Chapters: 00:00 - Introduction to Character Types in Film 00:53 Character Types Defined 02:29 - Chapter 1: Flat vs Round 09:02 - Chapter 2: Static vs Dynamic 16:28 Chapter 3: The Shawshank Redemption Deep Dive 20:31 - Takeaways

@johnmauriceotieno

3 ай бұрын

Any chance we could get a video on movie runtimes and what intricacies influence them? Thanks. 🎬

Proper theatre literature! Who needs film school when you have studio binder 😂❤

@peterkalyabe7553

3 ай бұрын

I know, right? 😄

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Class in session!

@ShadionicZX

2 ай бұрын

My professor often has us watch a video from Studio Binder in class, I'm sure other film schools around the world use their videos to help with lessons as well.

@haerverk

Ай бұрын

Fun fact: exactly ZERO of your favourite directors paid any attention to either, ever!

This is the kind of video people need in literature classes. So many writers struggle bus with the differences.

@Dayvit78

3 ай бұрын

Struggle bus?

@kaithecactus3714

3 ай бұрын

struggle bus ​@@Dayvit78

@LuisSierra42

3 ай бұрын

@@Dayvit78 we are all riding the struggle bus on this fine day

@Firegen1

3 ай бұрын

​@@Dayvit78 Just means struggle usually for a long time. I like the colloquium so I use it.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Hope this video helps!

This channel is getting a shoutout at my OSCARS ACCEPTANCE SPEECH

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

We'll be waiting!

I hope to add translation in Arabic. You have a large Arabic-speaking audience of cinema lovers and filmmakers who learn a lot from your channel’s wonderful content. Thank you for your efforts.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

I love how you employ a diversity of ideas on this channel. We learn that story telling, be it visual or not, is an amalgamation of a varied tool set and mind sets. There are multiple roads which lead to any destination. The only question is: which will you take?

I finally understood why 'Breakfast Club' - just works.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Excellent writing, like most of John Hughes work!

It's a complete audiovisual encyclopedia about Movie Characters. Thousand Thanks StudioBinder for this Inspiring video. Always Inspiring to learn from you StudioBinder.💯💯

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Glad you liked it!

Day by day Studiobinder's videos are getting better and better.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

That's the goal!

Please do a video on how directors and cinematographers conduct a blocking rehearsal. I love your videos so much and I've learned so much from them than any other resources, I even forgot the last time I watched other KZread channels. Thank you so much, you've been a blessing in disguise.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for the suggestion!

@samaraisnt

3 ай бұрын

seconded! there should be more on blocking and preproduction in general!

This one is worth watching over and over again. Thanks for sharing!

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

This channel is amazing ❤ Always so enjoyable to watch, full of the things I feel but could never put into words & grabs movies I'm remarkably fond about 💕

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Happy to help!

I have been watching some of your previous videos to understand filmmaking better. They have been beneficial, and this video does it again. Can you make a video about the slice-of-life genre and why people mistake it for the coming-of-age genre?

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for the suggestion! We covered the coming of age genre in this video if you want to check it out kzread.info/dash/bejne/p4hlx5iAebepo5M.html

Perfect timing for this video! We're working on character sheets in my screenwriting class :)

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Good luck!

Amazing video as always. Thank you so much.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Glad you liked it!

Such informative work!

I think this video complements perfectly the ones about character arcs. I don't know if there is one that goes deeply into character dimensions (physical, psychological and social). Anyway, this is a must see video to understand these to aspects of a character. Thank you StudioBinder 😁

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Hope it helps!

this is the best gift for my brithday! Thank U studiobinder!

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Happy birthday!

Honestly I want a behind the scenes of the process of making these great videos❤ Get to see the narrator, the writers, editors, animators and the office😊

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Appreciate it :)

This was incredibly informative!

Great video! This channel never disappoints. One thing I'd like to mention: Ferris Bueller himself is a rather static character. In the whole movie he doesn't have a big choice to make. But his best friend does.

Great content. Reminds me of people that I've known that fit these descriptions and what type of character I would be within my own story.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Interesting thought experiment 🧐

@CamiloM-iy7qd

3 ай бұрын

@@StudioBinder yes I think all of us can be any of them if we observe our own life. For instance my friends that have families could be considered static characters compared to me while I decided to live abroad for yrs and experience life outside of this structure. The stories I have continue as my character arc. So I think writing and creating a character becomes easier with thinking about ourselves and others we know. Love this video btw.

Thanks to John Truby & Bob Mckee I started understanding how to choose and build my character atmosphere according to the story shape

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Happy writing!

This video is quite informative 🙂. Thank you

Can you please also do a video on What is Climax? And What is anticlimax ?

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

We broke down the structure of a climax with Joker in this video! kzread.info/dash/bejne/iptmtreshLjckbA.html

Thank you SB

Really enjoyed this 😊

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Great to hear!

Flat vs. round can be thought of as a constant. Wherever they are on that spectrum, they remain there relatively constantly. Static vs.dynamic can be thought of as relating to the amount of moment to moment change, meaning not constant, but having peaks and valleys of different aspects over the course of the timeline. The more dynamic, the more quick peaks and valleys. IOW, dynamic characters are mercurial and less predictable than static characters, while flat or round characters are much more predictable. Of course if there is change in the character arc, it can be relatively quick change, or relatively slow change, and a character can change from any point on either spectrum to any other point, all of which can be independent of character type. What seems to work best for me (and is the way countless stories are told) is based on contrast between characters. I prefer creating a main character who is more of an everyman, bc readers or viewers can bond to that character and identify with them easier, a character who is slightly flat and slightly static (yet may have a significant change in the character arc) contrasted with a secondary character who is more mercurial and unpredictable, a little rounder and dynamic, bc they will be more interesting to follow, and the reader or viewer, bonded to and identifying with the everyman character, spends much of the story observing and/or helping the more mercurial character. One example is in The Office, where Jim Halpert is the everyman character the audience identifies with, while Michael Scott is the mercurial, unpredictable one he (and the audience) observes. That implies both solidity (Jim) and a 3-ring circus of entertainment (Michael). It gives the audience comfort in the predictability of Jim, and uniqueness and variety in the unpredictable (yet over time, paradoxically predictable) Michael. That dynamic balance of tension is one of the reasons that show ran for 8 seasons. This way there is a constant tension (usually positive) between those characters and each of them can really benefit from the other. The more mercurial character benefits from the more stable character pulling them back onto the rails and the more mercurial character shows the more stable character how life can be more interesting. They need each other. And a story often needs this. If The Office were mostly about Jim, with no Michael character, it would have been pretty boring. If it were mostly about Michael, with no Jim to contrast him with, it just would have been too chaotic for the viewer to latch on to for 8 seasons. And this dynamic can be seen in a high percentage of great stories, bc it works. All you have to do is look for it.

Some nice character foreshadowing using framing in the GoodWill Hunting scene at 10:06. Chuckie is boxed in by the trailer filling the frame, his future. On the reverse, Will has blue skies overhead (and ahead). (More evident in the wide shots throughout the full scene!)

Thank you studio binder

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

2:36 I uncontrollably belted out “YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!” right at the perfect moment! I couldn’t stop myself… what just happened !?🙃❔

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Movie magic haha

Today i had short nap 😴 I dreamt STUDIO BINDER opened new branch in my local area 😅 They were shooting an advertisement video 📹 as I'm going inside during the shooting i told one of the crews: " oh wow guys great work I'm ur fans one of ur subscribers on youtube " Wish it was true ❤

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

haha time to expand

- [00:53] 📝 Different character types help writers understand their characters' roles and functions within a narrative. - [02:28] 📚 Character categories like flat vs. round aren't binary; characters sit on a spectrum, allowing subjective categorization. - [02:29] 🔄 Understanding flat vs. round characters helps writers decide when and why to use each type effectively. - [09:02] 🔒 Static characters provide consistency and contrast, while dynamic characters offer satisfying arcs of change. - [16:29] 🎬 "The Shawshank Redemption" exemplifies various character types, showing how they can enrich storytelling. - [20:34] 🌟 No character type is inherently superior; each serves a purpose in informing and enhancing the narrative.

Love your videos 👍

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

Hard to think of Samwise Gamgee as a "flat" one, as the richness of his character, his involvement and encouragement of Frodo, and ultimately his happy ending, was so foundational to the narrative.

@LuisSierra42

3 ай бұрын

It was shocking at first but they are right, Sam doesn't have a ton of complexity or change, despite being so central to the narrative

@OldMovieRob

3 ай бұрын

@@LuisSierra42 I guess so, but even still, after watching the films and all of the larger than life heroic characters, it was always ol' lowly Sam that I felt I could most personally identify with. Maybe I'm just a flat-sort of guy, haha.

@LuisSierra42

3 ай бұрын

@@OldMovieRob Being "flat" in this sense is not bad, it serves a purpose in the story. Like they say in this video, not every character needs to be explored in depth

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Flat character doesn't mean a poorly written one!

@spinsandneedles

3 ай бұрын

@@StudioBinder You're right! Most movie sports stars are flat and yet dynamic and complex as they react to challenges. How about a video on what makes a great sports movie?

That was wonderfully done. I’m a better storyteller for having watched it. Thank you.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Happy writing!

Thank you

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

In the END a good character is a good character ❤

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

👌💯

This might be the best narrator in history

Charlie from mean streets is one of the best written characters. Round and dynamic

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Great example!

thanks a lot

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

Sending this to my whole film studies group chat

Watching your videos from Nepal 🇳🇵. Lots of love and respect ❤

these videos are so good and well made

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Appreciate it 💖

The best characters that still surprise me every time I see there will be blood. Now I see why the movie Plot isn't that dynamic. And why characters in movies like night in a museum are so flat. But I guess it takes a jurassic park to see both dynamic visuals and complex characters.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

That's when you get the perfect blockbuster!

Have you also done a video on narrative pacing in films?

You are the reason I love KZread 😍

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

We love our viewers!

Nice 💯

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

“The world is full of actors pretending to be human” -J.D. Salinger

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

🔥

Please make a video diff bw character driven plot and plot driven characters

Plese make a video and explain the "shot division" and "camera angle" choice of film "schindler's list"

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for the suggestion!

I was thinking about double role by Dustin Hoffman in "Tootsie" a flat actor vs. a round actress😜😂

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

😅

This channel is round and it makes me dynamic.

Please make some videos on the concept : Classical Hollywood Cinema 🙏😊

I think one reason why Shawshank Redemption works is that Andy still goes on a journey, even if his overall personality stays the same.

Omgg the theme song is in swahili!! 🥹🥹I loved the characterization of the characters too ♥️

IT'S ALWAYS SUNNY MENTIONED!!!!!!!!

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

👍💯

2 day ago I decided to write characters and now look who come helping

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Happy writing!

What's that creepy song at 0:32? I can't find it in the list.

We learnt about this in English class

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Nice!

Subtitles plz

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Subtitles are up!

@quantinium

3 ай бұрын

English only 😢😢😢​@@StudioBinder

10:10 When your true friend REALLLY really cares about you and doesn't try to hold you back out of jealousy.

Will this Video help in understanding the character in movie

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

It should!

Recently I rewatch a movie and realized why the movie feel so long even tho it just 2 hours. Then, i realized that the movie took place like a week in the story. The audience can literally feel the transition of day and night. So the question is, how to make a movie that takes place over the course of a few days/ weeks/ months or years? What the transition is? If you know what i mean...

20:24 💜

Can you guys do "how to do subversive writing"?? It's very popular nowadays but rarely any of them do it right.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Any examples you'd want covered?

@thhrjdh5564

3 ай бұрын

@StudioBinder basically, any movie/show that deviates from traditional norms in cinema or society as a whole. A lot of Kubrick's was considered subversive for the time. And I would say midsomar because it's subverting traditional horror tropes.

My Monday breackfaste

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Goes great with coffee :D

Cool

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Cheers!

I think Sam is static (never changing by always reminding us of the shire), not flat. There's enough character and personality to him that I wouldn't call him one-dimensional. If he was flat, audiences wouldn't have that emotional moment with him carrying Frodo at the end of the third film.

👌👌

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

Sometimes I've noticed that Flat characters are rendered more Round by their backstory or past (if it's honestly told ). That can make them flawed or broken, without many flaws to show for. Some other times, the reverse is also true. The lack of a past can make a character very Flat and downright boring.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

All character types have to be put into their proper place in the story!

cool

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

@ryanhowell4492

3 ай бұрын

@@StudioBinder I’ve still got long way to go

Are sar long episodes layena kab khatam ho gaya pata nahi chala

One of the best flat characters is The man with no name played by Clint Eastwood

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

💯 Can always rely on the great westerns

Please sir make a video How They Shot La La Land...

Anyone know the movie at 13:28?

@brandonscullion

3 ай бұрын

Garden State

@presenceof

3 ай бұрын

@@brandonscullion thanks bud

Arnold from ey Arnold is a very good flat character ❤

18:00 it is NOT unclear! Hadley Kills Tommy on the Warden's Okay. Why? Because the real killer confessed to Tommy, and Tommy wanted to tell the Parole Board. Andy Dufresne was Worth and Knew too much to be set free.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

👌

I have to take issue with your description of Sam Gamgee as a "flat" character and Frodo as a "round" one. Frodo is presented from the outset as a decent and brave hobbit. Consider when Gandalf says to him in the Fellowship that the Ring can't stay in the Shire, he says straight away "what do I need to do?". He really doesn't waver from the quest at any time except right at the end when he's standing inside Mount Doom. His deterioration into a moody and dark character is caused by the Ring, not by events, and Frodo remains much the same person. For instance, he is kind to Gollum almost right until the end. It is, in fact, his simple decency (which he never loses) that leads to his success. On the other hand Sam's development is one of the key themes of the books and movie series, namely that "heroes" are found in the unlikeliest forms. Sam, who sees himself as a simple gardener, finds in himself as the series progresses incredible courage, resilience, determination, fighting skills and initiative. If you watch the extended versions of the movies, the first main character we see at the start of the Fellowship is Sam and the last character we see at the end of the Return of the King is Sam. That is no coincidence.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Fair points! Only pushback I would say is that the deterioration by the Ring is part of the plot (he's carrying something that corrupts - a plot point)

@stephenwilliams3807

3 ай бұрын

Yes, but it is Frodo's simply decency and lack of desire for power that protects him and explains why he alone is the one character that can complete the quest (except for Sam). "Greater" people, such as Galadriel, Gandalf, Boromir and Aragorn would not have been able to do it.

Hey studiobinder can you translate your all videos in hindi ❤️

Dammit whats fhe last movie I swear I just watched it and forgot it "What do you think youre doing james"

@Respect2theFallen

3 ай бұрын

Found it damn that movie was meh it's Infinity Pool I forgot the title and character names and everything 😂😂🤣

12:48 Gotta give it to SCOTT PILGRIM for redefining Canadian Superheroes. Sorry, ALPHA FLIGHT. "Scott Pilgrim vs the World" wore it better. #CanadianSuperhero

With great characters comes great….

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

writing!

Early gang

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Welcome!

Add more languages please

eating pasta rn

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Our videos go well with lunch :)

is this like character development? if not why not do a segment on the subject

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

you could say character development is the process of a dynamic character

💖🔥🌍🌟

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

Samwise isn’t really flat.

Next time please add subtitles

@AskAir

3 ай бұрын

They already do. Turn on closed captioning bud

@sandymakesplans

3 ай бұрын

the captions are enabled now

@lonewolf_58

3 ай бұрын

@@sandymakesplans okay, thanks

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

They're up!

@PAPicturesOfficial

3 ай бұрын

It's okay. They already did.

This is exactly what I‘ve never liked about „Braveheart“. William Wallace seems to have been constructed more to serve Mel Gibson‘s ego than the story, so as a result he is flat, static, and boring. He is flat because we get to see only stereotypical facets of his character. Wallace is couragious, ambitious and charismatic all right, but that‘s it. He never doubts himself, and when he fails, it is because others are weak or betray him, not because of his personal shortcomings. And just watch how, say, Peter O‘Toole‘ Lawrence of Arabia is haunted by his ghosts of past events, his flawed character exposed, and compare it to the one-dimensional impact that losing parents and wife has had on William Wallace. And he is static because his character stays the same from start to finish. He doesn‘t have to evolve because he is already the complete package as a young man who knows everything from Latin to romance and battlefield tactics. Now flat and static protagonists may work very well with the early James Bond, which is supposed to be over-the-top and cartoonish. But unlike 007, in a historical biography beautiful landscapes and action sequences alone can‘t make up for such a lack in complexity and character development.

Please add subtitles for Indians

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

Appreciate the feedback!

Only the Protagonist needs to change.

@StudioBinder

3 ай бұрын

For which film?

What makes a great character Nazis 🤣🤣🤣

unestablished writers will absolutely get a pass for flat/passive character

Was going to share with 5 other potential clients for studio binder, until you had an irrelevant clip of Nicholas cage saying "g-d d". Disappointing..it wasn't necessary

@davidvincentdibona635

2 ай бұрын

You're not that important