to solve and is absoluetly gorgeous

  • @grigoriefimovitchrasputin5442

    @grigoriefimovitchrasputin5442

    11 ай бұрын

    Thanks ! It looks interesting to solve

  • @quentinrenon9876

    @quentinrenon9876

    11 ай бұрын

    @@grigoriefimovitchrasputin5442 Tbh it's not too difficult but you need to be creative, normal methods don't work. Or at least I couldn't get very far using them

  • @grigoriefimovitchrasputin5442

    @grigoriefimovitchrasputin5442

    11 ай бұрын

    @@quentinrenon9876 it looks like Wallis integrals, except that there is a x. Anyway, i'll give it a try

  • @alarka1782

    @alarka1782

    11 ай бұрын

    I think by applying property of integral, it breaks into pi * integral 0 to pi/2 (sin x) ^ n dx. Should be easy from there to express in terms of gamma function.

  • @user-uh9bo2im1h

    @user-uh9bo2im1h

    11 ай бұрын

    Should be doable by integrating by x = sqrt(x) then u = x/2 and then letting u be sin x which leads to a structure very similar to the beta function can’t rlly go further because I have no pen rn

  • @julianwang7987
    @julianwang79878 ай бұрын

    Isn't the essence of the proof the following Fourier Expansion for csc(x) = 2 SUM_odd (sin(nx))?

  • @KalininEvgen
    @KalininEvgen11 ай бұрын

    It looks like it can be generalised. If n=3, then ans can be written as (2n+1)zeta(n)/pi^{n}. May be exist some types of integrals which are generalised that way?

  • @austin4768

    @austin4768

    4 ай бұрын

    Yes I’m also curious if there are analogous formulas for zeta of odd (or even all) n. One can go try to go back through the calculation and find a point where the integrand can be tweaked in such a way to yield this kind of formula. I’m too lazy to do this right now though

  • @giuseppemalaguti435
    @giuseppemalaguti43511 ай бұрын

    Corretto, ❤ho usato sinx, formula esponenziale, poi la serie geometrica... Anche se a me risulta un segno -... Ah ah, al primo colpo non mi viene mai... Ok, il segno - è scomparso... Is correct

  • @PhilesArt
    @PhilesArt11 ай бұрын

    cr7 fan here too xD, loved that one 👍

  • @maths_505

    @maths_505

    11 ай бұрын

    SUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

  • @natepolidoro4565
    @natepolidoro456511 ай бұрын

    Didn't go the way I thought

  • @physicsiseasy2623
    @physicsiseasy262311 ай бұрын

    I love your solution though I don't understand one of your solution. I'm an A level student.😊

  • @maths_505

    @maths_505

    11 ай бұрын

    Oh cool....I used to tutor A level students..... Thanks bro....you'll understand them all pretty soon cuz you'll study the basics in your A levels....then you'll solve these integrals and DEs on your own.

  • @damrgee8279
    @damrgee827911 ай бұрын

    How is this applied to every day life?

  • @insouciantFox

    @insouciantFox

    11 ай бұрын

    Integrals are everyday life

  • @daddy_myers

    @daddy_myers

    11 ай бұрын

    Integrals are life.

  • @damrgee8279

    @damrgee8279

    11 ай бұрын

    @@daddy_myers example please

  • @daddy_myers

    @daddy_myers

    11 ай бұрын

    @@damrgee8279 Your question alone indicates you could use more integrals in your daily life.

  • @damrgee8279

    @damrgee8279

    11 ай бұрын

    @Jacques-kc4qy it’s amazing that people like yourself are incredibly smart when it comes to this stuff I don’t understand any of it, But yet when it comes to political leanings regarding logic and common sense we have some of the stupidest people on the planet