I always thought about it while watching these zombie apocalipse shows/movies, that an actual army of fully armored medieval/roman soldiers with blades, shields and long spears would be a lot more effective against zombies than modern forces with guns.

@speedy01247

2 жыл бұрын

It really depends, guns have a massive advantage at range, but up close yeah go medieval on them.

@khaled3433

2 жыл бұрын

​@@speedy01247 Blades don't need to reload

@geronimo8159

2 жыл бұрын

Why would that make sense? When you're close, you're in danger. It's that simple.

@bourbonnrock-videoslegendados

2 жыл бұрын

@@geronimo8159 it does, just like they already said above. With guns you got the advantage with the range but once they are close, you're done.

@Jiron127

2 жыл бұрын

Humans get tired and zombies don't

This is interesting. I generally agree with the comments that trained soldiers with armor and knives should be more than a match for zombies. But I wonder about the small details like how soldiers back then didn't carry proper swords, more like long daggers which were great for stabbing humans but ineffective against zombies and if they needed to aim for a blow to the head to actually finish them. Even if they weren't aware at the start of the fight I would assume they would definitely adapt and utilize tactics in their favour

@alexandre67

2 жыл бұрын

By definition a dagger is a short bladed weapon. Roman swords were short swords.

Better than the battle of winterfell.

Might need to run this one back. There is no way the zombies would win. They're unarmed. Change the settings or something

I expected Romans would win because basically it was just a 2 vs 1 fight!

Shield Wall!!

I'm just now discovering this game. As other commenters have said, the zombie victory makes sense only given a particular set of zombie stats/abilities. If the zombies are just living human beings infected with a terrible rabies-like virus, then no, the Romans should make mincemeat of them. But if they're undead, with the only way to stop them being a devastating blow to the head, or by blowing them to small innocuous pieces, then their victory makes total sense. The gladius was actually a pretty small sword, really. The blade was only about two feet long. The way Roman soldiers crouched behind their shields, going for a headshot was difficult. They generally aimed for the midsection or the legs, and then did a lot of trampling of the wounded. This wouldn't work at all against zombies.

Centurions can't average 2 kills each?

@speedy01247

2 жыл бұрын

It's a disgrace, fully armored roman soldiers should be able to do better against unarmed/armoured zombies.

Bring les pebbles aux frontier usa baseball pitcher danse Gaza like

Quintillius Varus, give me back my legions!

Only 2 to 1? I think the Centurions can handle this. I think 1 Centurion is worth at least 5 Zombies, more if they do a 'Shield Wall'!

Wow, what kind of system does it require to run a simulation this large? Looks smooth as silk. Very cool

@Msatthew

2 жыл бұрын

Apparently, the game is designed to use the GPU to do alot of the heavy lifting. Apparently, this is what happens when instead of tracking dust particles, light angles, and body physics, you instead have it track how many centurions are getting mauled by a nigh-endless stream of zombies.

The valley of Kings can now truly be called... the city of the dead.☠️💀🧟🧟‍♀️🧟‍♂️⚰️

I was really going for the last 15000 but they got boxed in but they still fought bravely

Я думал, что римские легионеры победят. В реальности наверное так бы и случилось. 🙂

@user-of9ku4cn6v

2 жыл бұрын

Ну да в принципе на одного по 2 зомби приходилось..Могли спокойно укакошить и больше с щитом.

@FuckUSAbitch

2 жыл бұрын

Так зомби с одного удара не снести. Все же знают, что только если в голову ))

@TheFirefox19

2 жыл бұрын

спартанцы хорошо нагнули зомбарей

@deoni

2 жыл бұрын

Только если бить в голову. В тело бить бесполезно, поскольку оно итак мёртвое

I imagine that this is probably, at least in part, what hell looks like.

@topwaifu2104

2 жыл бұрын

That's how Valhalla looks like

You got to give the Romans archers and catapults. At the same time give the zombies ogres.

should do vikings vs zombies

Wow just wow

I think the 10 k soldiers with shotguns was accurate accounts of what I’d expected

The Romans would not have fought this way. Shield wall or testudo, pilum, ballista and catapult s.

should have learnt from Sparta 300

Off topic . What would 500 super Sherman’s against 500 super or auto catapults look like , Both sides advancing in an open field ? Lol

Ez elég hihetetlen, hogy egy harcképzett sereg nem bir egy hordával. Egy katonának csak 2 zombit kellet volna megölni. Erre még egy átlagos zombifilmben is képes egy átlagos ember.

Масштаьненько

Congrats

na próxima acrescente mil arqueiros por favor

Please.. what is the name of the program or game that creates these armies as virtual wars? .. Greetings to you.

OMG

I don't know if its the same as in the first game, but in UEBS1 when a zombie kills someone they spawn back into a zombie on the zombie's team. so their numbers grow with each kill, which could account for the victory

@eddieklotz9966

2 жыл бұрын

Not here as you never see the zombie numbers gain traction as kills flow in so I’d say it’s just death for death

@MorgulLord7

2 жыл бұрын

@@eddieklotz9966 yeah i just saw they wren't growing too. it's weird, i wouldve thought the romans would have better stats than this haha

What if the dead Romans turned it to zombies and turned on the rest?

oiii

Rave! cutting off hands and feet ! The damage balance is wrong

Ye kaun sa game hai.

YO IM THE 1K LIKE YOOOOOO

...human is more stupid than zombies .. lol

Cap

this map suck roman soldier spread out to far