A Canada-Germany Hydrogen Scandal?

Ғылым және технология

James Fleay, an engineer and project manager in the energy sector, joins Dr. Keefer to discuss the "Hydrogen Alliance" proposed between Canada and Germany.
This Hydrogen Alliance is coming under increasing scrutiny due to allegations of a conflict of interest arising out of the Premier of Newfoundland, Andrew Furey's luxury trip to a lodge owned by Canadian billionaire John Risley this summer. Risley happens to be one of the principal investors in a project called Nujio’qonik, one of three projects competing to be part of the Canada-Germany Hydrogen Alliance alongside EverWind Fuels in Nova Scotia and the Port of Belledune project in New Brunswick.
Beyond a potential political scandal lies a very real energy scandal. Fleay describes the chemistry, thermodynamics, and economics required to turn electrons generated by wind turbines in Canada into ammonia to be shipped across the Atlantic to be burned in German Power plants, a process which he describes as being "The least efficient way to get electrons on the German grid imaginable." Decouple takes a look at who will foot the bill and who will profit. The total output of the Canada German Hydrogen Alliance which requires a near doubling of Canada's total national wind fleet, expensive electrolysis equipment, ammonia production through the energy intensive Haber Bosch process, large scale shipping and potential energy hungry reconversion to hydrogen for burning as fuel in German thermal plants is almost equal to the output of a single German nuclear station, ISAR 2, one of the three remaining nuclear plants still under threat of closure in Germany. With the myth of cheap Canadian exportable hydrogen as a tool to replace Russian natural gas busted we examine Canada's only truly green and ultra low carbon energy export: its nuclear technology and uranium which is already used in near carbon free power plants domestically and around the world offsetting a full 1/3 of Canada's total all sector emissions. Hang onto your hats. This is an interesting one.
Support Decouple on Patreon: / decouple
Learn more about Decouple Media: www.decouplemedia.org
Note: This is a reuploaded version with an edited introduction.

Пікірлер: 202

  • @Marley-ii6ls
    @Marley-ii6ls3 ай бұрын

    I would be more fearful for my children to be living in a totalitarium, dystopian world controlled by climate czars, than a world where you are challenged by weather patterns that have plagued people throughout history.

  • @hasmond6808

    @hasmond6808

    3 ай бұрын

    Okay but what happens once the fossil fuels start running out?

  • @Marley-ii6ls

    @Marley-ii6ls

    3 ай бұрын

    @hasmond6808 when will that be?

  • @davidelliott5843

    @davidelliott5843

    2 ай бұрын

    We need to reduce our use of fossil fuels. The resource is not endless. But lies involving CO2 do not help. People are not stupid. We need nuclear power and we even more need reactors the fully burn the fuel. That prevents there being any long term waste and gets 20x as much power per unit of fuel.

  • @dixonhill1108

    @dixonhill1108

    2 ай бұрын

    Hate to bust your bubble, this is gonna run on hydroelectricity. Odd the video makers didn't know this but we constructed massive hydroelectricity capacity with no way for that energy to get to market, problem of being on an island and all that. It's pretty clear this is gonna end up being fueled by hydroelectric.

  • @altosack

    @altosack

    2 ай бұрын

    Well, isn’t it fortunate for us all this is a textbook example of a false dichotomy, to the point of being nonsense disinformation.

  • @MrVaticanRag
    @MrVaticanRag6 ай бұрын

    Love the exposure of so much misunderstanding and incompetence of those rushing to "Zero Carbon".

  • @dixonhill1108

    @dixonhill1108

    2 ай бұрын

    What they leave out is Newfoundland is rich in oil and hydroelectric power. The wind is just a make work project for a part of the country with very high unemployment rates. If you understand Newfoundland this is top tier 4 d chess.

  • @fbryce1ify
    @fbryce1ify Жыл бұрын

    something seriously weird is going on. they all seem to be doing the most stupidest of things that make no sense to anyone other than themselves

  • @melmorrison1400

    @melmorrison1400

    2 ай бұрын

    Follow the money. Massive corrupt subsidies on so called green ‘products’

  • @denisemcisaac6320
    @denisemcisaac6320 Жыл бұрын

    The turbines are located on the Port au Port Peninsula NL.Residents are against this but seems like all who are involved could careless.Residents were not notified of these being put on our beautiful land and already 1 communities watershed was ruined.Residents are furious and this is just the start.Residents have been picketing for weeks now to stop this but it seems the Premier and the GH2 are ignoring them.We will fight as long as it takes to push these people out.164 turbines on a little Peninsula is just ridiculous.

  • @dixonhill1108

    @dixonhill1108

    2 ай бұрын

    "Residents are against " a bunch of welfare recipients, government workers and people collecting pensions. I.e. all dependent on government hand outs. Virtually anyone who is interested in actually working is all over this. Highest unemployment rate in the country people are desperate for work.

  • @user-kv5gh6le6y
    @user-kv5gh6le6y3 ай бұрын

    “ Sheep are really good at dying “ So damn true, especially in the north at -30 or so, saw quite a lot of it as a kid.

  • @markrainford1219

    @markrainford1219

    3 ай бұрын

    Sheep just drop dead for no apparent reason. Weird creatures.

  • @canadiannuclearman
    @canadiannuclearman Жыл бұрын

    one use of ammonia that's not talked about is to combine this with CO2 to make urea that turns out to be a good solid fertilizer.

  • @alastairleith8612

    @alastairleith8612

    Ай бұрын

    only good if you don't want to do regenerative ag. urea based fertilisers "burn" the life out of soils. they kill all the useful biota in the soil. also is responsible for most of the global nitrous oxide GHG emissions. Nitrous oxide is 100x as potent as CO₂.

  • @contrawise
    @contrawise3 ай бұрын

    Exceptional discussion. I am slowly coming around to the opinion that we need to use nuclear energy strategically. That said, you made a remark that makes me squirm. Paraphrasing - "Too bad the Germans aren't running the French reactors." How do we get owners and operators of nuclear plants who will have the integrity to abide by safety regulations, and refuse to cut corners? These plants should [almost] always be operated in that manner. Yet, I stumble across stories, without actively searching for them, of willful corner cutting - sometimes with whistle blowers getting fired. Leaves me gnashing my teeth a bit.

  • @2700toby

    @2700toby

    3 ай бұрын

    Nuclear was always subsidized with your hard earned money, besides the lack of integrity in that field. Technology to energize your home at little cost has been squashed many years ago. The idea to transport energy over long distances by way of cables is as antiquated as the internal combustion engine All of these old technologies are held in place by vested interests that want to keep you enslaved. It always boils down to few hands controlling the masses economically or otherwise.

  • @georgestirling1514
    @georgestirling15147 ай бұрын

    2.32 Does this project also include distilling sea water for the electroliser? If so what happens to the salt . .

  • @uncleROBERTY

    @uncleROBERTY

    4 ай бұрын

    No, they are using fresh water sources to purify, then release the removed contaminates in high concentrations into our oceans as effluent. The result will directly impact our groundfish and other aquatic species

  • @adriandawson4924
    @adriandawson49244 ай бұрын

    Wind output has a cubic relation with wind speed. At rated speed = 100%. At 1/3 speed down by 27 times = 3.7 %.

  • @aliendroneservices6621

    @aliendroneservices6621

    3 ай бұрын

    And there's an *_upper threshold_* of wind speed, beyond which turbine output is zero.

  • @briancam_2000
    @briancam_2000 Жыл бұрын

    What a $cam! Really doesn't seem possible?

  • @canadiannuclearman
    @canadiannuclearman Жыл бұрын

    43:00 it's like using gold to back lead

  • @dixonhill1108

    @dixonhill1108

    2 ай бұрын

    They didn't do their research, Newfoundland built massive amounts of hydroelectric we can't use. This is a way of using electricity we can't otherwise get to market.

  • @thomasd5
    @thomasd53 ай бұрын

    Nope, as a German, I can assure you that most of the energy is not going into agriculture, and btw. we have similar contracts about hydrogen with at least one North African country where the hydrogen is to be delivered with a pipeline. As an industrial country, we need hydrogen to replace coal and oil, for example, in the steel and chemical industry. However, since our politicians, like most politicians on the planet, are very incompetent, they also want to use hydrogen for electricity production, heating supplied with pipes, cars, and to produce "E-fuels" (synthetic fuels) for cars. None of those uses make any sense to me, since I think it is more efficient to produce electricity with wind and solar, store it with sodium-ion batteries to stabilize the grid, and use it for EVs and heat pumps. Above that, E-fuels are not very environmentally friendly even if they don't release CO2 or at least reduce CO2 emissions, but the fumes will kill thousands of people per year and cause chronic diseases for almost 900,000 people permanently (Asthma and Type 2 Diabetes). But I disagree with you on nuclear power, which is much too expensive. In the US, two projects with SMRs (Utah 6 reactors, and Idaho) have been canceled, in the UK the costs of Hinkley Point C (operational start planned 2026) have exploded to approximately 46 Billion £ (almost 59 Billion US $), in Finnlands Olkiluoto the cost of the last reactor have quadrupled and the plans for the next reactor have been shelved. Germany shut down its last reactors in April 2023, In Australia, the CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Australias National Science Agency, has evaluated the costs of the cheaper new SMRs and came to the result, that currently the price per MWh would be 509 AUD (340 US$) and can be expected to decrease to 282 AUD (189 US$) in the future. But since the price for renewables also is expected to decrease, the result of CSIRO was, that nuclear energy is currently not an economically competitive solution for Australia.

  • @thorsrensen3162
    @thorsrensen3162 Жыл бұрын

    The electricity price in Denmark had for some days in the last couple of months been over 400 euro per MWh, so 200 USD per MWh for the complex canadian ammonium electricity is cheaper than I had expected, even though the current situation here is getting very alarming, bakeries, supermarkets and restaurants are going bankrupt due to high energy costs, and people can no longer afford to charge their hybrid cars. No doubt nuclear energy is the only viable solution for Europa to this horrible situation. We cannot even contact our utility supplier as many have of these companies have closed their phones as they have given up on talking to people who cannot pay their electricity bills and are crying and asking for later payment, discounts etc. This is just the short story, our pension funds are also being robbed by these energy bandits you were talking about. Ørsted and Copenhagen Infrastructure Projects are milking the system and the backmen a getting extremely rich from these shady projects, with absolutely on positiv impact on the climate. Corrupt persons inside the pension funds and in the energy bandits are collaborating and authorities who should keep an eye on these financial entities have turned the blind eye to it, as it done to save the planet. Great interview btw. You should invite James again, he is a good storyteller and has a unik knowledge.

  • @zaneenaz4962

    @zaneenaz4962

    Жыл бұрын

    ...seems all accountability has lost. Need to return to communal living and cut out the greed.

  • @colinosborne3877

    @colinosborne3877

    7 ай бұрын

    The doom Brexit merchants are still saying the UK would be better back in the EU. Our only problem at the moment is that most of our Utilities were bought by the French when they wer privatised. Fortunately they are well controlled. If only we had a Prime Minister with enough back bone to stop all the woke rubbish about Climate Change. They are starting to crack over net zero and some cracks are showing about the practicalities of EV's.

  • @iancormie9916
    @iancormie99168 ай бұрын

    Putting the liquefication issue in to oerspective, you lose aporoximately 10% of the energy content of natural gas and for hydrogen, liquefication consumes approximately 30% of the energy content.

  • @colinosborne3877

    @colinosborne3877

    7 ай бұрын

    One UT channel here was calculating, from turning the windmill, to turning the wheels of an EV, that the combined efficiency is just 16%

  • @williamtaylor2387
    @williamtaylor23873 ай бұрын

    Look at new geothermal power, it may be a good part of the energy solution. They use oil drilling rigs, don’t go extremely deep and use sterling engines to generate power. They are using a temperature difference as the energy source.

  • @noelburke6224

    @noelburke6224

    2 ай бұрын

    Geothermal is not new

  • @henryterranauta9100
    @henryterranauta91007 ай бұрын

    A lot of objectivity 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼and state of science discussed here. Thanks for both of you 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

  • @richardstever3242
    @richardstever32423 ай бұрын

    They will outspend the entire budget before it even gets off the ground. Look at what happened to the Arrive Can. That is the way things get done around here. (or don't get done)

  • @bubbajones6907
    @bubbajones69073 ай бұрын

    Isnt Christia Freeland one of the nasties?

  • @galahadthreepwood

    @galahadthreepwood

    2 ай бұрын

    As is trudeaux

  • @andrewwilgress4100
    @andrewwilgress41003 ай бұрын

    Under contract, Hydro Quebec electricity goes to USA. If they need more, it must be imported back from Ontario. They sell it to USA for pennies on dollar the dollar, but buy back for much more. Huge power transmission losses.

  • @frankw2900
    @frankw290026 күн бұрын

    “Grifters harvesting subsidies” is the quotation of the hour at 1:01:24. Well said. The bane of the free world.

  • @rachedel-moctar4290
    @rachedel-moctar4290 Жыл бұрын

    First. Also, I would very, very much appreciate more content about energy policy in emerging countries. It seems everyone and their dog is discovering a new gas field these days.

  • @tacticoolrick5562
    @tacticoolrick5562 Жыл бұрын

    I like that word - energy realism. I think we need a realist party in Canada.

  • @rhonda-my_honda_cb500x3

    @rhonda-my_honda_cb500x3

    Жыл бұрын

    What about this acronym-word to encapsulate this energy farce: W.O.M.B.AT. Waste Of Money, Brains And Time

  • @colinosborne3877

    @colinosborne3877

    7 ай бұрын

    You have a bad case of Truthdoxia.

  • @AsylumLunatic-ig5jh
    @AsylumLunatic-ig5jh2 ай бұрын

    Sunlight, in Canadian winter can be 3-4 MONTHS without sun.

  • @findingthereal9052
    @findingthereal90529 ай бұрын

    I can’t find any online contact details for DUNE, can anyone post a link?

  • @freyfaust6218
    @freyfaust62183 ай бұрын

    There is no climate crisis. There is no justifying government involvement with any measures.

  • @SC-yy4sw
    @SC-yy4sw Жыл бұрын

    Splendid episode. However i can't seem to find the 2015 Oxford paper Fleay is refering to. If anybody got any tips where to find this, i'd be much appreciated.

  • @babsharris6724
    @babsharris67243 ай бұрын

    Sounds like JT sold us out & didn't allow us to grow our food.

  • @jimhallinsn1023
    @jimhallinsn10234 ай бұрын

    Hydrogen is a non starter. The power losses in the varius processes. From converting something into heat, then converting that heat into electricity, then transmission then converting that into hydrogen. Then transporting the stuff. It does not add up. However there is a naturally occuring material called mineral oil. It does everything at a fraction of the cost.

  • @haraldpost

    @haraldpost

    3 ай бұрын

    I agree, but I think the point is to make the climate tzars rich and us poor.

  • @sebastienloyer9471
    @sebastienloyer94713 ай бұрын

    What 😂 CANADA and scandals 😂 No !!!!!

  • @user-gi5uk1ln4s
    @user-gi5uk1ln4s3 ай бұрын

    Why not increase photosyntesis In Brasil we are starting

  • @stefanbernardknauf467
    @stefanbernardknauf4676 ай бұрын

    Hi there! The podcast is a little older, since then a lot of pots have cooled down before anyone thinks of eating from them ... Nevertheless the issue might boil up anytime energy prices sore up again. I guess you don't understand the German psyche very well. Besides the German Angst there is, in my opinion, the Total War Syndrom. To explain: every medal has its flip side. The Germans are logical and consequential. When they have decided something they go for it and implement it all the way. That's why they are so efficient. What it takes is that you have to be consequential. They are! The flip side is, once they are decided they turn blind to argument, and instead keep going, AGAINST all the evidence. For proof I take the "total war" speech of Dr Goebbels. Unfortunately it's happening again, this time in the war against global warming. So yes, they were and they are thinking of shipping amonia to Germany to fire hydrogen gas power plants. It's the ultimate nonsense, but it was in 2022 and still is in 2023 official firm policy of the German state, under the PM Scholz, that you cited in the intro of your podcast. About 10 years ago I was in Berlin in a utility company that operates one of the largest nuclear fleets in Europe. At lunch with my German colleagues, formerly EON, another formerly large nuclear operator, it was just generally agreed, an accepted fact, that you have to stop nuclear. They cannot think outside of the consequence of the decision that the Merkel administration took, no way! Like economics, politics are not rational, but behavioural. Rationality serves to dress our behaviour in decent clothes, most of the time it is no more. Keep up the good work, thanks for the podcast!

  • @Marley-ii6ls
    @Marley-ii6ls3 ай бұрын

    I wish the people who bought into the climate hysteria would simply look at who is profiting from the hysteria and who is promoting the hysteria. Also, look at the evidence behind the hysteria. It is disconcerning that the people of this planet will be behaviorally controlled due to the natural weather patterns of the planet, into perpetuity. The planet will likely naturally warm up due to it having come out of the last ice age. It's impossible for any models to predict what the natural rate of change should be. I would be more fearful for my children to be living in a totalitarium, dystopian world controlled by climate czars, than a world where you are challenged by weather patterns that have plagued people throughout history.

  • @petemorton8403

    @petemorton8403

    3 ай бұрын

    Those fires last year received no mention of it. It will restart again this year. With no mention of added to the closed earth system.

  • @andrewwilgress4100
    @andrewwilgress41003 ай бұрын

    Basically twice a day the wind will stop.

  • @diannegooding8733
    @diannegooding87333 ай бұрын

    Don’t be alarmed. Bjorn Lombourg.

  • @Marley-ii6ls
    @Marley-ii6ls3 ай бұрын

    Politicians should be forced to listen to a conversation like this immediately after they have been sales pitched, by a slick salesman, to invest into a 12 billion dollar windfarm development project. Unfortunately, the grifting likely gets in the way of making sound decisions that are in the best interest of Joe tax payer.

  • @jato72
    @jato72 Жыл бұрын

    It is much easier just to use CH4 directly for electricity, heat and fertilizer. 🤣

  • @nitram1737

    @nitram1737

    Жыл бұрын

    yeah and how would you produce that CH4? If not through basically the same process described in the video but to use CO2 instead of N2

  • @fenflaps2805
    @fenflaps28053 ай бұрын

    Interesting thanks

  • @petermcdermott5814
    @petermcdermott5814 Жыл бұрын

    Is t just me, or is there no audio in this video? Clicked on a few other videos, and the audio is fine with the others.

  • @fbryce1ify

    @fbryce1ify

    Жыл бұрын

    you … audio is fine :)

  • @andrewwilgress4100
    @andrewwilgress41003 ай бұрын

    No, companies are not compitinent anymore. The people are not hired based on aptitude anymore.

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie95517 ай бұрын

    In Australia you only have to object to being robbed by the people you were brought up to imagine were your guides and protectors.., to qualify for the same treatment as Whistle Blowers, not what anyone in a democratic country would expect, having done everything asked of you to obey the law. Rules are not laws, and the rules are disguised carefully as morality based institutions. The hydrogen story was dismissed in chemistry classes as too dangerous to be a fuel, even for electric catalytic cells, back in the 60s except for satellites maybe. So, don't know what to say.., this situation sounds reminiscent of "home" everywhere, where honest people are getting on with civil behaviour and occasionally falling foul of criminality of the type Michael Hudson reports built and destroyed Rome, ie put it and the world into the state it's in now on the brink of global destruction.

  • @Marley-ii6ls

    @Marley-ii6ls

    3 ай бұрын

    Making hydrogen is easy, but making it on scale and transporting and storing it is the problem.

  • @reyes09071962
    @reyes090719623 ай бұрын

    Atomatomen in Deutschland, Problem gelöst.

  • @wormwood6424
    @wormwood64243 ай бұрын

    This fertiliser fear is so unfounded. What ever happened to cow manure ?

  • @altosack

    @altosack

    2 ай бұрын

    Well, it’s woefully insufficient for the way we currently provide calories; that says more about the current system than the insufficiency of cow and other manures.

  • @wormwood6424

    @wormwood6424

    2 ай бұрын

    @altosack insufficient nutrients comes from growing food too fast.

  • @altosack

    @altosack

    2 ай бұрын

    @@wormwood6424 - Absolutely! It’s something I hear mentioned far too rarely, and it’s also true of organic fertilizers that increase growth rate. In practice, that doesn’t include cow manure.

  • @enzoh7763
    @enzoh77633 ай бұрын

    Thank you gentlemen for such good discussions. I must say. I learn a lot , And open my eyes to all the possibilities.

  • @happyforlife9599
    @happyforlife95993 ай бұрын

    What a stupid plan

  • @tokbucks
    @tokbucks3 ай бұрын

    Let get this straight so ice engine today gives everyone efficiency of around 20% but the host is outraged at wind energy to ammonia to electricity efficiency of 23%. It seems like fake outrage to me. Word.

  • @IhabFahmy
    @IhabFahmy3 ай бұрын

    _As an engineer I can ask: Is the project technically of dubious benefit? Answer: Very likely yes. Politician-led tech initiatives often are, because: (a) Politicians are generally more concerned with looking good than actually doing good; and (b) Engineers they employ are on the politicians payroll and politicians are so technically illiterate they can't evaluate even half of what they're told._ _A simple energy balance analysis would have told you this is a project likely for show, and to engorge the pockets of a few select individuals maybe._ _Despite all the above, Dr. Keefer, hyperbole doesn't become you. You made so many platitudes, sweeping generalizations and scientifically inaccurate statements in this video, that my confidence in information you may provide in the future has been seriously shaken. Climate change requires clear thinking and being versed in the art of "practical vs. pipedeeam". Reactionism is never the answer. You can do better that this._ _I do highly commend you, though, on having the scientific humility to change your mind upon being better informed._

  • @josephdupont
    @josephdupont4 ай бұрын

    The only thing I can say is that the electrolysis process that can produce hydrogen and oxygen from water can pump that oxygen and hydrogen across the world free of charch, because having backpressure on the electrolyte electrolytic process does not hinder the production of hydrogen or oxygen so others in the pipeline that you would. Need to move this stuff. There's really no limit to how far you could pump hydrogen and oxygen from the process of electrolysis that saves a lot of energy and getting oxygen. The hospitals let's say or other industrial processes and pumping hydrogen to the far reaches of the country.

  • @larsgustafmartin2556

    @larsgustafmartin2556

    3 ай бұрын

    Could you please give the mass and energy balance for that statement.

  • @goldcic
    @goldcic3 ай бұрын

    Hydrogen makes economic sense in batteries, maybe. This sounds bizzare.

  • @ambroseraftis3183
    @ambroseraftis31833 ай бұрын

    Nuclear is the most expensive and the most centalized source of energy. Renewables are the least expensive and that is why financial interests prefer the more expensive sources like hydrogen.

  • @swedishbob_7315
    @swedishbob_7315 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you Chris ... Oi James g'day ....

  • @MrFearcontrol
    @MrFearcontrol3 ай бұрын

    Germany is in need of hydrogen for its steel industry's. Which are at the core of most of german export production. Hydrogen is the only why to replace coal in blast furnaces for iron smelting.

  • @tokbucks
    @tokbucks3 ай бұрын

    Agriculture as we know it is ending by next year fermented proteins will be at $10/pound and will be at $2/pound. So only use for ammonia maybe to use in heat/electricity generation. Word

  • @zaneenaz4962
    @zaneenaz4962 Жыл бұрын

    why is the rich world so blinded......

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8etАй бұрын

    SAY SOMETHING THAT THE EUROPEANS ARE NOT CORRUPTED WITH.

  • @user-jt7qo8do9g
    @user-jt7qo8do9g3 ай бұрын

    I believe that Canada will have a dramatic shift in energy production in the next election.

  • @robertcox14
    @robertcox143 ай бұрын

    Cats produce a lot of ammonia, too.

  • @tokbucks
    @tokbucks3 ай бұрын

    I do agree with their argument for nuclear ☢️ power

  • @lst141
    @lst1413 ай бұрын

    Nice, public money for the hiperich to siphon

  • @justincheng3922
    @justincheng3922 Жыл бұрын

    I can only laugh! On the other hand, I like the effort to harmonize nuclear regulatory regimes and the thinking toward standardizing modular reactor designs.

  • @colinosborne3877

    @colinosborne3877

    7 ай бұрын

    With thorium obviously.

  • @opinionater9388
    @opinionater93883 ай бұрын

    You know Germany used to have a way to transport hydrogen around. They called them airships. Shame one accident seems to have erased the idea of lighter than air from consideration. It would be nice if people would rethink it. Of note. methane is also lighter than air, and could be potentially transported to Europe at atmospheric pressure in airships, or even just HDPE bags tied to seafaring ships like balloons.

  • @Marley-ii6ls

    @Marley-ii6ls

    3 ай бұрын

    It's all about the number of atoms. 1 turbine would inhale one balloon full of hydrogen in about 5 minutes.

  • @opinionater9388

    @opinionater9388

    3 ай бұрын

    ​@@Marley-ii6ls Depends on how big the 'balloon' is. If people wanted to, they could make some very big 'balloons'. Companies already manufacture plastic sheeting in large sizes. I don't think it would be that much of a technical difficulty to turn that into large 'bags' that could be filled with lighter than air gasses, and towed across the ocean like giant 'balloons'.

  • @Marley-ii6ls
    @Marley-ii6ls3 ай бұрын

    This would be a good video to send Pierre Poilievre.

  • @colleenforrest7936
    @colleenforrest79363 ай бұрын

    Zero carbon isn't the goal. The whole point is to lower the HEAT accumulation inside the Earth's atmosphere. If you're going to go through all this, couldnt you just st use the wind to dry zeolite, ship the zeolite, then add water when it gets to Germany and use the heat from that reaction? Isn't that a near net zero heat generation ctcle?

  • @user-gi5uk1ln4s
    @user-gi5uk1ln4s5 ай бұрын

    They want to this now in Brazil. Same zombi

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie95514 ай бұрын

    The cannibalism of unbalanced and inverted social responsibility, the Forever War.., well it seems like the alternatives we have to have, and Recursion to the Mean Bio-logically at Absolute Zero-infinity point positioning nothing in No-thing. (Renormalized Cynicism is exactly the same as despair?)

  • @danecrude
    @danecrude8 ай бұрын

    the only green is green energy is the money.

  • @andrewpaterson5192
    @andrewpaterson51923 ай бұрын

    Fascinating! But my end conclusion is Degrowth. The most productive research will be that which looks at economics without growth. There are plenty of countries whos populations are responding to the intrinsic incentives of capitalism which is to stop breeding. Japan, Taiwan, China etc . .. even countries that tolerate immigration are finding their desired source countries have shrinking populations. Nuclear simply cannot be scaled fast enough. A lost cause already. I am sceptical about food. The excess and inappropriate, subsidized, food production in the rich west is also a crime against the planet.

  • @alastairleith8612
    @alastairleith8612Ай бұрын

    Germany doesn't have a shortage of electrons. power flow in AC current sees electrons move "back and forth" at 50-60 Hz - they "oscillate", they don't "flow" from generation to appliance. seriously no expertise from this expert. THere's not electron deficit. power generation doesn't create electrons. they create electrical potential, that's it.

  • @rodrigomohr1277
    @rodrigomohr1277 Жыл бұрын

    German prime minister Olaf Scholz is an absolute dissaster.

  • @msxcytb

    @msxcytb

    Жыл бұрын

    It looks so. It is good to remember that the great damage started earlier and he is "just" continuing it though. Merkel is chemist/physicist and for staying in power she went full Utopian continuing what G.S. (russian agent of influence) started.

  • @louisegobert9027
    @louisegobert90272 ай бұрын

    I encourage you to tune into Ivor Cummins to get the other side of climate change,, please!!

  • @MrVaticanRag
    @MrVaticanRag3 ай бұрын

    Poor James he attempted to interrupt your 4 minute final rants 11 times? 1:09:00

  • @mandrews1245

    @mandrews1245

    3 ай бұрын

    You just can't shut him up!

  • @aliendroneservices6621
    @aliendroneservices66213 ай бұрын

    54:09 *pleh* · thr · uh

  • @CarlPenney-ey9ou
    @CarlPenney-ey9ou2 ай бұрын

    Could you convert oil burning ships into nuclear power, the emissions from the that would put a big dent in the environment. I think the shipping industry needs to be updated internationally to have certification standards for safety and reliability, to many ships are registered in third world countries and don't have to follow a minimum certification. I think we have a bigger problem with the ships in the world that has been sunk do to wars and storms the pollution killing the fishing grounds. Cheers

  • @Loagun
    @Loagun Жыл бұрын

    Your channel website is registered in FL, US. Why wouldn't a Canadian have a Canadian registered website? Are you pretending? Whois lookup

  • @tinycha0s

    @tinycha0s

    11 ай бұрын

    “doctors for nuclear energy” wtf is this shit hahahahaha

  • @stevehart3289

    @stevehart3289

    7 ай бұрын

    Look up Joan Baxter at the Halifax examiner. I am a resident of Nova Scotia in Vaughan's and our little community is being attacked by the economic hitmen with no regard to the environment or the public. Nova Scotia is facing a government/tax payer funded windmill epidemic

  • @gilleslabrie.royallepage
    @gilleslabrie.royallepage3 ай бұрын

    More sh$$t from those rip-off artist

  • @albertiwong
    @albertiwong7 ай бұрын

    devil is in the details, if there is a business case to be part of this deal. Then, why not.

  • @danecrude
    @danecrude8 ай бұрын

    how much coal,petroleum will be used to build, maintain and dispose of wind power waste. will anyone be counting the dead birds.

  • @rok1475
    @rok14753 ай бұрын

    I posted a comment this morning about you manipulating the truth in this video. I am guessing it hit the nerve and you removed my comment…

  • @2700toby
    @2700toby3 ай бұрын

    I don't agree with you on your basic geo political reasoning in this conversation. To start with Russia did not invest into a pipeline to Europe, at such high expense, to then use it to be shut down for political reasons. This was the most economical form of energy for Europe. Any large energy projects nuclear or otherwise always have been highly subsidized with taxpayers money and yet taxpayers never end up benefiting in any way down the road. In fact in most cases these facilities are usually privatized for pennies on the dollar. The technology to energy self-sufficiency for each home or business has been in existence for over 80 years but no political jurisdiction will ever encourage or support such a system. This is what you should investigate and support more rather than this incessant support of having a few hands reaching into every ones pocket to enrich themselves and at the same time enslaving the rest of us. I would say that you're of no help at all except for revealing the corruption associated with energy production. Most of us are aware of that to begin with, we're paying the exorbitant bills each month.

  • @JohnDelong-qm9iv
    @JohnDelong-qm9iv3 ай бұрын

    A drama queen and a stuntman have been chosen to decide our future.

  • @alastairleith8612
    @alastairleith8612Ай бұрын

    James Fleay bio on Great Simplification (another non-serious "science" and decarbonisation podcast run by an ideologue) :: "his included 2 years of work on one of the largest carbon capture and sequestration projects in the world " people know that gorgon is the most failed and failing CSS project in the world right? it's a joke. no recommendation for James with that line item.

  • @melmorrison1400
    @melmorrison14002 ай бұрын

    Europe had cheap, constant oil from Russia. NATO stopped all that. So nato have created this problem for Europe as well as the death of thousands of Ukrainians

  • @TomekSw
    @TomekSw2 ай бұрын

    How much subsiedies oil industry is getting? TONS!!!

  • @nowbeing1
    @nowbeing13 ай бұрын

    CO2 is good.

  • @Marlow64
    @Marlow643 ай бұрын

    lets not make this a shit storm don't over eggagerate the issue. Ps hydrogen is the source of Sun energy work from that FFS

  • @freyfaust6218
    @freyfaust62183 ай бұрын

    Petrodictators... :)

  • @robheusd
    @robheusd4 ай бұрын

    These kind of 'solutions' are close to insane, Germany will be very sorry for supporting the war in Ukrain against Russia and miss their cheap energy supply of natural gas.

  • @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi
    @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi6 ай бұрын

    can't electrolyse distilled water, need something to make it conduct current and the salt from sea water works well for that purpose :)

  • @Marley-ii6ls

    @Marley-ii6ls

    3 ай бұрын

    You need pure water so the process does not get gummed up. Similar to requiring pure water for a car battery, which makes hydrogen.

  • @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi

    @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi

    3 ай бұрын

    @@Marley-ii6ls pure water does not conduct electricity, so no electrolysis :)

  • @Marley-ii6ls

    @Marley-ii6ls

    3 ай бұрын

    @@EmilNicolaiePerhinschi you add an electrolyte to the water just as in a car battery

  • @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi

    @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi

    3 ай бұрын

    @@Marley-ii6ls then it is not "distilled" anymore, which was my point at the start of this conversation

  • @Marley-ii6ls

    @Marley-ii6ls

    3 ай бұрын

    @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi Technology yet to matureHowever, efforts are going at the global level to use seawater directly to make green hydrogen. China-based Dongfang Electric Corporation (DEC) successfully tested non-desalinated direct seawater electrolysis technology for hydrogen production powered by offshore wind.

  • @andrewwilgress4100
    @andrewwilgress41003 ай бұрын

    Support Russia and stop the Ukraine war. At lest stop fighting them (Russia)!

  • @patbudge2929
    @patbudge29298 ай бұрын

    Hydrogen isn’t the way forward either. LNG for now and atomic energy Canada would need to produce multiples more electricity.

  • @jacquesbigras9824
    @jacquesbigras9824 Жыл бұрын

    Haven’t Decouple group considered Battery storage which Tesla Elon Musk has been doing in Australia, Hawaï, Porto Rico ect….Elon Musk was mentioning that one square mile of solar farm could sustain all electrical needs of the whole United State. Maybe this 37:54 should be considered for all the electricity needed to assist this Canadian project with Germany?

  • @Marley-ii6ls

    @Marley-ii6ls

    3 ай бұрын

    These batteries can store the equivalent of 1 to 2 hrs of grid power. That's not a viable option when the wind stops for longer periods of time.

  • @Marley-ii6ls
    @Marley-ii6ls3 ай бұрын

    In the 60s and 70s, I thought we needed environmentalists to intervene and address the water and air pollution issues, which they did. Unfortunately, now they are causing more harm than good to the planet and its citizens.

  • @nitram1737
    @nitram1737 Жыл бұрын

    one and a half hours video from two nuclear heads weird no word about the unsolved problems nuclear energy has but so many about the unsolved problems of other energy sources

  • Жыл бұрын

    Which problem with nuclear energy is unsolved?

  • @nitram1737

    @nitram1737

    Жыл бұрын

    @ For example how we make sure the power plants don't melt down and destroy half of the country they are in... Or that they produce waste that takes thousands of years to get harmless without any option to actually store it for that long savly... Or if you are talking nuclear fusion reactor that a viable version doesn't even exist yet. Or that they use up fuel like coal or gas power plants, which will get harder and harder to get eventually just like the others. It therefor isn't a renewable energy source... Just to give you a few things

  • Жыл бұрын

    @@nitram1737 okay, there are lots of realiable and safe designs. Not every reactor is RBMK, and even these are safe if not ran by a bunch of idiots. PWRs, CANDUs, molten salt based designs... There has never been a single death handling spent nuclear fuel, and we still perceive it as something we can not control. We can. And it is too valuable to bury it somewhere, where it could not be dug out and reused. IDK, nuclear power has a PR problem, not an engineering one.

  • @DanskeCrimeRiderTV

    @DanskeCrimeRiderTV

    Жыл бұрын

    @@nitram1737 lmao, come back when you can name an ACTUAL issue with nuclear energy.

  • @nitram1737

    @nitram1737

    Жыл бұрын

    @@DanskeCrimeRiderTV well if you dont care about a state being uninhabitable for the next hundred years and dead people then i guess there is no problem with nuclear energy and also if thats the case there is no problem with dropping a nuclear bomb on your house either

  • @christianvitroler5289
    @christianvitroler5289 Жыл бұрын

    I found this an interesting insight until this climate sect warrior started to talk about his delusions

  • @intothelight8123
    @intothelight81233 ай бұрын

    Propaganda! pie in the sky nonsense!

Келесі