A.9 Income and substitution effects | Consumption - Microeconomics

Learn more: www.policonomics.com/slutskys-...
Versión en español: • A.9 Efectos de renta y...
This video explains what the income and substitution effects are, and how to analyse them in order to understand why we buy more goods when their price goes down.
Related videos:
-Marshallian and Hicksian demand curves: • A.10 Marshallian and H...
-Indifference curves: • A.2 Indifference curve...
Related articles:
-Marshallian and Hicksian demand curves: www.policonomics.com/marshalli...
-Marginal rate of transformation: www.policonomics.com/marginal-...
Thank you for watching!
www.policonomics.com
Learn, and enjoy!

Пікірлер: 47

  • @Joy-nz9qv
    @Joy-nz9qv2 жыл бұрын

    i could not understand what my professor was getting at with these diagrams but you explained it so well!!! thank you!!!!

  • @dennisajala7544
    @dennisajala75444 жыл бұрын

    A very impressive performance you have here. Thanks for these simplifications. However, I could not comprehend what you expressed when you talked about substitution effect at the beginning of the video. Please I would need it in writing. Thanks.

  • @femiairboy94
    @femiairboy943 жыл бұрын

    I have a candidacy exam in three weeks, you just saved me about three hours worth of review. God bless.

  • @headrushbeats187
    @headrushbeats1879 жыл бұрын

    I'm sorry for being immature, but Slutsky is hilarious.

  • @Policonomics

    @Policonomics

    9 жыл бұрын

    multiLOLable Indeed!

  • @Kons213

    @Kons213

    6 жыл бұрын

    There's a Russian football coach with the same last name, Leonid Slutsky, who used to coach team Russia in football. Later moved to the UK to work there, British football fans had a field day with his last name... xd Motto was "In Sluts We Trust"... lol

  • @ahmedalam5048
    @ahmedalam50484 жыл бұрын

    most concise VDO on the topic .....ever !!!! bestttt :D

  • @giftyboakye-boateng2323
    @giftyboakye-boateng2323 Жыл бұрын

    Can the Hicksian substitute effect be used to discribe a perfect complement preference?

  • @sheema107
    @sheema1077 жыл бұрын

    grt job.really u made economics simple thumbs up!

  • @shwetaram4702
    @shwetaram47025 жыл бұрын

    In which direction will the substitution effect change the firm’s employment and capital stock if the price of capital increases?

  • @ashishdhungana633
    @ashishdhungana6333 жыл бұрын

    how to draw a graph by ourselves in word or PowerPoint? is there any application to draw a graph like you did?

  • @user-md4tw8sp1c
    @user-md4tw8sp1c4 жыл бұрын

    Great, loving you.

  • @heyptech1726
    @heyptech17267 жыл бұрын

    amazing thank you

  • @fillermusic8760
    @fillermusic87606 жыл бұрын

    How would the table look like for a decrease in price of the good?

  • @Prolui
    @Prolui8 жыл бұрын

    This was pretty helpful, thanks.

  • @Policonomics

    @Policonomics

    8 жыл бұрын

    Dear +Prolui , We just uploaded our fourth video to our series on Game Theory. It's about the Battle of the Bismarck Sea, we hope you find it interesting! kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZHh4u9adZamqhc4.html If you like it, spread the word! Thanks for watching, The Policonomics Team

  • @hassankourani4155

    @hassankourani4155

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Policonomics am””

  • @youarif11
    @youarif118 жыл бұрын

    what will happen for non-market environmental goods???

  • @wisdomsimeon431
    @wisdomsimeon4315 жыл бұрын

    Great video, thank you!

  • @Policonomics

    @Policonomics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for watching! 😀🅿

  • @navinarajan1353
    @navinarajan13538 жыл бұрын

    Shouldn't the income effect be the derivative of the marsh demand multiplied by the Hicksian demand function not marsh (as derivative of the expenditure function wrt to prices is the hicksian demand)?

  • @palesamofokeng6984
    @palesamofokeng69842 жыл бұрын

    so when the indefference curve shifts upwards the equilibrium also changes?

  • @Victual88
    @Victual8811 ай бұрын

    Thank you very much

  • @meow1990_2
    @meow1990_27 жыл бұрын

    I don't understand the red line parallel to the new budget line?

  • @IsisMarquesDesign

    @IsisMarquesDesign

    6 жыл бұрын

    Yes, so you can compare how much you actually can consume of x,y with your new bugdet and the amount of x,y you'd have consumed with your old budget. It is as if you had fixed the utility curve and changed the price ratios.

  • @NamalIndrajith-MCP
    @NamalIndrajith-MCP4 жыл бұрын

    Superb...

  • @lourensstrydom1502
    @lourensstrydom15025 жыл бұрын

    I would like to see you listening to yourself once upon a time when you also did this for the fist time

  • @Economaa
    @Economaa8 жыл бұрын

    Minute 4:56 are you sure that there will be no effect on consumer welfare in this case? After all, there still is a price increase. I think you mean there is no effect on quantity of x consumed, however, the effect on consumer welfare is negative.

  • @mohammadfarhan7349
    @mohammadfarhan73497 жыл бұрын

    what happen in giffen good case when price of x increases

  • @irGuilty

    @irGuilty

    7 жыл бұрын

    the demand would increase for the giffen good as well

  • @mohammadfarhan7349

    @mohammadfarhan7349

    7 жыл бұрын

    irGuilty thanks

  • @gabordanos7469
    @gabordanos74696 жыл бұрын

    veery nice

  • @rossanabarazorda5733
    @rossanabarazorda57335 жыл бұрын

    gracias,muy bien explicado :)

  • @Policonomics

    @Policonomics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Gracias a ti ❤ Acabamos de abrir nuestro canal en español! 🅿kzread.info/dron/khb76DGIpws2gZGC9UeyHw.html

  • @gouriramkumar8430
    @gouriramkumar84307 жыл бұрын

    Shouldn't the red parallel restriction line pass through the initial equilibrium?

  • @ruthn3293

    @ruthn3293

    5 жыл бұрын

    No

  • @tahmidishraque6459
    @tahmidishraque64595 жыл бұрын

    Why SE is negative for normal goods? I can't understand :(

  • @irentagreneity212

    @irentagreneity212

    5 жыл бұрын

    Exactly,bt it's negative.. little difficult to understand. *_*

  • @user-md4tw8sp1c

    @user-md4tw8sp1c

    4 жыл бұрын

    the substitution effect

  • @andrei-teodorene9729

    @andrei-teodorene9729

    4 жыл бұрын

    Let's say you have pizza and burgers. A pizza is 3€ and a burger is also 3€. You don't really care about which one you buy, because both are the same price and same tasty. Suddenly, all the restaurant owners say that a pizza is 100€, you simply can't buy a pizza for less then 100€. What are you going to do? Spend 100€ for a damn pizza or just buy burgers for 3€???? I would buy burgers, everybody would do the same, I am not going to buy pizza, so, the demand for pizza is going to decrease, that's why the SE is negative, because you don't want pizza anymore, as it's too expensive, you want cheap and tasty burgers!

  • @Zen-ds4od

    @Zen-ds4od

    Жыл бұрын

    For price increase, the SE is negative. Because increase in price will make you want to consume less of it and more of the other good instead. For price decrease it is positive.

  • @raaifriz3333
    @raaifriz33333 жыл бұрын

    Why do we even talk about the income effect? There is no change in Income right? Could someone please explain

  • @Zen-ds4od

    @Zen-ds4od

    Жыл бұрын

    increase in purchasing power, same as income increase

  • @mdfahim8792
    @mdfahim87923 жыл бұрын

    Sister its not math its eco

  • @nickspencer5234
    @nickspencer52342 жыл бұрын

    stupidly overcomplicated

  • @10pmmemes88
    @10pmmemes885 жыл бұрын

    How much did you pay for a corpse to narrate the video?