What you don't see is the 22lr bouncing around inside the box of sand. Some say it's still bouncing around to this day

@dominuslogik484

4 ай бұрын

By far the longest standing piece of fudd lore.

@bananaballistics

4 ай бұрын

I’m afraid to open it up lol

@OleDirtyMacSanchez

4 ай бұрын

@@bananaballistics What you got also going is Pointed or Spitzer versus Wad Cutter or Conical. Sharp points cut and are made to penetrate through targets, whereas Wad Cutters and Conicals are made to dump their energy right after hitting the targets.

@OleDirtyMacSanchez

4 ай бұрын

@@bananaballistics Some Ammo Manufacturer makes a Jacketed 22 LR.

@glennllewellyn7369

4 ай бұрын

Facts!

The .17 HMR is definitely no slouch. A .17 caliber bullet, the size of a .177 caliber pellet. Penetrating a 1/4 in of mild steel, is quite impressive. Great video brother. Love the channel.

@CS-zn6pp

4 ай бұрын

17 HMR is a modern cartridge. It's a great varmint cartridge.

@d.parker6424

4 ай бұрын

When shooting a .17 HMR, you need to consider wind speed much more than any .22 cal.

@cm7032004

4 ай бұрын

Thought it was an eighth of an inch

@allanj4576

4 ай бұрын

@@cm7032004closer to 3/16”

@stevehartlieb

3 ай бұрын

It was 1/8in and wind speed starts to become an issue at 150-200 yards

Something that folks should remember, is that the bullet type will affect your penetration. Those hollow points are designed to expand upon hitting a hard/firm surface vs the first .17HMR had a point that's designed for going deep into the target, regardless of the hardness. Those rounded nose .22s on the other hand, are designed to give you a more kinetic mass that gives you an in-between of the hollow point and the pointed (but given enough gunpowder will penetrate just as deep). So if you want a more accurate comparison, always remember to keep the bullet type the same when possible.

@Fordgroup00

4 ай бұрын

Yep

@mightyjoeyoung1390

4 ай бұрын

Literally everything you just took all that time to type is incorrect.

@KyleTysver

4 ай бұрын

@@mightyjoeyoung1390So bullet composition has no effect on penetration? Interesting.

@wintersage6895

4 ай бұрын

@@KyleTysver betcha he can't even list 3 common types of metal combinations used in bullets and what they're intended for without using Google.

@user-ui4le8wo3t

4 ай бұрын

@@mightyjoeyoung1390 ok champ ... enlighten us, or will you ghost us because you know less than f#ckall

One thing us airgunners know is that .22 out penetrates .25, and .177 out penetrates .22 when shooting slugs(bullets) from our high power airguns. It's sometimes referred to as the "ice picking" effect. Less frontal area for similar energy= more penetration.

@rob6850

4 ай бұрын

That's what *he* said.

@life_of_riley88

4 ай бұрын

@@rob6850 😆

@michaelforrester9963

4 ай бұрын

Sorry couldn’t hear you over our firearms here in the us 😂 good luck with your air rifles

@life_of_riley88

4 ай бұрын

@@Krobear So for comparison, a 40 grain .22 bullet @ 950fps will penetrate far less than a 40 grain .177 bullet @ 950 fps. We like to stay under the transonic range with our slugs(bullets), as that's where best BC and lest wind drift are for lower powered projectiles.

@life_of_riley88

4 ай бұрын

@@michaelforrester9963 I'm in the US! You should check out some of the current high powered PCP airguns, I have a .30 cal that shoots a 50 grain bullet at around 1000 fps. Pretty fun.

I've had a 22 Magnum since 2002. Love that caliber! It punches well above it's weight class.

@randybeard6040

4 ай бұрын

I have a Farmer Friend that has killed many Deer with his 22 Magnum while Harvesting his crops from a Combine..

@walterfoster5682

4 ай бұрын

I had a friend up in pa.that killed a big buck with his 17 at 50 yds.

@asasquatchwithinternet6846

4 ай бұрын

I like how the comments are felonies 😂😂

@johnjones4376

4 ай бұрын

Farmer on his land. How is that a felony?

@relicpathfinder2800

4 ай бұрын

​@@asasquatchwithinternet6846 I like how you imply you know the laws of every place on earth.

I have all 3 and I LOVE my 17HMR. I bought mine in 2003 when I was home on leave and it was a new thing back then. I got lucky and bought the Marlin 17V which turned out to arguably be the best platform for that cartrdge! I taught my sons how to shoot with that rifle

@abadran8174

4 ай бұрын

I've been waiting for someone with all three or Atleast 22wmr and 17hmr. I got a question I'd really appreciate you answering; We know 17hmr would perform better ballistically but how about a 100 yard coyote shot. I dropped one with a side shoulder shot from 22wrm but I'm wondering could a 17hmr do it? Could it do it better? And while you're at it I'd love to know whichof the two is louder? Thank you, brother

@wasntme3651

4 ай бұрын

The 17 is worth getting for sure. Can keep it in a quarter size group over a hundred yards all day easy Peezy

@bluecordprecisiongrading2504

4 ай бұрын

I did an insane amount of testing on this cartridge on my Marlin and would be have valuable information if I were making videos of that back then@@wasntme3651

@abadran8174

4 ай бұрын

@@wasntme3651 I believe you, brother. You can do even better than that with a nice airgun. I'm concerned with terminal performance at that 100yd and beyond. I'd sure appreciate experience and any help on this one.

@bluecordprecisiongrading2504

4 ай бұрын

I would have to set up a calibrated sound meter for that. As far as the most effective at 100 yards, there are numerous 17HMR loads that I've used in my testing going back to 2004. There are several different types of polymer tips from different manufacturers, FMJ and Hollow Points as well. FMJ were the least accurate according to my testing. As far as power, that can be figured out fairly closely using velocity and BC@@abadran8174

Great tests ! I’ve used the .22 WMR for years and have always liked the performance of it !

Ray Romano doing an ammo test lol. Strong work brother.

If the 22 Mag had a spire point like the 17 HMR I'm sure it would have gone through the plywood

The tests against the wood, steel and ballistic gelatin makes clear that a .HMR and .22 rim fires are not to be underestimated in their ability to kill.

You have one of the best, if not the best channels for testing different calibers of ammo. I click every time I see one. Keep up the great work, i always enjoy watching and seeing the results 👍👍👍

Love your channel man! So cool to see how different rounds behave!

If anyone steals my identity they are going to be so disappointed.

@Rexolaboy

4 ай бұрын

Hilarious 😂

@ronreyes9910

4 ай бұрын

Had someone steal mine, they gave it back with a sympathy card.

@survivaloptions4999

4 ай бұрын

@ronreyes9910 My credit so bad most places stopped taking my cash.

@survivaloptions4999

4 ай бұрын

@ronreyes9910 My credit so bad most places stopped taking my cash.

@survivaloptions4999

4 ай бұрын

​@ronreyes9910 My credit so bad most places stopped taking my cash.

Overpenetration means the round isnt disipating its energy in the target. That generally means a smaller permanent wound path and less trauma. The most effective round is typically the round that dissipates the most joules in the target.

Thanks for making the point about not relying on rimfire. I tend to get maybe 1 dud in 10k rounds plinking and hunting. But don't forget that defensive rounds also get a lot of movement, moisture, and temperature variation as you carry them, potentially knocking the priming compound out of the rim.

Great video. Informative. And since I just bought a 17hmr I’m even more excited about the round. Definitely testing it on different material

@squrlguts46

2 ай бұрын

The squirrel on my profile picture was done by a 17 hmr

@cornellkirk8946

29 күн бұрын

.17hmr is a phenomenal round!

If 22lr beats anything I'm going to be very upset at physics...

@Roadking556

4 ай бұрын

I'm not a fan of the 17. I know there are some big fans for this round. I just know I went head to head with a few who worshipped this round. And beat them every time in the real world of taking game in all kinds of rough weather.

@rob6850

4 ай бұрын

Bounces around and liquefies the organs, bro.

@dominuslogik484

4 ай бұрын

@@rob6850 ah that is some peak fud lore, no bullet bounces around inside of a body because its full of liquid, it will ricochet at least once and travel in roughly a straight line unless it is going very fast in which case it may curve inside of a body.

@gunnermurphy6632

4 ай бұрын

I'd be willing to bed money it would beat 22 short and cb caps

@ctsnider88

4 ай бұрын

😅

Love you're channel you have a great sense of humor. Keep up the great work. Cheers from Canada 🍻

Just did a side by side test of these three and the 5.7. 17 hmr has been my favorite for a couple years and performed better than all three in my test

I avoided 22LR for the longest time, and 17HMR even longer…but when I found 17WSM the scales fell from my eyes. Now I’m a rimfire junky. Centrefire is still where I live, but it’s fun to step out for a little strange every now and again. Cheers from Canada.

@irishkelly654

4 ай бұрын

Where are you finding ammo for that WSM?

@britishbulldog8966

4 ай бұрын

@@irishkelly654 Just in my basement at the moment. It’s rare as hens’ teeth at the moment.

@irishkelly654

4 ай бұрын

@@britishbulldog8966 - I looked at one several months ago and a friend said great as long as you don't want to shoot it, LOL.. Obviously meaning the scarcity of ammo. So, I have not bought one as yet and will have to stick with the .17 HMR. I do have a .204 Ruger (CZ 527 Varmint) so I'll live, LOL. Cheers...

@harolddavis4138

4 ай бұрын

😢😢😢😢😢😢

@ryancrazy1

3 ай бұрын

@@irishkelly654 hows the accuracy on the 204 ruger? i want to get a 204

Lot of people don't realize a .22wmr rifle has the same fpe (power) as a compact 9mm pistol with basic ammo- they are both in the low 300fpe range. Also, on soft targets, .22wmr penetrates much further than .17hmr lol.

@Patrick-857

4 ай бұрын

That's because 17hmr dumps it's energy faster and does more damage. .22 bullets have a habit of going straight through a small critter, 17hmr splatters them and doesn't go any further. Typical behaviour of a small high velocity projectile vs a heavier slower moving one producing similar energy.

I can believe that the .17 HMR went straight through that big block of wood as it's going at proper rifle velocities.

@francislutz8027

4 ай бұрын

It's the only Speer type projectile of course it's going to penetrate deeper than a hollowpoint .22lr and a wadcutter .22wmr. It really isn't even a half ass comparison, all 3 are completely different compositions and type of projectile with vastly different designs. All this video did was show you how a .17hmr of that factory load performs in that wooden medium

@Magnum_Express

4 ай бұрын

@@francislutz8027 The variances in bullet styles isn't the fault of the presenter of this video. It's a manufacturer thing. 22LR comes mostly in solid lead, sometimes that lead is hollow, sometimes coated in copper. Every 17 round available these days is either a hollow point or a ballistic tip with the odd fmj or flat nosed jacketed "spire point". The 22 mag comes in a wider choice with hollow points, soft points , ballistic tips, etc. The reason for this is you can't drive solid lead bullets to the magnum level velocity that the 22 mag and 17hmr produce. Thats why their bullets are copper jacketed. To give a true apples to apples comparison, you'd have to shoot all 3 with ammo that doesn't exist.

@irishkelly654

4 ай бұрын

@@Magnum_Express - Great reply. Boy...waiting for francislutz to respond...the crickets sure are a chirping?! LOL...

@damonhebert5096

4 ай бұрын

Use FMJ 22 mag to truly compare it to 17HMR. I have both 22 mag and 17 HMR I should just trade or sale the 17 due to it have use to me.

love your videos. fun to watch and informative. Thank you

Now THIS is the test of the century.

@StrangersIteDomum

4 ай бұрын

Should have included 556, 57, TCM...

Wow! I didn't expect these results.. I'd have bet the farm .22WMR would be freeway exits ahead of either of the other two. Looks like I'm sleepin' on .17HMR! I definitely got taken to school with this video!

Just found your page! Very well put together and informative. Plus, hilarious quips 😂

Great job love your channel and your added humor very entertaining sir .

My experience .22Lr is just weak, .17HMR has a lot of penetration, .22Mag has a lot of energy it wants to get rid of, but they used to be loaded hotter.

Glad my favorite rimfire (22 WMR) made a halfway good showing. I ordered and received a few of the Banana Ballistics t-shirts. A big hit at the gun range. I forgot to order a sticker for my range box.

@jimnagel5611

4 ай бұрын

ME TOO - THE 22 MAG WITH 40 GR SOLIDS IS A KILLER -- BUT I DO HAVE A 17 HMR TOO -- BUT USE THE 22 MAG EXCLUSIVELY ON ARMADILLOS -- WORKS BETTER THAN THE 17 IN MY EXPERIENCE

A super-easy way to see into clear ballistics gel: pour a little water over the top surface of the gel and then place a piece of clear acrylic or polycarbonate on it. This makes the rippled surface of the gel 'disappear' and gives you a clearer look into the center.

17 fmj yes ! Any outher fragments on impact ! Accurate shot placement on all ! Did the same test on a car door 17fmj went trough and into outher door!

I'm a Remington 5mm man as still have my rifle from 1971 and lots of ammo and not going to run out anytime soon.. 22Mag beat it out and 5mm went obsolete. But at the time period, the 5mm bullet was superior to 22Mag as they were still just using the same bullets as 22LR. Having a 5mm, the ammo was 5x more expensive and my dad forced me to buy my own, we learn shot discipline and not out shooting everything like the 22LR guys so. I love the loud crack of 5mm

@glennllewellyn7369

4 ай бұрын

They really need to bring it back. BIG TIME.

@9529mm

4 ай бұрын

Aguila makes the 5mm with a 30 gr bullet. Original Rem 5mm were 38 gr. Aguila rounds are fine in my rifle and can take care of my woodchuck problem when needed!

@carlmason6572

4 ай бұрын

Aguila made. Haven't seen any in years. Unfortunately my first firearm, Remington 591, and about 2000 rounds of the Aguila ammo were lost in a house fire four years ago. I sure miss that rifle; it was hell on coyotes.

@harmonsimmons6194

3 ай бұрын

Kudos to you sir!!! My first rifle, that I worked hard through the summer to earn money for, was a Remington Model 591 magazine fed 5mm Remington Magnum. I found it in a local gunsmith/dealer's gun rack and immediately fell in love with it. My father allowed me to purchase this rifle and I felt like I could take on any animal on any continent with it. I owned it for several years, but finding ammo for it was difficult and the price at nearly $6.00 per box of 50 rounds, was a bit above my budget as a young person. I still own 1/2 box of original Remington ammo for it. Dear Lord, I loved that little rifle!!! Thank you for the memories.

@jimm2099

3 ай бұрын

I had a Remington 5mm RMR growing up, that was a kick-but rimfire. I loved that rifle, too bad they stopped making ammo.

I have a RUGER 96/22 magnum lever gun (yes, RUGER once made a few lever guns) and a RUGER Single Six with a 22 mag cylinder always in it. .22 WMR is a very powerful rimfire cartridge. Not up to 5.7 x28 but still powerful.

@mediocreman2

4 ай бұрын

Ruger is now making lever action guns again under the Marlin brand.

@exothermal.sprocket

4 ай бұрын

@@mediocreman2 Ruger owns the company, but they are still Marlin rifles. Ruger itself made lever actions at one time.

@daleharvey3278

4 ай бұрын

Owning the 96.. you lucky bàs..... I have a 77 , but I wish my wallet would have allowed me to afford all the 96 cals

22 Magnum ❤ you can clear your gel block (wrinkles) with a gentle torch melting. Great channel! Thanks

I like your style young man. You have earned my sub!

I have a 22 and a 22 magnum rifle. I never thought to get a 17 caliber but because of this video I will probably buy one now. Thank you for the knowledge.

@francislutz8027

4 ай бұрын

There was no knowledge in this video. All 3 factory loads have vastly different projectiles, of course the hardest metal with the most conical shape .17hmr is going to outperform a hollowpoint .22lr and a wadcutter .22wmr

@dontworrybout2664

4 ай бұрын

@@francislutz8027multiple other videos show the 17hmr has better ballistics than the other two. Fud

@exothermal.sprocket

4 ай бұрын

And the cleaning rod and brushes you'll need for 17. Also I think 17 is more apt to foul sooner due to the geometrically tiny bore.

This was a lot of fun but leaving out the CCI Velocitor seems like a major oversight!

Really enjoy your channel, good info, thanks

Very good video! I've been looking forward to one!! How about a test with ballistic gel in the 17 hmr testing all the different brands and grains.

I knew the 17 her would puncture that 6x6. Love the 17 HMR

I think a lot of the penetration test results come from the construction and shape of the projectile. The 17 hmr has a sharper point design and look to have a more robust jacket. My $.02, FWIW.

Awesome humor on this video!

Thanks for a great vid and test.

We love the 17 home I have taken down coyotes at 260 yds with it . We have not got the .22 out of the safe since getting 17 hmr in over 12 years. Thank you very much for this video Don And Donna north idaho

@benyatrock

4 ай бұрын

Hmm, are you sure about the 260 yards? A 17hmr round at that range would probably have less than 50 lbs-ft of energy. That's pretty light for a coyote sized varmint. Heck, it's light even for a wood chuck. Where did you hit your coyote? The eternal or the temple area?

@wasntme3651

4 ай бұрын

@@benyatrock You would be surprised lol. The 17 is a badass hot little round.

@myrond3588

4 ай бұрын

Same. After I got my 17 I haven't shot any of my 22s.

That massive muzzle brake on your 17 HMR is a trip. 😅 Do you really feel like it's doing anything to help mitigate some of that heavy recoil?

@edgarsmittenheighnjenkson9226

4 ай бұрын

It looks cool though.😂

@SeersantLoom

4 ай бұрын

I've shot 17HMR with silencer. Was prepared for some more recoil and little bang but there wasn't much. On subjective scale - less recoil than 22LR.

@donalddarbonne779

4 ай бұрын

Bahaha!

@joshrandall3632

4 ай бұрын

No, but it definitely protects the crown of the muzzle. For me, that makes it well worth it.

I really like the addition of the gel test

Great data. Thank you! 👍👍

Great test!

That was an interesting test. Guess we can call .17HMR the “Pine Slayer”!

@dankjankings7339

4 ай бұрын

The things it punches holes in will blow your mind and the range and accuracy with good conditions(no wind) is crazy.

it'd be cool to see underwood make a .22wmr extreme defender solid copper or brass round.

@exothermal.sprocket

4 ай бұрын

Lehigh Defense actually makes those projectiles. Underwood also loads Barnes copper bullets in a few products. Cutting Edge Bullets actually makes a hand-loadable .22LR cartridge using copper spire pointed bullets. Nothing for .22wmr however.

First time watching your videos, the voice to face caught me off guard. Awesome video man.

It would be interesting to see how the 17 Winchester super Magnum would do.

@aberodrigue5916

4 ай бұрын

Funny to see this, I get to see this video. And just a few minutes later am asking the same question? What about the 17 WSM?

@texas66

4 ай бұрын

Maybe he's saving the 17WSM to go against the 9mm Flobert.... 😮 Nevermind, I forgot Flobert is a shotshell ....

@russellmerritt9935

4 ай бұрын

I have one it's in a different league. 600 feet faster than the hmr

I’ve owned all 3 and they are all great cartridges! My only complaint with the 17hmr is that it get dirty really quick, so its not a great choice if you do a lot of target shooting. Still it is a fantastic hunting cartridge and would recommend it for that any day!

@victorwaddell6530

4 ай бұрын

The downside of the 17 HMR is that gets bucked around in the wind more .

@irishkelly654

4 ай бұрын

Sure it isn't your ammo choice? Buy a bore snake, quick and easy (temporary clean) at the range or in the field.

@NemrahG

4 ай бұрын

@@irishkelly654 noo i tried a bunch of different ammos. The bore is just so narrow that even normal amounts of fouling will constrict the bore quicker and cause pressure issues sooner. I also didn’t have this issue with just 17hmr but with 17 hornet as well. With 17 caliber guns you gotta clean them more often and make sure to use a copper solvent every once in a while. But with a clean gun Ive never had issues with either round and fantastic accuracy, especially with the 17 hornet.

@NemrahG

4 ай бұрын

@@victorwaddell6530 honestly ive never found it any worse than the 22wmr with the wind. Its just so fast and its BC is better so it just cuts thru the air.

@irishkelly654

4 ай бұрын

@@NemrahG - Not sure what to tell you? I've had my CZ452 in .17HMR for 20 years and never had this problem and I've shot thousands upon thousands of rounds in that time. Twice a year I use rod, mop and patches, the rest of the time just the bore snake (I use two, one with solvent and the other to clear out). That's why I asked about your ammo. I have .204 Ruger, not much bigger than.17 but again, never had issues you speak of?

Great testing Big Thanks

In pellet guns we found the 177 to be a superior caliber for killing grouse and ptarmigan. The 177 pellets always put them down due to that penetration. The 22 consistently bounced off as opposed to penetrating. Worked but the 177 was more consistent.

Nice test but mini mag would be the last cartridge I would have used for this test. Try a federal punch, stinger, or a solid point Aguila super maximum. Oops. Posted before watching the whole thing (stinger)

This Terry guy is a great add to the channel. He really brings the entertainment level way up. 😉

I used to shoot 17HMR as my primary short range varmint gun, but any wind can really throw that light bullet around. 22 WMR bucks the wind better and I've switched to 22 mag. But when it comes to accuracy, .22 LR is hard to beat. There's been decades of development of precision 22LR ammo. Pick your cartridges based on what you need.

The results are not a surprise: The kinetic energy formula is KE = 1/2 * M * V^2, M=mass, V=velocity This means that if you double the velocity e.g. bullet, KE increases 4 times with the same mass. While doubling mass of a bullet only increases KE by 2 times. The 17HMR was double the velocity of the 22LR, and the 22WMR was 500fps slower than the 17HMR A smaller diameter bullet has less friction both in the air and passing through an object e.g. it takes less force to pass a needle through a heavyweight piece of canvas vs using a pencil, it takes less energy to push wood or steel out of the path of the bullet allowing clean pass throughs.

@jasonlynch9665

Ай бұрын

Wow Jim Bob dun goods ins math is class

Mosin nagant rifle - test. 😍💪💯✋🌍.

Great videos! Informative, funny and you have a voice for radio. I'm a big fan of rimfire purely based on prices here in Canada, the .22 WMR is one of my favourite rounds, the only reason I don't lean towards the .17 HMR is price and availability where I live. But the .17 HMR is a really nice round, very accurate for rimfire.

interesting channel Keep up the testing it was very cool.

Before watching I will guess 17 HMR will win

@tundranomad

4 ай бұрын

Same

The .17 is underrated. good for some things, terrible for others. I took a rabbit with one a few days ago and the HP really ripped it up, no good. But for raccoons, groundhogs, and other pests you aren't taking for meat, its a killer to get through thick skin/fur/fat. Also shoots very flat, but has a terrible BC obviously because of its weight. Inside 100 with no wind, its a beast.

I love and keep all 3 calibers in rotation. How I feel on the squirrel hunt determines which I bring. I have to say, I enjoy your visual on this! But I still don't know which I'd prefer if i could only have one

Love the tanker muzzle brake on the 17hmr 😂

Nice seeing the gold ring scopes. :)

Great video. Re: caliber v. penetration: My favorite author & gun enthusiast the Late Great L. Neil Smith always wanted to see an electromagnetic wire-fed NEEDLE gun.

Great, informative video. Thank you.

I love your testing, thank you! An idea for future video: what if you scrape a bullet with a razor or make a groove or dent in it, how much will that affect the trajectory?

The 17 HMR round is so small it slips between the molecules of the wood as though they weren’t even there.

@marcosdenizatrailhiker2037

2 ай бұрын

Agreed!

I'm sure someone mentioned it, but to make your Gel Blocks clearer, use a "heat gun" to melt the outsides to be smooth

Like your offbeat style! 😂 Subbed!!!

Comparing different calibres is fun. We need to see different bullets in the same calibre.

Thanks, Banana Ballistics.

Great comparison!!🤩👍🏼🤙🏽

Dude looks like the nerds who got stuffed in lockers but sounds like the jocks who stuffed those nerds into them. lol

I've done this test. .17 HMR is an awesome round, I love the lil' fella. .17HMR pops a hole through a road sign like you drilled it with a drill press. Perfect little hole, sweet!

It'd be cool to see a follow up with some of the various 22lr- performance can vary wildly. Try like Federal Punch, Aguila Supermaximum, CCI Suppressor or Subsonic, Remington Cbee, and maybe one of the more contentious bulk packs like Winchester Wildcat or Remington Thunderbolt.

Great video!

Love my cheap Savage 17. On sale for $225 with a great scope. Super accurate!

17 made to go thru stuff. Nice compilation of what happens with different bullet types.

Holy cow, I've been underrating the .17 HMR for a while!

Telling the hawk to shut up was hilarious!!’n

Bought a Keltec PMR-30 a few years ago and I was impressed enough to daily carry it for a couple years. Having 30+1 rounds of 22 mag in a pistol is definitely a plus but my favorite thing was the low recoil allowing you to put several accurate shots in quick succession. Got a flash reducer because in low light situations it would be like a camera flash in your face without it and having a little more length on the barrel itself didn't hurt. Carry a XD in 45 ACP now so definitely a swing in the other direction but still has 15+1.

[Comment before watching it: I am a big 22mag fan. My father always had his Winchester model 94 in .22mag and that thing was great be it open sights or scoped. I myself chose the Lever action Rugger 77 All weather setup with a Leupold Scope (yes, the scope cost more then the gun but luckily for me my Grandfather owned a Gun Shop for awhile in the 80s/early90s so I took advantage of that) in 22mag and loved it too.]

@korgan7779

4 ай бұрын

Well, honestly, I can't say I'm surprised by the results. As technology changes it tends to get better and it either improves the existing Round/Cartridge or Replaces it but stands firmly because of the foundation of those before it. This is demerited well in the differences and change over by military forces from things like the Round Ball to the Minie Ball bullet or the spitzer bullet versus the older round nose bullet. Yes, I'm a .45 ACP Guy, though I admit the 10mm is most likely better, and the 9mm certainly holds it own today with the advantages of new technology and improvements of the components of the round, I don't switch over for the biggest of reasons and that is the $$$. When you start with something and invest wholly in it over the years you really can't afford to change all the equipment you already have. Regardless, excellent presentation, and thank you for sharing it with us!

You are unique. The only video where a ballistic gel breaks a wind with fume!

These videos are super fun.

I won a 17hmr at a nra dinner and I planned on giving it to my nieces till I went to go sight it in and realized how accurate and fun they could be. Usually the smaller cartridges are not very exciting but they are usually cheap so you can plink more. At 50yds with a $220 Rossi I stacked 10rds in a dime. I’m currently working towards some long range shooting and with my local club only having 200yds available I’ve been considering building a 22 so I can practice the dope basics. It’s a great round to start with especially with how expensive match ammo for any of the cartridges that perform well at distance even if you reload

Thanks for the video

The seventeen h m r is a precision shooting round at a little farther distance and more flat shootin, Each has their pros and cons

The most unscientific, the most non-repeatable results, yet more fun than that! Thanks! Keep having fun! Subscribing!

I use the CCI .17HMR 17gr Varmint Tip from a Savage bolt action rifle for groundhogs at 40 yds. CCI calls this their A-17 round, according to CCI it is rated at higher velocity to optimize reliable function in the Savage A-17 rifle, which I don't have. CCI rates the muzzle velocity at 2650, so it's gonna shoot pretty flat. Head shots send the groundhogs straight to paradise regardless of whether any shadow was seen. The varmint tip does not penetrate, it frags. I see about 3" of penetration in animal flesh and massive tissue damage. Also nice is this round is not terribly loud and I don't need hearing protection shooting it outdoors. .17 HMR is a wicked little round, I like it a lot.

@onemoremisfit

4 ай бұрын

@@robv1257 Yeah I like my Savage bolt action a lot. It has a stainless heavy barrel, a fine trigger, a nice looking laminated wood thumbhole stock and it didn't cost a fortune. The only issue is it's lefty and the stock won't allow ambidextrous shooting so 90% of shooters can't use it without first changing the stock. I found it at a gun show in 2015 and snapped it up. I put a decent bipod and a decent but inexpensive scope on it and it shoots fine. Real nice rifle for the money. I have 10 rd mags for it but it could be a single shot for my purpose. For varmints at shorter range with .17HMR you pretty much can't miss.

Baritone for sure. Very good review. Thank you.

Came for the ballistic tests, stayed for the tasty nuggets of background music. 🎵🎶👍

I made my own DIY gelatin about 10 years ago from a KZread video. I'm still using the same gelatin to this day. It's room temperature stable, doesn't need to be refrigerated, just keep it in a sealed container. A couple of key things, never cook/overheat it when remelting it back down and remolding it. If you 'cook' it, then it can/will spoil like a food product. Second, the recipe needs to include glycerin, this is what holds the moisture/acts as the preservative. Over the years you'll occasionally need to add a little distilled water & a few drops of glycerin from the natural loses that occur from repeated heat cycles. I made enough to fill two 5 gallon buckets and it cost me roughly $80 (back in the day). I was using it for casting detailed items, only later did I try shooting it and the results made me smile :).

@garylisewski3130

4 ай бұрын

How did u cast with this?

@adf360

4 ай бұрын

@@garylisewski3130 You suspend the item you wish to cast into the gelatin when it's liquid. Once solidified, pull/pop it out, pour in your choice of medium, silicone is best. Typically, I carve what I need out of wax, then coat it with latex body paint, otherwise the hot gelatin doesn't play well. Most anything that 'kicks off' and produces heat is incompatible for obvious reasons. When finished, gently reheat the gelatin, pour it through cheese cloth to remove contaminants into sealed containers. I've used gallon ice cream buckets for ten years.

@garylisewski3130

3 ай бұрын

@@adf360 thank you!!!

Bravo! Good Show!

Thank you!

Salient and concise. 👍

I love that chronograph. Best I've ever used.

@bananaballistics

4 ай бұрын

I agree

@exothermal.sprocket

4 ай бұрын

Garmin has the market on consistent, reliable, compact, accurate chronographs right now, in my opinion. Beats that clunky massive orange beast on a tripod.